Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Construction of a Proposed Disposal Site for Dredged material in the Middle Branch of the Patapsco River, at Masonville, Baltimore City/Application for a Corps Section 10/404 Individual Permit, 30421-30422 [05-10543]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Notices
be considered by the panel prior to the
meeting, statements must be submitted
electronically no later than June 21,
2005. Any private citizen is permitted to
speak at the Beneficiary Advisory Panel
meeting, time permitting. One hour has
been reserved for public comments, and
speaking times will be assigned on a
first-come, first-served basis. The
amount of time allocated to a speaker
will not exceed five minutes. Private
citizens wishing to speak at the meeting
may sign up at the meeting on a firstcome, first-served basis.
Dated: May 20, 2005.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05–10490 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement
Titled: Alexandria, LA, to the Gulf of
Mexico Flood Control Improvements in
the Chatlan Lake Canal Basin
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, New Orleans District, is
initiating this study authorized by a July
23, 1997 resolution of the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the
U.S. House of Representatives. The
resolution reads: ‘‘Resolved by the
Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure of the U.S. House of
Representatives, that the Secretary of
the Army is required to review the
report of the Chief of Engineers on the
Mississippi River and Tributaries
Project, published as House Document
308, Eighty-eighth Congress, Second
Session, and other pertinent reports, to
determine whether modifications of the
recommendations contained therein are
advisable at the present time in the
interest of flood control, navigation,
wetlands, conservation restoration,
wildlife habitat, commercial and
recreational fishing, saltwater intrusion,
freshwater and sediment diversion, and
other purposes in the area drained by
the West Atchafalaya Basin Protection
Levee, from Alexandria, Louisiana, to
the Gulf of Mexico.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions concerning the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
should be addressed to Mr. Nathan
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:11 May 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Dayan at U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
PM–RS, P.O. Box 60267, New Orleans,
LA 70160–0267, phone (504) 862–2530,
fax number (504) 862–2572 or by e-mail
at Nathan.S.Dayan@mvn02.
usace.army.mil.
The
purpose of this analysis is to address the
feasibility of a Federal project to reduce
flooding problems and other water
resources problems and needs in the
Alexandria, LA area. Economic and
environmental analysis would be used
to determine the most practical plan,
which would provide for the greatest
overall public benefit.
1. Proposed Action. The proposed
action would include the flood control
improvements in the Chatlin lake canal
basin in the Alexandria, LA area. The
plan includes the enlargement of the
upper reach (∼14 miles) of the Chatlin
Lake canal, south of the city of
Alexandria, and the construction of a
new diversion canal (∼5 miles) between
the Chatlin Lake canal and the Red
River south of John H. Overton lock and
dam. This plan would be considered
with a gravity drainage structure
through the south bank of the Red River
levee. The material dredged for the
construction and maintenance of the
channels would be used for wetlands
restoration and construction, to the
maximum extent practicable.
2. Alternatives. Alternatives
recommended for consideration
presently include but not limited to:
The construction of a shorter channel
off of Chatlin Lake canal to the Red
River above the lock and dam with a
pump station, a green tree reservoir off
of Chatlin Lake canal, improving
hydraulic efficiency of Chatlin Lake
canal by clearing and snagging or
channel reshaping, and non structural
flood proofing of structures.
3. Scoping. Scoping is the process for
determining the scope of alternatives
and significant issues to be addressed in
the EIS. For this analysis, a letter will
be sent to all parties believed to have an
interest in the analysis, requesting their
input on alternatives and issues to be
evaluated. The letter will also notify
interested parties of public scoping
meetings that will be held in the local
area. Notices will also be sent to local
news media. All interested parties are
invited to comment at this time, and
anyone interested in this study should
request to be included in the study
mailing list.
A public scoping meeting will be held
in the middle part of 2005. The meeting
will be held in the vicinity of
Alexandria, LA. Additional meetings
could be held, depending upon interest
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30421
and if it is determined that further
public coordination is warranted.
