Sales of Nondeposit Investments, 30489-30494 [05-10381]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Notices
type of synthetic web material used in
the sling.
Paragraph (i)(8)(i) prohibits the use of
repaired synthetic web slings until they
have been proof tested by the
manufacturer or equivalent entity.
Paragraph (i)(8)(ii) requires the
employer to retain a certificate of the
proof test and make it available for
examination.
The information on the identification
tags, markings, and codings assist the
employer in determining whether the
sling can be used for the lifting task. The
sling inspections enable early detection
of faulty slings. The inspection and
repair records provide employers with
information about when the last
inspection was made and about the type
of the repairs made. This information
provides some assurance about the
condition of the slings. These records
also provide the most efficient means
for an OSHA compliance officer to
determine that an employer is
complying with the Standard. Prooftesting certificates give employers,
employees, and OSHA compliance
officers assurance that slings are safe to
use. The certificates also provide the
compliance officers with an efficient
means to assess employer compliance
with the Standard.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employees who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
OSHA proposes to extend the Office
of Management and Budget’s (OMB)
approval of the collection of information
(paperwork) requirements necessitated
by the Standard on Slings (29 CFR
1910.184). In its extension request,
OSHA also is proposing to reduce the
total burden hours for these
requirements from 21,517 hours to
19,167 hours. The Agency will include
this summary in its request to OMB to
extend the approval of the collection of
information requirements.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:11 May 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Type of Review: Extension of
currently approved information
collection requirements.
Title: Slings (29 CFR 1910.184).
OMB Number: 1218–0223.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofits; Not-for-profit organizations;
Federal Government; State, local, or
tribal government.
Number of respondents: 65,000.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
annually;
Average Time per Response: Varies
from 1 minute (.02 hour) to maintain a
certificate to 30 minutes (.50 hour) for
a manufacturing worker to acquire
information from a manufacturer for a
new tag, make a new tag, and affix it to
a sling.
Estimated Total Burden Hours:
19,167.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $0.
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on This Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments and
supporting materials in response to this
notice by (1) hard copy, (2) fax
transmission (facsimile), or (3)
electronically through the OSHA Web
page. Because of security-related
problems, a significant delay may occur
in the receipt of comments by regular
mail. Please contact the OSHA Docket
Office at (202) 693–2350 (TTY (877)
889–5627) for information about
security procedures concerning the
delivery of submissions by express
delivery, hand delivery, and courier
service.
All comments, submissions and
background documents are available for
inspection and copying at the OSHA
Docket Office at the above address.
Comments and submissions posted on
OSHA’s Web page are available at
https://www.OSHA.gov. Contact the
OSHA Docket Office for information
about materials not available through
the OSHA Web page and for assistance
using the Web page to locate docket
submissions.
Electronic copies of this Federal
Register notice as well as other relevant
documents are available on OSHA’s
Web page. Since all submissions
become public, private information such
as social security numbers should not be
submitted.
V. Authority and Signature
Jonathan L. Snare, Acting Assistance
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the
preparation of this notice. The authority
for this notice is the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30489
et seq.), and Secretary of Labor’s Order
No. 5–2002 (67 FR 65008).
Signed at Washington, DC, on May 20,
2005.
Jonathan L. Snare,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 05–10564 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–M
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
Sales of Nondeposit Investments
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Proposed Interpretive Ruling
and Policy Statement No. 05–1; with
request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The NCUA is proposing to
adopt an Interpretive Ruling and Policy
Statement (IRPS) on Sales of Nondeposit
Investments. The proposed IRPS
provides requirements, direction, and
guidance to federally-insured credit
unions on the establishment and
operation of third party brokerage
arrangements. The proposed IRPS
updates and replaces NCUA’s Letter to
Credit Unions No. 150 on the sales of
nondeposit investments.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods (please
send comments by one method only):
• NCUA Web site: https://
www.ncua.gov/news/proposed_regs/
proposed_regs.html. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: Address to
regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ‘‘[Your
name] Comments on Proposed IRPS
(Sales of Nondeposit Investments)’’ in
the e-mail subject line.
• Fax: (703) 518–6319. Use the
subject line described above for e-mail.
• Mail: Address to Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board, National Credit
Union Administration, 1775 Duke
Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314–
3428.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as
mail address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Peterson, Staff Attorney, Office of
General Counsel, at the above address or
telephone: (703) 518–6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Introduction
The NCUA Board is proposing to
replace its Letter to Credit Unions No.
150 that contains NCUA’s current
guidance on the sale of nondeposit
investments. NCUA issued Letter No.
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
30490
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Notices
150 in 1993. Since then, there have been
several changes in law and regulation
affecting the sale of nondeposit
investments. NCUA is proposing to
update this guidance, set out certain
requirements, and provide additional
information in the form of an IRPS.
NCUA has selected the IRPS format for
several reasons. First, an IRPS is more
accessible to credit unions and other
interested parties than a Letter to Credit
Unions. Second, an IRPS is an
appropriate format for disseminating
both guidance and requirements.
Finally, NCUA does not seek public
comment on Letters to Credit Unions
but generally publishes an IRPS in
proposed form with a request for public
comment and, in this case, as certain
provisions in the IRPS will have the
force of regulation, the Administrative
Procedure Act requires public notice
and comment. Moreover, NCUA
believes public comment on both the
requirements and guidance in this IRPS
will be very helpful, and NCUA
encourages interested members of the
public to provide their comments.
B. Background
Credit unions are organized to
provide their members with financial
services. While in the past credit unions
limited member services largely to share
accounts and loans, many credit unions
now bring their members a full range of
financial services. Some credit unions
provide their members with investment
options beyond share accounts,
including: stocks, bonds, mutual funds,
and variable annuities. These
investment choices are collectively
known as nondeposit investments.
Complex federal and state laws
govern the creation and transfer of
securities, and nondeposit investments,
including insurance products sold with
an investment component, are subject to
securities laws. In particular, Federal
securities laws require that those who
broker securities register with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) and comply with SEC regulations.
Federal law defines a securities broker
as any entity ‘‘engaged in the business
of effecting transactions in securities for
the account of others.’’ 15 U.S.C.
78c(a)(4). The SEC interprets the
concept of ‘‘effecting transactions’’ very
broadly. Generally, the SEC considers
not only those who buy and sell
securities directly for others as
securities brokers, but also those who
relay instructions to buy and sell or who
otherwise facilitate securities
transactions and receive compensation
related to the number or size of the
transactions.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:11 May 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Credit unions cannot register as
securities brokers. The requirements the
SEC places on brokers, including capital
and reserve requirements, are
inconsistent with those that NCUA and
state supervisory authorities place on
credit unions. If credit unions wish to
bring the option of nondeposit
investments to their members, they
must structure their involvement so that
the SEC will not require them to register
as brokers.
