International Standard-Setting Activities, 30675-30690 [05-10636]
Download as PDF
30675
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 102
Friday, May 27, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
[Docket No. 05–003N]
International Standard-Setting
Activities
Food Safety and Inspection
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice informs the public
of the sanitary and phytosanitary
standard-setting activities of the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), in
accordance with section 491 of the
Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended, and the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act, Public Law 103–465,
108 Stat. 4809. This notice also provides
a list of other standard-setting activities
of Codex, including commodity
standards, guidelines, codes of practice,
and revised texts. This notice, which
covers the time periods from June 1,
2004, to May 31, 2005, and June 1, 2005,
to May 31, 2006, seeks comments on
standards currently under consideration
and recommendations for new
standards.
Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Mail, including floppy disks or CDROM’s, and hand-or courier-delivered
items: Send to Docket Clerk, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Food Safety
and Inspection Service, 300 12th Street,
SW., Room 102 Cotton Annex,
Washington, DC 20250.
All submissions received must
include the Agency name and docket
number 05–003N. Please state that your
comments refer to Codex and, if your
comments relate to specific Codex
committees, please identify those
committees in your comments and
submit a copy of your comments to the
delegate from that particular committee.
All comments submitted will be
ADDRESSES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
available for public inspection in the
FSIS Docket Room at the address listed
above between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday. The comments
also will be posted on the Agency’s Web
site at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
regulations/2005_notices_index/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: F.
Edward Scarbrough, Ph.D., United
States Manager for Codex, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Office of the
Under Secretary for Food Safety, Room
4861, South Agriculture Building, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–3700; (202) 205–
7760. For information pertaining to
particular committees, the delegate of
that committee may be contacted. (A
complete list of U.S. delegates and
alternate delegates can be found in
Attachment 2 to this notice.) Documents
pertaining to Codex are accessible via
the World Wide Web at the following
address: https://
www.codexalimentarius.net/
current.asp. The U.S. Codex Office also
maintains a Web site at https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/
Regulations_&_Policies/Codex_Alime
ntarius/index.asp.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The World Trade Organization (WTO)
was established on January 1, 1995, as
the common international institutional
framework for the conduct of trade
relations among its members in matters
related to the Uruguay Round Trade
Agreements. The WTO is the successor
organization to the General Agreement
on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). U.S.
membership in the WTO was approved
and the Uruguay Round Agreements Act
was signed into law by the President on
December 8, 1994. The Uruguay Round
Agreements became effective, with
respect to the United States, on January
1, 1995. Pursuant to section 491 of the
Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended, the President is required to
designate an agency to be responsible
for informing the public of the sanitary
and phytosanitary (SPS) standardsetting activities of each international
standard-setting organization, Codex,
World Organization for Animal Health,
and the International Plant Protection
Convention. The President, pursuant to
Proclamation No. 6780 of March 23,
1995 (60 FR 15845), designated the U.S.
Department of Agriculture as the agency
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
responsible for informing the public of
SPS standard-setting activities of each
international standard-setting
organization. The Secretary of
Agriculture has delegated to the
Administrator, Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS), the
responsibility to inform the public of
the SPS standard-setting activities of
Codex. The FSIS Administrator has, in
turn, assigned the responsibility for
informing the public of the SPS
standard-setting activities of Codex to
the U.S. Codex Office, FSIS.
Codex was created in 1962 by two
U.N. organizations, the Food and
Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the
World Health Organization (WHO).
Codex is the principal international
organization for encouraging fair
international trade in food and
protecting the health and economic
interests of consumers. Through
adoption of food standards, codes of
practice, and other guidelines
developed by its committees and by
promoting their adoption and
implementation by governments, Codex
seeks to ensure that the world’s food
supply is sound, wholesome, free from
adulteration, and correctly labeled. In
the United States, the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA); the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS); and the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) manage and
carry out U.S. Codex activities.
As the agency responsible for
informing the public of the SPS
standard-setting activities of Codex,
FSIS publishes this notice in the
Federal Register annually. Attachment
1 (Sanitary and Phytosanitary Activities
of Codex) sets forth the following
information:
1. The SPS standards under
consideration or planned for
consideration; and
2. For each SPS standard specified:
a. A description of the consideration
or planned consideration of the
standard;
b. Whether the United States is
participating or plans to participate in
the consideration of the standard;
c. The agenda for United States
participation, if any; and
d. The agency responsible for
representing the United States with
respect to the standard.
To obtain Copies of those Standards
listed in Attachment 1 that are under
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
30676
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 / Notices
consideration by Codex, please contact
the Codex delegate or the U.S. Codex
Office. This notice also solicits public
comment on those standards that are
currently under consideration or
planned for consideration and
recommendations for new standards.
The delegate, in conjunction with the
responsible agency, will take the
comments received into account in
participating in the consideration of the
standards and in proposing matters to
be considered by Codex.
The United States’ delegate will
facilitate public participation in the
United States Government’s activities
relating to Codex Alimentarius. The
United States’ delegate will maintain a
list of individuals, groups, and
organizations that have expressed an
interest in the activities of the Codex
committees and will disseminate
information regarding United States’
delegation activities to interested
parties. This information will include
the current status of each agenda item;
the United States Government’s position
or preliminary position on the agenda
items; and the time and place of
planning meetings and debriefing
meetings following Codex committee
sessions. In addition, the U.S. Codex
Office makes much of the same
information available through its web
page, https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
Regulations_&_Policies/Codex_Alime
ntarius/index.asp. Please visit the web
page or notify the appropriate U.S.
delegate or the Office of U.S. Codex
Alimentarius, Room 4861, South
Agriculture Building, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–3700, if you
would like to access or receive
information about specific committees.
The information provided in
Attachment 1 describes the status of
Codex standard-setting activities by the
Codex Committees for the time periods
from June 1, 2004 to May 31, 2005, and
June 1, 2005 to May 31, 2006. In
addition, the following attachments are
included:
Attachment 2 List of U.S. Codex
Officials (includes U.S. delegates and
alternate delegates)
Attachment 3 Timetable of Codex
Sessions (June 2004 through June
2006)
Attachment 4 Definitions for the
Purpose of Codex Alimentarius
Attachment 5 Part 1—Uniform
Procedure for the Elaboration of
Codex Standards and Related Texts
Part 2—Uniform Accelerated Procedure
for the Elaboration of Codex
Standards and Related Texts
Attachment 6 Nature of Codex
Standards
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
Additional Public Notification
Public awareness of all segments of
rulemaking and policy development is
important. Consequently, in an effort to
ensure that the public and in particular
minorities, women, and persons with
disabilities, are aware of this notice,
FSIS will announce it on-line through
the FSIS web page located at https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/regulations/
2005_Notices_Index/.
FSIS also will make copies of this
Federal Register publication available
through the FSIS Constituent Update,
which is used to provide information
regarding FSIS policies, procedures,
regulations, Federal Register notices,
FSIS public meetings, recalls, and other
types of information that could affect or
would be of interest to our constituents
and stakeholders. The update is
communicated via Listserv, a free e-mail
subscription service consisting of
industry, trade, and farm groups,
consumer interest groups, allied health
professionals, scientific professionals,
and other individuals who have
requested to be included. The update
also is available on the FSIS web page.
Through Listserv and the Web page,
FSIS is able to provide information to a
much broader, more diverse audience.
In addition, FSIS offers an e-mail
subscription service which provides an
automatic and customized notification
when popular pages are updated,
including Federal Register publications
and related documents. This service is
available at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
news_and_events/email_subscription/
and allows FSIS customers to sign up
for subscription options across eight
categories. Options range from recalls to
export information to regulations,
directives and notices. Customers can
add or delete subscriptions themselves
and have the option to password protect
their account.
Done at Washington, DC on May 24, 2005.
F. Edward Scarbrough,
United States Manager for Codex.
Attachment 1: Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Activities of Codex
Codex Alimentarius Commission and
Executive Committee
The Codex Alimentarius Commission
will hold its Twenty-Eighth Session July
4–9, 2005 in Rome, Italy. At that time
it will consider procedural matters, and
the standards, codes of practice, and
related matters brought to its attention
by the general subject committees,
commodity committees, ad hoc Task
Forces and member delegations. It will
also consider options to implement
recommendations from the review of
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Codex committee structure and
mandates of Codex committees and task
forces, as well as budgetary and strategic
planning issues. At this Session, the
Commission will elect a Chair and three
Vice Chairs. The issue of Codex
interaction with other international
organizations will be discussed.
Prior to the Commission meeting, the
Executive Committee will have met at
its Fifty-fifth Session on February 9–11,
2005 and its Fifty-sixth Session on June
30–July 2, 2005. It is composed of the
chairperson, vice-chairpersons, seven
members elected from the Commission,
one from each of the following
geographic regions: Africa, Asia,
Europe, Latin America and the
Caribbean, Near East, North America,
and South-West Pacific. In addition,
regional coordinators from the six
regional committees attend as observers.
It will consider the Codex Strategic Plan
2008–1013; review the Codex committee
structure and mandate of Codex
committees and task forces; review
matters arising from reports of Codex
Committees, proposals for new work,
and standards management issues;
consider the implementation of the Joint
FAO/WHO Evaluation of the Codex
Alimentarius and other FAO and WHO
Work on Food Standards; and review
the Trust Fund for the Participation of
Developing Countries and Countries in
Transition in the Work of the Codex
Alimentarius.
Responsible Agency: USDA/FSIS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Residues of
Veterinary Drugs in Foods
The Codex Committee on Residues of
Veterinary Drugs in Foods determines
priorities for the consideration of
residues of veterinary drugs in foods
and recommends Maximum Residue
Limits (MRLs) for veterinary drugs. A
veterinary drug is defined as any
substance applied or administered to a
food producing animal, such as meat or
dairy animals, poultry, fish or bees, for
therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic
purposes or for modification of
physiological functions or behavior.
A Codex Maximum Limit for
Veterinary Drugs (MRLVD) is the
maximum concentration of residue
resulting from the use of a veterinary
drug (expressed in mg/kg or ug/kg on a
fresh weight basis) that is adopted by
the Codex Alimentarius Commission to
be permitted or recognized as acceptable
in or on a food. An MRLVD is based on
the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) and
indicates the amount of residue in food
that is considered to be without
appreciable toxicological hazard. An
MRLVD also takes into account other
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 / Notices
relevant public health risks as well as
food technological aspects. When
establishing an MRLVD, consideration
is also given to residues that occur in
food of plant origin and/or the
environment. Furthermore, the MRLVD
may be reduced to be consistent with
good practices in the use of veterinary
drugs and to the extent that practical
analytical methods are available.
Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI): An
estimate by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert
Committee on Food Additives (JECFA)
of the amount of a veterinary drug,
expressed on a body weight basis, that
can be ingested daily over a lifetime
without appreciable health risk
(standard man = 60 kg).
The committee met in Arlington, VA
(USA), October 25–28, 2004. The
following will be under consideration
by the Commission at its 28th Session
in July 2005. The relevant document is
ALINORM 5/28/31.
Draft MRLs at Step 8:
• Cyhalothrin.
• Flumequine.
• Neomycin.
• Dicyclanil.
Proposed Draft MRLs at Step 5/8:
• Imidocarb.
Proposed Draft Code of Practice to
Minimize and Contain Antimicrobial
Resistance at Step 5/8.
Proposed Draft MRLs at Step 5:
• Flumequine (in black tiger shrimp).
• Pirlimycin.
• Cypermethrin and alphacypermethrin.
• Doramectin (in cow’s milk).
The Committee continues to work on:
• Draft MRLs for Trichlorfon
(metrifonate) at step 7.
• Proposed Draft MRLs for
Ractopamine at step 4.
• Proposed Draft Revised Guidelines
for the Establishment of a Regulatory
Program for Control of Veterinary Drug
Residues in Foods.
• Discussion paper on Risk
Management Methodologies, including
Risk Assessment Policies in the Codex
Committee on Residues of Veterinary
Drugs in Foods.
• Proposed Draft Revised Part I, II, III
of Guidelines for the Establishment of a
Regulatory Program for the Control of
Veterinary Drug Residues in Foods.
• Priority List of Veterinary Drugs
Requiring Evaluation or Reevaluation.
• List of Methods of Analysis for
Veterinary Drug Residues and
Identification of Routine Methods of
Analysis.
• Recommendations on Residues of
Veterinary Drugs without ADI/MRL
(Prioritization of work).
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA;
USDA/FSIS.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Food Additives
and Contaminants
The Codex Committee on Food
Additives and Contaminants (CCFAC)
(a) establishes or endorses permitted
maximum or guideline levels for
individual food additives,
contaminants, and naturally occurring
toxicants in food and animal feed; (b)
prepares priority lists of food additives
and contaminants for toxicological
evaluation by the Joint FAO/WHO
Expert Committee on Food Additives
(JECFA); (c) recommends specifications
of identity and purity for food additives
for adoption by the Commission; (d)
considers methods of analysis for food
additives and contaminants; and (e)
considers and elaborates standards and
codes for related subjects such as
labeling of food additives when sold as
such and food irradiation. The
committee met in The Hague, The
Netherlands, April 25–29, 2005. The
following matters are under
consideration by the Commission at its
28th Session in July 2005. The relevant
document is ALINORM 5/28/12.
• Revised Terms of Reference of the
Codex Committee on Food Additives
and Contaminants.
• Terms of Reference for the FAO/
WHO Joint Expert Consultation to
Conduct a Comprehensive Assessment
of Use of Active Chlorine.
Food Additives
To be considered at Step 8:
• General Standard for Food Additive
(GSFA): Draft Food Additive Provisions
in Tables 1 and 2.
• Amendment to Annex B (Food
Category System) of the GSFA (coconut
water).
To be considered at Step 5/8:
• General Standard for Food
Additives: Proposed Draft Food
Additive Provisions in Tables 1, 2 and
3.
• Advisory Specifications for the
Identity and Purity of Food Additives.
• Proposed Draft Revisions to the
Codex International Numbering System
for Food Additives.
To be considered at Step 5:
• Proposed Draft Revised Preamble to
the GSFA, including diagram.
To be considered for Revocation and
Discontinuation of work:
• General Principles for the Use of
Food Additives.
• Proposed Amendments to the
Codex Procedural Manual related to the
revocation of the General Principles for
the Use of Food Additives.
• Proposed Draft and Draft Food
Additive Provisions in the GSFA.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30677
To be considered for New Work:
• Revision of Class Names and the
International Numbering System for
Food Additives.
The Committee is continuing work
on:
• General Standard for Food
Additives: Draft Food Additive
Provisions (in Tables 1, 2 and 3).
• General Standard for Food
Additives: Revisions to the Preamble to
clarify relationship between the General
Standard and commodity standards.
• International Numbering System.
• Specifications for the Identity and
Purity of Food Additives.
• Inventory of Processing Aids.
• Discussion Paper on Flavoring
Agents.
Contaminants
To be considered at Step 8:
• Draft Code of Practice for the
Prevention and Reduction of Aflatoxin
Contamination in Tree Nuts.
• Draft Code of Practice for the
Prevention and Reduction of Inorganic
Tin Contamination in Canned Foods.
• Draft Maximum Levels for
Cadmium in wheat grain, potato, stem
and root vegetables, leafy vegetables,
and other vegetables.
To be considered at Step 5/8:
• Proposed Amendment to the
Preamble of the Codex General Standard
for Contaminants and Toxins in Foods
(GSCTF).
To be considered at Step 5:
• Proposed Draft Maximum Level for
Aflatoxin in unprocessed almonds,
hazelnuts and pistachios.
• Proposed Draft Maximum Levels for
Cadmium in rice, cephalopod
(excluding viscera), and marine bivalve
mollusks (excluding oysters and
scallops).
To be considered for Revocation:
• List of Maximum Levels for
Contaminants and Toxins Contained in
Codex Commodity Standards and
Relevant Standards and Texts.
To be considered for New Work:
• Appendix to the Code of Practice
for the Prevention and Reduction of
Aflatoxin Contamination in Tree Nuts to
address additional measures for the
prevention and reduction of aflatoxins
in Brazil nuts.
The Committee is continuing work
on:
• Maximum levels for aflatoxin in
processed almonds, hazelnuts, and
pistachios.
• Discussion Paper on Aflatoxin
Contamination in Brazil Nuts.
• Proposed draft sampling plan for
Aflatoxin contamination in Almonds,
Brazil nuts, Hazelnuts and Pistachios.
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
30678
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 / Notices
• Discussion paper on
Deoxynivalenol (DON) Contamination
in Cereals.
• Maximum Level for lead in fish.
• Proposed Draft Code of Practice for
Source Directed Measures to Reduce
Dioxin and Dioxin-like PCB
Contamination in Foods.
• Discussion paper with proposals for
maximum levels for 3monochloropropanediol in acidhydrolyzed vegetable protein (acidHVP) and acid-HVP containing foods.
• Discussion paper on acrylamide,
including a project paper for new work
and an outline of a proposed draft code
of practice.
• Draft Revised Guideline Levels for
Radionuclides in Foods Following
Accidental Nuclear Contamination for
Use in International Trade, Including
Guideline Levels for Long-Term Use.
• Discussion paper on polyaromatic
hydrocarbons, including a project paper
for new work and an outline of a
proposed draft code of practice.
• Discussion paper on methylmercury
in fish.
• Discussion paper on Code of
Practice for the Prevention and
Reduction of Ochratoxin A (OTA)
Contamination in Coffee and Cocoa.
• Discussion paper on Maximum
level of Ochratoxin A in Wine.