4. Significant Issues. The tentative list
of resources and issues to be evaluated
in the EIS includes wetlands (marshes
and swamps), aquatic, fisheries,
wildlife, water quality, air quality,
threatened and endangered species,
recreation resources, and cultural
resources. Socioeconomic items to be
evaluated in the EIS include flood
protection, business and industrial
activity, employment, land use,
property values, public/community
facilities and services, tax revenues,
population, community and regional
growth, transportation, housing,
community cohesion, and noise.
5. Environmental Consultation and
Review. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) will be assisting in the
documentation of existing conditions
and assessment of effects of project
alternatives through Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act consultation
procedures. The USFWS will provide a
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
report. Consultation will be
accomplished with the USFWS and the
National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) concerning threatened and
endangered species and their critical
habitat. The draft EIS (DEIS) or a notice
of its availability will be distributed to
all interested agencies, organizations,
and individuals.
6. Estimated Date of Availability.
Funding levels will dictate the date
when the DEIS is available. The earliest
that the DEIS is expected to be available
is in the fall of 2006.
Dated: May 11, 2005.
Peter J. Rowan,
Colonel, U.S. Army, District Engineer.
[FR Doc. 05–10544 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–84–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) for the Construction of a
Proposed Disposal Site for Dredged
material in the Middle Branch of the
Patapsco River, at Masonville,
Baltimore City/Application for a Corps
Section 10/404 Individual Permit
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Baltimore District, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
expects receipt of an application in
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
30422
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Notices
January 2006 from the State of Maryland
Department of Transportation, Maryland
Port Administration (MPA) for a Section
10/404 individual permit for the
construction of a disposal site for
dredged material in the Middle Branch
of the Patapsco River, at Masonville,
Baltimore City, MD. Based on
preliminary discussions with the MPA,
the Corps has determined that an
environmental impact statement (EIS) is
required for this proposed project. The
applicant’s stated purpose of the
proposed project is to provide a disposal
site to accommodate dredged material
generated by dredging projects
occurring over the next 5 to 10 years in
the Baltimore Harbor area. The EIS will
focus on the 5–10 year dredging needs
within Baltimore Harbor and upland
containment and beneficial use of
dredged materials from the Port of
Baltimore channel system in the
Patapsco River and its tributaries. As
part of this study, in accordance with
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969, an EIS will be prepared
to document the plan formulation
process and recommendations of this
study.
A public scoping meeting is
scheduled for June 15, 2005, at 7 p.m.
Display material and staff will be
available beginning at 6 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting address is the
Baum Auditorium at the Harbor
Hospital; 3001 S. Hanover Street,
Baltimore, MD 21225.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions or information about the
proposed action and draft EIS can be
addressed to Jon Romeo, Operations
Division, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, ATTN: CENAB–OP–
RMN, 10 South Howard Street, P.O. Box
1715, Baltimore, MD 21203–1715,
telephone 410–972–6079; e-mail
address:
jon.romeo@nab02.usace.army.mil.
DATES:
The
Baltimore Harbor study area is defined
as the Patapsco River area west of the
North Point-Rock Point line in the
Patapsco River to include Old Road Bay,
Bear Creek, Middle Branch, Northwest
Branch, and Curtis Bay and the
shoreline and open water between them.
Currently dredged material from
Baltimore harbor is being placed in the
Hart-Miller Island (HMI) Containment
Facility, and, in the near future, will be
placed in the Cox Creek Dredged
Material Containment Facility (DMCF).
State legislative requirements prohibit
placing dredged material in HMI after
December 31, 2009. Management of the
cover and closure of HMI may limit
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:11 May 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
acceptance of dredged material
placement capacity could occur
beginning with the 2008 dredging
season (Fall 2008). The purpose of the
proposed Masonville disposal site, and
the associated EIS is to determine an
environmentally sound, economically
feasible method for the placement or use
of dredged material removed from
harbor channels and new dredge areas.
