Southwestern Region, Arizona, New Mexico, West Texas and Oklahoma: Proposed Land and Resource Management Plan Amendment for the Valle Vidal, Carson National Forest, Taos and Colfax Counties, NM, 34441-34442 [05-11702]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
34441
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 113
Tuesday, June 14, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
Additional information related to the
proposed amendment can be obtained
from the Forest’s Web page at https://
www.fs.fed.us/r3/carson/ or directly
from the Forest on compact disc or a
paper copy.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
information presented in this notice is
included to help the reviewer determine
if they are interested in or potentially
affected by the proposed action.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Purpose and Need for Action
In 1982, Pennzoil Corporation
donated 101,794 acres (Valle Vidal) to
the American people. Due to the timing
of the donation, the lack of resource
inventories, and the fact the Carson
National Forest had already begun the
development of its Land and Resource
Management Plan (Forest Plan), the
management of the Valle Vidal was only
partially considered in the development
of the Forest Plan. Timber suitability
was analyzed as part of plan
development, however a desired
condition and standards and guidelines
for the Valle Vidal were never
established. A Multiple Use Area Guide
was developed in October 1982 and
provides general direction for the Valle
Vidal.
In order to bring management
direction for the Valle Vidal into full
conformance with the Carson National
Forest’s Forest Plan, an amendment is
needed to establish Forest Plan natural
resource goals, objectives, standards and
guidelines, and desired future condition
for the Valle Vidal. The plan
amendment will speak directly to the
desired condition, with standards and
guidelines needed to meet this desired
condition.
Forest Service
Southwestern Region, Arizona, New
Mexico, West Texas and Oklahoma:
Proposed Land and Resource
Management Plan Amendment for the
Valle Vidal, Carson National Forest,
Taos and Colfax Counties, NM
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of Intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The USDA Forest Service is
preparing an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to consider and disclose
the effects of amending the Carson
National Forest’s 1987 Land and
Resource Management Plan (hereafter
called Forest Plan) to incorporate
standards and guidelines for the
management of the Valle Vidal area of
the Carson National Forest. The
proposed Forest Plan amendment
includes a recommendation for a special
area designation of the ‘‘Upper Ponil
Botanical Area.’’
DATES: Comments on the proposed
amendment should be submitted before
September 15, 2005.
The Draft EIS is expected to be
available for public review sometime in
February or March 2006. At that time,
a Notice of Availability for the Draft EIS
will be published in the Federal
Register and a 90-day comment period
will follow. The Final EIS is scheduled
to be completed in September 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning the
proposed amendment should be sent to
Carson National Forest, ATTN: Valle
Vidal Forest Plan Amendment, 208 Cruz
Alta Road, Toas, NM 87571. E-mail
comments may be sent to commentssouthwestern-carson@fs.fed.us. ‘‘Valle
Vidal Forest Plan Amendment’’ must be
in the subject line of the e-mail.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Seesholtz, Forest Planner, Carson
National Forest, at (505) 758–6210.
SUMMARY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:14 Jun 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
Proposed Action
The Forest Service proposes to
provide additional guidance for the
Valle Vidal Unit on the Carson National
Forest through a Forest Plan
amendment. This area was identified as
Management Area 21 in the Land and
Resource Management Plan (1986).
The proposed action would establish
a long-term desired condition for the
Valle Vidal and would incorporate
Forest-wide prescriptions and specific
Management Area prescriptions
(standards and guidelines) from the
current Forest Plan to apply on the Valle
Vidal.
Area specific standards and
guidelines for the Valle Vidal are also
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposed. Standards and guidelines
specific to the Valle Vidal would take
precedence over Forest-wide standards
and guidelines. Generally these
standards compliment the Forest-wide
standards.
The proposed action would
recommend a 4,083-acre botanical area
as a Special Area (Management Area
19). A few specific standards and
guidelines are proposed for this
management area.
A detailed description of the
Proposed Action can be accessed via the
Internet at https://www.fs.fed.us/r3/
carson/. This site also contains
background information about the
management of the Valle Vidal and
discussion on why additional
management direction is needed for the
area.
Public Involvement
Over the last several months, the
Forest has received from the public over
5,000 form letters, 120 post cards, 600
individual letters, a petition and many
phone calls expressing their views on
the management of the Valle Vidal.
Open house informational meetings
were held in Taos, Raton and Santa Fe
earlier this year. Comments raised
during these meetings, as well as other
public comments, helped in formulating
the proposed action is largely to
formalize the current management
strategy.
