Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension, 28937-28943 [05-10026]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Notices
Authority: Federal Advisory committee
Act. Pub. L. 92–463.
Dated: May 16, 2005.
Charles Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–9971 Filed 5–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610–01–M
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisition of Shares of Bank or Bank
Holding Companies
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12
CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank
holding company. The factors that are
considered in acting on the notices are
set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12
U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The notices are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices
also will be available for inspection at
the office of the Board of Governors.
Interested persons may express their
views in writing to the Reserve Bank
indicated for that notice or to the offices
of the Board of Governors. Comments
must be received not later than June 2,
2005.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
(Andre Anderson, Vice President) 1000
Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia
30303:
1. Allen Tabor Tomlinson, Carrie
Tomlinson Weeks, Robert Sanders
Tomlinson, Jr., and Marie Joy Poulet
Tomlinson, all of Opelousas, Louisiana;
to acquire additional voting shares of St.
Landry Bancshares, Inc., Opelousas,
Louisiana, and thereby indirectly
acquire voting shares of St. Landry Bank
& Trust Company, St. Landry,
Louisiana.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, May 13, 2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05–9950 Filed 5–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
VerDate jul<14>2003
22:25 May 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The application also will be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Additional information on all bank
holding companies may be obtained
from the National Information Center
website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than June 13, 2005.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
(Andre Anderson, Vice President) 1000
Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia
30303:
1. Tombigbee Bancshares, Inc., Sweet
Water, Alabama; to become a bank
holding company by acquiring 100
percent of the voting shares of Sweet
Water State Bank, Sweet Water,
Alabama.
B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
(Patrick M. Wilder, Assistant Vice
President) 230 South LaSalle Street,
Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
1. First Busey Corporation, Urbana,
Illinois; to acquire 100 percent of the
voting shares of Tarpon Coast Bancorp,
Inc., Port Charlotte, Florida, and thereby
indirectly acquire Tarpon Coast
National Bank, Port Charlotte, Florida.
2. North Star Financial Holdings, Inc.,
Bloomfield, Michigan; to become a bank
holding company by acquiring 100
percent of the voting shares of N Star
Community Bank (in organization),
Bingham Farms, Michigan.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, May 13, 2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05–9949 Filed 5–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28937
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Notice of Proposals to Engage in
Permissible Nonbanking Activities or
to Acquire Companies that are
Engaged in Permissible Nonbanking
Activities
The companies listed in this notice
have given notice under section 4 of the
Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C.
1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12
CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to
acquire or control voting securities or
assets of a company, including the
companies listed below, that engages
either directly or through a subsidiary or
other company, in a nonbanking activity
that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y
(12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has
determined by Order to be closely
related to banking and permissible for
bank holding companies. Unless
otherwise noted, these activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Each notice is available for inspection
at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.
The notice also will be available for
inspection at the offices of the Board of
Governors. Interested persons may
express their views in writing on the
question whether the proposal complies
with the standards of section 4 of the
BHC Act. Additional information on all
bank holding companies may be
obtained from the National Information
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding the applications must be
received at the Reserve Bank indicated
or the offices of the Board of Governors
not later than June 2, 2005.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of New
York (Jay Bernstein, Bank Supervision
Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York,
New York 10045-0001:
1. NSB Holding Corp., Staten Island,
New York; to engage de novo through its
subsidiary Check Depot, State Island,
New York, in the issuance of money
orders, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(13)
of Regulation Y.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, May 13, 2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05–9951 Filed 5–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Extension
Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘FTC’’).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
28938
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Notices
SUMMARY: The information collection
requirements described below will be
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for review, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (‘‘PRA’’) (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
FTC is seeking public comments on its
proposal to extend through August 31,
2008, the current Paperwork Reduction
Act clearances for information
collection requirements contained in
four Commission rules and one
clearance covering the Commission’s
administrative activities. Those
clearances expire on August 31, 2005.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before July 18, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments.
Comments should refer to ‘‘Paperwork
Comment: FTC File No. P822108’’ to
facilitate the organization of comments.
A comment filed in paper form should
include this reference both in the text
and on the envelope and should be
mailed or delivered to the following
address: Federal Trade Commission/
Office of the Secretary, Room H–159
(Annex J), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20580. The FTC
is requesting that any comment filed in
paper form be sent by courier or
overnight service, if possible, because
U.S. postal mail in the Washington area
and at the Commission is subject to
delay due to heightened security
precautions. Alternatively, comments
may be filed in electronic form (in
ASCII format, WordPerfect, or Microsoft
Word) as part of or as an attachment to
e-mail messages directed to the
following e-mail box:
PaperworkComment@ftc.gov. If the
comment contains any material for
which confidential treatment is
requested, it must be filed in paper
form, and the first page of the document
must be clearly labeled ‘‘Confidential.’’1
The FTC Act and other laws the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. All timely and responsive
public comments will be considered by
the Commission and will be available to
the public on the FTC Web site, to the
extent practicable, at https://www.ftc.gov.
As a matter of discretion, the FTC makes
every effort to remove home contact
1 Commission Rule 4.2(d), 16 CFR 4.2(d). The
comment must be accompanied by an explicit
request for confidential treatment, including the
factual and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the comment to be
withheld from the public record. The request will
be granted or denied by the Commission’s General
Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the
public interest. See Commission Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR
4.9(c).
VerDate jul<14>2003
22:14 May 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
information for individuals from the
public comments it receives before
placing those comments on the FTC
Web site. More information, including
routine uses permitted by the Privacy
Act, may be found in the FTC’s privacy
policy at https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/
privacy.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the proposed information
requirements should be addressed as
follows:
For the Negative Option Rule, contact
Edwin Rodriguez, Attorney, Division of
Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer
Protection, Federal Trade Commission,
600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326–3147.
For the Amplifier Rule, contact Neil
Blickman, Attorney, Division of
Enforcement, Federal Trade
Commission, Bureau of Consumer
Protection, 600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326–3038.
For the Franchise Rule, contact
Steven Toporoff, Attorney, Division of
Marketing Practices, Bureau of
Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326–
3135.
For the R-Value Rule, contact
Hampton Newsome, Attorney, Division
of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer
Protection, Federal Trade Commission,
600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326–2889.
For the Administrative Activities
clearance, contact J. Ronald Brooke Jr.,
Attorney, Division of Planning and
Information, Bureau of Consumer
Protection, Federal Trade Commission,
600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Rm. H–
155, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326–
3484.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA, federal agencies must obtain
approval from OMB for each collection
of information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ means
agency requests or requirements that
members of the public submit reports,
keep records, or provide information to
a third party. 44 U.S.C. 3502(3), 5 CFR
1320.3(c). As required by section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the FTC is
providing this opportunity for public
comment before requesting that OMB
extend the existing paperwork clearance
for the Negative Option Rule, 16 CFR
Part 425 (OMB Control Number 3084–
0104); the Amplifier Rule, 16 CFR Part
432 (OMB Control Number 3084–0105);
the Franchise Rule, 16 CFR Part 436
(OMB Control Number 3084–0107); the
R-Value Rule, 16 CFR Part 460 (OMB
Control Number 3084–0109); and the
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Administrative Activities Clearance
(OMB Control Number 3084–0047).
The FTC invites comments on: (1)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
1. The Negative Option Rule, 16 CFR
Part 425 (OMB Control Number: 3084–
0104)
The Negative Option Rule governs the
operation of prenotification subscription
plans. Under these plans, sellers ship
merchandise, such as books, compact
discs, or tapes, automatically to their
subscribers and bill them for the
merchandise if consumers do not
expressly reject the merchandise within
a prescribed time. The Rule protects
consumers by: (a) requiring that
promotional materials disclose the
terms of membership clearly and
conspicuously; and (b) establishing
procedures for the administration of
such ‘‘negative option’’ plans.
Estimated annual hours burden:
15,000 hours.
Staff estimates that approximately 190
existing clubs require annually about 75
hours each to comply with the Rule’s
disclosure requirements, for a total of
14,250 hours (190 clubs x 75 hours).
These clubs should be familiar with the
Rule, which has been in effect since
1974, with the result that the burden of
compliance has declined over time.
Moreover, a substantial portion of the
existing clubs likely would make these
disclosures absent the Rule because they
have helped foster long-term
relationships with consumers.
Approximately 5 new clubs come into
being each year. These clubs require
approximately 120 hours to comply
with the Rule, including start up-time.
Thus, cumulative PRA burden for new
clubs is about 600 hours. Combined
with the estimated burden for
established clubs, total burden is 14,850
hours or 15,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand.
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Notices
Estimated annual cost burden:
$490,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand (solely related to labor costs).
Based on recent data from the Bureau
of Labor Statistics, the average
compensation for advertising managers
is approximately $36 per hour.
Compensation for clerical personnel is
approximately $13 per hour. Assuming
that managers perform the bulk of the
work, while clerical personnel perform
associated tasks (e.g., placing
advertisements and responding to
inquiries about offerings or prices), the
total cost to the industry for the Rule’s
paperwork requirements would be
approximately $489,750 [(65 hours
managerial time × 190 existing negative
option plans × $36 per hour) + (10 hours
clerical time × 190 existing negative
option plans × $13 per hour) + (110
hours managerial time × 5 new negative
option plans × $36 per hour) + (10 hours
clerical time × 5 new negative option
plans × $13)].
