Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest; California and Nevada; Great Basin South Rangeland Project Analysis, 29272-29273 [05-9878]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
29272
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 97 / Friday, May 20, 2005 / Notices
for information by contacting persons
and organizations on the District’s
mailing list, by publishing a notice the
local newspapers, and by posting flyers
at key locations within and nearby the
Fishbone project area. No public
meetings are planned at this time.
Electronic Access to Information:
Information is available electronically
on the Forest Web page: https://
www.fs.fed.us/r9/cnnf/—click on
‘‘Natural Resources’’, then ‘‘Fishbone
Project’’. Send electronic comments to:
comments-eastern-chequamegonnicolet-washburn@fs.fed.us. When
sending electronic comments, please
reference the Fishbone Project in the
subject line. In addition, include your
name and address.
Comment Requested: This notice of
intent initiates the scoping proces
which guides the development of the
environmental impact statement.
Although comments are welcome
throughout the analysis process, your
comments would be most useful if
received by June 15, 2005. Everyone
who provides comments will be
periodically updated during the course
of the Fishbone Project regarding its
development, as well as receive a copy
of the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement in order to review the results
of our analysis.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft
environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment
period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from
the date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register. The
Forest Service believes, at this early
stage, it is important to give reviewers
notice of several court rulings related to
public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:07 May 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
action participate by the close of the 45
day comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: May 10, 2005.
Anne F. Archie,
Forest Supervisor, Chequamegon-Nicolet
National Forest.
[FR Doc. 05–10078 Filed 5–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest;
California and Nevada; Great Basin
South Rangeland Project Analysis
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Bridgeport Ranger
District, Humboldt-Toiyabe National
Forest will prepare an environmental
impact statement (EIS) on a proposal to
authorize continued livestock grazing
on National Forest System lands east of
Bridgeport, California. The project area
is located in portions of Mineral and
Lyon counties, Nevada, and portions of
Mono County, California. The analysis
will determine if a change in
management direction for livestock
grazing is needed to move existing
resource conditions towards desired
conditions. The Conway, East Walker,
Huntoon, Larkin Lake, Masonic, Aurora,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Nine Mile, Powell Mountain, Rough
Creek, Whiskey Flat, and Wild Horse
Allotments would continue to have
authorized grazing. Squaw Creek
Allotment would continue to be vacant.
Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received within
30 days from the date this notice is
published in the Federal Register. The
draft environmental impact statement is
expected in September, 2005 and the
final environmental impact statement is
expected in December, 2005.
DATES:
Send written comments to
District Ranger, Bridgeport Ranger
District, HCR 1 Box 1000, Bridgeport,
California 93517.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dave Loomis, Project Manager, Carson
Ranger District, 1536 S. Carson Street,
Carson City, Nevada 89701.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
There is a need to maintain or
improve the overall health of the
rangeland in the project area. The
purpose of this project is to determine
the management direction for livestock
grazing needed to move existing
resource conditions within the project
area towards desired conditions.
Proposed Action
The Bridgeport Ranger District,
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, is
proposing to authorize continued cattle
grazing on the 410,000 acre Great Basin
South area under updated grazing
management direction in order to move
existing rangeland resource conditions
within the project area toward desired
condition. The updated direction will
be incorporated in attendant grazing
permits and allotment management
plans to guide grazing management
within the project area during the
coming decade, or until amendments
are warranted based on changed
condition.
Possible Alternatives
In addition to the proposed action,
two additional alternatives have been
tentatively identified for analysis in the
EIS:
1. No Action Alternative: Continue
current grazing management.
2. No Grazing Alternative: Do not
issue new grazing permits when existing
permits expire.
Responsible Official
Forest Supervisor, Humboldt-Toiyabe
National Forest, 1200 Franklin Way,
Sparks, NV 89431.
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 97 / Friday, May 20, 2005 / Notices
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Based on the environmental analysis
in the EIS, the Forest Supervisor will
decide whether or not to continue
grazing on the allotments within the
Great Basin South Project area in
accordance with the standards in the
proposed action or as modified by
additional mitigation measures and
monitoring requirements.
Scoping Process
The Forest Service will mail
information to interested parties. Public
involvement will be ongoing throughout
the analysis process and at certain times
public input will be specifically
requested. There are currently no
scoping meetings planned.
Preliminary Issues
The following are some potential
issues identified through internal Forest
Service scoping based on our experience
with similar projects. The list is not
considered all-inclusive, but should be
viewed as a starting point. We are
asking you to help us further refine the
issues and identify other issues or
concerns relevant to the proposed
project.
• Continued livestock grazing has the
potential to adversely affect the health
of riparian vegetation.
• Continued livestock grazing has the
potential to adversely affect the health
of rangeland vegetation.
• Continued livestock grazing has the
potential to adversely affect sage grouse
habitat.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft
environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment
period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from
the date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, that at
this early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions
(Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 [1978]).
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:07 May 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
Also, environmental objections that
could be raised at the draft
environmental impact statement stage,
but that are not raised until after
completion of the final environmental
impact statement, may be waived or
dismissed by the courts (City of Angoon
v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 [9th Cir.
1986] and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v.
Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 [E.D.
Wis. 1980]). Because of these court
rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45 day
comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement, or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: May 12, 2005.