Additional open house meetings will
be held in July and august during the
scoping period. These meetings are
tentatively scheduled for Taos, Raton,
and Santa Fe. Due to the large amount
of public interest expressed in the
development of the proposed action the
scoping will run for 90 days.
Preliminary Issues and Alternatives
The Forest Service has developed the
proposed action to meet the purpose
and need for action with the best
information available—it is not a
decision. This proposal is intended to
facilitate public involvement in
identifying pertinent issues, developing
meaningful alternatives, and analyzing
relevant effects. A range of alternatives,
including the no action alternative, will
be developed based upon issues
identified during our scoping process
and the associated analysis.
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
34442
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 14, 2005 / Notices
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
USDA Forest Service, Carson National
Forest will serve as the lead agency for
this analysis.
Responsible Official
The Forest Supervisor for the Carson
National Forest of the Southwestern
Region of the USDA Forest Service is
the Responsible Official.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Forest Plans define the direction for
managing the National Forests. This
amendment will provide the
management direction for the Valle
Vidal and provide the foundation for
future activities. The amendment
defines the overall management vision
of the Valle Vidal and identifies specific
standards and guidelines that will help
move management of the Valle Vidal
towards this vision. The decision made
through this amendment would serve as
Forest Plan direction until the Forest
Plan is further amended or revised.
Other analyses may be completed in
the future to determine the appropriate
level of activities to occur by a specific
program. The Leasing Analysis required
to determine whether to make certain
lands available to development of
natural gas resources is an example of
possible future analyses. Future
decisions would have to be consistent
with the management direction
provided through this current analysis
or would have to amend this direction.
Comment Requested
The Forest Service would like to
know of any issues, concerns, and/or
suggestions the public, Native American
tribes, or other government agencies
have about the proposal. Comments
should be as fully formed as possible to
assist in the analysis. If you have any
questions, or if something is unclear,
contact David Seesholtz at 505–758–
6210 before submitting your comments.
Although comments are welcome at
any time, they will be most effective if
received by September 15, 2005. Send
comment to: Carson National Forest,
ATTN: Valle Vidal Plan Amendment,
208 Cruz Alta Road, Taos, NM 87571.
Alternately, e-mail your commentsto
comments-southwesterncarson@fs.fed.us. ‘‘Valle Vidal Forest
Plan Amendment’’ must be in the
subject line of the e-mail.
Reviewer’s Obligation: Comments
received in response to this solicitation,
including names and addresses of those
who comment, will be considered part
of the public record on this proposed
action and will be available for public
inspection. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:14 Jun 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
considered; however, those who submit
anonymous comments will not have
standing to appeal the subsequent
decision under 36 CFR parts 215 or 217.
Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27
(d), any person may request the agency
to withhold a submission from the
public record by showing how the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
permits such confidentiality. Persons
requesting such confidentiality should
be aware that, under FOIA,
confidentiality may be granted in only
very limited circumstances, such as to
protect trade secrets. The Forest Service
will inform the requester of the agency’s
decision regarding the request for
confidentiality, and where the request is
denied, the agency will return the
submission and notify the requester that
the comments may be resubmitted with
or without name and address within
seven days.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts the agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
stage but that are not raised nolil after
completion of the final environmental
impact statement may be waived or
dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon
v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc., 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wise. 1980).
Because of these court rulings, it is very
important that those interested in this
proposed action participate by the close
of the comment period so that
substantive comments and objections
are made available to the Forest Service
at the time when it can meaningfully
consider them and respond to them in
the final environmental impact
statement. PAuthorization: National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4321–346); Council
on Environmental Quality Regulations
(40 CFR parts 1500–1508); U.S.
Department of Agriculture NEPA
Policies and Procedures (7 CFR part 1b).
Dated: June 8, 2005.
Martin D. Chavez Jr.,
Forest Supervisor, Carson National Forest.
[FR Doc. 05–11702 Filed 6–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Dakota Prairie Grasslands; North
Dakota and South Dakota; Dakota
Prairie Grasslands Noxious Weed
Management Strategy EIS
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Dakota Prairie Grasslands
(DPG) proposes to use an integrated
approach to treat and control noxious
weeds on approximately 35,000 acres of
existing infestation sites, and 8,000
acres of new or previously unknown
acres in a manner consistent with
Dakota Prairie Grasslands Land and
Resource Management Plan direction
and applicable laws. The Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) will analyze the
methods to be used in an integrated
approach, and disclose the
environmental effects of the proposal
and alternatives.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received within
30 days of publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. The draft EIS is
expected by September 2005 and the
final EIS is expected by February 2006.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Sheila McNee, Noxious Weed EIS,
Dakota Prairie Grasslands, 240 W.