General Issues
• Priority List of Food Additives,
Contaminants and Naturally Occurring
Toxicants Proposed for Evaluation by
JECFA.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues
The Codex Committee on Pesticide
Residues recommends to the Codex
Alimentarius Commission
establishment of maximum limits for
pesticide residues for specific food
items or in groups of food. A Codex
Maximum Residue Limit for Pesticide
(MRLP) is the maximum concentration
of a pesticide residue (expressed as mg/
kg), recommended by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission to be legally
permitted in or on food commodities
and animal feeds. Foods derived from
commodities that comply with the
respective MRLPs are intended to be
toxicologically acceptable, that is,
consideration of the various dietary
residue intake estimates and
determinations both at the national and
international level in comparison with
the ADI,* should indicate that foods
complying with Codex MRLPs are safe
for human consumption.
Codex MRLPs are primarily intended
to apply in international trade and are
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
derived from reviews conducted by the
Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues
(JMPR) following:
(a) Review of residue data from
supervised trials and supervised uses
including those reflecting national good
agricultural practices (GAP). Data from
supervised trials conducted at the
highest nationally recommended,
authorized, or registered uses are
included in the review. In order to
accommodate variations in national pest
control requirements, Codex MRLPs
take into account the higher levels
shown to arise in such supervised trials,
which are considered to represent
effective pest control practices, and
(b) Toxicological assessment of the
pesticide and its residue.
The committee met in The Hague, The
Netherlands, April 18–23, 2005. The
following items will be considered by
the Commission at its 28th Session in
July 2005. The relevant document is
ALINORM 05/28/24.
To be considered at Step 8:
• Draft and Draft Revised Maximum
Residue Limits.
To be considered at Step 8(I):
Bifenazate.
Fludioxonil.
Trifloxystrobin.
To be considered at Step 5/8:
• Proposed Draft and Proposed Draft
Revised Maximum Residue Limits
including Proposed Draft MRLs for
Spices.
• Proposed Draft Guidelines for the
Use of Mass Spectrometry (MS) for
Identification, Confirmation and
Quantitative Determination of Residues.
• Proposed New Food Classification
Codes for Commodities with Adopted
MRLs.
To be considered at Step 5:
• Proposed Draft and Proposed Draft
Revised Maximum Residue Limits
including Proposed Draft MRLs for
Dried Chili Peppers.
• Proposed Draft Guidelines on
Estimation of Uncertainty of Results.
• Proposed Draft Risk Analysis
Principles Applied by the Codex
Committee on Pesticide Residues.
To be considered for Revocation:
• Codex CLX–Ds.
The committee is continuing work on:
• Pilot Project for the examination of
national MRLs as Interim Codex MRLs
for safer replacement pesticides.
• Revision of the List of
Recommended Methods of Analysis for
Pesticide Residues.
• Criteria for Prioritization Process to
Recommend Compounds for Evaluation
by JMPR.
• Revision of the Codex Priority List
of Pesticides for review by JMPR.
• MRLs for Processed or Ready-to-Eat
Foods.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
*Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of a
chemical is the daily intake which, during an
entire lifetime, appears to be without
appreciable risk to the health of the
consumer on the basis of all the known facts
at the time of the evaluation of the chemical
by the Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide
Residues. It is expressed in milligrams of the
chemical per kilogram of body weight.
Responsible Agency: EPA, USDA/
AMS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Methods of
Analysis and Sampling
The Codex Committee on Methods of
Analysis and Sampling:
(a) Defines the criteria appropriate to
Codex Methods of Analysis and
Sampling;
(b) Serves as a coordinating body for
Codex with other international groups
working in methods of analysis and
sampling and quality assurance systems
for laboratories;
(c) Specifies, on the basis of final
recommendations submitted to it by the
other bodies referred to in (b) above,
Reference Methods of Analysis and
Sampling appropriate to Codex
Standards which are generally
applicable to a number of foods;
(d) Considers, amends, if necessary,
and endorses, as appropriate, methods
of analysis and sampling proposed by
Codex (Commodity) Committees, except
that methods of analysis and sampling
for residues of pesticides or veterinary
drugs in food, the assessment of
microbiological quality and safety in
food, and the assessment of
specifications for food additives do not
fall within the terms of reference of this
Committee;
(e) Elaborates sampling plans and
procedures, as may be required;
(f) Considers specific sampling and
analysis problems submitted to it by the
Commission or any of its Committees;
and
(g) Defines procedures, protocols,
guidelines or related texts for the
assessment of food laboratory
proficiency, as well as quality assurance
systems for laboratories.
The 26th Session of the Committee
met in Budapest, Hungary, on April 4–
8, 2005. The relevant document is
ALINORM 05/28/23. The following will
be considered by the Commission at its
28th Session in July 2005.
To be considered at Step 5:
• Proposed Draft Guidelines for
Evaluating Acceptable Methods of
Analysis.
The Committee will continue work
on:
• Criteria for Evaluating Acceptable
Methods of Analysis.
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 / Notices
• Proposed Draft Guidelines for
Settling of Disputes on Analytical (test)
Results.
• Consideration of the Fitness-ForPurpose Approach to Evaluating
Methods of Analysis.
• Further Review of the Analytical
Terminology for Codex Use in the
Procedural Manual.
• Endorsement of Methods of
Analysis and Sampling Provisions in
Codex Standards.
• Criteria for Methods of Analysis for
the Detection and Identification of
Foods derived from Biotechnology
• Methods of Analysis for the
determination of dioxins and PCBs.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA;
USDA/MRP.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
(b) Details on the process of
determining equivalence.
(c) Documentation for evaluation of
submissions of requests for equivalence
determinations.
• Proposed Draft Guidelines for Riskbased Inspection of Imported Foods.
New work:
• Develop principles for product
tracing/traceability within the context of
food inspection and certification
systems.
• Revise the Codex Guidelines for
Generic Official Certificate Formats and
the Production and Issuance of
Certification.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA;
USDA/FSIS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Food Import and
Export Inspection and Certification
Systems
The Codex Committee on Food Import
and Export Inspection and Certification
Systems is charged with developing
principles and guidelines for food
import and export inspection and
certification systems to protect
consumers and to facilitate trade.
Additionally, the Committee develops
principles and guidelines for the
application of measures by competent
authorities to provide assurance that
foods comply with essential
requirements, especially statutory
health requirements. This encompasses
work on: Equivalence of food inspection
systems including equivalence
agreements, processes and procedures to
ensure that sanitary measures are
implemented; guidelines on food import
control systems; and guidelines on food
product certification and information
exchange. The development of
guidelines for the appropriate
utilization of quality assurance systems
to ensure that foodstuffs conform to
requirements and to facilitate trade also
are included in the Committee’s terms
of reference. The reference document is
ALINORM 05/28/30. The committee
met in Melbourne, Australia, on
December 6–10, 2004. The following
will be considered for adoption by the
Commission at its 28thSession in July
2005.
To be considered at step 5/8:
• Draft Principles for Electronic
Certification.
The committee is continuing work on:
• Proposed Draft Appendices to the
Guidelines on the Judgment of
Equivalence of Sanitary Measures
Associated with Food Inspection and
Certification.
(a) Determining an ‘‘objective basis of
comparison’’
The Codex Committee on General
Principles deals with procedure and
general matters as are referred to it by
the Codex Alimentarius Commission.
The 21st Session addressed issues
related to decisions made by the
Commission regarding the FAO/WHO
Codex Evaluation. The 22nd Session
which met on April 11–15, 2005 in
Paris, France, considered the regular
work of the Committee. The relevant
documents are ALINORM 05/28/33 and
ALINORM 05/28/33A. Matters to be
considered for adoption by the 28th
Commission in July 2005:
To be considered at Step 8:
• Draft Risk Analysis Principles
Applied by the Committee on Food
Additives and Contaminants (CCFAC).
• Draft CCFAC Policy for Exposure
Assessment.
For consideration by the Commission:
Amendments to the Rules of
Procedure:
• Proposed amendments concerning
the enlargement of the Executive
Committee, the functions of the
Executive Committee and matters
related to budget and expenses.
• Proposed Amendments to Rule
VIII.5—Observers.
• Proposed Amendment on the Right
to Address the Chair.
Amendments to the Procedure
Manual:
• Draft Revised Criteria for the
Establishment of Work Priorities.
• Draft Guidelines on Physical
Working Groups.
• Draft Guidelines on Electronic
Working Groups.
• Draft Revised Principles concerning
the Participation of International NonGovernmental Organizations in the
Work of the Codex Alimentarius
Commission.
• Proposed Amendments to the
Procedural Manual to eliminate the
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
Codex Committee on General Principles
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30679
acceptance procedures for Codex
Standards.
• Draft Guidelines for Cooperation
with International Intergovernmental
Organizations.
The Committee continued work on:
• Proposed Draft Working Principles
for Risk Analysis for Food Safety
(Guidance to National Governments).
• Proposed amendments to the Rules
of Procedure: Duration of the terms of
the Members of the Executive
Committee.
• Possible reorganization of the
structure, content and presentation of
the Procedural Manual.
• Changes in the Elaboration
Procedures.
• Clarification of the term ‘‘interim’’
as used for the adoption of Codex
standards at Step 8.
• Possible definitions of ‘‘sciencebased’’ and ‘‘risk-based’’.
• Management of the work in the
Codex Committee on Food Hygiene.
Responsible Agency: USDA/FSIS,
FDA/CFSAN.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Food Labelling
The Codex Committee on Food
Labelling is responsible for drafting
provisions on labelling issues assigned
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission.
The reference document is ALINORM
04/27/22. The Committee held its
Thirty-third Session in Kota Kinabalu,
Malaysia, on May 9–13, 2005. It
considered the following items:
• Guidelines for the Production,
Processing, Labelling and Marketing of
Organically Produced Foods Proposed
Revised Sections: Annex 2—Tables 3
and 4, Revision to Table 1 (Natural
Sodium Nitrate).
• Draft Amendment to the General
Standard for the Labelling of
Prepackaged Foods—(Draft
Recommendations for the Labelling of
Foods Obtained through Certain
Techniques of Genetic Modification/
Genetic Engineering) Section 2.
(Definitions).
• Proposed Draft Guidelines for the
Labelling of Food and food Ingredients
obtained through certain Techniques of
Genetic Modification/Genetic
Engineering: Labelling Provisions.
• Proposed Draft Amendment to the
General Standard for the Labelling of
Prepackaged Foods: Quantitative
Declaration of Ingredients.
• Country of Origin Labelling.
• Discussion paper on Advertising.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA;
USDA/FSIS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
30680
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 / Notices
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Food Hygiene
The Codex Committee on Food
Hygiene has four primary
responsibilities. First, to draft basic
provisions on food hygiene applicable
to all food. These provisions normally
take the form of Codes of Hygienic
Practice for a specific commodity (e.g.
bottled water) or group of commodities
(e.g., milk and milk products). Second,
to suggest and prioritize areas where
there is a need for microbiological risk
assessment at the international level and
to consider microbiological risk
management matters in relation to food
hygiene and in relation to the risk
assessment activities of FAO and WHO.
Third, to consider, amend if necessary,
and endorse food hygiene provisions
that are incorporated into specific
Codex commodity standards by the
Codex commodity committees. Fourth,
to provide such other general guidance
to the Commission on matters relating to
food hygiene as may be necessary. The
following items will be considered by
the Codex Alimentarius Commission at
its 28th Session in Rome, Italy, July 4–
9, 2005. The relevant document is
ALINORM 05/28/13.
To be considered at Step 5:
• Proposed Draft Guidelines on the
Application of the General Principles of
Food Hygiene to the Control of Listeria
monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Foods.
• Proposed Draft Code of Hygienic
Practice for Eggs and Egg Products.
• Proposed Draft Principles and
Guidelines for the Conduct of
Microbiological Risk Management.
The committee continues to work on:
• Proposed Draft Guidelines for
Validation of Food Hygienic Control
Measures.
• Proposed Draft Code of Hygienic
Practice for Powdered Formulae for
Infants and Children.
• Endorsement of Hygiene Provisions
in Codex Standards and Codes of
Practice.
• Annexes to the step 5 documents.
• Proposals/risk profiles:
• Guidelines for the Application of
the General Principles of Food Hygiene
to the Risk-Based Control of
Enterohemorrhagic E. coli in Ground
Beef and Fermented Sausages.
• Guidelines for the Application of
the General Principles of Food Hygiene
to the Risk-Based Control of Salmonella
spp. in Broiler Chickens.
• Guidelines for Risk Management
Options for Campylobacter in Broiler
Chickens.
• Vibrio spp. in Seafood.
• Viruses in Food.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA; FSIS/
USDA.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
Codex Committee on Fresh Fruits and
Vegetables
The Codex Committee on Fresh Fruits
and Vegetables is responsible for
elaborating world-wide standards and
codes of practice for fresh fruits and
vegetables. The Committee met in
Mexico City, Mexico, on May 16–20,
2005. At the session they discussed the
following items:
• Draft Standard for Tomatoes at Step
7.
• Draft Standard for Table Grapes
retained at Step 7.
• Proposed Draft Standard for
Rambutan at Step 3.
• Proposed Draft Standard for Apples
at Step 3.
• Section 2.1.1 (Maturity
Requirements) and Annex on Smallberry Varieties (Section 3.1) (draft
Codex Standard for Table Grapes).
• Guidelines for the Quality Control
of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables.
• Standard Layout for Codex
Standards for Fresh Fruits and
Vegetables.
• Priority List.
Responsible Agency: USDA/AMS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Nutrition and
Foods for Special Dietary Uses
The Codex Committee on Nutrition
and Foods for Special Dietary Uses
(CCNFSDU) is responsible for studying
nutritional problems referred by the
Codex Alimentarius Commission. The
Committee also drafts general
provisions, as appropriate, on
nutritional aspects of all foods and
develops standards, guidelines, or
related texts for foods for special dietary
uses. The committee met in Bonn,
Germany, November 1–4, 2004. The
relevant document is ALINORM 05/28/
26. The following items will be
considered by the 28th Session of the
Commission in June 2005.
To be adopted at Step 8:
• Draft Guidelines for Vitamin and
Mineral Food Supplements.
The Committee continues work on:
• Draft Revised Standard for GlutenFree Foods at Step 7.
• Draft Revised Standard for
Processed Cereal-Based.Foods for
Infants and Young Children at Step 6.
• Draft Revised Standard for Infant
Formula and Formulas for Special
Medical Purposes Intended for Infants at
Steps 3 (Section A) and 6 (Section B).
• Guidelines for Use of Nutrition
Claims Draft Table of Conditions for
Nutrient Content Claims (Part B
containing Provisions on Dietary Fibre)
at Step 6.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Proposed Draft Revision of the
Advisory Lists of Nutrient Compounds
for Use in Foods for Special Dietary
Uses Intended for Use by Infants and
Young Children.
• Proposed Draft Recommendations
on the Scientific Basis of Health Claims.
• Discussion Paper on the
Application of Risk Analysis to the
Work of the CCNFSDU.
• Discussion Paper on Proposals for
Additional or Revised Nutrient
Reference Values (NRVs).
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA; FNS/
USDA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery
Products
The Fish and Fishery Products
Committee is responsible for elaborating
standards for fresh, frozen and
otherwise processed fish, crustaceans
and mollusks. The committee met in
Capetown, South Africa, February 28–
March 4, 2005. The following will be
considered by the 28th Session of the
Commission when it meets in July 2005.
The relevant document is ALINORM 05/
28/18.
To be considered at Step 8:
• Draft Code of Practice for Fish and
Fishery Products (Aquaculture).
• Draft Amendment to the Standard
for Salted Fish and Dried Salted Fish.
To be considered at Step 5/8:
• Proposed Draft Code of Practice for
Fish and Fishery Products (Shrimps and
Prawns; Cephalopods; Transport; Retail;
and relevant Definitions).
To be considered at Step 5:
• Proposed Draft Standard for
Sturgeon Caviar New work:
• Revision of the Procedure for the
Inclusion of Species.
• Amendment of the Standard for
Canned Sardines and Sardine-Type
Products.
The Committee continues work on the
following:
• Proposed Draft Standard for Live
and Processed Bivalve Mollusks.
• Proposed Draft Standard for
Smoked Fish.
• Proposed Draft Standard for Quick
Frozen Scallop Adductor Muscle Meat.
• Proposed Draft Code of Practice on
the Processing of Scallop Meat.
• Proposed Draft Code of Practice for
Fish and Fishery Products (other
sections).
• Proposed Draft Amendment of the
Standard for Canned Sardines and
Sardine-Type Products (Clupea
bentincki).
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA;
USDC/NOAA/NMFS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 / Notices
Codex Committee on Milk and Milk
Products
The Codex Committee on Milk and
Milk Products is responsible for
establishing international codes and
standards for milk and milk products.
The Committee held its 6th Session in
Auckland, NZ on April 26–30, 2004.
The relevant document is ALINORM 04/
27/11.
For discussion at the 28th Session of
the Codex Alimentarius Commission in
July 2005.
• Proposal for a new standard for
Parmesan Cheese At its 7th Session, the
Committee will continue work on the
following:
At Step 6:
• Draft Standard for a Blend of
Evaporated Skimmed Milk and
Vegetable Fat.
• Draft Standard for a Blend of
Skimmed Milk and Vegetable Fat in
Powdered Form.
• Draft Standard for a Blend of
Sweetened Condensed Skimmed Milk
and Vegetable Fat.
• Draft Revised Standard for Whey
Cheese.
• Draft Revised Standards for
Cheddar (C–1) and Danbo (C–3).
Other work of the committee:
• Proposed Draft Revised Standards
for Individual Cheeses at Step 4.
