Federal Acquisition Regulation; Small Entity Compliance Guide, 33676-33677 [05-11183]
Download as PDF
33676
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(2) When the application of (b)(1) of
this subsection results in a loss—
(i) The allowable portion of the loss
is zero if the fair market value exceeds
the undepreciated balance of the asset
on the date the contractor becomes a
lessee; and
(ii) The allowable portion of the loss
is limited to the difference between the
fair market value and the undepreciated
balance of the asset on the date the
contractor becomes a lessee if the fair
market value is less than the
undepreciated balance of the asset on
the date the contractor becomes a lessee.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The gain recognized for contract
costing purposes shall be limited to the
difference between the acquisition cost
(or for assets acquired under a capital
lease, the value at which the leased
asset is capitalized) of the asset and its
undepreciated balance (except see
paragraphs (e)(2)(i) or (ii) of this
subsection).
(e)* * *
(2)* * *
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Recognize the gain or loss in the
period of disposition, in which case the
Government shall participate to the
same extent as outlined in paragraph
(e)(1) of this subsection.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Amend section 31.205–36 by
revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as
follows:
I
31.205–36
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION:
Small Entity Compliance Guide.
Rental costs.
*
*
*
*
*
(b)* * *
(2) Rental costs under a sale and
leaseback arrangement only up to the
amount the contractor would be allowed
if the contractor retained title, computed
based on the net book value of the asset
on the date the contractor becomes a
lessee of the property adjusted for any
gain or loss recognized in accordance
with 31.205–16(b).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 05–11184 Filed 6–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Chapter 1
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Small
Entity Compliance Guide
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
SUMMARY: This document is issued
under the joint authority of the
Secretary of Defense, the Administrator
of General Services and the
Administrator for the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration.
This Small Entity Compliance Guide has
been prepared in accordance with
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996. It consists of a summary of rules
appearing in Federal Acquisition
Circular (FAC) 2005–04 which amend
the FAR. An asterisk (*) next to a rule
indicates that a regulatory flexibility
analysis has been prepared. Interested
parties may obtain further information
regarding these rules by referring to FAC
2005–04 which precedes this document.
These documents are also available via
the Internet at https://www.acqnet.gov/
far.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurieann Duarte, FAR Secretariat, (202)
501–4755. For clarification of content,
contact the analyst whose name appears
in the table below.
LIST OF RULES IN FAC 2005–04
Item
Subject
I ............
II ...........
*III .........
IV ..........
Notification of Employee Rights Concerning Payment of Union Dues or Fees .................................
Telecommuting for Federal Contractors ..............................................................................................
Incentives for Use of Performance-Based Contracting for Services ..................................................
Submission of Cost or Pricing Data on Noncommercial Modifications of Commercial Items (Interim).
Applicability of SDB and HUBZone Price Evaluation Factor ..............................................................
Labor Standards for Contracts Involving Construction .......................................................................
Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions .....................................
Gains and Losses ................................................................................................................................
*V .........
VI ..........
VII .........
VIII ........
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Summaries for each FAR rule follow.
For the actual revisions and/or
amendments to these FAR cases, refer to
the specific item number and subject set
forth in the documents following these
item summaries.
FAC 2005–04 amends the FAR as
specified below:
Item I—Notification of Employee Rights
Concerning Payment of Union Dues or
Fees (FAR Case 2004–010)
This final rule adopts, without
change, the interim rule published in
the Federal Register at 69 FR 76352,
December 20, 2004, and issued as Item
IV of FAC 2001–26. It amends FAR parts
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:35 Jun 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
FAR case
2, 22, and 52 to implement Executive
Order (E.O.) 13201, Notification of
Employee Rights Concerning Payment
of Union Dues or Fees, and Department
of Labor regulations at 29 CFR 470. The
rule requires Government contractors
and subcontractors to post notices
informing their employees that under
Federal law they cannot be required to
join a union or maintain membership in
a union to retain their jobs. The required
notice also advises employees who are
not union members that they can object
to the use of their union dues for certain
purposes. This rule applies to Federal
contractors and subcontractors with
contracts or subcontracts that exceed the
simplified acquisition threshold, unless
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Analyst
2004–010
2003–025
2004–004
2004–035
Marshall.
Zaffos.
Wise.
Olson.
2003–015
2002–004
2001–031
2004–005
Marshall.
Nelson.
Olson.
Olson.
covered by an exemption granted by the
Secretary of Labor.
