Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of Pregabalin into Schedule V, 25502-25505 [05-9634]
Download as PDF
25502
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 92 / Friday, May 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any 1 year.’’ FDA has determined that
this proposed rule does not constitute a
significant regulatory action under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
VIII. Environmental Impact
FDA has determined under 21 CFR
25.32(p) that this action is of a type that
does not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act
FDA concludes that this proposed
rule contains no collection of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). Therefore, clearance by the Office
of Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is not
required.
X. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles set
forth in Executive Order 13132. We
have determined that the rule does not
contain policies that have substantial
direct effects on the States or on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibility
among the various levels of government.
Accordingly, FDA has concluded that
the proposed rule does not contain
policies that have federalism
implications as defined in the Executive
order and, consequently, a federalism
summary impact statement is not
required.
XI. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments in response to FDA’s
proposed rule. Submit a single copy of
electronic comments or two paper
copies of any mailed comments, except
that individuals may submit one paper
copy. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
XII. Proposed Effective Date
FDA proposes that any final
regulation that may issue based on this
proposal become effective 30 days after
its date of publication in the Federal
Register.
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:47 May 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
XIII. References
The following references have been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
1. McNeil Nutritionals, ‘‘Petition to Amend
21 CFR 101.80 to Authorize a
Noncariogenicity Dental Health Claim for
Sucralose,’’ CP–1, Docket No. 2004P–0294,
April 2, 2004.
2. U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, ‘‘Oral Health,’’ chapter 21, Healthy
People 2010, volume II, part B, 2d ed.,
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
Office (www.health.gov/healthypeople/
Document/HTML/Volume2/21Oral.htm,
visited 03/17/2005), November 2000.
3. G.A. Miller, ‘‘Sucralose,’’ Alternative
Sweeteners, 2d ed. L.O. Nabors and R.C.
Gelardi, eds. Marcel Dekker, Atlanta, pp.
173–175, 1991.
¨
4. P. Lingstrom, T. Imfeld, and D. Birkhed,
‘‘Comparison of Three Different Methods for
Measurement of Plaque-pH in Humans After
Consumption of Soft Bread and Potato
Chips,’’ Journal of Dental Research, 72:865–
870, 1993.
5. D.S. Harper, R. Gray, J.W. Lenke, et al.,
‘‘Measurement of Human Plaque Acidity:
Comparison of Interdental Touch and
Indwelling Electrodes,’’ Caries Research,
19:536–546, 1985.
6. M.E. Jensen and C.F. Schachtele,
‘‘Plaque pH Measurements by Different
Methods on the Buccal and Approximal
Surfaces of Human Teeth After Sucrose
Rinse,’’ Journal of Dental Research, 62:1058–
1061, 1983.
7. L.M. Steinberg, F. Odusola, J. Yip, et al.,
‘‘Effect of Aqueous Solutions of Sucralose on
Plaque pH,’’ American Journal of Dentistry,
8:209–211, 1995.
8. L.M. Steinberg, F. Odusola, J. Yip, et al.,
‘‘Effect of Sucralose in Coffee on Plaque pH
in Human Subjects,’’ Caries Research,
30:138–142, 1996.
9. C. Meyerowitz, E.P. Syrrakov, and R.F.
Raubertas, ‘‘Effect of Sucralose—Alone or
Bulked With Maltodextrin and/or Dextrose—
on Plaque pH in Humans,’’ Caries Research,
30:439–444, 1996.
10. D.A. Young and W.H. Bowen, ‘‘The
Influence of Sucralose on Bacterial
Metabolism,’’ Journal of Dental Research,
69:1480–1484, 1990.
11. D.B. Drucker and J. Verron,
‘‘Comparative Effects of the Substance
Sweeteners Glucose, Sorbitol, Sucrose,
Xylitol, and Trichlorosucrose on Lowering of
pH by Two Oral Streptococcus Mutans
Strains In Vitro,’’ Archives of Oral Biology,
24:965–970, 1980.
12. W.H. Bowen, D.A. Young, and S.K.
Pearson, ‘‘The Effects of Sucralose on
Coronal and Root-Surface Caries,’’ Journal of
Dental Research, 69:1485–1487, 1990.
13. W.H. Bowen, S.K. Pearson, and J.L.
Falany, ‘‘Influence of Sweetening Agents in
Solution on Dental Caries in Desalivated
Rats,’’ Archives of Oral Biology, 35:839–844,
1990.