• Proposed Template for Fermented
Milk Drinks Provisions.
• Proposed Draft Model Export
Certificate for Milk and Milk Products.
• Methods of Analysis and Sampling
for Milk Products.
• Proposed Draft Revised Standard
for Processed Cheese.
• Proposed Draft Revised Standard
for Dairy Spreads.
• Discussion paper on Proposed
Revision of the Codex Standard for
Extra Hard Grating Cheese.
• Discussion paper on the Issue of
Naming Non-standardized Dairy
Products.
Responsible Agency: USDA/AMS;
HHS/FDA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Fats and Oils
The Codex Committee on Fats and
Oils is responsible for elaborating
standards for fats and oils of animal,
vegetable, and marine origin. The
committee met in London, U.K.,
February 21–25, 2005. The relevant
document is 05/28/17. The following
will be considered by the Commission
at its July 2005 session.
To be considered at Step 5/8:
• Proposed Draft Amendments to the
Standard for Named Vegetable Oils:
Sesameseed Oil.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
To be considered at Step 5:
• Proposed Draft Amendments to the
Standard for Named Vegetable Oils:
Rice Bran Oil.
To be considered at Step 5 of the
Accelerated Procedure:
• Proposed Draft Revised Table 1 of
the Recommended International Code of
Practice for the Storage and Transport of
Edible Fats and Oils in Bulk.
New Work:
• Amendment of the Standard for
Named Vegetable Oils.
• Mid-oleic sunflowerseed oil.
• Mid-oleic acid soya bean oil.
• Low linolenic acid soya bean oil.
• Unbleached palm oil: total
carotenoids.
The Committee continues work on:
• Draft Standard for Fat Spreads and
Blended Spreads: Food additives.
• Draft List and Proposed Draft List of
Acceptable Previous Cargoes.
• Proposed Draft Amendment to the
Standard for Olive Oil: Linolenic Acid
content.
• Criteria for the Revision of Named
Vegetable oils.
• Consideration of ISO proposal to
amend the nomenclature of oils.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA;
USDA/ARS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Processed Fruits
and Vegetables
The Codex Committee on Processed
Fruits and Vegetables is responsible for
elaborating standards for Processed
Fruits and Vegetables. After having been
adjourned sine die, the Committee
reconvened in Washington, DC, in
March 1998 to begin work revising the
standards. The Committee held its most
recent session on September 27 October
1, 2004. The relevant document is
ALINORM 05/28/27.
To be considered at Step 5:
• Processed Tomato Concentrates.
• Preserved (Canned) Tomatoes.
• Certain Canned Citrus Fruits.
The committee is continuing work on:
• Draft Codex Standard for Pickled
Fruits and Vegetables.
• Proposed Draft Codex Standards
for:
• Jams, Jellies and Marmalades.
• Certain Canned Vegetables and
Guidelines for Packing Media for
Canned Vegetables.
Other work:
• Methods of Analysis for Processed
Fruits and Vegetables.
• Priority List for the Standardization
of Processed Fruits and Vegetables.
Discontinued work in this committee:
• Proposed Draft Standard for Soy
Sauce.
Responsible Agency: USDA/AMS;
HHS/FDA.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30681
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Meat Hygiene
The 24th Session of the Commission
decided to reactivate the Codex
Committee on Meat Hygiene with New
Zealand as Host Government. The
Terms of Reference were amended to
reflect the inclusion of poultry in its
mandate. The Committee completed its
work at its 11th Session and requested
the Commission that it be adjourned
sine die. The relevant document is
ALINORM 05/28/16.
To be considered at Step 8:
• Draft Code of Hygienic Practice for
Meat.
Responsible Agency: USDA/FSIS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Cereals, Pulses,
and Legumes
The 26th Session of the Codex
Alimentarius Commission adopted the
Proposed Draft Standard for Instant
Noodles at Step 5, on the
recommendation of the Coordinating
Committee for Asia, and advanced it to
Step 6 for consideration by the
Committee on Cereals, Pulses and
Legumes by correspondence. The
United States, as host government, has
circulated the Draft Standard for two
rounds of comments. Consideration of
the additives provisions will take place
in the Codex Committee on Food
Additives and Contaminants.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA;
USDA/GIPSA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Certain Codex Commodity Committees
Several Codex Alimentarius
Commodity Committees have adjourned
sine die. The following Committees fall
into this category:
• Cocoa Products and Chocolate.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
• Natural Mineral Water.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
• Sugars.
Responsible Agency: USDA/ARS;
HHS/FDA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
• Vegetable Proteins.
Responsible Agency: USDA/ARS;
HHS/FDA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Ad Hoc Intergovernmental Task Force
on Animal Feeding
The Commission at its 23rd Session
established the Ad Hoc
Intergovernmental Task Force on
Animal Feeding to develop guidelines
or standards as appropriate on good
animal feeding practices. The Revised
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
30682
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 / Notices
Draft Code of Practice for Good Animal
Feeding was held at Step 8 by the
Commission at its 26th Session in June
2003, with the exception that the
definition of ‘‘feed additive’’ and
paragraphs 11, 12, and 13 were
advanced to step 6. The Task Force held
its 5th Session on May 17–19, 2004 and
discussed:
• Revised Draft Code of Practice for
Good Animal Feeding (definition of
‘‘feed additive’’ and paragraphs 11, 12,
and 13).
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA;
USDA/APHIS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Ad Hoc Intergovernmental Task Force
on Fruit and Vegetable Juices
The Commission at its 23rd Session
established this Task Force to revise and
consolidate the existing Codex
standards and guidelines for fruit and
vegetable juices and related products,
giving preference to general standards.
These standards were originally
developed by the Joint UNECE/Codex
Group of Experts on the Standardization
of Fruit Juices which had been
abolished by its parent organizations.
The Task Force held its fourth and final
session in Fortaleza, Brazil, on October
11–15, 2004. The Task Force completed
the work assigned to the Task Force in
its Terms of Reference.
For Adoption at Step 8:
• Draft Codex General Standard for
Fruit Juices and Nectars.
• Draft Minimum Brix Level for
Reconstituted Juice and Reconstituted
Pure and Minimum Juice and/or Pure
Content for Fruit Nectars (%v/v)—
grapes, guava, mandarine/tangerine,
mango, passion fruit and tamarind
(Indian date) juices/nectars.
For Adoption at Step 5/8:
• Proposed Draft Minimum Brix
Level for Reconstituted Juice and
Reconstituted Pure and Minimum Juice
´
and/or Puree Content for Fruit nectars
(%v/v)—orange, lemon, lime, and
pineapple juices/nectars.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA;
USDA/AMS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
FAO/WHO Regional Coordinating
Committees
The Codex Alimentarius Commission
is made up of an Executive Committee,
as well as approximately 30 subsidiary
bodies. Included in these subsidiary
bodies are coordinating committees for
groups of countries located in proximity
to each other who share common
concerns. There are currently six
Regional Coordinating Committees:
• Coordinating Committee for Africa.
• Coordinating Committee for Asia.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
• Coordinating Committee for
Europe.
• Coordinating Committee for Latin
America and the Caribbean.
• Coordinating Committee for the
Near East.
• Coordinating Committee for North
America and the South-West Pacific.
The United States participates as an
active member of the Coordinating
Committee for North America and the
South-West Pacific, and is informed of
the other coordinating committees
through meeting documents, final
reports, and representation at meetings.
Each regional committee:
• Defines the problems and needs of
the region concerning food standards
and food control;
• Promotes within the committee
contacts for the mutual exchange of
information on proposed regulatory
initiatives and problems arising from
food control and stimulates the
strengthening of food control
infrastructures;
• Recommends to the Commission
the development of world-wide
standards for products of interest to the
region, including products considered
by the committee to have an
international market potential in the
future; and
• Serves a general coordinating role
for the region and performs such other
functions as may be entrusted to it by
the Commission.
Codex Coordinating Committee for
North America and the South-West
Pacific
The Coordinating Committee is
responsible for defining problems and
needs concerning food standards and
food control of all Codex member
countries of the region. Items coming
before the Commission in July include
the following. The committee met in
Apia, Samoa, on October 19–22, 2004.
The relevant document is ALINORM 05/
28/32.
• Recommendation that Samoa be
reappointed as Regional Coordinator.
• Support the development of a new
Standard for Parmesan cheese and adopt
the amendment of the Codex Standard
for Canned Sardines and Sardine-Type
Products.
Items on the agenda for the next
meeting may include:
• Codex working documents of
special interest to regional member
states.
• Joint FAO/WHO Evaluation of the
Codex Alimentarius and other FAO and
WHO Work on Food Standards.
• Strategic Plan for the Coordinating
Committee for North America and the
Southwest Pacific.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Trust Fund for the participation of
Developing Countries in Codex.
Responsible Agency: USDA/FSIS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Coordinating Committee for Asia
The Coordinating Committee met in
Jeju-Do, Republic of Korea on
September 7–10, 2004. The relevant
document is ALINORM—5/15.
To be considered at Step 5:
• Proposed Draft Standard for
Ginseng Products.
New work:
• Refrigerated, Non-fermented
Soybean Products.
Attachment 2—U.S. Codex
Alimentarius Officials Codex
Committee Chairpersons
Codex Committee on Food Hygiene
Dr. Karen Hulebak, Chief Scientist,
Office of Public Health Science, Food
Safety and Inspection Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Room
3130, South Building, Washington, DC
20250–3700, Phone: (202) 720–5735,
Fax: (202) 720–2980. E-mail:
karen.hulebak@fsis.usda.gov.
Codex Committee on Processed Fruits
and Vegetables
Mr. David L. Priester, Head,
Standardization Section, AMS Fruit &
Vegetable Programs, Fresh Products
Branch, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Room 1661, South Building, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0240. Phone:
(202) 720–2185. Fax: (202) 720–8871. Email: david.priester@usda.gov.
Codex Committee on Residues of
Veterinary Drugs in Foods
Dr. Stephen F. Sundlof, Director,
Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food
and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish
Place (HFV–1), Rockville, MD 20855,
Phone: (301) 827–2950, Fax: (301) 827–
8401, E-mail: ssundlof@cvm.fda.gov.
Codex Committee on Cereals, Pulses
and Legumes (Adjourned sine die)
Mr. Steven N. Tanner, Director,
Technical Services Division, Grain
Inspection, Packers & Stockyards
Administration, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 10383 N. Executive Hills
Boulevard, Kansas City, MO 64153–
1394, Phone: (816) 891–0401, Fax: (816)
891–0478, E-mail:
stanner@tsd.fgiskc.usda.gov.
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 / Notices
Listing of U.S. Delegates and Alternates
Worldwide General Subject Codex
Committees
Codex Committee on Residues of
Veterinary Drugs in Foods (Host
Government—United States)
U.S. Delegate
Dr. Steven D. Vaughn, Director, Office
of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center
for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Place,
Rockville, MD 20855, Phone: (301) 827–
1796, Fax: (301) 594–2297, E-mail:
SVaughn@cvm.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Dr. Alice Thaler, Staff Director,
Animal and Egg Production Food Safety
Staff, Food Safety and Inspection
Service, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250, Phone:
(202) 690–2683, Fax: (202) 720–8213, Email: alice.thaler@fsis.usda.gov.
Codex Committee on Food Additives
and Contaminants (Host Government—
The Netherlands)
U.S. Delegate
Dr. Terry C. Troxell, Director, Office
of Plant and Dairy Foods and Beverages,
Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition (HFS–300), Food and Drug
Administration, Harvey W. Wiley
Federal Building, 5100 Paint Branch
Parkway, College Park, MD 20740–3835,
Phone: (301) 436–1700, Fax: (301) 436–
2632, E-mail:
Terry.Troxell@cfsan.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Dr. Dennis M. Keefe, Office of Food
Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–265), Food
and Drug Administration, Harvey W.
Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint
Branch Parkway, College Park, MD
20740–3835, Phone: (301) 436–1284,
Fax: (301) 436–2972, E-mail:
dennis.keefe@cfsan.fda.gov.
Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues
(Host Government—The Netherlands)
U.S. Delegate
Lois Rossi, Director of Registration
Division, Office of Pesticide Programs,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460,
Phone: (703) 305–5035, Fax: (703) 305–
5147, E-mail:
Rossi.Lois@epamail.epa,gov.
Alternate Delegate
Dr. Robert Epstein, Associate Deputy
Administrator, Science and Technology,
Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
96456, Room 3522S, Mail Stop 0222,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20090, Phone (202)
720–2158, Fax: (202) 720–1484, E-mail:
Robert.Epstein@usda.gov.
Codex Committee on Methods of
Analysis and Sampling (Host
Government—Hungary)
U.S. Delegate
Dr. Gregory Diachenko, Director,
Division of Chemistry Research and
Environmental Review, Office of Food
Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), Food
and Drug Administration (HFS–245),
Harvey W. Wiley Federal Building, 5100
Paint Branch Parkway, College Park, MD
20740–3835, Phone (301) 436–1898,
Fax: (301) 436–2364, E-mail:
Gregory.Diachenko@cfsan.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Mr. Donald C. Kendall, Technical
Services Division, Grain, Inspection,
Packers & Stockyards Administration,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 10383
N. Ambassador Drive, Kansas City, MO
64153–1394, Phone: (816) 891–0463,
Fax: (816) 891–0478, E-mail:
Donald.C.Kendall@usda.gov.
Codex Committee on Food Import and
Export Inspection and Certification
Systems (Host Government—Australia)
U.S. Delegate
Dr. Catherine Carnevale, Director,
Office of Constituent Operations, Center
for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition,
Food and Drug Administration (HFS–
550), Harvey W. Wiley Federal Building,
5100 Paint Branch Parkway, College
Park, MD 20740–3835, Phone: (301)
436–2380, Fax: (301) 436–2612, E-mail:
Catherine.Carnevale@cfsan.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Karen Stuck, Chief, International
Policy Staff, Food Safety and Inspection
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Room 2137, South Building, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–3700, Phone:
(202) 720–3470, Fax: (202) 720–7990, Email: Karen.Stuck@fsis.usda.gov.
Codex Committee on General Principles
(Host Government—France)
U.S.Delegate
Note: A member of the Steering Committee
heads the delegation to meetings of the
General Principles Committee.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30683
Codex Committee on Food Labeling
(Host Government—Canada)
U.S. Delegate
Leslye Fraser, J.D., Director, Office of
Regulations and Policy, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition, FDA,
5100 Paint Branch Parkway (HFS–004),
College Park, MD 20740, Phone: (301)
436–2378, Fax: (301) 436–2637, E-mail:
leslye.fraser@fda.hhs.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Ms. Danielle Schor, Chief of Staff,
Office of the Administrator, Food Safety
and Inspection Service, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–
1400, Phone: (202) 720–6618, Fax: (202)
720–7771, E-mail:
danielle.schor@fsis.usda.gov.
Codex Committee on Food Hygiene
(Host Government—United States)
U.S. Delegate
Dr. Robert L. Buchanan, Director,
Office of Science, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug
Administration (HFS–006), Harvey W.
Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint
Branch Parkway, College Park, MD
20740–3835, Phone: (301) 436–2369,
Fax: (301) 436–2642, E-mail:
Robert.Buchanan@cfsan.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegates
Dr. Daniel Engeljohn, Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Policy, Program, and Employee
Development, Room 3149, South
Building, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250,
Phone: (202) 205–0495, Fax: (202) 401–
1760, E-mail:
Daniel.engeljohn@fsis.usda.gov.
Dr. Rebecca Buckner, Consumer
Safety Officer, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug
Administration, Room 3B–0033 Harvey
Wiley Building, 5100 Paint Branch
Parkway, College Park, MD 20740,
Phone: (301) 436–1486, Fax: (301) 436–
2632, E-mail:
Rebecca.Buckner@cfsan.fda.gov.
Codex Committee on Nutrition and
Food for Special Dietary Uses (Host
Government—Germany) U.S. Delegate
Barbara O. Schneeman, PhD, Director,
Office of Nutritional Products, Labeling
and Dietary Supplements, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition,
FDA, 5100 Paint Branch Highway,
College Park, MD 20740, Tel: (301) 436–
2373, Fax: (301) 436–2636, E-mail:
Barbara.Schneeman@cfsan.fda.gov.
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
30684
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 / Notices
Alternate Delegate
Patricia McKinney, Senior Program
Analyst, Office of Analysis, Nutrition
Service, Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room
1014, Alexandria, VA 22302, Tel: (703)
305–2126, Fax: (703) 305–2576, E-mail:
Pat.Mckinney@fns.usda.gov.
Worldwide Commodity Codex
Committees Codex Committee on Fresh
Fruits and Vegetables (Host
Government—Mexico)
U.S. Delegate
Dorian LaFond, International
Standards Coordinator, Fruit and
Vegetables Program, Agricultural
Marketing Service, Room 2086, South
Building, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250, Phone
(202) 690–4944, Fax: (202) 720–4722, Email: dorian.lafond@usda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Vacant.
Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery
Products (Host Government—Norway)
U.S. Delegate
Mr. Philip C. Spiller, Director, Office
of Seafood, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug
Administration (HFS–400), Harvey W.
Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint
Branch Parkway, College Park, MD
20740–3835, Phone: (301) 436–2300,
Fax: (301) 436–2599, E-mail:
Philip.Spiller@cfsan.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Mr. Richard V. Cano, Acting Director,
National Seafood Inspection Program,
NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce,
1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring,
MD 20910, Phone: (301) 713–2355, Fax:
(301) 713–1081, E-mail:
richard.cano@noaa.gov.