The most common method credit
unions employ is the third party
brokerage arrangement. In third party
brokerage arrangements, a credit union
can facilitate a brokerage firm that is
properly registered and licensed with
the SEC in selling securities. The SEC
permits certain facilitating entities,
including credit unions, to receive
transaction-related compensation from
the brokerage firm without subjecting
them to broker registration
requirements. In essence, the credit
union brings the brokerage firm to its
members, the members buy the
securities from the broker, and the
broker provides transaction-related
remuneration to the credit union.
Third party brokerage arrangements
can be either bilateral or multilateral.
Bilateral arrangements involve an
agreement between a credit union and a
registered broker. The broker may or
may not be a credit union service
organization (CUSO). Multilateral
arrangements involve an agreement
between a credit union, an unregistered
CUSO, and a registered broker. The SEC
expects a CUSO to register as a broker
if its activities rise to the level of
‘‘effecting the transfer of securities.’’
Accordingly, a credit union and
brokerage firm must limit the
involvement of an unregistered CUSO in
the sales of nondeposit investments. .
Credit unions have limited powers so,
in addition to compliance with
securities laws, the nondeposit
investment sales activities of credit
unions must be authorized under their
chartering statutes. Federal credit
unions do not have the authority to sell
nondeposit investments directly to their
members. Under the incidental powers
finder activity, however, a federal credit
union may bring a third party vendor,
the broker, to its members to offer them
a financial service, the purchase of
investments. 12 CFR 721.3(f). State
chartered credit unions must look to
their own state law for authority to
engage in third party brokerage
activities.
The antifraud provisions of applicable
federal and state laws prohibit
materially misleading or inaccurate
representations in connection with
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
offers and sales of securities. The broker
could face potential liability if members
are misled about the nature of
nondeposit investment products,
including their uninsured status. The
broker could also face potential liability
for other improper sales practices, such
as account churning or failing to
evaluate the suitability of a particular
nondeposit investment for a member.
While responsibility for proper sales
practices falls on the broker, a credit
union could also be liable if it fails to
ensure that the brokerage activity is
properly separated from the credit
union’s other activities, such as its
deposit taking and lending. Complete
separation of the credit union from the
nondeposit investment activities is not
possible because the sales are being
offered to the member through the
auspices of the credit union. The
broker’s sales representative, for
example, will often be located on credit
union premises, credit union employees
may refer members to the sales
representative, and credit union
employees are permitted to provide
literature about nondeposit investments
to the member. The use of dual
employee sales representatives, meaning
an employee who works for both the
credit union and the broker, may
increase the legal risk to the credit
union.
Credit union management must be
aware of how the member will perceive
the relationship between a credit union
and the broker and how the two may be
connected in the member’s mind. The
greater the possible connection, the
more management must be involved in
oversight of nondeposit investment
sales practices. One federal court
considered a case where an
unsophisticated bank customer took out
a mortgage loan to finance speculative
securities purchases from the bank’s
third party broker. The court concluded
that various facts, including the use of
a dual employee relationship, created a
fiduciary relationship between the bank
and the customer that the bank violated
when it allowed the inappropriate
mortgage and securities transaction to
occur. Scott v. Dime Savings Bank, 886
F.Supp. 1073 (S.D.N.Y. 1995), aff’d 101
F.3d 107 (2d Cir. 1996), cert. den. 520
U.S. 1122 (1997). See also Conte v. U.S.
Alliance Federal Credit Union, 303
F.Supp.2d 220 (D. Conn.
2004)(Existence or not of fiduciary
relationship between credit union and
member growing out of third party
broker nondeposit investment sales is a
factual question for the trial jury to
decide).
NCUA’s Letter No. 150, issued in
1993, contains NCUA’s current
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Notices
guidance to credit unions on the sales
of nondeposit investments. Several
events since 1993 require that NCUA
update the information in Letter No.
150. One change is NCUA’s replacement
of the Group Purchasing Activities rule
with the Incidental Powers rule and the
elimination of some restrictions on the
compensation a federal credit union
may receive from its finder activities. 12
CFR part 721.
Another change is a proposed
Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) regulation that would expand and
clarify a credit union’s authority to
participate in third party brokerage
arrangements without requiring the
credit union to register as a broker. SEC
Regulation B, 69 FR 39682 (June 30,
2004)(Proposed). Regulation B, when
finalized, will replace current SEC
guidance applicable to credit unions
contained in a series of ‘‘no action’’
letters. See, e.g., SEC Letter Re: Chubb
Securities Corporation (Nov. 24, 1993).
The SEC has not yet finalized
Regulation B. If the final Regulation B
differs materially from the proposed
Regulation B, the NCUA Board will
make appropriate changes to the text of
the final IRPS. The NCUA Office of
General Counsel has also issued several
legal opinion letters since 1993
interpreting various aspects of the sale
of nondeposit investment sales.
Accordingly, NCUA has determined
to update the guidance in Letter No. 150
and issue the update in IRPS form.
NCUA believes that the IRPS is a better
medium for the information than a letter
to credit unions. The IRPS is more
accessible, and is also appropriate for
both mandatory requirements and
guidance.
C. Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires that NCUA prepare an analysis
describing any significant economic
impact agency rulemaking may have on
a substantial number of small credit
unions. 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. For
purposes of this analysis, NCUA
considers credit unions under $10
million in assets as small credit unions.
Since the binding requirements in this
IRPS are generally restatements of
requirements in other laws and
regulations, NCUA does not believe this
proposed IRPS will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small credit unions. NCUA
invites the public to comment on this
issue.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:11 May 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Paperwork Reduction Act
NCUA has determined that this
proposed IRPS does not increase
paperwork requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35) and regulations of the
Office of Management and Budget.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages
independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their regulatory
actions on state and local interests. In
adherence to fundamental federalism
principles, NCUA, an independent
regulatory agency as defined in 44
U.S.C. 3502(5), voluntarily complies
with the executive order.
This proposed IRPS applies to all
credit unions, but does not have
substantial direct effect on the states, on
the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. NCUA has
determined that this proposed IRPS
does not constitute a policy that has
federalism implications for purposes of
the executive order.
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board, on May 19, 2005.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752a, 1756, 1757,
1766, 1783, 1784.
Proposed Interpretive Ruling and
Policy Statement No. 05–1; Sales of
Nondeposit Investments
I. Introduction
This Interpretive Ruling and Policy
Statement (IRPS) provides requirements,
direction, and guidance to federallyinsured credit unions offering their
members nondeposit investments
through third party brokerage
arrangements. Among other things, this
IRPS discusses the relationship between
the credit union and the brokerage firm
and the responsibilities of each, the
separation of investment sales activities
from the receipt of deposits or shares,
contacts with members concerning
securities sales, compensation and
referral fees, the use of dual employees,
sales to nonmembers, and related issues
and concerns.
