Establishment of Area Navigation Routes; FL, 32229-32231 [05-10904]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 105 / Thursday, June 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 12866
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OTS has determined that this rule is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Federal Aviation Administration
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
[Docket No. FAA–2004–19667; Airspace
Docket No. 04–ASO–13]
OTS has determined that the
requirements of this final rule will not
result in expenditures by State, local,
and tribal governments, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year. Accordingly, a
budgetary impact statement is not
required under section 202 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 568
Consumer protection, Privacy,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Savings associations,
Security measures.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, OTS amends part 568 of title
12 of chapter V of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
I
PART 568—SECURITY PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 568
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1462a, 1463, 1464,
1467a, 1828, 1831p–1, 1881–1884; 15 U.S.C.
1681s and 1681w; 15 U.S.C. 6801 and
6805(b)(1).
I
§ 568.5 Protection of customer
information.
Savings associations and their
subsidiaries (except brokers, dealers,
persons providing insurance,
investment companies, and investment
advisers) must comply with the
Interagency Guidelines Establishing
Information Security Standards set forth
in appendix B to part 570 of this
chapter. Supplement A to appendix B to
part 570 of this chapter provides
interpretive guidance.
Dated: May 25, 2005.
By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Richard M. Riccobono,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 05–10931 Filed 6–1–05; 8:45 am]
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Jun 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
RIN 2120–AA66
Establishment of Area Navigation
Routes; FL
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action establishes seven
high altitude area navigation (RNAV)
routes in Florida in support of the High
Altitude Redesign (HAR) program. The
FAA originally proposed to establish
eight routes as part of this action, but
one route was deleted due to
operational problems with the route
alignment. The FAA is taking this action
to enhance safety and to facilitate the
more flexible and efficient use of the
navigable airspace within the
Jacksonville Air Route Traffic Control
Center’s (ARTCC) area of responsibility.
DATES: 0901 UTC, September 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Gallant, Airspace and Rules, Office of
System Operations and Safety, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202)
267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
2. Revise § 568.5 to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 6720–01–P
14 CFR Part 71
History
On February 7, 2005, the FAA
published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to
establish eight RNAV routes in Florida
in support of the HAR program (70 FR
6376). Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking
proceeding by submitting written
comments on this proposal to the FAA.
No comments were received in response
to the proposal.
Discussion
During the comment period, the FAA
reviewed the results of modeling
simulations conducted to evaluate the
safety and efficiency of the proposed Q
route structure. Based on the results of
the tests, and on further refinements to
the route designs, the FAA determined
that changes are required to the
descriptions of three routes that were
proposed in the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) (Q–104, Q–106,
and Q–110), and that one proposed
route (Q–114) will not be implemented
as planned.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32229
Two minor changes will be made to
Q–104. First, the waypoint named
MARVE in the proposal, was
subsequently renamed SWABE. The
latitude and longitude coordinates for
this waypoint remain unchanged from
those stated in the proposal. Second, Q–
104 is modified by the insertion of a
new fix, the St. Petersburg Very High
Frequency Omnidirectional Range/
Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC)
(PIE), between SWABE and the Cypress
VOR/DME (CYY). This modification
adds PIE to Q–104 as a transition fix for
aircraft arrivals destined for Fort
Lauderdale. This change will realign the
route slightly eastward to pass over the
PIE VORTAC. This change will cause
the route to more closely match current
air traffic procedures.
Route Q–106 will be realigned to
correct problems noted in the modeling
tests. Q–106 was initially designed to
turn westbound around the north side of
Warning Area W–470, but at a point
further south than current traffic is
allowed to turn. Simulations of this
proposed routing revealed conflictions
between northwest bound traffic and
Tampa arrivals just to the west of the
proposed BULZI intersection. To correct
this, BULZI will be relocated northwest
of its proposed position to delay the
westward turn. This new alignment will
reduce the traffic conflict potential,
while still providing reduced mileage
for users. In addition, a new waypoint,
DRABK, will be added to the Q–106
route description between BULZI and
GADAY. The new waypoint will ensure
that the Q–106 route remains clear of
the Florida air traffic control assigned
airspace area.
In route Q–110, the FEONA waypoint,
located at the northwest end of the
route, will be moved less than one
nautical mile to the east of its present
position. This will provide a better
transition point for those aircraft exiting
Q–110 to join the Seminole transition
on the HONIE RNAV standard terminal
arrival route.