Codex Committee on Cereals, Pulses
and Legumes (Host Government—
United States)
U.S. Delegate
Mr. Charles W. Cooper, Director,
International Activities Staff, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition,
Food and Drug Administration (HFS–
585), Harvey W. Wiley Federal Building,
5100 Paint Branch Parkway, College
Park, MD 20740–3835, Phone: (301)
436–1714, Fax: (301) 436–2612, E-mail:
Charles.Cooper@cfsan.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Mr. David Shipman, Deputy
Administrator, Federal Grain Inspection
Division, Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration, U.S.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
Department of Agriculture, Room 1661,
South Building, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250,
Phone: (202) 720–9170, Fax: (202) 205–
9237, E-mail:
dshipman@gipsadc.usda.gov.
Codex Committee on Milk and Milk
Products (Host Government—New
Zealand)
U.S. Delegate
Mr. Duane Spomer, Associate Deputy
Administrator for Standards and
Grading, Dairy Programs, Agricultural
Marketing Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Room 2746, South
Building, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250, Phone:
(202) 720–3171, Fax: (202) 720–2643, Email: duane.spomer@usda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Alternate Delegate
Dr. Michelle Smith, Food
Technologist, Office of Plant and Dairy
Foods and Beverages, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and
Drug Administration (HFS–306), Harvey
W. Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint
Branch Parkway, College Park, MD
20740–3835, Phone: 301–436–2024,
Fax: 301–436–2651, E-mail:
Michelle.Smith@cfsan.fda.gov.
Codex Committee on Sugars (Host
Government—United Kingdom)
U.S. Delegate
Dr. Thomas L. Tew, Research
Geneticist, Sugarcane Research Unit,
Agricultural Research, USDA—FSIS,
5883 USDA Road, Houma, LA 70360,
Phone: (504) 872–5042, Fax: (504) 868–
8369, E-mail: ttew@nola.srrc.usda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
John F. Sheehan, Director, Division of
Dairy and Egg Safety, Office of Plant and
Dairy Foods, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition (HFS–306), Food and
Drug Administration, Harvey W. Wiley
Federal Building, 5100 Paint Branch
Parkway, College Park, MD 20740,
Phone: (301) 436–1488, Fax: (301) 436–
2632, E-mail:
john.sheehan@cfsan.fda.gov.
Dr. Dennis M. Keefe, Office of Food
Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug
Administration (HFS–265), Harvey W.
Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint
Branch Parkway, College Park, MD
20740–3835, Phone: (301) 436–1284,
Fax: (301) 436–2972, E-mail:
dennis.keefe@cfsan.fda.gov.
Codex Committee on Fats and Oils
(Host Government—United Kingdom)
Codex Committee on Processed Fruits
and Vegetables (Host Government—
United States)
U.S. Delegate
Mr. Charles W. Cooper, Director,
International Activities Staff, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition,
Food and Drug Administration (HFS–
585), Harvey W. Wiley Federal Building,
5100 Paint Branch Parkway, College
Park, MD 20740–3835, Phone: (301)
436–1714, Fax: (301) 436–2612, E-mail:
Charles.Cooper@cfsan.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Codex Committee on Cocoa Products
and Chocolate (Host Government—
Switzerland)
U.S. Delegate
Mr. Charles W. Cooper, Director,
International Activities Staff, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition,
Food and Drug Administration (HFS–
585), Harvey W. Wiley Federal Building,
5100 Paint Branch Parkway, College
Park, MD 20740–3835, Phone: (301)
436–1714, Fax: (301) 436–2612, E-mail:
Charles.Cooper@cfsan.fda.gov.
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Dorian Lafond, International
Standards Coordinator, Fruit and
Vegetable Division, Agricultural
Marketing Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Room 2086, South
Building, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250, Phone:
(202) 690–4944, Fax: (202) 720–0016,
E-mail: Dorian.Lafond@usda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Ms. Kathleen Warner, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 1815 N.
University Street, Peoria, IL 61604,
Phone (309) 681–6584, Fax: (309) 681–
6668, E-mail: warnerk@ncaur.usda.gov.
PO 00000
U.S. Delegate
Sfmt 4703
Mr. Charles W. Cooper, Director,
International Activities Staff, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition,
Food and Drug Administration (HFS–
585), Harvey W. Wiley Federal Building,
5100 Paint Branch Parkway, College
Park, MD 20740–3835, Phone: (301)
436–1714, Fax: (301) 436–2612, E-mail:
Charles.Cooper@cfsan.fda.gov.
Codex Committee on Vegetable Proteins
(Host Government—Canada)
U.S. Delegate
Dr. Wilda H. Martinez, Area Director,
ARS North Atlantic Area, Agricultural
Research Service, USDA, 600 E.
Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, PA 19038,
Phone: (215) 233–6593, Fax: (215) 233–
6719, E-mail: wmartinez@ars.usda.gov.
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 / Notices
Alternate Delegate
Dr. Jeanne Rader, Director, Division of
Research and Applied Technology,
Office of Nutritional Products, Labeling
and Dietary Supplements, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition,
Food and Drug Administration, Harvey
W. Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint
Branch Parkway, College Park, MD
20740–3835, Phone: (301) 436–1786,
Fax: (301) 436–2640, E-mail:
Jeanne.Rader@cfsan.fda.gov.
Codex Committee on Meat Hygiene
(Host Government—New Zealand)
U.S. Delegate
Dr. Perfecto Santiago, Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of Food
Security and Emergency Preparedness,
Room 3130, South Building, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250, Phone: (202)
205–0452, Fax: (202) 690–5634.
Perfecto.Santiago@fsis.usda.gov.
Center for Food Safety & Applied
Nutrition, Food and Drug
Administration (HFS–300), Harvey W.
Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint
Branch Parkway, College Park, MD
20740–3835, Phone: (301) 436–1700,
Fax: (301) 436–2632, E-mail:
Terry.troxell@cfsan.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Ms. Shellee Anderson, Office of
Nutritional Products, Labeling and
Dietary Supplements, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and
Drug Administration (HFS–830), Harvey
W. Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint
Branch Parkway, College Park, MD
20740–3835, Phone: (301) 436–1491,
Fax: (301) 436–2636, E-mail:
Shellee.Anderson@cfsan.fda.gov.
Ad Hoc Intergovernmental Task Forces;
Ad Hoc Intergovernmental Task Force
on Fruit and Vegetable Juices (Host
Government—Brazil)
Alternate Delegate
U.S. Delegate
Dr. William O. James, Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
International Affairs, Food Safety and
Inspection Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Room 3143, South
Building, Washington, DC 20250–3700,
Phone: (202) 720–5362, Fax: (202) 690–
3856, E-mail:
william.james@fsis.usda.gov.
Mr. Martin Stutsman, Office of Plant
and Dairy Foods, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug
Administration (HFS–306), Harvey W.
Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint
Branch Parkway, College Park, MD
20740–3835, Phone: (301) 436–1642,
Fax: (301) 436–2651, E-mail:
Martin.Stutsman@cfsan.fda.gov.
Codex Committee on Natural Mineral
Waters (Host Government—Switzerland)
Alternate Delegate
Vacant.
U.S. Delegate
Dr. Terry C. Troxell, Director, Office
of Plant and Dairy Foods and Beverages,
30685
Ad Hoc Intergovernmental Task Force
on Foods Derived From Modern
Biotechnology (Host Government—
Japan)
U.S. Delegate
Bernice Slutsky, Ph.D., Special
Assistant to the Secretary for
Biotechnology, Office of the Secretary,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250, Phone: (202)
720–3631, Fax: (202) 720–6314, E-mail:
Bernice.Slutsky@usda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Eric Flamm, Ph.D., Senior Advisor,
Office of the Commissioner, Food and
Drug Administration, Room 1561
Parklawn Building, Rockville, MD
20857, Phone: (301) 827–0591, FAX:
(301) 827–4774, E-mail:
EFLAMM@OC.FDA.GOV.
There are six regional coordinating
committees:
Coordinating Committee for Africa
Coordinating Committee for Asia
Coordinating Committee for Europe
Coordinating Committee for Latin
America and the Caribbean
Coordinating Committee for the Near
East
Coordinating Committee for North
America and the South-West
Pacific
Contact: Paulo Almeida, Office
Manager, U.S. Codex Office, Food Safety
and Inspection Service, Room 4861,
South Building, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–
3700, Phone (202) 205–7760, Fax (202)
720–3157, E-mail:
Paulo.Almeida@fsis.usda.gov.
ATTACHMENT 3.—TIMETABLE OF CODEX SESSIONS
[June 2004 through June 2006]
2004:
CX 702–54 ......
CX 701–27 ......
CX 727–14 ......
CX 706–24 ......
CX 713–22 ......
CX 801–03 ......
CX 732–08 ......
CX 730–15 ......
CX 720–26 ......
CX 716–21 ......
CX 725–14 ......
CX 733–13 ......
VerDate jul<14>2003
Executive Committee (54th session) .............................
Codex Alimentarius Commission (27th Session) ...........
Regional Coordinating Committee for Asia (14th Session).
Regional Coordinating Committee for Europe (24th
Session).
Codex Committee on Processed Fruits and Vegetables
(22nd Session).
Ad Hoc Intergovernmental Task Force on Fruit and
Vegetable Juices (3rd Session).
Regional Coordinating Committee for North America
and South West Pacific (8th Session).
Codex Committee on Residue of Veterinary Drugs in
Foods (15th Session).
Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special
Dietary Uses (26th Session).
Codex Committee on General Principles (21st Session).
Regional Coordinating Committee for Latin America
and the Caribbean (14th Session).
Codex Committee on Food Import and Export Certification Systems (13th Session).
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
24–26 June ............................
28 June–2 July ......................
7–10 September ....................
Geneva (Switzerland).
Geneva (Switzerland).
JeJu (City) Republic of Korea.
20–23 September ..................
Bratislava (Slovak Republic).
27 September–1 October ......
Arlington, VA (USA).
11–15 October .......................
Fortaleza (Brazil).
19–22 October .......................
Apia (Samoa).
25–28 October .......................
Arlington, VA (USA).
1–5 November .......................
Bonn (Germany).
15–19 November ...................
Paris (France).
29 November–3 December ...
Buenos Aires (Argentina).
6–10 December .....................
Melbourne (Australia).
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
30686
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 / Notices
ATTACHMENT 3.—TIMETABLE OF CODEX SESSIONS—Continued
[June 2004 through June 2006]
2005:
CX 707–16 ......
CX 702–55 ......
CX 723–11 ......
CX 709–19 ......
CX 722–27 ......
CX 734–03 ......
CX 712–37 ......
CX 715–26 ......
CX 716–22 ......
CX 718–37 ......
CX 711–37 ......
CX 714–33 ......
CX 731–12 ......
CX
CX
CX
CX
702–56 ......
701–28 ......
804–1 ........
720–14 ......
CX 733–14 ......
CX 702–57 ......
2006:
CX 703–7 ........
CX 718–38 ......
CX 716–23 ......
CX 711–38 ......
CX 714–34 ......
CX 730–16 ......
CX 715–27 ......
CX 702–58 ......
CX 201–29 ......
Regional Coordinating Committee for Africa (16th Session).
Executive Committee (55th Session) .............................
Codex Committee on Meat and Poultry Hygiene (11th
Session).
Codex Committee on Fats and Oils (19th Session) ......
Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery Products (27th
Session).
Regional Coordinating Committee for Near East (3rd
Session).
Codex Committee on Food Hygiene (37th Session) .....
Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling (26th Session).
Codex Committee on General Principles (22nd Session).
Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (37th Session).
Codex Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants (37th Session).
Codex Committee on Food Labelling (33rd Session) ....
Codex Committee on Fresh Fruits and Vegetables
(12th Session).
Executive Committee (56th Session) .............................
Codex Alimentarius Commission (28th Session) ...........
Ad Hoc Task Force on Biotechnology ...........................
Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special
Dietary Uses (27th Session).
Codex Committee on Food Import and Export Inspection and Certification Systems (14th Session).
Executive Committee (57th Session) .............................
25–28 January .......................
Rome (FAO) (Italy).
9–11 February .......................
14–18 February .....................
Rome (FAO) (Italy).
Christchurch (New Zealand).
21–25 February .....................
28 February–4 March ............
London (United Kingdom).
Capetown (South Africa).
7–10 March ............................
Amman (Jordan).
14–19 April .............................
4–8 April .................................
Buenos Aires (Argentina).
Budapest (Hungary).
11–15 April .............................
Paris (France).
18–23 April .............................
The Hague (The Netherlands).
25–29 April .............................
The Hague (The Netherlands).
9–13 May ...............................
16–20 May .............................
Kota Kinabalu (Malaysia).
Mexico City Mexico).
6 June–2 July ........................
4–9 July .................................
19–23 September ..................
21–25 November ...................
Rome (Italy).
Rome (Italy).
TBA (Japan).
Bonn (Germany).
28 November–2 December ....
TBA (Australia).
30 November–2 December ....
Geneva (Switzerland).
Codex Committee on Milk and Milk Products (7th Session).
Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (38th Session).
Codex Committee on General Principles (23rd Session).
Codex Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants (38th Session).
Codex Committee on Food Labelling (34th Session) ....
Codex Committee on Residue of Veterinary Drugs in
Food (16th Session).
Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling (27th Session).
Executive Committee (58th Session) .............................
Codex Alimentarius Commission (29th Session) ...........
27–31 March ..........................
TBA (New Zealand).
3–8 April .................................
TBA (Brazil).
9–13 April ...............................
Paris (France).
24–28 April .............................
The Hague (The Netherlands).
1–5 May .................................
8–12 May ...............................
Ottawa (Canada).
Washington, DC (USA).
15–19 May .............................
Budapest (Hungary).
28–30 June ............................
3–8 July .................................
Geneva (Switzerland).
Geneva (Switzerland).
Attachment 4—Definitions for the
Purpose of Codex Alimentarius
Words and phrases have specific
meanings when used by the Codex
Alimentarius.
For the purposes of Codex, the
following definitions apply:
1. Food means any substance,
whether processed, semi-processed or
raw, which is intended for human
consumption, and includes drink,
chewing gum, and any substance which
has been used in the manufacture,
preparation or treatment of ‘‘food’’ but
does not include cosmetics or tobacco or
substances used only as drugs.
2. Food hygiene comprises conditions
and measures necessary for the
production, processing, storage and
distribution of food designed to ensure
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
a safe, sound, wholesome product fit for
human consumption.
3. Food additive means any substance
not normally consumed as a food by
itself and not normally used as a typical
ingredient of the food, whether or not it
has nutritive value, the intentional
addition of which to food for a
technological (including organoleptic)
purpose in the manufacture, processing,
preparation, treatment, packing,
packaging, transport, or holding of such
food results, or may be reasonably
expected to result, (directly or
indirectly) in it or its by-products
becoming a component of or otherwise
affecting the characteristics of such
foods. The food additive term does not
include ‘‘contaminants’’ or substances
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
added to food for maintaining or
improving nutritional qualities.
4. Contaminant means any substance
not intentionally added to food, which
is present in such food as a result of the
production (including operations
carried out in crop husbandry, animal
husbandry, and veterinary medicine),
manufacture, processing, preparation,
treatment, packing, packaging, transport
or holding of such food or as a result of
environmental contamination. The term
does not include insect fragments,
rodent hairs and other extraneous
matters.
5. Pesticide means any substance
intended for preventing, destroying,
attracting, repelling, or controlling any
pest including unwanted species of
plants or animals during the production,
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 / Notices
storage, transport, distribution and
processing of food, agricultural
commodities, or animal feeds or which
may be administered to animals for the
control of ectoparasites. The term
includes substances intended for use as
a plant-growth regulator, defoliant,
desiccant, fruit thinning agent, or
sprouting inhibitor and substances
applied to crops either before of after
harvest to protect the commodity from
deterioration during storage and
transport. The term pesticides excludes
fertilizers, plant and animal nutrients,
food additives, and animal drugs.
6. Pesticide residue means any
specified substance in food, agricultural
commodities, or animal feed resulting
from the use of a pesticide. The term
includes any derivatives of a pesticide,
such as conversion products,
metabolites, reaction products, and
impurities considered to be of
toxological significance.
7. Good Agricultural Practice in the
Use of Pesticides (GAP) includes the
nationally authorized safe uses of
pesticides under actual conditions
necessary for effective and reliable pest
control. It encompasses a range of levels
of pesticide applications up to the
highest authorized use, applied in a
manner that leaves a residue, which is
the smallest amount practicable.
Authorized safe uses are determined
at the national level and include
nationally registered or recommended
uses, which take into account public
and occupational health and
environmental safety considerations.
Actual conditions include any stage
in the production, storage, transport,
distribution and processing of food
commodities and animal feed.
8. Codex Maximum Limit for Pesticide
Residues (MRLP) is the maximum
concentration of a pesticide residue
(expressed as mg/kg), recommended by
the Codex Alimentarius Commission to
be legally permitted in or on food
commodities and animal feeds. MRLPs
are based on their toxological affects
and on GAP data and foods derived
from commodities that comply with the
respective MRLPs are intended to be
toxologically acceptable.
Codex MRLPs, which are primarily
intended to apply in international trade,
are derived from reviews conducted by
the JMPR following:
(a) Toxological assessment of the
pesticide and its residue, and
(b) Review of residue data from
supervised trials and supervised uses
including those reflecting national good
agricultural practices. Data from
supervised trials conducted at the
highest nationally recommended,
authorized, or registered uses are
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
included in the review. In order to
accommodate variations in national pest
control requirements, Codex MRLPs
take into account the higher levels
shown to arise in such supervised trials,
which are considered to represent
effective pest control practices.
