Almonds Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate, 35182-35184 [05-12006]
Download as PDF
35182
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 116 / Friday, June 17, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Question
Yes
No
Documentation
(TAP; petition; regulatory agency; other)
N/A 1
a. copper and sulfur compounds;
b. toxins derived from bacteria;
c. pheromones, soaps, horticultural oils, fish emulsions, treated
seed, vitamins and minerals?
d. livestock parasiticides and medicines?
e. production aids including netting, tree wraps and seals, insect
traps, sticky barriers, row covers, and equipment cleaners?
1 If
the substance under review is for crops or livestock production, all of the questions from 205.600(b) are N/A—not applicable.
[FR Doc. 05–12007 Filed 6–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
[Docket No. FV05–981–2 PR]
Almonds Grown in California;
Increased Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Almond Board of California (Board) for
the 2005–06 and subsequent crop years
from $0.025 to $0.030 per pound of
almonds received. Of the $0.030 per
pound assessment, 60 percent (or $0.018
per pound) would be available as creditback for handlers who conduct their
own promotional activities. The Board
locally administers the marketing order
which regulates the handling of
almonds grown in California.
Authorization to assess almond
handlers enables the Board to incur
expenses that are reasonable and
necessary to administer the program.
The crop year begins August 1 and ends
July 31. The assessment rate would
remain in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by
June 27, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202)
720–8938, E-mail:
moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or Internet:
https://www.regulations.gov. Comments
should reference the docket number and
the date and page number of this issue
of the Federal Register and will be
available for public inspection in the
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:15 Jun 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maureen T. Pello, Senior Marketing
Specialist, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street,
suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721;
telephone: (559) 487–5901, Fax: (559)
487–5906; or George Kelhart, Technical
Advisor, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237; telephone:
(202) 720–2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
981, as amended (7 CFR part 981),
regulating the handling of almonds
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, California almond handlers are
subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as proposed herein
would be applicable to all assessable
almonds beginning August 1, 2005, and
continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated. This rule will not preempt
any State or local laws, regulations, or
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
policies, unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom.
Such handler is afforded the
opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. After the hearing USDA would
rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United
States in any district in which the
handler is an inhabitant, or has his or
her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Board for the 2005–06 and subsequent
crop years from $0.025 to $0.030 per
pound of almonds received. Of the
$0.030 per pound assessment, 60
percent (or $0.018 per pound) would be
available as credit-back for handlers
who conduct their own promotional
activities.
The order provides authority for the
Board, with the approval of USDA, to
formulate an annual budget of expenses
and collect assessments from handlers
to administer the program. The
members of the Board are producers and
handlers of California almonds. They
are familiar with the Board’s needs and
with the costs for goods and services in
their local area and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
For the 2004–05 and subsequent crop
years, the Board recommended, and
USDA approved, an assessment rate that
would continue in effect from crop year
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 116 / Friday, June 17, 2005 / Proposed Rules
to crop year unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Board or other
information available to USDA.
The Board met on May 12, 2005, and
unanimously recommended 2005–06
expenditures of $28,756,000. In
comparison, last year’s budgeted
expenditures were $24,077,344. The
recommended assessment rate of $0.030
would be $0.005 higher than the rate
currently in effect, and the credit-back
portion of the assessment rate ($0.018
per pound) would be $0.004 more than
the credit-back portion currently in
effect.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Board for the
2005–06 crop year include $15,423,000
for domestic advertising, market
research, and public relations;
$4,920,000 for operational expenses;
$4,873,000 for international public
relations and other promotion and
education programs, including a Market
Access Program (MAP) administered by
USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service
(FAS); $1,200,000 for nutrition research;
$850,000 for production research;
$830,000 for food quality programs; and
$500,000 for environmental research,
plus other minor sums. Budgeted
expenses for these items in 2004–05
were $12,540,000 for domestic
advertising, market research, and public
relations; $3,611,981 for operational
expenses; $4,340,000 for international
public relations and other promotion
and education programs, including a
MAP administered by USDA’s FAS;
$1,200,000 for nutrition research;
$947,321 for production research;
$858,000 for food quality programs; and
$460,042 for environmental research,
plus other minor sums.
The Board recommended increasing
the assessment rate from $0.025 per
pound to $0.030 per pound of almonds
handled. Of the $0.030 per pound
assessment, 60 percent (or $0.018 per
pound) would be available as creditback for handlers who conduct their
own promotional activities consistent
with § 981.441 of the order’s regulations
and subject to Board approval. The
increased assessment rate is needed
because the 2005–06 crop is projected at
816 million pounds of assessable
almonds, down from the 1.0368 billion
pound 2004–05 crop, and projected
assessment revenue will likely be
reduced. The increased rate should
generate adequate revenue to fund the
Board’s 2005–06 budgeted expenses and
to maintain a small financial reserve.
