Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee Findings and Recommendations Regarding a Dispute Between Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai'i Nei and the Bishop Museum, 31513-31514 [05-10809]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 104 / Wednesday, June 1, 2005 / Notices
Representatives of any other Indian
tribe that believes itself to be culturally
affiliated with the human remains
should contact Nell Murphy, Director of
Cultural Resources, American Museum
of Natural History, Central Park West at
79th Street, New York, NY 10024–5192,
telephone (212) 769–5837, before July 1,
2005. Repatriation of the human
remains to the Blackfeet Tribe of the
Blackfeet Indian Reservation of Montana
may proceed after that date if no
additional claimants come forward.
The American Museum of Natural
History is responsible for notifying
Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian
Reservation of Montana that this notice
has been published.
Dated: May 20, 2005
Paul Hoffman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Fish and Wildlife
and Parks.
[FR Doc. 05–10819 Filed 5–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Intent to Repatriate a Cultural
Item: Berkshire Museum, Pittsfield, MA
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice is here given in accordance
with the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3005, of the intent
to repatriate a cultural item in the
possession of the Berkshire Museum,
Pittsfield, MA, that meets the definition
of ‘‘sacred object’’ and ‘‘cultural
patrimony’’ under 25 U.S.C. 3001.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations
in this notice are the sole responsibility
of the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the cultural
items. The National Park Service is not
responsible for the determinations in
this notice.
The cultural item is a clay pipe bowl.
The 4–inch x 1.25–inch pipe bowl is a
brown-gray ceramic cylindrical tube
with a tapered end and bent at a 120
degree angle 1 inch from the flared end;
both ends of the pipe are chipped,
revealing dark gray ceramic material
with flecks of white temper. It was
excavated in 1863 from an unknown site
in Pittsfield, Berkshire County, MA, by
S.L. Werden and given to the Berkshire
Museum on an unknown date. It was
found in the collection in 1992. Tribal
representatives identified the clay pipe
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:22 May 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
bowl as an instrument belonging to the
Stockbridge-Munsee Band of Mohican
Indians (now known as the StockbridgeMunsee Community, Wisconsin). The
bowl has been dated to the Late
Woodland period (circa A.D. 1000–
1580).
Representatives of the StockbridgeMunsee Community, Wisconsin
indicated during consultation that this
cultural item is a specific ceremonial
object needed for the continuation of
traditions and rituals within the tribe.
Throughout Mohican Indian history,
pipe bowls of this type have been used
to seal peace treaties between rival
groups, as religious offerings to higher
spirits, and as funerary gifts to the
deceased.
Officials of the Berkshire Museum
have determined that, pursuant to 25
U.S.C. 3001 (3)(C), the cultural item is
a specific ceremonial object needed by
traditional Native American religious
leaders for the practice of traditional
Native American religions by their
present-day adherents, and that,
pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (3)(D), the
cultural item has ongoing historical,
traditional or cultural importance
central to the Native American group or
culture itself, rather than property
owned by an individual. Officials of the
Berkshire Museum also have
determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S. C.
3001 (2), there is a relationship of
shared group identity that can be
reasonably traced between the sacred
object/cultural patrimony and the
Stockbridge-Munsee Community,
Wisconsin.
Representatives of any other Indian
tribe that believes itself to be culturally
affiliated with the sacred object/cultural
patrimony should contact Nezka Pfeifer,
Collections Manager, Berkshire
Museum, 39 South Street, Pittsfield, MA
01201, telephone (413) 443–7171, before
July 1, 2005. Repatriation of the sacred
object/cultural patrimony to the
Stockbridge-Munsee Community,
Wisconsin may proceed after that date
if no additional claimants come
forward.
The Berkshire Museum is responsible
for notifying the Stockbridge-Munsee
Community, Wisconsin that this notice
has been published.
Dated: May 20, 2005.
Paul Hoffman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Fish and Wildlife
and Parks.