Consideration of the various dietary
residue intake estimates and
determinations both at the national and
international level in comparison with
the ADI, should indicate that foods
complying with Codex MRLPs are safe
for human consumption.
9. Veterinary Drug means any
substance applied or administered to
any food-producing animal, such as
meat or milk-producing animals,
poultry, fish or bees, whether used for
therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic
purposes or for modification of
physiological functions or behavior.
10. Residues of Veterinary Drugs
include the parent compounds and/or
their metabolites in any edible portion
of the animal product, and include
residues of associated impurities of the
veterinary drug concerned.
11. Codex Maximum Limit for
Residues of Veterinary Drugs (MRLVD)
is the maximum concentration of
residue resulting from the use of a
veterinary drug (expressed in mg/kg or
µg/kg on a fresh weight basis) that is
recommended by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission to be legally
permitted or recognized as acceptable in
or on food.
An MRLVD is based on the type and
amount of residue considered to be
without any toxological hazard for
human health as expressed by the
Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI), or on the
basis of a temporary ADI that utilizes an
additional safety factor. An MRLVD also
takes into account other relevant public
health risks as well as food
technological aspects.
When establishing an MRLVD,
consideration is also given to residues
that occur in food of plant origin and/
or the environment. Furthermore, the
MRLVD may be reduced to be consistent
with good practices in the use of
veterinary drugs and to the extent that
practical and analytical methods are
available.
12. Good Practice in the Use of
Veterinary Drugs (GPVD) is the official
recommended or authorized usage
including withdrawal periods approved
by national authorities, of veterinary
drugs under practicable conditions.
13. Processing Aid means any
substance or material, not including
apparatus or utensils, not consumed as
a food ingredient by itself, intentionally
used in the processing of raw materials,
foods or its ingredients, to fulfill a
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30687
certain technological purpose during
treatment or processing and which may
result in the non-intentional but
unavoidable presence of residues or
derivatives in the final product.
Definitions of Risk Analysis Terms
Related to Food Safety Hazard: A
biological, chemical or physical agent
in, or condition of, food with the
potential to cause an adverse health
effect.
Hazard Identification: The
identification of biological, chemical,
and physical agents capable of causing
adverse health effects and which may be
present in a particular food or group of
foods.
Hazard Characterization: The
qualitative and/or quantitative
evaluation of the nature of the adverse
health effects associated with biological,
chemical and physical agents that may
be present in food. For chemical agents,
a dose-response assessment should be
performed. For biological or physical
agents, a dose-response assessment
should be performed if the data are
obtainable.
Dose-Response Assessment: The
determination of the relationship
between the magnitude of exposure
(dose) to a chemical, biological or
physical agent and the severity and/or
frequency of associated adverse health
effects (response).
Exposure Assessment: The qualitative
and/or quantitative evaluation of the
likely intake of biological, chemical, and
physical agents via food as well as
exposures from other sources if relevant.
Risk: A function of the probability of
an adverse health effect and the severity
of that effect, consequential to a
hazard(s) in food.
Risk Analysis: A process consisting of
three components: Risk assessment, risk
management and risk communication.
Risk Assessment: A scientifically
based process consisting of the
following steps: (i) Hazard
identification, (ii) hazard
characterization, (iii) exposure
assessment, and (iv) risk
characterization.
Risk Assessment Policy: Documented
guidelines on the choice of options and
associated judgments for their
application at appropriate decision
points in the risk assessment such that
the scientific integrity of the process is
maintained.
Risk Characterization: The qualitative
and/or quantitative estimation,
including attendant uncertainties, of the
probability of occurrence and severity of
known or potential adverse health
effects in a given population based on
hazard identification, hazard
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
30688
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 / Notices
characterization and exposure
assessment.
Risk Communication: The interactive
exchange of information and opinions
throughout the risk analysis process
concerning risk, related risk factors and
risk perceptions, among risk assessors,
risk managers, consumers, industry, the
academic community and other
interested parties, including the
explanation of risk assessment findings
and the basis of risk management
decisions.
Risk Estimate: The quantitative
estimation of risk resulting from risk
characterization.
Risk Management: The process,
distinct from risk assessment, of
weighing policy alternatives, in
consultation with all interested parties,
considering risk assessment and other
factors relevant for the health protection
of consumers and for the promotion of
fair trade practices, and, if needed,
selecting appropriate prevention and
control options.
Risk Profile: The description of the
food safety problem and its context.
Food Safety Objective (FSO): The
maximum frequency and/or
concentration of a hazard in a food at
the time of consumption that provides
or contributes to the appropriate level of
protection (ALOP).
Performance Criterion (PC): The effect
in frequency and/or concentration of a
hazard in a food that must be achieved
by the application of one or more
control measures to provide or
contribute to a PO or an FSO.
Performance Objective (PO): The
maximum frequency and/or
concentration of a hazard in a food at a
specified step in the food chain before
the time of consumption that provides
or contributes to an FSO or ALOP, as
applicable.
Attachment 5
Part 1—Uniform Procedure for the
Elaboration of Codex Standards and
Related Texts
Steps 1, 2 and 3
(1) The Commission decides, taking
into account the ‘‘Criteria for the
Establishment of Work Priorities and for
the Establishment of Subsidiary
Bodies,’’ to elaborate a Worldwide
Codex Standard and also decides which
subsidiary body or other body should
undertake the work. A decision to
elaborate a Worldwide Codex Standard
may also be taken by subsidiary bodies
of the Commission in accordance with
the above-mentioned criteria, subject to
subsequent approval by the Commission
or its Executive Committee at the
earliest possible opportunity. In the case
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
of Codex Regional Standards, the
Commission shall base its decision on
the proposal of the majority of members
belonging to a given region or group of
countries submitted at a session of the
Codex Alimentarius Commission.
(2) The Secretariat arranges for the
preparation of a proposed draft
standard. In the case of Maximum
Limits for Residues of Pesticides or
Veterinary Drugs, the Secretariat
distributes the recommendations for
maximum limits, when available from
the Joint Meetings of the FAO Panel of
Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food
and the Environment and the WHO
Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues
(JMPR), or the Joint FAO/WHO Expert
Committee on Food Additives (JECFA).
In the cases of milk and milk products
or individual standards for cheeses, the
Secretariat distributes the
recommendations of the International
Dairy Federation (IDF).
(3) The proposed draft standard is
sent to members of the Commission and
interested international organizations
for comment on all aspects including
possible implications of the proposed
draft standard for their economic
interests.
Step 4
The comments received are sent by
the Secretariat to the subsidiary body or
other body concerned which has the
power to consider such comments and
to amend the proposed draft standard.
Step 5
The proposed draft standard is
submitted through the Secretariat to the
Commission or to the Executive
Committee with a view to its adoption
as a draft standard. When making any
decision at this step, the Commission or
the Executive Committee will give due
consideration to any comments that may
be submitted by any of its members
regarding the implications which the
proposed draft standard or any
provisions of the standard may have for
their economic interests. In the case of
Regional Standards, all members of the
Commission may present their
comments, take part in the debate and
propose amendments, but only the
majority of the Members of the region or
group of countries concerned attending
the session can decide to amend or
adopt the draft. When making any
decisions at this step, the members of
the region or group of countries
concerned will give due consideration
to any comments that may be submitted
by any of the members of the
Commission regarding the implications
which the proposed draft standard or
any provisions of the proposed draft
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
standard may have for their economic
interests.
Step 6
The draft standard is sent by the
Secretariat to all members and
interested international organizations
for comment on all aspects, including
possible implications of the draft
standard for their economic interests.
Step 7
The comments received are sent by
the Secretariat to the subsidiary body or
other body concerned, which has the
power to consider such comments and
amend the draft standard.
Step 8
The draft standard is submitted
through the Secretariat to the
Commission together with any written
proposals received from members and
interested international organizations
for amendments at Step 8 with a view
to its adoption as a Codex Standard. In
the case of Regional standards, all
members and interested international
organizations may present their
comments, take part in the debate and
propose amendments but only the
majority of members of the region or
group of countries concerned attending
the session can decide to amend and
adopt the draft.
Part 2—Uniform Accelerated Procedure
for the Elaboration of Codex Standards
and Related Texts
Steps 1, 2 and 3
(1) The Commission or the Executive
Committee between Commission
sessions, on the basis of a two-thirds
majority of votes cast, taking into
account the ‘‘Criteria for the
Establishment of Work Priorities and for
the Establishment of Subsidiary
Bodies’’, shall identify those standards
which shall be the subject of an
accelerated elaboration process. The
identification of such standards may
also be made by subsidiary bodies of the
Commission, on the basis of a twothirds majority of votes cast, subject to
confirmation at the earliest opportunity
by the Commission or its Executive
Committee by a two-thirds majority of
votes cast.
(2) The Secretariat arranges for the
preparation of a proposed draft
standard. In the case of Maximum
Limits for Residues of Pesticides or
Veterinary Drugs, the Secretariat
distributes the recommendations for
maximum limits, when available from
the Joint Meetings of the FAO Panel of
Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food
and the Environment and the WHO
Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 / Notices
(JMPR), or the Joint FAO/WHO Expert
Committee on Food Additives (JECFA).
In the cases of milk and milk products
or individual standards for cheeses, the
Secretariat distributes the
recommendations of the International
Dairy Federation (IDF).
(3) The proposed draft standard is
sent to Members of the Commission and
interested international organizations
for comment on all aspects including
possible implications of the proposed
draft standard for their economic
interests. When standards are subject to
an accelerated procedure, this fact shall
be notified to the Members of the
Commission and the interested
international organizations.
Step 4
The comments received are sent by
the Secretariat to the subsidiary body or
other body concerned which has the
power to consider such comments and
to amend the proposed draft standard.
Step 5
In the case of standards identified as
being subject to an accelerated
elaboration procedure, the draft
standard is submitted through the
Secretariat to the Commission together
with any written proposals received
from Members and interested
international organizations for
amendments with a view to its adoption
as a Codex standard. In taking any
decision at this step, the Commission
will give due consideration to any
comments that may be submitted by any
of its Members regarding the
implications which the proposed draft
standard or any provisions thereof may
have for their economic interests.
Attachment 6—Nature of Codex
Standards
Codex standards contain requirements
for food aimed at ensuring for the
consumer a sound, wholesome food
product free from adulteration, and
correctly labelled. A Codex standard for
any food or foods should be drawn up
in accordance with the Format for
Codex Commodity Standards and
contain, as appropriate, the criteria
listed therein.
Format for Codex Commodity Standards
Including Standards Elaborated Under
the Code of Principles Concerning Milk
and Milk Products
Introduction
The format is also intended for use as
a guide by the subsidiary bodies of the
Codex Alimentarius Commission in
presenting their standards, with the
object of achieving, as far as possible, a
uniform presentation of commodity
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
standards. The format also indicates the
statements which should be included in
standards as appropriate under the
relevant headings of the standard. The
sections of the format required to be
completed for a standard are only those
provisions that are appropriate to an
international standard for the food in
question.
Name of the Standard
Scope
Description
Essential Composition and Quality Factors
Food Additives
Contaminants
Hygiene
Weights and Measures
Labelling
Methods of Analysis and Sampling
Format for Codex Standards
Name of the Standard
The name of the standard should be
clear and as concise as possible. It
should usually be the common name by
which the food covered by the standard
is known or, if more than one food is
dealt with in the standard, by a generic
name covering them all. If a fully
informative title is inordinately long, a
subtitle could be added.
Scope
This section should contain a clear,
concise statement as to the food or foods
to which the standard is applicable
unless the name of the standard clearly
and concisely identifies the food or
foods. A generic standard covering more
than one specific product should clearly
identify the specific products to which
the standard applies.
Description
This section should contain a
definition of the product or products
with an indication, where appropriate,
of the raw materials from which the
product or products are derived and any
necessary references to processes of
manufacture. The description may also
include references to types and styles of
product and to type of pack. The
description may also include additional
definitions when these additional
definitions are required to clarify the
meaning of the standard.
Essential Composition and Quality
Factors
This section should contain all
quantitative and other requirements as
to composition including, where
necessary, identity characteristics,
provisions on packing media and
requirements as to compulsory and
optional ingredients. It should also
include quality factors that are essential
for the designation, definition, or
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30689
composition of the product concerned.
Such factors could include the quality
of the raw material, with the object of
protecting the health of the consumer,
provisions on taste, odor, color, and
texture which may be apprehended by
the senses, and basic quality criteria for
the finished products, with the object of
preventing fraud. This section may refer
to tolerances for defects, such as
blemishes or imperfect material, but this
information should be contained in
appendix to the standard or in another
advisory text.
Food Additives
This section should contain the
names of the additives permitted and,
where appropriate, the maximum
amount permitted in the food. It should
be prepared in accordance with
guidance given on page of the Codex
Procedural Manual and may take the
following form:
‘‘The following provisions in respect of
food additives and their specifications
as contained in section * * * of the
Codex Alimentarius are subject to
endorsement [have been endorsed] by
the Codex Committee on Food
Additives and Contaminants.’’
A tabulation should then follow, viz.:
‘‘Name of additive, maximum level
(in percentage or mg/kg).’’
Contaminants
(a) Pesticide Residues: This section
should include, by reference, any levels
for pesticide residues that have been
established by the Codex Committee on
Pesticide Residues for the product
concerned.
(b) Other Contaminants: In addition,
this section should contain the names of
other contaminants and where
appropriate the maximum level
permitted in the food, and the text to
appear in the standard may take the
following form:
‘‘The following provisions in respect of
contaminants, other than pesticide
residues, are subject to endorsement
[have been endorsed] by the Codex
Committee on Food Additives and
Contaminants.’’
A tabulation should then follow, viz.:
‘‘Name of contaminant, maximum
level (in percentage or mg/kg).’’
Hygiene
Any specific mandatory hygiene
provisions considered necessary should
be included in this section. They should
be prepared in accordance with the
guidance given in the Codex Procedural
Manual. Reference should also be made
to applicable codes of hygienic practice.
Any parts of such codes, including in
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
30690
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 / Notices
particular any end-product
specifications, should be set out in the
standard, if it is considered necessary
that they should be made mandatory.
The following statement should also
appear:
‘‘The following provisions in respect of
the food hygiene of the product are
subject to endorsement [have been
endorsed] by the Codex Committee on
Food Hygiene.’’
‘‘The methods of analysis and sampling
described hereunder are to be endorsed [have
been endorsed] by the Codex Committee on
Methods of Analysis and Sampling.’’
Weights and Measures
Black Hills National Forest, Bearlodge
Ranger District, Wyoming, Dean
Project Area Proposal and Analysis
This section should include all
provisions, other than labelling
provisions, relating to weights and
measures, e.g., where appropriate, fill of
container, weight, measure or count of
units determined by an appropriate
method of sampling and analysis.
Weights and measures should be
expressed in S.I. units. In the case of
standards which include provisions for
the sale of products in standardized
amounts, e.g. multiples of 100 grams,
S.I. units should be used, but this would
not preclude additional statements in
the standards of these standardized
amounts in approximately similar
amounts in other systems of weights
and measures.
Labelling
This section should include all the
labelling provisions contained in the
standard and should be prepared in
accordance with the guidance given in
the Codex Procedural Manual.
Provisions should be included by
reference to the General Standard for the
Labelling of Prepackaged Foods. The
section may also contain provisions
which are exemptions from, additions
to, or which are necessary for the
interpretation of the General Standard
in respect of the product concerned
provided that these can be justified
fully. The following statement should
also appear:
‘‘The following provisions in respect of the
labelling of this product are subject to
endorsement [have been endorsed] by the
Codex Committee on Food Labelling.’’
Methods of Analysis and Sampling
This section should include, either
specifically or by reference, all methods
of analysis and sampling considered
necessary and should be prepared in
accordance with the guidance given in
the Codex Procedural Manual. If two or
more methods have been proved to be
equivalent by the Codex Committee on
Methods of Analysis and Sampling,
these could be regarded as alternatives
and included in this section either
specifically or by reference. The
following statement should also appear:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 May 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
[FR Doc. 05–10636 Filed 5–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Forest Service, USDA.
Revised notice of intent to
prepare an environmental impact
statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will
prepare an environmental impact
statement on a proposal to implement
multiple resource management actions
within the Dean Area as directed by the
Black Hills National Forest Land and
Resource Management Plan. The Dean
Project Area covers about 12,468 acres
of National Forest System land and
about 2,256 acres of interspersed private
land within the Redwater Creek
watershed directly north of Sundance,
Wyoming. Proposed actions would
modify the structure of forest stands
across the planning area to reduce fuel
loads, potential for uncharacteristically
intense wildfire behavior, and risk of
insect outbreaks; provide for diverse
wildlife habitat and restore hardwood;
and provide a mix of motorized and
non-motorized use opportunities. This
revised Notice of Intent is being issued
because of a change in the designated
responsible official.
DATES: Scoping was conducting as
described in the Notice of Intent of
November 24, 2004 (69 FR 68303).
Comments submitted during scoping for
the proposed action are part of the
project record and were considered in
developing the Draft EIS. The Draft EIS
was issued in March 2005 (70 FR
12211), and the comment period was
extended once (70 FR 19951).