Because the Rule has been in effect
since 1974, the vast majority of the
negative option clubs have no current
start-up costs. For the few new clubs
that enter the market each year, the
costs associated with the Rule’s
disclosure requirements, beyond the
additional labor costs discussed above,
are de minimis. Negative option clubs
already have access to the ordinary
office equipment necessary to achieve
compliance with the Rule. Similarly, the
Rule imposes few, if any, printing and
distribution costs. The required
disclosures generally constitute only a
small addition to the materials that a
prospective subscriber sends to the
seller to solicit enrollment in a negative
option plan. Because printing and
distribution expenditures are incurred
regardless of the Rule to market the
product, adding the required disclosures
to them would result in marginal
incremental expense.
2. The Amplifier Rule, 16 CFR Part 432
(OMB Control Number: 3084–0105)
The Amplifier Rule assists consumers
by standardizing the measurement and
disclosure of power output and other
performance characteristics of
amplifiers in stereos and other home
entertainment equipment. The Rule also
specifies the test conditions necessary to
make the disclosures that the Rule
requires.
Estimated annual hours burden: 450
hours (300 testing-related hours; 150
disclosure-related hours).
The Rule’s provisions require affected
entities to test the power output of
amplifiers in accordance with a
specified FTC protocol. The staff
estimates that approximately 300 new
VerDate jul<14>2003
22:14 May 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
amplifiers and receivers come on the
market each year. High fidelity
manufacturers routinely conduct
performance tests as part of any new
product development. As a result, the
Rule imposes incremental costs only to
the extent that the FTC protocol is more
time-consuming than alternative testing
procedures. Specifically, a warm up
(‘‘precondition’’) period that the Rule
requires before measurements are taken
may add approximately one hour to the
time testing entails. Thus, staff estimates
that the Rule imposes approximately
300 hours (1 hour x 300 new products)
of added testing burden annually.
The Rule requires disclosures if a
media advertisement makes a power
output claim or if a manufacturer
specification sheet and product
brochure for a covered product make a
power output claim. This requirement
does not impose any additional costs on
manufacturers because, absent the Rule,
media advertisements, as well as
manufacturer specification sheets and
product brochures, simply would
contain a power specification obtained
using an alternative to the Rule-required
testing protocol. The Rule, though, also
requires disclosure of harmonic
distortion, power bandwidth, and
impedance ratings in manufacturer
specification sheets and product
brochures. The staff’s research suggests
that approximately 300 new amplifiers
and receivers are introduced each year.
The cost of disclosing the ancillary
distortion, bandwidth, and impedance
information in the potentially 600 new
specification sheets and brochures
produced each year for those products
(300 × 2) is limited to the time needed
to draft and review the language
pertaining to the aforementioned
specifications. Because this Rule
became effective in 1974 and because
members of the industry are familiar
with its requirements, compliance is
less burdensome today. Accordingly,
staff continues to estimate the time
involved for this task to be a maximum
of 1⁄4 hour for each new specification
sheet and brochure (600 × .25 hours), for
a total annual burden of 150 hours. The
total annual burden imposed by the
Rule, therefore, is approximately 450
burden hours for testing and
disclosures.
Estimated annual cost burden:
$16,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand (solely relating to labor costs).
Based on recent data from the Bureau
of Labor Statistics, the average hourly
compensation for electronics engineers
is about $36, and the average hourly
compensation for advertising and
promotions managers is about $36.
Generally, electronics engineers perform
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28939
the testing of amplifiers and receivers
(300 hours × $36 = $10,800), and
advertising or promotions managers
prepare product brochures and
manufacturer specification sheets
(including required disclosures) (150
hours × $36 = $5,400). Based on this
information, staff estimates industry
labor costs associated with the Rule of
approximately $16,000 per year,
rounded to the nearest thousand.
The Rule imposes no capital or other
non-labor costs because its requirements
are incidental to testing and advertising
done in the ordinary course of business.
3. The Franchise Rule, 16 CFR Part 436
(OMB Control Number: 3084–0107)
The Franchise Rule requires
franchisors and franchise brokers to
furnish to prospective investors a
disclosure document that provides
information relating to the franchisor,
the franchisor’s business, the nature of
the proposed franchise relationship, as
well as additional information about
any claims concerning actual or
potential sales, income, or profits for a
prospective franchisee (‘‘financial
performance claims’’). The franchisor
must also preserve the information that
forms a reasonable basis for such claims.
The FTC is seeking to extend the PRA
clearance for the existing Rule. In
addition, the FTC is seeking PRA
clearance for the rule changes that have
been proposed in the ongoing
rulemaking proceeding.
Estimated annual hours burden for
existing Franchise Rule: 33,500 hours.
The Rule’s required disclosure
document provides franchisees with
information on broad-ranging subjects
that affect franchisors and the nature of
the proposed franchise relationship.
This includes not only generally
available information, such as the
official name and address and principal
place of business of the franchisor, but
also less commonly available
information, such as, among other
things, the previous five years business
experience of a franchisor’s current
directors and executive officers and
whether any of these individuals have
been convicted of a felony or fraud or
have filed for bankruptcy or been
adjudged bankrupt during the previous
seven years. All information in the
disclosure statement must be updated
and revised according to the express
time requirements set forth in the Rule.
Based on a review of the trade
publications and information from state
regulatory authorities, staff believes
that, on average, from year to year, there
are approximately 5,000 American
franchise systems, consisting of 2,500
business format franchises and 2,500
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
28940
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Notices
business opportunity sellers, with
approximately 500 (or 10%) of the total
reflecting new entrants who have
replaced departing businesses. Staff has
calculated burden based on the above
estimates. Some franchisors, however,
for various reasons, are not covered by
the Rule in certain situations (e.g., when
a franchisee buys bona fide inventory
but pays no franchisor fees). Moreover,
fifteen states have franchise disclosure
laws similar to the Rule. These states
use a disclosure document format
known as the Uniform Franchise
Offering Circular (‘‘UFOC’’). In order to
ease compliance burdens on the
franchisor, the Commission has
authorized use of the UFOC in lieu of
its own disclosure format to satisfy the
Rule’s disclosure requirements. Staff
estimates that about 95 percent of all
franchisors use the UFOC format. When
that format is used, the franchisor is not
required to prepare an additional federal
disclosure document. The burden hours
stated below reflects staff’s estimate of
the incremental burden that the
Franchise Rule may impose beyond
information requirements imposed by
states and/or followed by franchisors
who use the UFOC.
Staff estimates that the 500 or so new
franchisors (including business
opportunity ventures) require
approximately 30 hours each to develop
a Rule-compliant disclosure document.
Staff additionally estimates that the
remaining 4,500 established franchisors
require no more than approximately 3
hours each to update the disclosure
document. The combined cumulative
burden is 28,500 hours.
The franchisor may require additional
recordkeeping of information pertaining
to the sale of franchises in nonregistration states. At most, franchisors
would require an additional hour of
recordkeeping per year. This yields a
cumulative total of 5,000 hours per year
for affected entities.
Estimated annual cost burden for
existing rule: $7,190,000.
Labor costs are determined by
applying applicable wage rates to
associated burden hours. Staff assumes
that an attorney likely would prepare or
update the disclosure document.
Accordingly, staff’s estimate of the labor
costs attributed to those tasks are as
follows: (500 new franchisors × $250 per
hour × 30 hours per franchisor) + (4,500
established franchisors × $250 per hour
× 3 hours per franchisor) = $7,125,000.
Staff anticipates that recordkeeping
would be performed by clerical staff at
approximately $13 per hour. At 5,000
hours per year for all affected entities,
this would amount to a total cost of
$65,000. Thus, combined labor costs for
VerDate jul<14>2003
22:14 May 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
recordkeeping and disclosure is
approximately $7,190,000.
Estimated increase in annual hours
burden for proposed rule amendments:
2750 hours.
The Commission has begun a
rulemaking proceeding to amend the
Franchise Rule. 64 FR 57294 (1999)
(Notice of Proposed Rulemaking). The
Staff Report on the Proposed Revised
Franchise Rule (Aug. 25, 2004) (‘‘Staff
Report’’), which is available online at
https://www.ftc.gov, sets forth the staff’s
recommendations to the Commission on
various proposed amendments to the
Franchise Rule. The Commission did
not review or approve the staff report
prior to its issuance. See 69 FR 53661
(2004) (Notice Announcing Publication
of Staff Report). Among other things, the
Rule amendments discussed in the Staff
Report would accomplish five goals.
First, the staff has recommended that
the amended Rule address the sale of
business format and product franchises
exclusively. The existing requirements
for business opportunity ventures
would be renumbered as a separate rule
limited to business opportunities only.
See Staff Report at 13 and n.42.
Accordingly, the burden for business
opportunity ventures will remain the
same.
Second, the amended Rule would
reduce inconsistencies between federal
and state disclosure requirements.