[FR Doc. 05–10806 Filed 5–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–S
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31513
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Native American Graves Protection
and Repatriation Review Committee
Findings and Recommendations
Regarding a Dispute Between Hui
Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai’i Nei and
the Bishop Museum
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: At a March 13–15, 2005,
public meeting in Honolulu, HI, the
Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Review Committee (Review
Committee) considered a dispute
between Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O
Hawai’i Nei and the Bishop Museum.
The dispute focused on the disposition
of carved sandstone blocks from the
Island of Moloka’i known as Kalaina
Wawae that are under the control of the
Bishop Museum. The Review
Committee recommended that the
Bishop Museum and Hui Malama o
Mo’omomi work together to revise
expeditiously the current memorandum
of agreement to require the consent of
Hui Malama o Mo’omomi prior to the
removal of the Kalaina Wawae from the
Island of Molokai.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
9, 1999, the Bishop Museum published
a Notice of Intent to Repatriate in the
Federal Register. The notice identified
three sandstone blocks containing
carved footprints, also known as Kalaina
Wawae, as objects of cultural patrimony
culturally affiliated with Hui Malama I
Na Kupuna O Hawai’i Nei.
On March 4, 2003, the Bishop
Museum and Hui Malama O Mo’omomi
signed a memorandum of agreement to
place the Kalaina Wawae at Mo’omomi,
Island of Moloka’i. Hand written at the
bottom of the memorandum of
agreement is the following: ‘‘Signed
under protest because Hui Malama I Na
Kupuna O Hawai’i Nei was removed
from this agreement without
explanation by Bishop Museum to any
of the parties. This act demonstrates a
lack of respect on the part of the
museum.’’ The Kalaina Wawae were
moved to Mo’omomi on the Island of
Moloka’i.
On November 3, 2003, the Bishop
Museum published a correction in the
Federal Register rescinding the April 9,
1999, notice. The correction states that
the Bishop Museum does not intend to
repatriate the Kalaina Wawae to the
Native Hawaiian organizations that
previously presented claims.
On November 29, 2004, Hui Malama
I Na Kupuna O Hawai’i Nei requested
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
31514
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 104 / Wednesday, June 1, 2005 / Notices
the assistance of the Review Committee
in resolving its dispute with the Bishop
Museum as to whether repatriation of
the Kalaina Wawae to Hui Malama I Na
Kupuna O Hawai’i Nei was complete
when no competing claims were filed
following publication of the April 9,
1999, Federal Register notice.
On December 17, 2004, the Review
Committee’s designated Federal officer
acknowledged receipt of the November
29, 2004, request and identified
questions as to whether the Kalaina
Wawae are objects of cultural patrimony
as an issue of fact with which the
Review Committee might wish to assist
in resolving. The request for a
recommendation regarding the finality
of repatriation, which is likely
dependent on provisions of state law
and other legal authorities, was
identified as being beyond the Review
Committee’s purview.
On February 2, 2005, the Bishop
Museum provided information to the
Review Committee relevant to the
dispute, including a declaration that the
museum does not consider the Kalaina
Wawae to be objects of cultural
patrimony.
On February 21, 2005, the Review
Committee’s designated Federal officer
notified Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O
Hawai’i Nei and the Bishop Museum
that the Review Committee had agreed
to assist in the resolution of the dispute
at its next meeting.
On March 1, 2005, the Review
Committee’s designated Federal officer
invited a representative of Hui Malama
O Mo’omomi to provide information to
the Review Committee.
Findings and Recommendations: On
March 13–15, 2005, the Review
Committee considered the dispute as
presented by representatives of Hui
Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai’i Nei,
Bishop Museum, and Hui Malama o
Mo’omomi and made the following
findings:
1. There is disagreement regarding
whether the Kalaina Wawae are objects
of cultural patrimony.
2. The Review Committee has chosen
not to come to a finding as to whether
the Kalaina Wawae are objects of
cultural patrimony at this time.
3. The Review Committee recognizes
the cultural significance of the Kalaina
Wawae to the people of the Island of
Molokai.
4. The Review Committee believes
that the current location of the Kalaina
Wawae is appropriate.
The Review Committee recommends
that the Bishop Museum and Hui
Malama o Mo’omomi work together to
revise expeditiously the current
memorandum of agreement to require
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:22 May 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
the consent of Hui Malama o Mo’omomi
prior to the removal of the Kalaina
Wawae from the Island of Molokai.
