Proper Disposal of Consumer Information Under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, 32228-32229 [05-10931]
Download as PDF
32228
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 105 / Thursday, June 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
License means a license issued
pursuant to 10 CFR parts 50, 52, 60, 63,
70, or 72.
*
*
*
*
*
Security container includes any of the
following repositories:
*
*
*
*
*
(2) A safe—burglar-resistive cabinet or
chest which bears a label of the
Underwriters’ Laboratories, Inc.,
certifying the unit to be a TL–15, TL–
30, or TRTL–30, and has a body
fabricated of not less than 1 inch of steel
and a door fabricated of not less than
11⁄2 inches of steel exclusive of the
combination lock and bolt work; or
bears a Test Certification Label on the
inside of the door, or is marked
‘‘General Services Administration
Approved Security Container’’ and has
a body of steel at least 1⁄2 inch thick, and
a combination locked steel door at least
1 inch thick, exclusive of bolt work and
locking devices; and an automatic unit
locking mechanism.
*
*
*
*
*
Violation means any knowing, willful,
or negligent action that could
reasonably be expected to result in an
unauthorized disclosure of classified
information or any knowing, willful, or
negligent action to classify or continue
the classification of information
contrary to the requirements of E.O.
12958, as amended, or its implementing
directives.
9. Section 95.59 is revised to read as
follows:
I
§ 95.59
Inspections.
The Commission shall make
inspections and reviews of the premises,
activities, records and procedures of any
person subject to the regulations in this
part as the Commission and CSA deem
necessary to effect the purposes of the
Act, E.O. 12958, as amended, and/or
NRC rules.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day
of May, 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Luis A. Reyes,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 05–10933 Filed 6–1–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Jun 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Thrift Supervision
12 CFR Part 568
[No. 2005–17]
RIN 1550–AB87
Proper Disposal of Consumer
Information Under the Fair and
Accurate Credit Transactions Act of
2003
Office of Thrift Supervision
(OTS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: OTS is making a technical
amendment to its Security Procedures
rule to ensure that an amendment to
that rule published December 28, 2004,
and scheduled to take effect July 1,
2005, does not supersede an amendment
to that rule that was published and took
effect March 29, 2005.
DATES: Effective July 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Bennett, Counsel, Regulations
and Legislation Division, (202) 906–
7409.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
On December 28, 2004, OTS, along
with the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, and Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (the
Agencies), published in the Federal
Register a final rule entitled ‘‘Proper
Disposal of Consumer Information
Under the Fair and Accurate Credit
Transactions Act of 2003’’ (69 FR
77610), implementing section 216 of the
Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions
Act of 2003 (FACT Act). That rule
included conforming amendments to
OTS’s Security Procedures rule in
§ 568.5 of Title 12 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. These conforming
amendments reflected the change to the
title of Appendix B to part 570 of Title
12 from ‘‘Interagency Guidelines
Establishing Standards for Safety and
Soundness’’ to ‘‘Interagency Guidelines
Establishing Standards for Safeguarding
Customer Information’’ (Security
Guidelines) and the expansion of the
legal basis for the Security Guidelines
with the implementation of section 216
of the FACT Act. These changes become
effective on July 1, 2005.
On March 29, 2005, the Agencies
published in the Federal Register (70
FR 15736) interpretive guidance and an
OTS final rule entitled ‘‘Interagency
Guidance on Response Programs for
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Unauthorized Access to Customer
Information and Customer Notice.’’ OTS
codified its interpretive guidance as
Supplement A to its Security Guidelines
in Appendix B to Part 570. The final
rule also made a conforming, technical
change to § 568.5, which added a
sentence at the end of the section to
reference the interpretive guidance in
Supplement A.
On July 1, 2005, the December 28 rule
text for § 568.5 will supersede the
current text that became effective on
March 29; however, the sentence that
was added by the March 29 final rule
will still be applicable and should
remain as part of the rule text for § 568.5
beyond June 30, 2005. Therefore, OTS is
making a further technical amendment
to § 568.5 effective July 1, 2005, to add
the sentence from the March 29 final
rule that goes at the end of § 568.5 so
that it will remain in effect when the
December 28 final rule takes effect on
July 1.
II. Regulatory Analysis
Administrative Procedure Act; Riegle
Community Development and
Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994
OTS finds that there is good cause to
dispense with prior notice and comment
on this final rule and with the 30-day
delay of effective date mandated by the
Administrative Procedure Act.1 OTS
believes that these procedures are
unnecessary and contrary to public
interest because the rule merely makes
a technical change to an existing
regulation. The amendment in the rule
is not substantive and will not affect
savings associations.