Section 981.81(c) authorizes a financial
reserve of approximately one-half year’s
budgeted expenses. One-half of the
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:15 Jun 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
2005–06 crop year’s budgeted expenses
of $28,756,000 equals $14,378,000. The
Board’s financial reserve at the end of
the 2005–06 crop year is projected to be
$1.1 million which is well within the
authorized reserve.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Board was derived by considering
anticipated expenses and production
levels of California almonds, and
additional pertinent factors. In its
recommendation, the Board utilized an
estimate of 816 million pounds of
assessable almonds for the 2005–06 crop
year. If realized, this would provide
estimated assessment revenue of
$9,792,000 from all handlers, and an
additional $9,180,000 from those
handlers who do not participate in the
credit-back program, for a total of
$18,972,000. In addition, it is
anticipated that $10,851,797 will be
provided by other sources, including
interest income, MAP funds, grant
funds, miscellaneous income, and
reserve/carryover funds. When
combined, revenue from these sources
would be adequate to cover budgeted
expenses. Any unexpended funds from
the 2005–06 crop year may be carried
over to cover expenses during the
succeeding crop year. Funds in the
reserve at the end of the 2005–06 crop
year are estimated to be approximately
$1.1 million which would be within the
amount permitted by the order.
The proposed assessment rate would
continue in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by
USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the Board or
other available information.
Although this assessment rate would
be in effect for an indefinite period, the
Board will continue to meet prior to or
during each crop year to recommend a
budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of
the assessment rate. The dates and times
of Board meetings are available from the
Board or USDA. Board meetings are
open to the public and interested
persons may express their views at these
meetings. USDA would evaluate Board
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking would be
undertaken as necessary. The Board’s
2005–06 budget and those for
subsequent crop years would be
reviewed and, as appropriate, approved
by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35183
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 6,000
producers of almonds in the production
area and approximately 115 handlers
subject to regulation under the order.
Small agricultural producers are defined
by the Small Business Administration
(13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $6,000,000.
Data for the most recently completed
crop year indicate that about 48 percent
of the handlers shipped over $6,000,000
worth of almonds and about 52 percent
of handlers shipped under $6,000,000
worth of almonds. In addition, based on
production and grower price data
reported by the California Agricultural
Statistics Service (CASS), and the total
number of almond growers, the average
annual grower revenue is estimated to
be approximately $261,248. Based on
the foregoing, the majority of handlers
and producers of almonds may be
classified as small entities.
This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Board and collected from handlers for
the 2005–06 and subsequent crop years
from $0.025 to $0.030 per pound of
almonds. Of the $0.030 per pound
assessment, 60 percent (or $0.018 per
pound) would be available as creditback for handlers who conduct their
own promotional activities consistent
with § 981.441 of the order’s regulations
and subject to Board approval.
The Board met on May 12, 2005, and
unanimously recommended 2005–06
expenditures of $28,756,000 and an
assessment rate of $0.030 per pound. Of
the $0.030 per pound assessment, 60
percent (or $0.018 per pound) would be
available as credit-back for handlers
who conduct their own promotional
activities. The proposed assessment rate
of $0.030 would be $0.005 higher than
the current rate, and the credit-back
portion of $0.018 per pound would be
$0.004 more than the current creditback portion. The quantity of assessable
almonds for the 2005–06 crop year is
estimated at 816,000,000 pounds. The
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
35184
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 116 / Friday, June 17, 2005 / Proposed Rules
proposed assessment rate would
provide estimated assessment revenue
of $9,792,000 from all handlers, and an
additional $9,180,000 from those
handlers who do not participate in the
credit-back program, for a total of
$18,972,000. In addition, it is
anticipated that $10,851,797 will be
provided by other sources, including
interest income, MAP funds, grant
funds, miscellaneous income, and
reserve/carryover funds. When
combined, revenue from these sources
would be adequate to cover budgeted
expenses. The projected financial
reserve at the end of 2005–06 would be
$1,137,797 which would be within the
maximum permitted under the order.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Board for the
2005–06 crop year include $15,423,000
for domestic advertising, market
research, and public relations;
$4,920,000 for operational expenses;
$4,873,000 for international public
relations and other promotion and
education programs, including a MAP
administered by USDA’s FAS;
$1,200,000 for nutrition research;
$850,000 for production research;
$830,000 for food quality programs; and
$500,000 for environmental research,
plus other minor sums. Budgeted
expenses for these items in 2004–05
were $12,540,000 for domestic
advertising, market research, and public
relations; $3,611,981 for operational
expenses; $4,340,000 for international
public relations and other promotion
and education programs, including a
MAP administered by USDA’s FAS;
$1,200,000 for nutrition research;
$947,321 for production research;
$858,000 for food quality programs; and
$460,042 for environmental research,
plus other minor sums.