Fifteen states have franchise disclosure
laws similar to the Rule. These states
use a disclosure document format
known as the Uniform Franchise
Offering Circular (‘‘UFOC’’). Staff
estimates that about 95 percent of all
franchisors use the UFOC format. The
amended Rule would incorporate nearly
all of the UFOC disclosures, thereby
harmonizing federal and state disclosure
laws.
Third, the amended Rule would
require the disclosure of more
information on the quality of the
franchise relationship. Among other
things, franchisors would disclose
litigation initiated against franchisees
involving the franchise relationship and
franchisee-specific trademark
associations.
Fourth, the amended Rule would
update the rule to address new
technologies. Specifically, it would
permit franchisors to furnish disclosures
electronically. This includes
transmission via CD ROM, e-mail, and
access to a Web site.
Finally, the amended Rule would
reduce compliance costs by expanding
exemptions from disclosure.
Specifically, the amended Rule would
create new exemptions for sophisticated
investors and for sales to managers and
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
others within the franchise system who
are already familiar with the franchise
system’s operations.
At the same time, the amended Rule
would increase franchisor’s
recordkeeping obligations. Specifically,
a franchisor would be required to retain
copies of receipts for disclosure
documents, as well as materially
different versions of its disclosure
documents. Such recordkeeping
requirements, however, are consistent
with, or less burdensome, than those
imposed by the states.
Staff estimates the increase in burden
attributable to the proposed Rule
amendments as follows: Each year,
approximately 250 new franchisors will
require 32 hours each (2 hours more
than under the existing Rule) to develop
a Rule-compliant disclosure document
(increase of 500 hours). Staff also
estimates that during the first year that
the amended Rule is effective, the
remaining 2250 established franchisors
will require approximately 6 hours each
(3 hours more than under the existing
Rule) to update their existing disclosure
document to comply with the amended
Rule (increase of 6750 hours for the first
year). After the first year, however, the
time required should be the same as
under the existing Rule, as the new
disclosure format becomes familiar.
Accordingly, the increase in the annual
disclosure burden, averaged over the
three-year clearance period, will be
2750 hours (500 hours per year for new
franchisors + 2250 hours per year for
established franchisors).
Estimated increase in annual cost
burden for proposed rule amendments:
$688,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand.
Labor costs are determined by
applying applicable wage rates to
associated burden hours. Staff assumes
that an attorney likely would prepare
the disclosure document. Accordingly,
staff’s estimate of the increase in labor
costs that would be attributable to the
proposed Rule amendments, averaged
over the three-year clearance period, is
as follows: (500 hours per year for new
franchisors × $250 per hour) + (2250
hours per year for established
franchisors × $250) = $687,500.
4. R-value Rule, 16 CFR Part 460 (OMB
Control Number: 3084–0109)
The R-value Rule establishes uniform
standards for the substantiation and
disclosure of accurate, material product
information about the thermal
performance characteristics of home
insulation products. The R-value of an
insulation signifies the insulation’s
degree of resistance to the flow of heat.
This information tells consumers how
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Notices
well a product is likely to perform as an
insulator and allows consumers to
determine whether the cost of the
insulation is justified.
Estimated annual hours burden:
121,000 hours.
The Rule’s requirements include
product testing, recordkeeping, and
third-party disclosures on labels, fact
sheets, advertisements, and other
promotional materials. Based on
information provided by members of the
insulation industry, staff estimates that
the Rule affects: (1) 150 insulation
manufacturers and their testing
laboratories; (2) 1,615 installers who sell
home insulation; (3) 125,000 new home
builders/sellers of site-built homes and
approximately 5,500 dealers who sell
manufactured housing; and (4) 25,000
retail sellers who sell home insulation
for installation by consumers.
Under the Rule’s testing requirements,
manufacturers must test each insulation
product for its R-value. The test takes
approximately 2 hours. Approximately
15 of the 150 insulation manufacturers
in existence introduce one new product
each year. The total annual testing
burden is therefore approximately 30
hours (15 manufacturers × 2 hours per
test).
Staff further estimates that most
manufacturers require an average of
approximately 20 hours per year with
regard to third-party disclosure
requirements in advertising and other
promotional materials. Only the five or
six largest manufacturers require
additional time, approximately 80 hours
each. Thus, the annual third-party
disclosure burden for manufacturers is
approximately 3,360 hours [(144
manufacturers × 20 hours) + (6
manufacturers × 80 hours)].
While the Rule imposes
recordkeeping requirements, most
manufacturers and their testing
laboratories keep their testing-related
records in the ordinary course of
business. Staff estimates that no more
than one additional hour per year per
manufacturer is necessary to comply
with this requirement, for an annual
recordkeeping burden of approximately
150 hours (150 manufacturers × 1 hour).
Installers are required to show the
manufacturers’ insulation fact sheet to
retail consumers before purchase. They
must also disclose information in
contracts or receipts concerning the Rvalue and the amount of insulation to
install. Staff estimates that two minutes
per sales transaction is sufficient to
comply with these requirements.
Approximately 1,520,000 retrofit
insulations are installed by
approximately 1,615 installers per year,
and, thus, the related annual burden
VerDate jul<14>2003
22:14 May 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
total is approximately 50,667 hours
(1,520,000 sales transactions × 2
minutes). Staff anticipates that one hour
per year per installer is sufficient to
cover required disclosures in
advertisements and other promotional
materials. Thus, the burden for this
requirement is approximately 1,615
hours per year (1,615 installers × 1
hour). In addition, installers must keep
records that indicate the substantiation
relied upon for savings claims. The
additional time to comply with this
requirement is minimal—approximately
5 minutes per year per installer—for a
total of approximately 135 hours (1,615
installers × 5 minutes).
New home sellers must make contract
disclosures concerning the type,
thickness, and R-value of the insulation
they install in each part of a new home.
Staff estimates that no more than 30
seconds per sales transaction is required
to comply with this requirement, for a
total annual burden of approximately
14,167 hours (1.7 million new home
sales × 30 seconds). New home sellers
who make energy savings claims must
also keep records regarding the
substantiation relied upon for those
claims. Because few new home sellers
make these claims, and the ones that do
would likely keep these records
regardless of the R-value Rule, staff
believes that the 30 seconds covering
disclosures would also encompass this
recordkeeping element.2
The Rule requires that the
approximately 25,000 retailers who sell
home insulation make fact sheets
available to consumers before purchase.
This can be accomplished by, for
example, placing copies in a display
rack or keeping copies in a binder on a
service desk with an appropriate notice.
Replenishing or replacing fact sheets
should require no more than
approximately one hour per year per
retailer, for a total of 25,000 annual
hours, industry-wide.
The Rule also requires specific
disclosures in advertisements or other
promotional materials to ensure that the
claims are fair and not deceptive. This
burden is very minimal because retailers
typically use advertising copy provided
by the insulation manufacturer, and
2 In previous requests for clearance under the
PRA, the FTC staff assumed that the requirements
related to new home sales contracts require one
minute per sales transaction. See, e.g., 67 FR 21243,
21246 (April 30, 2002). The FTC staff now estimates
that the inclusion of such information should take
no more than 30 seconds per sales transaction
because of increased automation, the wide-spread
use of standard contracts, and the prevalence of
large firms in the housing market. In addition, there
was a calculation error in the previous requests that
significantly overestimated the total burden
imposed by new home sale contract disclosures.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28941
even when retailers prepare their own
advertising copy, the Rule provides
some of the language to be used.
Accordingly, approximately one hour
per year per retailer should suffice to
meet this requirement, for a total annual
burden of approximately 25,000 hours.
Retailers who make energy savings
claims in advertisements or other
promotional materials must keep
records that indicate the substantiation
they are relying upon. Because few
retailers make these types of
promotional claims and because the
Rule permits retailers to rely on the
insulation manufacturer’s substantiation
data for any claims that are made, the
additional recordkeeping burden is de
minimis. The time calculated for
disclosures, above, would be more than
adequate to cover any burden imposed
by this recordkeeping requirement.
To summarize, staff estimates that the
Rule imposes a total of 120,624 burden
hours, as follows: 150 recordkeeping
and 3,390 testing and disclosure hours
for manufacturers; 135 recordkeeping
and 52,282 disclosure hours for
installers; 14,667 disclosure hours for
new home sellers; and 50,000 disclosure
hours for retailers. Rounded to the
nearest thousand, the total burden is
121,000 burden hours.
Estimated annual cost burden:
$2,738,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand (solely related to labor costs).
The total annual labor costs for the
Rule’s information collection
requirements is $2,737,902, derived as
follows: $690 for testing, based on 30
hours for manufacturers (30 hours × $23
per hour for skilled technical
personnel); $3,705 for complying with
the recordkeeping requirements of the
Rule, based on 285 hours (285 hours ×
$13 per hour for clerical personnel);
$43,680 for manufacturers’ compliance
with third-party disclosure
requirements, based on 3,360 hours
(3,360 hours × $13 per hour for clerical
personnel); and $2,689,827 for
compliance by installers, new home
sellers, and retailers (116,949 hours ×
$23 per hour for sales persons).
