Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Mitchell River, MA, 32233-32235 [05-10900]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 105 / Thursday, June 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations Environment We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(f), of the Instruction, from further environmental documentation because this final rule establishes anchorage grounds. A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical Exclusion Determination’’ are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110 Anchorage grounds. I For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 110 as follows: PART 110—ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS 1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2030, 2035, 2071, 33 CFR 1.05–1(g); Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 2. In § 110.230 add new paragraphs (a)(15), (16), and (17), redesignate paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(9) as (b)(7) through (b)(15), respectively, and add new paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(6) to read as follows: I § 110.230 Puget Sound Area, WA (a) * * * (15) Anacortes General Anchorages. (i) Anacortes East (ANE) Anchorage Area. The waters within a circular area with a radius of 600 yards, having its center at 48°31′27″ N., 122°33′45″ W. [Datum: NAD 1983]. (ii) Anacortes Center (ANC) Anchorage Area. The waters within a circular area with a radius of 600 yards, having its center at 48°30′54″ N, 122°34′06″ W. [Datum: NAD 1983]. (iii) Anacortes West (ANW) Anchorage Area. The waters within a circular area with a radius of 600 yards, having its center at 48°31′09″ N, 122°34′55″ W. [Datum: NAD 1983]. (16) Cap Sante Tug and Barge General Anchorage. The Cap Sante Tug and Barge General Anchorage includes all waters enclosed by a line connecting the following points: 48°31′16″ N, 122°36′00″ W, which is approximately VerDate jul<14>2003 15:00 Jun 01, 2005 Jkt 205001 the northeast tip of Cap Sante; then southeast to 48°30′53″ N, 122°35′28″ W; then west southwest to 48°30′45″ N, 122°35′52″ W, approximately the south tip of Cap Sante; then north along the shoreline to the point of origin. [Datum: NAD 1983]. (17) Hat Island Tug and Barge General Anchorage. The Hat Island Tug and Barge General Anchorage includes all waters enclosed by a line connecting the following points: 48°31′19″ N, 122°33′04″ W, near the west side of Hat Island; then southwest to 48°30′37″ N, 122°33′38″ W; then east to 48°30′37″ N, 122°32′00″ W; then northwest to the point of origin. [Datum: NAD 1983]. (b) Regulations. (1) No vessel shall anchor in any general anchorage described in paragraph (a) of this section without prior permission from the Captain of the Port (COTP), or his authorized representative. Vessel Traffic Service Puget Sound is designated as the COTP’s authorized representative. All vessels should seek permission at least 48 hours prior to arrival at the anchorage area in order to avoid unnecessary delays. (i) Except for the Anacortes General Anchorages, a berth in a general anchorage, if available, may be assigned to any vessel by the Captain of the Port or his authorized representative upon application and he may grant revocable permits for the continuous use of the same berth. For the Anacortes General Anchorages, the following hierarchy will be applied for assignment of a berth: tankers conducting lightering operations, then loaded tankers, and then all other vessels. (ii) Tugs and oil barges using the Cap Sante and Hat Island General Anchorages are exempt from the requirement to obtain the COTP’s permission. (2) Except for the Anacortes General Anchorages, no vessel shall occupy any general anchorage for a period longer than 30 days unless a permit is obtained from the Captain of the Port for that purpose. There is a 10 days maximum stay at the Anacortes East and Anacortes Center general anchorages, and 6 day maximum stay at the Anacortes West general anchorage. (3) The COTP or his authorized representative may require vessels to depart from the Anacortes General Anchorage before the expiration of the authorized or maximum stay. The COTP or his authorized representative will provide at least 24-hour notice to a vessel required to depart the Anacortes General Anchorage. (4) No vessel in a condition such that it is likely to sink or otherwise become PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 32233 a menace or obstruction to the navigation or anchorage of other vessels shall occupy any general anchorage except in an emergency and then only for such period as may be permitted by the Captain of the Port. (5) Within the Anacortes General Anchorages, lightering operations shall only be conducted in the Anacortes West and Anacortes Center anchorages. (6) Tugs and barges using the Cap Sante and Hat Island Barge General Anchorages are required to ensure their vessels and barges do not project beyond the holding area’s boundaries. The tug must be manned, remain in attendance with the barge and maintain a communications guard with VTS on an appropriate VTS VHF radio working frequency, which is currently channel 5A. * * * * * Dated: May 13, 2005. J.M. Garrett, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. 05–10898 Filed 6–1–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 117 [CGD01–05–006] RIN 1625–AA09 Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Mitchell River, MA Coast Guard, DHS. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has changed the drawbridge operation regulations that govern the operation of the Chatham Highway Bridge, mile 0.2, across the Mitchell River at Chatham, Massachusetts. This final rule requires that from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m., from May 1 through October 31, a one-hour advance notice be given for a bridge opening. This rulemaking also changes the oncall contact information. This action is expected to better meet the reasonable needs of navigation. DATES: This rule is effective July 5, 2005. Comments and material received from the public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket, are part of docket (CGD01–05–006) and are available for inspection or copying at the First Coast Guard District, Bridge ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM 02JNR1 32234 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 105 / Thursday, June 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations Branch Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts, 02110, between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John W. McDonald, Bridge Administrator, First Coast Guard District, (617) 223–8364. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulatory Information On February 23, 2005, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Mitchell River, Massachusetts, in the Federal Register (70 FR 8751). We received no comments in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking. No public hearing was requested and none was held. Background and Purpose The Chatham Highway Bridge has a vertical clearance in the closed position of 8 feet at mean high water and 12 feet at mean low water. The existing drawbridge operation regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.607. The Town of Chatham, the owner of the bridge, asked the Coast Guard to change the drawbridge operation regulations for the Chatham Highway Bridge to extend the one-hour advance notice requirement to include the 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. hour May 1 through October 31. The existing regulations require the bridge to open on signal after a one-hour advance notice is given between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. This final rule will extend that one-hour advance notice requirement to include the 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. time during May through October. Also, the on-call contact person would be changed from the duty officer at the Chatham Police Department to the Chatham Harbormaster at the Chatham Harbormasters Department. Discussion of comments and changes The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking and as a result, no changes have been made to this final rule. Regulatory Evaluation This rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3), of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). VerDate jul<14>2003 15:00 Jun 01, 2005 Jkt 205001 This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will open after a onehour advance notice from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. for vessel traffic from May 1 through October 31. Small Entities Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will open an additional hour each day for vessel traffic from May 1 through October 31. Assistance for Small Entities Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104– 121), we offered to assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. No small entities requested Coast Guard assistance and none was given. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency’s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). Collection of Information This rule calls for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520). Federalism A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 determined that it does not have implications for federalism. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. Taking of Private Property This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. Civil Justice Reform This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. Protection of Children We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect children. Indian Tribal Governments This final rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Energy Effects We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under that order because it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM 02JNR1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 105 / Thursday, June 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211. Technical Standards The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. § 117.607 Mitchell River. Dated: May 23, 2005. David P. Pekoske, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. 05–10900 Filed 6–1–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 117 We have analyzed this final rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, from further environmental documentation. It has been determined that this final rule does not significantly impact the environment. [CGD08–05–030] RIN 1625–AA09 Drawbridge Operation Regulation; White River, Augusta, AR Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of temporary deviation from regulations. AGENCY: ACTION: The Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District has issued a temporary deviation from the regulation governing the operation of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Bridge, Mile 196.3, Augusta, Arkansas across the White River. This deviation allows the bridge List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 to remain in the closed-to-navigation position for 7 days from 7 a.m., June 20, Bridges. 2005, until 7 p.m., June 26, 2005. The Regulations deviation is necessary to allow time for making repairs to mechanical I For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 117 components essential to the continued safe operation of the drawbridge. as follows: DATES: This temporary deviation is effective from 7 a.m., June 20, 2005, PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE until 7 p.m., June 26, 2005. OPERATION REGULATIONS ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this I 1. The authority citation for part 117 document are available for inspection or continues to read as follows: copying at Room 2.107F in the Robert A. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of Young Federal Building, 1222 Spruce Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 Street, St. Louis, MO 63103–2832, CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106 through Friday, except Federal holidays. Stat. 5039. The Bridge Administration Branch maintains the public docket for this I 2. Section 117.607 is revised to read as temporary deviation. follows: VerDate jul<14>2003 15:00 Jun 01, 2005 Jkt 205001 SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Roger K. Wiebusch, Bridge Administrator, (314) 539–3900, extension 2378. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Union Pacific Railroad requested a temporary deviation to allow time to conduct repairs to the Missouri Pacific Railroad Bridge, mile 196.3, at Augusta, Arkansas across the White River. The Missouri Pacific Railroad Bridge currently operates in accordance with 33 CFR 117.139(b), which requires the drawbridge to open on signal if at least eight hours notice is given. In order to facilitate required bridge maintenance, the bridge must be kept in the closedto-navigation position. This deviation allows the drawbridge to remain in the closed-to-navigation position for 7 days from 7 a.m., June 20, 2005, until 7 p.m., June 26, 2005. There are no alternate routes for vessels transiting this section of the White River. The Missouri Pacific Railroad Bridge, in the closed-to-navigation position, provides a vertical clearance of approximately 32 feet above mean low water. Navigation on the waterway consists of some commercial tows during the navigation season and mostly recreational watercraft. This deviation has been coordinated with waterway users. No objections were received. In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c), this work will be performed with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as soon as possible. This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. FOR FUTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Chatham Highway Bridge, at mile 0.2, at Chatham, Massachusetts, shall operate as follows: (a) From May 1 through October 31, the draw shall open on signal from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., if at least one-hour notice is given and from 5 p.m. to 8 a.m. the draw shall open on signal if at least 12hours notice is given by calling the Chatham Harbormasters Department. (b) From November 1 through April 30, the draw shall open on signal if at least a 24-hours advance notice is given by calling the Chatham Harbormasters Department. Environment 32235 Dated: May 24, 2005. Roger K. Wiebusch, Bridge Administrator. [FR Doc. 05–10942 Filed 6–1–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 117 33 CFR Part 165 [CGD07–05–031] RIN 1625–AA11, 1625–AA87 and 1625–AA09 Regulated Navigation Area, Security Zone and Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Port Everglades, FL Coast Guard, DHS. Temporary final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary regulated navigation area, temporary security zone E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM 02JNR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 105 (Thursday, June 2, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32233-32235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-10900]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01-05-006]
RIN 1625-AA09


Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Mitchell River, MA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has changed the drawbridge operation 
regulations that govern the operation of the Chatham Highway Bridge, 
mile 0.2, across the Mitchell River at Chatham, Massachusetts. This 
final rule requires that from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m., from May 1 through 
October 31, a one-hour advance notice be given for a bridge opening. 
This rulemaking also changes the on-call contact information. This 
action is expected to better meet the reasonable needs of navigation.

DATES: This rule is effective July 5, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as 
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket, 
are part of docket (CGD01-05-006) and are available for inspection or 
copying at the First Coast Guard District, Bridge

[[Page 32234]]

Branch Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts, 02110, 
between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John W. McDonald, Bridge 
Administrator, First Coast Guard District, (617) 223-8364.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    On February 23, 2005, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking 
(NPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Mitchell River, 
Massachusetts, in the Federal Register (70 FR 8751). We received no 
comments in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking. No public 
hearing was requested and none was held.

Background and Purpose

    The Chatham Highway Bridge has a vertical clearance in the closed 
position of 8 feet at mean high water and 12 feet at mean low water. 
The existing drawbridge operation regulations are listed at 33 CFR 
117.607.
    The Town of Chatham, the owner of the bridge, asked the Coast Guard 
to change the drawbridge operation regulations for the Chatham Highway 
Bridge to extend the one-hour advance notice requirement to include the 
4 p.m. to 5 p.m. hour May 1 through October 31. The existing 
regulations require the bridge to open on signal after a one-hour 
advance notice is given between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. This final rule will 
extend that one-hour advance notice requirement to include the 4 p.m. 
to 5 p.m. time during May through October.
    Also, the on-call contact person would be changed from the duty 
officer at the Chatham Police Department to the Chatham Harbormaster at 
the Chatham Harbormasters Department.

Discussion of comments and changes

    The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the notice of 
proposed rulemaking and as a result, no changes have been made to this 
final rule.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does 
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3), of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the 
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS).
    This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will open 
after a one-hour advance notice from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. for vessel 
traffic from May 1 through October 31.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will open an 
additional hour each day for vessel traffic from May 1 through October 
31.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we offered to assist small 
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate 
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    No small entities requested Coast Guard assistance and none was 
given.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247).

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal government, in the 
aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one 
year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do 
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This final rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have substantial direct effect on one 
or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office

[[Page 32235]]

of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a 
significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement 
of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this final rule under Commandant Instruction 
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and 
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit 
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the 
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under 
figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, from further 
environmental documentation. It has been determined that this final 
rule does not significantly impact the environment.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

Regulations

0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR 
part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); section 117.255 also issued 
under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.


0
2. Section 117.607 is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  117.607  Mitchell River.

    The Chatham Highway Bridge, at mile 0.2, at Chatham, Massachusetts, 
shall operate as follows:
    (a) From May 1 through October 31, the draw shall open on signal 
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., if at least one-hour notice is given and from 5 
p.m. to 8 a.m. the draw shall open on signal if at least 12-hours 
notice is given by calling the Chatham Harbormasters Department.
    (b) From November 1 through April 30, the draw shall open on signal 
if at least a 24-hours advance notice is given by calling the Chatham 
Harbormasters Department.

    Dated: May 23, 2005.
David P. Pekoske,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05-10900 Filed 6-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.