The Board considered alternative
assessment rate levels, including the
portion available for handler creditback. After deliberating the issue, the
Board recommended increasing the
assessment rate to $0.030 per pound,
with 60 percent (or $0.018 per pound)
available for handler credit-back. In
arriving at its budget, the Board
considered information from its various
committees. Alternative expenditure
levels were discussed by these groups,
based on the value of various activities
to the industry. The committees
ultimately recommended appropriate
activities and funding levels, which
were adopted by the Board.
A review of historical information and
preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming crop year indicates that
the average grower price for the 2005–
06 season could range between $3.00
and $3.50 per pound of almonds.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:15 Jun 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
Therefore, the estimated assessment
revenue for the 2005–06 crop year
(disregarding any amounts credited
pursuant to §§ 981.41 and 981.441) as a
percentage of total grower revenue
could range between 1.00 and 0.86
percent, respectively.
This action would increase the
assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose
some additional costs on handlers, the
costs are minimal and uniform on all
handlers. Some of the additional costs
may be passed on to producers.
However, these costs would be offset by
the benefits derived by the operation of
the marketing order. In addition, the
Board’s meeting was widely publicized
throughout the California almond
industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and
participate in Board deliberations on all
issues. Like all Board meetings, the May
12, 2005, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit information on the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
This proposed rule would impose no
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
California almond handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
A 10-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposed rule. Ten days is
deemed appropriate because: (1) The
2005–06 crop year begins on August 1,
2005, and the order requires that the
rate of assessment for each crop year
apply to all assessable almonds handled
during such crop year; (2) a final
decision on the increase should be made
as soon as possible so handlers can plan
accordingly; (3) the Board needs to have
sufficient funds to pay its expenses
which are incurred on a continuous
basis; and (4) handlers are aware of this
action which was unanimously
recommended by the Board at a public
meeting and is similar to other
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
assessment rate actions issued in past
years.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 981—ALMONDS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 981 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 981.343 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 981.343
Assessment rate.
On and after August 1, 2005, an
assessment rate of $0.030 per pound is
established for California almonds. Of
the $0.030 assessment rate, 60 percent
per assessable pound is available for
handler credit-back.
Dated: June 10, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–12006 Filed 6–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
18 CFR Parts 45, 46, and 131
[Docket No. RM05–13–000]
Electronic Filing of Interlocking
Positions and Twenty Largest
Purchasers Information
May 26, 2005.
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission)
proposes to revise its regulations for
filings by persons holding interlocking
positions and for utilities listing their
twenty largest purchasers of electricity.
The proposed revisions provide for
electronic filing. The modifications in
this Proposed Rule are the result of a
review conducted by the Commission’s
Information Assessment Team (FIAT),
identifying the Commission’s current
information collections, evaluating their
original purposes and current uses, and
proposing ways to reduce the reporting
burden on industry through the
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 116 (Friday, June 17, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35182-35184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12006]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
[Docket No. FV05-981-2 PR]
Almonds Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule would increase the assessment rate established for
the Almond Board of California (Board) for the 2005-06 and subsequent
crop years from $0.025 to $0.030 per pound of almonds received. Of the
$0.030 per pound assessment, 60 percent (or $0.018 per pound) would be
available as credit-back for handlers who conduct their own promotional
activities. The Board locally administers the marketing order which
regulates the handling of almonds grown in California. Authorization to
assess almond handlers enables the Board to incur expenses that are
reasonable and necessary to administer the program. The crop year
begins August 1 and ends July 31. The assessment rate would remain in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by June 27, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938, E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the
docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be available for public inspection in the Office of
the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maureen T. Pello, Senior Marketing
Specialist, California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202
Monterey Street, suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721; telephone: (559)
487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 981, as amended (7 CFR part 981), regulating the handling of
almonds grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California
almond handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the
order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as proposed herein would be applicable to all
assessable almonds beginning August 1, 2005, and continue until
amended, suspended, or terminated. This rule will not preempt any State
or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom.
Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the United States in any district
in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the
petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the
date of the entry of the ruling.
