Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Requests for Inspection by an Accredited Person Under the Inspection by Accredited Persons Program, 33179-33180 [05-11264]
Download as PDF
33179
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 7, 2005 / Notices
provisions. One comment was received
but was not related to the information
collection.
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
Reporting Activity
Number of Respondents
Annual Frequency per
Response
Total Annual Responses
Hours per
Respondent
Total Hours
Designation Request
56
1.20
67
60
4,020
Premeeting Packages
47
1.00
47
100
4,700
Total
8,720
1There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Dated: May 31, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–11206 Filed 6–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2004D–0251]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Requests for
Inspection by an Accredited Person
Under the Inspection by Accredited
Persons Program
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by July 7,
2005.
The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) is still experiencing
significant delays in the regular mail,
including first class and express mail,
and messenger deliveries are not being
accepted. To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that comments be
faxed to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: Fumie
Yokota, Desk Officer for FDA, FAX:
202–395–6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peggy Robbins, Office of Management
Programs (HFA–250), Food and Drug
ADDRESSES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:54 Jun 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–1223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Requests for Inspection by an
Accredited Person under the Inspection
by Accredited Persons Program
Section 201 of the Medical Device
User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002
(MDUFMA) (Public Law 107–250)
amends section 704 of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21
U.S.C. 374) by adding paragraph (g).
This amendment authorizes FDA to
establish a voluntary third party
inspection program applicable to
manufacturers of class II or class III
medical devices who meet certain
eligibility criteria. Under this new
Inspection by Accredited Persons
Program (AP program), such
manufacturers may elect to have third
parties that have been accredited by
FDA (accredited person or AP) conduct
some of their inspections instead of
FDA.
The AP program applies to
manufacturers who currently market
their medical devices in the United
States and who also market or plan to
market their devices in foreign
countries. Such manufacturers may
need current inspections of their
establishments to operate in global
commerce.
The applicant must submit the
following information in support of a
request for approval to use an AP:
• Information that shows that the
applicant ‘‘manufactures, prepares,
propagates, compounds, or processes’’
class II or class III medical devices.
• Information that shows that the
applicant markets at least one of the
devices in the United States.
• Information that shows that the
applicant markets or intends to market
at least one of the devices in one or
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
more foreign countries and one or both
of the following two conditions are met
as follows:
1. One of the foreign countries
certifies, accredits, or otherwise
recognizes the AP the applicant has
selected as a person authorized to
conduct inspections of device
establishments; or
2. A statement that the law of a
country where the applicant markets or
intends to market the device recognizes
an inspection by the FDA or by the AP.
• Information that shows that the
applicant’s most recent inspection
performed by FDA, or by an AP under
this program, was classified by FDA as
either ‘‘No Action Indicated (NAI)’’ or
‘‘Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI);’’
and
• A notice to FDA requesting
clearance (approval) to use an AP, and
identifying the AP the applicant
selected.
In the Federal Register of June 3, 2004
(69 FR 31397 at 31398), FDA published
a 60-day notice requesting public
comment on the information collection
provisions. FDA received one comment
concerning the potential burden
associated with the third party
inspectional program application
process if related cumulative partial
inspections over a 2-year period were
not recognized by FDA as a single
comprehensive inspection. FDA
clarified the guidance to state that
manufacturers may rely on a single
comprehensive inspection or a serious
of partial inspections that would
cumulatively constitute a complete
inspection for the purposes of meeting
FDA’s biennial inspection requirement.
Reapplication to the FDA AP inspection
program will not be necessary to
conduct each related partial inspection
that cumulatively constitutes a single
comprehensive inspection of an
establishment.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
33180
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 7, 2005 / Notices
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
No. of Respondents
Annual Frequency per Response
100
1
1 There
Dated: May 31, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–11264 Filed 6–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2005N–0209]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Food Contact
Substances Notification System
AGENCY:
Hours per Response
100
15
Total Hours
1,500
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
There are approximately 8,000 foreign
and 10,000 domestic manufacturers of
medical devices. Approximately 5,000
of these firms only manufacture class I
devices and are, therefore, not eligible
for the AP program. In addition, 40
percent of the domestic firms do not
export devices and therefore are not
eligible for the AP program. Also 10 to
15 percent of the firms are not eligible
due to the results of their previous
inspection. FDA estimates that there are
4,000 domestic manufacturers and 4,000
foreign manufacturers that are eligible
for inclusion in the AP program. Based
on informal communications with
industry, FDA estimates that
approximately 100 of these
manufacturers may apply to use an AP
in any given year.
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Total Annual Responses
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
the collection of information associated
with the Food Contact Substances
Notification System.
