Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief from the Requirements of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 236, 29551-29552 [05-10281]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 98 / Monday, May 23, 2005 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Special Approval of
Alternate Standard
In accordance with § 238.21 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) received
a request for approval of an Alternate
Standard of compliance with certain
requirements of its safety standards. The
individual petition is described below,
including the party seeking relief, the
regulatory provisions involved, the
nature of the relief being requested, and
the petitioner’s arguments in favor of
relief.
American Public Transportation
Association
[Special Approval Petition Docket Number
FRA–2005–20853]
American Public Transportation
Association (APTA) seeks approval for
use of an alternate standard required to
be used in accordance with the
Passenger Equipment Safety Standards,
49 CFR Part 238. Section 311, single car
test of passenger equipment brakes.
Section 311(a) requires single car air
brake test on all passenger cars and all
unpowered vehicles used in passenger
trains shall be performed in accordance
with either APTA Standard SS–M–005–
98, ‘‘Code of Tests for Passenger Car
Equipment Using Single Car Testing
Device,’’ published March, 1998; or an
alternative procedure approved by FRA
pursuant to § 238.21. APTA requests
that the requirement refer to a revised
standard dated April 12, 2003, the
revisions require a railroad to perform
the single car test procedure at the same
working pressure as the car being tested
utilizes in revenue service. The March
1998 standards requires that the test be
performed at 90 psi while some trains
operate their brake systems at 110 psi.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. Each comment shall set forth
specifically the basis upon which it is
made, and contain a concise statement
of the interest of the commenter in the
proceeding. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:20 May 20, 2005
Jkt 205001
appropriate docket number (FRA–2005–
20853) and must be submitted to the
Docket Clerk, DOT Docket Management
Facility, Room PL–401 (Plaza Level),
400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590. Communications received within
45 days of the date of this notice will
be considered by FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after
that date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://dms.dot.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78). The
Statement may also be found at https://
dms.dot.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC on May 17,
2005.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 05–10283 Filed 5–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Application for Approval of
Discontinuance or Modification of a
Railroad Signal System or Relief from
the Requirements of Title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 236
Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 235 and 49
U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroad
has petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) seeking approval
for the discontinuance or modification
of the signal system or relief from the
requirements of 49 CFR part 236 as
detailed below.
Docket Number FRA–2005–21015
Applicants: Central, New York Railroad
Corporation, Mr. Nathan R. Fenno,
Executive Vice President, 1 Railroad
Avenue, Cooperstown, New York
13326.
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Mr.
Brian L. Sykes, Chief Engineer, C&S
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29551
Engineering, 99 Spring Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303.
The New York, Susquehanna and
Western Railway Corporation, Mr.
Richard J. Hensel, Vice President—
Engineering, 1 Railroad Avenue,
Cooperstown, New York 13326.
The Central New York Railroad
Corporation (CNYK), Norfolk Southern
Corporation (NS), and The New York,
Susquehanna and Western Railway
Corporation (NYSW) jointly seek
approval of the discontinuance and
removal of the interlocking, automatic
block signal, and traffic control systems,
on the single and double main tracks,
between CP Sparrow Bush, milepost
89.9, near Port Jervis, New York, and,
CP BD, milepost 213.0, near
Binghamton, New York, a distant of
approximately 123 miles. The proposed
changes consist of the following:
(1) Convert the all power-operated
and spring switches to hand operation;
(2) Modification of Signal 92E to fixed
approach for CP Sparrow Bush, and
modification of Signal 2SW at CP Coles
to a fixed approach for CP BD;
(3) Installation of a stick release timer
at River Lane MP 199.1; and
(4) Installation of a block signal
system to provide broken rail protection
on a five-mile section of track in the
area of Shohola.
The reason given for the proposed
change is that the online freight traffic
has dwindled to the point that there
were only seven active online shippers
in 2004. Since 1982, the line has been
used by NYSW solely for ‘‘overhead’’
traffic, i.e., the movement of rail cars
between NYSW’s New Jersey rail lines
and Central New York rail lines, and the
NYSW is a subsidiary of the Delaware
Otsego Corporation. In late in 2004, NS
and the Delaware Otsego Corporation
officials met to discuss the future of the
line. As a result of the discussion, NS
decided to lease the line to CNYK for
nominal consideration, if it undertook
the operation of the line, including
maintenance and payment of taxes, but
subject to a right to cancel if it is unable
to achieve its plan.