14. Department of Health and Human
Services, Results of National Oral Health
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Survey Results Released (press release)
(https://www.hhs.gov/news/press/1996pres/
960311.html, visited on 03/17/2005), March
11, 1996.
15. U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Oral Health in America: A Report
of the Surgeon General—Executive
Summary, Rockville, MD, U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services, National
Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research,
National Institutes of Health, (https://
www2.nidcr.nih.gov/sgr/execsumm.htm,
visited on 03/17/2005), 2000.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 101
Food labeling, Nutrition, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 101 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 101—FOOD LABELING
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 101 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1453, 1454, 1455; 21
U.S.C. 321, 331, 342, 343, 348, 371; 42 U.S.C.
243, 264, 271.
2. Section 101.80 is amended by
adding (c)(2)(ii)(C) and (e)(1)(v) to read
as follows:
§ 101.80 Health claims: dietary
noncariogenic carbohydrate sweeteners
and dental caries.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) Sucralose.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) Frequent eating of foods high in
sugars and starches as between-meal
snacks can promote tooth decay.
Sucralose, the sweetening ingredient
used to sweeten this food, unlike sugars,
does not promote tooth decay.
Dated: May 4, 2005..
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–9608 Filed 5–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–267P]
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Placement of Pregabalin into Schedule
V
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 92 / Friday, May 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
ACTION:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: This proposed rule is issued
by the Deputy Administrator of the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA) to
place the substance pregabalin [(S)-3(aminomethyl)-5-methylhexanoic acid],
including its salts, and all products
containing pregabalin into Schedule V
of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).
This proposed action is based on a
recommendation from the Acting
Assistant Secretary for Health of the
Department of Health and Human
Services (DHHS) and on an evaluation
of the relevant data by DEA. If finalized,
this action will impose the regulatory
controls and criminal sanctions
applicable to Schedule V non-narcotics
on those who handle pregabalin and
products containing pregabalin.
DATES: Written comments must be
postmarked, and electronic comments
must be sent, on or before June 13, 2005.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling
of comments, please reference ‘‘Docket
No. DEA–267P’’ on all written and
electronic correspondence. Written
comments being sent via regular mail
should be sent to the Deputy
Administrator, Drug Enforcement
Administration, Washington, DC 20537,
Attention: DEA Federal Register
Representative/ODL. Written comments
sent via express mail should be sent to
the Deputy Administrator, Drug
Enforcement Administration, Attention:
DEA Federal Register Representative/
ODL, 2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway,
Alexandria, VA 22301. Comments may
be directly sent to DEA electronically by
sending an electronic message to
dea.diversion.policy@usdoj.gov.
Comments may also be sent
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov using the
electronic comment form provided on
that site. An electronic copy of this
document is also available at the
https://www.regulations.gov Web site.
DEA will accept electronic comments
containing MS Word, WordPerfect,
Adobe PDF, or Excel file formats only.
DEA will not accept any file format
other than those specifically listed here.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine Sannerud, Ph.D., Chief, Drug
and Chemical Evaluation Section, Drug
Enforcement Administration,
Washington, DC 20537, (202) 307–7183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Note Regarding This Scheduling Action
In accordance with the provisions of
the Controlled Substances Act (21
U.S.C. 811(a)), this action is a formal
rulemaking ‘‘on the record after
opportunity for a hearing.’’ Such
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:47 May 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
proceedings are conducted pursuant to
the provisions of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 556 and 557).
Interested persons are invited to submit
their comments, objections or requests
for a hearing with regard to this
proposal. Requests for a hearing should
be made in accordance with 21 CFR
1308.44 and should state, with
particularity, the issues concerning
which the person desires to be heard.
All correspondence regarding this
matter should be submitted to the Drug
Enforcement Administration using the
address information provided above.
Background
On December 31, 2004, the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) approved
pregabalin [(S)-3-(aminomethyl)-5methylhexanoic acid] for marketing
under the trade name LyricaTM.
LyricaTM will be marketed in the United
States as a prescription drug product for
the management of neuropathic pain
associated with diabetic peripheral
neuropathy (DPN) and postherpetic
neuralgia (PHN). Pregabalin has recently
been placed on the market in some
European countries for the treatment of
epilepsy and neuropathic pain.
Unlike morphine-type analgesics,
pregabalin does not produce analgesia
through binding at opioid receptors.
