Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8-11, DC-8-12, DC-8-21, DC-8-31, DC-8-32, DC-8-33, DC-8-41, DC-8-42, and DC-8-43 Airplanes; DC-8-50 Series Airplanes; DC-8-61 Airplanes; DC-8-61F Airplanes; DC-8-71 Airplanes; and DC-8-71F Airplanes, 33045 [05-11257]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 7, 2005 / Proposed Rules (b) CCC will collect commodity assessments authorized under a State statute when: (1) The Governor of the State has: (i) Requested that the assessment be collected; (ii) Identified whether the assessment is to be collected at the time the loan proceeds are disbursed or at the time the commodity is forfeited to CCC; and (iii) Identified the person who may enter into an agreement with CCC that sets forth the obligations of the State and CCC with respect to the collection of the assessment; (2) The Attorney General of the State, or a person authorized to act on behalf of the Attorney General, has provided to CCC an opinion that the collection activity is authorized by State law and otherwise complies with the provisions of section 1(a) of Public Law 108–470; (3) The agreement described in paragraph (c) of this section has been executed by the appropriate State official and CCC. (c) CCC will enter into an agreement with an authorized State official to collect commodity assessments when the actions set forth in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section have been completed. Such agreement will contain the obligations and responsibilities of the State and CCC. All such agreements will include provisions that provide: (1) The State will indemnify CCC for any costs incurred in the collection of the assessment including costs incurred with respect to resolution of disputes arising from the requested collection of the assessment; (2) A producer may request from the State a refund of the assessment collected from the producer’s marketing assistance loan; (3) The agreement may be terminated by either party upon 30 days notice. Signed in Washington, DC, on May 25, 2005. James R. Little, Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation. [FR Doc. 05–11199 Filed 6–6–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–05–P VerDate jul<14>2003 16:08 Jun 06, 2005 Jkt 205001 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. 2001–NM–152–AD] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC–8–11, DC–8–12, DC–8–21, DC–8–31, DC–8–32, DC–8– 33, DC–8–41, DC–8–42, and DC–8–43 Airplanes; DC–8–50 Series Airplanes; DC–8–61 Airplanes; DC–8–61F Airplanes; DC–8–71 Airplanes; and DC–8–71F Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This action withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that proposed revision of an existing airworthiness directive (AD). The existing AD applies to certain McDonnell Douglas airplanes. That NPRM would have extended the compliance time for the follow-on inspection after accomplishment of the modification required by the existing AD. Since the issuance of the NPRM, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has approved an alternative method of compliance for the existing AD using a new version of the service bulletin that provides an acceptable level of safety. Accordingly, the proposed rule is withdrawn. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon Mowery, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712–4137; telephone (562) 627–5322; fax (562) 627–5210. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to revise an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas transport category airplanes, was published in the Federal Register as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on January 30, 2003 (68 FR 4727). The NPRM proposed to revise AD 2001–06–02, amendment 39–12149, to extend the compliance time from ‘‘within 32,000 flight hours’’ to ‘‘within 32,000 landings’’ for the follow-on inspection after accomplishment of the terminating modification required by AD 2001–06– 02. That action was prompted by data indicating that extending the compliance time for the follow-on inspection would provide an acceptable level of safety. PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 33045 Actions That Occurred Since the NPRM Was Issued Since the issuance of that NPRM, we have approved McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC8–57–090, Revision 6, dated April 9, 2002, as an alternative method of compliance with AD 2001– 06–02. Revision 6 provides data indicating that extending the compliance time for the follow-on inspection required by AD 2001–06–02 to ‘‘within 32,000 landings’’ provides an acceptable level of safety. FAA’s Conclusions Since we approved Revision 6 as an alternative method of compliance with AD 2001–06–02, we have determined that it is unnecessary to revise AD 2001–06–02 to extend the compliance time of the follow-on inspection to the terminating action. Accordingly, the proposed rule is hereby withdrawn. Withdrawal of this NPRM constitutes only such action, and does not preclude the agency from issuing another action in the future, nor does it commit the agency to any course of action in the future. Regulatory Impact Since this action only withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking, it is neither a proposed nor a final rule and therefore is not covered under Executive Order 12866, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, or DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. The Withdrawal Accordingly, the notice of proposed rulemaking, Docket 2001–NM–152–AD, published in the Federal Register on January 30, 2003 (68 FR 4727), is withdrawn. Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 27, 2005. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 05–11257 Filed 6–6–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P E:\FR\FM\07JNP1.SGM 07JNP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 7, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 33045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-11257]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2001-NM-152-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8-11, DC-8-
12, DC-8-21, DC-8-31, DC-8-32, DC-8-33, DC-8-41, DC-8-42, and DC-8-43 
Airplanes; DC-8-50 Series Airplanes; DC-8-61 Airplanes; DC-8-61F 
Airplanes; DC-8-71 Airplanes; and DC-8-71F Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
that proposed revision of an existing airworthiness directive (AD). The 
existing AD applies to certain McDonnell Douglas airplanes. That NPRM 
would have extended the compliance time for the follow-on inspection 
after accomplishment of the modification required by the existing AD. 
Since the issuance of the NPRM, the Federal Aviation Administration 
(FAA) has approved an alternative method of compliance for the existing 
AD using a new version of the service bulletin that provides an 
acceptable level of safety. Accordingly, the proposed rule is 
withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon Mowery, Aerospace Engineer, 
Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137; 
telephone (562) 627-5322; fax (562) 627-5210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to revise an existing 
airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas 
transport category airplanes, was published in the Federal Register as 
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on January 30, 2003 (68 FR 
4727). The NPRM proposed to revise AD 2001-06-02, amendment 39-12149, 
to extend the compliance time from ``within 32,000 flight hours'' to 
``within 32,000 landings'' for the follow-on inspection after 
accomplishment of the terminating modification required by AD 2001-06-
02. That action was prompted by data indicating that extending the 
compliance time for the follow-on inspection would provide an 
acceptable level of safety.

Actions That Occurred Since the NPRM Was Issued

    Since the issuance of that NPRM, we have approved McDonnell Douglas 
Service Bulletin DC8-57-090, Revision 6, dated April 9, 2002, as an 
alternative method of compliance with AD 2001-06-02. Revision 6 
provides data indicating that extending the compliance time for the 
follow-on inspection required by AD 2001-06-02 to ``within 32,000 
landings'' provides an acceptable level of safety.

FAA's Conclusions

    Since we approved Revision 6 as an alternative method of compliance 
with AD 2001-06-02, we have determined that it is unnecessary to revise 
AD 2001-06-02 to extend the compliance time of the follow-on inspection 
to the terminating action. Accordingly, the proposed rule is hereby 
withdrawn.
    Withdrawal of this NPRM constitutes only such action, and does not 
preclude the agency from issuing another action in the future, nor does 
it commit the agency to any course of action in the future.

Regulatory Impact

    Since this action only withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking, 
it is neither a proposed nor a final rule and therefore is not covered 
under Executive Order 12866, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, or DOT 
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979).

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Withdrawal

    Accordingly, the notice of proposed rulemaking, Docket 2001-NM-152-
AD, published in the Federal Register on January 30, 2003 (68 FR 4727), 
is withdrawn.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 27, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-11257 Filed 6-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.