There is an estimated 16 million cubic
yard shortfall in dredged material
capacity within the harbor over the next
20 years. The applicant and the Corps
are actively seeking public opinion,
participation, and advice to be
incorporated into the planning process
and the selection of placement options
for harbor dredged material. At this
time, the projects under consideration
include confined disposal sites at
Masonville, BP-Fairfield, and Sparrows
Point.
Alternatives to be addressed in the
DEIS will include: The no action
alternative and confined disposal
facilities at Masonville, BP-Fairfield,
and Sparrows Point. Beneficial uses,
such as habitat creation or restoration
may be associated with these options.
Community enhancement may also be
associated with these options, such as
public access to waterfront areas,
maritime heritage projects, community
parks and trails. As part of the initial
phase of the study, an objective
screening criteria developed in 2002
through the State’s Dredged Material
Management Program (DMMP) process,
will continue to be used to evaluate
harbor sites based on current
information obtained from the State of
Maryland’s DMMP, the Harbor Team,
public and agency input, available data,
and best professional judgment.
Following the NEPA process, once
projects are selected for consideration, a
detailed analysis of the existing
conditions will be undertaken;
alternative plans will be developed,
analyzed and compared; the impacts of
those plans will be analyzed; and a
recommended plan will be selected.
To solicit public input into the draft
EIS and into the selection of a project or
projects, a public scoping meeting is
planned (see DATES and ADDRESSES).
The EIS will be integrated with
analyses and consultation required by
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), seciton 10 of the River and
Harbor Act, section 401 and section 404
of the Clean Water Act, section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act, the Clean Air
Act, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act, section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act,
Prime and Unique Farmlands, the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Conservation and Management Act. All
appropriate documentation (i.e., section
7, section 106 coordination letters, and
public and agency comments) will be
obtained and included as part of the
EIS. As part of the EIS process,
recommendations will be based on an
evaluation of the probable impact of the
proposed activity on the public interest.
The decision will reflect the national
concern for the protection and
utilization of important resources. The
benefit, which may reasonably be
expected to accrue from the proposal,
will be balanced against its reasonably
foreseeable detriments. All factors that
may be relevant to the proposal will be
considered, among these are wetlands;
fish and wildlife resources; cultural
resources; land use; water and air
quality; hazardous, toxic, and
radioactive substances; threatened and
endangered species; regional geology;
aesthetics; environmental justice;
navigation; cumulative impacts; and the
general needs and welfare of the public.
The draft EIS is expected for public
release in March 2006.
Christina E. Correale,
Chief, Operations Division.
[FR Doc. 05–10543 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–41–M
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests
Department of Education.
The Leader, Information
Management Case Services Team,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, invites comments on the
proposed information collection
requests as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before July 25,
2005.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The Leader,
Information Management Case Services
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 101 (Thursday, May 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30421-30422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-10543]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
for the Construction of a Proposed Disposal Site for Dredged material
in the Middle Branch of the Patapsco River, at Masonville, Baltimore
City/Application for a Corps Section 10/404 Individual Permit
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Baltimore District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
expects receipt of an application in
[[Page 30422]]
January 2006 from the State of Maryland Department of Transportation,
Maryland Port Administration (MPA) for a Section 10/404 individual
permit for the construction of a disposal site for dredged material in
the Middle Branch of the Patapsco River, at Masonville, Baltimore City,
MD. Based on preliminary discussions with the MPA, the Corps has
determined that an environmental impact statement (EIS) is required for
this proposed project. The applicant's stated purpose of the proposed
project is to provide a disposal site to accommodate dredged material
generated by dredging projects occurring over the next 5 to 10 years in
the Baltimore Harbor area. The EIS will focus on the 5-10 year dredging
needs within Baltimore Harbor and upland containment and beneficial use
of dredged materials from the Port of Baltimore channel system in the
Patapsco River and its tributaries. As part of this study, in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969,
an EIS will be prepared to document the plan formulation process and
recommendations of this study.