Item II—Telecommuting for Federal
Contractors (FAR Case 2003–025)
This rule finalizes without changes
the interim rule published in the
Federal Register at 69 FR 59701,
October 5, 2004, and issued as Item III
of FAC 2001–025. This final rule
implements Section 1428 of the Services
Acquisition Reform Act of 2003 (Title
XIV of Public Law 108–136), which
prohibits agencies from including a
requirement in a solicitation that
precludes an offeror from permitting its
employees to telecommute or, when
telecommuting is not precluded, from
E:\FR\FM\08JNR4.SGM
08JNR4
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
unfavorably evaluating an offeror’s
proposal that includes telecommuting
unless it would adversely affect agency
requirements, such as security.
Contracting officers awarding service
contracts should familiarize themselves
with this rule.
Item III—Incentives for Use of
Performance-Based Contracting for
Services (FAR Case 2004–004)
This final rule amends the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to provide
Governmentwide authority to treat
performance-based contracts or task
orders for services as commercial items,
if certain conditions are met. Agencies
must report on the use of this authority.
This change implements sections 1431
and 1433 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004
(Pub. L. 108–136) and is intended to
promote the use of performance-based
contracting.
Item IV—Submission of Cost or Pricing
Data on Noncommercial Modifications
of Commercial Items (FAR Case 2004–
035)
This interim rule implements an
amendment to 10 U.S.C. 2306a. The
change requires that the exception from
the requirement to obtain certified cost
or pricing data for a commercial item
does not apply to noncommercial
modifications of a commercial item that
are expected to cost, in the aggregate,
more than $500,000 or 5 percent of the
total price of the contract, whichever is
greater. Section 818 applies to offers
submitted, and to modifications of
contracts or subcontracts made, on or
after June 1, 2005. This new policy
applies only to acquisitions funded by
DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard, since
the statute amends 10 U.S.C. 2306a,
which only applies to DoD, NASA, and
the Coast Guard. The new language does
not apply to acquisitions funded by
other than DoD, NASA, or the Coast
Guard because Section 818 did not
amend 41 U.S.C. 254b, which prohibits
obtaining cost or pricing data for
commercial items. However, the new
policy applies to contracts awarded or
task or delivery orders placed on behalf
of DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard by
an official of the United States outside
of those agencies, because the statutory
requirement of Section 818 applies to
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:35 Jun 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
the funds provided by DoD, NASA, or
the Coast Guard.
Item V—Applicability of SDB and
HUBZone Price Evaluation Factor (FAR
Case 2003–015)
This final rule removes some of the
exceptions to the Small Disadvantaged
Business and HUBZone preference
programs. The contracting officer will
now apply a price evaluation
adjustment to offers of eligible products
in acquisitions subject to the Trade
Agreements Act. This rule will have a
beneficial impact on all domestic
concerns, especially small entities that
are small disadvantaged business
concerns or HUBZone small business
concerns.
Item VI—Labor Standards for Contracts
Involving Construction (FAR Case
2002–004)
This final rule implements in the FAR
the DoL rule revising the terms
‘‘construction, prosecution, completion
or repair’’ (29 CFR 5.2(j)) and ‘‘site of
the work’’ (29 CFR 5.2(l)). In addition,
the Councils have clarified several
definitions relating to labor standards
for contracts involving construction and
made requirements for flow down of
labor clauses more precise.
The most significant impact of this
rule is that contractors must pay DavisBacon Act wages at a secondary site of
the work, if a significant portion of the
work is to be constructed at that site and
the site meets the other criteria specified
in the rule. When transporting portions
of the building or work between the
secondary site of the work and the
primary site of the work, the wages for
the primary site of the work are
applicable. The contracting officer must
coordinate with the Department of
Labor when there is any uncertainty as
to whether a work site is a secondary
site of the work.
Item VII—Deferred Compensation and
Postretirement Benefits Other Than
Pensions (FAR Case 2001–031)
This final rule amends the FAR by
revising paragraph (k), Deferred
compensation other than pensions, and
paragraph (o), Postretirement benefits
other than pensions, of FAR 31.205–6,
Compensation for personal services,
cost principle. Changes to paragraph (k)
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
33677
include: deletion of language that
duplicates definitions provided in FAR
31.001, elimination of obsolete
coverage, and use of terminology
consistent with Cost Accounting
Standards. Changes to paragraph (o)
include: moving and revising language
in (o)(3) through (o)(5) to (o)(2)(iii)
because these requirements only apply
to accrual costing other than terminal
funding. In addition, new coverage is
added to the related contract clause at
FAR 52.215–18, Reversion or
Adjustment of Plans for Postretirement
Benefits (PRB) Other Than Pensions,
specifying the method of recovery of
refunds and credits. The rule revises the
cost principle and contract clause by
improving clarity and structure, and
removing unnecessary and duplicative
language.