While pregabalin is an analog of gammaaminobutyric acid (GABA), a major
inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain,
it does not bind at GABA or
benzodiazepine receptors nor alter
GABA concentrations in the brain.
Pregabalin does bind with high affinity
to the alpha 2-delta receptor site (a
subunit of voltage-gated calcium
channels) in the central nervous system.
The binding of pregabalin at this site is
thought to be responsible for its
therapeutic effect on neuropathic pain.
Pregabalin has been shown to produce
effects that are similar to other
controlled substances. In a study with
recreational users of sedative/hypnotic
drugs, a 450 mg dose of pregabalin
resulted in subjective ratings of ‘‘good
drug effect,’’ ‘‘high,’’ and ‘‘liking’’
similar to 30 mg of diazepam. In clinical
studies, pregabalin showed an adverse
event profile similar to other central
nervous system depressants. Some of
these effects included dizziness,
somnolence, ataxia, and confusion.
Following abrupt or rapid
discontinuation of pregabalin, some
patients reported symptoms suggestive
of physical dependence. The FDA
determined that the dependence profile
of pregabalin, as measured by a patient
physical withdrawal checklist, was
quantitatively less than benzodiazepines
in schedule IV of the CSA.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25503
On April 4, 2005, the Acting Assistant
Secretary for Health of the DHHS sent
the Administrator of the DEA a
scientific and medical evaluation and a
letter recommending that pregabalin be
placed into Schedule V of the CSA.
Enclosed with the April 4, 2005, letter
was a document prepared by the FDA
entitled, ‘‘Basis for the Recommendation
for Control of Pregabalin in Schedule V
of the Controlled Substances Act
(CSA).’’ The document contained a
review of the factors which the CSA
requires the Secretary to consider (21
U.S.C. 811(b)).
The factors considered by the Acting
Assistant Secretary of Health and DEA
with respect to pregabalin were:
(1) Its actual or relative potential for
abuse;
(2) Scientific evidence of its
pharmacological effects;
(3) The state of current scientific
knowledge regarding the drug;
(4) Its history and current pattern of
abuse;
(5) The scope, duration, and
significance of abuse;
(6) What, if any, risk there is to the
public health;
(7) Its psychic or physiological
dependence liability; and
(8) Whether the substance is an
immediate precursor of a substance
already controlled under this
subchapter. (21 U.S.C. 811(c))
Based on the recommendation of the
Acting Assistant Secretary for Health,
received in accordance with section
201(b) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 811(b)), and
the independent review of the available
data by the DEA, the Deputy
Administrator of the DEA, pursuant to
sections 201(a) and 201(b) of the Act (21
U.S.C. 811(a) and 811(b)), finds that:
(1) Based on information now
available, pregabalin has a low potential
for abuse relative to the drugs or other
substances in Schedule IV;
(2) Pregabalin has a currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the
United States; and
(3) Abuse of pregabalin may lead to
limited physical dependence or
psychological dependence relative to
the drugs or other substances in
Schedule IV. (21 U.S.C. 812(b)(5))
Based on these findings, the Deputy
Administrator of the DEA concludes
that pregabalin, including its salts, and
all products containing pregabalin,
warrant control in Schedule V of the
CSA.
Interested persons are invited to
submit their comments, objections or
requests for a hearing with regard to this
proposal. Requests for a hearing should
state, with particularity, the issues
concerning which the person desires to
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
25504
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 92 / Friday, May 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
be heard. All correspondence regarding
this matter should be submitted to the
Drug Enforcement Administration using
the address information provided above.
In the event that comments, objections,
or requests for a hearing raise one or
more issues which the Deputy
Administrator finds warrant a hearing,
the Deputy Administrator shall order a
public hearing by notice in the Federal
Register, summarizing the issues to be
heard and setting the time for the
hearing.
Requirements for Handling Pregabalin
If this rule is finalized as proposed,
pregabalin and all products containing
pregabalin would be subject to the
Controlled Substances Act and the
Controlled Substances Import and
Export Act regulatory controls and
administrative, civil and criminal
sanctions applicable to the manufacture,
distribution, dispensing, importing and
exporting of a Schedule V controlled
substance, including the following:
Registration. Any person who
manufactures, distributes, dispenses,
imports, exports, engages in research or
conducts instructional activities with
pregabalin, or who desires to
manufacture, distribute, dispense,
import, export, engage in instructional
activities or conduct research with
pregabalin, would need to be registered
to conduct such activities in accordance
with Part 1301 of Title 21 of the Code
of Federal Regulations.