This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the
Board for the 2005-06 and subsequent crop years from $0.025 to $0.030
per pound of almonds received. Of the $0.030 per pound assessment, 60
percent (or $0.018 per pound) would be available as credit-back for
handlers who conduct their own promotional activities.
The order provides authority for the Board, with the approval of
USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect assessments
from handlers to administer the program. The members of the Board are
producers and handlers of California almonds. They are familiar with
the Board's needs and with the costs for goods and services in their
local area and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have
an opportunity to participate and provide input.
For the 2004-05 and subsequent crop years, the Board recommended,
and USDA approved, an assessment rate that would continue in effect
from crop year
[[Page 35183]]
to crop year unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon
recommendation and information submitted by the Board or other
information available to USDA.
The Board met on May 12, 2005, and unanimously recommended 2005-06
expenditures of $28,756,000. In comparison, last year's budgeted
expenditures were $24,077,344. The recommended assessment rate of
$0.030 would be $0.005 higher than the rate currently in effect, and
the credit-back portion of the assessment rate ($0.018 per pound) would
be $0.004 more than the credit-back portion currently in effect.
The major expenditures recommended by the Board for the 2005-06
crop year include $15,423,000 for domestic advertising, market
research, and public relations; $4,920,000 for operational expenses;
$4,873,000 for international public relations and other promotion and
education programs, including a Market Access Program (MAP)
administered by USDA's Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS); $1,200,000
for nutrition research; $850,000 for production research; $830,000 for
food quality programs; and $500,000 for environmental research, plus
other minor sums. Budgeted expenses for these items in 2004-05 were
$12,540,000 for domestic advertising, market research, and public
relations; $3,611,981 for operational expenses; $4,340,000 for
international public relations and other promotion and education
programs, including a MAP administered by USDA's FAS; $1,200,000 for
nutrition research; $947,321 for production research; $858,000 for food
quality programs; and $460,042 for environmental research, plus other
minor sums.
The Board recommended increasing the assessment rate from $0.025
per pound to $0.030 per pound of almonds handled. Of the $0.030 per
pound assessment, 60 percent (or $0.018 per pound) would be available
as credit-back for handlers who conduct their own promotional
activities consistent with Sec. 981.441 of the order's regulations and
subject to Board approval. The increased assessment rate is needed
because the 2005-06 crop is projected at 816 million pounds of
assessable almonds, down from the 1.0368 billion pound 2004-05 crop,
and projected assessment revenue will likely be reduced. The increased
rate should generate adequate revenue to fund the Board's 2005-06
budgeted expenses and to maintain a small financial reserve. Section
981.81(c) authorizes a financial reserve of approximately one-half
year's budgeted expenses. One-half of the 2005-06 crop year's budgeted
expenses of $28,756,000 equals $14,378,000. The Board's financial
reserve at the end of the 2005-06 crop year is projected to be $1.1
million which is well within the authorized reserve.
The assessment rate recommended by the Board was derived by
considering anticipated expenses and production levels of California
almonds, and additional pertinent factors. In its recommendation, the
Board utilized an estimate of 816 million pounds of assessable almonds
for the 2005-06 crop year. If realized, this would provide estimated
assessment revenue of $9,792,000 from all handlers, and an additional
$9,180,000 from those handlers who do not participate in the credit-
back program, for a total of $18,972,000. In addition, it is
anticipated that $10,851,797 will be provided by other sources,
including interest income, MAP funds, grant funds, miscellaneous
income, and reserve/carryover funds. When combined, revenue from these
sources would be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. Any unexpended
funds from the 2005-06 crop year may be carried over to cover expenses
during the succeeding crop year. Funds in the reserve at the end of the
2005-06 crop year are estimated to be approximately $1.1 million which
would be within the amount permitted by the order.
The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation
and information submitted by the Board or other available information.
Although this assessment rate would be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Board will continue to meet prior to or during each crop
year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The dates and times of Board
meetings are available from the Board or USDA. Board meetings are open
to the public and interested persons may express their views at these
meetings. USDA would evaluate Board recommendations and other available
information to determine whether modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking would be undertaken as necessary. The
Board's 2005-06 budget and those for subsequent crop years would be
reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 6,000 producers of almonds in the
production area and approximately 115 handlers subject to regulation
under the order. Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms
are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $6,000,000.
Data for the most recently completed crop year indicate that about
48 percent of the handlers shipped over $6,000,000 worth of almonds and
about 52 percent of handlers shipped under $6,000,000 worth of almonds.