The case was initiated as a result of
comments and recommendations
received from industry and Government
representatives during a series of public
meetings. This rule is of particular
interest to contractors and contracting
officers who use cost analysis to price
contracts and modifications, and who
determine or negotiate reasonable costs
in accordance with a clause of a
contract, e.g., price revision of fixedprice incentive contracts, terminated
contracts, or indirect cost rates.
Item VIII—Gains and Losses (FAR Case
2004–005)
This final rule amends FAR 31.205–
16 to address the timing of the gain or
loss recognition of sale and leaseback
arrangements of contractor depreciable
property or other capital assets. The
final rule defines the disposition date
for a sale leaseback arrangement as the
date the contractor begins to incur an
obligation for lease or rental costs.
Contracting officers, auditors, and
contractors with responsibilities related
to allowable cost determinations
involving sale and leaseback
arrangements of contractor depreciable
property or other capital assets will be
impacted by new policies governing that
area.
Dated: May 27, 2005.
Julia B. Wise,
Director, Contract Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 05–11183 Filed 6–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S
E:\FR\FM\08JNR4.SGM
08JNR4
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 8, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33676-33677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-11183]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Chapter 1
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Small Entity Compliance Guide
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Small Entity Compliance Guide.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document is issued under the joint authority of the
Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of General Services and the
Administrator for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
This Small Entity Compliance Guide has been prepared in accordance with
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
of 1996. It consists of a summary of rules appearing in Federal
Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-04 which amend the FAR. An asterisk (*)
next to a rule indicates that a regulatory flexibility analysis has
been prepared. Interested parties may obtain further information
regarding these rules by referring to FAC 2005-04 which precedes this
document. These documents are also available via the Internet at http:/
/www.acqnet.gov/far.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurieann Duarte, FAR Secretariat,
(202) 501-4755. For clarification of content, contact the analyst whose
name appears in the table below.
List of Rules in FAC 2005-04
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item Subject FAR case Analyst
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I.............. Notification of Employee Rights Concerning 2004-010 Marshall.
Payment of Union Dues or Fees.
II............. Telecommuting for Federal Contractors........ 2003-025 Zaffos.
*III........... Incentives for Use of Performance-Based 2004-004 Wise.
Contracting for Services.
IV............. Submission of Cost or Pricing Data on 2004-035 Olson.
Noncommercial Modifications of Commercial
Items (Interim).
*V............. Applicability of SDB and HUBZone Price 2003-015 Marshall.
Evaluation Factor.
VI............. Labor Standards for Contracts Involving 2002-004 Nelson.
Construction.
VII............ Deferred Compensation and Postretirement 2001-031 Olson.
Benefits Other Than Pensions.
VIII........... Gains and Losses............................. 2004-005 Olson.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Summaries for each FAR rule follow. For the
actual revisions and/or amendments to these FAR cases, refer to the
specific item number and subject set forth in the documents following
these item summaries.
FAC 2005-04 amends the FAR as specified below:
Item I--Notification of Employee Rights Concerning Payment of Union
Dues or Fees (FAR Case 2004-010)
This final rule adopts, without change, the interim rule published
in the Federal Register at 69 FR 76352, December 20, 2004, and issued
as Item IV of FAC 2001-26. It amends FAR parts 2, 22, and 52 to
implement Executive Order (E.O.) 13201, Notification of Employee Rights
Concerning Payment of Union Dues or Fees, and Department of Labor
regulations at 29 CFR 470. The rule requires Government contractors and
subcontractors to post notices informing their employees that under
Federal law they cannot be required to join a union or maintain
membership in a union to retain their jobs. The required notice also
advises employees who are not union members that they can object to the
use of their union dues for certain purposes. This rule applies to
Federal contractors and subcontractors with contracts or subcontracts
that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, unless covered by an
exemption granted by the Secretary of Labor.
Item II--Telecommuting for Federal Contractors (FAR Case 2003-025)
This rule finalizes without changes the interim rule published in
the Federal Register at 69 FR 59701, October 5, 2004, and issued as
Item III of FAC 2001-025. This final rule implements Section 1428 of
the Services Acquisition Reform Act of 2003 (Title XIV of Public Law
108-136), which prohibits agencies from including a requirement in a
solicitation that precludes an offeror from permitting its employees to
telecommute or, when telecommuting is not precluded, from
[[Page 33677]]
unfavorably evaluating an offeror's proposal that includes
telecommuting unless it would adversely affect agency requirements,
such as security. Contracting officers awarding service contracts
should familiarize themselves with this rule.