Proposed route Q–114 will be
eliminated from this rulemaking action.
The testing revealed numerous
difficulties with the proposed routing,
primarily with crossing conflicts
between Fort Lauderdale arrivals and
Fort Myers arrivals. Therefore, the FAA
has decided not to implement Q–114.
The Rule
The FAA is amending Title 14 Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71
by establishing seven RNAV routes in
Florida (designated Q–104, Q–106, Q–
108, Q–110, Q–112, Q–116, and Q–118)
within the airspace assigned to the
Jacksonville ARTCC. The FAA is taking
E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM
02JNR1
32230
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 105 / Thursday, June 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
this action in support of the HAR
program, to enhance safety, and to
facilitate the more flexible and efficient
use of the navigable airspace for en
route IFR operations within the
Jacksonville ARTCC area of
responsibility. Except for the changes
noted in the ‘‘Discussion’’ section
above, these routes are the same as those
proposed in the NPRM.
High altitude area navigation routes
are published in paragraph 2006 of FAA
Order 7400.9M dated August 30, 2004
and effective September 16, 2004, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The area navigation routes listed
in this document will be published
subsequently in the order.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with
Paragraph 311(a) of FAA Order 1050.1E,
Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures. This airspace action is not
expected to cause any potentially
significant impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that
warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by Reference,
Navigation (air).
The Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
I
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in 14
CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9M,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 30, 2004, and
effective September 16, 2004, is
amended as follows:
I
Paragraph 2006—Area Navigation
Routes.
*
*
*
*
*
Q–104 DEFUN to CYY [New]
DEFUN ...........................................................
HEVVN ..........................................................
PLYER ............................................................
SWABE ..........................................................
PIE ..................................................................
CYY ................................................................
WP .................................................................
WP .................................................................
WP .................................................................
WP .................................................................
VORTAC ........................................................
VOR/DME ......................................................
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
30°48′51″
29°49′19″
28°56′51″
28°35′16″
27°54′28″
26°09′12″
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
86°07′53″
83°53′43″
83°20′09″
83°06′31″
82°41′04″
81°46′41″
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
Q–106 SMELZ to GADAY [New]
SMELZ ...........................................................
BULZI ............................................................
DRABK ...........................................................
GADAY ..........................................................
WP
WP
WP
WP
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
28°04′59″
30°22′25″
30°47′25″
31°02′28″
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
long.
long.
long.
long.
82°06′34″
84°04′34″
85°10′22″
86°08′02″
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
Q–108 GADAY to CLAWZ [New]
GADAY ..........................................................
CLAWZ ..........................................................
WP .................................................................
WP .................................................................
(Lat. 31°02′28″ N., long. 86°08′02″ W.)
(Lat. 30°38′29″ N., long. 83°02′19″ W.)
Q–110
KPASA
BRUTS
GULFR
FEONA
WP
WP
WP
WP
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
KPASA to FEONA [New]
...........................................................
...........................................................
...........................................................
...........................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
28°10′34″
29°30′58″
30°12′23″
31°36′22″
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
long.
long.
long.
long.
81°54′27″
82°58′57″
83°33′08″
84°43′08″
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
Q–112 DEFUN to INPIN [New]
DEFUN ...........................................................
HEVVN ..........................................................
INPIN .............................................................
Q–116 KPASA to CEEYA [New]
KPASA ...........................................................
BRUTS ...........................................................
GULFR ...........................................................
CEEYA ...........................................................
WP .................................................................
WP .................................................................
WP .................................................................
(Lat. 30°48′51″ N., long. 86°07′53″ W.)
(Lat. 29°49′19″ N., long. 83°53′43″ W.)
(Lat. 28°33′13″ N., long. 81°48′27″ W.)
WP
WP
WP
WP
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
Q–118 KPASA to LENIE [New]
KPASA ...........................................................
BRUTS ...........................................................
LENIE .............................................................
WP .................................................................
WP .................................................................
WP .................................................................
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Jun 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28°10′34″
29°30′58″
30°12′23″
31°31′32″
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
long.
long.
long.
long.
81°54′27″
82°58′57″
83°33′08″
84°05′32″
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
(Lat. 28°10′34″ N., long. 81°54′27″ W.)
