USPS Standards for Facility Accessibility, 28213-28215 [05-9745]
Download as PDF
28213
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 17, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Description of chargers
1. ..........
2. ..........
3. ..........
4. ..........
5. ..........
6. ..........
Rate ($) Montreal to or from Lake Ontario
(5 locks)
Rate ($) Welland Canal—
Lake Ontario to or from
Lake Erie
(8 locks)
Column 1
Item
Column 2
Column 3
Subject to item 3, for complete transit of the Seaway, a composite toll, comprising:
(1) a charge per gross registered ton of the ship,
applicable whether the ship is wholly or partially
laden, or is in ballast, and the gross registered
tonnage being calculated according to prescribed
rules for measurement in the United States or
under the International Convention on Tonnage
Measurement of Ships, 1969, as amended from
time to time.
(2) a charge per metric ton of cargo as certified on
the ship’s manifest or other document, as follows:.
(a) bulk cargo .......................................................
(b) general cargo ..................................................
(c) steel slab .........................................................
(d) containerized cargo ........................................
(e) government aid cargo .....................................
(f) grain .................................................................
(g) coal .................................................................
(3) a charge per passenger per lock .......................
(4) a charge per lock for transit of the Welland
Canal in either direction by cargo ships:
(a) loaded .............................................................
(b) in ballast ..........................................................
Subject to item 3, for partial transit of the Seaway
Minimum charge per ship per lock transited for full
or partial transit of the Seaway.
A rebate applicable to the rates of item 1 to 3 ........
A charge per pleasure craft per lock transited for
full or partial transit of the Seaway, including applicable federal taxes 1.
In lieu of item 1(4), for vessel carrying new cargo
or returning ballast after carrying new cargo, a
charge per gross registered ton of the ship, the
gross registered tonnage being calculated according to item 1 1:
(a) loaded .............................................................
(b) in ballast ..........................................................
0.0928 ......................................................................
0.1507.
0.9624 ......................................................................
2.3187 ......................................................................
2.0985 ......................................................................
0.9624 ......................................................................
N/A ...........................................................................
0.5912 ......................................................................
0.5681 ......................................................................
1.3680 ......................................................................
0.6376.
1.0204.
0.7305.
0.6376.
N/A.
0.6376.
0.6376.
1.3680.
N/A ...........................................................................
N/A ...........................................................................
20 per cent per lock of the applicable charge under
items 1(1) and (2) plus the applicable charge
under items 1(3) and (4).
20.00 ........................................................................
509.22.
376.23.
13 per cent per lock of the
applicable charge under
items 1(1) and (2) plus
the applicable charge
under items 1(3) and
(4).
20.00.
N/A ...........................................................................
20.00 ........................................................................
N/A.
20.00.
N/A ...........................................................................
N/A ...........................................................................
0.1500.
0.1100.
1 The applicable charge at the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation’s locks (Eisenhower, Snell) for pleasure craft is $25 U.S., or
$30 Canadian per lock. The applicable charge under item 3 at the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation’s locks (Eisenhower, Snell)
will be collected in U.S. dollars. The other amounts are in Canadian dollars and are for the Canadian Share of tolls. The collection of the U.S.
portion of tolls for commercial vessels is waived by law (33 U.S.C. 988a(a)).
Issued at Washington, DC on May 11, 2005.
Saint Lawrence Seaway Development
Corporation.
Albert S. Jacquez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05–9799 Filed 5–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–61–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 254
USPS Standards for Facility
Accessibility
AGENCY:
Postal Service
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:54 May 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Architectural
Barriers Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4151 et.
seq. (2000), the United States Postal
Service is revising its standards for
facility accessibility and adding them to
the CFR. These revisions are made in
response to the Americans with
Disabilities Act/Architectural Barriers
Act Guidelines (ADAAG/ABAAG)
recently published by the U.S.
Architectural and Transportation
Barriers Compliance Board (US Access
Board).
DATES: Effective: October 1, 2005, with
applicability dates as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• For owned facilities, these
standards are applicable effective on
October 1, 2005 for all Postal Service
facility designs that have not reached
30% design completion by October 1,
2005 and for all design/build contracts
for which the solicitation is issued after
October 1, 2005.
• For leased facilities, these standards
are applicable effective on October 1,
2005 for new construction, additions,
and alterations and alternate quarters
with designs that have not reached 30%
completion by October 1, 2005.
