Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Mitchell River, MA, 32233-32235 [05-10900]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 105 / Thursday, June 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(f), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation because this final rule
establishes anchorage grounds.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are available
in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through
1236, 2030, 2035, 2071, 33 CFR 1.05–1(g);
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. In § 110.230 add new paragraphs
(a)(15), (16), and (17), redesignate
paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(9) as (b)(7)
through (b)(15), respectively, and add
new paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(6) to
read as follows:
I
§ 110.230
Puget Sound Area, WA
(a) * * *
(15) Anacortes General Anchorages.
(i) Anacortes East (ANE) Anchorage
Area. The waters within a circular area
with a radius of 600 yards, having its
center at 48°31′27″ N., 122°33′45″ W.
[Datum: NAD 1983].
(ii) Anacortes Center (ANC)
Anchorage Area. The waters within a
circular area with a radius of 600 yards,
having its center at 48°30′54″ N,
122°34′06″ W. [Datum: NAD 1983].
(iii) Anacortes West (ANW)
Anchorage Area. The waters within a
circular area with a radius of 600 yards,
having its center at 48°31′09″ N,
122°34′55″ W. [Datum: NAD 1983].
(16) Cap Sante Tug and Barge General
Anchorage. The Cap Sante Tug and
Barge General Anchorage includes all
waters enclosed by a line connecting the
following points: 48°31′16″ N,
122°36′00″ W, which is approximately
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Jun 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
the northeast tip of Cap Sante; then
southeast to 48°30′53″ N, 122°35′28″ W;
then west southwest to 48°30′45″ N,
122°35′52″ W, approximately the south
tip of Cap Sante; then north along the
shoreline to the point of origin. [Datum:
NAD 1983].
(17) Hat Island Tug and Barge
General Anchorage. The Hat Island Tug
and Barge General Anchorage includes
all waters enclosed by a line connecting
the following points: 48°31′19″ N,
122°33′04″ W, near the west side of Hat
Island; then southwest to 48°30′37″ N,
122°33′38″ W; then east to 48°30′37″ N,
122°32′00″ W; then northwest to the
point of origin. [Datum: NAD 1983].
(b) Regulations.
(1) No vessel shall anchor in any
general anchorage described in
paragraph (a) of this section without
prior permission from the Captain of the
Port (COTP), or his authorized
representative. Vessel Traffic Service
Puget Sound is designated as the
COTP’s authorized representative. All
vessels should seek permission at least
48 hours prior to arrival at the
anchorage area in order to avoid
unnecessary delays.
(i) Except for the Anacortes General
Anchorages, a berth in a general
anchorage, if available, may be assigned
to any vessel by the Captain of the Port
or his authorized representative upon
application and he may grant revocable
permits for the continuous use of the
same berth. For the Anacortes General
Anchorages, the following hierarchy
will be applied for assignment of a
berth: tankers conducting lightering
operations, then loaded tankers, and
then all other vessels.
(ii) Tugs and oil barges using the Cap
Sante and Hat Island General
Anchorages are exempt from the
requirement to obtain the COTP’s
permission.
(2) Except for the Anacortes General
Anchorages, no vessel shall occupy any
general anchorage for a period longer
than 30 days unless a permit is obtained
from the Captain of the Port for that
purpose. There is a 10 days maximum
stay at the Anacortes East and Anacortes
Center general anchorages, and 6 day
maximum stay at the Anacortes West
general anchorage.
(3) The COTP or his authorized
representative may require vessels to
depart from the Anacortes General
Anchorage before the expiration of the
authorized or maximum stay. The COTP
or his authorized representative will
provide at least 24-hour notice to a
vessel required to depart the Anacortes
General Anchorage.
(4) No vessel in a condition such that
it is likely to sink or otherwise become
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32233
a menace or obstruction to the
navigation or anchorage of other vessels
shall occupy any general anchorage
except in an emergency and then only
for such period as may be permitted by
the Captain of the Port.
(5) Within the Anacortes General
Anchorages, lightering operations shall
only be conducted in the Anacortes
West and Anacortes Center anchorages.
(6) Tugs and barges using the Cap
Sante and Hat Island Barge General
Anchorages are required to ensure their
vessels and barges do not project
beyond the holding area’s boundaries.
The tug must be manned, remain in
attendance with the barge and maintain
a communications guard with VTS on
an appropriate VTS VHF radio working
frequency, which is currently channel
5A.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 13, 2005.