DATES: A public scoping meeting is scheduled for June 15, 2005, at 7
p.m. Display material and staff will be available beginning at 6 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting address is the Baum Auditorium at the Harbor
Hospital; 3001 S. Hanover Street, Baltimore, MD 21225.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions or information about the
proposed action and draft EIS can be addressed to Jon Romeo, Operations
Division, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: CENAB-
OP-RMN, 10 South Howard Street, P.O. Box 1715, Baltimore, MD 21203-
1715, telephone 410-972-6079; e-mail address:
jon.romeo@nab02.usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Baltimore Harbor study area is defined
as the Patapsco River area west of the North Point-Rock Point line in
the Patapsco River to include Old Road Bay, Bear Creek, Middle Branch,
Northwest Branch, and Curtis Bay and the shoreline and open water
between them. Currently dredged material from Baltimore harbor is being
placed in the Hart-Miller Island (HMI) Containment Facility, and, in
the near future, will be placed in the Cox Creek Dredged Material
Containment Facility (DMCF). State legislative requirements prohibit
placing dredged material in HMI after December 31, 2009. Management of
the cover and closure of HMI may limit acceptance of dredged material
placement capacity could occur beginning with the 2008 dredging season
(Fall 2008). The purpose of the proposed Masonville disposal site, and
the associated EIS is to determine an environmentally sound,
economically feasible method for the placement or use of dredged
material removed from harbor channels and new dredge areas. There is an
estimated 16 million cubic yard shortfall in dredged material capacity
within the harbor over the next 20 years. The applicant and the Corps
are actively seeking public opinion, participation, and advice to be
incorporated into the planning process and the selection of placement
options for harbor dredged material. At this time, the projects under
consideration include confined disposal sites at Masonville, BP-
Fairfield, and Sparrows Point.
Alternatives to be addressed in the DEIS will include: The no
action alternative and confined disposal facilities at Masonville, BP-
Fairfield, and Sparrows Point. Beneficial uses, such as habitat
creation or restoration may be associated with these options. Community
enhancement may also be associated with these options, such as public
access to waterfront areas, maritime heritage projects, community parks
and trails. As part of the initial phase of the study, an objective
screening criteria developed in 2002 through the State's Dredged
Material Management Program (DMMP) process, will continue to be used to
evaluate harbor sites based on current information obtained from the
State of Maryland's DMMP, the Harbor Team, public and agency input,
available data, and best professional judgment. Following the NEPA
process, once projects are selected for consideration, a detailed
analysis of the existing conditions will be undertaken; alternative
plans will be developed, analyzed and compared; the impacts of those
plans will be analyzed; and a recommended plan will be selected.
To solicit public input into the draft EIS and into the selection
of a project or projects, a public scoping meeting is planned (see
DATES and ADDRESSES).
The EIS will be integrated with analyses and consultation required
by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), seciton 10 of the
River and Harbor Act, section 401 and section 404 of the Clean Water
Act, section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Air Act, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act, Prime and Unique Farmlands, the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. All appropriate
documentation (i.e., section 7, section 106 coordination letters, and
public and agency comments) will be obtained and included as part of
the EIS. As part of the EIS process, recommendations will be based on
an evaluation of the probable impact of the proposed activity on the
public interest. The decision will reflect the national concern for the
protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit, which
may reasonably be expected to accrue from the proposal, will be
balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors
that may be relevant to the proposal will be considered, among these
are wetlands; fish and wildlife resources; cultural resources; land
use; water and air quality; hazardous, toxic, and radioactive
substances; threatened and endangered species; regional geology;
aesthetics; environmental justice; navigation; cumulative impacts; and
the general needs and welfare of the public. The draft EIS is expected
for public release in March 2006.
Christina E. Correale,
Chief, Operations Division.
[FR Doc. 05-10543 Filed 5-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-41-M