The information in this IRPS comes
from a variety of sources, including the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC), the National Association of
Securities Dealers (NASD), and NCUA.
This IRPS addresses the SEC’s
requirements and related guidance first.
The IRPS concludes with additional
NCUA requirements and guidance.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30491
II. Purpose
This IRPS supersedes NCUA’s Letter
to Credit Unions No. 150, Sales of
Nondeposit Investments. The
information in this IRPS is intended to
help credit unions conduct third party
brokerage activities in a manner that is
legal, protects members from potential
securities fraud and abuse, and
minimizes safety and soundness
concerns for the credit union. The use
of the word ‘‘must’’ in this IRPS reflects
a legal requirement for credit unions.
The use of the word ‘‘should’’ indicates
guidance as to best practices.
III. Scope
The scope of this IRPS is sales of
nondeposit investments to members
through third party brokerage
arrangements. This IRPS does not cover:
• No-load money market mutual fund
transactions through a sweep account
arrangement;
• Securities safekeeping activities,
such as IRA custodianships;
• Nondeposit investment transactions
for the credit union’s own investment
account; and
• Transactions in insurance products
that do not include an investment
component. Examples of these
insurance products generally include
whole life insurance and insurance sold
in connection with loans.
IV. Conduct of Third Party Brokerage
Arrangements: SEC Requirements
Sales of nondeposit investments are
subject to the securities laws and the
regulation and oversight of the SEC.
This section contains the SEC’s
regulatory requirements for the conduct
of third party brokerage arrangements at
credit unions. After each SEC
requirement are additional direction
and guidance from National Association
of Securities Dealers (NASD) Rule 2350
and the NCUA.
SEC Requirement: The broker must
perform brokerage services in an area
that is clearly marked and, to the extent
practicable, physically separate from the
routine deposit-taking activities of the
credit union. The broker must clearly
identify to members that it is providing
the brokerage services, not the credit
union. Any materials a credit union or
broker uses to advertise or promote the
availability of brokerage services under
the arrangement must comply with
federal securities laws. Advertising and
promotional material must also clearly
indicate that the brokerage services are
being provided by the broker and not by
the credit union. The credit union or
broker must also inform each customer
that the securities being offered are not
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
30492
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Notices
shares or other obligations of the credit
union, are not guaranteed by the credit
union, and are not insured by the
National Credit Union Administration
or any other federal agency.
Credit unions and the brokerage firms
must market nondeposit investment
products in a manner that does not
mislead or confuse members as to the
nature or risks of these uninsured
products. To avoid member confusion
about these products, credit union
policies should specifically address the
locations at which sales will take place.
The best practice is that deposit-taking
be physically separated from nondeposit
sales functions.
The broker’s sales representative must
make complete and accurate disclosures
to avoid the possibility that a member
might confuse an uninsured investment
product with an insured share account.
When selling, advertising, or otherwise
marketing uninsured investment
products to members, members must be
informed that the products offered:
• Are not federally insured;
• Are not obligations of the credit
union;
• Are not guaranteed by the credit
union or any affiliated entity;
• Involve investment risks, including
the possible loss of principal; and
• If applicable, are being offered by a
dual employee who serves both
functions of accepting members’
deposits and the selling of nondeposit
investment products.
These disclosures must be clear and
conspicuous, and the broker’s sales
representative must obtain a separately
signed statement acknowledging the
disclosures from members at the time a
nondeposit investment account is
opened. These disclosures must also be
featured conspicuously in all written or
oral sales presentations, advertising and
promotional materials, prospectuses,
and periodic statements that include
information on both deposit and
nondeposit products. Abbreviated
versions of the disclosures may be used
in certain advertising media as
described in NASD Rule 2350.
The sales representative should also,
when discussing nondeposit
investments with a member face-to-face,
display a sign, readily visible to the
member, that states: ‘‘Investments sold
here are NOT offered by the credit
union, NOT guaranteed by the credit
union, and DO NOT have any federal
insurance. These investments may lose
value.’’
To avoid confusion, brokerage firms
should not offer investment products
with a product name similar to the
credit union’s name.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:11 May 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
SEC Requirement: Credit union
employees who are not dual employees
of the broker and the credit union may
perform only clerical or ministerial
functions in connection with brokerage
transactions. Clerical and ministerial
functions include scheduling
appointments with the broker’s sales
representative, forwarding customer
funds or securities, and describing in
general terms the types of investments
available from the credit union and the
broker under the arrangement.
SEC Requirement: Only employees of
the brokerage firm, or dual employees of
the brokerage firm and the credit union,
may receive incentive compensation for
brokerage transactions. Other credit
union employees may receive
compensation for referral of members to
the brokerage sales representative if the
compensation is a nominal one-time
cash fee of a fixed dollar amount and
the payment of the fee is not contingent
on whether the referral results in a
transaction. In this context, ‘‘nominal’’
generally means that the payment may
not exceed the greater of twenty-five
dollars or the wages the employee is
paid for one hour of work.
The SEC’s Regulation B indexes the
maximum amount of a referral fee to
inflation, so credit unions seeking to set
referral fees as high as the SEC permits
should consult with qualified counsel.
SEC Requirement: The credit union
must have a written contract with any
broker that offers brokerage services on
the credit union’s premises.
The credit union should also have a
written contract with any brokerage firm
that offers brokerage services through
credit union mailings, e-mails or
telephone calls made or sent by the
credit union, or through the credit
union’s Web site.
V. Conduct of Third Party Brokerage
Arrangements: Additional NCUA
Requirements, Direction, and Guidance
The SEC’s regulatory requirements are
primarily intended to protect the
customer. This section contains
additional guidance that is not dictated
by or directly related to the SEC’s
requirements. Much of this guidance
relates to the safety and soundness of
the credit union.
Risks to the Credit Union
As with any business activity, a credit
union’s directors must evaluate the risks
associated with nondeposit investment
activities. The risks include:
• Legal Risk: The credit union could
be held liable for abusive sales practices
perpetrated by nondeposit investment
sales representatives.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Reputation Risk: The credit union
could be damaged by association with
abusive sales practices, even if not liable
for the practices.
• Economic Risk: The credit union
could lose money if it commits itself to
pay any expenses associated with the
nondeposit investment activity and the
sales and associated revenue are
insufficient to pay those expenses.
Due Diligence in Selecting an
Appropriate Brokerage Firm
Before entering into a third party
brokerage arrangement, credit unions
must take care to select an appropriate
brokerage firm. For each firm under
consideration, the credit union should:
• Ensure the firm can provide the
services that credit union members
need.
• Review the firm’s financial
statements and capital adequacy.
• Determine if the firm can
adequately supervise its sales
representatives at the credit union’s
location.
• Ask the firm to provide references,
preferably other depository institutions,
and talk with those references.