There are no significant current
capital or other non-labor costs
associated with this Rule. Because the
Rule has been in effect since 1980,
members of the industry are familiar
with its requirements and already have
in place the equipment for conducting
tests and storing records. New products
are introduced infrequently. Because the
required disclosures are placed on
packaging or on the product itself, the
Rule’s additional disclosure
requirements do not cause industry
members to incur any significant
additional non-labor associated costs.
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
28942
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Notices
5. FTC Administrative Activities (OMB
Control Number: 3084–0047)
This category consists of: (a)
Applications to the Commission,
including applications and notices
contained in the Commission’s Rules of
Practice (primarily Parts I, II, and IV);
(b) the FTC’s Consumer Response
Center; (c) FTC staff review of
Commission divestiture orders in
merger cases; and (d) Applicant
Background Form.
Estimated annual hours burden:
115,000 hours, rounded to the nearest
thousand.
(a) Applications to the Commission,
Including Applications and Notices
Contained in the Commission’s Rules of
Practice: 125 Hours
Most applications to the Commission
generally fall within the ‘‘law
enforcement’’ exception to the
Paperwork Reduction Act.3 Over the last
decade, the Commission has received
only one application for an exemption
under the Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act provisions. Staff has estimated that
such a submission can be completed
well within 50 hours. Applications and
notices to the Commission contained in
other rules (generally in Parts I, II, and
IV of the Commission’s Rule of Practice)
are also infrequent and difficult to
quantify. Nonetheless, in order to cover
any potential ‘‘collections of
information’’ for which separate
clearance has not been sought, staff is
projecting 125 hours as its estimate of
the time needed to submit any
applicable responses.4
(b) Complaint Systems: 114,300 Hours
Consumer Response Center
Consumers can submit complaints
about fraud and other practices to the
FTC’s Consumer Response Center by
telephone or through the FTC’s Web
site. Telephone complaints and
inquiries to the FTC are answered both
by FTC staff and contractors. These
telephone counselors ask for the same
information that consumers would enter
on the applicable forms available on the
FTC’s Web site. For telephone inquiries
and complaints, the FTC staff estimates
that it takes 4.5 minutes per call to
3 The ‘‘law enforcement’’ exception to the PRA
excludes most items in this subcategory because
they involve collecting information during the
conduct of a Federal investigation, civil action,
administrative action, investigation, or audit with
respect to a specific party, or subsequent
adjudicative or judicial proceedings designed to
determine fines or other penalties. See 44 U.S.C.
3518(c)(1); 5 CFR 1320.4(a)(1)–(3).
VerDate jul<14>2003
22:14 May 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
To handle complaints about identity
theft, the FTC must obtain more detailed
information than is required of other
complainants. The FTC designed its
online identity theft form to be as short
as practicable, seeking only the
minimum information needed for initial
evaluation and potential follow up.
When consumers call the Consumer
Response Center, however, the
telephone counselors seek to obtain
more detailed and comprehensive
information to minimize the need for
follow up calls. Staff estimates it takes
8 minutes per call to obtain this
information because investigating
identity theft requires more information
(such as credit history, credit bureau
information, respondent social security
number, identifying multiple suspects)
than general consumer complaints and
complaints about fraud. A substantial
portion of identity theft-related calls
typically consists of counseling
consumers on other steps they should
consider taking to obtain relief. The
time needed for counseling is excluded
from the estimate.
Consumer customer satisfaction
surveys give the agency information
about the overall effectiveness and
timeliness of the Consumer Response
Center (CRC). The CRC surveys roughly
1 percent of complainants. Subsets of
consumers contacted throughout the
year are questioned about specific
aspects of CRC customer service. Each
consumer surveyed is asked several
questions chosen from a list prepared by
staff. The questions are designed to
elicit information from consumers about
the overall effectiveness of the call
center. Half of the questions ask
consumers to rate CRC performance on
a scale or require a yes or no response.
The second half of the survey asks more
open-ended questions seeking a short
written or verbal answer. Staff estimates
that each respondent will require 4
minutes to answer the questions
(approximately 20–30 seconds per
question).
Finally, Consumer Sentinel user
surveys give the agency information
about the overall effectiveness of its
Consumer Sentinel Network. Consumer
Sentinel allows federal, state and local
law enforcement organizations common
access to a secure database containing
over two million complaints from
victims of consumer fraud and identity
theft. To date, Consumer Sentinel has
over 1200 members, including law
enforcement agencies from Canada and
Australia. FTC staff plan to survey
roughly 50% (approximately 2,500
respondents) of Consumer Sentinel
users each year about such things as
overall satisfaction, performance, and
possible improvements. Generally, the
surveys should take approximately 10
minutes per respondent (417 hours
total).
What follows are staff’s estimates of
burden for these various collections of
information, including the surveys. The
figures for the online forms and
consumer hotlines are an average of
annualized volume for the respective
programs including both current and
projected volumes over the 3-year
clearance period sought and are
rounded to the nearest thousand.
4 This includes Commission Rule of Practice
4.11(e), 16 CFR 4.11(e), which establishes
procedures for agency review of outside requests for
Commission employee testimony, through
compulsory process or otherwise, in cases or
matters to which the agency is not a party. The rule
requires that a person who seeks such testimony
submit a statement in support of the request. Staff
estimates that agency personnel receive roughly 2
such requests per month or 24 per year, and
conservatively estimates that it would require up to
2 hours to prepare the statement, for a cumulative
total of 24 hours.
5 Because the fraud-related form is closely
patterned after the general complaint form, burden
estimates per respondent for each are the same.
6 In general, Do-Not-Call complaints consist of
consumer contact information, telemarketing
company name or telephone number and the date
and time of the telemarketing call being complained
about.
gather information, somewhat less time
than the 5 minutes estimated for
consumers to enter a complaint online.5
The burden estimate conservatively
assumes that all of the phone call is
devoted to collecting information from
consumers, although frequently
telephone counselors devote a small
portion of the call to providing
requested information to consumers.
Complaints Concerning National DoNot-Call Registry
To handle complaints from
consumers relating to possible
violations of the National Do-Not-Call
Registry, the FTC maintains both an
online form and a toll free hotline. Both
collect significantly less data than what
is usually collected in a general
consumer complaint.6 The hotline uses
an automated voice response system to
collect information from consumer
complainants. The FTC staff estimates
that phone complaints require 2.5
minutes and online complaints require
2 minutes.
Identity Theft
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
28943
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Notices
Number of
respondents
Activity
Number of
minutes/
activity
Total hours
Miscell. and fraud-related consumer complaints (phone)* ..........................................................
Miscell. and fraud-related consumer complaints (online)** .........................................................
IDT complaints (phone)* ..............................................................................................................
IDT complaints (online)** .............................................................................................................
Do-Not-Call related consumer complaints (phone) .....................................................................
Do-Not-Call related consumer complaints (online) .....................................................................
Customer Satisfaction Questionnaire ..........................................................................................
Consumer Sentinel User Surveys ...............................................................................................
315,000
135,000
380,000
80,000
82,000
430,000
9,000
2,500
4.5
5.0
8
7.5
2.5
2
4.0
10
23,625
11,250
50,667
10,000
3,417
14,333
600
417
Totals ....................................................................................................................................
1,433,500
........................
114,309
* Number of consumer calls calculated by projecting over the 3-year clearance period sought 5% annual growth and a telephone contractor response rate of 95% (contracted level of service) with regard to consumers who call the toll free lines and opt to talk to a counselor.
** Number of online collections projected from number of consumers who use the FTC’s online complaint forms noted in the text above. These
figures also assume 5% annual growth over the 3-year clearance period requested.
Annual cost burden:
The cost per respondent should be
negligible. Participation is voluntary
and will not require any labor
expenditures by respondents. There are
no capital, start-up, operation,
maintenance, or other similar costs to
the respondents.
(c) Review of Divestiture Orders: 320
Hours
The Commission issues, on average,
approximately 10–15 orders in merger
cases per year that require divestitures.
As a result of a 1999 study authorized
by the OMB and conducted by the staffs
of the Bureau of Competition and the
Bureau of Economics,7 the Bureau of
Competition (‘‘BC’’) intends to enhance
its monitoring of these required
divestitures by interviewing
representatives of the Commissionapproved buyers of the divested assets
within the first year after the divestiture
is completed. For the first several years
of this new evaluation process,
however, BC staff will be focusing on
older orders and thus anticipates
reviewing up to 40 divestitures per year.
BC staff will interview representatives
of the buyers to ask whether all assets
required to be divested were, in fact,
divested; 8 whether the buyer has used
the divested assets to enter the market
of concern to the Commission and, if so,
the extent to which the buyer is
participating in the market; whether the
divestiture met the buyer’s expectations;
and whether the buyer believes the
divestiture has been successful. BC staff
may also interview other participants,
7 The Staff of the Bureau of Competition of the
Federal Trade Commission compiled its findings
from the study in its report: A Study of the
Commission’s Divestiture Process, 1999, available
at https://www.ftc.gov/os/1999/08/divestiture.pdf.