J.M. Garrett,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–10898 Filed 6–1–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01–05–006]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations:
Mitchell River, MA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has changed
the drawbridge operation regulations
that govern the operation of the
Chatham Highway Bridge, mile 0.2,
across the Mitchell River at Chatham,
Massachusetts. This final rule requires
that from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m., from May 1
through October 31, a one-hour advance
notice be given for a bridge opening.
This rulemaking also changes the oncall contact information. This action is
expected to better meet the reasonable
needs of navigation.
DATES: This rule is effective July 5,
2005.
Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket (CGD01–05–006) and are
available for inspection or copying at
the First Coast Guard District, Bridge
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM
02JNR1
32234
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 105 / Thursday, June 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Branch Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue,
Boston, Massachusetts, 02110, between
7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
John W. McDonald, Bridge
Administrator, First Coast Guard
District, (617) 223–8364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On February 23, 2005, we published
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation
Regulations; Mitchell River,
Massachusetts, in the Federal Register
(70 FR 8751). We received no comments
in response to the notice of proposed
rulemaking. No public hearing was
requested and none was held.
Background and Purpose
The Chatham Highway Bridge has a
vertical clearance in the closed position
of 8 feet at mean high water and 12 feet
at mean low water. The existing
drawbridge operation regulations are
listed at 33 CFR 117.607.
The Town of Chatham, the owner of
the bridge, asked the Coast Guard to
change the drawbridge operation
regulations for the Chatham Highway
Bridge to extend the one-hour advance
notice requirement to include the 4 p.m.
to 5 p.m. hour May 1 through October
31. The existing regulations require the
bridge to open on signal after a one-hour
advance notice is given between 8 a.m.
and 4 p.m. This final rule will extend
that one-hour advance notice
requirement to include the 4 p.m. to 5
p.m. time during May through October.
Also, the on-call contact person
would be changed from the duty officer
at the Chatham Police Department to the
Chatham Harbormaster at the Chatham
Harbormasters Department.
Discussion of comments and changes
The Coast Guard received no
comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking and as a result, no
changes have been made to this final
rule.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3), of
that Order. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
that Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under
the regulatory policies and procedures
of the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Jun 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
This conclusion is based on the fact
that the bridge will open after a onehour advance notice from 8 a.m. to 5
p.m. for vessel traffic from May 1
through October 31.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b), that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This conclusion is based on the fact
that the bridge will open an additional
hour each day for vessel traffic from
May 1 through October 31.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we offered to assist small entities
in understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process.
No small entities requested Coast
Guard assistance and none was given.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This final rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM
02JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 105 / Thursday, June 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
§ 117.607
Mitchell River.
Dated: May 23, 2005.
David P. Pekoske,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–10900 Filed 6–1–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
We have analyzed this final rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. It has been determined
that this final rule does not significantly
impact the environment.
[CGD08–05–030]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
White River, Augusta, AR
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation
governing the operation of the Missouri
Pacific Railroad Bridge, Mile 196.3,
Augusta, Arkansas across the White
River. This deviation allows the bridge
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
to remain in the closed-to-navigation
position for 7 days from 7 a.m., June 20,
Bridges.
2005, until 7 p.m., June 26, 2005. The
Regulations
deviation is necessary to allow time for
making repairs to mechanical
I For the reasons set out in the preamble,
the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 117 components essential to the continued
safe operation of the drawbridge.
as follows:
DATES: This temporary deviation is
effective from 7 a.m., June 20, 2005,
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
until 7 p.m., June 26, 2005.
OPERATION REGULATIONS
ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this
I 1. The authority citation for part 117
document are available for inspection or
continues to read as follows:
copying at Room 2.107F in the Robert A.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Young Federal Building, 1222 Spruce
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 Street, St. Louis, MO 63103–2832,
CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued
between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Stat. 5039.
The Bridge Administration Branch
maintains the public docket for this
I 2. Section 117.607 is revised to read as
temporary deviation.
follows:
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Jun 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Roger
K. Wiebusch, Bridge Administrator,
(314) 539–3900, extension 2378.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Union
Pacific Railroad requested a temporary
deviation to allow time to conduct
repairs to the Missouri Pacific Railroad
Bridge, mile 196.3, at Augusta, Arkansas
across the White River. The Missouri
Pacific Railroad Bridge currently
operates in accordance with 33 CFR
117.139(b), which requires the
drawbridge to open on signal if at least
eight hours notice is given. In order to
facilitate required bridge maintenance,
the bridge must be kept in the closedto-navigation position. This deviation
allows the drawbridge to remain in the
closed-to-navigation position for 7 days
from 7 a.m., June 20, 2005, until 7 p.m.,
June 26, 2005. There are no alternate
routes for vessels transiting this section
of the White River.
