Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Kennebec River, ME, 33834-33836 [05-11486]
Download as PDF
33834
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 111 / Friday, June 10, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This final rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:23 Jun 09, 2005
Jkt 205001
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this final rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. It has been determined
that this final rule does not significantly
impact the environment.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
December 24 through Monday,
December 26, 2005.
(3) Two-leaf, full bridge openings,
shall be provided at any time, except as
provided in (c)(1), after at least a threeday advance notice is given by calling
the number posted at the bridge.
Dated: May 25, 2005.
David P. Pekoske,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–11487 Filed 6–9–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01–05–034]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations:
Kennebec River, ME
Regulations
For the reasons set out in the preamble, AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 117
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
as follows:
I
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106
Stat. 5039.
2. From June 18, 2005 through
December 30, 2005, paragraph (a) in
§ 117.207 is suspended and a new
paragraph (c) is added to read as
follows:
§ 117.207
Housatonic River.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) From June 18, 2005 through
December 30, 2005, the U.S. 1 Bridge,
mile 3.5, at Stratford, shall open on
signal, except that, it may open only one
of the two-bascule leafs for the passage
of vessel traffic.
(1) From 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to 5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday,
the bridge may remain closed for the
passage of vessel traffic.
(2) Two-leaf, full bridge openings,
shall be provided on holidays as
follows: the Fourth of July, Friday, July
1 through Monday, July 4; Labor Day,
Friday, September 2 through Monday,
September 5; Thanksgiving, Thursday,
November 24 through Sunday,
November 27; and Christmas, Saturday,
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has
temporarily changed the drawbridge
operating regulations governing the
operation of the Carlton Bridge, mile
14.0, across the Kennebec River between
Bath and Woolwich, Maine. This
temporary final rule allows the bridge to
open on signal every three hours at 6
a.m., 9 a.m., 12 p.m., 3 p.m., and 6 p.m.,
Monday through Saturday, from July 5
through December 17, 2005, and again
from April 1 through June 30, 2006, to
facilitate rehabilitation construction at
the bridge. This rule also allows five
three-day bridge closures in September
and October of 2005. Vessels that can
pass under the bridge without a bridge
opening may do so at all times.
DATES: This rule is effective on July 11,
2005 through June 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket (CGD01–05–034) and are
available for inspection or copying at
the First Coast Guard District, Bridge
Branch Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue,
Boston, Massachusetts, 02110, between
7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First
Coast Guard District, (212) 668–7165.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 111 / Friday, June 10, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Information
On April 20, 2005, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Drawbridge Operation
Regulations, Kennebec River, Maine, in
the Federal Register (70 FR 20490). We
received no comments in response to
the notice of proposed rulemaking. No
public hearing was requested and none
was held.
Background and Purpose
The Carlton Bridge has a vertical
clearance of 10 feet at mean high water
and 16 feet at mean low water in the
closed position. The existing
drawbridge operation regulations are
listed at 33 CFR 117.525.
The owner of the bridge, Maine
Department of Transportation (MDOT),
requested a temporary change to the
drawbridge operation regulations to
allow the bridge to open on signal every
three hours at 6 a.m., 9 a.m., 12 p.m.,
3 p.m., and 6 p.m., only, Monday
through Saturday, from July 5 through
December 17, 2005, and again from
April 1 through June 30, 2006, to
facilitate rehabilitation construction at
the bridge.
From 6 p.m. through 6 a.m. the draw
shall open on signal after at least a twohour notice is given by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
The bridge shall open on signal for
Labor Day weekend, Friday, September
2, 2005 through Monday, September 5,
2005, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., and from
5 p.m. through 8 a.m., the draw shall
open after a two-hour notice is given by
calling the number posted at the bridge.
From December 18, 2005 through
March 31, 2006, the bridge shall operate
in accordance with its normal winter
schedule.
In addition, this temporary final rule
allows five three-day bridge closures as
follows: September 7 through
September 9; September 20 through
September 22; October 4 through
October 6; October 18 through October
20; and November 1 through November
3, 2005.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no
comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking. We have changed
the start date of the rule, from July 5,
2005, to July 11, 2005, to ensure that a
full 30 days notice is provided to the
public after publication of this rule.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:23 Jun 09, 2005
Jkt 205001
and benefits under section 6(a)(3), of
that Order. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
that Order. It is not ?significant? under
the regulatory policies and procedures
of the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
This conclusion is based on the fact
that the bridge will continue to open on
signal for all vessels at three-hour
intervals from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b), that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This conclusion is based on the fact
that the bridge will continue to open on
signal for all vessel traffic at three-hour
intervals from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process.