Century Ave., Bismarck, ND 58503 or email your comments to commentsnorthern-dakota-prairie@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sheila McNee, Project Leader, Dakota
Prairie Grasslands, USDA Forest Service
at the above address or call (701) 250–
4443.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
An aggressive and effective weed
control program is dictated by U.S.
Forest Service policies (FSM 2080), the
DPG Land and Resource Management
Plan (Grasslands Plan), other Forest
Service objectives, and by the February
3, 1999 Executive Order 13112 ‘‘to
prevent the introduction of invasive
species and provide for their control
and to minimize the economic,
ecological and human health impacts
that invasive species cause.’’ The DPG
has been treating noxious weeds on
each Ranger District under previous
NEPA decisions including the 1986
Custer National Forest Noxious Weed
Environmental Impact Statement;
however, an updated noxious weed
control analysis is needed to address
newly listed noxious weeds species, to
identify additional acres of noxious
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34441-34442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-11702]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 14, 2005 /
Notices
[[Page 34441]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Southwestern Region, Arizona, New Mexico, West Texas and
Oklahoma: Proposed Land and Resource Management Plan Amendment for the
Valle Vidal, Carson National Forest, Taos and Colfax Counties, NM
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service is preparing an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to consider and disclose the effects of amending the
Carson National Forest's 1987 Land and Resource Management Plan
(hereafter called Forest Plan) to incorporate standards and guidelines
for the management of the Valle Vidal area of the Carson National
Forest. The proposed Forest Plan amendment includes a recommendation
for a special area designation of the ``Upper Ponil Botanical Area.''
DATES: Comments on the proposed amendment should be submitted before
September 15, 2005.
The Draft EIS is expected to be available for public review
sometime in February or March 2006. At that time, a Notice of
Availability for the Draft EIS will be published in the Federal
Register and a 90-day comment period will follow. The Final EIS is
scheduled to be completed in September 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning the proposed amendment should be sent to
Carson National Forest, ATTN: Valle Vidal Forest Plan Amendment, 208
Cruz Alta Road, Toas, NM 87571. E-mail comments may be sent to
comments-southwestern-carson@fs.fed.us. ``Valle Vidal Forest Plan
Amendment'' must be in the subject line of the e-mail.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Seesholtz, Forest Planner,
Carson National Forest, at (505) 758-6210. Additional information
related to the proposed amendment can be obtained from the Forest's Web
page at https://www.fs.fed.us/r3/carson/ or directly from the Forest on
compact disc or a paper copy.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information presented in this notice is
included to help the reviewer determine if they are interested in or
potentially affected by the proposed action.
Purpose and Need for Action
In 1982, Pennzoil Corporation donated 101,794 acres (Valle Vidal)
to the American people. Due to the timing of the donation, the lack of
resource inventories, and the fact the Carson National Forest had
already begun the development of its Land and Resource Management Plan
(Forest Plan), the management of the Valle Vidal was only partially
considered in the development of the Forest Plan. Timber suitability
was analyzed as part of plan development, however a desired condition
and standards and guidelines for the Valle Vidal were never
established. A Multiple Use Area Guide was developed in October 1982
and provides general direction for the Valle Vidal.
In order to bring management direction for the Valle Vidal into
full conformance with the Carson National Forest's Forest Plan, an
amendment is needed to establish Forest Plan natural resource goals,
objectives, standards and guidelines, and desired future condition for
the Valle Vidal. The plan amendment will speak directly to the desired
condition, with standards and guidelines needed to meet this desired
condition.
Proposed Action
The Forest Service proposes to provide additional guidance for the
Valle Vidal Unit on the Carson National Forest through a Forest Plan
amendment. This area was identified as Management Area 21 in the Land
and Resource Management Plan (1986).
The proposed action would establish a long-term desired condition
for the Valle Vidal and would incorporate Forest-wide prescriptions and
specific Management Area prescriptions (standards and guidelines) from
the current Forest Plan to apply on the Valle Vidal.
