Security Zone Regulations; St. Croix, United States Virgin Islands, 29200-29202 [05-10046]

Download as PDF 29200 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 97 / Friday, May 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [CGD07–05–042] RIN 1625–AA87 Security Zone Regulations; St. Croix, United States Virgin Islands Coast Guard, DHS. Temporary final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone in the vicinity of the HOVENSA refinery facility in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. This security zone extends approximately 2 miles seaward from the HOVENSA facility waterfront area along the south coast of the island of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. This security zone is needed for national security reasons to protect the public and the HOVENSA facility from potential subversive acts. Vessels without scheduled arrivals must receive permission from the U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port San Juan prior to entering this temporary security zone. DATES: This rule is effective from May 15, 2005, until November 15, 2005. ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket, are part of docket [CGD07–05– 042] and are available for inspection or copying at Sector San Juan, 5 Calle La Puntilla, San Juan, Puerto Rico between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Junior Grade Katiuska Pabon, Sector San Juan, Puerto Rico at (787) 729–2376. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulatory Information We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. Publishing an NPRM and delaying the rule’s effective date would be contrary to the public interest. Immediate action is needed to protect the public, ports and waterways of the United States from potential subversive acts against the HOVENSA facility. For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Similar regulations were published in the Federal Register on January 17, 2002 (67 FR 2332), September 13, 2002 VerDate jul<14>2003 12:14 May 19, 2005 Jkt 205001 (67 FR 57952), April 28, 2003 (68 FR 22296), July 10, 2003 (68 FR 41081), February 10, 2004 (69 FR 6150), May 21, 2004 (69 FR 29232), and January 19, 2005 (70 FR 2950). We did not receive any comments on these regulations. The Captain of the Port San Juan has determined that due to the continued risk, the need for the security zone persists. On February 10, 2005, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking to make this security zone permanent (70 FR 7065). While the Coast Guard intends to publish a final rule to ensure the security of this waterfront facility, this temporary rule is required in the interim. Background and Purpose The Coast Guard recognizes that subversive activity could be launched by vessels or persons in close proximity to the HOVENSA refinery on St. Croix, USVI, against tank vessels and the waterfront facility. Given the highly volatile nature of the substances stored at the HOVENSA facility, this security zone is necessary to decrease the risk of subversive activity launched against the HOVENSA facility. The Captain of the Port San Juan is reducing this risk by prohibiting all vessels without a scheduled arrival from coming within approximately 2 miles of the HOVENSA facility, unless specifically permitted by the Captain of the Port San Juan or a designated representative. The Captain of the Port San Juan can be reached on VHF Marine Band Radio, Channel 16 (156.8 Mhz), or by calling (787) 289– 2040, 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week. The HOVENSA Facility Port Captain can be reached on VHF Marine Band Radio channel 11 (156.6 Mhz) or by calling (340) 692–3488, 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week. Discussion of Rule The temporary security zone around the HOVENSA facility encompasses all waters within a line connecting the following coordinates: 17°41′31″ N, 64°45′09″ W, to 17°39′36″ N, 64°44′12″ W, to 17°40′00″ N, 64°43′36″ W, to 17°41′48″ N, 64°44′25″ W, and back to the beginning point. All vessels without a scheduled arrival into the HOVENSA facility are prohibited from coming within this security zone-that extends approximately 2 mile seaward from the facility, unless specifically permitted by the Captain of the Port San Juan or a designated representative. Regulatory Evaluation This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). This security zone covers an area that is not typically used by commercial vessel traffic, including fishermen, and vessels may be allowed to enter the zone on a case by case basis with the permission of the Captain of the Port San Juan or a designated representative. Small Entities Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered whether this rule would have a significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small entities. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be small entities: owners of small charter fishing or diving operations that may operate near the HOVENSA facility. This security zone will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This zone covers an area that is not typically used by commercial fishermen, and vessels may be allowed to enter the zone on a caseby-case basis with the permission of the Captain of the Port San Juan. Assistance for Small Entities Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we offer to assist small entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If the rule will affect your small business, organization, or government jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT for assistance in understanding this rule. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM 20MYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 97 / Friday, May 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency’s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. Collection of Information This rule calls for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520). Federalism A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for federalism. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. Taking of Private Property This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. Civil Justice Reform This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. Protection of Children We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not create an environmental risk to VerDate jul<14>2003 12:14 May 19, 2005 Jkt 205001 health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect children. Indian Tribal Governments This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Energy Effects We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a significant energy action under that order, because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211. Technical Standards The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 29201 2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further environmental documentation. Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, an Environmental Analysis Check List and a Categorical Exclusion Determination (CED) are not required for this rule. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: I PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 2. From May 15, 2005, to November 15, 2005, add a new § 165.T07–042 to read as follows: I § 165.T07–042 Security Zone; HOVENSA Refinery, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. (a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All waters from surface to bottom, encompassed within a line connecting the following coordinates: 17°41′31″ N, 64°45′09″ W, to 17°39′36″ N, 64°44′12″ W, to 17°40′00″ N, 64°43′36″ W, to 17°41′48″ N, 64°44′25″ W, and then back to the point of origin. (b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in § 165.33 of this part, with the exception of vessels that have an arrival scheduled with the HOVENSA Facility, no vessel may enter the regulated area unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) San Juan or a Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer designated by COTP San Juan. The Captain of the Port will notify the public of any changes in the status of this zone by Marine Safety Radio Broadcast on VHF Marine Band Radio, Channel 16 (156.8 Mhz). The Captain of the Port San Juan can be reached on VHF Marine Band Radio, Channel 16 (156.8 Mhz) or by calling (787) 289–2040, 24-hours-aday, 7-days-a-week. The HOVENSA Facility Port Captain can be reached on VHF Marine Band Radio channel 11 (156.6 Mhz) or by calling (340) 692– 3488, 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week. E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM 20MYR1 29202 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 97 / Friday, May 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations (c) Dates. This section is effective from May 15, 2005, until November 15, 2005. Federal, State, or local agencies in enforcing these safety zones. unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designee. The Captain of the Port may be assisted by other Federal, State, or local agencies in enforcing these safety zones. D.P. Rudolph, Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, San Juan. [FR Doc. 05–10046 Filed 5–19–05; 8:45 am] Dated: May 11, 2005. Paul D. Jewell, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Portland, OR. [FR Doc. 05–10140 Filed 5–19–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P BILLING CODE 4910–15–P Dated: May 11, 2005. Paul D. Jewell, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Portland, OR. [FR Doc. 05–10141 Filed 5–12–05; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BILLING CODE 4915–01–P Coast Guard Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 33 CFR Part 165 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [CGD13–05–015] [CGD13–05–016] 40 CFR Part 52 RIN 1625–AA00 RIN 1625–AA00 [R05–OAR–2004–MI–0004; FRL–7915–8] Safety Zones: Columbia River, Astoria, OR Safety Zones: Fort Vancouver Fireworks Display, Columbia River, Vancouver, WA AGENCY: Approval and Promulgation of Maintenance Plans; Michigan; Southeast Michigan Ozone Maintenance Plan Update to the State Implementation Plan ACTION: AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of enforcement. AGENCY: ACTION: The Captain of the Port, Portland, Oregon, will enforce the safety zone established for the Astoria Regatta on the waters of the Columbia River. This action is being taken to safeguard watercraft and their occupants from safety hazards associated with the display of fireworks. Entry into these safety zones is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port. DATES: This rule will be enforced on August 13, 2005, from 9:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Petty Officer Charity Keuter, c/o Captain of the Port Portland, OR, 6767 North Basin Avenue, Portland, OR 97217 at (503) 240–2590 to obtain information concerning enforcement of this rule. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 17, 2003, the Coast Guard published a final rule (68 FR 42289) establishing regulations in 33 CFR 165.1316 to safeguard watercraft and their occupants on the waters of the Columbia River from safety hazards associated with the display of fireworks within the Area of Responsibility of the Captain of the Port, Portland, Oregon. The Coast Guard is issuing notice that the Captain of the Port, Portland, Oregon will enforce on August 13, 2005, from 9:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. the safety zone established on the waters of the Columbia River in the vicinity of Astoria, Oregon and published in 33 CFR 165.1316. Entry into this safety zone is prohibited unless otherwise exempted or excluded under the final rule or unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designee. The Captain of the Port may be assisted by other SUMMARY: VerDate jul<14>2003 12:14 May 19, 2005 Jkt 205001 Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of enforcement. SUMMARY: The Captain of the Port, Portland, Oregon, will enforce the safety zone established for the Fort Vancouver Fireworks Display, Vancouver, WA on the waters of the Columbia River on July 4, 2005. The Captain of the Port, Portland, Oregon, is taking this action to safeguard watercraft and their occupants from safety hazards associated with the display of fireworks. Entry into this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port. DATES: This rule will be enforced on July 4, 2005, from 9:30 p.m. to 11 p.m. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Petty Officer Charity Keuter, c/o Captain of the Port Portland, OR 6767 North Basin Avenue, Portland, OR 97217 at (503) 240–2590 to obtain information concerning enforcement of this rule. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 28, 2003 the Coast Guard published a final rule (68 FR 31609) establishing regulations in 33 CFR 165.1314 to safeguard watercraft and their occupants on the waters of the Columbia River in the vicinity of Vancouver, WA from safety hazards associated with the display of fireworks within the Area of Responsibility of the Captain of the Port, Portland, Oregon. The Coast Guard is issuing notice that the Captain of the Port, Portland, Oregon on July 4, 2005, from 9:30 p.m. to 11 p.m. will enforce the established safety zones on the waters of the Columbia River between the Interstate 5 Bridge and channel buoy RG F1(1+2)R 6s published at 33 CFR 165.1314. Entry into this safety zone is prohibited unless otherwise exempted or excluded under the final rule or PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. SUMMARY: EPA is approving a December 19, 2003, request from Michigan to revise the ground level ozone State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Southeast Michigan area. EPA originally approved the Southeast Michigan ozone maintenance plan on April 6, 1995. This action approves an update to the plan prepared by Michigan to maintain the 1hour national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for ozone in the Southeast Michigan maintenance area through the year 2015. This update is required by the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This ‘‘direct final’’ rule is effective July 19, 2005, unless EPA receives written adverse comment by June 20, 2005. If written adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by Regional Material in EDocket (RME) ID No. R05–OAR–2004– MI–0004, by one of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. Agency Web site: https:// docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME, EPA’s electronic public docket and comments system, is EPA’s preferred method for receiving comments. Once in the system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key in the appropriate RME Docket identification number. Follow the E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM 20MYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 97 (Friday, May 20, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29200-29202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-10046]