No small entities requested Coast
Guard assistance and none was given.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency?s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33835
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This final rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
33836
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 111 / Friday, June 10, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this final rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. It has been determined
that this final rule does not significantly
impact the environment.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106
Stat. 5039.
2. From July 5, 2005 through June 30,
2006, § 117.525(a) is suspended and a
new paragraph (c) is added to read as
follows:
I
§ 117.525
Kennebecc River.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) (1) The Carlton Bridge, mile 14.0,
shall open on signal at 6 a.m., 9 a.m.,
12 p.m., 3 p.m., and 6 p.m., Monday
through Saturday, from July 5, 2005
through December 17, 2005, and from
April 1, 2006 through June 30, 2006.
From 6 p.m. through 6 a.m. the draw
shall open on signal after at least a twohour notice is given by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
(2) The draw shall open on signal on
Labor Day weekend, Friday, September
2, 2005 through Monday, September 5,
2005, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., and from
5 p.m. through 8 a.m., the draw shall
open after a two-hour notice is given by
calling the number posted at the bridge.
(3) From December 18, 2005 through
March 31, 2006, the bridge shall open
on signal, except that, from 5 p.m. to 8
a.m., the draw would open on signal
after a twenty-four hour notice is given
and from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., on Saturday
and Sunday, after an eight-hour notice
is given by calling the number posted at
the bridge.
(4) The draw of the Carlton Bridge
may remain in the closed position for
five three-day closure periods as
follows: September 7 through
September 9; September 20 through
September 22; October 4 through
October 6; October 18 through October
20; and November 1 through November
3, 2005.
Dated: May 25, 2005.
David P. Pekoske,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–11486 Filed 6–9–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
POSTAL SERVICE
Bridges.
39 CFR Part 111
Regulations
Premium Forwarding Service
For the reasons set out in the preamble,
the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 117 AGENCY: Postal Service.
as follows:
ACTION: Final rule.
I
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:23 Jun 09, 2005
Jkt 205001
SUMMARY: This final rule sets forth the
standards adopted by the Postal
ServiceTM to implement the Premium
Forwarding Service (PFS) experiment.
The Postal Service is conducting the
PFS experiment to measure interest in a
new service that forwards mail to
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
residential customers who are
temporarily away from their primary
address. With PFS, your local Post
Office will ship mail to your temporary
address once a week via Priority Mail.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective at 12:01 a.m. on August 7,
2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick
Klutts, 202–268–7268.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Today,
customers can submit a temporary
forwarding request for their First-Class
Mail and Periodicals mail. Customers
also can have their mail held at the Post
Office for short periods of time.
Premium Forwarding Service (PFS) is a
two-year, nationwide experiment that
reships all of a customer’s mail on a
weekly basis.
PFS is a personalized service
designed for sending mail from a
customer’s primary residential address
to a temporary address using Priority
Mail. With PFS, the Postal Service boxes
and ships mail to customers who are
away for at least two weeks and up to
one year.
Express Mail and Priority Mail
packages that are too large to fit inside
the weekly PFS package are
immediately and separately rerouted at
no additional charge. Package Services
parcels that are too large to fit inside the
PFS package are forwarded with postage
due. All mail requiring a delivery scan
or a signature also is separately
rerouted. Examples include Certified
Mail, Registered Mail, and mail with
Delivery Confirmation.
PFS generally provides a shipment of
a customer’s mail every Wednesday
from their primary address to their
temporary address by Priority Mail.
There is an initial enrollment fee of $10,
plus a weekly per-shipment charge of
$10.
Customers who wish to participate
must submit an application to the Post
Office responsible for delivery to their
primary address and pay the enrollment
fee and shipment charges for the full
duration they will be away. The
minimum enrollment is two weeks, and
the maximum is one year.
Customers who wish to cancel PFS
early may request a refund for any
unused weekly shipment charges from
the Post Office serving their primary
address. Additionally, customers can
contact that Post Office prior to the
termination date to extend PFS service
(up to one year total) as needed.
The Board of Governors of the United
States Postal Service approved the PFS
experiment on May 10, 2005. The
standards, which will be incorporated
into Mailing Standards of the United
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 111 (Friday, June 10, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33834-33836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-11486]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01-05-034]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Kennebec River, ME
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has temporarily changed the drawbridge
operating regulations governing the operation of the Carlton Bridge,
mile 14.0, across the Kennebec River between Bath and Woolwich, Maine.