Randall M. Sharp,
Natural Resources Staff Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–9878 Filed 5–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
National Urban and Community
Forestry Advisory Council
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Urban and
Community Forestry Advisory Council
will meet in Albuquerque, New Mexico,
June 27–29, 2005. The purpose of the
meeting is to discuss emerging issues in
urban and community forestry.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29273
The meeting will be held June
27–29, 2005.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Hyatt Regency Hotel, 330 Tijeras,
NW., Albuquerque, NM 87102.
Individuals who wish to speak at the
meeting or to propose agenda items
must send their names and proposals to
Suzanne M. del Villar, Executive
Assistant, National Urban and
Community Forestry Advisory Council,
P.O. Box 1003, Sugarloaf, CA 92386–
1003. Individuals may fax their names
and proposed agenda items to (909)
585–9527.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne M. del Villar, Urban and
Community Forestry Staff, (909) 585–
9268.
DATES:
The
meeting is open to the public. Council
discussion is limited to Forest Service
staff and Council members; however,
persons who wish to bring urban and
community forestry matters to the
attention of the Council may file written
statements with the Council staff before
or after the meeting. Public input
sessions will be provided.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: May 10, 2005.
Robin L. Thompson,
Associate Deputy Chief, State and Private
Forestry.
[FR Doc. 05–10084 Filed 5–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Trinity County Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Trinity County Resource
Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet at
the Trinity County Office of Education
in Weaverville, California, June 13,
2005. The purpose of this meeting is to
discuss proposed projects under Title II
of the Secure Rural Schools and
Community Self-Determination Act of
2000.
June 13, 2005.
Trinity County Office of
Education, 201 Memorial Drive,
Weaverville, California.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael R. Odle, Assistant Public
Affairs Officer and RAC Coordinator.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting is open to the pubic. Public
input sessions will be provided and
individuals will have the opportunity to
DATES:
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 97 (Friday, May 20, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29272-29273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-9878]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest; California and Nevada; Great
Basin South Rangeland Project Analysis
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bridgeport Ranger District, Humboldt-Toiyabe National
Forest will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) on a
proposal to authorize continued livestock grazing on National Forest
System lands east of Bridgeport, California. The project area is
located in portions of Mineral and Lyon counties, Nevada, and portions
of Mono County, California. The analysis will determine if a change in
management direction for livestock grazing is needed to move existing
resource conditions towards desired conditions. The Conway, East
Walker, Huntoon, Larkin Lake, Masonic, Aurora, Nine Mile, Powell
Mountain, Rough Creek, Whiskey Flat, and Wild Horse Allotments would
continue to have authorized grazing. Squaw Creek Allotment would
continue to be vacant.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
within 30 days from the date this notice is published in the Federal
Register. The draft environmental impact statement is expected in
September, 2005 and the final environmental impact statement is
expected in December, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to District Ranger, Bridgeport Ranger
District, HCR 1 Box 1000, Bridgeport, California 93517.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Loomis, Project Manager, Carson
Ranger District, 1536 S. Carson Street, Carson City, Nevada 89701.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
There is a need to maintain or improve the overall health of the
rangeland in the project area. The purpose of this project is to
determine the management direction for livestock grazing needed to move
existing resource conditions within the project area towards desired
conditions.
Proposed Action
The Bridgeport Ranger District, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest,
is proposing to authorize continued cattle grazing on the 410,000 acre
Great Basin South area under updated grazing management direction in
order to move existing rangeland resource conditions within the project
area toward desired condition. The updated direction will be
incorporated in attendant grazing permits and allotment management
plans to guide grazing management within the project area during the
coming decade, or until amendments are warranted based on changed
condition.
Possible Alternatives
In addition to the proposed action, two additional alternatives
have been tentatively identified for analysis in the EIS:
1. No Action Alternative: Continue current grazing management.
2. No Grazing Alternative: Do not issue new grazing permits when
existing permits expire.
Responsible Official
Forest Supervisor, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, 1200 Franklin
Way, Sparks, NV 89431.
[[Page 29273]]
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Based on the environmental analysis in the EIS, the Forest
Supervisor will decide whether or not to continue grazing on the
allotments within the Great Basin South Project area in accordance with
the standards in the proposed action or as modified by additional
mitigation measures and monitoring requirements.
Scoping Process
The Forest Service will mail information to interested parties.
Public involvement will be ongoing throughout the analysis process and
at certain times public input will be specifically requested. There are
currently no scoping meetings planned.
Preliminary Issues
The following are some potential issues identified through internal
Forest Service scoping based on our experience with similar projects.
The list is not considered all-inclusive, but should be viewed as a
starting point. We are asking you to help us further refine the issues
and identify other issues or concerns relevant to the proposed project.
Continued livestock grazing has the potential to adversely
affect the health of riparian vegetation.
Continued livestock grazing has the potential to adversely
affect the health of rangeland vegetation.
Continued livestock grazing has the potential to adversely
affect sage grouse habitat.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal
Register.
The Forest Service believes, that at this early stage, it is
important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to
public participation in the environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 [1978]). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage, but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement, may
be waived or dismissed by the courts (City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 [9th Cir. 1986] and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 [E.D. Wis. 1980]). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45 day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement, or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: May 12, 2005.
Randall M. Sharp,
Natural Resources Staff Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-9878 Filed 5-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