• Conduct background and NASD
checks on the firm’s principals and the
sales representatives that will be
working at the credit union.
Credit Union Policies, Procedures, and
Contracts
The credit union must adopt written
policies and procedures concerning the
brokerage arrangement. Many of these
policies and procedures should be
reflected in the contract with the
brokerage firm. At a minimum, the
policies, procedures, and contracts
should address:
• The features of the sales program.
Credit union policies should describe
the types of products that a broker may
offer through the third party brokerage
arrangement. For all products, the credit
union should identify specific laws,
regulations, and any other limitations or
requirements, including qualitative
considerations, that will expressly
govern the selection and marketing of
products a broker may offer. Qualitative
considerations include an analysis of
the level of complexity and volatility in
the investments that you will permit the
broker to offer your members.
• A description of the relative
responsibilities of the credit union and
the brokerage firm. The credit union’s
policies and the contract between the
brokerage firm and the credit union
must make clear that the brokerage firm
is primarily responsible for ensuring
that the nondeposit sales function is
conducted in compliance with all
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Notices
applicable laws, regulations, and
policies. The contract should, however,
recognize that the credit union has the
right to check for compliance and may
access member accounts for verification
and oversight.
• Indemnification by the brokerage
firm. Credit unions policies should
require a specific and unambiguous
contractual agreement from the
brokerage firm to indemnify the credit
union for any monetary damages arising
from nondeposit sales activities,
including but not limited to improper
sales practices.
• The roles of credit union
employees. Credit union policies should
describe the roles of credit union
employees in nondeposit investment
sales and the limits on their activities.
The limits and compensation for
referrals must be consistent with SEC
requirements.
• The roles of brokerage firm
employees. Credit union policies should
require the brokerage firm to provide the
credit union with a written document
that explains the duties of its sales
representatives and gives the credit
union the names, contact information,
and specific duties of those who will
supervise the sales representatives.
• The location of nondeposit sales.
Credit union policies should describe
where nondeposit sales may take place
and how those sales will be separated
from deposit-taking activities.
• The use of credit union member
information. The credit union’s policies
should describe the information that
may be transferred between the credit
union and the brokerage firm or the
brokerage firm’s sales representative.
The policies and contracts should
describe how such information will be
used and safeguarded and the associated
privacy notices to members. The
policies and contract terms must
comply with NCUA’s Privacy of
Consumer Financial Information Rule
and NCUA’s Security Program Rule. 12
CFR parts 716 and 748. The brokerage
firm must agree in writing to comply
with the credit union’s policies on
information practices.
• Termination of the contract. The
contract should contain a provision that
permits the credit union to terminate
the contract for both cause and for the
convenience of the credit union. Failure
by the brokerage firm to adequately
supervise its sales representative should
be included as a specific for-cause
reason for contract termination.
• Compliance with the requirements
in this IRPS and applicable law and
regulation. Credit unions must maintain
programs to monitor compliance by the
broker, its salespeople, and other
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:11 May 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
entities involved in the sales of
nondeposit investments. Credit union
personnel performing the compliance
function should be independent of any
credit union personnel involved in
investment product sales and
management. At a minimum, the
compliance function should include a
system that monitors member
complaints; ensures supervisory
personnel at the broker make scheduled
examinations of their sales personnel;
and contacts members that have
purchased nondeposit investments to
ensure they received and understood
the required disclosures. Compliance
personnel should also conduct periodic,
random samplings of account activity to
look for evidence of abuse. When
conducting sampling, compliance
personnel should look for evidence such
as:
Æ Accounts with a high rate of
investment turnover, which may
indicate the sales representative is
churning accounts to generate
commissions;
Æ Accounts with complex
investments that may be unsuitable for
the particular member; and
Æ A combination of loan accounts
and nondeposit investment accounts
that might indicate a member borrowed
large sums of money from the credit
union to finance nondeposit investment
purchases.
Credit unions should consult with
qualified counsel for further information
about what to review when examining
member accounts. The intensity of the
credit union’s compliance effort will
depend on the nature and extent of
nondeposit investment sales, evidence
of the effectiveness of the broker’s
compliance systems, and the level of
member complaints. Whether the credit
union can obtain an unambiguous
indemnification agreement from the
brokerage firm should also affect the
intensity of the compliance effort.
The Use of Dual Employees
Credit unions may establish a third
party brokerage arrangement using dual
employees. These arrangements create
additional risk for the credit union and
must be designed, operated, and
monitored carefully.
• Separation of duties. A dual
employee should have separate, written
job descriptions for the duties
performed for the credit union and the
nondeposit investment sales duties,
which are performed for the brokerage
firm. The duties performed for the credit
union should be unrelated to the sale of
nondeposit investments. The duties
performed for the credit union should
not bring the employee into contact
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30493
with members that might also purchase
nondeposit investments. The dual
employee should have no management
or policy-setting responsibilities within
the credit union related to nondeposit
investments.
• Separation of employment
descriptions when interacting with
members. The dual employee should
not use any materials that could
potentially confuse a member as to the
capacity in which the dual employee is
functioning. For example, dual
employees should use separate business
cards for their credit union and
nondeposit investment sales functions.
Likewise, dual employees should use
separate stationary for nondeposit
investment correspondence and credit
union correspondence and, when
conducting nondeposit investment
business, dual employees should not
reference their positions at the credit
union.
• Dual employee compensation. The
compensation a dual employee receives
for nondeposit investment activities
may be paid directly by the broker to the
employee. Alternatively, the broker may
reimburse the credit union for the
employee’s nondeposit investment
activities. The credit union’s records
and the periodic earnings statement
provided to the employee should
indicate how compensation is divided
between nondeposit investment work
and work for the credit union. A dual
employee should also have written
agreements with the two employers
establishing the amount of each
employer’s compensation to the
employee.
• Indemnification. The use of dual
employees increases the risk a credit
union may be held liable for abusive
sales practices. At the same time, the
brokerage firm may have less incentive
to supervise nondeposit sales activities
properly when conducted by a dual
employee. Accordingly, the credit union
should seek an indemnification
agreement from the brokerage firm as
described above. The credit union
should also seek fidelity bond coverage
or additional insurance for any credit
union liability arising from employee
misconduct related to the nondeposit
investment function.
Sales of Nondeposit Investments to
Nonmembers
Because credit unions may only
provide services to members, a credit
union may generally only accept income
and pay expenses associated with
nondeposit investment sales to its
members. NCUA realizes, however, that
in some cases it may be difficult for a
credit union to connect particular
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
30494
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Notices
income to a transaction involving a
member. For example, some sales
representatives may have generated
sales that occurred before the
representative joined the brokerage
arrangement. These representatives may
bring with them a stream of trailer
income that cannot now be associated
with any particular person or is not
otherwise attributable to members of the
credit union. A similar situation may
arise in brokerage arrangements
involving multiple credit unions
working with one broker and sales made
to members of the various credit unions.