(Lat. 29°30′58″ N., long. 82°58′57″ W.)
(Lat. 31°33′58″ N., long. 83°50′50″ W.)
E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM
02JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 105 / Thursday, June 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
Correction of Publication
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 25,
2005.
Edith V. Parish,
Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules.
[FR Doc. 05–10904 Filed 6–1–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Accordingly, the publication of April
11, 2005 (70 FR 18297) is corrected as
follows:
I
§ 71.1
[Corrected]
ACE KS E5
Harper, KS [Corrected]
On page 18299, column 1, change the
Class E legal description as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
I
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
‘‘VORTAC 040° radial extending from the
7.4-mile radius of the airport to the VORTAC,
excluding that airspace east of long. 98° 00′
00″.’’
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
*
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20577; Airspace
Docket No. 05–ACE–14]
*
*
*
*
Issued in Kansas City, MO, on May 17,
2005.
Elizabeth S. Wallis,
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services
Operations.
[FR Doc. 05–10906 Filed 6–1–05; 8:45 am]
Modification of Class E Airspace;
Harper, KS; Correction
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
Direct final rule; confirmation of
effective date; correction.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document confirms the
effective date and corrects the legal
description of the direct final rule;
request for comments published in the
Federal Register on Monday, April 11,
2005 (70 FR 18297) which revises Class
E airspace at Harper, KS.
DATES:
Effective: 0901 UTC, July 7,
2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division,
Airspace Branch, ACE–520A, DOT
Regional Headquarters Building, Federal
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone:
(816) 329–2524.
The FAA
published this direct final rule with a
request for comments in the Federal
Register on April 11, 2005 (70 FR
18297). The FAA uses the direct final
rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA
believes that there will be no adverse
public comment. This direct final rule
advised the public that no adverse
comments were anticipated, and that
unless a written adverse comment, or a
written notice of intent to submit such
an adverse comment, were received
within the comment period, the
regulation would become effective on
July 7, 2005. A comment with merit
indicating a need to correct the legal
description was received. This notice
confirms that this direct final rule will
become effective on July 7, 2005 with a
correction made to the legal description
for the Class E Airspace, Harper, KS.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Jun 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[CGD13–05–001]
RIN 1625–AA01
Anchorage Grounds; Anacortes
General Anchorage and Cap Sante and
Hat Island Tug and Barge General
Anchorages, Anacortes, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing three general anchorages
and two tug and barge general
anchorages in the vicinity of Anacortes,
Washington. These anchorages will
reduce the risk of collisions, provide a
more orderly movement of tanker traffic
in and out of near by oil refineries, and
keep the approaches to Guemes Channel
open to transiting traffic while
providing ample room for barge
operations.
DATES:
This rule is effective on July 5,
2005.
Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
public docket [CGD13–05–001] and are
available for inspection or copying at
Sector Seattle between 8 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LTJG J. L. Hagen, Sector Seattle, 1519
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32231
Alaskan Way South, Seattle, WA 98134,
(206) 217–6231.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On March 1, 2005, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Anacortes General Anchorage
and Cap Sante and Hat Island Tug and
Barge General Anchorages, Anacortes,
WA in the Federal Register (70 FR
9892). We received no letters
commenting on the proposed rule. No
public meeting was requested, and none
was held.
Background and Purpose
The Guemes Channel and the waters
near Cap Sante and March Point are
used by oil tank ships and tugs and
barges and recreational vessels. In April
2000 the Captain of the Port (COTP)
Puget Sound, Port Angeles Pilots and
representatives from the local oil
industry and tug boat companies met to
discuss efforts to minimize conflicts
between vessels which transit Guemes
Channel and vessels which anchor near
Cap Sante and March Point. As a result
of this meeting, the Coast Guard
identified certain areas where vessels
may anchor without presenting an
unacceptably high risk of danger to
navigation. Because these anchorages
were not formally established, they are
not included on nautical charts nor
referenced in the Coast Pilot. Hence,
vessels transiting the area may not know
where vessels may be anchoring. This
final rule designates anchorage grounds
for certain vessels. These anchorages are
managed by Vessel Traffic Service (VTS)
Puget Sound on behalf of Sector Seattle
and the COTP Puget Sound.