[[Page 29200]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[CGD07-05-042]
RIN 1625-AA87


Security Zone Regulations; St. Croix, United States Virgin 
Islands

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone in 
the vicinity of the HOVENSA refinery facility in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin 
Islands. This security zone extends approximately 2 miles seaward from 
the HOVENSA facility waterfront area along the south coast of the 
island of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. This security zone is needed 
for national security reasons to protect the public and the HOVENSA 
facility from potential subversive acts. Vessels without scheduled 
arrivals must receive permission from the U.S. Coast Guard Captain of 
the Port San Juan prior to entering this temporary security zone.

DATES: This rule is effective from May 15, 2005, until November 15, 
2005.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in 
the docket, are part of docket [CGD07-05-042] and are available for 
inspection or copying at Sector San Juan, 5 Calle La Puntilla, San 
Juan, Puerto Rico between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Junior Grade Katiuska 
Pabon, Sector San Juan, Puerto Rico at (787) 729-2376.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this 
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. Publishing an NPRM and 
delaying the rule's effective date would be contrary to the public 
interest. Immediate action is needed to protect the public, ports and 
waterways of the United States from potential subversive acts against 
the HOVENSA facility.
    For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard 
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 
30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Similar regulations 
were published in the Federal Register on January 17, 2002 (67 FR 
2332), September 13, 2002 (67 FR 57952), April 28, 2003 (68 FR 22296), 
July 10, 2003 (68 FR 41081), February 10, 2004 (69 FR 6150), May 21, 
2004 (69 FR 29232), and January 19, 2005 (70 FR 2950). We did not 
receive any comments on these regulations.
    The Captain of the Port San Juan has determined that due to the 
continued risk, the need for the security zone persists. On February 
10, 2005, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking to 
make this security zone permanent (70 FR 7065). While the Coast Guard 
intends to publish a final rule to ensure the security of this 
waterfront facility, this temporary rule is required in the interim.