To address these situations, NCUA
will allow a credit union in a third party
brokerage arrangement to accept a de
minimus amount of income that is not
directly attributable to sales to its
members. In this context, de minimus
means that the ratio of income not
directly attributable to members to the
total gross income the credit union
receives under the arrangement cannot
exceed five percent.
A similar issue may arise if a credit
union pays expenses associated with the
sales of nondeposit investments. NCUA
will allow a credit union in a third party
brokerage arrangement to pay a de
minimus amount of expenses associated
with the sale of nondeposit investments
to nonmembers. In this context, de
minimus means that the ratio of
nonmember sales expenses paid by the
credit union to the total expenses paid
by the credit union under the
arrangement cannot exceed five percent.
VI. Applicable Law and Regulation
• The Federal Credit Union Act, 12
U.S.C. 1751 et seq.
• The Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, § 3(a)(4), 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.
• Regulation B, Securities Activities
of Banks and Other Financial
Institutions, 15 CFR 242.710 et seq.
• NASD Rule 2350, Broker/Dealer
Conduct on the Premises of Financial
Institutions.
• NASD Rule 3040, Private Securities
Transactions of an Associated Person.
[FR Doc. 05–10381 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) has submitted the
following information collection
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:11 May 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
requirement to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104–13.
This is the second notice; the first notice
was published at 70 FR 13544 and no
comments were received. Comments
regarding (a) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of burden including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology should be addressed to:
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs of OMB, Attention: Desk Officer
for National Science Foundation, 725
17th Street, NW., Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, and to Suzanne
H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer,
National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Suite 295, Arlington,
Virginia 22230 or send e-mail to
splimpto@nsf.gov. Comments regarding
these information collections are best
assured of having their full effect if
received within 30 days of this
notification. Copies of the submission(s)
may be obtained by calling (703) 292–
7556.
NSF may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number
and the agency informs potential
persons who are to respond to the
collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: National Science
Foundation Applicant Survey.
OMB Approval Number: 3145–0096.
Type of Request: Intent to seek
approval to extend an information
collection for three years.
Proposed Project: The current
National Science Foundation Applicant
survey has been in use for several years.
Data are collected from applicant pools
to examine the facial/sexual/disability
composition and to determine the
source of information about NSF
vacancies.
Use of the Information: Analysis of
the applicant pools is necessary to
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
determine if NSF’s targeted recruitment
efforts are reaching groups that are
underrepresented in the Agency’s
workforce and/or to defend the
Foundation’s practices in
discrimination cases.
Burden on the Public: The Foundation
estimates about 8,000 responses
annually at 1 minute per response; this
computes to approximately 133 hours
annually.
Dated: May 20, 2002.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 05–10484 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Submission for OMB review;
Comment request.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104–13
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), and as part of
its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden, the
National Science Foundation (NSF) is
inviting the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on this
proposed continuing information
collection. This is the second notice for
public comment; the first was published
in the Federal Register at 70 FR 9981
and no comments were received. NSF is
forwarding the proposed submission to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for clearance simultaneously
with the publication of this second
notice.
Comments regarding these
information collections are best assured
of having their full effect if received by
OMB within 30 days of publication in
the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding (a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of NSF,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
NSF’s estimate of burden including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; or (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriated automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 101 (Thursday, May 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30489-30494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-10381]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
Sales of Nondeposit Investments
AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Proposed Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement No. 05-1;
with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The NCUA is proposing to adopt an Interpretive Ruling and
Policy Statement (IRPS) on Sales of Nondeposit Investments. The
proposed IRPS provides requirements, direction, and guidance to
federally-insured credit unions on the establishment and operation of
third party brokerage arrangements. The proposed IRPS updates and
replaces NCUA's Letter to Credit Unions No. 150 on the sales of
nondeposit investments.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods
(please send comments by one method only):
NCUA Web site: https://www.ncua.gov/news/proposed_regs/
proposed_regs.html. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: Address to regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ``[Your
name] Comments on Proposed IRPS (Sales of Nondeposit Investments)'' in
the e-mail subject line.
Fax: (703) 518-6319. Use the subject line described above
for e-mail.
Mail: Address to Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board,
National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria,
Virginia 22314-3428.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as mail address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Peterson, Staff Attorney, Office
of General Counsel, at the above address or telephone: (703) 518-6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Introduction
The NCUA Board is proposing to replace its Letter to Credit Unions
No. 150 that contains NCUA's current guidance on the sale of nondeposit
investments. NCUA issued Letter No.
[[Page 30490]]
150 in 1993. Since then, there have been several changes in law and
regulation affecting the sale of nondeposit investments. NCUA is
proposing to update this guidance, set out certain requirements, and
provide additional information in the form of an IRPS. NCUA has
selected the IRPS format for several reasons. First, an IRPS is more
accessible to credit unions and other interested parties than a Letter
to Credit Unions. Second, an IRPS is an appropriate format for
disseminating both guidance and requirements. Finally, NCUA does not
seek public comment on Letters to Credit Unions but generally publishes
an IRPS in proposed form with a request for public comment and, in this
case, as certain provisions in the IRPS will have the force of
regulation, the Administrative Procedure Act requires public notice and
comment. Moreover, NCUA believes public comment on both the
requirements and guidance in this IRPS will be very helpful, and NCUA
encourages interested members of the public to provide their comments.
B. Background
Credit unions are organized to provide their members with financial
services. While in the past credit unions limited member services
largely to share accounts and loans, many credit unions now bring their
members a full range of financial services. Some credit unions provide
their members with investment options beyond share accounts, including:
stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and variable annuities. These investment
choices are collectively known as nondeposit investments.
Complex federal and state laws govern the creation and transfer of
securities, and nondeposit investments, including insurance products
sold with an investment component, are subject to securities laws. In
particular, Federal securities laws require that those who broker
securities register with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) and comply with SEC regulations. Federal law defines a securities
broker as any entity ``engaged in the business of effecting
transactions in securities for the account of others.'' 15 U.S.C.
78c(a)(4). The SEC interprets the concept of ``effecting transactions''
very broadly. Generally, the SEC considers not only those who buy and
sell securities directly for others as securities brokers, but also
those who relay instructions to buy and sell or who otherwise
facilitate securities transactions and receive compensation related to
the number or size of the transactions.
Credit unions cannot register as securities brokers. The
requirements the SEC places on brokers, including capital and reserve
requirements, are inconsistent with those that NCUA and state
supervisory authorities place on credit unions. If credit unions wish
to bring the option of nondeposit investments to their members, they
must structure their involvement so that the SEC will not require them
to register as brokers.