This temporary final rule allows the bridge to open on signal every
three hours at 6 a.m., 9 a.m., 12 p.m., 3 p.m., and 6 p.m., Monday
through Saturday, from July 5 through December 17, 2005, and again from
April 1 through June 30, 2006, to facilitate rehabilitation
construction at the bridge. This rule also allows five three-day bridge
closures in September and October of 2005. Vessels that can pass under
the bridge without a bridge opening may do so at all times.
DATES: This rule is effective on July 11, 2005 through June 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket (CGD01-05-034) and are available for inspection or
copying at the First Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch Office, 408
Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts, 02110, between 7 a.m. and 3
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer,
First Coast Guard District, (212) 668-7165.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 33835]]
Regulatory Information
On April 20, 2005, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation Regulations, Kennebec River,
Maine, in the Federal Register (70 FR 20490). We received no comments
in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking. No public hearing was
requested and none was held.
Background and Purpose
The Carlton Bridge has a vertical clearance of 10 feet at mean high
water and 16 feet at mean low water in the closed position. The
existing drawbridge operation regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.525.
The owner of the bridge, Maine Department of Transportation (MDOT),
requested a temporary change to the drawbridge operation regulations to
allow the bridge to open on signal every three hours at 6 a.m., 9 a.m.,
12 p.m., 3 p.m., and 6 p.m., only, Monday through Saturday, from July 5
through December 17, 2005, and again from April 1 through June 30,
2006, to facilitate rehabilitation construction at the bridge.
From 6 p.m. through 6 a.m. the draw shall open on signal after at
least a two-hour notice is given by calling the number posted at the
bridge.
The bridge shall open on signal for Labor Day weekend, Friday,
September 2, 2005 through Monday, September 5, 2005, from 8 a.m. to 5
p.m., and from 5 p.m. through 8 a.m., the draw shall open after a two-
hour notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
From December 18, 2005 through March 31, 2006, the bridge shall
operate in accordance with its normal winter schedule.
In addition, this temporary final rule allows five three-day bridge
closures as follows: September 7 through September 9; September 20
through September 22; October 4 through October 6; October 18 through
October 20; and November 1 through November 3, 2005.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking. We have changed the start date of the rule, from
July 5, 2005, to July 11, 2005, to ensure that a full 30 days notice is
provided to the public after publication of this rule.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3), of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ?significant? under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will continue
to open on signal for all vessels at three-hour intervals from 6 a.m.
to 6 p.m.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will continue
to open on signal for all vessel traffic at three-hour intervals from 6
a.m. to 6 p.m.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
No small entities requested Coast Guard assistance and none was
given.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency?s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one
year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This final rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have substantial direct effect on one
or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
[[Page 33836]]
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this final rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. It has been determined that this final
rule does not significantly impact the environment.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulations
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR
part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.
0
2. From July 5, 2005 through June 30, 2006, Sec. 117.525(a) is
suspended and a new paragraph (c) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 117.525 Kennebecc River.
* * * * *
(c) (1) The Carlton Bridge, mile 14.0, shall open on signal at 6
a.m., 9 a.m., 12 p.m., 3 p.m., and 6 p.m., Monday through Saturday,
from July 5, 2005 through December 17, 2005, and from April 1, 2006
through June 30, 2006. From 6 p.m. through 6 a.m. the draw shall open
on signal after at least a two-hour notice is given by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
(2) The draw shall open on signal on Labor Day weekend, Friday,
September 2, 2005 through Monday, September 5, 2005, from 8 a.m. to 5
p.m., and from 5 p.m. through 8 a.m., the draw shall open after a two-
hour notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
(3) From December 18, 2005 through March 31, 2006, the bridge shall
open on signal, except that, from 5 p.m. to 8 a.m., the draw would open
on signal after a twenty-four hour notice is given and from 8 a.m. to 5
p.m., on Saturday and Sunday, after an eight-hour notice is given by
calling the number posted at the bridge.
(4) The draw of the Carlton Bridge may remain in the closed
position for five three-day closure periods as follows: September 7
through September 9; September 20 through September 22; October 4
through October 6; October 18 through October 20; and November 1
through November 3, 2005.
Dated: May 25, 2005.
David P. Pekoske,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05-11486 Filed 6-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P