The National Park Service publishes
this notice as part of its administrative
and staff support for the Review
Committee. The findings and
recommendations are those of the
Review Committee and do not
necessarily represent the views of the
Secretary of the Interior. Neither the
Secretary of the Interior nor the National
Park Service has taken a position on
these matters.
Dated: May 20, 2005.
Rosita Worl,
Chair, Native American Graves Protection
and Repatriation Review Committee.
[FR Doc. 05–10809 Filed 5–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Native American Graves Protection
and Repatriation Review Committee
Findings and Recommendations
Regarding a Dispute Between Hui
Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai’i Nei and
the Bishop Museum
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: At a March 13–15, 2005,
public meeting in Honolulu, HI, the
Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Review Committee (Review
Committee) considered a dispute
between Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O
Hawai’i Nei and the Bishop Museum.
The dispute focused on whether three
items from the Island of Moloka’i in the
possession of the Bishop Museum are
subject to repatriation under provisions
of the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act. The
Review Committee recommended that
the Bishop Museum proceed toward
repatriation of the three objects to the
appropriate claimants.
On May 2,
2003, the Bishop Museum published a
Notice of Intent to Repatriate in the
Federal Register. The notice identified
a small wooden image carved into
human form and a cowrie shell as
unassociated funerary objects culturally
affiliated with the Moloka’i Burial
Council, Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O
Hawai’i Nei, and the Office of Hawaiian
Affairs.
On August 29, 2003, Hui Malama I Na
Kupuna O Hawai’i Nei filed a claim
with the Bishop Museum to repatriate
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the small wooden image and cowrie
shell.
On October 21, 2003, Hui Malama I
Na Kupuna O Hawai’i Nei asked the
Bishop Museum to explain why a rock
oyster shell pendant that had also been
previously listed as an unassociated
funerary object on the museum’s
Moloka’i inventory had not been
included in the May 2, 2003 notice.
On November 8, 2004, Hui Malama I
Na Kupuna O Hawai’i Nei requested the
assistance of the Review Committee in
resolving its dispute with the Bishop
Museum. The request also included an
allegation that the Bishop Museum
failed to comply with the repatriation
provisions of the Act.
On December 17, 2004, the Review
Committee’s designated Federal officer
acknowledged receipt of the November
8, 2004, request and identified questions
as to whether the rock oyster shell
pendant was an unassociated funerary
object or whether the museum had right
of possession to the three items as issues
of fact with which the Review
Committee might wish to assist in
resolving. The same day, the allegation
of failure to comply was referred to the
Director, National Park Service for
investigation.
On February 2, 2005, the Bishop
Museum notified the Review Committee
that the museum intended to publish a
Notice of Intent to Repatriate identifying
the rock oyster pendant as an
unassociated funerary object. The
museum also notified the Review
Committee that it did not intend to
assert right of possession to either the
cowrie shell or the rock oyster pendant.
The museum did assert a right of
possession to the carved wooden figure.
On February 18, 2005, the Review
Committee’s designated Federal officer
notified Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O
Hawai’i Nei and the Bishop Museum
that the Review Committee had agreed
to assist in the resolution of the dispute
at its next meeting.
On March 1, 2005, the Review
Committee’s designated Federal officer
sent letters to two claimants inviting
them to provide information to the
Review Committee: Royal Hawaiian
Academy of Traditional Arts and Na Lei
Ali’i Kawananakoa.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
On March 13–15, 2005, the Review
Committee considered the dispute as
presented by representatives of Hui
Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai’i Nei,
Bishop Museum, Office of Hawaiian
Affairs, Royal Hawaiian Academy of
Traditional Arts, and Na Lei Ali’i
Kawananakoa and made the following
findings:
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 104 (Wednesday, June 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31513-31514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-10809]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review
Committee Findings and Recommendations Regarding a Dispute Between Hui
Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai'i Nei and the Bishop Museum
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: At a March 13-15, 2005, public meeting in Honolulu, HI, the
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee
(Review Committee) considered a dispute between Hui Malama I Na Kupuna
O Hawai'i Nei and the Bishop Museum. The dispute focused on the
disposition of carved sandstone blocks from the Island of Moloka'i
known as Kalaina Wawae that are under the control of the Bishop Museum.