Comments were accepted through May
2, 2005. These comments are being
considered during completion of the
Final EIS. The Final environmental
impact statement is expected in June
2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janis Bouma, Project Coordinator, Black
Hills National Forest, Bearlodge Ranger
District, 121 S. 21st Street, Sundance,
Wyoming 82729, phone (307) 283–1361.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
actions are proposed in direct response
to management direction provided by
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Black Hills National Forest Land
and Resource Management Plan (Forest
Plan). The site-specific actions are based
on Forest Plan Standards and
Guidelines to promote existing resource
conditions in the Dean Project Area
toward meeting Forest Plan Goals and
Objectives. The project area lies in the
Bear Lodge Mountains in the Black Hills
National Forest, directly north of
Sundance, Wyoming. Issues considered
include: Fire and fuel hazard reduction;
impacts of vegetation treatment and
multiple forest uses on wildlife and fish
habitat; and travel management and
recreation.
Purpose of and Need for Action
There is a need to reduce the potential
for uncharacteristically intense wildfire
behavior and insect infestation, provide
diverse wildlife habitat, and manage
motorized recreation in the Dean Project
Area. This project will address Forest
Plan Goal 2 (providing for biologically
diverse ecosystems) and Goal 3
(providing for sustained commodity
uses) consistent with Forest Plan
Standards and Guidelines.
Proposed Action
Actions proposed in the Dean Project
Area include:
• Modifying stand structure across
the planning area to reduce potential for
uncharacteristically intense wildfire
behavior and benefit wildlife. This
action includes thinning the forest,
removing conifers from stands of
hardwoods such as aspen, bur oak, and
birch, and expanding and/or creating
meadows.
• Reducing fuel loads by decreasing
the volume and arrangement of both
existing fuels and those resulting from
other vegetation treatment activities.
Treatment could include lopping,
chipping, crushing, piling and burning,
and prescribed burning on up to 2,971
acres.
• Reducing the density of pine stands
on up to 4,840 acres to decrease the
potential for spreading crown fires,
increase tree growth and vigor, and
lessen the risk of insect infestation and
disease. This may be done by using
commercial timber harvest to thin out
merchantable trees and using other
methods to thin small, unmerchantable
trees. These actions would provide
wood fiber to local industry and would
require construction of up to 5.7 miles
of new specified roads.
• Modifying the Forest Plan through
a non-significant amendment to change
Management Area (MA) designation in
part of the project area to better reflect
actual conditions. The entire project
area is currently in MA 5.4 (Big Game
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 102 (Friday, May 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30675-30690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-10636]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 102 / Friday, May 27, 2005 /
Notices
[[Page 30675]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
[Docket No. 05-003N]
International Standard-Setting Activities
AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice informs the public of the sanitary and
phytosanitary standard-setting activities of the Codex Alimentarius
Commission (Codex), in accordance with section 491 of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended, and the Uruguay Round Agreements
Act, Public Law 103-465, 108 Stat. 4809. This notice also provides a
list of other standard-setting activities of Codex, including commodity
standards, guidelines, codes of practice, and revised texts. This
notice, which covers the time periods from June 1, 2004, to May 31,
2005, and June 1, 2005, to May 31, 2006, seeks comments on standards
currently under consideration and recommendations for new standards.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail, including floppy disks or CD-ROM's, and hand-or
courier-delivered items: Send to Docket Clerk, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, 300 12th Street, SW.,
Room 102 Cotton Annex, Washington, DC 20250.
All submissions received must include the Agency name and docket
number 05-003N. Please state that your comments refer to Codex and, if
your comments relate to specific Codex committees, please identify
those committees in your comments and submit a copy of your comments to
the delegate from that particular committee. All comments submitted
will be available for public inspection in the FSIS Docket Room at the
address listed above between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday. The comments also will be posted on the Agency's Web site at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/regulations/2005_notices_index/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: F. Edward Scarbrough, Ph.D., United
States Manager for Codex, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the
Under Secretary for Food Safety, Room 4861, South Agriculture Building,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-3700; (202) 205-
7760. For information pertaining to particular committees, the delegate
of that committee may be contacted. (A complete list of U.S. delegates
and alternate delegates can be found in Attachment 2 to this notice.)
Documents pertaining to Codex are accessible via the World Wide Web at
the following address: https://www.codexalimentarius.net/current.asp.
The U.S. Codex Office also maintains a Web site at https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/Regulations_&_Policies/Codex_Alime ntarius/
index.asp.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The World Trade Organization (WTO) was established on January 1,
1995, as the common international institutional framework for the
conduct of trade relations among its members in matters related to the
Uruguay Round Trade Agreements. The WTO is the successor organization
to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). U.S. membership
in the WTO was approved and the Uruguay Round Agreements Act was signed
into law by the President on December 8, 1994. The Uruguay Round
Agreements became effective, with respect to the United States, on
January 1, 1995. Pursuant to section 491 of the Trade Agreements Act of
1979, as amended, the President is required to designate an agency to
be responsible for informing the public of the sanitary and
phytosanitary (SPS) standard-setting activities of each international
standard-setting organization, Codex, World Organization for Animal
Health, and the International Plant Protection Convention. The
President, pursuant to Proclamation No. 6780 of March 23, 1995 (60 FR
15845), designated the U.S. Department of Agriculture as the agency
responsible for informing the public of SPS standard-setting activities
of each international standard-setting organization. The Secretary of
Agriculture has delegated to the Administrator, Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS), the responsibility to inform the public of
the SPS standard-setting activities of Codex. The FSIS Administrator
has, in turn, assigned the responsibility for informing the public of
the SPS standard-setting activities of Codex to the U.S. Codex Office,
FSIS.
Codex was created in 1962 by two U.N. organizations, the Food and
Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO).
Codex is the principal international organization for encouraging fair
international trade in food and protecting the health and economic
interests of consumers. Through adoption of food standards, codes of
practice, and other guidelines developed by its committees and by
promoting their adoption and implementation by governments, Codex seeks
to ensure that the world's food supply is sound, wholesome, free from
adulteration, and correctly labeled. In the United States, the United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA); the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS);
and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) manage and carry out U.S.
Codex activities.
As the agency responsible for informing the public of the SPS
standard-setting activities of Codex, FSIS publishes this notice in the
Federal Register annually. Attachment 1 (Sanitary and Phytosanitary
Activities of Codex) sets forth the following information:
1. The SPS standards under consideration or planned for
consideration; and
2. For each SPS standard specified:
a. A description of the consideration or planned consideration of
the standard;
b. Whether the United States is participating or plans to
participate in the consideration of the standard;
c. The agenda for United States participation, if any; and
d. The agency responsible for representing the United States with
respect to the standard.
To obtain Copies of those Standards listed in Attachment 1 that are
under
[[Page 30676]]
consideration by Codex, please contact the Codex delegate or the U.S.
Codex Office. This notice also solicits public comment on those
standards that are currently under consideration or planned for
consideration and recommendations for new standards. The delegate, in
conjunction with the responsible agency, will take the comments
received into account in participating in the consideration of the
standards and in proposing matters to be considered by Codex.
The United States' delegate will facilitate public participation in
the United States Government's activities relating to Codex
Alimentarius. The United States' delegate will maintain a list of
individuals, groups, and organizations that have expressed an interest
in the activities of the Codex committees and will disseminate
information regarding United States' delegation activities to
interested parties. This information will include the current status of
each agenda item; the United States Government's position or
preliminary position on the agenda items; and the time and place of
planning meetings and debriefing meetings following Codex committee
sessions. In addition, the U.S. Codex Office makes much of the same
information available through its web page, https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
Regulations_&_Policies/Codex_Alime ntarius/index.asp. Please visit
the web page or notify the appropriate U.S. delegate or the Office of
U.S. Codex Alimentarius, Room 4861, South Agriculture Building, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-3700, if you would like
to access or receive information about specific committees.
The information provided in Attachment 1 describes the status of
Codex standard-setting activities by the Codex Committees for the time
periods from June 1, 2004 to May 31, 2005, and June 1, 2005 to May 31,
2006. In addition, the following attachments are included:
Attachment 2 List of U.S. Codex Officials (includes U.S. delegates and
alternate delegates)
Attachment 3 Timetable of Codex Sessions (June 2004 through June 2006)
Attachment 4 Definitions for the Purpose of Codex Alimentarius
Attachment 5 Part 1--Uniform Procedure for the Elaboration of Codex
Standards and Related Texts
Part 2--Uniform Accelerated Procedure for the Elaboration of Codex
Standards and Related Texts
Attachment 6 Nature of Codex Standards
Additional Public Notification
Public awareness of all segments of rulemaking and policy
development is important. Consequently, in an effort to ensure that the
public and in particular minorities, women, and persons with
disabilities, are aware of this notice, FSIS will announce it on-line
through the FSIS web page located at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
regulations/2005_Notices_Index/.
FSIS also will make copies of this Federal Register publication
available through the FSIS Constituent Update, which is used to provide
information regarding FSIS policies, procedures, regulations, Federal
Register notices, FSIS public meetings, recalls, and other types of
information that could affect or would be of interest to our
constituents and stakeholders. The update is communicated via Listserv,
a free e-mail subscription service consisting of industry, trade, and
farm groups, consumer interest groups, allied health professionals,
scientific professionals, and other individuals who have requested to
be included. The update also is available on the FSIS web page. Through
Listserv and the Web page, FSIS is able to provide information to a
much broader, more diverse audience.
In addition, FSIS offers an e-mail subscription service which
provides an automatic and customized notification when popular pages
are updated, including Federal Register publications and related
documents. This service is available at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/news_
and_events/email_subscription/ and allows FSIS customers to sign up
for subscription options across eight categories. Options range from
recalls to export information to regulations, directives and notices.
Customers can add or delete subscriptions themselves and have the
option to password protect their account.
Done at Washington, DC on May 24, 2005.
F. Edward Scarbrough,
United States Manager for Codex.
Attachment 1: Sanitary and Phytosanitary Activities of Codex
Codex Alimentarius Commission and Executive Committee
The Codex Alimentarius Commission will hold its Twenty-Eighth
Session July 4-9, 2005 in Rome, Italy. At that time it will consider
procedural matters, and the standards, codes of practice, and related
matters brought to its attention by the general subject committees,
commodity committees, ad hoc Task Forces and member delegations. It
will also consider options to implement recommendations from the review
of Codex committee structure and mandates of Codex committees and task
forces, as well as budgetary and strategic planning issues. At this
Session, the Commission will elect a Chair and three Vice Chairs. The
issue of Codex interaction with other international organizations will
be discussed.
Prior to the Commission meeting, the Executive Committee will have
met at its Fifty-fifth Session on February 9-11, 2005 and its Fifty-
sixth Session on June 30-July 2, 2005. It is composed of the
chairperson, vice-chairpersons, seven members elected from the
Commission, one from each of the following geographic regions: Africa,
Asia, Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, Near East, North
America, and South-West Pacific. In addition, regional coordinators
from the six regional committees attend as observers. It will consider
the Codex Strategic Plan 2008-1013; review the Codex committee
structure and mandate of Codex committees and task forces; review
matters arising from reports of Codex Committees, proposals for new
work, and standards management issues; consider the implementation of
the Joint FAO/WHO Evaluation of the Codex Alimentarius and other FAO
and WHO Work on Food Standards; and review the Trust Fund for the
Participation of Developing Countries and Countries in Transition in
the Work of the Codex Alimentarius.
Responsible Agency: USDA/FSIS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods
The Codex Committee on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods
determines priorities for the consideration of residues of veterinary
drugs in foods and recommends Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for
veterinary drugs. A veterinary drug is defined as any substance applied
or administered to a food producing animal, such as meat or dairy
animals, poultry, fish or bees, for therapeutic, prophylactic or
diagnostic purposes or for modification of physiological functions or
behavior.
A Codex Maximum Limit for Veterinary Drugs (MRLVD) is the maximum
concentration of residue resulting from the use of a veterinary drug
(expressed in mg/kg or ug/kg on a fresh weight basis) that is adopted
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission to be permitted or recognized as
acceptable in or on a food. An MRLVD is based on the Acceptable Daily
Intake (ADI) and indicates the amount of residue in food that is
considered to be without appreciable toxicological hazard. An MRLVD
also takes into account other
[[Page 30677]]
relevant public health risks as well as food technological aspects.
When establishing an MRLVD, consideration is also given to residues
that occur in food of plant origin and/or the environment. Furthermore,
the MRLVD may be reduced to be consistent with good practices in the
use of veterinary drugs and to the extent that practical analytical
methods are available.
Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI): An estimate by the Joint FAO/WHO
Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) of the amount of a
veterinary drug, expressed on a body weight basis, that can be ingested
daily over a lifetime without appreciable health risk (standard man =
60 kg).
The committee met in Arlington, VA (USA), October 25-28, 2004. The
following will be under consideration by the Commission at its 28th
Session in July 2005. The relevant document is ALINORM 5/28/31.
Draft MRLs at Step 8:
Cyhalothrin.
Flumequine.
Neomycin.
Dicyclanil.
Proposed Draft MRLs at Step 5/8:
Imidocarb.
Proposed Draft Code of Practice to Minimize and Contain
Antimicrobial Resistance at Step 5/8.
Proposed Draft MRLs at Step 5:
Flumequine (in black tiger shrimp).
Pirlimycin.
Cypermethrin and alpha-cypermethrin.
Doramectin (in cow's milk).
The Committee continues to work on:
Draft MRLs for Trichlorfon (metrifonate) at step 7.
Proposed Draft MRLs for Ractopamine at step 4.
Proposed Draft Revised Guidelines for the Establishment of
a Regulatory Program for Control of Veterinary Drug Residues in Foods.
Discussion paper on Risk Management Methodologies,
including Risk Assessment Policies in the Codex Committee on Residues
of Veterinary Drugs in Foods.
Proposed Draft Revised Part I, II, III of Guidelines for
the Establishment of a Regulatory Program for the Control of Veterinary
Drug Residues in Foods.
Priority List of Veterinary Drugs Requiring Evaluation or
Reevaluation.
List of Methods of Analysis for Veterinary Drug Residues
and Identification of Routine Methods of Analysis.
Recommendations on Residues of Veterinary Drugs without
ADI/MRL (Prioritization of work).
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA; USDA/FSIS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants
The Codex Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants (CCFAC) (a)
establishes or endorses permitted maximum or guideline levels for
individual food additives, contaminants, and naturally occurring
toxicants in food and animal feed; (b) prepares priority lists of food
additives and contaminants for toxicological evaluation by the Joint
FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA); (c) recommends
specifications of identity and purity for food additives for adoption
by the Commission; (d) considers methods of analysis for food additives
and contaminants; and (e) considers and elaborates standards and codes
for related subjects such as labeling of food additives when sold as
such and food irradiation. The committee met in The Hague, The
Netherlands, April 25-29, 2005. The following matters are under
consideration by the Commission at its 28th Session in July 2005. The
relevant document is ALINORM 5/28/12.
Revised Terms of Reference of the Codex Committee on Food
Additives and Contaminants.
Terms of Reference for the FAO/WHO Joint Expert
Consultation to Conduct a Comprehensive Assessment of Use of Active
Chlorine.
Food Additives
To be considered at Step 8:
General Standard for Food Additive (GSFA): Draft Food
Additive Provisions in Tables 1 and 2.
Amendment to Annex B (Food Category System) of the GSFA
(coconut water).
To be considered at Step 5/8:
General Standard for Food Additives: Proposed Draft Food
Additive Provisions in Tables 1, 2 and 3.
Advisory Specifications for the Identity and Purity of
Food Additives.
Proposed Draft Revisions to the Codex International
Numbering System for Food Additives.
To be considered at Step 5:
Proposed Draft Revised Preamble to the GSFA, including
diagram.
To be considered for Revocation and Discontinuation of work:
General Principles for the Use of Food Additives.
Proposed Amendments to the Codex Procedural Manual related
to the revocation of the General Principles for the Use of Food
Additives.
Proposed Draft and Draft Food Additive Provisions in the
GSFA.
To be considered for New Work:
Revision of Class Names and the International Numbering
System for Food Additives.
The Committee is continuing work on:
General Standard for Food Additives: Draft Food Additive
Provisions (in Tables 1, 2 and 3).
General Standard for Food Additives: Revisions to the
Preamble to clarify relationship between the General Standard and
commodity standards.
International Numbering System.
Specifications for the Identity and Purity of Food
Additives.
Inventory of Processing Aids.
Discussion Paper on Flavoring Agents.
Contaminants
To be considered at Step 8:
Draft Code of Practice for the Prevention and Reduction of
Aflatoxin Contamination in Tree Nuts.
Draft Code of Practice for the Prevention and Reduction of
Inorganic Tin Contamination in Canned Foods.
Draft Maximum Levels for Cadmium in wheat grain, potato,
stem and root vegetables, leafy vegetables, and other vegetables.
To be considered at Step 5/8:
Proposed Amendment to the Preamble of the Codex General
Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Foods (GSCTF).
To be considered at Step 5:
Proposed Draft Maximum Level for Aflatoxin in unprocessed
almonds, hazelnuts and pistachios.
Proposed Draft Maximum Levels for Cadmium in rice,
cephalopod (excluding viscera), and marine bivalve mollusks (excluding
oysters and scallops).
To be considered for Revocation:
List of Maximum Levels for Contaminants and Toxins
Contained in Codex Commodity Standards and Relevant Standards and
Texts.
To be considered for New Work:
Appendix to the Code of Practice for the Prevention and
Reduction of Aflatoxin Contamination in Tree Nuts to address additional
measures for the prevention and reduction of aflatoxins in Brazil nuts.
The Committee is continuing work on:
Maximum levels for aflatoxin in processed almonds,
hazelnuts, and pistachios.
Discussion Paper on Aflatoxin Contamination in Brazil
Nuts.
Proposed draft sampling plan for Aflatoxin contamination
in Almonds, Brazil nuts, Hazelnuts and Pistachios.