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:54 Jun 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by August 8, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to: https://www.fda.gov/
dockets/ecomments. Submit written
comments on the collection of
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peggy Robbins, Office of Management
Programs (HFA–250), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857,301–827–1223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an
existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, FDA invites
comments on these topics: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of FDA’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Food Contact Substances Notification
System—21 CFR 170.101 and 170.106—
(OMB Control Number 0910–0495)—
Extension
Section 409(h) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21
U.S.C. 348(h)) establishes a premarket
notification process for food contact
substances. Section 409(h)(6) of the act
defines a ‘‘food contact substance’’ as
‘‘any substance intended for use as a
component of materials used in
manufacturing, packing, packaging,
transporting, or holding food if such use
is not intended to have any technical
effect in such food.’’ Section 409(h)(3) of
the act requires that the notification
process be used for authorizing the
marketing of food contact substances
except where FDA determines that the
submission and premarket review of a
food additive petition (FAP) under
section 409(b) of the act is necessary to
provide adequate assurance of safety or
where FDA and the manufacturer or
supplier agree that an FAP should be
submitted. Section 409(h)(1) of the act
requires that a notification include
information on the identity and the
intended use of the food contact
substance and the basis for the
manufacturer’s or supplier’s
determination that the food contact
substance is safe under the intended
conditions of use.
Sections 170.101 and 170.106 of
FDA’s regulations (21 CFR 170.101 and
170.106) require that a food contact
notification (FCN) include FDA Form
3480 entitled ‘‘Notification for New Use
of a Food Contact Substance’’ and that
a notification for a food contact
substance formulation include FDA
Form 3479 entitled ‘‘Notification for a
Food Contact Substance Formulation.’’
These forms will serve to summarize
pertinent information in the
notification. FDA believes that these
forms will facilitate both preparation
and review of notifications because the
forms will serve to organize information
necessary to support the safety of the
use of the food contact substance. The
burden of filling out the appropriate
form has been included in the burden
estimate for the notification.
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33179-33180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-11264]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2004D-0251]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Requests for
Inspection by an Accredited Person Under the Inspection by Accredited
Persons Program
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by July 7,
2005.
ADDRESSES: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is still
experiencing significant delays in the regular mail, including first
class and express mail, and messenger deliveries are not being
accepted. To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: Fumie Yokota, Desk
Officer for FDA, FAX: 202-395-6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Robbins, Office of Management
Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Requests for Inspection by an Accredited Person under the
Inspection by Accredited Persons Program
Section 201 of the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of
2002 (MDUFMA) (Public Law 107-250) amends section 704 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 374) by adding
paragraph (g). This amendment authorizes FDA to establish a voluntary
third party inspection program applicable to manufacturers of class II
or class III medical devices who meet certain eligibility criteria.
Under this new Inspection by Accredited Persons Program (AP program),
such manufacturers may elect to have third parties that have been
accredited by FDA (accredited person or AP) conduct some of their
inspections instead of FDA.
The AP program applies to manufacturers who currently market their
medical devices in the United States and who also market or plan to
market their devices in foreign countries. Such manufacturers may need
current inspections of their establishments to operate in global
commerce.
The applicant must submit the following information in support of a
request for approval to use an AP:
Information that shows that the applicant ``manufactures,
prepares, propagates, compounds, or processes'' class II or class III
medical devices.
Information that shows that the applicant markets at least
one of the devices in the United States.
Information that shows that the applicant markets or
intends to market at least one of the devices in one or more foreign
countries and one or both of the following two conditions are met as
follows:
1. One of the foreign countries certifies, accredits, or otherwise
recognizes the AP the applicant has selected as a person authorized to
conduct inspections of device establishments; or
2. A statement that the law of a country where the applicant
markets or intends to market the device recognizes an inspection by the
FDA or by the AP.
Information that shows that the applicant's most recent
inspection performed by FDA, or by an AP under this program, was
classified by FDA as either ``No Action Indicated (NAI)'' or
``Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI);'' and
A notice to FDA requesting clearance (approval) to use an
AP, and identifying the AP the applicant selected.
In the Federal Register of June 3, 2004 (69 FR 31397 at 31398), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the information
collection provisions. FDA received one comment concerning the
potential burden associated with the third party inspectional program
application process if related cumulative partial inspections over a 2-
year period were not recognized by FDA as a single comprehensive
inspection. FDA clarified the guidance to state that manufacturers may
rely on a single comprehensive inspection or a serious of partial
inspections that would cumulatively constitute a complete inspection
for the purposes of meeting FDA's biennial inspection requirement.
Reapplication to the FDA AP inspection program will not be necessary to
conduct each related partial inspection that cumulatively constitutes a
single comprehensive inspection of an establishment.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
[[Page 33180]]
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of Respondents Annual Frequency per Response Total Annual Responses Hours per Response Total Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
100 1 100 15 1,500
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
There are approximately 8,000 foreign and 10,000 domestic
manufacturers of medical devices. Approximately 5,000 of these firms
only manufacture class I devices and are, therefore, not eligible for
the AP program. In addition, 40 percent of the domestic firms do not
export devices and therefore are not eligible for the AP program. Also
10 to 15 percent of the firms are not eligible due to the results of
their previous inspection. FDA estimates that there are 4,000 domestic
manufacturers and 4,000 foreign manufacturers that are eligible for
inclusion in the AP program. Based on informal communications with
industry, FDA estimates that approximately 100 of these manufacturers
may apply to use an AP in any given year.
Dated: May 31, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-11264 Filed 6-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S