Security. Pregabalin would be subject
to Schedule III–V security requirements
and must be manufactured, distributed
and stored in accordance with
§§ 1301.71, 1301.72(b), (c), and (d),
1301.73, 1301.74, 1301.75(b) and (c),
1301.76, and 1301.77 of Title 21 of the
Code of Federal Regulations.
Labeling and Packaging. All labels
and labeling for commercial containers
of pregabalin which are distributed on
or after finalization of this rule would
need to comply with requirements of
§§ 1302.03–1302.07 of Title 21 of the
Code of Federal Regulations.
Inventory. Every registrant required to
keep records and who possesses any
quantity of pregabalin would be
required to keep an inventory of all
stocks of pregabalin on hand pursuant
to §§ 1304.03, 1304.04 and 1304.11 of
Title 21 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. Every registrant who
desires registration in Schedule V for
pregabalin would be required to
conduct an inventory of all stocks of the
substance on hand at the time of
registration.
Records. All registrants would be
required to keep records pursuant to
§§ 1304.03, 1304.04, 1304.21, 1304.22,
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:47 May 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
and 1304.23 of Title 21 of the Code of
Federal Regulations.
Prescriptions. All prescriptions for
pregabalin or prescriptions for products
containing pregabalin would be
required to be issued pursuant to 21
CFR 1306.03–1306.06 and 1306.21,
1306.23–1306.27.
Importation and Exportation. All
importation and exportation of
pregabalin would need to be in
compliance with part 1312 of Title 21 of
the Code of Federal Regulations.
Criminal Liability. Any activity with
pregabalin not authorized by, or in
violation of, the Controlled Substances
Act or the Controlled Substances Import
and Export Act occurring on or after
finalization of this proposed rule would
be unlawful.
Regulatory Certifications
Executive Order 12866
In accordance with the provisions of
the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(a)), this action
is a formal rulemaking ‘‘on the record
after opportunity for a hearing.’’ Such
proceedings are conducted pursuant to
the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557
and, as such, are exempt from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
pursuant to Executive Order 12866,
section 3(d)(1).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Deputy Administrator, in
accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), has
reviewed this proposed rule and by
approving it certifies that it will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Pregabalin products will be prescription
drugs used for the treatment of
neuropathic pain. Handlers of
pregabalin often handle other controlled
substances used to treat pain which are
already subject to the regulatory
requirements of the CSA.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable
standards set forth in Sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 Civil
Justice Reform.
Executive Order 13132
This rulemaking does not preempt or
modify any provision of state law; nor
does it impose enforcement
responsibilities on any state; nor does it
diminish the power of any state to
enforce its own laws. Accordingly, this
rulemaking does not have federalism
implications warranting the application
of Executive Order 13132.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $115,000,000 or more
in any one year, and will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under provisions of
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by § 804 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996. This rule will not result in an
annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase
in costs or prices: or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign
based companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drug traffic control,
Narcotics, Prescription drugs.
Under the authority vested in the
Attorney General by section 201(a) of
the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(a)), and
delegated to the Administrator of DEA
by Department of Justice regulations (28
CFR 0.100), and redelegated to the
Deputy Administrator pursuant to 28
CFR 0.104, the Deputy Administrator
hereby proposes that 21 CFR part 1308
be amended as follows:
PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 1308 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b)
unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 1308.15 is proposed to be
amended by adding a new paragraph (e)
to read as follows:
§ 1308.15
Schedule V.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Depressants. Unless specifically
exempted or excluded or unless listed
in another schedule, any material,
compound, mixture, or preparation
which contains any quantity of the
following substances having a
depressant effect on the central nervous
system, including its salts:
(1) Pregabalin [(S)-3-(aminomethyl)-5methylhexanoic acid]—2782
(2) [Reserved]
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 92 / Friday, May 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Dated: May 6, 2005.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05–9634 Filed 5–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD01–05–041]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Beverly Homecoming
Fireworks, Beverly, MA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone for the
Beverly Homecoming Fireworks in
Beverly, Massachusetts. This safety zone
is necessary to protect the life and
property of the maritime public from
potential hazards associated with a
fireworks display. The safety zone
would temporarily prohibit entry into or
movement within this portion of
Beverly Harbor during the closure
period.
Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
June 13, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Coast Guard
Sector Boston, 427 Commercial Street,
Boston, MA 02109. Sector Boston
maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking. Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket are part of
docket CGD01–05–041 and are available
for inspection or copying at Sector
Boston, 427 Commercial Street, Boston,
MA, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chief Petty Officer Paul English, Sector
Boston, Waterways Safety and Response
Division, at (617) 223–3010.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD01–05–041),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:47 May 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know that your submission reached
us, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
We may change this proposed rule in
view of them.
25505
Regulatory Evaluation
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to Sector
Boston at the address under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
This rule proposes to establish a
safety zone in Beverly Harbor within a
400-yard radius of the fireworks barge
located at approximate position
42°32′35″ N, 070°52′00″ W. The safety
zone would be in effect from 8 p.m.
until 10:30 p.m. EDT on August 7, 2005.
The safety zone would temporarily
restrict movement within the effected
portion of Beverly Harbor and is needed
to protect the maritime public from the
dangers posed by a fireworks display.
Marine traffic may transit safely outside
of the safety zone during the effective
period. The Captain of the Port does not
anticipate any negative impact on vessel
traffic due to this event. Public
notifications will be made prior to the
effective period of this proposed rule via
safety marine information broadcasts
and Local Notice to Mariners.
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
The Coast Guard expects the
economic impact of this proposed rule
to be so minimal that a full Regulatory
Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Although this rule will prevent traffic
from transiting a portion of Beverly
Harbor during the effective period, the
effects of this rule will not be significant
for several reasons: vessels will only be
excluded from the proscribed area for
two and one half hours, vessels will be
able to operate in the majority of
Beverly Harbor during this time, and
advance notifications will be made to
the local maritime community by
marine information broadcasts and
Local Notice to Mariners.
Small Entities
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone in Beverly
Harbor, Beverly, Massachusetts. The
safety zone would be in effect from 8
p.m. until 10:30 p.m. EDT on August 7,
2005. Marine traffic may transit safely
outside of the safety zone in the
majority of Beverly Harbor during the
event. This safety zone will control
vessel traffic during the fireworks
display to protect the safety of the
maritime public.
Due to the limited timeframe of the
fireworks display and because the zone
leaves the majority of Beverly Harbor
open for navigation, the Captain of the
Port anticipates minimal negative
impact on vessel traffic due to this
event. Public notifications will be made
prior to the effective period via Local
Notice to Mariners and marine
information broadcasts.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which may
be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in effected portion of Beverly
Harbor from 8 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. EDT
on August 7, 2005.
This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: this proposed
rule would be in effect for only two and
one half hours, vessel traffic can safely
pass around the safety zone during the
effected period, and advance
notifications will be made to the local
maritime community by marine
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 92 (Friday, May 13, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25502-25505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-9634]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA-267P]
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of Pregabalin into
Schedule V
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.
[[Page 25503]]
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule is issued by the Deputy Administrator of
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to place the substance
pregabalin [(S)-3-(aminomethyl)-5-methylhexanoic acid], including its
salts, and all products containing pregabalin into Schedule V of the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA). This proposed action is based on a
recommendation from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Health of the
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and on an evaluation of
the relevant data by DEA. If finalized, this action will impose the
regulatory controls and criminal sanctions applicable to Schedule V
non-narcotics on those who handle pregabalin and products containing
pregabalin.
DATES: Written comments must be postmarked, and electronic comments
must be sent, on or before June 13, 2005.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling of comments, please reference
``Docket No. DEA-267P'' on all written and electronic correspondence.
Written comments being sent via regular mail should be sent to the
Deputy Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration, Washington, DC
20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL. Written
comments sent via express mail should be sent to the Deputy
Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal
Register Representative/ODL, 2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway, Alexandria,
VA 22301. Comments may be directly sent to DEA electronically by
sending an electronic message to dea.diversion.policy@usdoj.gov.
Comments may also be sent electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov using the electronic comment form provided on that
site. An electronic copy of this document is also available at the
https://www.regulations.gov Web site. DEA will accept electronic
comments containing MS Word, WordPerfect, Adobe PDF, or Excel file
formats only. DEA will not accept any file format other than those
specifically listed here.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Sannerud, Ph.D., Chief, Drug
and Chemical Evaluation Section, Drug Enforcement Administration,
Washington, DC 20537, (202) 307-7183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Note Regarding This Scheduling Action
In accordance with the provisions of the Controlled Substances Act
(21 U.S.C. 811(a)), this action is a formal rulemaking ``on the record
after opportunity for a hearing.'' Such proceedings are conducted
pursuant to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. 556 and 557). Interested persons are invited to submit their
comments, objections or requests for a hearing with regard to this
proposal. Requests for a hearing should be made in accordance with 21
CFR 1308.44 and should state, with particularity, the issues concerning
which the person desires to be heard. All correspondence regarding this
matter should be submitted to the Drug Enforcement Administration using
the address information provided above.
