Influenza Vaccination of Healthcare Workers in Hospitals, 25072-25075 [05-9455]
Download as PDF
25072
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 91 / Thursday, May 12, 2005 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Influenza Vaccination of Healthcare
Workers in Hospitals
Announcement Type: New.
Funding Opportunity Number: RFA
IP05–089.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 93.185.
Letter of Intent Deadline: June 13,
2005.
Application Deadline: June 27, 2005.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Section 311 [42 U.S.C. 243]
and 317 (k)(1) [42 U.S.C. 247b (k)(1)] of
the Public Health Service Act, as
amended.
Background: Healthcare workers have
been included in the Annual Advisory
Committee for Immunization Practices
recommendations for over 20 years.
Influenza vaccination coverage remains
low, under 40 percent in the 2002
National Health Interview Survey. The
rationale for including healthcare
workers has been that healthcare
workers can serve as vectors of
influenza virus. Another rationale for
promoting vaccination of healthcare
workers is that health care workers who
themselves are vaccinated may be better
advocates of influenza vaccination.
Multifaceted approaches which include
several components, such as
convenience of vaccination (e.g. mobile
carts, peer vaccination), free vaccine,
education, and outreach appear to be
the most effective (1–3).
1. Habib S, Rishpon S, Rubin L.
‘‘Influenza vaccination among
healthcare workers’’. ‘‘Isr Med Assoc J.
2000’’; 2:899–901.
2. Nichol KL, Hauge M. ‘‘Influenza
vaccination of healthcare workers’’.
‘‘Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997’’;
18(3):189–194.
3. Bryant KA, Stover B, Cain L, Siegel
J, Jarvis W. ‘‘Improving influenza
immunization rates among healthcare
workers caring for high risk pediatric
patients’’. ‘‘Infect Control Hosp
Epidemiol’’ (in press)
Purpose: The purpose of the program
is to fund research to identify effective,
feasible, and sustainable methods to
increase influenza vaccination of health
care workers in hospital settings, with
the potential for widespread
dissemination. This program addresses
the ‘‘Healthy People 2010’’ focus area(s)
of Immunization and Infectious
Diseases.
Measurable outcomes of the program
will be in alignment with the
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:04 May 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
performance goal for the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC),
National Immunization Program (NIP) to
reduce the number of indigenous
vaccine-preventable diseases.
Research Objective:
• To develop, implement and
evaluate an intervention to increase
influenza vaccination of hospital-based
health care workers.
Activities: Awardee activities for this
program are as follows:
• Develop an intervention to increase
influenza vaccination rates among
health care workers in hospitals.
Important characteristics of the
intervention include sustainability and
degree to which the intervention could
be implemented widely with limited
resources. In addition, the intervention
developed should reflect current
knowledge about effectiveness of
interventions to increase vaccination,
specifically the importance of systems
and administrative changes.
• Identify a minimum of five
hospitals that will implement this
intervention. Hospitals included should
represent a mix of public and private
hospitals, and include at least two
hospitals with more than 300 beds.
• Develop a study design suitable for
evaluating the effectiveness of this
intervention. A control group of
hospitals should be included to ensure
that changes are not attributable to
secular trends.
• Identify key staff and established
resources/expertise available to develop,
implement and evaluate intervention.
• Implement intervention in the
selected hospitals. Collect information
on barriers to program implementation,
including healthcare worker attitudes.
• Evaluate the cost of the intervention
with distinction between fixed and
variable costs.
• Collaboratively disseminate
research findings in peer reviewed
publications and for use in determining
national policy.
In a cooperative agreement, CDC staff
is substantially involved in the program
activities, above and beyond routine
grant monitoring.
CDC Activities for this program are as
follows:
• Provide CDC investigator(s) to
monitor the cooperative agreement as
project officer(s).
• Participate as active project team
members in the development,
implementation and conduct of the
research project and as coauthors of all
scientific publications that result from
the project.
• Provide technical assistance on the
selection and evaluation of data
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
collection and data collection
instruments.
• Assist in the development of
research protocols for Institutional
Review Boards (IRB) review. The CDC
IRB will review and approve the project
protocol initially and on at least an
annual basis until the research project is
completed.
• Contribute subject matter expertise
in the areas of epidemiologic methods
and statistical analysis, and survey
research consultation.
• Participate in the analysis and
dissemination of information, data and
findings from the project, facilitating
dissemination of results.
• Serve as liaisons between the
recipients of the project award and other
administrative units within the CDC.
• Facilitate an annual meeting
between awardee and CDC to coordinate
planned efforts and review progress.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement. CDC involvement in this
program is listed in the Activities
Section above.