The most common method credit unions employ is the third party
brokerage arrangement. In third party brokerage arrangements, a credit
union can facilitate a brokerage firm that is properly registered and
licensed with the SEC in selling securities. The SEC permits certain
facilitating entities, including credit unions, to receive transaction-
related compensation from the brokerage firm without subjecting them to
broker registration requirements. In essence, the credit union brings
the brokerage firm to its members, the members buy the securities from
the broker, and the broker provides transaction-related remuneration to
the credit union.
Third party brokerage arrangements can be either bilateral or
multilateral. Bilateral arrangements involve an agreement between a
credit union and a registered broker. The broker may or may not be a
credit union service organization (CUSO). Multilateral arrangements
involve an agreement between a credit union, an unregistered CUSO, and
a registered broker. The SEC expects a CUSO to register as a broker if
its activities rise to the level of ``effecting the transfer of
securities.'' Accordingly, a credit union and brokerage firm must limit
the involvement of an unregistered CUSO in the sales of nondeposit
investments. .
Credit unions have limited powers so, in addition to compliance
with securities laws, the nondeposit investment sales activities of
credit unions must be authorized under their chartering statutes.
Federal credit unions do not have the authority to sell nondeposit
investments directly to their members. Under the incidental powers
finder activity, however, a federal credit union may bring a third
party vendor, the broker, to its members to offer them a financial
service, the purchase of investments. 12 CFR 721.3(f). State chartered
credit unions must look to their own state law for authority to engage
in third party brokerage activities.
The antifraud provisions of applicable federal and state laws
prohibit materially misleading or inaccurate representations in
connection with offers and sales of securities. The broker could face
potential liability if members are misled about the nature of
nondeposit investment products, including their uninsured status. The
broker could also face potential liability for other improper sales
practices, such as account churning or failing to evaluate the
suitability of a particular nondeposit investment for a member.
While responsibility for proper sales practices falls on the
broker, a credit union could also be liable if it fails to ensure that
the brokerage activity is properly separated from the credit union's
other activities, such as its deposit taking and lending. Complete
separation of the credit union from the nondeposit investment
activities is not possible because the sales are being offered to the
member through the auspices of the credit union. The broker's sales
representative, for example, will often be located on credit union
premises, credit union employees may refer members to the sales
representative, and credit union employees are permitted to provide
literature about nondeposit investments to the member. The use of dual
employee sales representatives, meaning an employee who works for both
the credit union and the broker, may increase the legal risk to the
credit union.
Credit union management must be aware of how the member will
perceive the relationship between a credit union and the broker and how
the two may be connected in the member's mind. The greater the possible
connection, the more management must be involved in oversight of
nondeposit investment sales practices. One federal court considered a
case where an unsophisticated bank customer took out a mortgage loan to
finance speculative securities purchases from the bank's third party
broker. The court concluded that various facts, including the use of a
dual employee relationship, created a fiduciary relationship between
the bank and the customer that the bank violated when it allowed the
inappropriate mortgage and securities transaction to occur. Scott v.
Dime Savings Bank, 886 F.Supp. 1073 (S.D.N.Y. 1995), aff'd 101 F.3d 107
(2d Cir. 1996), cert. den. 520 U.S. 1122 (1997). See also Conte v. U.S.
Alliance Federal Credit Union, 303 F.Supp.2d 220 (D. Conn.
2004)(Existence or not of fiduciary relationship between credit union
and member growing out of third party broker nondeposit investment
sales is a factual question for the trial jury to decide).
NCUA's Letter No. 150, issued in 1993, contains NCUA's current
[[Page 30491]]
guidance to credit unions on the sales of nondeposit investments.
Several events since 1993 require that NCUA update the information in
Letter No. 150. One change is NCUA's replacement of the Group
Purchasing Activities rule with the Incidental Powers rule and the
elimination of some restrictions on the compensation a federal credit
union may receive from its finder activities. 12 CFR part 721.
Another change is a proposed Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) regulation that would expand and clarify a credit union's
authority to participate in third party brokerage arrangements without
requiring the credit union to register as a broker. SEC Regulation B,
69 FR 39682 (June 30, 2004)(Proposed). Regulation B, when finalized,
will replace current SEC guidance applicable to credit unions contained
in a series of ``no action'' letters. See, e.g., SEC Letter Re: Chubb
Securities Corporation (Nov. 24, 1993). The SEC has not yet finalized
Regulation B. If the final Regulation B differs materially from the
proposed Regulation B, the NCUA Board will make appropriate changes to
the text of the final IRPS. The NCUA Office of General Counsel has also
issued several legal opinion letters since 1993 interpreting various
aspects of the sale of nondeposit investment sales.
Accordingly, NCUA has determined to update the guidance in Letter
No. 150 and issue the update in IRPS form. NCUA believes that the IRPS
is a better medium for the information than a letter to credit unions.
The IRPS is more accessible, and is also appropriate for both mandatory
requirements and guidance.
C. Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires that NCUA prepare an
analysis describing any significant economic impact agency rulemaking
may have on a substantial number of small credit unions. 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq. For purposes of this analysis, NCUA considers credit unions
under $10 million in assets as small credit unions. Since the binding
requirements in this IRPS are generally restatements of requirements in
other laws and regulations, NCUA does not believe this proposed IRPS
will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small credit unions. NCUA invites the public to comment on this issue.
Paperwork Reduction Act
NCUA has determined that this proposed IRPS does not increase
paperwork requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35) and regulations of the Office of Management and
Budget.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their regulatory actions on state and local
interests. In adherence to fundamental federalism principles, NCUA, an
independent regulatory agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5),
voluntarily complies with the executive order.
This proposed IRPS applies to all credit unions, but does not have
substantial direct effect on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. NCUA has
determined that this proposed IRPS does not constitute a policy that
has federalism implications for purposes of the executive order.
By the National Credit Union Administration Board, on May 19,
2005.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752a, 1756, 1757, 1766, 1783, 1784.
Proposed Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement No. 05-1; Sales of
Nondeposit Investments
I. Introduction
This Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement (IRPS) provides
requirements, direction, and guidance to federally-insured credit
unions offering their members nondeposit investments through third
party brokerage arrangements. Among other things, this IRPS discusses
the relationship between the credit union and the brokerage firm and
the responsibilities of each, the separation of investment sales
activities from the receipt of deposits or shares, contacts with
members concerning securities sales, compensation and referral fees,
the use of dual employees, sales to nonmembers, and related issues and
concerns.
The information in this IRPS comes from a variety of sources,
including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the National
Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), and NCUA. This IRPS addresses
the SEC's requirements and related guidance first. The IRPS concludes
with additional NCUA requirements and guidance.
II. Purpose
This IRPS supersedes NCUA's Letter to Credit Unions No. 150, Sales
of Nondeposit Investments. The information in this IRPS is intended to
help credit unions conduct third party brokerage activities in a manner
that is legal, protects members from potential securities fraud and
abuse, and minimizes safety and soundness concerns for the credit
union. The use of the word ``must'' in this IRPS reflects a legal
requirement for credit unions. The use of the word ``should'' indicates
guidance as to best practices.
