Central Valley Project Improvement Act, Water Management Plans, 34148-34149 [05-11615]

Download as PDF 34148 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 112 / Monday, June 13, 2005 / Notices be refilled when the bottles contain any liquid or other ingredient not placed in the bottles by the original manufacturer. (f) It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any vendor to sell or furnish any alcoholic beverage to a person unless that person has attained 21 years of age. No vendor may knowingly sell or furnish any alcoholic beverage to a person who is younger than 21 years of age, or fail to make diligent inquiry as to whether the person is 21 years of age. A suitable sign which describes this section and the penalties for violating this section shall be posted in a conspicuous place in each room where alcoholic beverages are sold. (g) It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any vendor to sell or furnish any alcoholic beverage to any person who is visibly intoxicated at the time, or who is known to the vendor to be a habitual drunkard. (h) It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any person younger than 21 years of age to purchase, attempt to purchase, possess or consume any alcoholic beverage, or for such a person to misrepresent his age for the purpose of purchasing or attempting to purchase such alcoholic beverage. (i) Upon attempt to purchase any alcoholic beverage on premises licensed under this ordinance by any person who appears to the vendor to be younger than 21 years of age, that vendor shall demand, and the prospective purchaser upon such demand shall display, satisfactory evidence that he is of legal age. It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any person to present to any vendor falsified evidence as to his age. (j) No person licensed under this ordinance shall make any delivery of any alcoholic beverage outside the premises described in the license. (k) No person, directly or indirectly, himself or herself or by his or her clerk, agent or employee shall manufacture, manufacture for sale, sell, offer or keep for sale, barter, furnish, or import, import for sale, transport for hire, or transport, or possess any alcoholic beverage unless that person complies with this ordinance. (l) In order to retain its alcoholic beverage license under this ordinance, any Tribal operation is required to comply with other applicable Tribal law, as well as with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 7. Tribal Alcoholic Beverage Licenses (a) Upon written application by a Tribal representative, the Tribal Council may issue a license authorizing (1) the sale of alcoholic beverages intended solely for consumption on the premises, and/or (2) the sale of alcoholic beverages intended solely for consumption away from the premises. (b) All such license applications must set forth the purpose for which the license is sought, together with a description of the premises upon which the alcoholic beverage sales are proposed to take place. (c) In its sole discretion, the Tribal Council shall have the power and authority to determine the numbers and types of alcoholic beverage licenses to be issued pursuant to this ordinance. VerDate jul<14>2003 16:45 Jun 10, 2005 Jkt 205001 Section 8. Complaint of Violation (a) Any complaint regarding violation of any provision of this ordinance shall be referred to the Tribal Prosecutor, who may cause such complaint to be placed in writing and served personally or by registered mail upon the licensee or other person against whom that complaint is made. (b) A hearing on any such complaint shall be held by the Tribal Court not less than 7 days nor more than 28 days after service of the complaint upon the licensee or other person against whom that complaint is made. (c) Any Indian person (defined in Section 3.201 of the Tribe’s Criminal Code) who violates any provision of this ordinance may be charged with a misdemeanor criminal offense and may be prosecuted pursuant to Section 3.718 of the Tribe’s Criminal Code. If convicted, the Tribal Court may impose a fine of not greater than $1000.00, or imprisonment not exceeding 60 days in the Tribal jail, or by both such fine and imprisonment. (d) Any non-Indian person who violates any provision of this ordinance may be charged with and prosecuted for a civil offense, and if convicted, may be subject to civil sanctions which the Tribal Council may prescribe, and/or may be excluded from Tribal lands. (e) Any person under the jurisdiction of the Tribe who violates any provision of this ordinance for which a specific penalty is not provided, shall be subject to a fine of not less than $100.00, nor more than $5000.00, or by imprisonment in the Tribal jail for not more than 60 days, or by both such fine and imprisonment, plus costs. Section 9. Severability (a) If any section or provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any party or class, or to any circumstances, shall be held to be invalid for any cause whatsoever, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected thereby and shall remain in full force and effect as though no part thereof had been declared to be invalid. (b) All prior ordinances and resolutions or provisions thereof which are repugnant to or inconsistent with any provision of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 10. Amendment or Repeal of This Ordinance This ordinance may be amended or repealed only by majority vote of the Tribal Council in regular session. Section 11. Effective Date The effective date of this ordinance shall be the date upon which it is certified by the Secretary or his delegate and published in the Federal Register in accordance with Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1161. [FR Doc. 05–11609 Filed 6–10–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–4J–P PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Reclamation Central Valley Project Improvement Act, Water Management Plans Bureau of Reclamation, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The following Water Management Plans are available for review: • James Irrigation District • Lindmore Irrigation District • City of Lindsay • Southern San Joaquin Municipal Utility District • Suisan Solano Water Authority • Tranquillity Irrigation District To meet the requirements of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act of 1992 (CVPIA) and the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982, the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has developed and published the Criteria for Evaluating Water Management Plans (Criteria). Note: For the purpose of this announcement, Water Management Plans (Plans) are considered the same as Water Conservation Plans. The above districts have developed Plans, which Reclamation has evaluated and preliminarily determined to meet the requirements of these Criteria. Reclamation is publishing this notice in order to allow the public to review the Plans and comment on the preliminary determinations. Public comment on Reclamation’s preliminary (i.e., draft) determination is invited at this time. All public comments must be received by July 13, 2005. ADDRESSES: Please mail comments to Leslie Barbre, Bureau of Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, California 95825, or contact at 916–978– 5232 (TDD 978–5608), or e-mail at lbarbre@mp.usbr.