Mechanism of Support: U01.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2005.
Approximate Total Funding: $
150,000 (Includes direct and indirect
costs. This amount is an estimate, and
is subject to availability of funds.)
Approximate Number of Awards:
One.
Approximate Average Award:
$150,000 (Includes direct and indirect
costs. This amount is for the first 12month budget period.)
Floor of Award Range: None.
Ceiling of Award Range: $150,000
(Includes direct and indirect costs. This
ceiling is for the first 12-month budget
period.)
Anticipated Award Date: August 31,
2005.
Budget Period Length: 12 months.
Project Period Length: 2 years.
Throughout the project period, CDC’s
commitment to continuation of awards
will be conditioned on the availability
of funds, evidence of satisfactory
progress by the recipient (as
documented in required reports), and
the determination that continued
funding is in the best interest of the
Federal Government.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications are limited to public and
private nonprofit organizations and by
governments and their agencies, such
as: (For profit organizations are not
eligible under Section 317 (k)(1) [42
U.S.C. 247b(k)(1) of the Public Health
Service Act, as amended.)
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 91 / Thursday, May 12, 2005 / Notices
• Public nonprofit organizations
• Private nonprofit organizations
• Small, minority, women-owned
businesses
• Universities
• Colleges
• Research institutions
• Hospitals
• Community-based organizations
• Faith-based organizations
• Federally recognized Indian tribal
governments
• Indian tribes
• Indian tribal organizations
• State and local governments or their
Bona Fide Agents (this includes the
District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Marianna Islands,
American Samoa, Guam, the Federated
States of Micronesia, the Republic of the
Marshall Islands, and the Republic of
Palau)
• Political subdivisions of States (in
consultation with States)
A Bona Fide Agent is an agency/
organization identified by the state as
eligible to submit an application under
the state eligibility in lieu of a state
application. If you are applying as a
bona fide agent of a state or local
government, you must provide a letter
from the state or local government as
documentation of your status. Place this
documentation behind the first page of
your application form.
Individuals Eligible to Become
Principal Investigators: Any individual
with the skills, knowledge, and
resources necessary to carry out the
proposed research is invited to work
with their institution to develop an
application for support. Individuals
from underrepresented racial and ethnic
groups as well as individuals with
disabilities are always encouraged to
apply for CDC programs.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
IV.1. Address To Request Application
Package
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching
To apply for this funding opportunity,
use application form PHS 398 (OMB
number 0925–0001 rev. 9/2004). Forms
and instructions are available in an
interactive format on the CDC web site,
at the following Internet address:
https://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/
forminfo.htm.
Forms and instructions are also
available in an interactive format on the
National Institutes of Health (NIH) web
site at the following Internet address:
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/
phs398/phs398.html.
If you do not have access to the
Internet, or if you have difficulty
accessing the forms on-line, you may
contact the CDC Procurement and
Grants Office Technical Information
Management Section (PGO–TIM) staff
at: 770–488–2700. Application forms
can be mailed to you.
Matching funds are not required for
this program.
IV.2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
III.3. Other
Letter of Intent (LOI): Your LOI must
be written in the following format:
• Maximum number of pages: Two
• Font size: 12-point unreduced
• Double spaced
• Paper size: 8.5 by 11 inches
• Page margin size: One inch
• Printed only on one side of page
• Written in plain language, avoid
jargon
Your LOI must contain the following
information:
• Descriptive title of the proposed
research
• Name, address, E-mail address,
telephone number, and FAX number of
the Principal Investigator
• Names of other key personnel
• Participating institutions
• Number and title of this
Announcement
Application: Follow the PHS 398
application instructions for content and
formatting of your application. If the
instructions in this announcement differ
in any way from the PHS 398
instructions, follow the instructions in
If you request a funding amount
greater than the ceiling of the award
range, your application will be
considered non-responsive, and will not
be entered into the review process. You
will be notified that your application
did not meet the submission
requirements.
Special Requirements: If your
application is incomplete or nonresponsive to the requirements listed in
this section, it will not be entered into
the review process. You will be notified
that your application did not meet
submission requirements.
• Late applications will be considered
non-responsive. See section ‘‘IV.3.
Submission Dates and Times’’ for more
information on deadlines.
• Note: Title 2 of the United States
Code Section 1611 states that an
organization described in Section
501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code
that engages in lobbying activities is not
eligible to receive Federal funds
constituting an award, grant, or loan.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:04 May 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25073
this announcement. For further
assistance with the PHS 398 application
form, contact PGO–TIM staff at 770–
488–2700, or contact GrantsInfo,
Telephone (301) 435–0714, E-mail:
GrantsInfo@nih.gov.