III. Scope
The scope of this IRPS is sales of nondeposit investments to
members through third party brokerage arrangements. This IRPS does not
cover:
No-load money market mutual fund transactions through a
sweep account arrangement;
Securities safekeeping activities, such as IRA
custodianships;
Nondeposit investment transactions for the credit union's
own investment account; and
Transactions in insurance products that do not include an
investment component. Examples of these insurance products generally
include whole life insurance and insurance sold in connection with
loans.
IV. Conduct of Third Party Brokerage Arrangements: SEC Requirements
Sales of nondeposit investments are subject to the securities laws
and the regulation and oversight of the SEC. This section contains the
SEC's regulatory requirements for the conduct of third party brokerage
arrangements at credit unions. After each SEC requirement are
additional direction and guidance from National Association of
Securities Dealers (NASD) Rule 2350 and the NCUA.
SEC Requirement: The broker must perform brokerage services in an
area that is clearly marked and, to the extent practicable, physically
separate from the routine deposit-taking activities of the credit
union. The broker must clearly identify to members that it is providing
the brokerage services, not the credit union. Any materials a credit
union or broker uses to advertise or promote the availability of
brokerage services under the arrangement must comply with federal
securities laws. Advertising and promotional material must also clearly
indicate that the brokerage services are being provided by the broker
and not by the credit union. The credit union or broker must also
inform each customer that the securities being offered are not
[[Page 30492]]
shares or other obligations of the credit union, are not guaranteed by
the credit union, and are not insured by the National Credit Union
Administration or any other federal agency.
Credit unions and the brokerage firms must market nondeposit
investment products in a manner that does not mislead or confuse
members as to the nature or risks of these uninsured products. To avoid
member confusion about these products, credit union policies should
specifically address the locations at which sales will take place. The
best practice is that deposit-taking be physically separated from
nondeposit sales functions.
The broker's sales representative must make complete and accurate
disclosures to avoid the possibility that a member might confuse an
uninsured investment product with an insured share account. When
selling, advertising, or otherwise marketing uninsured investment
products to members, members must be informed that the products
offered:
Are not federally insured;
Are not obligations of the credit union;
Are not guaranteed by the credit union or any affiliated
entity;
Involve investment risks, including the possible loss of
principal; and
If applicable, are being offered by a dual employee who
serves both functions of accepting members' deposits and the selling of
nondeposit investment products.
These disclosures must be clear and conspicuous, and the broker's
sales representative must obtain a separately signed statement
acknowledging the disclosures from members at the time a nondeposit
investment account is opened. These disclosures must also be featured
conspicuously in all written or oral sales presentations, advertising
and promotional materials, prospectuses, and periodic statements that
include information on both deposit and nondeposit products.
Abbreviated versions of the disclosures may be used in certain
advertising media as described in NASD Rule 2350.
The sales representative should also, when discussing nondeposit
investments with a member face-to-face, display a sign, readily visible
to the member, that states: ``Investments sold here are NOT offered by
the credit union, NOT guaranteed by the credit union, and DO NOT have
any federal insurance. These investments may lose value.''
To avoid confusion, brokerage firms should not offer investment
products with a product name similar to the credit union's name.
SEC Requirement: Credit union employees who are not dual employees
of the broker and the credit union may perform only clerical or
ministerial functions in connection with brokerage transactions.
Clerical and ministerial functions include scheduling appointments with
the broker's sales representative, forwarding customer funds or
securities, and describing in general terms the types of investments
available from the credit union and the broker under the arrangement.
SEC Requirement: Only employees of the brokerage firm, or dual
employees of the brokerage firm and the credit union, may receive
incentive compensation for brokerage transactions. Other credit union
employees may receive compensation for referral of members to the
brokerage sales representative if the compensation is a nominal one-
time cash fee of a fixed dollar amount and the payment of the fee is
not contingent on whether the referral results in a transaction. In
this context, ``nominal'' generally means that the payment may not
exceed the greater of twenty-five dollars or the wages the employee is
paid for one hour of work.
The SEC's Regulation B indexes the maximum amount of a referral fee
to inflation, so credit unions seeking to set referral fees as high as
the SEC permits should consult with qualified counsel.
SEC Requirement: The credit union must have a written contract with
any broker that offers brokerage services on the credit union's
premises.
The credit union should also have a written contract with any
brokerage firm that offers brokerage services through credit union
mailings, e-mails or telephone calls made or sent by the credit union,
or through the credit union's Web site.
V. Conduct of Third Party Brokerage Arrangements: Additional NCUA
Requirements, Direction, and Guidance
The SEC's regulatory requirements are primarily intended to protect
the customer. This section contains additional guidance that is not
dictated by or directly related to the SEC's requirements. Much of this
guidance relates to the safety and soundness of the credit union.
Risks to the Credit Union
As with any business activity, a credit union's directors must
evaluate the risks associated with nondeposit investment activities.
The risks include:
Legal Risk: The credit union could be held liable for
abusive sales practices perpetrated by nondeposit investment sales
representatives.
Reputation Risk: The credit union could be damaged by
association with abusive sales practices, even if not liable for the
practices.
Economic Risk: The credit union could lose money if it
commits itself to pay any expenses associated with the nondeposit
investment activity and the sales and associated revenue are
insufficient to pay those expenses.
Due Diligence in Selecting an Appropriate Brokerage Firm
Before entering into a third party brokerage arrangement, credit
unions must take care to select an appropriate brokerage firm. For each
firm under consideration, the credit union should:
Ensure the firm can provide the services that credit union
members need.
Review the firm's financial statements and capital
adequacy.
Determine if the firm can adequately supervise its sales
representatives at the credit union's location.
Ask the firm to provide references, preferably other
depository institutions, and talk with those references.
Conduct background and NASD checks on the firm's
principals and the sales representatives that will be working at the
credit union.
Credit Union Policies, Procedures, and Contracts
The credit union must adopt written policies and procedures
concerning the brokerage arrangement. Many of these policies and
procedures should be reflected in the contract with the brokerage firm.
At a minimum, the policies, procedures, and contracts should address:
The features of the sales program. Credit union policies
should describe the types of products that a broker may offer through
the third party brokerage arrangement. For all products, the credit
union should identify specific laws, regulations, and any other
limitations or requirements, including qualitative considerations, that
will expressly govern the selection and marketing of products a broker
may offer. Qualitative considerations include an analysis of the level
of complexity and volatility in the investments that you will permit
the broker to offer your members.