Section 302 of the Riegle Community
Development and Regulatory
Improvement Act of 1994 provides that
regulations that impose additional
reporting, disclosure, or other new
requirements may not take effect before
the first day of the quarter following
publication.2 This section does not
apply because this final rule imposes no
additional requirements and makes only
a technical change to an existing
regulation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act,3 the OTS
Acting Director certifies that this
technical amendment will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
15
U.S.C. 553.
L. 103–325, 12 U.S.C. 4802.
3 Pub. L. 96–354, 5 U.S.C. 601.
2 Pub.
E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM
02JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 105 / Thursday, June 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 12866
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OTS has determined that this rule is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Federal Aviation Administration
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
[Docket No. FAA–2004–19667; Airspace
Docket No. 04–ASO–13]
OTS has determined that the
requirements of this final rule will not
result in expenditures by State, local,
and tribal governments, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year. Accordingly, a
budgetary impact statement is not
required under section 202 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 568
Consumer protection, Privacy,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Savings associations,
Security measures.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, OTS amends part 568 of title
12 of chapter V of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
I
PART 568—SECURITY PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 568
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1462a, 1463, 1464,
1467a, 1828, 1831p–1, 1881–1884; 15 U.S.C.
1681s and 1681w; 15 U.S.C. 6801 and
6805(b)(1).
I
§ 568.5 Protection of customer
information.
Savings associations and their
subsidiaries (except brokers, dealers,
persons providing insurance,
investment companies, and investment
advisers) must comply with the
Interagency Guidelines Establishing
Information Security Standards set forth
in appendix B to part 570 of this
chapter. Supplement A to appendix B to
part 570 of this chapter provides
interpretive guidance.
Dated: May 25, 2005.
By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Richard M. Riccobono,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 05–10931 Filed 6–1–05; 8:45 am]
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Jun 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
RIN 2120–AA66
Establishment of Area Navigation
Routes; FL
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action establishes seven
high altitude area navigation (RNAV)
routes in Florida in support of the High
Altitude Redesign (HAR) program. The
FAA originally proposed to establish
eight routes as part of this action, but
one route was deleted due to
operational problems with the route
alignment. The FAA is taking this action
to enhance safety and to facilitate the
more flexible and efficient use of the
navigable airspace within the
Jacksonville Air Route Traffic Control
Center’s (ARTCC) area of responsibility.
DATES: 0901 UTC, September 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Gallant, Airspace and Rules, Office of
System Operations and Safety, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202)
267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
2. Revise § 568.5 to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 6720–01–P
14 CFR Part 71
History
On February 7, 2005, the FAA
published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to
establish eight RNAV routes in Florida
in support of the HAR program (70 FR
6376). Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking
proceeding by submitting written
comments on this proposal to the FAA.
No comments were received in response
to the proposal.
Discussion
During the comment period, the FAA
reviewed the results of modeling
simulations conducted to evaluate the
safety and efficiency of the proposed Q
route structure. Based on the results of
the tests, and on further refinements to
the route designs, the FAA determined
that changes are required to the
descriptions of three routes that were
proposed in the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) (Q–104, Q–106,
and Q–110), and that one proposed
route (Q–114) will not be implemented
as planned.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32229
Two minor changes will be made to
Q–104. First, the waypoint named
MARVE in the proposal, was
subsequently renamed SWABE. The
latitude and longitude coordinates for
this waypoint remain unchanged from
those stated in the proposal. Second, Q–
104 is modified by the insertion of a
new fix, the St. Petersburg Very High
Frequency Omnidirectional Range/
Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC)
(PIE), between SWABE and the Cypress
VOR/DME (CYY). This modification
adds PIE to Q–104 as a transition fix for
aircraft arrivals destined for Fort
Lauderdale. This change will realign the
route slightly eastward to pass over the
PIE VORTAC. This change will cause
the route to more closely match current
air traffic procedures.
Route Q–106 will be realigned to
correct problems noted in the modeling
tests. Q–106 was initially designed to
turn westbound around the north side of
Warning Area W–470, but at a point
further south than current traffic is
allowed to turn. Simulations of this
proposed routing revealed conflictions
between northwest bound traffic and
Tampa arrivals just to the west of the
proposed BULZI intersection. To correct
this, BULZI will be relocated northwest
of its proposed position to delay the
westward turn. This new alignment will
reduce the traffic conflict potential,
while still providing reduced mileage
for users. In addition, a new waypoint,
DRABK, will be added to the Q–106
route description between BULZI and
GADAY. The new waypoint will ensure
that the Q–106 route remains clear of
the Florida air traffic control assigned
airspace area.
In route Q–110, the FEONA waypoint,
located at the northwest end of the
route, will be moved less than one
nautical mile to the east of its present
position. This will provide a better
transition point for those aircraft exiting
Q–110 to join the Seminole transition
on the HONIE RNAV standard terminal
arrival route.
Proposed route Q–114 will be
eliminated from this rulemaking action.