Your research plan should address
activities to be conducted over the
entire project period.
You are required to have a Dun and
Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number to apply for a
grant or cooperative agreement from the
Federal government. Your DUNS
number must be entered on line 11 of
the face page of the PHS 398 application
form. The DUNS number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. For more information,
see the CDC Web site at: https://
www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/funding/
pubcommt1.htm.
This announcement uses the nonmodular budgeting format.
Additional requirements that may
require you to submit additional
documentation with your application
are listed in section ‘‘VI.2.
Administrative and National Policy
Requirements.’’
IV.3. Submission Dates and Times
LOI Deadline Date: June 13, 2005.
CDC requests that you send a LOI if
you intend to apply for this program.
Although the LOI is not required, not
binding, and does not enter into the
review of your subsequent application,
the LOI will be used to gauge the level
of interest in this program, and to allow
CDC to plan the application review.
Application Deadline Date: June 27,
2005.
Explanation of Deadlines: LOIs must
be received in the CDC Office of Public
Health Research (OPHR) and
applications must be received in the
CDC Procurement and Grants Office by
4 p.m. Eastern Time on the deadline
date. If you submit your LOI and
application by the United States Postal
Service or commercial delivery service,
you must ensure that the carrier will be
able to guarantee delivery by the closing
date and time. If CDC receives your
submission after closing due to: (1)
Carrier error, when the carrier accepted
the package with a guarantee for
delivery by the closing date and time, or
(2) significant weather delays or natural
disasters, you will be given the
opportunity to submit documentation of
the carriers guarantee. If the
documentation verifies a carrier
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
25074
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 91 / Thursday, May 12, 2005 / Notices
problem, CDC will consider the
submission as having been received by
the deadline.
This announcement is the definitive
guide on LOI and application content,
submission address, and deadline. It
supersedes information provided in the
application instructions. If your
application does not meet the deadline
above, it will not be eligible for review,
and will be discarded. You will be
notified that you did not meet the
submission requirements.
CDC will not notify you upon receipt
of your submission. If you have a
question about the receipt of your LOI
or application, first contact your courier.
If you still have a question concerning
your LOI, contact the OPHR staff at 404–
371–5277. If you still have a question
concerning your application, contact the
PGO–TIM staff at: 770–488–2700. Before
calling, please wait two to three days
after the submission deadline. This will
allow time for submissions to be
processed and logged.
IV.4. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications
Your application is subject to
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs, as governed by Executive
Order (EO) 12372. This order sets up a
system for state and local governmental
review of proposed federal assistance
applications. You should contact your
state single point of contact (SPOC) as
early as possible to alert the SPOC to
prospective applications, and to receive
instructions on your state’s process.
Click on the following link to get the
current SPOC list: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/
spoc.html.
IV.5. Funding Restrictions
Restrictions, which must be taken into
account while writing your budget, are
as follows:
• Funds relating to the conduct of
research will not be released until the
appropriate assurances and Institutional
Review Board approvals are in place.
• Reimbursement of pre-award costs
is not allowed.
If you are requesting indirect costs in
your budget, you must include a copy
of your indirect cost rate agreement. If
your indirect cost rate is a provisional
rate, the agreement should be less than
12 months of age.
IV.6. Other Submission Requirements
LOI Submission Address: Submit your
LOI by express mail, delivery service,
fax, or E-mail to: Mary Lerchen, DrPH,
Scientific Review Administrator, CDC/
Office of Public Health Research, One
West Court Square, Suite 7000, MS D–
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:04 May 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
72, Telephone: 404–371–5277, Fax:
404–371–5215, E-mail:
MLerchen@cdc.gov.
Application Submission Address:
Submit the original and one hard copy
of your application by mail or express
delivery service to: Technical
Information Management—RFA IP05–
089, CDC Procurement and Grants
Office, 2920 Brandywine Road, Atlanta,
GA 30341.
At the time of submission, four
additional copies of the application, and
all appendices must be sent to: Mary
Lerchen, DrPH, Scientific Review
Administrator, CDC/Office of Public
Health Research, One West Court
Square, Suite 7000, MS D–72,
Telephone: 404–371–5277, Fax: 404–
371–5215, E-mail: MLerchen@cdc.gov.
Applications may not be submitted
electronically at this time.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Criteria
Applicants are required to provide
measures of effectiveness that will
demonstrate the accomplishment of the
various identified objectives of the
cooperative agreement. Measures of
effectiveness must relate to the
performance goals stated in the
‘‘Purpose’’ section of this
announcement. Measures must be
objective and quantitative, and must
measure the intended outcome. These
measures of effectiveness must be
submitted with the application and will
be an element of evaluation.