Background
On December 31, 2004, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
approved pregabalin [(S)-3-(aminomethyl)-5-methylhexanoic acid] for
marketing under the trade name LyricaTM. LyricaTM
will be marketed in the United States as a prescription drug product
for the management of neuropathic pain associated with diabetic
peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN).
Pregabalin has recently been placed on the market in some European
countries for the treatment of epilepsy and neuropathic pain.
Unlike morphine-type analgesics, pregabalin does not produce
analgesia through binding at opioid receptors. While pregabalin is an
analog of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), a major inhibitory
neurotransmitter in the brain, it does not bind at GABA or
benzodiazepine receptors nor alter GABA concentrations in the brain.
Pregabalin does bind with high affinity to the alpha 2-delta receptor
site (a subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels) in the central
nervous system. The binding of pregabalin at this site is thought to be
responsible for its therapeutic effect on neuropathic pain.
Pregabalin has been shown to produce effects that are similar to
other controlled substances. In a study with recreational users of
sedative/hypnotic drugs, a 450 mg dose of pregabalin resulted in
subjective ratings of ``good drug effect,'' ``high,'' and ``liking''
similar to 30 mg of diazepam. In clinical studies, pregabalin showed an
adverse event profile similar to other central nervous system
depressants. Some of these effects included dizziness, somnolence,
ataxia, and confusion. Following abrupt or rapid discontinuation of
pregabalin, some patients reported symptoms suggestive of physical
dependence. The FDA determined that the dependence profile of
pregabalin, as measured by a patient physical withdrawal checklist, was
quantitatively less than benzodiazepines in schedule IV of the CSA.
On April 4, 2005, the Acting Assistant Secretary for Health of the
DHHS sent the Administrator of the DEA a scientific and medical
evaluation and a letter recommending that pregabalin be placed into
Schedule V of the CSA. Enclosed with the April 4, 2005, letter was a
document prepared by the FDA entitled, ``Basis for the Recommendation
for Control of Pregabalin in Schedule V of the Controlled Substances
Act (CSA).'' The document contained a review of the factors which the
CSA requires the Secretary to consider (21 U.S.C. 811(b)).
The factors considered by the Acting Assistant Secretary of Health
and DEA with respect to pregabalin were:
(1) Its actual or relative potential for abuse;
(2) Scientific evidence of its pharmacological effects;
(3) The state of current scientific knowledge regarding the drug;
(4) Its history and current pattern of abuse;
(5) The scope, duration, and significance of abuse;
(6) What, if any, risk there is to the public health;
(7) Its psychic or physiological dependence liability; and
(8) Whether the substance is an immediate precursor of a substance
already controlled under this subchapter. (21 U.S.C. 811(c))
Based on the recommendation of the Acting Assistant Secretary for
Health, received in accordance with section 201(b) of the Act (21
U.S.C. 811(b)), and the independent review of the available data by the
DEA, the Deputy Administrator of the DEA, pursuant to sections 201(a)
and 201(b) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 811(a) and 811(b)), finds that:
(1) Based on information now available, pregabalin has a low
potential for abuse relative to the drugs or other substances in
Schedule IV;
(2) Pregabalin has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in
the United States; and
(3) Abuse of pregabalin may lead to limited physical dependence or
psychological dependence relative to the drugs or other substances in
Schedule IV. (21 U.S.C. 812(b)(5))
Based on these findings, the Deputy Administrator of the DEA
concludes that pregabalin, including its salts, and all products
containing pregabalin, warrant control in Schedule V of the CSA.
Interested persons are invited to submit their comments, objections
or requests for a hearing with regard to this proposal. Requests for a
hearing should state, with particularity, the issues concerning which
the person desires to
[[Page 25504]]
be heard. All correspondence regarding this matter should be submitted
to the Drug Enforcement Administration using the address information
provided above. In the event that comments, objections, or requests for
a hearing raise one or more issues which the Deputy Administrator finds
warrant a hearing, the Deputy Administrator shall order a public
hearing by notice in the Federal Register, summarizing the issues to be
heard and setting the time for the hearing.