8 To the extent that the staff interviews focus on
a law enforcement activity (whether the party to the
order complied with all its obligations), the
interviews are not subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act. See supra note 3.
VerDate jul<14>2003
22:14 May 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
including customers or trustee monitors,
as appropriate. In all these interviews,
staff will seek to learn about pricing and
other basic facts regarding competition
in the markets of concern to the agency.
Participation by the buyers will be
voluntary. Each responding company
will designate the company
representative most likely to have the
necessary information; in all likelihood,
it will be a company executive and a
lawyer for the company may also be
present. BC staff estimates that each
interview will take approximately one
hour to complete, with no more than an
hour’s preparation required by each of
the participants. In some instances, staff
may do additional interviews with
customers of the responding company
or the monitor. Staff conservatively
estimates that for each interview, two
individuals (a company executive and a
lawyer) will devote two hours each to
responding to our questions for a total
of four hours. In addition, for
approximately half of the divestitures,
staff will seek to question two
additional respondents, adding four
participants (a company executive and a
lawyer for each of the two additional
respondents) devoting two hours each,
for a total of eight additional hours.
Assuming that staff evaluates up to 40
divestitures per year during the threeyear clearance period, the total hours
burden for the responding companies
will be approximately 320 hours per
year ((40 × 4 hours) + (20 × 8 hours)).
Using the burden hours estimated
above, staff estimates that the total
annual labor cost, based on a
conservative estimated average of $425/
hour for executives’ and attorneys’
wages, would be approximately
$136,000 (320 hours × $425).
(d) Applicant Tracking Form: 400 Hours
The FTC’s Human Resources
Management Office intends to survey
job applicants on their ethnicity, race,
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and disability status in order to
determine if recruitment is effectively
reaching all aspects of the relevant labor
pool, in compliance with management
directives from the Equal Opportunity
Employment Commission. Response by
applicants is optional. The information
obtained will be used for evaluating
recruitment only and plays no part in
the selection of who is hired. The
information is not provided to selecting
officials. Instead, the information is
used in summary form to determine
trends over many selections within a
given occupational or organizational
area. The information is treated in a
confidential manner. No information
from the form is entered into the official
personnel file of the individual selected
and all forms are destroyed after the
conclusion of the selection process. The
format of the questions on ethnicity and
race are compliant with OMB
requirements and comparable to those
used by other agencies.
The FTC staff estimates that up to
5,000 applicants will submit the form as
part of the new online application
process and that the form will require 5
minutes to complete, for an annual
burden total of approximately 400
hours.
Annual cost burden:
The cost per respondent should be
negligible. Participation is voluntary
and will not require any labor
expenditures by respondents. There are
no capital, start-up, operation,
maintenance, or other similar costs to
the respondents.
William Blumenthal,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05–10026 Filed 5–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 96 (Thursday, May 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28937-28943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-10026]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Extension
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'' or ``FTC'').
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 28938]]
SUMMARY: The information collection requirements described below will
be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') for
review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C.
3501-3520). The FTC is seeking public comments on its proposal to
extend through August 31, 2008, the current Paperwork Reduction Act
clearances for information collection requirements contained in four
Commission rules and one clearance covering the Commission's
administrative activities. Those clearances expire on August 31, 2005.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 18, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments.
Comments should refer to ``Paperwork Comment: FTC File No. P822108'' to
facilitate the organization of comments. A comment filed in paper form
should include this reference both in the text and on the envelope and
should be mailed or delivered to the following address: Federal Trade
Commission/Office of the Secretary, Room H-159 (Annex J), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580. The FTC is requesting
that any comment filed in paper form be sent by courier or overnight
service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area
and at the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security
precautions. Alternatively, comments may be filed in electronic form
(in ASCII format, WordPerfect, or Microsoft Word) as part of or as an
attachment to e-mail messages directed to the following e-mail box:
PaperworkComment@ftc.gov. If the comment contains any material for
which confidential treatment is requested, it must be filed in paper
form, and the first page of the document must be clearly labeled
``Confidential.''\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Commission Rule 4.2(d), 16 CFR 4.2(d). The comment must be
accompanied by an explicit request for confidential treatment,
including the factual and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from
the public record. The request will be granted or denied by the
Commission's General Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the
public interest. See Commission Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FTC Act and other laws the Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. All timely and responsive public comments will be
considered by the Commission and will be available to the public on the
FTC Web site, to the extent practicable, at https://www.ftc.gov. As a
matter of discretion, the FTC makes every effort to remove home contact
information for individuals from the public comments it receives before
placing those comments on the FTC Web site. More information, including
routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC's
privacy policy at https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the proposed information requirements should be addressed as
follows:
For the Negative Option Rule, contact Edwin Rodriguez, Attorney,
Division of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20580, (202)
326-3147.
For the Amplifier Rule, contact Neil Blickman, Attorney, Division
of Enforcement, Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Consumer
Protection, 600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20580, (202)
326-3038.
For the Franchise Rule, contact Steven Toporoff, Attorney, Division
of Marketing Practices, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20580, (202)
326-3135.
For the R-Value Rule, contact Hampton Newsome, Attorney, Division
of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20580, (202)
326-2889.
For the Administrative Activities clearance, contact J. Ronald
Brooke Jr., Attorney, Division of Planning and Information, Bureau of
Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Ave.,
NW., Rm. H-155, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3484.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA, federal agencies must obtain
approval from OMB for each collection of information they conduct or
sponsor. ``Collection of information'' means agency requests or
requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records,
or provide information to a third party. 44 U.S.C. 3502(3), 5 CFR
1320.3(c). As required by section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the FTC is
providing this opportunity for public comment before requesting that
OMB extend the existing paperwork clearance for the Negative Option
Rule, 16 CFR Part 425 (OMB Control Number 3084-0104); the Amplifier
Rule, 16 CFR Part 432 (OMB Control Number 3084-0105); the Franchise
Rule, 16 CFR Part 436 (OMB Control Number 3084-0107); the R-Value Rule,
16 CFR Part 460 (OMB Control Number 3084-0109); and the Administrative
Activities Clearance (OMB Control Number 3084-0047).
The FTC invites comments on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
1. The Negative Option Rule, 16 CFR Part 425 (OMB Control Number: 3084-
0104)
The Negative Option Rule governs the operation of prenotification
subscription plans. Under these plans, sellers ship merchandise, such
as books, compact discs, or tapes, automatically to their subscribers
and bill them for the merchandise if consumers do not expressly reject
the merchandise within a prescribed time. The Rule protects consumers
by: (a) requiring that promotional materials disclose the terms of
membership clearly and conspicuously; and (b) establishing procedures
for the administration of such ``negative option'' plans.
Estimated annual hours burden: 15,000 hours.
Staff estimates that approximately 190 existing clubs require
annually about 75 hours each to comply with the Rule's disclosure
requirements, for a total of 14,250 hours (190 clubs x 75 hours). These
clubs should be familiar with the Rule, which has been in effect since
1974, with the result that the burden of compliance has declined over
time. Moreover, a substantial portion of the existing clubs likely
would make these disclosures absent the Rule because they have helped
foster long-term relationships with consumers.
Approximately 5 new clubs come into being each year. These clubs
require approximately 120 hours to comply with the Rule, including
start up-time. Thus, cumulative PRA burden for new clubs is about 600
hours. Combined with the estimated burden for established clubs, total
burden is 14,850 hours or 15,000, rounded to the nearest thousand.
[[Page 28939]]
Estimated annual cost burden: $490,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand (solely related to labor costs).
Based on recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the
average compensation for advertising managers is approximately $36 per
hour. Compensation for clerical personnel is approximately $13 per
hour. Assuming that managers perform the bulk of the work, while
clerical personnel perform associated tasks (e.g., placing
advertisements and responding to inquiries about offerings or prices),
the total cost to the industry for the Rule's paperwork requirements
would be approximately $489,750 [(65 hours managerial time x 190
existing negative option plans x $36 per hour) + (10 hours clerical
time x 190 existing negative option plans x $13 per hour) + (110 hours
managerial time x 5 new negative option plans x $36 per hour) + (10
hours clerical time x 5 new negative option plans x $13)].
Because the Rule has been in effect since 1974, the vast majority
of the negative option clubs have no current start-up costs. For the
few new clubs that enter the market each year, the costs associated
with the Rule's disclosure requirements, beyond the additional labor
costs discussed above, are de minimis. Negative option clubs already
have access to the ordinary office equipment necessary to achieve
compliance with the Rule. Similarly, the Rule imposes few, if any,
printing and distribution costs. The required disclosures generally
constitute only a small addition to the materials that a prospective
subscriber sends to the seller to solicit enrollment in a negative
option plan. Because printing and distribution expenditures are
incurred regardless of the Rule to market the product, adding the
required disclosures to them would result in marginal incremental
expense.
2. The Amplifier Rule, 16 CFR Part 432 (OMB Control Number: 3084-0105)
The Amplifier Rule assists consumers by standardizing the
measurement and disclosure of power output and other performance
characteristics of amplifiers in stereos and other home entertainment
equipment. The Rule also specifies the test conditions necessary to
make the disclosures that the Rule requires.