Any interested party desiring to
protest the granting of an application
shall set forth specifically the grounds
upon which the protest is made, and
include a concise statement of the
interest of the party in the proceeding.
Additionally, one copy of the protest
shall be furnished to the applicant at the
address listed above.
All communications concerning this
proceeding should be identified by the
docket number and must be submitted
to the Docket Clerk, DOT Central Docket
Management Facility, Room PL–401
(Plaza Level), 400 7th Street, SW.,
E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM
23MYN1
29552
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 98 / Monday, May 23, 2005 / Notices
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Communications received within 45
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by the FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after
that date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://dms.dot.gov.
FRA wishes to inform all potential
commenters that anyone is able to
search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–
78) or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
FRA expects to be able to determine
these matters without an oral hearing.
However, if a specific request for an oral
hearing is accompanied by a showing
that the party is unable to adequately
present his or her position by written
statements, an application may be set
for public hearing.
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 17,
2005.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 05–10281 Filed 5–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Application for Approval of
Discontinuance or Modification of a
Railroad Signal System or Relief From
the Requirements of Title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 236
Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 235 and 49
U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroad
has petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) seeking approval
for the discontinuance or modification
of the signal system or relief from the
requirements of 49 CFR part 236 as
detailed below.
Docket Number FRA–2005–21017
Applicant: CSX Transportation,
Incorporated, Mr. N. Michael Choat,
Chief Engineer, Communications and
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:20 May 20, 2005
Jkt 205001
Signal, 4901 Belfort Road, Suite 130,
Jacksonville, Florida 32256.
CSX Transportation, Incorporated
seeks approval of the proposed
discontinuance and removal of the
traffic control system, on the single
main track and sidings, between
Berkeley Run Jct., milepost BUC 0.0,
near Grafton, West Virginia and
Hampton Jct., milepost BUC 41.9, near
Adrian, West Virginia, on the
Huntington Division East, Cowen
Subdivision, a distance of
approximately 42 miles. The proposed
changes consist of the conversion of all
power-operated switches to hand
operation, conversion of the method of
operation to Other Than Main Track
(Rule 96), and authorization of the
speed of all trains under Rule 46. In
addition, all highway-rail grade crossing
warning systems will be retained.
The reason given for the proposed
changes is that current traffic density
does not warrant retention of the signal
system.
Any interested party desiring to
protest the granting of an application
shall set forth specifically the grounds
upon which the protest is made, and
include a concise statement of the
interest of the party in the proceeding.
Additionally, one copy of the protest
shall be furnished to the applicant at the
address listed above.
All communications concerning this
proceeding should be identified by the
docket number and must be submitted
to the Docket Clerk, DOT Central Docket
Management Facility, Room PL–401
(Plaza Level), 400 7th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Communications received within 45
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by the FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after
that date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://dms.dot.gov.
FRA wishes to inform all potential
commenters that anyone is able to
search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–
78) or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FRA expects to be able to determine
these matters without an oral hearing.
However, if a specific request for an oral
hearing is accompanied by a showing
that the party is unable to adequately
present his or her position by written
statements, an application may be set
for public hearing.
Issued in Washington, DC on May 17,
2005.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 05–10280 Filed 5–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Application for Approval of
Discontinuance or Modification of a
Railroad Signal System or Relief From
the Requirements of Title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 236
Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Part 235 and 49
U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroad
has petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) seeking approval
for the discontinuance or modification
of the signal system or relief from the
requirements of 49 CFR part 236 as
detailed below.
Docket Number FRA–2005–20898
Applicant: CSX Transportation,
Incorporated, Mr. N. Michael Choat,
Chief Engineer, Communications and
Signal, 4901 Belfort Road, Suite 130,
Jacksonville, Florida 32256.