• For all existing leased facilities,
these standards are applicable effective
on October 1, 2005 for all new leases
E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM
17MYR1
28214
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 17, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
signed on or after October 1, 2005. The
unilateral exercise of a previously
negotiated lease option is not
considered a new lease for purposes of
these standards.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Koetting, Attorney, U.S. Postal
Service, (202) 268–4818.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The US
Access Board recently adopted
Guidelines to implement the Americans
with Disabilities Act and the
Architectural Barriers Act at 69 FR
44084, July 23, 2004, codified at 36 CFR
part 1191. It is the Postal Service’s
intent to adopt the Guidelines
pertaining to the Architectural Barriers
Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4151 et seq.),
which are found in 36 CFR Part 1191,
with the exception of the Advisory
Notes. As a matter of policy, the
Advisory Notes will be included in the
Postal Service’s revised Handbook RE–
4, ‘‘Standards for Facility Accessibility,’’
which is an internal guidance document
published for the benefit of Postal
Service employees.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 254
Buildings and Facilities, Individuals
with Disabilities, Postal Service
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Postal Service amends 39
CFR chapter 1 by adding a new part 254
to read as follows:
PART 254—POSTAL SERVICE
STANDARDS FOR FACILITY
ACCESSIBILITY PURSUANT TO THE
ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS ACT
Sec.
254.1 Adoption of U.S. Access Board
Standards as Postal Service Standards of
Facility Accessibility
254.2 Definition of primary function area
and criteria used to determine whether
an alteration has an effect on an area
containing a primary function that is
disproportionate to the overall
alterations.
Authority: 39 U.S.C 101, 401, 403; 29
U.S.C. 792(b)(3) and 42 U.S.C. 12204.
§ 254.1 Adoption of U.S. Access Board
Standards as Postal Service Standards of
Facility Accessibility.
(a) The United States Postal Service
adopts as its Architectural Barriers Act
(ABA) ‘‘Standards for Facility
Accessibility,’’ the following sections of
36 CFR part 1191:
Appendix A to Part 1191, Table of
Contents for apps. C, D, and E.
Appendix C to Part 1191,
Architectural Barriers Act, Scoping
(which contains ABA Chapter 1,
Application and Administration, and
ABA Chapter 2, Scoping requirements);
pertinent parts of Appendix D to Part
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:54 May 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
1191, Technical (which includes
Chapters 3 through 10).
Appendix E to Part 1191, List of
Figures and Index.
(b) These sections listed in paragraph
(a) of this section are adopted verbatim,
with the exception of the Advisory
Notes, which are expressly excluded.
§ 254.2 Definition of primary function area
and criteria used to determine whether an
alteration has an effect on an area
containing a primary function that is
disproportionate to the overall alterations.
(a) Terminology. The new
accessibility guidelines require that
certain terms be defined by the
participating federal agencies. In the
U.S. Access Board’s 36 CFR part 1191,
Appendix C, ABA chapter 2, section
F202.6.2 requires that ‘‘primary function
areas’’ be defined and Section F202.4
contains requirements for alterations
affecting ‘‘primary function areas’’
stating, ‘‘* * *an alteration that affects
or could affect the usability of or access
to an area containing a primary function
shall be made so as to ensure that, to the
maximum extent feasible, the path of
travel to the altered area, including the
rest rooms, telephones, and drinking
fountains serving the altered area, are
readily accessible to and usable by
individuals with disabilities, unless
such alterations are disproportionate to
the overall alterations in terms of cost
and scope as determined under criteria
established by the Administrator of
* * * the United States Postal Service.’’
(b) Primary function areas. For
purposes of this part, the primary
function of the Postal Service is to
provide mail service for its customers,
that is to accept, distribute, transport
and deliver the mail. Two essential
facilities for fulfilling these functions
are customer lobby areas where
customers conduct their retail
transactions, access mail depositories
and post office boxes and work room
areas where postal employees distribute
the mail and perform other core postal
operations. Therefore, for purposes of
the accessibility guidelines applicable to
the Postal Service under the
Architectural Barriers Act, two primary
function areas are identified: Customer
Lobbies and Workroom Areas.