Item III--Incentives for Use of Performance-Based Contracting for
Services (FAR Case 2004-004)
This final rule amends the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
provide Governmentwide authority to treat performance-based contracts
or task orders for services as commercial items, if certain conditions
are met. Agencies must report on the use of this authority. This change
implements sections 1431 and 1433 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Pub. L. 108-136) and is intended to promote
the use of performance-based contracting.
Item IV--Submission of Cost or Pricing Data on Noncommercial
Modifications of Commercial Items (FAR Case 2004-035)
This interim rule implements an amendment to 10 U.S.C. 2306a. The
change requires that the exception from the requirement to obtain
certified cost or pricing data for a commercial item does not apply to
noncommercial modifications of a commercial item that are expected to
cost, in the aggregate, more than $500,000 or 5 percent of the total
price of the contract, whichever is greater. Section 818 applies to
offers submitted, and to modifications of contracts or subcontracts
made, on or after June 1, 2005. This new policy applies only to
acquisitions funded by DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard, since the statute
amends 10 U.S.C. 2306a, which only applies to DoD, NASA, and the Coast
Guard. The new language does not apply to acquisitions funded by other
than DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard because Section 818 did not amend 41
U.S.C. 254b, which prohibits obtaining cost or pricing data for
commercial items. However, the new policy applies to contracts awarded
or task or delivery orders placed on behalf of DoD, NASA, or the Coast
Guard by an official of the United States outside of those agencies,
because the statutory requirement of Section 818 applies to the funds
provided by DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard.
Item V--Applicability of SDB and HUBZone Price Evaluation Factor (FAR
Case 2003-015)
This final rule removes some of the exceptions to the Small
Disadvantaged Business and HUBZone preference programs. The contracting
officer will now apply a price evaluation adjustment to offers of
eligible products in acquisitions subject to the Trade Agreements Act.
This rule will have a beneficial impact on all domestic concerns,
especially small entities that are small disadvantaged business
concerns or HUBZone small business concerns.
Item VI--Labor Standards for Contracts Involving Construction (FAR Case
2002-004)
This final rule implements in the FAR the DoL rule revising the
terms ``construction, prosecution, completion or repair'' (29 CFR
5.2(j)) and ``site of the work'' (29 CFR 5.2(l)). In addition, the
Councils have clarified several definitions relating to labor standards
for contracts involving construction and made requirements for flow
down of labor clauses more precise.
The most significant impact of this rule is that contractors must
pay Davis-Bacon Act wages at a secondary site of the work, if a
significant portion of the work is to be constructed at that site and
the site meets the other criteria specified in the rule. When
transporting portions of the building or work between the secondary
site of the work and the primary site of the work, the wages for the
primary site of the work are applicable. The contracting officer must
coordinate with the Department of Labor when there is any uncertainty
as to whether a work site is a secondary site of the work.
Item VII--Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefits Other Than
Pensions (FAR Case 2001-031)
This final rule amends the FAR by revising paragraph (k), Deferred
compensation other than pensions, and paragraph (o), Postretirement
benefits other than pensions, of FAR 31.205-6, Compensation for
personal services, cost principle. Changes to paragraph (k) include:
deletion of language that duplicates definitions provided in FAR
31.001, elimination of obsolete coverage, and use of terminology
consistent with Cost Accounting Standards. Changes to paragraph (o)
include: moving and revising language in (o)(3) through (o)(5) to
(o)(2)(iii) because these requirements only apply to accrual costing
other than terminal funding. In addition, new coverage is added to the
related contract clause at FAR 52.215-18, Reversion or Adjustment of
Plans for Postretirement Benefits (PRB) Other Than Pensions, specifying
the method of recovery of refunds and credits. The rule revises the
cost principle and contract clause by improving clarity and structure,
and removing unnecessary and duplicative language.
The case was initiated as a result of comments and recommendations
received from industry and Government representatives during a series
of public meetings. This rule is of particular interest to contractors
and contracting officers who use cost analysis to price contracts and
modifications, and who determine or negotiate reasonable costs in
accordance with a clause of a contract, e.g., price revision of fixed-
price incentive contracts, terminated contracts, or indirect cost
rates.
Item VIII--Gains and Losses (FAR Case 2004-005)
This final rule amends FAR 31.205-16 to address the timing of the
gain or loss recognition of sale and leaseback arrangements of
contractor depreciable property or other capital assets. The final rule
defines the disposition date for a sale leaseback arrangement as the
date the contractor begins to incur an obligation for lease or rental
costs. Contracting officers, auditors, and contractors with
responsibilities related to allowable cost determinations involving
sale and leaseback arrangements of contractor depreciable property or
other capital assets will be impacted by new policies governing that
area.
Dated: May 27, 2005.
Julia B. Wise,
Director, Contract Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 05-11183 Filed 6-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S