Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Management Strategies/Regulations in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, 34746-34747 [05-11823]
Download as PDF
34746
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 15, 2005 / Notices
no later than 12 p.m. on Monday, June
20, 2005. Please include your name,
phone number, and organization
affiliation.
For Further Information Contact:
Sarah E. Aker, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Manufacturing and
Services, Department of Commerce,
Room 3832, 1401 Constitution Ave.,
Washington, DC 20230 (phone: 202–
482–1112).
Dated: June 10, 2005.
Sarah E. Aker,
Deputy Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 05–11841 Filed 6–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free Trade Agreement,
Article 1904 NAFTA Panel Reviews;
Notice of Panel Decision
NAFTA Secretariat, United
States Section, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of panel decision.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On June 9, 2005, the
binational panel issued its decision in
the review of the final results of the
affirmative antidumping duty redetermination on remand made by the
International Trade Administration
(ITA) respecting Certain Softwood
Lumber Products from Canada
(Secretariat File No. USA–CDA–2002–
1904–02) affirmed in part and remanded
in part the determination of the
Department of Commerce. The
Department will return the redetermination on remand not later than
July 11, 2005. A copy of the complete
panel decision is available from the
NAFTA Secretariat.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caratina L. Alston, United States
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite
2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter
19 of the North American Free-Trade
Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) establishes a
mechanism to replace domestic judicial
review of final determinations in
antidumping and countervailing duty
cases involving imports from the other
country with review by independent
binational panels. When a request for
panel review is filed, a panel is
established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final
determination to determine whether it
conforms with the antidumping or
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:57 Jun 14, 2005
Jkt 205001
countervailing duty law of the country
that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement,
which came into force on January 1,
1994, the Government of the United
States, the Government of Canada and
the Government of Mexico established
Rules of Procedure for Article 1904
Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’).
These rules were published in the
Federal Register on February 23, 1994
(59 FR 8686).
Panel Decision: On June 9, 2005, the
Binational Panel affirmed in part and
remanded in part the Department of
Commerce’s final antidumping duty
determination on remand. The
following issues were remanded to the
Department:
1. To render a negative less than fair
value (LTFV) determination with
respect to exports by respondent West
Fraser Mills, and to revoke the
antidumping duty order on Softwood
Lumber from Canada with respect to
exports by West Fraser Mills; and it is
further ordered that
2. The Panel remands this case to the
Department, with instructions for the
Department to recalculate the final
LTFV margins for respondents other
than West Fraser without regard to
‘‘zeroing’’.
The Panel affirmed Commerce’s
amended final LTFV determination with
respect to all other issues.
Commerce was directed to issue its
determination on remand within 30
days of the issuance of the panel
decision or not later than July 11, 2005.
Dated: June 9, 2005.
Caratina L. Alston,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. E5–3070 Filed 6–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Knowledge,
Attitudes, and Perceptions of
Management Strategies/Regulations in
the Florida Keys National Marine
Sanctuary
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
DOC.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before August 15, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Dr. Vernon R. (Bob
Leeworthy, 301–713–3000 ext. 138 or
Bob.Leeworthy@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The purpose of this effort is to do an
approximate 10-year replication of a
1995–96 study that established baseline
information on the knowledge, attitudes
and perceptions of management
strategies and regulations of the Florida
Keys National Marine Sanctuary
(FKNMS). The baseline was conducted
for three user groups: (1) Commercial
fishermen, (2) Dive Shop Owners/
Operators, and (3) members of three
local environmental groups (Last Stand,
Reef Relief, and Sanctuary Friends). In
1998, the Socioeconomic Research and
Monitoring Program for the FKNMS was
established and the 1995–96 study
results were incorporated as baseline
measures.
The National Marine Sanctuaries Act
(16 U.S.C. 1431, et seq.) authorizes the
use of monitoring within National
Marine Sanctuaries (NMS). The Florida
Keys National Marine Sanctuary and
Protection Act (Public Law 101–605,
Sec 7 (5)) also authorizes monitoring.
The Management Plan and regulations
for the FKNMS were not implemented
until July 1997, which established 22
Sanctuary Preservation Areas (SPAs)
and one Ecological Reserve (ER) that are
‘‘no take’’ zones. Another ER, the
Tortugas, was established as part of a
two-year public process and its
regulations went into effect in July 2002.
All consumptive or take activities were
displaced from these zones. Eighteen
(18) of the SPAs were also created to
resolve user conflicts, while four were
set aside for ‘‘Research Only.’’ In
creating these special zones,
socioeconomic impact analyses were
done as required under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In
addition, a Regulatory Impact Review
and an Initial and Final Regulatory
E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM
15JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 15, 2005 / Notices
Flexibility Analysis (if small businesses
are potentially impacted by the no take
regulations) were conducted. However,
many of the benefits and costs identified
in these analyses are speculative in
nature and therefore a great deal of
uncertainty about both the benefits and
the costs. The 10-year replication of the
1995–96 study will support an
assessment of any changes in
knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of
the no-take areas and establish new
baselines on several new regulations
established since 1995–96.
II. Method of Collection
Paper questionnaires and in-person
interviews will be used to collect
information.
III. Data
OMB Number: None.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; business or other for-profits
organizations; not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
255.