The Review Committee recommended that the Bishop Museum and Hui Malama
o Mo'omomi work together to revise expeditiously the current memorandum
of agreement to require the consent of Hui Malama o Mo'omomi prior to
the removal of the Kalaina Wawae from the Island of Molokai.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 9, 1999, the Bishop Museum
published a Notice of Intent to Repatriate in the Federal Register. The
notice identified three sandstone blocks containing carved footprints,
also known as Kalaina Wawae, as objects of cultural patrimony
culturally affiliated with Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai'i Nei.
On March 4, 2003, the Bishop Museum and Hui Malama O Mo'omomi
signed a memorandum of agreement to place the Kalaina Wawae at
Mo'omomi, Island of Moloka'i. Hand written at the bottom of the
memorandum of agreement is the following: ``Signed under protest
because Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai'i Nei was removed from this
agreement without explanation by Bishop Museum to any of the parties.
This act demonstrates a lack of respect on the part of the museum.''
The Kalaina Wawae were moved to Mo'omomi on the Island of Moloka'i.
On November 3, 2003, the Bishop Museum published a correction in
the Federal Register rescinding the April 9, 1999, notice. The
correction states that the Bishop Museum does not intend to repatriate
the Kalaina Wawae to the Native Hawaiian organizations that previously
presented claims.
On November 29, 2004, Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai'i Nei
requested
[[Page 31514]]
the assistance of the Review Committee in resolving its dispute with
the Bishop Museum as to whether repatriation of the Kalaina Wawae to
Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai'i Nei was complete when no competing
claims were filed following publication of the April 9, 1999, Federal
Register notice.
On December 17, 2004, the Review Committee's designated Federal
officer acknowledged receipt of the November 29, 2004, request and
identified questions as to whether the Kalaina Wawae are objects of
cultural patrimony as an issue of fact with which the Review Committee
might wish to assist in resolving. The request for a recommendation
regarding the finality of repatriation, which is likely dependent on
provisions of state law and other legal authorities, was identified as
being beyond the Review Committee's purview.
On February 2, 2005, the Bishop Museum provided information to the
Review Committee relevant to the dispute, including a declaration that
the museum does not consider the Kalaina Wawae to be objects of
cultural patrimony.
On February 21, 2005, the Review Committee's designated Federal
officer notified Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai'i Nei and the Bishop
Museum that the Review Committee had agreed to assist in the resolution
of the dispute at its next meeting.
On March 1, 2005, the Review Committee's designated Federal officer
invited a representative of Hui Malama O Mo'omomi to provide
information to the Review Committee.
Findings and Recommendations: On March 13-15, 2005, the Review
Committee considered the dispute as presented by representatives of Hui
Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai'i Nei, Bishop Museum, and Hui Malama o
Mo'omomi and made the following findings:
1. There is disagreement regarding whether the Kalaina Wawae are
objects of cultural patrimony.
2. The Review Committee has chosen not to come to a finding as to
whether the Kalaina Wawae are objects of cultural patrimony at this
time.
3. The Review Committee recognizes the cultural significance of the
Kalaina Wawae to the people of the Island of Molokai.
4. The Review Committee believes that the current location of the
Kalaina Wawae is appropriate.
The Review Committee recommends that the Bishop Museum and Hui
Malama o Mo'omomi work together to revise expeditiously the current
memorandum of agreement to require the consent of Hui Malama o Mo'omomi
prior to the removal of the Kalaina Wawae from the Island of Molokai.
The National Park Service publishes this notice as part of its
administrative and staff support for the Review Committee. The findings
and recommendations are those of the Review Committee and do not
necessarily represent the views of the Secretary of the Interior.
Neither the Secretary of the Interior nor the National Park Service has
taken a position on these matters.
Dated: May 20, 2005.
Rosita Worl,
Chair, Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review
Committee.
[FR Doc. 05-10809 Filed 5-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-50-S