The goals of CDC-supported research
are to advance the understanding of
biological systems, improve the control
and prevention of disease and injury,
and enhance health. In the written
comments, reviewers will be asked to
evaluate the application in order to
judge the likelihood that the proposed
research will have a substantial impact
on the pursuit of these goals.
The scientific review group will
address and consider each of the
following criteria equally in assigning
the application’s overall score,
weighting them as appropriate for each
application. The application does not
need to be strong in all categories to be
judged likely to have major scientific
impact and thus deserve a high priority
score. For example, an investigator may
propose to carry out important work
that by its nature is not innovative, but
is essential to move a field forward.
The review criteria are as follows:
Significance: Does this study address
an important problem? If the aims of the
application are achieved, how will
scientific knowledge be advanced? What
will be the effect of these studies on the
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
concepts or methods that drive this
field?
Approach: Are the conceptual
framework, design, methods, and
analyses adequately developed, wellintegrated, and appropriate to the aims
of the project? Does the applicant
acknowledge potential problem areas
and consider alternative tactics?
Innovation: Does the project employ
novel concepts, approaches or methods?
Are the aims original and innovative?
Does the project challenge existing
paradigms or develop new
methodologies or technologies?
Investigator: Is the investigator
appropriately trained and well suited to
carry out this work? Is the work
proposed appropriate to the experience
level of the principal investigator and
other researchers (if any)?
Environment: Does the scientific
environment in which the work will be
done contribute to the probability of
success? Do the proposed experiments
take advantage of unique features of the
scientific environment or employ useful
collaborative arrangements? Is there
evidence of institutional support? Are
letters of support included, if
appropriate?
Additional Review Criteria: In
addition to the above criteria, the
following items will be considered in
the determination of scientific merit and
priority score:
Preference will be given to applicants
with a demonstrated relationship with
targeted hospitals as evidenced by
letters of support and/or previous
demonstrated successful collaboration.
Documentation should be placed in an
appendix.
Protection of Human Subjects from
Research Risks: Does the application
adequately address the requirements of
Title 45 Part 46 for the protection of
human subjects? The involvement of
human subjects and protections from
research risk relating to their
participation in the proposed research
will be assessed.
Inclusion of Women and Minorities in
Research: Does the application
adequately address the CDC Policy
requirements regarding the inclusion of
women, ethnic, and racial groups in the
proposed research? This includes: (1)
The proposed plan for the inclusion of
both sexes and racial and ethnic
minority populations for appropriate
representation; (2) The proposed
justification when representation is
limited or absent; (3) A statement as to
whether the design of the study is
adequate to measure differences when
warranted; and (4) A statement as to
whether the plans for recruitment and
outreach for study participants include
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 91 / Thursday, May 12, 2005 / Notices
the process of establishing partnerships
with community(ies) and recognition of
mutual benefits.
Budget: The reasonableness of the
proposed budget and the requested
period of support in relation to the
proposed research. The priority score
should not be affected by the evaluation
of the budget.
V.2. Review and Selection Process
Applications will be reviewed for
completeness by the Procurement and
Grants Office (PGO) and the OPHR for
responsiveness. Incomplete applications
and applications that are nonresponsive to the eligibility criteria will
not advance through the review process.
Applicants will be notified that their
application did not meet submission
requirements.
Applications that are complete and
responsive to the announcement will be
evaluated for scientific and technical
merit by an appropriate peer review
group or charter study section convened
by the OPHR in accordance with the
review criteria listed above. As part of
the initial merit review, all applications
will:
• Undergo a process in which only
those applications deemed to have the
highest scientific merit by the review
group, generally the top half of the
applications under review, will be
discussed and assigned a priority score.
• Receive a written critique.
• Receive a second programmatic
level review by the Office of Science,
National Immunization Program.
• Undergo a peer review by a Special
Emphasis Panel. The SEP will be
selected from the NIH pool of scientists
or recommendations from the National
Immunization Program to serve as
reviewers on SEPs. Applications will be
ranked for the secondary review
according to scores submitted by the
SEP. Only those applications deemed to
have the highest scientific merit by the
review group, generally the top half of
the applications under review, will be
discussed and assigned a priority score.