The Missouri Pacific Railroad Bridge,
in the closed-to-navigation position,
provides a vertical clearance of
approximately 32 feet above mean low
water. Navigation on the waterway
consists of some commercial tows
during the navigation season and mostly
recreational watercraft. This deviation
has been coordinated with waterway
users. No objections were received.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c),
this work will be performed with all due
speed in order to return the bridge to
normal operation as soon as possible.
This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR
117.35.
FOR FUTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Chatham Highway Bridge, at mile
0.2, at Chatham, Massachusetts, shall
operate as follows:
(a) From May 1 through October 31,
the draw shall open on signal from 8
a.m. to 5 p.m., if at least one-hour notice
is given and from 5 p.m. to 8 a.m. the
draw shall open on signal if at least 12hours notice is given by calling the
Chatham Harbormasters Department.
(b) From November 1 through April
30, the draw shall open on signal if at
least a 24-hours advance notice is given
by calling the Chatham Harbormasters
Department.
Environment
32235
Dated: May 24, 2005.
Roger K. Wiebusch,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05–10942 Filed 6–1–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD07–05–031]
RIN 1625–AA11, 1625–AA87 and 1625–AA09
Regulated Navigation Area, Security
Zone and Drawbridge Operation
Regulations; Port Everglades, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary regulated
navigation area, temporary security zone
E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM
02JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 105 (Thursday, June 2, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32233-32235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-10900]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01-05-006]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Mitchell River, MA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has changed the drawbridge operation
regulations that govern the operation of the Chatham Highway Bridge,
mile 0.2, across the Mitchell River at Chatham, Massachusetts. This
final rule requires that from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m., from May 1 through
October 31, a one-hour advance notice be given for a bridge opening.
This rulemaking also changes the on-call contact information. This
action is expected to better meet the reasonable needs of navigation.
DATES: This rule is effective July 5, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket (CGD01-05-006) and are available for inspection or
copying at the First Coast Guard District, Bridge
[[Page 32234]]
Branch Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts, 02110,
between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John W. McDonald, Bridge
Administrator, First Coast Guard District, (617) 223-8364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On February 23, 2005, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Mitchell River,
Massachusetts, in the Federal Register (70 FR 8751). We received no
comments in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking. No public
hearing was requested and none was held.
Background and Purpose
The Chatham Highway Bridge has a vertical clearance in the closed
position of 8 feet at mean high water and 12 feet at mean low water.
The existing drawbridge operation regulations are listed at 33 CFR
117.607.
The Town of Chatham, the owner of the bridge, asked the Coast Guard
to change the drawbridge operation regulations for the Chatham Highway
Bridge to extend the one-hour advance notice requirement to include the
4 p.m. to 5 p.m. hour May 1 through October 31. The existing
regulations require the bridge to open on signal after a one-hour
advance notice is given between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. This final rule will
extend that one-hour advance notice requirement to include the 4 p.m.
to 5 p.m. time during May through October.
Also, the on-call contact person would be changed from the duty
officer at the Chatham Police Department to the Chatham Harbormaster at
the Chatham Harbormasters Department.
Discussion of comments and changes
The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking and as a result, no changes have been made to this
final rule.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3), of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will open
after a one-hour advance notice from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. for vessel
traffic from May 1 through October 31.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will open an
additional hour each day for vessel traffic from May 1 through October
31.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
No small entities requested Coast Guard assistance and none was
given.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one
year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This final rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have substantial direct effect on one
or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office
[[Page 32235]]
of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement
of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this final rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. It has been determined that this final
rule does not significantly impact the environment.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulations
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR
part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.
0
2. Section 117.607 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 117.607 Mitchell River.
The Chatham Highway Bridge, at mile 0.2, at Chatham, Massachusetts,
shall operate as follows:
(a) From May 1 through October 31, the draw shall open on signal
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., if at least one-hour notice is given and from 5
p.m. to 8 a.m. the draw shall open on signal if at least 12-hours
notice is given by calling the Chatham Harbormasters Department.
(b) From November 1 through April 30, the draw shall open on signal
if at least a 24-hours advance notice is given by calling the Chatham
Harbormasters Department.
Dated: May 23, 2005.
David P. Pekoske,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05-10900 Filed 6-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P