Estimated Time Per Response: 2
hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 491.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: June 9, 2005.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–11823 Filed 6–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:57 Jun 14, 2005
Jkt 205001
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
Information Collection; Submission for
OMB Review, Comment Request
Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National
and Community Service (hereinafter
‘‘Corporation’’), in proposing the
renewal of its Learn and Serve America
(hereinafter ‘‘LSA’’) grant applications,
has submitted two public information
collection requests (ICRs) entitled the
Learn and Serve America School- and
Community-Based Application
Instructions and the Learn and Serve
America Higher Education Application
Instructions to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Pub. L. 104–13, (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Copies of this ICR, with applicable
supporting documentation, may be
obtained by calling the Corporation for
National and Community Service, Mr.
Mark Abbott, at (202) 606–5000, ext.
120. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TTY–TDD) may call (202) 565–2799
between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. eastern
time, Monday through Friday.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted, identified by the title of the
information collection activity, to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attn: Ms. Katherine Astrich,
OMB Desk Officer for the Corporation
for National and Community Service, by
either of the following two methods
within 30 days from the date of
publication in this Federal Register:
(1) By fax to: (202) 395–6974,
Attention: Ms. Katherine Astrich, OMB
Desk Officer for the Corporation for
National and Community Service; and
(2) Electronically by e-mail to:
Katherine_T._Astrich@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OMB
is particularly interested in comments
which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Corporation, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Propose ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34747
• Propose ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses.
Comments
A 60-day public comment notice was
published in the Federal Register on
February 2, 2005. This comment period
ended April 2, 2005. No public
comments were received from this
notice.
Description: The Corporation is
seeking approval of the LSA Grant
Application Instructions, which will
assist organizations interested in
managing a service-learning program
directly or administering grant funds to
other eligible organizations in applying
for LSA funds.
The Information provided in the
applications will be used by Learn and
Serve America peer reviewers and staff
to ensure the highest quality
applications are selected for funding.
Yearly updates to these applications
will also be used to determine grantee
eligibility for second and third year
Continuation Grants, which are
available to Learn and Serve America
grantees subject to funding availability
and adequate progress towards meeting
performance measures.
Type of Review: Renewal.
Agency: Corporation for National and
Community Service.
Title: Learn and Serve America
Application Instructions.
OMB Number: 3045–0045 for Learn
and Serve America School and
Community-Based Application
Instructions and 3045–0046 for Learn
and Serve America Higher Education
Application Instructions.
Agency Number: SF 424–NSSC.
Affected Public: Current/prospective
recipients of Learn and Serve America
Grants.
Total Respondents: 600 (400 for
3045–0045 and 200 for 3045-0046).
Frequency: Annually.
Average Time Per Response: 10 hours
for new applicants, 5 hours for
Continuation applicants.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 6000
hours annually in years with a new
competition; 520 hours annually in
years with Continuation requests only.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
None.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintenance): $240,000.
E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM
15JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34746-34747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-11823]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Knowledge,
Attitudes, and Perceptions of Management Strategies/Regulations in the
Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary
AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), DOC.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before August 15, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th
and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should
be directed to Dr. Vernon R. (Bob Leeworthy, 301-713-3000 ext. 138 or
Bob.Leeworthy@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The purpose of this effort is to do an approximate 10-year
replication of a 1995-96 study that established baseline information on
the knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of management strategies and
regulations of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS). The
baseline was conducted for three user groups: (1) Commercial fishermen,
(2) Dive Shop Owners/Operators, and (3) members of three local
environmental groups (Last Stand, Reef Relief, and Sanctuary Friends).
In 1998, the Socioeconomic Research and Monitoring Program for the
FKNMS was established and the 1995-96 study results were incorporated
as baseline measures.
The National Marine Sanctuaries Act (16 U.S.C. 1431, et seq.)
authorizes the use of monitoring within National Marine Sanctuaries
(NMS). The Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary and Protection Act
(Public Law 101-605, Sec 7 (5)) also authorizes monitoring. The
Management Plan and regulations for the FKNMS were not implemented
until July 1997, which established 22 Sanctuary Preservation Areas
(SPAs) and one Ecological Reserve (ER) that are ``no take'' zones.
Another ER, the Tortugas, was established as part of a two-year public
process and its regulations went into effect in July 2002. All
consumptive or take activities were displaced from these zones.
Eighteen (18) of the SPAs were also created to resolve user conflicts,
while four were set aside for ``Research Only.'' In creating these
special zones, socioeconomic impact analyses were done as required
under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In addition, a
Regulatory Impact Review and an Initial and Final Regulatory
[[Page 34747]]
Flexibility Analysis (if small businesses are potentially impacted by
the no take regulations) were conducted. However, many of the benefits
and costs identified in these analyses are speculative in nature and
therefore a great deal of uncertainty about both the benefits and the
costs. The 10-year replication of the 1995-96 study will support an
assessment of any changes in knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of
the no-take areas and establish new baselines on several new
regulations established since 1995-96.
II. Method of Collection
Paper questionnaires and in-person interviews will be used to
collect information.
III. Data
OMB Number: None.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals or households; business or other for-
profits organizations; not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 255.
Estimated Time Per Response: 2 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 491.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: June 9, 2005.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-11823 Filed 6-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-NK-P