Award Criteria: Criteria that will be
used to make award decisions during
the programmatic review include:
• Scientific merit (as determined by
peer review)
• Availability of funds
• Programmatic priorities
V.3. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
Award Date: August 31, 2005.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1. Award Notices
Successful applicants will receive a
Notice of Award (NoA) from the CDC
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:04 May 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
Procurement and Grants Office. The
NoA shall be the only binding,
authorizing document between the
recipient and CDC. The NoA will be
signed by an authorized Grants
Management Officer, and mailed to the
recipient fiscal officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review by mail from the
Scientific Review Administrator, NIP.
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
45 CFR Part 74 and Part 92
For more information on the Code of
Federal Regulations, see the National
Archives and Records Administration at
the following Internet address: https://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-tablesearch.html.
The following additional
requirements apply to this project:
• AR–1 Human Subjects
Requirements
• AR–2 Requirements for Inclusion
of Women and Racial and Ethnic
Minorities in Research
• AR–7 Executive Order 12372
• AR–9 Paperwork Reduction Act
• AR–10 Smoke-Free Workplace
Requirements
• AR–11 Healthy People 2010
• AR–12 Lobbying Restrictions
• AR–15 Proof of Non-Profit Status
• AR–22 Research Integrity
• AR–24 Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act
Requirements
• AR–25 Release and Sharing of
Data
Additional information on these
requirements can be found on the CDC
web site at the following Internet
address: https://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/
funding/ARs.htm.
VI.3. Reporting
You must provide CDC with an
original, plus two hard copies of the
following reports:
1. Interim progress report, (use form
PHS 2590, OMB Number 0925–0001,
rev. 9/2004 as posted on the CDC Web
site) no less than 90 days before the end
of the budget period. The progress
report will serve as your non-competing
continuation application, and must
contain the following additional
elements:
a. Progress Toward Measures of
Effectiveness.
b. Additional Information Requested
by Program.
2. Financial status report, no more
than 90 days after the end of the budget
period.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25075
3. Final financial and performance
reports, no more than 90 days after the
end of the project period.
These reports must be mailed to the
Grants Management Specialist listed in
the ‘‘Agency Contacts’’ section of this
announcement.
VII. Agency Contacts
We encourage inquiries concerning
this announcement.
For general questions, contact:
Technical Information Management
Section, CDC Procurement and Grants
Office, 2920 Brandywine Road, Atlanta,
GA 30341, Telephone: 770–488–2700.
For scientific/research issues, contact:
Susan Chu, PhD, MSPH, Extramural
Program Official, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton
Road NE, National Immunization
Program, MS E–05, Atlanta, GA 30333,
Telephone: 404 639–8727, E-mail:
SChu@cdc.gov.
For questions about peer review,
contact: Mary Lerchen, DrPH, Scientific
Review Administrator, CDC/Office of
Public Health Research, One West Court
Square, Suite 7000, MS D–72,
Telephone: 404–371–5277, Fax: 404–
371–5215, E-mail: MLerchen@cdc.gov.
For financial, grants management, or
budget assistance, contact: Sharron
Orum, Grants Management Specialist,
CDC Procurement and Grants Office,
2920 Brandywine Road, Atlanta, GA
30341, Telephone: 770–488–2716, Email: SPO2@cdc.gov.
VIII. Other Information
This and other CDC funding
opportunity announcements can be
found on the CDC Web site, Internet
address: https://www.cdc.gov. Click on
‘‘Funding’’ then ‘‘Grants and
Cooperative Agreements.’’
Dated: May 6, 2005.
William P. Nichols,
Director, Procurement and Grants Office,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 05–9455 Filed 5–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Improving Vaccination Coverage in the
Greater Than 65 Years of Age
Population
Announcement Type: New.
Funding Opportunity Number: RFA
IP05–091.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 93.185.
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 91 (Thursday, May 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25072-25075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-9455]
[[Page 25072]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Influenza Vaccination of Healthcare Workers in Hospitals
Announcement Type: New.
Funding Opportunity Number: RFA IP05-089.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 93.185.
Letter of Intent Deadline: June 13, 2005.
Application Deadline: June 27, 2005.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Section 311 [42 U.S.C. 243] and 317 (k)(1) [42 U.S.C.
247b (k)(1)] of the Public Health Service Act, as amended.
Background: Healthcare workers have been included in the Annual
Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices recommendations for over
20 years. Influenza vaccination coverage remains low, under 40 percent
in the 2002 National Health Interview Survey. The rationale for
including healthcare workers has been that healthcare workers can serve
as vectors of influenza virus. Another rationale for promoting
vaccination of healthcare workers is that health care workers who
themselves are vaccinated may be better advocates of influenza
vaccination. Multifaceted approaches which include several components,
such as convenience of vaccination (e.g. mobile carts, peer
vaccination), free vaccine, education, and outreach appear to be the
most effective (1-3).