In addition, based on production and grower price data reported by the
California Agricultural Statistics Service (CASS), and the total number
of almond growers, the average annual grower revenue is estimated to be
approximately $261,248. Based on the foregoing, the majority of
handlers and producers of almonds may be classified as small entities.
This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the
Board and collected from handlers for the 2005-06 and subsequent crop
years from $0.025 to $0.030 per pound of almonds. Of the $0.030 per
pound assessment, 60 percent (or $0.018 per pound) would be available
as credit-back for handlers who conduct their own promotional
activities consistent with Sec. 981.441 of the order's regulations and
subject to Board approval.
The Board met on May 12, 2005, and unanimously recommended 2005-06
expenditures of $28,756,000 and an assessment rate of $0.030 per pound.
Of the $0.030 per pound assessment, 60 percent (or $0.018 per pound)
would be available as credit-back for handlers who conduct their own
promotional activities. The proposed assessment rate of $0.030 would be
$0.005 higher than the current rate, and the credit-back portion of
$0.018 per pound would be $0.004 more than the current credit-back
portion. The quantity of assessable almonds for the 2005-06 crop year
is estimated at 816,000,000 pounds. The
[[Page 35184]]
proposed assessment rate would provide estimated assessment revenue of
$9,792,000 from all handlers, and an additional $9,180,000 from those
handlers who do not participate in the credit-back program, for a total
of $18,972,000. In addition, it is anticipated that $10,851,797 will be
provided by other sources, including interest income, MAP funds, grant
funds, miscellaneous income, and reserve/carryover funds. When
combined, revenue from these sources would be adequate to cover
budgeted expenses. The projected financial reserve at the end of 2005-
06 would be $1,137,797 which would be within the maximum permitted
under the order.
The major expenditures recommended by the Board for the 2005-06
crop year include $15,423,000 for domestic advertising, market
research, and public relations; $4,920,000 for operational expenses;
$4,873,000 for international public relations and other promotion and
education programs, including a MAP administered by USDA's FAS;
$1,200,000 for nutrition research; $850,000 for production research;
$830,000 for food quality programs; and $500,000 for environmental
research, plus other minor sums. Budgeted expenses for these items in
2004-05 were $12,540,000 for domestic advertising, market research, and
public relations; $3,611,981 for operational expenses; $4,340,000 for
international public relations and other promotion and education
programs, including a MAP administered by USDA's FAS; $1,200,000 for
nutrition research; $947,321 for production research; $858,000 for food
quality programs; and $460,042 for environmental research, plus other
minor sums.
The Board considered alternative assessment rate levels, including
the portion available for handler credit-back. After deliberating the
issue, the Board recommended increasing the assessment rate to $0.030
per pound, with 60 percent (or $0.018 per pound) available for handler
credit-back. In arriving at its budget, the Board considered
information from its various committees. Alternative expenditure levels
were discussed by these groups, based on the value of various
activities to the industry. The committees ultimately recommended
appropriate activities and funding levels, which were adopted by the
Board.
A review of historical information and preliminary information
pertaining to the upcoming crop year indicates that the average grower
price for the 2005-06 season could range between $3.00 and $3.50 per
pound of almonds. Therefore, the estimated assessment revenue for the
2005-06 crop year (disregarding any amounts credited pursuant to
Sec. Sec. 981.41 and 981.441) as a percentage of total grower revenue
could range between 1.00 and 0.86 percent, respectively.
This action would increase the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the
additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs
would be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the
marketing order. In addition, the Board's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the California almond industry and all interested persons
were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Board
deliberations on all issues. Like all Board meetings, the May 12, 2005,
meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested persons
are invited to submit information on the regulatory and informational
impacts of this action on small businesses.
This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California almond
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
A 10-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposed rule. Ten days is deemed appropriate because:
(1) The 2005-06 crop year begins on August 1, 2005, and the order
requires that the rate of assessment for each crop year apply to all
assessable almonds handled during such crop year; (2) a final decision
on the increase should be made as soon as possible so handlers can plan
accordingly; (3) the Board needs to have sufficient funds to pay its
expenses which are incurred on a continuous basis; and (4) handlers are
aware of this action which was unanimously recommended by the Board at
a public meeting and is similar to other assessment rate actions issued
in past years.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 981--ALMONDS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 981 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. Section 981.343 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 981.343 Assessment rate.
On and after August 1, 2005, an assessment rate of $0.030 per pound
is established for California almonds. Of the $0.030 assessment rate,
60 percent per assessable pound is available for handler credit-back.
Dated: June 10, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-12006 Filed 6-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P