Public Federal Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Hearing; Region V Small Business Regulatory Fairness Board, 28974-28975 [05-9972]
Download as PDF
28974
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Notices
change by granting accelerated approval
to Amendment No. 3, and solicits
comments from interested persons on
Amendment No. 3.
II. Description of the Proposal
Currently, Article IV, Section 2, of the
Exchange’s By-Laws provides that no
application shall be made by the
Exchange to the Commission for the
extension of unlisted trading privileges
with respect to any security unless the
issuer of the security meets the
requirements for listing on the Exchange
that are set forth in Section 1.3 of
Article IV. It further provides that in the
event that an issuer whose security has
been the subject of a grant of unlisted
trading privileges to the Exchange
ceases to meet the listing requirements
of Section 1.3, the Exchange shall
terminate such unlisted trading. An
exception is provided that permits the
Exchange to seek and continue unlisted
trading privileges on any security for
which the primary trading market is the
New York Stock Exchange or the
American Stock Exchange.
The proposed rule change, as
amended by Amendment No. 3, would
broaden the ability of the Exchange to
extend unlisted trading privileges by
revising Article IV, Section 2, simply to
state: ‘‘Notwithstanding the
requirements for listing set forth in
Section 1.3 of this Article IV, the
Exchange may seek and continue
unlisted trading privileges on any
security as to which unlisted trading
privileges may be extended in
accordance with Section 12(f) of the Act
and the rules thereunder.’’ 5
III. Discussion
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change, as
amended, is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
a national securities exchange.6 In
particular, the Commission believes that
the proposed rule change, as amended,
is consistent with section 6(b)(5) and
section 12(f) of the Act 7 in that it
5 The italicized text reflects Amendment No. 3 to
the proposed rule change. The original proposal, as
published in the Notice, used the phrase ‘‘as to
which unlisted trading privileges have been granted
pursuant to section 12(f) of the Act.’’
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). In approving this proposal, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition and capital
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5) and 15 U.S.C. 78l(f). Section
6(b)(5) requires that the rules of an exchange be
designed, among other things, to facilitate
transactions in securities, to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free
and open market and a national market system, and,
VerDate jul<14>2003
22:14 May 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
permits the Exchange to extend unlisted
trading privileges to the extent
permitted by section 12(f) and the rules
thereunder.8
The Exchange has requested that the
Commission grant accelerated approval
to Amendment No. 3 to the proposed
rule change. The Commission believes
that Amendment No. 3 improves the
text of the proposed rule change by
revising it to mirror the terminology of
the statute and to include a reference to
the rules thereunder. Acceleration of the
amendment will permit the Exhange to
implement the proposed rule change
without further delay. The Commission
therefore finds good cause, consistent
with Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,9 to
approve Amendment No. 3 to the
proposed rule change prior to the
thirtieth day after the date of
publication of notice of filing thereof in
the Federal Register.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning Amendment No.
3, including whether the Amendment is
consistent with the Act. Comments may
be submitted by any of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CSE–2003–06 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549–0609.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CSE–2003–06. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
in general, to protect investors and the public
interest, and not permit unfair discrimination
among issuers. Section 12(f) sets forth the
requirements in accordance with which a national
securities exchange may extend unlisted trading
privileges.
8 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission notes that, among other things, the
extension of unlisted trading privileges is subject to
Rule 12f–5, which prohibits a national securities
exchange from extending unlisted trading privileges
to a security unless the exchange has in effect a rule
or rules providing for transactions in the class or
type of security to which the exchange extends
unlisted trading privileges. 17 CFR 240.12f–5.
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the NSX. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CSE–
2003–06 and should be submitted on or
before June 9, 2005.
V. Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent
with the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a
national securities exchange.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act,10 that the
remaining portion of the proposed rule
change (SR–CSE–2003–06), as amended,
be, and hereby is, approved, and that
Amendment No. 3 to the proposed rule
change be, and hereby is, approved on
an accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–2503 Filed 5–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Public Federal Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Hearing; Region
V Small Business Regulatory Fairness
Board
The U.S. Small Business
Administration, Region V Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Board and
the SBA Office of the National
10 15
11 17
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
19MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Notices
Ombudsman will hold a public hearing
on Friday, June 3, 2005, at 8:30 a.m. The
public hearing will be held at the Rock
Valley College ‘‘Woodward Technology
Center, 3301 North Mulford Road, Room
117, Rockford, IL 61114, phone (815)
921–2081, to receive comments and
testimony from small business owners,
small government entities, and small
non-profit organizations concerning
regulatory enforcement and compliance
actions taken by federal agencies.
Anyone wishing to attend or to make
a presentation must contact Gary Peele,
in writing or by fax, in order to be put
on the agenda. Gary Peele, Supervisory
Marketing Specialist, SBA Illinois
District Office, 500 West Madison
Street, Chicago, IL 60661, phone (312)
353–7353, fax (202) 481–2031, e-mail:
gary.peele@sba.gov.
For more information, see our Web
site at https://www.sba.gov/ombudsman.
Matthew K. Becker,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–9972 Filed 5–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
RIN: 3245–AF21
Small Business Innovation Research
Program Policy Directive
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice of proposed amendments
to Policy Directive.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document proposes
amendments to the Small Business
Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
Policy Directive. These proposed
amendments reflect the requirements
that the Executive Order, Encouraging
Innovation in Manufacturing, imposes
on the Small Business Administration
(SBA) and the Federal agencies that
participate in the SBIR program. This
document also provides guidelines and
directives to Federal agencies for the
general conduct of the program as it
relates to implementing the Executive
Order.