1. Habib S, Rishpon S, Rubin L. ``Influenza vaccination among
healthcare workers''. ``Isr Med Assoc J. 2000''; 2:899-901.
2. Nichol KL, Hauge M. ``Influenza vaccination of healthcare
workers''. ``Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997''; 18(3):189-194.
3. Bryant KA, Stover B, Cain L, Siegel J, Jarvis W. ``Improving
influenza immunization rates among healthcare workers caring for high
risk pediatric patients''. ``Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol'' (in press)
Purpose: The purpose of the program is to fund research to identify
effective, feasible, and sustainable methods to increase influenza
vaccination of health care workers in hospital settings, with the
potential for widespread dissemination. This program addresses the
``Healthy People 2010'' focus area(s) of Immunization and Infectious
Diseases.
Measurable outcomes of the program will be in alignment with the
performance goal for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's
(CDC), National Immunization Program (NIP) to reduce the number of
indigenous vaccine-preventable diseases.
Research Objective:
To develop, implement and evaluate an intervention to
increase influenza vaccination of hospital-based health care workers.
Activities: Awardee activities for this program are as follows:
Develop an intervention to increase influenza vaccination
rates among health care workers in hospitals. Important characteristics
of the intervention include sustainability and degree to which the
intervention could be implemented widely with limited resources. In
addition, the intervention developed should reflect current knowledge
about effectiveness of interventions to increase vaccination,
specifically the importance of systems and administrative changes.
Identify a minimum of five hospitals that will implement
this intervention. Hospitals included should represent a mix of public
and private hospitals, and include at least two hospitals with more
than 300 beds.
Develop a study design suitable for evaluating the
effectiveness of this intervention. A control group of hospitals should
be included to ensure that changes are not attributable to secular
trends.
Identify key staff and established resources/expertise
available to develop, implement and evaluate intervention.
Implement intervention in the selected hospitals. Collect
information on barriers to program implementation, including healthcare
worker attitudes.
Evaluate the cost of the intervention with distinction
between fixed and variable costs.
Collaboratively disseminate research findings in peer
reviewed publications and for use in determining national policy.
In a cooperative agreement, CDC staff is substantially involved in
the program activities, above and beyond routine grant monitoring.
CDC Activities for this program are as follows:
Provide CDC investigator(s) to monitor the cooperative
agreement as project officer(s).
Participate as active project team members in the
development, implementation and conduct of the research project and as
coauthors of all scientific publications that result from the project.
Provide technical assistance on the selection and
evaluation of data collection and data collection instruments.
Assist in the development of research protocols for
Institutional Review Boards (IRB) review. The CDC IRB will review and
approve the project protocol initially and on at least an annual basis
until the research project is completed.
Contribute subject matter expertise in the areas of
epidemiologic methods and statistical analysis, and survey research
consultation.
Participate in the analysis and dissemination of
information, data and findings from the project, facilitating
dissemination of results.
Serve as liaisons between the recipients of the project
award and other administrative units within the CDC.
Facilitate an annual meeting between awardee and CDC to
coordinate planned efforts and review progress.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. CDC involvement in this
program is listed in the Activities Section above.
Mechanism of Support: U01.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2005.
Approximate Total Funding: $ 150,000 (Includes direct and indirect
costs. This amount is an estimate, and is subject to availability of
funds.)
Approximate Number of Awards: One.
Approximate Average Award: $150,000 (Includes direct and indirect
costs. This amount is for the first 12-month budget period.)
Floor of Award Range: None.
Ceiling of Award Range: $150,000 (Includes direct and indirect
costs. This ceiling is for the first 12-month budget period.)
Anticipated Award Date: August 31, 2005.
Budget Period Length: 12 months.
Project Period Length: 2 years.
Throughout the project period, CDC's commitment to continuation of
awards will be conditioned on the availability of funds, evidence of
satisfactory progress by the recipient (as documented in required
reports), and the determination that continued funding is in the best
interest of the Federal Government.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications are limited to public and private nonprofit
organizations and by governments and their agencies, such as: (For
profit organizations are not eligible under Section 317 (k)(1) [42
U.S.C. 247b(k)(1) of the Public Health Service Act, as amended.)
[[Page 25073]]
Public nonprofit organizations
Private nonprofit organizations
Small, minority, women-owned businesses
Universities
Colleges
Research institutions
Hospitals
Community-based organizations
Faith-based organizations
Federally recognized Indian tribal governments
Indian tribes
Indian tribal organizations
State and local governments or their Bona Fide Agents
(this includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianna
Islands, American Samoa, Guam, the Federated States of Micronesia, the
Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau)
Political subdivisions of States (in consultation with
States)
A Bona Fide Agent is an agency/organization identified by the state
as eligible to submit an application under the state eligibility in
lieu of a state application. If you are applying as a bona fide agent
of a state or local government, you must provide a letter from the
state or local government as documentation of your status. Place this
documentation behind the first page of your application form.