(c) Disproportionality. (1) According
to Section F202.6.2, ‘‘alteration’’ of
elements in a primary function area can
trigger a requirement to make
accessibility improvements along the
path of travel to the area and
improvements to rest rooms, telephones,
and drinking fountains that serve the
altered area if the alteration ‘‘affects or
could affect the usability of or access to
an area containing a primary function.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
It is conceivable that almost any repair
or alteration project in a ‘‘primary
function area’’ could affect the usability
of the area. Therefore a literal
interpretation of this provision could
require an expansion of the scope of
virtually any alteration in a primary
function area, regardless of the size and
scope of the original project. According
to Section F202.6.2, accessibility
improvements must be made to the path
of travel to the altered area and to rest
rooms, telephones, and drinking
fountains that serve the altered area
‘‘unless such alterations are
disproportionate to the overall
alterations in terms of cost and scope’’.
(2) For purposes of the accessibility
guidelines applicable to the Postal
Service under the Architectural Barriers
Act, two criteria must be considered in
making a determination whether
accessibility improvements are
disproportionate to the cost and scope
of the original alteration: a magnitude
threshold for the original alteration and
a maximum ‘‘percentage threshold’’ for
the accessibility alteration.
(d) Magnitude threshold. It is
anticipated that, in most cases, a
significant additional effort would be
required to assess physical conditions
along the path of travel and for rest
rooms, telephones, and drinking
fountains that serve the altered area, and
to determine the scope, budget and
appropriate design requirements for any
corrective alterations. Unless the
original alteration is of substantial
magnitude, a disproportionate effort
would be devoted to such investigation,
design, and administration leaving few,
if any funds to accomplish corrective
work. Accordingly, a ‘‘magnitude
threshold’’ is established such that no
accessibility improvements to the path
of travel, nor to any associated facilities,
shall be required under F202.6.2 for
alterations that have an estimated total
cost less than 20 percent of the fair
market value of the facility.
(e) Percentage threshold. For
alterations subject to F202.6.2 that meet
or exceed the ‘‘magnitude threshold,’’
the maximum cost for accessibility
improvements to the path of travel,
including all costs for accessibility
improvements to rest rooms, telephones,
and drinking fountains that serve the
altered area, shall not exceed 20 percent
of the total cost of the original
alteration. Costs for accessibility
improvements in excess of the 20
E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM
17MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 17, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
percent threshold shall be deemed
‘‘disproportionate.’’
Neva Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 05–9745 Filed 5–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R03–OAR–2005–VA–0006; FRL–7913–5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Commonwealth of Virginia; Emission
Standards for Solvent Cleaning
Operations Using Non-Halogenated
Solvents
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the
Commonwealth of Virginia State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The revision
consists of regulatory modifications
intended to clarify the applicability of
the solvent metal cleaning operations
using non-halogenated solvents
provisions. EPA is approving these
revisions in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act.
DATES: This rule is effective on July 18,
2005, without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse written comment
by June 16, 2005. If EPA receives such
comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID Number R03–OAR–
2005–VA–0006 by one of the following
methods:
A. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Agency Web site: https://
www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME,
EPA’s electronic public docket and
comment system, is EPA’s preferred
method for receiving comments. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
C. E-mail: campbell.dave@epa.gov.
D. Mail: R03–OAR–2005–VA–0006,
Dave Campbell, Chief, Air Quality
Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:54 May 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
E. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
RME ID No. R03–OAR–2005–VA–0006.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at https://
www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through RME,
regulations.gov or e-mail. The EPA RME
and the Federal regulations.gov Web
sites are an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means EPA will not
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through RME or regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the RME
index at https://www.docket.epa.gov/
rmepub/. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality, 629 East Main
Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28215
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Wentworth, (215) 814–2034, or by
e-mail at wentworth.ellen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On January 24, 2003 (68 FR 3410),
EPA reclassified the Metropolitan
Washington, DC ozone nonattainment
area (DC area) from ‘‘serious’’ to
‘‘severe’’ for the one-hour ozone
standard. As a severe nonattainment
area, the DC area, which comprises the
states of Maryland, portions of Virginia
and the District of Columbia, is now
required to meet the requirements of
section 182(d) of the CAA and attain the
standard by November 15, 2005. As a
result of the reclassification to severe
nonattainment, the DC area must
implement additional control measures
and submit SIP revisions for post-1999
rate of progress (ROP) plans, revisions to
contingency measures and revisions to
the area’s attainment demonstration.