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To be placed on a mailing list for any subsequent information, please contact Ms. Barbre at the e-mail address or telephone number above. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are inviting the public to comment on our preliminary (i.e., draft) determination of Plan adequacy. Section 3405(e) of the CVPIA (Title 34 Pub. L. 102–575) requires the Secretary of the Interior to establish and administer an office on Central Valley Project water conservation best management practices (BMPs) that shall * * * develop criteria for evaluating the adequacy of all water conservation plans developed by project contractors, including those plans required by Section 210 of the DATES: E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM 13JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 112 / Monday, June 13, 2005 / Notices Reclamation Reform Act of 1982.’’ Also, according to Section 3405(e)(1), these Criteria must be developed ‘‘* * * with the purpose of promoting the highest level of water use efficiency reasonably achievable by project contractors using best available cost-effective technology and best management practices.’’ These Criteria state that all parties (Contractors) that contract with Reclamation for water supplies (municipal and industrial contracts over 2,000 acre-feet and agricultural contracts over 2,000 irrigable acres) must prepare Plans that contain the following information: 1. Description of the District 2. Inventory of Water Resources 3. BMPs for Agricultural Contractors 4. BMPs for Urban Contractors 5. BMP Plan Implementation 6. BMP Exemption Justification Reclamation will evaluate Plans based on these Criteria. A copy of these Plans will be available for review at Reclamation’s Mid-Pacific (MP) Regional Office located in Sacramento, California, and the local area office. Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review. Individual respondents may request that Reclamation withhold their home address from public disclosure, and we will honor such request to the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which Reclamation would elect to withhold a respondent’s identity from public disclosure, as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comments. We will make all submissions from organizations, businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses available for public disclosure in their entirety. If you wish to review a copy of these Plans, please contact Ms. Barbre to find the office nearest you. Dated: May 9, 2005. Donna E. Tegelman, Regional Resources Manager, Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation. [FR Doc. 05–11615 Filed 6–10–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P VerDate jul<14>2003 16:45 Jun 10, 2005 Jkt 205001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 37–TA–541] In the Matter of Certain Power Supply Controllers and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation 34149 Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Goodwin, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 202–205– 2574. U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2003). SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on May 9, 2005 under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Power Integrations, Inc. of San Jose, California. A supplement to the complaint was filed on May 24, 2005. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violation of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain power supply controllers and products containing same by reason of infringement of claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 17–19 of U.S. Patent No. 6,212,079; claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 24, 28, and 29 of U.S. Patent No. 6,351,398; claims 8 and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 6,366,481, and claims 1, 4, 9–11 13, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26, 27, 30, 31, and 34 of U.S. Patent No. 6,538,908. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and after the investigation, issue a permanent limited exclusion order and a permanent cease and desist order. ADDRESSES: The complaint and supplement, except for any confidential information contained therein, are available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing the Internet server at http:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on June 7, 2005, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain power supply controllers and products containing same by reason of infringement of claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 17, 18, or 19 of U.S. Patent No. 6,212,079; claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 24, 28, or 29 of U.S. Patent No. 6,351,398; claims 8 or 12 of U.S. Patent No. 6,366,481; or claims 1, 4, 9–11, 13, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26, 27, 30, 31, or 34 of U.S. Patent No. 6,538,908, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is—Power Integrations, Inc., 5245 Hellyer Avenue, San Jose, California 95138. (b) The respondent is the following company alleged to be in violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is to be served: System General Corporation, 8F, No. 205–3, Sec. 3, Beishin Road, Shindian City, Taipei, Taiwan. (c) Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 401–R, Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. Luckern is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with § 210.13 of the commission’s Rules of Practice and AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM 13JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 112 (Monday, June 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34148-34149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-11615]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Central Valley Project Improvement Act, Water Management Plans