[[Page 30678]]
Discussion paper on Deoxynivalenol (DON) Contamination in
Cereals.
Maximum Level for lead in fish.
Proposed Draft Code of Practice for Source Directed
Measures to Reduce Dioxin and Dioxin-like PCB Contamination in Foods.
Discussion paper with proposals for maximum levels for 3-
monochloropropanediol in acid-hydrolyzed vegetable protein (acid-HVP)
and acid-HVP containing foods.
Discussion paper on acrylamide, including a project paper
for new work and an outline of a proposed draft code of practice.
Draft Revised Guideline Levels for Radionuclides in Foods
Following Accidental Nuclear Contamination for Use in International
Trade, Including Guideline Levels for Long-Term Use.
Discussion paper on polyaromatic hydrocarbons, including a
project paper for new work and an outline of a proposed draft code of
practice.
Discussion paper on methylmercury in fish.
Discussion paper on Code of Practice for the Prevention
and Reduction of Ochratoxin A (OTA) Contamination in Coffee and Cocoa.
Discussion paper on Maximum level of Ochratoxin A in Wine.
General Issues
Priority List of Food Additives, Contaminants and
Naturally Occurring Toxicants Proposed for Evaluation by JECFA.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues
The Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues recommends to the Codex
Alimentarius Commission establishment of maximum limits for pesticide
residues for specific food items or in groups of food. A Codex Maximum
Residue Limit for Pesticide (MRLP) is the maximum concentration of a
pesticide residue (expressed as mg/kg), recommended by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission to be legally permitted in or on food
commodities and animal feeds. Foods derived from commodities that
comply with the respective MRLPs are intended to be toxicologically
acceptable, that is, consideration of the various dietary residue
intake estimates and determinations both at the national and
international level in comparison with the ADI,* should
indicate that foods complying with Codex MRLPs are safe for human
consumption.
Codex MRLPs are primarily intended to apply in international trade
and are derived from reviews conducted by the Joint Meeting on
Pesticide Residues (JMPR) following:
(a) Review of residue data from supervised trials and supervised
uses including those reflecting national good agricultural practices
(GAP). Data from supervised trials conducted at the highest nationally
recommended, authorized, or registered uses are included in the review.
In order to accommodate variations in national pest control
requirements, Codex MRLPs take into account the higher levels shown to
arise in such supervised trials, which are considered to represent
effective pest control practices, and
(b) Toxicological assessment of the pesticide and its residue.
The committee met in The Hague, The Netherlands, April 18-23, 2005.
The following items will be considered by the Commission at its 28th
Session in July 2005. The relevant document is ALINORM 05/28/24.
To be considered at Step 8:
Draft and Draft Revised Maximum Residue Limits.
To be considered at Step 8(I):
Bifenazate.
Fludioxonil.
Trifloxystrobin.
To be considered at Step 5/8:
Proposed Draft and Proposed Draft Revised Maximum Residue
Limits including Proposed Draft MRLs for Spices.
Proposed Draft Guidelines for the Use of Mass Spectrometry
(MS) for Identification, Confirmation and Quantitative Determination of
Residues.
Proposed New Food Classification Codes for Commodities
with Adopted MRLs.
To be considered at Step 5:
Proposed Draft and Proposed Draft Revised Maximum Residue
Limits including Proposed Draft MRLs for Dried Chili Peppers.
Proposed Draft Guidelines on Estimation of Uncertainty of
Results.
Proposed Draft Risk Analysis Principles Applied by the
Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues.
To be considered for Revocation:
Codex CLX-Ds.
The committee is continuing work on:
Pilot Project for the examination of national MRLs as
Interim Codex MRLs for safer replacement pesticides.
Revision of the List of Recommended Methods of Analysis
for Pesticide Residues.
Criteria for Prioritization Process to Recommend Compounds
for Evaluation by JMPR.
Revision of the Codex Priority List of Pesticides for
review by JMPR.
MRLs for Processed or Ready-to-Eat Foods.
*Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of a chemical is the daily intake
which, during an entire lifetime, appears to be without appreciable
risk to the health of the consumer on the basis of all the known
facts at the time of the evaluation of the chemical by the Joint
FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues. It is expressed in milligrams
of the chemical per kilogram of body weight.
Responsible Agency: EPA, USDA/AMS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling
The Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling:
(a) Defines the criteria appropriate to Codex Methods of Analysis
and Sampling;
(b) Serves as a coordinating body for Codex with other
international groups working in methods of analysis and sampling and
quality assurance systems for laboratories;
(c) Specifies, on the basis of final recommendations submitted to
it by the other bodies referred to in (b) above, Reference Methods of
Analysis and Sampling appropriate to Codex Standards which are
generally applicable to a number of foods;
(d) Considers, amends, if necessary, and endorses, as appropriate,
methods of analysis and sampling proposed by Codex (Commodity)
Committees, except that methods of analysis and sampling for residues
of pesticides or veterinary drugs in food, the assessment of
microbiological quality and safety in food, and the assessment of
specifications for food additives do not fall within the terms of
reference of this Committee;
(e) Elaborates sampling plans and procedures, as may be required;
(f) Considers specific sampling and analysis problems submitted to
it by the Commission or any of its Committees; and
(g) Defines procedures, protocols, guidelines or related texts for
the assessment of food laboratory proficiency, as well as quality
assurance systems for laboratories.
The 26th Session of the Committee met in Budapest, Hungary, on
April 4-8, 2005. The relevant document is ALINORM 05/28/23. The
following will be considered by the Commission at its 28th Session in
July 2005.
To be considered at Step 5:
Proposed Draft Guidelines for Evaluating Acceptable
Methods of Analysis.
The Committee will continue work on:
Criteria for Evaluating Acceptable Methods of Analysis.
[[Page 30679]]
Proposed Draft Guidelines for Settling of Disputes on
Analytical (test) Results.
Consideration of the Fitness-For-Purpose Approach to
Evaluating Methods of Analysis.
Further Review of the Analytical Terminology for Codex Use
in the Procedural Manual.
Endorsement of Methods of Analysis and Sampling Provisions
in Codex Standards.
Criteria for Methods of Analysis for the Detection and
Identification of Foods derived from Biotechnology
Methods of Analysis for the determination of dioxins and
PCBs.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA; USDA/MRP.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Food Import and Export Inspection and Certification
Systems
The Codex Committee on Food Import and Export Inspection and
Certification Systems is charged with developing principles and
guidelines for food import and export inspection and certification
systems to protect consumers and to facilitate trade. Additionally, the
Committee develops principles and guidelines for the application of
measures by competent authorities to provide assurance that foods
comply with essential requirements, especially statutory health
requirements. This encompasses work on: Equivalence of food inspection
systems including equivalence agreements, processes and procedures to
ensure that sanitary measures are implemented; guidelines on food
import control systems; and guidelines on food product certification
and information exchange. The development of guidelines for the
appropriate utilization of quality assurance systems to ensure that
foodstuffs conform to requirements and to facilitate trade also are
included in the Committee's terms of reference. The reference document
is ALINORM 05/28/30. The committee met in Melbourne, Australia, on
December 6-10, 2004. The following will be considered for adoption by
the Commission at its 28thSession in July 2005.
To be considered at step 5/8:
Draft Principles for Electronic Certification.
The committee is continuing work on:
Proposed Draft Appendices to the Guidelines on the
Judgment of Equivalence of Sanitary Measures Associated with Food
Inspection and Certification.
(a) Determining an ``objective basis of comparison''
(b) Details on the process of determining equivalence.
(c) Documentation for evaluation of submissions of requests for
equivalence determinations.
Proposed Draft Guidelines for Risk-based Inspection of
Imported Foods.
New work:
Develop principles for product tracing/traceability within
the context of food inspection and certification systems.
Revise the Codex Guidelines for Generic Official
Certificate Formats and the Production and Issuance of Certification.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA; USDA/FSIS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on General Principles
The Codex Committee on General Principles deals with procedure and
general matters as are referred to it by the Codex Alimentarius
Commission. The 21st Session addressed issues related to decisions made
by the Commission regarding the FAO/WHO Codex Evaluation. The 22nd
Session which met on April 11-15, 2005 in Paris, France, considered the
regular work of the Committee. The relevant documents are ALINORM 05/
28/33 and ALINORM 05/28/33A. Matters to be considered for adoption by
the 28th Commission in July 2005:
To be considered at Step 8:
Draft Risk Analysis Principles Applied by the Committee on
Food Additives and Contaminants (CCFAC).
Draft CCFAC Policy for Exposure Assessment.
For consideration by the Commission:
Amendments to the Rules of Procedure:
Proposed amendments concerning the enlargement of the
Executive Committee, the functions of the Executive Committee and
matters related to budget and expenses.
Proposed Amendments to Rule VIII.5--Observers.
Proposed Amendment on the Right to Address the Chair.
Amendments to the Procedure Manual:
Draft Revised Criteria for the Establishment of Work
Priorities.
Draft Guidelines on Physical Working Groups.
Draft Guidelines on Electronic Working Groups.
Draft Revised Principles concerning the Participation of
International Non-Governmental Organizations in the Work of the Codex
Alimentarius Commission.
Proposed Amendments to the Procedural Manual to eliminate
the acceptance procedures for Codex Standards.
Draft Guidelines for Cooperation with International
Intergovernmental Organizations.
The Committee continued work on:
Proposed Draft Working Principles for Risk Analysis for
Food Safety (Guidance to National Governments).
Proposed amendments to the Rules of Procedure: Duration of
the terms of the Members of the Executive Committee.
Possible reorganization of the structure, content and
presentation of the Procedural Manual.
Changes in the Elaboration Procedures.
Clarification of the term ``interim'' as used for the
adoption of Codex standards at Step 8.
Possible definitions of ``science-based'' and ``risk-
based''.
Management of the work in the Codex Committee on Food
Hygiene.
Responsible Agency: USDA/FSIS, FDA/CFSAN.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Food Labelling
The Codex Committee on Food Labelling is responsible for drafting
provisions on labelling issues assigned by the Codex Alimentarius
Commission. The reference document is ALINORM 04/27/22. The Committee
held its Thirty-third Session in Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, on May 9-13,
2005. It considered the following items:
Guidelines for the Production, Processing, Labelling and
Marketing of Organically Produced Foods Proposed Revised Sections:
Annex 2--Tables 3 and 4, Revision to Table 1 (Natural Sodium Nitrate).
Draft Amendment to the General Standard for the Labelling
of Prepackaged Foods--(Draft Recommendations for the Labelling of Foods
Obtained through Certain Techniques of Genetic Modification/Genetic
Engineering) Section 2. (Definitions).
Proposed Draft Guidelines for the Labelling of Food and
food Ingredients obtained through certain Techniques of Genetic
Modification/Genetic Engineering: Labelling Provisions.
Proposed Draft Amendment to the General Standard for the
Labelling of Prepackaged Foods: Quantitative Declaration of
Ingredients.
Country of Origin Labelling.
Discussion paper on Advertising.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA; USDA/FSIS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
[[Page 30680]]
Codex Committee on Food Hygiene
The Codex Committee on Food Hygiene has four primary
responsibilities. First, to draft basic provisions on food hygiene
applicable to all food. These provisions normally take the form of
Codes of Hygienic Practice for a specific commodity (e.g. bottled
water) or group of commodities (e.g., milk and milk products). Second,
to suggest and prioritize areas where there is a need for
microbiological risk assessment at the international level and to
consider microbiological risk management matters in relation to food
hygiene and in relation to the risk assessment activities of FAO and
WHO. Third, to consider, amend if necessary, and endorse food hygiene
provisions that are incorporated into specific Codex commodity
standards by the Codex commodity committees. Fourth, to provide such
other general guidance to the Commission on matters relating to food
hygiene as may be necessary. The following items will be considered by
the Codex Alimentarius Commission at its 28th Session in Rome, Italy,
July 4-9, 2005. The relevant document is ALINORM 05/28/13.
To be considered at Step 5:
Proposed Draft Guidelines on the Application of the
General Principles of Food Hygiene to the Control of Listeria
monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Foods.
Proposed Draft Code of Hygienic Practice for Eggs and Egg
Products.
Proposed Draft Principles and Guidelines for the Conduct
of Microbiological Risk Management.
The committee continues to work on:
Proposed Draft Guidelines for Validation of Food Hygienic
Control Measures.
Proposed Draft Code of Hygienic Practice for Powdered
Formulae for Infants and Children.
Endorsement of Hygiene Provisions in Codex Standards and
Codes of Practice.
Annexes to the step 5 documents.
Proposals/risk profiles:
Guidelines for the Application of the General Principles
of Food Hygiene to the Risk-Based Control of Enterohemorrhagic E. coli
in Ground Beef and Fermented Sausages.
Guidelines for the Application of the General Principles
of Food Hygiene to the Risk-Based Control of Salmonella spp. in Broiler
Chickens.
Guidelines for Risk Management Options for Campylobacter
in Broiler Chickens.
Vibrio spp. in Seafood.
Viruses in Food.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA; FSIS/USDA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Fresh Fruits and Vegetables
The Codex Committee on Fresh Fruits and Vegetables is responsible
for elaborating world-wide standards and codes of practice for fresh
fruits and vegetables. The Committee met in Mexico City, Mexico, on May
16-20, 2005. At the session they discussed the following items:
Draft Standard for Tomatoes at Step 7.
Draft Standard for Table Grapes retained at Step 7.
Proposed Draft Standard for Rambutan at Step 3.
Proposed Draft Standard for Apples at Step 3.
Section 2.1.1 (Maturity Requirements) and Annex on Small-
berry Varieties (Section 3.1) (draft Codex Standard for Table Grapes).
Guidelines for the Quality Control of Fresh Fruits and
Vegetables.
Standard Layout for Codex Standards for Fresh Fruits and
Vegetables.
Priority List.
Responsible Agency: USDA/AMS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses
The Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses
(CCNFSDU) is responsible for studying nutritional problems referred by
the Codex Alimentarius Commission. The Committee also drafts general
provisions, as appropriate, on nutritional aspects of all foods and
develops standards, guidelines, or related texts for foods for special
dietary uses. The committee met in Bonn, Germany, November 1-4, 2004.
The relevant document is ALINORM 05/28/26. The following items will be
considered by the 28th Session of the Commission in June 2005.
To be adopted at Step 8:
Draft Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Food Supplements.
The Committee continues work on:
Draft Revised Standard for Gluten-Free Foods at Step 7.
Draft Revised Standard for Processed Cereal-Based.Foods
for Infants and Young Children at Step 6.
Draft Revised Standard for Infant Formula and Formulas for
Special Medical Purposes Intended for Infants at Steps 3 (Section A)
and 6 (Section B).
Guidelines for Use of Nutrition Claims Draft Table of
Conditions for Nutrient Content Claims (Part B containing Provisions on
Dietary Fibre) at Step 6.
Proposed Draft Revision of the Advisory Lists of Nutrient
Compounds for Use in Foods for Special Dietary Uses Intended for Use by
Infants and Young Children.
Proposed Draft Recommendations on the Scientific Basis of
Health Claims.
Discussion Paper on the Application of Risk Analysis to
the Work of the CCNFSDU.
Discussion Paper on Proposals for Additional or Revised
Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs).
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA; FNS/USDA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery Products
The Fish and Fishery Products Committee is responsible for
elaborating standards for fresh, frozen and otherwise processed fish,
crustaceans and mollusks. The committee met in Capetown, South Africa,
February 28-March 4, 2005. The following will be considered by the 28th
Session of the Commission when it meets in July 2005. The relevant
document is ALINORM 05/28/18.
To be considered at Step 8:
Draft Code of Practice for Fish and Fishery Products
(Aquaculture).
Draft Amendment to the Standard for Salted Fish and Dried
Salted Fish.
To be considered at Step 5/8:
Proposed Draft Code of Practice for Fish and Fishery
Products (Shrimps and Prawns; Cephalopods; Transport; Retail; and
relevant Definitions).
To be considered at Step 5:
Proposed Draft Standard for Sturgeon Caviar New work:
Revision of the Procedure for the Inclusion of Species.
Amendment of the Standard for Canned Sardines and Sardine-
Type Products.
The Committee continues work on the following:
Proposed Draft Standard for Live and Processed Bivalve
Mollusks.
Proposed Draft Standard for Smoked Fish.
Proposed Draft Standard for Quick Frozen Scallop Adductor
Muscle Meat.
Proposed Draft Code of Practice on the Processing of
Scallop Meat.
Proposed Draft Code of Practice for Fish and Fishery
Products (other sections).
Proposed Draft Amendment of the Standard for Canned
Sardines and Sardine-Type Products (Clupea bentincki).
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA; USDC/NOAA/NMFS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
[[Page 30681]]
Codex Committee on Milk and Milk Products
The Codex Committee on Milk and Milk Products is responsible for
establishing international codes and standards for milk and milk
products. The Committee held its 6th Session in Auckland, NZ on April
26-30, 2004. The relevant document is ALINORM 04/27/11.
For discussion at the 28th Session of the Codex Alimentarius
Commission in July 2005.
Proposal for a new standard for Parmesan Cheese At its 7th
Session, the Committee will continue work on the following:
At Step 6:
Draft Standard for a Blend of Evaporated Skimmed Milk and
Vegetable Fat.
Draft Standard for a Blend of Skimmed Milk and Vegetable
Fat in Powdered Form.
Draft Standard for a Blend of Sweetened Condensed Skimmed
Milk and Vegetable Fat.
Draft Revised Standard for Whey Cheese.
Draft Revised Standards for Cheddar (C-1) and Danbo (C-3).