Area specific standards and guidelines for the Valle Vidal are also
proposed. Standards and guidelines specific to the Valle Vidal would
take precedence over Forest-wide standards and guidelines. Generally
these standards compliment the Forest-wide standards.
The proposed action would recommend a 4,083-acre botanical area as
a Special Area (Management Area 19). A few specific standards and
guidelines are proposed for this management area.
A detailed description of the Proposed Action can be accessed via
the Internet at https://www.fs.fed.us/r3/carson/. This site also
contains background information about the management of the Valle Vidal
and discussion on why additional management direction is needed for the
area.
Public Involvement
Over the last several months, the Forest has received from the
public over 5,000 form letters, 120 post cards, 600 individual letters,
a petition and many phone calls expressing their views on the
management of the Valle Vidal. Open house informational meetings were
held in Taos, Raton and Santa Fe earlier this year. Comments raised
during these meetings, as well as other public comments, helped in
formulating the proposed action is largely to formalize the current
management strategy.
Additional open house meetings will be held in July and august
during the scoping period. These meetings are tentatively scheduled for
Taos, Raton, and Santa Fe. Due to the large amount of public interest
expressed in the development of the proposed action the scoping will
run for 90 days.
Preliminary Issues and Alternatives
The Forest Service has developed the proposed action to meet the
purpose and need for action with the best information available--it is
not a decision. This proposal is intended to facilitate public
involvement in identifying pertinent issues, developing meaningful
alternatives, and analyzing relevant effects. A range of alternatives,
including the no action alternative, will be developed based upon
issues identified during our scoping process and the associated
analysis.
[[Page 34442]]
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
USDA Forest Service, Carson National Forest will serve as the lead
agency for this analysis.
Responsible Official
The Forest Supervisor for the Carson National Forest of the
Southwestern Region of the USDA Forest Service is the Responsible
Official.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Forest Plans define the direction for managing the National
Forests. This amendment will provide the management direction for the
Valle Vidal and provide the foundation for future activities. The
amendment defines the overall management vision of the Valle Vidal and
identifies specific standards and guidelines that will help move
management of the Valle Vidal towards this vision. The decision made
through this amendment would serve as Forest Plan direction until the
Forest Plan is further amended or revised.
Other analyses may be completed in the future to determine the
appropriate level of activities to occur by a specific program. The
Leasing Analysis required to determine whether to make certain lands
available to development of natural gas resources is an example of
possible future analyses. Future decisions would have to be consistent
with the management direction provided through this current analysis or
would have to amend this direction.
Comment Requested
The Forest Service would like to know of any issues, concerns, and/
or suggestions the public, Native American tribes, or other government
agencies have about the proposal. Comments should be as fully formed as
possible to assist in the analysis. If you have any questions, or if
something is unclear, contact David Seesholtz at 505-758-6210 before
submitting your comments.
Although comments are welcome at any time, they will be most
effective if received by September 15, 2005. Send comment to: Carson
National Forest, ATTN: Valle Vidal Plan Amendment, 208 Cruz Alta Road,
Taos, NM 87571.
Alternately, e-mail your commentsto comments-southwestern-
carson@fs.fed.us. ``Valle Vidal Forest Plan Amendment'' must be in the
subject line of the e-mail.
Reviewer's Obligation: Comments received in response to this
solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will
be considered part of the public record on this proposed action and
will be available for public inspection. Comments submitted anonymously
will be accepted and considered; however, those who submit anonymous
comments will not have standing to appeal the subsequent decision under
36 CFR parts 215 or 217. Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27 (d), any
person may request the agency to withhold a submission from the public
record by showing how the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits
such confidentiality. Persons requesting such confidentiality should be
aware that, under FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only very
limited circumstances, such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest
Service will inform the requester of the agency's decision regarding
the request for confidentiality, and where the request is denied, the
agency will return the submission and notify the requester that the
comments may be resubmitted with or without name and address within
seven days.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts the agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact stage but that are not raised nolil after
completion of the final environmental impact statement may be waived or
dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022
(9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc., 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338
(E.D. Wise. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed action participate by the close
of the comment period so that substantive comments and objections are
made available to the Forest Service at the time when it can
meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement. PAuthorization: National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321-346); Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508); U.S.
Department of Agriculture NEPA Policies and Procedures (7 CFR part 1b).
Dated: June 8, 2005.
Martin D. Chavez Jr.,
Forest Supervisor, Carson National Forest.
[FR Doc. 05-11702 Filed 6-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