Estimated annual hours burden: 450 hours (300 testing-related
hours; 150 disclosure-related hours).
The Rule's provisions require affected entities to test the power
output of amplifiers in accordance with a specified FTC protocol. The
staff estimates that approximately 300 new amplifiers and receivers
come on the market each year. High fidelity manufacturers routinely
conduct performance tests as part of any new product development. As a
result, the Rule imposes incremental costs only to the extent that the
FTC protocol is more time-consuming than alternative testing
procedures. Specifically, a warm up (``precondition'') period that the
Rule requires before measurements are taken may add approximately one
hour to the time testing entails. Thus, staff estimates that the Rule
imposes approximately 300 hours (1 hour x 300 new products) of added
testing burden annually.
The Rule requires disclosures if a media advertisement makes a
power output claim or if a manufacturer specification sheet and product
brochure for a covered product make a power output claim. This
requirement does not impose any additional costs on manufacturers
because, absent the Rule, media advertisements, as well as manufacturer
specification sheets and product brochures, simply would contain a
power specification obtained using an alternative to the Rule-required
testing protocol. The Rule, though, also requires disclosure of
harmonic distortion, power bandwidth, and impedance ratings in
manufacturer specification sheets and product brochures. The staff's
research suggests that approximately 300 new amplifiers and receivers
are introduced each year. The cost of disclosing the ancillary
distortion, bandwidth, and impedance information in the potentially 600
new specification sheets and brochures produced each year for those
products (300 x 2) is limited to the time needed to draft and review
the language pertaining to the aforementioned specifications. Because
this Rule became effective in 1974 and because members of the industry
are familiar with its requirements, compliance is less burdensome
today. Accordingly, staff continues to estimate the time involved for
this task to be a maximum of \1/4\ hour for each new specification
sheet and brochure (600 x .25 hours), for a total annual burden of 150
hours. The total annual burden imposed by the Rule, therefore, is
approximately 450 burden hours for testing and disclosures.
Estimated annual cost burden: $16,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand (solely relating to labor costs).
Based on recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the
average hourly compensation for electronics engineers is about $36, and
the average hourly compensation for advertising and promotions managers
is about $36. Generally, electronics engineers perform the testing of
amplifiers and receivers (300 hours x $36 = $10,800), and advertising
or promotions managers prepare product brochures and manufacturer
specification sheets (including required disclosures) (150 hours x $36
= $5,400). Based on this information, staff estimates industry labor
costs associated with the Rule of approximately $16,000 per year,
rounded to the nearest thousand.
The Rule imposes no capital or other non-labor costs because its
requirements are incidental to testing and advertising done in the
ordinary course of business.
3. The Franchise Rule, 16 CFR Part 436 (OMB Control Number: 3084-0107)
The Franchise Rule requires franchisors and franchise brokers to
furnish to prospective investors a disclosure document that provides
information relating to the franchisor, the franchisor's business, the
nature of the proposed franchise relationship, as well as additional
information about any claims concerning actual or potential sales,
income, or profits for a prospective franchisee (``financial
performance claims''). The franchisor must also preserve the
information that forms a reasonable basis for such claims. The FTC is
seeking to extend the PRA clearance for the existing Rule. In addition,
the FTC is seeking PRA clearance for the rule changes that have been
proposed in the ongoing rulemaking proceeding.
Estimated annual hours burden for existing Franchise Rule: 33,500
hours.
The Rule's required disclosure document provides franchisees with
information on broad-ranging subjects that affect franchisors and the
nature of the proposed franchise relationship. This includes not only
generally available information, such as the official name and address
and principal place of business of the franchisor, but also less
commonly available information, such as, among other things, the
previous five years business experience of a franchisor's current
directors and executive officers and whether any of these individuals
have been convicted of a felony or fraud or have filed for bankruptcy
or been adjudged bankrupt during the previous seven years. All
information in the disclosure statement must be updated and revised
according to the express time requirements set forth in the Rule.
Based on a review of the trade publications and information from
state regulatory authorities, staff believes that, on average, from
year to year, there are approximately 5,000 American franchise systems,
consisting of 2,500 business format franchises and 2,500
[[Page 28940]]
business opportunity sellers, with approximately 500 (or 10%) of the
total reflecting new entrants who have replaced departing businesses.
Staff has calculated burden based on the above estimates. Some
franchisors, however, for various reasons, are not covered by the Rule
in certain situations (e.g., when a franchisee buys bona fide inventory
but pays no franchisor fees). Moreover, fifteen states have franchise
disclosure laws similar to the Rule. These states use a disclosure
document format known as the Uniform Franchise Offering Circular
(``UFOC''). In order to ease compliance burdens on the franchisor, the
Commission has authorized use of the UFOC in lieu of its own disclosure
format to satisfy the Rule's disclosure requirements. Staff estimates
that about 95 percent of all franchisors use the UFOC format. When that
format is used, the franchisor is not required to prepare an additional
federal disclosure document. The burden hours stated below reflects
staff's estimate of the incremental burden that the Franchise Rule may
impose beyond information requirements imposed by states and/or
followed by franchisors who use the UFOC.
Staff estimates that the 500 or so new franchisors (including
business opportunity ventures) require approximately 30 hours each to
develop a Rule-compliant disclosure document. Staff additionally
estimates that the remaining 4,500 established franchisors require no
more than approximately 3 hours each to update the disclosure document.
The combined cumulative burden is 28,500 hours.
The franchisor may require additional recordkeeping of information
pertaining to the sale of franchises in non-registration states. At
most, franchisors would require an additional hour of recordkeeping per
year. This yields a cumulative total of 5,000 hours per year for
affected entities.
Estimated annual cost burden for existing rule: $7,190,000.
Labor costs are determined by applying applicable wage rates to
associated burden hours. Staff assumes that an attorney likely would
prepare or update the disclosure document. Accordingly, staff's
estimate of the labor costs attributed to those tasks are as follows:
(500 new franchisors x $250 per hour x 30 hours per franchisor) +
(4,500 established franchisors x $250 per hour x 3 hours per
franchisor) = $7,125,000.
Staff anticipates that recordkeeping would be performed by clerical
staff at approximately $13 per hour. At 5,000 hours per year for all
affected entities, this would amount to a total cost of $65,000. Thus,
combined labor costs for recordkeeping and disclosure is approximately
$7,190,000.
Estimated increase in annual hours burden for proposed rule
amendments: 2750 hours.
The Commission has begun a rulemaking proceeding to amend the
Franchise Rule. 64 FR 57294 (1999) (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking). The
Staff Report on the Proposed Revised Franchise Rule (Aug. 25, 2004)
(``Staff Report''), which is available online at https://www.ftc.gov,
sets forth the staff's recommendations to the Commission on various
proposed amendments to the Franchise Rule. The Commission did not
review or approve the staff report prior to its issuance. See 69 FR
53661 (2004) (Notice Announcing Publication of Staff Report). Among
other things, the Rule amendments discussed in the Staff Report would
accomplish five goals. First, the staff has recommended that the
amended Rule address the sale of business format and product franchises
exclusively. The existing requirements for business opportunity
ventures would be renumbered as a separate rule limited to business
opportunities only. See Staff Report at 13 and n.42. Accordingly, the
burden for business opportunity ventures will remain the same.
Second, the amended Rule would reduce inconsistencies between
federal and state disclosure requirements. Fifteen states have
franchise disclosure laws similar to the Rule. These states use a
disclosure document format known as the Uniform Franchise Offering
Circular (``UFOC''). Staff estimates that about 95 percent of all
franchisors use the UFOC format. The amended Rule would incorporate
nearly all of the UFOC disclosures, thereby harmonizing federal and
state disclosure laws.
Third, the amended Rule would require the disclosure of more
information on the quality of the franchise relationship. Among other
things, franchisors would disclose litigation initiated against
franchisees involving the franchise relationship and franchisee-
specific trademark associations.
Fourth, the amended Rule would update the rule to address new
technologies. Specifically, it would permit franchisors to furnish
disclosures electronically. This includes transmission via CD ROM, e-
mail, and access to a Web site.
Finally, the amended Rule would reduce compliance costs by
expanding exemptions from disclosure. Specifically, the amended Rule
would create new exemptions for sophisticated investors and for sales
to managers and others within the franchise system who are already
familiar with the franchise system's operations.
At the same time, the amended Rule would increase franchisor's
recordkeeping obligations. Specifically, a franchisor would be required
to retain copies of receipts for disclosure documents, as well as
materially different versions of its disclosure documents. Such
recordkeeping requirements, however, are consistent with, or less
burdensome, than those imposed by the states.
Staff estimates the increase in burden attributable to the proposed
Rule amendments as follows: Each year, approximately 250 new
franchisors will require 32 hours each (2 hours more than under the
existing Rule) to develop a Rule-compliant disclosure document
(increase of 500 hours). Staff also estimates that during the first
year that the amended Rule is effective, the remaining 2250 established
franchisors will require approximately 6 hours each (3 hours more than
under the existing Rule) to update their existing disclosure document
to comply with the amended Rule (increase of 6750 hours for the first
year). After the first year, however, the time required should be the
same as under the existing Rule, as the new disclosure format becomes
familiar. Accordingly, the increase in the annual disclosure burden,
averaged over the three-year clearance period, will be 2750 hours (500
hours per year for new franchisors + 2250 hours per year for
established franchisors).