Requirements for Handling Pregabalin
If this rule is finalized as proposed, pregabalin and all products
containing pregabalin would be subject to the Controlled Substances Act
and the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act regulatory controls
and administrative, civil and criminal sanctions applicable to the
manufacture, distribution, dispensing, importing and exporting of a
Schedule V controlled substance, including the following:
Registration. Any person who manufactures, distributes, dispenses,
imports, exports, engages in research or conducts instructional
activities with pregabalin, or who desires to manufacture, distribute,
dispense, import, export, engage in instructional activities or conduct
research with pregabalin, would need to be registered to conduct such
activities in accordance with Part 1301 of Title 21 of the Code of
Federal Regulations.
Security. Pregabalin would be subject to Schedule III-V security
requirements and must be manufactured, distributed and stored in
accordance with Sec. Sec. 1301.71, 1301.72(b), (c), and (d), 1301.73,
1301.74, 1301.75(b) and (c), 1301.76, and 1301.77 of Title 21 of the
Code of Federal Regulations.
Labeling and Packaging. All labels and labeling for commercial
containers of pregabalin which are distributed on or after finalization
of this rule would need to comply with requirements of Sec. Sec.
1302.03-1302.07 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
Inventory. Every registrant required to keep records and who
possesses any quantity of pregabalin would be required to keep an
inventory of all stocks of pregabalin on hand pursuant to Sec. Sec.
1304.03, 1304.04 and 1304.11 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. Every registrant who desires registration in Schedule V
for pregabalin would be required to conduct an inventory of all stocks
of the substance on hand at the time of registration.
Records. All registrants would be required to keep records pursuant
to Sec. Sec. 1304.03, 1304.04, 1304.21, 1304.22, and 1304.23 of Title
21 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
Prescriptions. All prescriptions for pregabalin or prescriptions
for products containing pregabalin would be required to be issued
pursuant to 21 CFR 1306.03-1306.06 and 1306.21, 1306.23-1306.27.
Importation and Exportation. All importation and exportation of
pregabalin would need to be in compliance with part 1312 of Title 21 of
the Code of Federal Regulations.
Criminal Liability. Any activity with pregabalin not authorized by,
or in violation of, the Controlled Substances Act or the Controlled
Substances Import and Export Act occurring on or after finalization of
this proposed rule would be unlawful.
Regulatory Certifications
Executive Order 12866
In accordance with the provisions of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(a)),
this action is a formal rulemaking ``on the record after opportunity
for a hearing.'' Such proceedings are conducted pursuant to the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557 and, as such, are exempt from review
by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to Executive Order
12866, section 3(d)(1).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Deputy Administrator, in accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed this proposed rule and
by approving it certifies that it will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Pregabalin products
will be prescription drugs used for the treatment of neuropathic pain.
Handlers of pregabalin often handle other controlled substances used to
treat pain which are already subject to the regulatory requirements of
the CSA.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in
Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice
Reform.
Executive Order 13132
This rulemaking does not preempt or modify any provision of state
law; nor does it impose enforcement responsibilities on any state; nor
does it diminish the power of any state to enforce its own laws.
Accordingly, this rulemaking does not have federalism implications
warranting the application of Executive Order 13132.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$115,000,000 or more in any one year, and will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by Sec. 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rule will
not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more;
a major increase in costs or prices: or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign
based companies in domestic and export markets.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and procedure, Drug traffic control,
Narcotics, Prescription drugs.
Under the authority vested in the Attorney General by section
201(a) of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(a)), and delegated to the
Administrator of DEA by Department of Justice regulations (28 CFR
0.100), and redelegated to the Deputy Administrator pursuant to 28 CFR
0.104, the Deputy Administrator hereby proposes that 21 CFR part 1308
be amended as follows:
PART 1308--SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES [AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 1308 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b) unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 1308.15 is proposed to be amended by adding a new
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 1308.15 Schedule V.
* * * * *
(e) Depressants. Unless specifically exempted or excluded or unless
listed in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or
preparation which contains any quantity of the following substances
having a depressant effect on the central nervous system, including its
salts:
(1) Pregabalin [(S)-3-(aminomethyl)-5-methylhexanoic acid]--2782
(2) [Reserved]
[[Page 25505]]
Dated: May 6, 2005.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-9634 Filed 5-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P