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following Water Management Plans are available for review:
     James Irrigation District
     Lindmore Irrigation District
     City of Lindsay
     Southern San Joaquin Municipal Utility District
     Suisan Solano Water Authority
     Tranquillity Irrigation District
    To meet the requirements of the Central Valley Project Improvement 
Act of 1992 (CVPIA) and the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982, the Bureau 
of Reclamation (Reclamation) has developed and published the Criteria 
for Evaluating Water Management Plans (Criteria).


    Note: For the purpose of this announcement, Water Management 
Plans (Plans) are considered the same as Water Conservation Plans. 
The above districts have developed Plans, which Reclamation has 
evaluated and preliminarily determined to meet the requirements of 
these Criteria. Reclamation is publishing this notice in order to 
allow the public to review the Plans and comment on the preliminary 
determinations. Public comment on Reclamation's preliminary (i.e., 
draft) determination is invited at this time.



DATES: All public comments must be received by July 13, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Please mail comments to Leslie Barbre, Bureau of 
Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, California 95825, or contact 
at 916-978-5232 (TDD 978-5608), or e-mail at lbarbre@mp.usbr.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To be placed on a mailing list for any 
subsequent information, please contact Ms. Barbre at the e-mail address 
or telephone number above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are inviting the public to comment on our 
preliminary (i.e., draft) determination of Plan adequacy. Section 
3405(e) of the CVPIA (Title 34 Pub. L. 102-575) requires the Secretary 
of the Interior to establish and administer an office on Central Valley 
Project water conservation best management practices (BMPs) that shall 
* * * develop criteria for evaluating the adequacy of all water 
conservation plans developed by project contractors, including those 
plans required by Section 210 of the

[[Page 34149]]

Reclamation Reform Act of 1982.'' Also, according to Section 
3405(e)(1), these Criteria must be developed ``* * * with the purpose 
of promoting the highest level of water use efficiency reasonably 
achievable by project contractors using best available cost-effective 
technology and best management practices.'' These Criteria state that 
all parties (Contractors) that contract with Reclamation for water 
supplies (municipal and industrial contracts over 2,000 acre-feet and 
agricultural contracts over 2,000 irrigable acres) must prepare Plans 
that contain the following information:
1. Description of the District
2. Inventory of Water Resources
3. BMPs for Agricultural Contractors
4. BMPs for Urban Contractors
5. BMP Plan Implementation
6. BMP Exemption Justification

    Reclamation will evaluate Plans based on these Criteria. A copy of 
these Plans will be available for review at Reclamation's Mid-Pacific 
(MP) Regional Office located in Sacramento, California, and the local 
area office.
    Our practice is to make comments, including names and home 
addresses of respondents, available for public review. Individual 
respondents may request that Reclamation withhold their home address 
from public disclosure, and we will honor such request to the extent 
allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which Reclamation 
would elect to withhold a respondent's identity from public disclosure, 
as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or 
address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your 
comments. We will make all submissions from organizations, businesses, 
and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or 
officials of organizations or businesses available for public 
disclosure in their entirety. If you wish to review a copy of these 
Plans, please contact Ms. Barbre to find the office nearest you.

    Dated: May 9, 2005.
Donna E. Tegelman,
Regional Resources Manager, Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. 05-11615 Filed 6-10-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P