DATES: Public comments on the
proposed amendments to the SBIR
Policy Directive must be received on or
before June 20, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 3245–AF21, by any of
the following methods. (1) The Federal
eRulemaking portal:
www.regulations.gov; (2) e-mail at
technology@sba.gov (include RIN in the
subject line of the message); (3) mail,
addressed to Edsel M. Brown, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator for Technology,
VerDate jul<14>2003
22:14 May 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
Office of Technology, Office of Policy,
Planning, and Liaison; Office of
Government Contracting and Business
Development, U.S. Small Business
Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20416.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edsel M. Brown, Jr., Office of
Technology, Office of Policy, Planning,
and Liaison, Office of Government
Contracting and Business Development,
at (202) 205–6450 or at
technology@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1982,
Congress enacted the Small Business
Innovation Development Act of 1982
(SBIDA), Public Law 97–219 (codified at
15 U.S.C. 638), which established the
SBIR Program. The statutory purpose of
the Small Business Innovation Research
(SBIR) Program is to strengthen the role
of innovative small business concerns
(SBCs) in Federally-funded research and
research and development (R/R&D).
The SBIR Program is a phased
process, uniform throughout the Federal
Government, of soliciting proposals and
awarding funding agreements for R/R&D
to meet stated agency needs or missions.
To stimulate and foster scientific and
technological innovation, including
increasing commercialization of Federal
R/R&D, the program must follow a
uniform competitive process of three
phases: Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III.
SBIDA requires the SBA to ‘‘issue
Policy Directives for the general conduct
of the SBIR programs within the Federal
Government.’’ 15 U.S.C. 638(j)(1). SBA
proposes to amend the most recent SBIR
Policy Directive which was published
on September 24, 2002, at 67 FR 60072–
60098.
On February 24, 2004, the President
signed Executive Order 13329,
‘‘Encouraging Innovation in
Manufacturing.’’ The purpose of the
Executive Order is to ensure that
Federal Government agencies and
departments properly and effectively
assist the private sector in its
manufacturing innovation efforts
through the use of the SBIR and the
Small Business Transfer Technology
(STTR) Programs. Pursuant to the
Executive Order, the SBA is required to:
(1) Establish, after consultation with
the Director of the Office of Science and
Technology Policy (OSTP), formats and
schedules for submission of reports by
the heads of departments and agencies;
and (2) issue to departments and
agencies guidelines and directives (in
addition to the formats and schedules)
as the SBA Administrator determines
from time to time are necessary to
implement the Executive Order, after
such guidelines and directives are
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28975
submitted to the President, through the
Director of OSTP, and are approved by
the President.
In addition, the Executive Order
requires the heads of the agencies and
departments with one or more SBIR or
STTR programs to perform the
following: (1) To the extent permitted by
law and in a manner consistent with the
mission of that department or agency,
give high priority within such programs
to manufacturing-related research and
development to advance innovation in
manufacturing through small business;
and (2) to submit reports annually to the
Administrator of the SBA and the
Director of the OSTP concerning the
efforts of such departments or agencies
in implementing the Executive Order.
SBA proposes to amend the SBIR Policy
Directive in order to fulfill its
responsibilities under Executive Order
13329 and to provide the guidelines and
requirements that the participating
agencies and departments need to
implement the provisions of the
Executive Order as set forth above.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 2 of the SBIR Policy Directive
contains a summary of the legislative
provisions applicable to the SBIR
Program. SBA is proposing to amend
this section to include an overview of
the requirements imposed by Executive
Order 13329 and to amend the section
heading to more accurately reflect the
scope of the section.
Section 3 of the SBIR Policy Directive
sets forth definitions pertinent to the
SBIR program. SBA proposes to add a
definition for ‘‘Manufacturing-related’’
research and development. The
definition was initially developed by
the OSTP, the National Institute of
Standards and Technology, and the
National Science Foundation and was
reviewed by the National Science and
Technology Council. The definition
encompasses research and development
that improves existing methods or
processes, including machine
technologies, systems technologies, and
environmental or societal technologies.
In addition, to facilitate the proper
placement of this new definition, it will
be necessary to redesignate several
paragraphs in section 3.
Section 4 of the Policy Directive
includes a description of the structure
and purpose of Phases I, II, and III of the
SBIR Program and the standards for
evaluating grant proposals. In section
4(a)(2) of the Policy Directive, SBA is
proposing to add that agencies may, to
the extent permitted by law, give
additional consideration to
manufacturing-related proposals.
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 96 (Thursday, May 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28974-28975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-9972]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Public Federal Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Hearing; Region V
Small Business Regulatory Fairness Board
The U.S. Small Business Administration, Region V Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Board and the SBA Office of the National
[[Page 28975]]
Ombudsman will hold a public hearing on Friday, June 3, 2005, at 8:30
a.m. The public hearing will be held at the Rock Valley College ``
Woodward Technology Center, 3301 North Mulford Road, Room 117,
Rockford, IL 61114, phone (815) 921-2081, to receive comments and
testimony from small business owners, small government entities, and
small non-profit organizations concerning regulatory enforcement and
compliance actions taken by federal agencies.
Anyone wishing to attend or to make a presentation must contact
Gary Peele, in writing or by fax, in order to be put on the agenda.
Gary Peele, Supervisory Marketing Specialist, SBA Illinois District
Office, 500 West Madison Street, Chicago, IL 60661, phone (312) 353-
7353, fax (202) 481-2031, e-mail: gary.peele@sba.gov.
For more information, see our Web site at https://www.sba.gov/ ombudsman.
Matthew K. Becker,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-9972 Filed 5-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P