Background and Purpose

    The Coast Guard recognizes that subversive activity could be 
launched by vessels or persons in close proximity to the HOVENSA 
refinery on St. Croix, USVI, against tank vessels and the waterfront 
facility. Given the highly volatile nature of the substances stored at 
the HOVENSA facility, this security zone is necessary to decrease the 
risk of subversive activity launched against the HOVENSA facility. The 
Captain of the Port San Juan is reducing this risk by prohibiting all 
vessels without a scheduled arrival from coming within approximately 2 
miles of the HOVENSA facility, unless specifically permitted by the 
Captain of the Port San Juan or a designated representative. The 
Captain of the Port San Juan can be reached on VHF Marine Band Radio, 
Channel 16 (156.8 Mhz), or by calling (787) 289-2040, 24-hours-a-day, 
7-days-a-week. The HOVENSA Facility Port Captain can be reached on VHF 
Marine Band Radio channel 11 (156.6 Mhz) or by calling (340) 692-3488, 
24-hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week.

Discussion of Rule

    The temporary security zone around the HOVENSA facility encompasses 
all waters within a line connecting the following coordinates: 
17[deg]41'31'' N, 64[deg]45'09'' W, to 17[deg]39'36'' N, 64[deg]44'12'' 
W, to 17[deg]40'00'' N, 64[deg]43'36'' W, to 17[deg]41'48'' N, 
64[deg]44'25'' W, and back to the beginning point. All vessels without 
a scheduled arrival into the HOVENSA facility are prohibited from 
coming within this security zone-that extends approximately 2 mile 
seaward from the facility, unless specifically permitted by the Captain 
of the Port San Juan or a designated representative.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not 
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the 
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS). This security zone covers an area that is not typically 
used by commercial vessel traffic, including fishermen, and vessels may 
be allowed to enter the zone on a case by case basis with the 
permission of the Captain of the Port San Juan or a designated 
representative.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic effect 
upon a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which 
may be small entities: owners of small charter fishing or diving 
operations that may operate near the HOVENSA facility. This security 
zone will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities for the following reasons. This zone covers an 
area that is not typically used by commercial fishermen, and vessels 
may be allowed to enter the zone on a case-by-case basis with the 
permission of the Captain of the Port San Juan.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate 
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If the 
rule will affect your small business, organization, or government 
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or 
options for compliance, please contact the person listed under FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT for assistance in understanding this rule.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman

[[Page 29201]]

and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 
Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's 
responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by 
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The 
Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or 
complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we 
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a significant 
energy action under that order, because it is not a significant 
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have 
a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of 
energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy action. 
Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under 
Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have 
concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit the 
use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction. 
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, 
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further environmental 
documentation. Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, 
an Environmental Analysis Check List and a Categorical Exclusion 
Determination (CED) are not required for this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.


0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 
CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. 
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. From May 15, 2005, to November 15, 2005, add a new Sec.  165.T07-042 
to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T07-042  Security Zone; HOVENSA Refinery, St. Croix, U.S. 
Virgin Islands.

    (a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All waters 
from surface to bottom, encompassed within a line connecting the 
following coordinates: 17[deg]41'31'' N, 64[deg]45'09'' W, to 
17[deg]39'36'' N, 64[deg]44'12'' W, to 17[deg]40'00'' N, 64[deg]43'36'' 
W, to 17[deg]41'48'' N, 64[deg]44'25'' W, and then back to the point of 
origin.
    (b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.33 of this part, with the exception of vessels that have an 
arrival scheduled with the HOVENSA Facility, no vessel may enter the 
regulated area unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the 
Port (COTP) San Juan or a Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty 
officer designated by COTP San Juan. The Captain of the Port will 
notify the public of any changes in the status of this zone by Marine 
Safety Radio Broadcast on VHF Marine Band Radio, Channel 16 (156.8 
Mhz). The Captain of the Port San Juan can be reached on VHF Marine 
Band Radio, Channel 16 (156.8 Mhz) or by calling (787) 289-2040, 24-
hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week. The HOVENSA Facility Port Captain can be 
reached on VHF Marine Band Radio channel 11 (156.6 Mhz) or by calling 
(340) 692-3488, 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week.

[[Page 29202]]

    (c) Dates. This section is effective from May 15, 2005, until 
November 15, 2005.

D.P. Rudolph, Commander,
U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, San Juan.
[FR Doc. 05-10046 Filed 5-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.