As a part of Virginia’s strategy to meet
its portion of the necessary emission
reductions, the Commonwealth adopted
new measures to control volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from four
additional source categories, including a
regulation to control emissions from
solvent metal cleaning operations.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On February 23, 2004, the
Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a
formal revision to its SIP. The SIP
revision consisted of four new
regulations added to 9 VAC 5, Chapter
40, amendments to one existing article
of 9 VAC 5 Chapter 20, and
amendments to 9 VAC 5, Chapter 20 to
incorporate by reference additional test
methods and procedures. The revision
also included amendments to section B
of 9 VAC 5–40–3260 (Rule 4–24)
pertaining to emissions standards for
solvent metal cleaning operations using
non-halogenated solvents. This action
addresses Rule 4–24 only. The
remaining portions of the submittal
have been the subject of separate
rulemaking actions.
On June 9, 2004 (69 FR 32277), EPA
published a direct final rulemaking
action approving the Commonwealth’s
solvent metal cleaning operations
regulation for the Northern Virginia
portion of the Metropolitan DC ozone
nonattainment area (Northern Virginia
Area) into the SIP. This regulation was
based on the Ozone Transport
Commission’s (OTC) model rule. The
Virginia solvent metal cleaning
regulation entitled, ‘‘Emission
Standards for Solvent Metal Cleaning
Operations in the Northern Virginia
VOC Emission Control Area’’ (Rule 4–
E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM
17MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 17, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28213-28215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-9745]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 254
USPS Standards for Facility Accessibility
AGENCY: Postal Service
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C.
4151 et. seq. (2000), the United States Postal Service is revising its
standards for facility accessibility and adding them to the CFR. These
revisions are made in response to the Americans with Disabilities Act/
Architectural Barriers Act Guidelines (ADAAG/ABAAG) recently published
by the U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board
(US Access Board).
DATES: Effective: October 1, 2005, with applicability dates as follows:
For owned facilities, these standards are applicable
effective on October 1, 2005 for all Postal Service facility designs
that have not reached 30% design completion by October 1, 2005 and for
all design/build contracts for which the solicitation is issued after
October 1, 2005.
For leased facilities, these standards are applicable
effective on October 1, 2005 for new construction, additions, and
alterations and alternate quarters with designs that have not reached
30% completion by October 1, 2005.
For all existing leased facilities, these standards are
applicable effective on October 1, 2005 for all new leases
[[Page 28214]]
signed on or after October 1, 2005. The unilateral exercise of a
previously negotiated lease option is not considered a new lease for
purposes of these standards.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Koetting, Attorney, U.S. Postal
Service, (202) 268-4818.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The US Access Board recently adopted
Guidelines to implement the Americans with Disabilities Act and the
Architectural Barriers Act at 69 FR 44084, July 23, 2004, codified at
36 CFR part 1191. It is the Postal Service's intent to adopt the
Guidelines pertaining to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (42
U.S.C. 4151 et seq.), which are found in 36 CFR Part 1191, with the
exception of the Advisory Notes. As a matter of policy, the Advisory
Notes will be included in the Postal Service's revised Handbook RE-4,
``Standards for Facility Accessibility,'' which is an internal guidance
document published for the benefit of Postal Service employees.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 254
Buildings and Facilities, Individuals with Disabilities, Postal
Service
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Postal Service amends 39
CFR chapter 1 by adding a new part 254 to read as follows:
PART 254--POSTAL SERVICE STANDARDS FOR FACILITY ACCESSIBILITY
PURSUANT TO THE ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS ACT
Sec.
254.1 Adoption of U.S. Access Board Standards as Postal Service
Standards of Facility Accessibility
254.2 Definition of primary function area and criteria used to
determine whether an alteration has an effect on an area containing
a primary function that is disproportionate to the overall
alterations.
Authority: 39 U.S.C 101, 401, 403; 29 U.S.C. 792(b)(3) and 42
U.S.C. 12204.
Sec. 254.1 Adoption of U.S. Access Board Standards as Postal Service
Standards of Facility Accessibility.
(a) The United States Postal Service adopts as its Architectural
Barriers Act (ABA) ``Standards for Facility Accessibility,'' the
following sections of 36 CFR part 1191:
Appendix A to Part 1191, Table of Contents for apps. C, D, and E.