Estimated increase in annual cost burden for proposed rule
amendments: $688,000, rounded to the nearest thousand.
Labor costs are determined by applying applicable wage rates to
associated burden hours. Staff assumes that an attorney likely would
prepare the disclosure document. Accordingly, staff's estimate of the
increase in labor costs that would be attributable to the proposed Rule
amendments, averaged over the three-year clearance period, is as
follows: (500 hours per year for new franchisors x $250 per hour) +
(2250 hours per year for established franchisors x $250) = $687,500.
4. R-value Rule, 16 CFR Part 460 (OMB Control Number: 3084-0109)
The R-value Rule establishes uniform standards for the
substantiation and disclosure of accurate, material product information
about the thermal performance characteristics of home insulation
products. The R-value of an insulation signifies the insulation's
degree of resistance to the flow of heat. This information tells
consumers how
[[Page 28941]]
well a product is likely to perform as an insulator and allows
consumers to determine whether the cost of the insulation is justified.
Estimated annual hours burden: 121,000 hours.
The Rule's requirements include product testing, recordkeeping, and
third-party disclosures on labels, fact sheets, advertisements, and
other promotional materials. Based on information provided by members
of the insulation industry, staff estimates that the Rule affects: (1)
150 insulation manufacturers and their testing laboratories; (2) 1,615
installers who sell home insulation; (3) 125,000 new home builders/
sellers of site-built homes and approximately 5,500 dealers who sell
manufactured housing; and (4) 25,000 retail sellers who sell home
insulation for installation by consumers.
Under the Rule's testing requirements, manufacturers must test each
insulation product for its R-value. The test takes approximately 2
hours. Approximately 15 of the 150 insulation manufacturers in
existence introduce one new product each year. The total annual testing
burden is therefore approximately 30 hours (15 manufacturers x 2 hours
per test).
Staff further estimates that most manufacturers require an average
of approximately 20 hours per year with regard to third-party
disclosure requirements in advertising and other promotional materials.
Only the five or six largest manufacturers require additional time,
approximately 80 hours each. Thus, the annual third-party disclosure
burden for manufacturers is approximately 3,360 hours [(144
manufacturers x 20 hours) + (6 manufacturers x 80 hours)].
While the Rule imposes recordkeeping requirements, most
manufacturers and their testing laboratories keep their testing-related
records in the ordinary course of business. Staff estimates that no
more than one additional hour per year per manufacturer is necessary to
comply with this requirement, for an annual recordkeeping burden of
approximately 150 hours (150 manufacturers x 1 hour).
Installers are required to show the manufacturers' insulation fact
sheet to retail consumers before purchase. They must also disclose
information in contracts or receipts concerning the R-value and the
amount of insulation to install. Staff estimates that two minutes per
sales transaction is sufficient to comply with these requirements.
Approximately 1,520,000 retrofit insulations are installed by
approximately 1,615 installers per year, and, thus, the related annual
burden total is approximately 50,667 hours (1,520,000 sales
transactions x 2 minutes). Staff anticipates that one hour per year per
installer is sufficient to cover required disclosures in advertisements
and other promotional materials. Thus, the burden for this requirement
is approximately 1,615 hours per year (1,615 installers x 1 hour). In
addition, installers must keep records that indicate the substantiation
relied upon for savings claims. The additional time to comply with this
requirement is minimal--approximately 5 minutes per year per
installer--for a total of approximately 135 hours (1,615 installers x 5
minutes).
New home sellers must make contract disclosures concerning the
type, thickness, and R-value of the insulation they install in each
part of a new home. Staff estimates that no more than 30 seconds per
sales transaction is required to comply with this requirement, for a
total annual burden of approximately 14,167 hours (1.7 million new home
sales x 30 seconds). New home sellers who make energy savings claims
must also keep records regarding the substantiation relied upon for
those claims. Because few new home sellers make these claims, and the
ones that do would likely keep these records regardless of the R-value
Rule, staff believes that the 30 seconds covering disclosures would
also encompass this recordkeeping element.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ In previous requests for clearance under the PRA, the FTC
staff assumed that the requirements related to new home sales
contracts require one minute per sales transaction. See, e.g., 67 FR
21243, 21246 (April 30, 2002). The FTC staff now estimates that the
inclusion of such information should take no more than 30 seconds
per sales transaction because of increased automation, the wide-
spread use of standard contracts, and the prevalence of large firms
in the housing market. In addition, there was a calculation error in
the previous requests that significantly overestimated the total
burden imposed by new home sale contract disclosures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rule requires that the approximately 25,000 retailers who sell
home insulation make fact sheets available to consumers before
purchase. This can be accomplished by, for example, placing copies in a
display rack or keeping copies in a binder on a service desk with an
appropriate notice. Replenishing or replacing fact sheets should
require no more than approximately one hour per year per retailer, for
a total of 25,000 annual hours, industry-wide.
The Rule also requires specific disclosures in advertisements or
other promotional materials to ensure that the claims are fair and not
deceptive. This burden is very minimal because retailers typically use
advertising copy provided by the insulation manufacturer, and even when
retailers prepare their own advertising copy, the Rule provides some of
the language to be used. Accordingly, approximately one hour per year
per retailer should suffice to meet this requirement, for a total
annual burden of approximately 25,000 hours.
Retailers who make energy savings claims in advertisements or other
promotional materials must keep records that indicate the
substantiation they are relying upon. Because few retailers make these
types of promotional claims and because the Rule permits retailers to
rely on the insulation manufacturer's substantiation data for any
claims that are made, the additional recordkeeping burden is de
minimis. The time calculated for disclosures, above, would be more than
adequate to cover any burden imposed by this recordkeeping requirement.
To summarize, staff estimates that the Rule imposes a total of
120,624 burden hours, as follows: 150 recordkeeping and 3,390 testing
and disclosure hours for manufacturers; 135 recordkeeping and 52,282
disclosure hours for installers; 14,667 disclosure hours for new home
sellers; and 50,000 disclosure hours for retailers. Rounded to the
nearest thousand, the total burden is 121,000 burden hours.
Estimated annual cost burden: $2,738,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand (solely related to labor costs).
The total annual labor costs for the Rule's information collection
requirements is $2,737,902, derived as follows: $690 for testing, based
on 30 hours for manufacturers (30 hours x $23 per hour for skilled
technical personnel); $3,705 for complying with the recordkeeping
requirements of the Rule, based on 285 hours (285 hours x $13 per hour
for clerical personnel); $43,680 for manufacturers' compliance with
third-party disclosure requirements, based on 3,360 hours (3,360 hours
x $13 per hour for clerical personnel); and $2,689,827 for compliance
by installers, new home sellers, and retailers (116,949 hours x $23 per
hour for sales persons).
There are no significant current capital or other non-labor costs
associated with this Rule. Because the Rule has been in effect since
1980, members of the industry are familiar with its requirements and
already have in place the equipment for conducting tests and storing
records. New products are introduced infrequently. Because the required
disclosures are placed on packaging or on the product itself, the
Rule's additional disclosure requirements do not cause industry members
to incur any significant additional non-labor associated costs.
[[Page 28942]]
5. FTC Administrative Activities (OMB Control Number: 3084-0047)
This category consists of: (a) Applications to the Commission,
including applications and notices contained in the Commission's Rules
of Practice (primarily Parts I, II, and IV); (b) the FTC's Consumer
Response Center; (c) FTC staff review of Commission divestiture orders
in merger cases; and (d) Applicant Background Form.
Estimated annual hours burden: 115,000 hours, rounded to the
nearest thousand.
(a) Applications to the Commission, Including Applications and Notices
Contained in the Commission's Rules of Practice: 125 Hours
Most applications to the Commission generally fall within the ``law
enforcement'' exception to the Paperwork Reduction Act.\3\ Over the
last decade, the Commission has received only one application for an
exemption under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act provisions.
Staff has estimated that such a submission can be completed well within
50 hours. Applications and notices to the Commission contained in other
rules (generally in Parts I, II, and IV of the Commission's Rule of
Practice) are also infrequent and difficult to quantify. Nonetheless,
in order to cover any potential ``collections of information'' for
which separate clearance has not been sought, staff is projecting 125
hours as its estimate of the time needed to submit any applicable
responses.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The ``law enforcement'' exception to the PRA excludes most
items in this subcategory because they involve collecting
information during the conduct of a Federal investigation, civil
action, administrative action, investigation, or audit with respect
to a specific party, or subsequent adjudicative or judicial
proceedings designed to determine fines or other penalties. See 44
U.S.C. 3518(c)(1); 5 CFR 1320.4(a)(1)-(3).