The testing revealed numerous
difficulties with the proposed routing,
primarily with crossing conflicts
between Fort Lauderdale arrivals and
Fort Myers arrivals. Therefore, the FAA
has decided not to implement Q–114.
The Rule
The FAA is amending Title 14 Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71
by establishing seven RNAV routes in
Florida (designated Q–104, Q–106, Q–
108, Q–110, Q–112, Q–116, and Q–118)
within the airspace assigned to the
Jacksonville ARTCC. The FAA is taking
E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM
02JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 105 (Thursday, June 2, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32228-32229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-10931]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Thrift Supervision
12 CFR Part 568
[No. 2005-17]
RIN 1550-AB87
Proper Disposal of Consumer Information Under the Fair and
Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003
AGENCY: Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: OTS is making a technical amendment to its Security Procedures
rule to ensure that an amendment to that rule published December 28,
2004, and scheduled to take effect July 1, 2005, does not supersede an
amendment to that rule that was published and took effect March 29,
2005.
DATES: Effective July 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Bennett, Counsel, Regulations
and Legislation Division, (202) 906-7409.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
On December 28, 2004, OTS, along with the Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the Agencies), published in the
Federal Register a final rule entitled ``Proper Disposal of Consumer
Information Under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of
2003'' (69 FR 77610), implementing section 216 of the Fair and Accurate
Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACT Act). That rule included
conforming amendments to OTS's Security Procedures rule in Sec. 568.5
of Title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations. These conforming
amendments reflected the change to the title of Appendix B to part 570
of Title 12 from ``Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for
Safety and Soundness'' to ``Interagency Guidelines Establishing
Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information'' (Security Guidelines)
and the expansion of the legal basis for the Security Guidelines with
the implementation of section 216 of the FACT Act. These changes become
effective on July 1, 2005.
On March 29, 2005, the Agencies published in the Federal Register
(70 FR 15736) interpretive guidance and an OTS final rule entitled
``Interagency Guidance on Response Programs for Unauthorized Access to
Customer Information and Customer Notice.'' OTS codified its
interpretive guidance as Supplement A to its Security Guidelines in
Appendix B to Part 570. The final rule also made a conforming,
technical change to Sec. 568.5, which added a sentence at the end of
the section to reference the interpretive guidance in Supplement A.
On July 1, 2005, the December 28 rule text for Sec. 568.5 will
supersede the current text that became effective on March 29; however,
the sentence that was added by the March 29 final rule will still be
applicable and should remain as part of the rule text for Sec. 568.5
beyond June 30, 2005. Therefore, OTS is making a further technical
amendment to Sec. 568.5 effective July 1, 2005, to add the sentence
from the March 29 final rule that goes at the end of Sec. 568.5 so
that it will remain in effect when the December 28 final rule takes
effect on July 1.
II. Regulatory Analysis
Administrative Procedure Act; Riegle Community Development and
Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994
OTS finds that there is good cause to dispense with prior notice
and comment on this final rule and with the 30-day delay of effective
date mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act.\1\ OTS believes that
these procedures are unnecessary and contrary to public interest
because the rule merely makes a technical change to an existing
regulation. The amendment in the rule is not substantive and will not
affect savings associations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 5 U.S.C. 553.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 302 of the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory
Improvement Act of 1994 provides that regulations that impose
additional reporting, disclosure, or other new requirements may not
take effect before the first day of the quarter following
publication.\2\ This section does not apply because this final rule
imposes no additional requirements and makes only a technical change to
an existing regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Pub. L. 103-325, 12 U.S.C. 4802.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,\3\
the OTS Acting Director certifies that this technical amendment will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Pub. L. 96-354, 5 U.S.C. 601.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 32229]]
Executive Order 12866
OTS has determined that this rule is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
OTS has determined that the requirements of this final rule will
not result in expenditures by State, local, and tribal governments, or
by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year.
Accordingly, a budgetary impact statement is not required under section
202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 568
Consumer protection, Privacy, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Savings associations, Security measures.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, OTS amends part 568 of title
12 of chapter V of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 568--SECURITY PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for part 568 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1462a, 1463, 1464, 1467a, 1828, 1831p-1,
1881-1884; 15 U.S.C. 1681s and 1681w; 15 U.S.C. 6801 and 6805(b)(1).
0
2. Revise Sec. 568.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 568.5 Protection of customer information.
Savings associations and their subsidiaries (except brokers,
dealers, persons providing insurance, investment companies, and
investment advisers) must comply with the Interagency Guidelines
Establishing Information Security Standards set forth in appendix B to
part 570 of this chapter. Supplement A to appendix B to part 570 of
this chapter provides interpretive guidance.
Dated: May 25, 2005.
By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Richard M. Riccobono,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 05-10931 Filed 6-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-P