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching
Matching funds are not required for this program.
III.3. Other
If you request a funding amount greater than the ceiling of the
award range, your application will be considered non-responsive, and
will not be entered into the review process. You will be notified that
your application did not meet the submission requirements.
Special Requirements: If your application is incomplete or non-
responsive to the requirements listed in this section, it will not be
entered into the review process. You will be notified that your
application did not meet submission requirements.
Late applications will be considered non-responsive. See
section ``IV.3. Submission Dates and Times'' for more information on
deadlines.
Note: Title 2 of the United States Code Section 1611
states that an organization described in Section 501(c)(4) of the
Internal Revenue Code that engages in lobbying activities is not
eligible to receive Federal funds constituting an award, grant, or
loan.
Individuals Eligible to Become Principal Investigators: Any
individual with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry
out the proposed research is invited to work with their institution to
develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented
racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are
always encouraged to apply for CDC programs.
IV. Application and Submission Information
IV.1. Address To Request Application Package
To apply for this funding opportunity, use application form PHS 398
(OMB number 0925-0001 rev. 9/2004). Forms and instructions are
available in an interactive format on the CDC web site, at the
following Internet address: https://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/forminfo.htm.
Forms and instructions are also available in an interactive format
on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) web site at the following
Internet address: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/
phs398.html.
If you do not have access to the Internet, or if you have
difficulty accessing the forms on-line, you may contact the CDC
Procurement and Grants Office Technical Information Management Section
(PGO-TIM) staff at: 770-488-2700. Application forms can be mailed to
you.
IV.2. Content and Form of Application Submission
Letter of Intent (LOI): Your LOI must be written in the following
format:
Maximum number of pages: Two
Font size: 12-point unreduced
Double spaced
Paper size: 8.5 by 11 inches
Page margin size: One inch
Printed only on one side of page
Written in plain language, avoid jargon
Your LOI must contain the following information:
Descriptive title of the proposed research
Name, address, E-mail address, telephone number, and FAX
number of the Principal Investigator
Names of other key personnel
Participating institutions
Number and title of this Announcement
Application: Follow the PHS 398 application instructions for
content and formatting of your application. If the instructions in this
announcement differ in any way from the PHS 398 instructions, follow
the instructions in this announcement. For further assistance with the
PHS 398 application form, contact PGO-TIM staff at 770-488-2700, or
contact GrantsInfo, Telephone (301) 435-0714, E-mail:
GrantsInfo@nih.gov.
Your research plan should address activities to be conducted over
the entire project period.
You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the Federal government. Your DUNS number must be entered
on line 11 of the face page of the PHS 398 application form. The DUNS
number is a nine-digit identification number, which uniquely identifies
business entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com
or call 1-866-705-5711. For more information, see the CDC Web site at:
https://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/funding/pubcommt1.htm.
This announcement uses the non-modular budgeting format.
Additional requirements that may require you to submit additional
documentation with your application are listed in section ``VI.2.
Administrative and National Policy Requirements.''
IV.3. Submission Dates and Times
LOI Deadline Date: June 13, 2005.
CDC requests that you send a LOI if you intend to apply for this
program. Although the LOI is not required, not binding, and does not
enter into the review of your subsequent application, the LOI will be
used to gauge the level of interest in this program, and to allow CDC
to plan the application review.
Application Deadline Date: June 27, 2005.
Explanation of Deadlines: LOIs must be received in the CDC Office
of Public Health Research (OPHR) and applications must be received in
the CDC Procurement and Grants Office by 4 p.m. Eastern Time on the
deadline date. If you submit your LOI and application by the United
States Postal Service or commercial delivery service, you must ensure
that the carrier will be able to guarantee delivery by the closing date
and time. If CDC receives your submission after closing due to: (1)
Carrier error, when the carrier accepted the package with a guarantee
for delivery by the closing date and time, or (2) significant weather
delays or natural disasters, you will be given the opportunity to
submit documentation of the carriers guarantee. If the documentation
verifies a carrier
[[Page 25074]]
problem, CDC will consider the submission as having been received by
the deadline.
This announcement is the definitive guide on LOI and application
content, submission address, and deadline. It supersedes information
provided in the application instructions. If your application does not
meet the deadline above, it will not be eligible for review, and will
be discarded. You will be notified that you did not meet the submission
requirements.