\4\ This includes Commission Rule of Practice 4.11(e), 16 CFR
4.11(e), which establishes procedures for agency review of outside
requests for Commission employee testimony, through compulsory
process or otherwise, in cases or matters to which the agency is not
a party. The rule requires that a person who seeks such testimony
submit a statement in support of the request. Staff estimates that
agency personnel receive roughly 2 such requests per month or 24 per
year, and conservatively estimates that it would require up to 2
hours to prepare the statement, for a cumulative total of 24 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Complaint Systems: 114,300 Hours
Consumer Response Center
Consumers can submit complaints about fraud and other practices to
the FTC's Consumer Response Center by telephone or through the FTC's
Web site. Telephone complaints and inquiries to the FTC are answered
both by FTC staff and contractors. These telephone counselors ask for
the same information that consumers would enter on the applicable forms
available on the FTC's Web site. For telephone inquiries and
complaints, the FTC staff estimates that it takes 4.5 minutes per call
to gather information, somewhat less time than the 5 minutes estimated
for consumers to enter a complaint online.\5\ The burden estimate
conservatively assumes that all of the phone call is devoted to
collecting information from consumers, although frequently telephone
counselors devote a small portion of the call to providing requested
information to consumers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Because the fraud-related form is closely patterned after
the general complaint form, burden estimates per respondent for each
are the same.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Complaints Concerning National Do-Not-Call Registry
To handle complaints from consumers relating to possible violations
of the National Do-Not-Call Registry, the FTC maintains both an online
form and a toll free hotline. Both collect significantly less data than
what is usually collected in a general consumer complaint.\6\ The
hotline uses an automated voice response system to collect information
from consumer complainants. The FTC staff estimates that phone
complaints require 2.5 minutes and online complaints require 2 minutes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ In general, Do-Not-Call complaints consist of consumer
contact information, telemarketing company name or telephone number
and the date and time of the telemarketing call being complained
about.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identity Theft
To handle complaints about identity theft, the FTC must obtain more
detailed information than is required of other complainants. The FTC
designed its online identity theft form to be as short as practicable,
seeking only the minimum information needed for initial evaluation and
potential follow up. When consumers call the Consumer Response Center,
however, the telephone counselors seek to obtain more detailed and
comprehensive information to minimize the need for follow up calls.
Staff estimates it takes 8 minutes per call to obtain this information
because investigating identity theft requires more information (such as
credit history, credit bureau information, respondent social security
number, identifying multiple suspects) than general consumer complaints
and complaints about fraud. A substantial portion of identity theft-
related calls typically consists of counseling consumers on other steps
they should consider taking to obtain relief. The time needed for
counseling is excluded from the estimate.
Consumer customer satisfaction surveys give the agency information
about the overall effectiveness and timeliness of the Consumer Response
Center (CRC). The CRC surveys roughly 1 percent of complainants.
Subsets of consumers contacted throughout the year are questioned about
specific aspects of CRC customer service. Each consumer surveyed is
asked several questions chosen from a list prepared by staff. The
questions are designed to elicit information from consumers about the
overall effectiveness of the call center. Half of the questions ask
consumers to rate CRC performance on a scale or require a yes or no
response. The second half of the survey asks more open-ended questions
seeking a short written or verbal answer. Staff estimates that each
respondent will require 4 minutes to answer the questions
(approximately 20-30 seconds per question).
Finally, Consumer Sentinel user surveys give the agency information
about the overall effectiveness of its Consumer Sentinel Network.
Consumer Sentinel allows federal, state and local law enforcement
organizations common access to a secure database containing over two
million complaints from victims of consumer fraud and identity theft.
To date, Consumer Sentinel has over 1200 members, including law
enforcement agencies from Canada and Australia. FTC staff plan to
survey roughly 50% (approximately 2,500 respondents) of Consumer
Sentinel users each year about such things as overall satisfaction,
performance, and possible improvements. Generally, the surveys should
take approximately 10 minutes per respondent (417 hours total).
What follows are staff's estimates of burden for these various
collections of information, including the surveys. The figures for the
online forms and consumer hotlines are an average of annualized volume
for the respective programs including both current and projected
volumes over the 3-year clearance period sought and are rounded to the
nearest thousand.
[[Page 28943]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Activity Number of minutes/ Total hours
respondents activity
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miscell. and fraud-related consumer complaints (phone)*......... 315,000 4.5 23,625
Miscell. and fraud-related consumer complaints (online)**....... 135,000 5.0 11,250
IDT complaints (phone)*......................................... 380,000 8 50,667
IDT complaints (online)**....................................... 80,000 7.5 10,000
Do-Not-Call related consumer complaints (phone)................. 82,000 2.5 3,417
Do-Not-Call related consumer complaints (online)................ 430,000 2 14,333
Customer Satisfaction Questionnaire............................. 9,000 4.0 600
Consumer Sentinel User Surveys.................................. 2,500 10 417
-----------------
Totals...................................................... 1,433,500 .............. 114,309
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Number of consumer calls calculated by projecting over the 3-year clearance period sought 5% annual growth and
a telephone contractor response rate of 95% (contracted level of service) with regard to consumers who call
the toll free lines and opt to talk to a counselor.
** Number of online collections projected from number of consumers who use the FTC's online complaint forms
noted in the text above. These figures also assume 5% annual growth over the 3-year clearance period
requested.
Annual cost burden:
The cost per respondent should be negligible. Participation is
voluntary and will not require any labor expenditures by respondents.
There are no capital, start-up, operation, maintenance, or other
similar costs to the respondents.
(c) Review of Divestiture Orders: 320 Hours
The Commission issues, on average, approximately 10-15 orders in
merger cases per year that require divestitures. As a result of a 1999
study authorized by the OMB and conducted by the staffs of the Bureau
of Competition and the Bureau of Economics,\7\ the Bureau of
Competition (``BC'') intends to enhance its monitoring of these
required divestitures by interviewing representatives of the
Commission-approved buyers of the divested assets within the first year
after the divestiture is completed. For the first several years of this
new evaluation process, however, BC staff will be focusing on older
orders and thus anticipates reviewing up to 40 divestitures per year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Staff of the Bureau of Competition of the Federal Trade
Commission compiled its findings from the study in its report: A
Study of the Commission's Divestiture Process, 1999, available at
https://www.ftc.gov/os/1999/08/divestiture.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BC staff will interview representatives of the buyers to ask
whether all assets required to be divested were, in fact, divested; \8\
whether the buyer has used the divested assets to enter the market of
concern to the Commission and, if so, the extent to which the buyer is
participating in the market; whether the divestiture met the buyer's
expectations; and whether the buyer believes the divestiture has been
successful. BC staff may also interview other participants, including
customers or trustee monitors, as appropriate. In all these interviews,
staff will seek to learn about pricing and other basic facts regarding
competition in the markets of concern to the agency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ To the extent that the staff interviews focus on a law
enforcement activity (whether the party to the order complied with
all its obligations), the interviews are not subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act. See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Participation by the buyers will be voluntary. Each responding
company will designate the company representative most likely to have
the necessary information; in all likelihood, it will be a company
executive and a lawyer for the company may also be present. BC staff
estimates that each interview will take approximately one hour to
complete, with no more than an hour's preparation required by each of
the participants. In some instances, staff may do additional interviews
with customers of the responding company or the monitor. Staff
conservatively estimates that for each interview, two individuals (a
company executive and a lawyer) will devote two hours each to
responding to our questions for a total of four hours. In addition, for
approximately half of the divestitures, staff will seek to question two
additional respondents, adding four participants (a company executive
and a lawyer for each of the two additional respondents) devoting two
hours each, for a total of eight additional hours. Assuming that staff
evaluates up to 40 divestitures per year during the three-year
clearance period, the total hours burden for the responding companies
will be approximately 320 hours per year ((40 x 4 hours) + (20 x 8
hours)).
Using the burden hours estimated above, staff estimates that the
total annual labor cost, based on a conservative estimated average of
$425/hour for executives' and attorneys' wages, would be approximately
$136,000 (320 hours x $425).
(d) Applicant Tracking Form: 400 Hours
The FTC's Human Resources Management Office intends to survey job
applicants on their ethnicity, race, and disability status in order to
determine if recruitment is effectively reaching all aspects of the
relevant labor pool, in compliance with management directives from the
Equal Opportunity Employment Commission. Response by applicants is
optional. The information obtained will be used for evaluating
recruitment only and plays no part in the selection of who is hired.
The information is not provided to selecting officials. Instead, the
information is used in summary form to determine trends over many
selections within a given occupational or organizational area. The
information is treated in a confidential manner. No information from
the form is entered into the official personnel file of the individual
selected and all forms are destroyed after the conclusion of the
selection process. The format of the questions on ethnicity and race
are compliant with OMB requirements and comparable to those used by
other agencies.
The FTC staff estimates that up to 5,000 applicants will submit the
form as part of the new online application process and that the form
will require 5 minutes to complete, for an annual burden total of
approximately 400 hours.
Annual cost burden:
The cost per respondent should be negligible. Participation is
voluntary and will not require any labor expenditures by respondents.
There are no capital, start-up, operation, maintenance, or other
similar costs to the respondents.
William Blumenthal,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05-10026 Filed 5-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P [FEDREG][VOL]*[/VOL][NO]*[/NO][DATE]*[/
DATE][NOTICES]