Management of these anchorages will
reduce the risk of collisions and provide
a more orderly movement of tanker
traffic in and out of oil refineries at
March Point.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
No comments were received by the
Coast Guard as a result of our request for
comments in our NPRM. However, since
publication of our NPRM the Coast
Guard has stood-up Sector Seattle.
Sector Seattle is an internal
reorganization that combines Group
Seattle, Vessel Traffic Service Puget
Sound and Marine Safety Office Puget
Sound into a single command. The
Coast Guard has established a
continuity of operations whereby all
previous practices and procedures will
remain in effect until superseded by an
authorized Coast Guard official or
document. Effective May 10, 2005, all
existing missions and functions
performed by Group Seattle, Vessel
E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM
02JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 105 (Thursday, June 2, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32229-32231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-10904]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2004-19667; Airspace Docket No. 04-ASO-13]
RIN 2120-AA66
Establishment of Area Navigation Routes; FL
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action establishes seven high altitude area navigation
(RNAV) routes in Florida in support of the High Altitude Redesign (HAR)
program. The FAA originally proposed to establish eight routes as part
of this action, but one route was deleted due to operational problems
with the route alignment. The FAA is taking this action to enhance
safety and to facilitate the more flexible and efficient use of the
navigable airspace within the Jacksonville Air Route Traffic Control
Center's (ARTCC) area of responsibility.
DATES: 0901 UTC, September 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace and Rules,
Office of System Operations and Safety, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267-8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On February 7, 2005, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to establish eight RNAV routes in Florida
in support of the HAR program (70 FR 6376). Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking proceeding by submitting
written comments on this proposal to the FAA. No comments were received
in response to the proposal.
Discussion
During the comment period, the FAA reviewed the results of modeling
simulations conducted to evaluate the safety and efficiency of the
proposed Q route structure. Based on the results of the tests, and on
further refinements to the route designs, the FAA determined that
changes are required to the descriptions of three routes that were
proposed in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) (Q-104, Q-106, and
Q-110), and that one proposed route (Q-114) will not be implemented as
planned.
Two minor changes will be made to Q-104. First, the waypoint named
MARVE in the proposal, was subsequently renamed SWABE. The latitude and
longitude coordinates for this waypoint remain unchanged from those
stated in the proposal. Second, Q-104 is modified by the insertion of a
new fix, the St. Petersburg Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range/
Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC) (PIE), between SWABE and the Cypress
VOR/DME (CYY). This modification adds PIE to Q-104 as a transition fix
for aircraft arrivals destined for Fort Lauderdale. This change will
realign the route slightly eastward to pass over the PIE VORTAC. This
change will cause the route to more closely match current air traffic
procedures.
Route Q-106 will be realigned to correct problems noted in the
modeling tests. Q-106 was initially designed to turn westbound around
the north side of Warning Area W-470, but at a point further south than
current traffic is allowed to turn. Simulations of this proposed
routing revealed conflictions between northwest bound traffic and Tampa
arrivals just to the west of the proposed BULZI intersection. To
correct this, BULZI will be relocated northwest of its proposed
position to delay the westward turn. This new alignment will reduce the
traffic conflict potential, while still providing reduced mileage for
users. In addition, a new waypoint, DRABK, will be added to the Q-106
route description between BULZI and GADAY. The new waypoint will ensure
that the Q-106 route remains clear of the Florida air traffic control
assigned airspace area.
In route Q-110, the FEONA waypoint, located at the northwest end of
the route, will be moved less than one nautical mile to the east of its
present position. This will provide a better transition point for those
aircraft exiting Q-110 to join the Seminole transition on the HONIE
RNAV standard terminal arrival route.
Proposed route Q-114 will be eliminated from this rulemaking
action. The testing revealed numerous difficulties with the proposed
routing, primarily with crossing conflicts between Fort Lauderdale
arrivals and Fort Myers arrivals. Therefore, the FAA has decided not to
implement Q-114.
The Rule
The FAA is amending Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by establishing seven RNAV routes in Florida (designated Q-104,
Q-106, Q-108, Q-110, Q-112, Q-116, and Q-118) within the airspace
assigned to the Jacksonville ARTCC. The FAA is taking
[[Page 32230]]
this action in support of the HAR program, to enhance safety, and to
facilitate the more flexible and efficient use of the navigable
airspace for en route IFR operations within the Jacksonville ARTCC area
of responsibility. Except for the changes noted in the ``Discussion''
section above, these routes are the same as those proposed in the NPRM.