Other work of the committee:
Proposed Draft Revised Standards for Individual Cheeses at
Step 4.
Proposed Template for Fermented Milk Drinks Provisions.
Proposed Draft Model Export Certificate for Milk and Milk
Products.
Methods of Analysis and Sampling for Milk Products.
Proposed Draft Revised Standard for Processed Cheese.
Proposed Draft Revised Standard for Dairy Spreads.
Discussion paper on Proposed Revision of the Codex
Standard for Extra Hard Grating Cheese.
Discussion paper on the Issue of Naming Non-standardized
Dairy Products.
Responsible Agency: USDA/AMS; HHS/FDA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Fats and Oils
The Codex Committee on Fats and Oils is responsible for elaborating
standards for fats and oils of animal, vegetable, and marine origin.
The committee met in London, U.K., February 21-25, 2005. The relevant
document is 05/28/17. The following will be considered by the
Commission at its July 2005 session.
To be considered at Step 5/8:
Proposed Draft Amendments to the Standard for Named
Vegetable Oils: Sesameseed Oil.
To be considered at Step 5:
Proposed Draft Amendments to the Standard for Named
Vegetable Oils: Rice Bran Oil.
To be considered at Step 5 of the Accelerated Procedure:
Proposed Draft Revised Table 1 of the Recommended
International Code of Practice for the Storage and Transport of Edible
Fats and Oils in Bulk.
New Work:
Amendment of the Standard for Named Vegetable Oils.
Mid-oleic sunflowerseed oil.
Mid-oleic acid soya bean oil.
Low linolenic acid soya bean oil.
Unbleached palm oil: total carotenoids.
The Committee continues work on:
Draft Standard for Fat Spreads and Blended Spreads: Food
additives.
Draft List and Proposed Draft List of Acceptable Previous
Cargoes.
Proposed Draft Amendment to the Standard for Olive Oil:
Linolenic Acid content.
Criteria for the Revision of Named Vegetable oils.
Consideration of ISO proposal to amend the nomenclature of
oils.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA; USDA/ARS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Processed Fruits and Vegetables
The Codex Committee on Processed Fruits and Vegetables is
responsible for elaborating standards for Processed Fruits and
Vegetables. After having been adjourned sine die, the Committee
reconvened in Washington, DC, in March 1998 to begin work revising the
standards. The Committee held its most recent session on September 27
October 1, 2004. The relevant document is ALINORM 05/28/27.
To be considered at Step 5:
Processed Tomato Concentrates.
Preserved (Canned) Tomatoes.
Certain Canned Citrus Fruits.
The committee is continuing work on:
Draft Codex Standard for Pickled Fruits and Vegetables.
Proposed Draft Codex Standards for:
Jams, Jellies and Marmalades.
Certain Canned Vegetables and Guidelines for Packing Media
for Canned Vegetables.
Other work:
Methods of Analysis for Processed Fruits and Vegetables.
Priority List for the Standardization of Processed Fruits
and Vegetables.
Discontinued work in this committee:
Proposed Draft Standard for Soy Sauce.
Responsible Agency: USDA/AMS; HHS/FDA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Meat Hygiene
The 24th Session of the Commission decided to reactivate the Codex
Committee on Meat Hygiene with New Zealand as Host Government. The
Terms of Reference were amended to reflect the inclusion of poultry in
its mandate. The Committee completed its work at its 11th Session and
requested the Commission that it be adjourned sine die. The relevant
document is ALINORM 05/28/16.
To be considered at Step 8:
Draft Code of Hygienic Practice for Meat.
Responsible Agency: USDA/FSIS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Committee on Cereals, Pulses, and Legumes
The 26th Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission adopted the
Proposed Draft Standard for Instant Noodles at Step 5, on the
recommendation of the Coordinating Committee for Asia, and advanced it
to Step 6 for consideration by the Committee on Cereals, Pulses and
Legumes by correspondence. The United States, as host government, has
circulated the Draft Standard for two rounds of comments. Consideration
of the additives provisions will take place in the Codex Committee on
Food Additives and Contaminants.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA; USDA/GIPSA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Certain Codex Commodity Committees
Several Codex Alimentarius Commodity Committees have adjourned sine
die. The following Committees fall into this category:
Cocoa Products and Chocolate.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Natural Mineral Water.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Sugars.
Responsible Agency: USDA/ARS; HHS/FDA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Vegetable Proteins.
Responsible Agency: USDA/ARS; HHS/FDA.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Ad Hoc Intergovernmental Task Force on Animal Feeding
The Commission at its 23rd Session established the Ad Hoc
Intergovernmental Task Force on Animal Feeding to develop guidelines or
standards as appropriate on good animal feeding practices. The Revised
[[Page 30682]]
Draft Code of Practice for Good Animal Feeding was held at Step 8 by
the Commission at its 26th Session in June 2003, with the exception
that the definition of ``feed additive'' and paragraphs 11, 12, and 13
were advanced to step 6. The Task Force held its 5th Session on May 17-
19, 2004 and discussed:
Revised Draft Code of Practice for Good Animal Feeding
(definition of ``feed additive'' and paragraphs 11, 12, and 13).
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA; USDA/APHIS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Ad Hoc Intergovernmental Task Force on Fruit and Vegetable Juices
The Commission at its 23rd Session established this Task Force to
revise and consolidate the existing Codex standards and guidelines for
fruit and vegetable juices and related products, giving preference to
general standards. These standards were originally developed by the
Joint UNECE/Codex Group of Experts on the Standardization of Fruit
Juices which had been abolished by its parent organizations. The Task
Force held its fourth and final session in Fortaleza, Brazil, on
October 11-15, 2004. The Task Force completed the work assigned to the
Task Force in its Terms of Reference.
For Adoption at Step 8:
Draft Codex General Standard for Fruit Juices and Nectars.
Draft Minimum Brix Level for Reconstituted Juice and
Reconstituted Pure and Minimum Juice and/or Pure Content for Fruit
Nectars (%v/v)--grapes, guava, mandarine/tangerine, mango, passion
fruit and tamarind (Indian date) juices/nectars.
For Adoption at Step 5/8:
Proposed Draft Minimum Brix Level for Reconstituted Juice
and Reconstituted Pure and Minimum Juice and/or Pur[eacute]e Content
for Fruit nectars (%v/v)--orange, lemon, lime, and pineapple juices/
nectars.
Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA; USDA/AMS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
FAO/WHO Regional Coordinating Committees
The Codex Alimentarius Commission is made up of an Executive
Committee, as well as approximately 30 subsidiary bodies. Included in
these subsidiary bodies are coordinating committees for groups of
countries located in proximity to each other who share common concerns.
There are currently six Regional Coordinating Committees:
Coordinating Committee for Africa.
Coordinating Committee for Asia.
Coordinating Committee for Europe.
Coordinating Committee for Latin America and the
Caribbean.
Coordinating Committee for the Near East.
Coordinating Committee for North America and the South-
West Pacific.
The United States participates as an active member of the
Coordinating Committee for North America and the South-West Pacific,
and is informed of the other coordinating committees through meeting
documents, final reports, and representation at meetings. Each regional
committee:
Defines the problems and needs of the region concerning
food standards and food control;
Promotes within the committee contacts for the mutual
exchange of information on proposed regulatory initiatives and problems
arising from food control and stimulates the strengthening of food
control infrastructures;
Recommends to the Commission the development of world-wide
standards for products of interest to the region, including products
considered by the committee to have an international market potential
in the future; and
Serves a general coordinating role for the region and
performs such other functions as may be entrusted to it by the
Commission.
Codex Coordinating Committee for North America and the South-West
Pacific
The Coordinating Committee is responsible for defining problems and
needs concerning food standards and food control of all Codex member
countries of the region. Items coming before the Commission in July
include the following. The committee met in Apia, Samoa, on October 19-
22, 2004. The relevant document is ALINORM 05/28/32.
Recommendation that Samoa be reappointed as Regional
Coordinator.
Support the development of a new Standard for Parmesan
cheese and adopt the amendment of the Codex Standard for Canned
Sardines and Sardine-Type Products.
Items on the agenda for the next meeting may include:
Codex working documents of special interest to regional
member states.
Joint FAO/WHO Evaluation of the Codex Alimentarius and
other FAO and WHO Work on Food Standards.
Strategic Plan for the Coordinating Committee for North
America and the Southwest Pacific.
Trust Fund for the participation of Developing Countries
in Codex.
Responsible Agency: USDA/FSIS.
U.S. Participation: Yes.
Codex Coordinating Committee for Asia
The Coordinating Committee met in Jeju-Do, Republic of Korea on
September 7-10, 2004. The relevant document is ALINORM--5/15.
To be considered at Step 5:
Proposed Draft Standard for Ginseng Products.
New work:
Refrigerated, Non-fermented Soybean Products.
Attachment 2--U.S. Codex Alimentarius Officials Codex Committee
Chairpersons
Codex Committee on Food Hygiene
Dr. Karen Hulebak, Chief Scientist, Office of Public Health
Science, Food Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 3130, South Building,
Washington, DC 20250-3700, Phone: (202) 720-5735, Fax: (202) 720-2980.
E-mail: karen.hulebak@fsis.usda.gov.
Codex Committee on Processed Fruits and Vegetables
Mr. David L. Priester, Head, Standardization Section, AMS Fruit &
Vegetable Programs, Fresh Products Branch, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Room 1661, South Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-0240. Phone: (202) 720-2185. Fax: (202) 720-8871.
E-mail: david.priester@usda.gov.
Codex Committee on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods
Dr. Stephen F. Sundlof, Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine,
Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Place (HFV-1), Rockville,
MD 20855, Phone: (301) 827-2950, Fax: (301) 827-8401, E-mail:
ssundlof@cvm.fda.gov.
Codex Committee on Cereals, Pulses and Legumes (Adjourned sine die)
Mr. Steven N. Tanner, Director, Technical Services Division, Grain
Inspection, Packers & Stockyards Administration, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 10383 N. Executive Hills Boulevard, Kansas City, MO 64153-
1394, Phone: (816) 891-0401, Fax: (816) 891-0478, E-mail:
stanner@tsd.fgiskc.usda.gov.
[[Page 30683]]
Listing of U.S. Delegates and Alternates Worldwide General Subject
Codex Committees
Codex Committee on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods (Host
Government--United States)
U.S. Delegate
Dr. Steven D. Vaughn, Director, Office of New Animal Drug
Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Place, Rockville, MD 20855, Phone: (301)
827-1796, Fax: (301) 594-2297, E-mail: SVaughn@cvm.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Dr. Alice Thaler, Staff Director, Animal and Egg Production Food
Safety Staff, Food Safety and Inspection Service, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250, Phone: (202) 690-2683, Fax: (202)
720-8213, E-mail: alice.thaler@fsis.usda.gov.
Codex Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants (Host Government--
The Netherlands)
U.S. Delegate
Dr. Terry C. Troxell, Director, Office of Plant and Dairy Foods and
Beverages, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-300), Food
and Drug Administration, Harvey W. Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint
Branch Parkway, College Park, MD 20740-3835, Phone: (301) 436-1700,
Fax: (301) 436-2632, E-mail: Terry.Troxell@cfsan.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Dr. Dennis M. Keefe, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug
Administration, Harvey W. Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint Branch
Parkway, College Park, MD 20740-3835, Phone: (301) 436-1284, Fax: (301)
436-2972, E-mail: dennis.keefe@cfsan.fda.gov.
Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (Host Government--The
Netherlands)
U.S. Delegate
Lois Rossi, Director of Registration Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ariel Rios Building,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, Phone: (703) 305-
5035, Fax: (703) 305-5147, E-mail: Rossi.Lois@epamail.epa,gov.
Alternate Delegate
Dr. Robert Epstein, Associate Deputy Administrator, Science and
Technology, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, P.O. Box 96456, Room 3522S, Mail Stop 0222, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20090, Phone (202) 720-2158,
Fax: (202) 720-1484, E-mail: Robert.Epstein@usda.gov.
Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling (Host Government--
Hungary)
U.S. Delegate
Dr. Gregory Diachenko, Director, Division of Chemistry Research and
Environmental Review, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), Food and Drug Administration
(HFS-245), Harvey W. Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint Branch Parkway,
College Park, MD 20740-3835, Phone (301) 436-1898, Fax: (301) 436-2364,
E-mail: Gregory.Diachenko@cfsan.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Mr. Donald C. Kendall, Technical Services Division, Grain,
Inspection, Packers & Stockyards Administration, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 10383 N. Ambassador Drive, Kansas City, MO 64153-1394,
Phone: (816) 891-0463, Fax: (816) 891-0478, E-mail:
Donald.C.Kendall@usda.gov.
Codex Committee on Food Import and Export Inspection and Certification
Systems (Host Government--Australia)
U.S. Delegate
Dr. Catherine Carnevale, Director, Office of Constituent
Operations, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug
Administration (HFS-550), Harvey W. Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint
Branch Parkway, College Park, MD 20740-3835, Phone: (301) 436-2380,
Fax: (301) 436-2612, E-mail: Catherine.Carnevale@cfsan.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Karen Stuck, Chief, International Policy Staff, Food Safety and
Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Room 2137, South
Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-3700,
Phone: (202) 720-3470, Fax: (202) 720-7990, E-mail:
Karen.Stuck@fsis.usda.gov.
Codex Committee on General Principles (Host Government--France)
U.S.Delegate
Note: A member of the Steering Committee heads the delegation to
meetings of the General Principles Committee.
Codex Committee on Food Labeling (Host Government--Canada)
U.S. Delegate
Leslye Fraser, J.D., Director, Office of Regulations and Policy,
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, FDA, 5100 Paint Branch
Parkway (HFS-004), College Park, MD 20740, Phone: (301) 436-2378, Fax:
(301) 436-2637, E-mail: leslye.fraser@fda.hhs.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Ms. Danielle Schor, Chief of Staff, Office of the Administrator,
Food Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-1400, Phone: (202)
720-6618, Fax: (202) 720-7771, E-mail: danielle.schor@fsis.usda.gov.
Codex Committee on Food Hygiene (Host Government--United States)
U.S. Delegate
Dr. Robert L. Buchanan, Director, Office of Science, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration (HFS-
006), Harvey W. Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint Branch Parkway,
College Park, MD 20740-3835, Phone: (301) 436-2369, Fax: (301) 436-
2642, E-mail: Robert.Buchanan@cfsan.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegates
Dr. Daniel Engeljohn, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
Policy, Program, and Employee Development, Room 3149, South Building,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250, Phone: (202) 205-0495, Fax: (202) 401-1760, E-
mail: Daniel.engeljohn@fsis.usda.gov.
Dr. Rebecca Buckner, Consumer Safety Officer, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, Room 3B-
0033 Harvey Wiley Building, 5100 Paint Branch Parkway, College Park, MD
20740, Phone: (301) 436-1486, Fax: (301) 436-2632, E-mail:
Rebecca.Buckner@cfsan.fda.gov.
Codex Committee on Nutrition and Food for Special Dietary Uses (Host
Government--Germany) U.S. Delegate
Barbara O. Schneeman, PhD, Director, Office of Nutritional
Products, Labeling and Dietary Supplements, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition, FDA, 5100 Paint Branch Highway, College Park, MD
20740, Tel: (301) 436-2373, Fax: (301) 436-2636, E-mail:
Barbara.Schneeman@cfsan.fda.gov.
[[Page 30684]]
Alternate Delegate
Patricia McKinney, Senior Program Analyst, Office of Analysis,
Nutrition Service, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center
Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria, VA 22302, Tel: (703) 305-2126, Fax: (703)
305-2576, E-mail: Pat.Mckinney@fns.usda.gov.
Worldwide Commodity Codex Committees Codex Committee on Fresh Fruits
and Vegetables (Host Government--Mexico)
U.S. Delegate
Dorian LaFond, International Standards Coordinator, Fruit and
Vegetables Program, Agricultural Marketing Service, Room 2086, South
Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250, Phone
(202) 690-4944, Fax: (202) 720-4722, E-mail: dorian.lafond@usda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Vacant.
Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery Products (Host Government--Norway)
U.S. Delegate
Mr. Philip C. Spiller, Director, Office of Seafood, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration (HFS-400),
Harvey W. Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint Branch Parkway, College
Park, MD 20740-3835, Phone: (301) 436-2300, Fax: (301) 436-2599, E-
mail: Philip.Spiller@cfsan.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Mr. Richard V. Cano, Acting Director, National Seafood Inspection
Program, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1315 East-West Highway,
Silver Spring, MD 20910, Phone: (301) 713-2355, Fax: (301) 713-1081, E-
mail: richard.cano@noaa.gov.
Codex Committee on Cereals, Pulses and Legumes (Host Government--United
States)
U.S. Delegate
Mr. Charles W. Cooper, Director, International Activities Staff,
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug
Administration (HFS-585), Harvey W. Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint
Branch Parkway, College Park, MD 20740-3835, Phone: (301) 436-1714,
Fax: (301) 436-2612, E-mail: Charles.Cooper@cfsan.fda.gov.
Alternate Delegate
Mr. David Shipman, Deputy Administrator, Federal Grain Inspection
Division, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Room 1661, South Building, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250, Phone: (202) 720-9170, Fax: (202)
205-9237, E-mail: dshipman@gipsadc.usda.gov.
Codex Committee on Milk and Milk Products (Host Government--New
Zealand)
U.S. Delegate
Mr. Duane Spomer, Associate Deputy Administrator for Standards and
Grading, Dairy Programs, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Room 2746, South Building, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250, Phone: (202) 720-3171, Fax: (202)
720-2643, E-mail: duane.spomer@usda.gov.
Al