A description of the relative responsibilities of the
credit union and the brokerage firm. The credit union's policies and
the contract between the brokerage firm and the credit union must make
clear that the brokerage firm is primarily responsible for ensuring
that the nondeposit sales function is conducted in compliance with all
[[Page 30493]]
applicable laws, regulations, and policies. The contract should,
however, recognize that the credit union has the right to check for
compliance and may access member accounts for verification and
oversight.
Indemnification by the brokerage firm. Credit unions
policies should require a specific and unambiguous contractual
agreement from the brokerage firm to indemnify the credit union for any
monetary damages arising from nondeposit sales activities, including
but not limited to improper sales practices.
The roles of credit union employees. Credit union policies
should describe the roles of credit union employees in nondeposit
investment sales and the limits on their activities. The limits and
compensation for referrals must be consistent with SEC requirements.
The roles of brokerage firm employees. Credit union
policies should require the brokerage firm to provide the credit union
with a written document that explains the duties of its sales
representatives and gives the credit union the names, contact
information, and specific duties of those who will supervise the sales
representatives.
The location of nondeposit sales. Credit union policies
should describe where nondeposit sales may take place and how those
sales will be separated from deposit-taking activities.
The use of credit union member information. The credit
union's policies should describe the information that may be
transferred between the credit union and the brokerage firm or the
brokerage firm's sales representative. The policies and contracts
should describe how such information will be used and safeguarded and
the associated privacy notices to members. The policies and contract
terms must comply with NCUA's Privacy of Consumer Financial Information
Rule and NCUA's Security Program Rule. 12 CFR parts 716 and 748. The
brokerage firm must agree in writing to comply with the credit union's
policies on information practices.
Termination of the contract. The contract should contain a
provision that permits the credit union to terminate the contract for
both cause and for the convenience of the credit union. Failure by the
brokerage firm to adequately supervise its sales representative should
be included as a specific for-cause reason for contract termination.
Compliance with the requirements in this IRPS and
applicable law and regulation. Credit unions must maintain programs to
monitor compliance by the broker, its salespeople, and other entities
involved in the sales of nondeposit investments. Credit union personnel
performing the compliance function should be independent of any credit
union personnel involved in investment product sales and management. At
a minimum, the compliance function should include a system that
monitors member complaints; ensures supervisory personnel at the broker
make scheduled examinations of their sales personnel; and contacts
members that have purchased nondeposit investments to ensure they
received and understood the required disclosures. Compliance personnel
should also conduct periodic, random samplings of account activity to
look for evidence of abuse. When conducting sampling, compliance
personnel should look for evidence such as:
[cir] Accounts with a high rate of investment turnover, which may
indicate the sales representative is churning accounts to generate
commissions;
[cir] Accounts with complex investments that may be unsuitable for
the particular member; and
[cir] A combination of loan accounts and nondeposit investment
accounts that might indicate a member borrowed large sums of money from
the credit union to finance nondeposit investment purchases.
Credit unions should consult with qualified counsel for further
information about what to review when examining member accounts. The
intensity of the credit union's compliance effort will depend on the
nature and extent of nondeposit investment sales, evidence of the
effectiveness of the broker's compliance systems, and the level of
member complaints. Whether the credit union can obtain an unambiguous
indemnification agreement from the brokerage firm should also affect
the intensity of the compliance effort.
The Use of Dual Employees
Credit unions may establish a third party brokerage arrangement
using dual employees. These arrangements create additional risk for the
credit union and must be designed, operated, and monitored carefully.
Separation of duties. A dual employee should have
separate, written job descriptions for the duties performed for the
credit union and the nondeposit investment sales duties, which are
performed for the brokerage firm. The duties performed for the credit
union should be unrelated to the sale of nondeposit investments. The
duties performed for the credit union should not bring the employee
into contact with members that might also purchase nondeposit
investments. The dual employee should have no management or policy-
setting responsibilities within the credit union related to nondeposit
investments.
Separation of employment descriptions when interacting
with members. The dual employee should not use any materials that could
potentially confuse a member as to the capacity in which the dual
employee is functioning. For example, dual employees should use
separate business cards for their credit union and nondeposit
investment sales functions. Likewise, dual employees should use
separate stationary for nondeposit investment correspondence and credit
union correspondence and, when conducting nondeposit investment
business, dual employees should not reference their positions at the
credit union.
Dual employee compensation. The compensation a dual
employee receives for nondeposit investment activities may be paid
directly by the broker to the employee. Alternatively, the broker may
reimburse the credit union for the employee's nondeposit investment
activities. The credit union's records and the periodic earnings
statement provided to the employee should indicate how compensation is
divided between nondeposit investment work and work for the credit
union. A dual employee should also have written agreements with the two
employers establishing the amount of each employer's compensation to
the employee.
Indemnification. The use of dual employees increases the
risk a credit union may be held liable for abusive sales practices. At
the same time, the brokerage firm may have less incentive to supervise
nondeposit sales activities properly when conducted by a dual employee.
Accordingly, the credit union should seek an indemnification agreement
from the brokerage firm as described above. The credit union should
also seek fidelity bond coverage or additional insurance for any credit
union liability arising from employee misconduct related to the
nondeposit investment function.
Sales of Nondeposit Investments to Nonmembers
Because credit unions may only provide services to members, a
credit union may generally only accept income and pay expenses
associated with nondeposit investment sales to its members. NCUA
realizes, however, that in some cases it may be difficult for a credit
union to connect particular
[[Page 30494]]
income to a transaction involving a member. For example, some sales
representatives may have generated sales that occurred before the
representative joined the brokerage arrangement. These representatives
may bring with them a stream of trailer income that cannot now be
associated with any particular person or is not otherwise attributable
to members of the credit union. A similar situation may arise in
brokerage arrangements involving multiple credit unions working with
one broker and sales made to members of the various credit unions.
To address these situations, NCUA will allow a credit union in a
third party brokerage arrangement to accept a de minimus amount of
income that is not directly attributable to sales to its members. In
this context, de minimus means that the ratio of income not directly
attributable to members to the total gross income the credit union
receives under the arrangement cannot exceed five percent.
A similar issue may arise if a credit union pays expenses
associated with the sales of nondeposit investments. NCUA will allow a
credit union in a third party brokerage arrangement to pay a de minimus
amount of expenses associated with the sale of nondeposit investments
to nonmembers. In this context, de minimus means that the ratio of
nonmember sales expenses paid by the credit union to the total expenses
paid by the credit union under the arrangement cannot exceed five
percent.
VI. Applicable Law and Regulation
The Federal Credit Union Act, 12 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.
The Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, Sec. 3(a)(4), 15
U.S.C. 78a et seq.
Regulation B, Securities Activities of Banks and Other
Financial Institutions, 15 CFR 242.710 et seq.
NASD Rule 2350, Broker/Dealer Conduct on the Premises of
Financial Institutions.
NASD Rule 3040, Private Securities Transactions of an
Associated Person.
[FR Doc. 05-10381 Filed 5-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P