High altitude area navigation routes are published in paragraph
2006 of FAA Order 7400.9M dated August 30, 2004 and effective September
16, 2004, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The area
navigation routes listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the order.
The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with Paragraph 311(a) of FAA Order 1050.1E, Environmental Impacts:
Policies and Procedures. This airspace action is not expected to cause
any potentially significant impacts, and no extraordinary circumstances
exist that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by Reference, Navigation (air).
The Adoption of the Amendment
0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9M,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 30, 2004, and
effective September 16, 2004, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 2006--Area Navigation Routes.
* * * * *
Q-104 DEFUN to CYY [New]
DEFUN....................... WP.................. (Lat. 30[deg]48'51'' N., long. 86[deg]07'53'' W.)
HEVVN....................... WP.................. (Lat. 29[deg]49'19'' N., long. 83[deg]53'43'' W.)
PLYER....................... WP.................. (Lat. 28[deg]56'51'' N., long. 83[deg]20'09'' W.)
SWABE....................... WP.................. (Lat. 28[deg]35'16'' N., long. 83[deg]06'31'' W.)
PIE......................... VORTAC.............. (Lat. 27[deg]54'28'' N., long. 82[deg]41'04'' W.)
CYY......................... VOR/DME............. (Lat. 26[deg]09'12'' N., long. 81[deg]46'41'' W.)
Q-106 SMELZ to GADAY [New]
SMELZ....................... WP.................. (Lat. 28[deg]04'59'' N., long. 82[deg]06'34'' W.)
BULZI....................... WP.................. (Lat. 30[deg]22'25'' N., long. 84[deg]04'34'' W.)
DRABK....................... WP.................. (Lat. 30[deg]47'25'' N., long. 85[deg]10'22'' W.)
GADAY....................... WP.................. (Lat. 31[deg]02'28'' N., long. 86[deg]08'02'' W.)
Q-108 GADAY to CLAWZ [New]
GADAY....................... WP.................. (Lat. 31[deg]02'28'' N., long. 86[deg]08'02'' W.)
CLAWZ....................... WP.................. (Lat. 30[deg]38'29'' N., long. 83[deg]02'19'' W.)
Q-110 KPASA to FEONA [New]
KPASA....................... WP.................. (Lat. 28[deg]10'34'' N., long. 81[deg]54'27'' W.)
BRUTS....................... WP.................. (Lat. 29[deg]30'58'' N., long. 82[deg]58'57'' W.)
GULFR....................... WP.................. (Lat. 30[deg]12'23'' N., long. 83[deg]33'08'' W.)
FEONA....................... WP.................. (Lat. 31[deg]36'22'' N., long. 84[deg]43'08'' W.)
Q-112 DEFUN to INPIN [New]
DEFUN....................... WP.................. (Lat. 30[deg]48'51'' N., long. 86[deg]07'53'' W.)
HEVVN....................... WP.................. (Lat. 29[deg]49'19'' N., long. 83[deg]53'43'' W.)
INPIN....................... WP.................. (Lat. 28[deg]33'13'' N., long. 81[deg]48'27'' W.)
Q-116 KPASA to CEEYA [New]
KPASA....................... WP.................. (Lat. 28[deg]10'34'' N., long. 81[deg]54'27'' W.)
BRUTS....................... WP.................. (Lat. 29[deg]30'58'' N., long. 82[deg]58'57'' W.)
GULFR....................... WP.................. (Lat. 30[deg]12'23'' N., long. 83[deg]33'08'' W.)
CEEYA....................... WP.................. (Lat. 31[deg]31'32'' N., long. 84[deg]05'32'' W.)
Q-118 KPASA to LENIE [New]
KPASA....................... WP.................. (Lat. 28[deg]10'34'' N., long. 81[deg]54'27'' W.)
BRUTS....................... WP.................. (Lat. 29[deg]30'58'' N., long. 82[deg]58'57'' W.)
LENIE....................... WP.................. (Lat. 31[deg]33'58'' N., long. 83[deg]50'50'' W.)
[[Page 32231]]
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 25, 2005.
Edith V. Parish,
Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules.
[FR Doc. 05-10904 Filed 6-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P