Appendix C to Part 1191, Architectural Barriers Act, Scoping (which
contains ABA Chapter 1, Application and Administration, and ABA Chapter
2, Scoping requirements); pertinent parts of Appendix D to Part 1191,
Technical (which includes Chapters 3 through 10).
Appendix E to Part 1191, List of Figures and Index.
(b) These sections listed in paragraph (a) of this section are
adopted verbatim, with the exception of the Advisory Notes, which are
expressly excluded.
Sec. 254.2 Definition of primary function area and criteria used to
determine whether an alteration has an effect on an area containing a
primary function that is disproportionate to the overall alterations.
(a) Terminology. The new accessibility guidelines require that
certain terms be defined by the participating federal agencies. In the
U.S. Access Board's 36 CFR part 1191, Appendix C, ABA chapter 2,
section F202.6.2 requires that ``primary function areas'' be defined
and Section F202.4 contains requirements for alterations affecting
``primary function areas'' stating, ``* * *an alteration that affects
or could affect the usability of or access to an area containing a
primary function shall be made so as to ensure that, to the maximum
extent feasible, the path of travel to the altered area, including the
rest rooms, telephones, and drinking fountains serving the altered
area, are readily accessible to and usable by individuals with
disabilities, unless such alterations are disproportionate to the
overall alterations in terms of cost and scope as determined under
criteria established by the Administrator of * * * the United States
Postal Service.''
(b) Primary function areas. For purposes of this part, the primary
function of the Postal Service is to provide mail service for its
customers, that is to accept, distribute, transport and deliver the
mail. Two essential facilities for fulfilling these functions are
customer lobby areas where customers conduct their retail transactions,
access mail depositories and post office boxes and work room areas
where postal employees distribute the mail and perform other core
postal operations. Therefore, for purposes of the accessibility
guidelines applicable to the Postal Service under the Architectural
Barriers Act, two primary function areas are identified: Customer
Lobbies and Workroom Areas.
(c) Disproportionality. (1) According to Section F202.6.2,
``alteration'' of elements in a primary function area can trigger a
requirement to make accessibility improvements along the path of travel
to the area and improvements to rest rooms, telephones, and drinking
fountains that serve the altered area if the alteration ``affects or
could affect the usability of or access to an area containing a primary
function.'' It is conceivable that almost any repair or alteration
project in a ``primary function area'' could affect the usability of
the area. Therefore a literal interpretation of this provision could
require an expansion of the scope of virtually any alteration in a
primary function area, regardless of the size and scope of the original
project. According to Section F202.6.2, accessibility improvements must
be made to the path of travel to the altered area and to rest rooms,
telephones, and drinking fountains that serve the altered area ``unless
such alterations are disproportionate to the overall alterations in
terms of cost and scope''. (2) For purposes of the accessibility
guidelines applicable to the Postal Service under the Architectural
Barriers Act, two criteria must be considered in making a determination
whether accessibility improvements are disproportionate to the cost and
scope of the original alteration: a magnitude threshold for the
original alteration and a maximum ``percentage threshold'' for the
accessibility alteration.
(d) Magnitude threshold. It is anticipated that, in most cases, a
significant additional effort would be required to assess physical
conditions along the path of travel and for rest rooms, telephones, and
drinking fountains that serve the altered area, and to determine the
scope, budget and appropriate design requirements for any corrective
alterations. Unless the original alteration is of substantial
magnitude, a disproportionate effort would be devoted to such
investigation, design, and administration leaving few, if any funds to
accomplish corrective work. Accordingly, a ``magnitude threshold'' is
established such that no accessibility improvements to the path of
travel, nor to any associated facilities, shall be required under
F202.6.2 for alterations that have an estimated total cost less than 20
percent of the fair market value of the facility.
(e) Percentage threshold. For alterations subject to F202.6.2 that
meet or exceed the ``magnitude threshold,'' the maximum cost for
accessibility improvements to the path of travel, including all costs
for accessibility improvements to rest rooms, telephones, and drinking
fountains that serve the altered area, shall not exceed 20 percent of
the total cost of the original alteration. Costs for accessibility
improvements in excess of the 20
[[Page 28215]]
percent threshold shall be deemed ``disproportionate.''
Neva Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 05-9745 Filed 5-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P