CSX Transportation (CSXT) seeks
approval to extend the temporary
discontinuance of the automatic block
signal (ABS) system, near Winter Park,
Florida, between milepost MPA 784.7
and milepost MPA 791.7, on the
Jacksonville Division, Sanford
Subdivision, for a period not to exceed
one year. The request is associated with
the August 13 and September 5, 2004
catastrophic events, in which CSXT
experienced severe weather events,
Hurricane Charlie and Hurricane
Frances, which devastated most of the
existing pole line in the area. The
extensive pole line damage resulted in
the suspension of the ABS system, as
authorized by Title 49 CFR,
§ 235.7(a)(4), and the implementation of
Track Warrant Control/Direct Traffic
Control Rules, under the direction of the
train dispatcher, to govern train
movements.
The reason given for the proposed
changes is that all grade crossing
warning devices are now operational on
E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM
23MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 98 (Monday, May 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29551-29552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-10281]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or
Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief from the
Requirements of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 236
Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 235 and
49 U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroad has petitioned the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) seeking approval for the discontinuance
or modification of the signal system or relief from the requirements of
49 CFR part 236 as detailed below.
Docket Number FRA-2005-21015
Applicants: Central, New York Railroad Corporation, Mr. Nathan R.
Fenno, Executive Vice President, 1 Railroad Avenue, Cooperstown, New
York 13326.
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Mr. Brian L. Sykes, Chief Engineer,
C&S Engineering, 99 Spring Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303.
The New York, Susquehanna and Western Railway Corporation, Mr.
Richard J. Hensel, Vice President--Engineering, 1 Railroad Avenue,
Cooperstown, New York 13326.
The Central New York Railroad Corporation (CNYK), Norfolk Southern
Corporation (NS), and The New York, Susquehanna and Western Railway
Corporation (NYSW) jointly seek approval of the discontinuance and
removal of the interlocking, automatic block signal, and traffic
control systems, on the single and double main tracks, between CP
Sparrow Bush, milepost 89.9, near Port Jervis, New York, and, CP BD,
milepost 213.0, near Binghamton, New York, a distant of approximately
123 miles. The proposed changes consist of the following:
(1) Convert the all power-operated and spring switches to hand
operation;
(2) Modification of Signal 92E to fixed approach for CP Sparrow
Bush, and modification of Signal 2SW at CP Coles to a fixed approach
for CP BD;
(3) Installation of a stick release timer at River Lane MP 199.1;
and
(4) Installation of a block signal system to provide broken rail
protection on a five-mile section of track in the area of Shohola.
The reason given for the proposed change is that the online freight
traffic has dwindled to the point that there were only seven active
online shippers in 2004. Since 1982, the line has been used by NYSW
solely for ``overhead'' traffic, i.e., the movement of rail cars
between NYSW's New Jersey rail lines and Central New York rail lines,
and the NYSW is a subsidiary of the Delaware Otsego Corporation. In
late in 2004, NS and the Delaware Otsego Corporation officials met to
discuss the future of the line. As a result of the discussion, NS
decided to lease the line to CNYK for nominal consideration, if it
undertook the operation of the line, including maintenance and payment
of taxes, but subject to a right to cancel if it is unable to achieve
its plan.
Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of an
application shall set forth specifically the grounds upon which the
protest is made, and include a concise statement of the interest of the
party in the proceeding. Additionally, one copy of the protest shall be
furnished to the applicant at the address listed above.
All communications concerning this proceeding should be identified
by the docket number and must be submitted to the Docket Clerk, DOT
Central Docket Management Facility, Room PL-401 (Plaza Level), 400 7th
Street, SW.,
[[Page 29552]]
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Communications received within 45 days of
the date of this notice will be considered by the FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after that date will be considered
as far as practicable. All written communications concerning these
proceedings are available for examination during regular business hours
(9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the above facility. All documents in the public
docket are also available for inspection and copying on the Internet at
the docket facility's Web site at https://dms.dot.gov.
FRA wishes to inform all potential commenters that anyone is able
to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
FRA expects to be able to determine these matters without an oral
hearing. However, if a specific request for an oral hearing is
accompanied by a showing that the party is unable to adequately present
his or her position by written statements, an application may be set
for public hearing.
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 17, 2005.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. 05-10281 Filed 5-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