CDC will not notify you upon receipt of your submission. If you
have a question about the receipt of your LOI or application, first
contact your courier. If you still have a question concerning your LOI,
contact the OPHR staff at 404-371-5277. If you still have a question
concerning your application, contact the PGO-TIM staff at: 770-488-
2700. Before calling, please wait two to three days after the
submission deadline. This will allow time for submissions to be
processed and logged.
IV.4. Intergovernmental Review of Applications
Your application is subject to Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs, as governed by Executive Order (EO) 12372. This order sets up
a system for state and local governmental review of proposed federal
assistance applications. You should contact your state single point of
contact (SPOC) as early as possible to alert the SPOC to prospective
applications, and to receive instructions on your state's process.
Click on the following link to get the current SPOC list: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/spoc.html.
IV.5. Funding Restrictions
Restrictions, which must be taken into account while writing your
budget, are as follows:
Funds relating to the conduct of research will not be
released until the appropriate assurances and Institutional Review
Board approvals are in place.
Reimbursement of pre-award costs is not allowed.
If you are requesting indirect costs in your budget, you must
include a copy of your indirect cost rate agreement. If your indirect
cost rate is a provisional rate, the agreement should be less than 12
months of age.
IV.6. Other Submission Requirements
LOI Submission Address: Submit your LOI by express mail, delivery
service, fax, or E-mail to: Mary Lerchen, DrPH, Scientific Review
Administrator, CDC/Office of Public Health Research, One West Court
Square, Suite 7000, MS D-72, Telephone: 404-371-5277, Fax: 404-371-
5215, E-mail: MLerchen@cdc.gov.
Application Submission Address: Submit the original and one hard
copy of your application by mail or express delivery service to:
Technical Information Management--RFA IP05-089, CDC Procurement and
Grants Office, 2920 Brandywine Road, Atlanta, GA 30341.
At the time of submission, four additional copies of the
application, and all appendices must be sent to: Mary Lerchen, DrPH,
Scientific Review Administrator, CDC/Office of Public Health Research,
One West Court Square, Suite 7000, MS D-72, Telephone: 404-371-5277,
Fax: 404-371-5215, E-mail: MLerchen@cdc.gov.
Applications may not be submitted electronically at this time.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Criteria
Applicants are required to provide measures of effectiveness that
will demonstrate the accomplishment of the various identified
objectives of the cooperative agreement. Measures of effectiveness must
relate to the performance goals stated in the ``Purpose'' section of
this announcement. Measures must be objective and quantitative, and
must measure the intended outcome. These measures of effectiveness must
be submitted with the application and will be an element of evaluation.
The goals of CDC-supported research are to advance the
understanding of biological systems, improve the control and prevention
of disease and injury, and enhance health. In the written comments,
reviewers will be asked to evaluate the application in order to judge
the likelihood that the proposed research will have a substantial
impact on the pursuit of these goals.
The scientific review group will address and consider each of the
following criteria equally in assigning the application's overall
score, weighting them as appropriate for each application. The
application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged
likely to have major scientific impact and thus deserve a high priority
score. For example, an investigator may propose to carry out important
work that by its nature is not innovative, but is essential to move a
field forward.
The review criteria are as follows:
Significance: Does this study address an important problem? If the
aims of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be
advanced? What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or
methods that drive this field?
Approach: Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and
analyses adequately developed, well-integrated, and appropriate to the
aims of the project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem
areas and consider alternative tactics?
Innovation: Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or
methods? Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project
challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or
technologies?
Investigator: Is the investigator appropriately trained and well
suited to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the
experience level of the principal investigator and other researchers
(if any)?
Environment: Does the scientific environment in which the work will
be done contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed
experiments take advantage of unique features of the scientific
environment or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is there
evidence of institutional support? Are letters of support included, if
appropriate?
Additional Review Criteria: In addition to the above criteria, the
following items will be considered in the determination of scientific
merit and priority score:
Preference will be given to applicants with a demonstrated
relationship with targeted hospitals as evidenced by letters of support
and/or previous demonstrated successful collaboration. Documentation
should be placed in an appendix.
Protection of Human Subjects from Research Risks: Does the
application adequately address the requirements of Title 45 Part 46 for
the protection of human subjects? The involvement of human subjects and
protections from research risk relating to their participation in the
proposed research will be assessed.
Inclusion of Women and Minorities in Research: Does the application
adequately address the CDC Policy requirements regarding the inclusion
of women, ethnic, and racial groups in the proposed research? This
includes: (1) The proposed plan for the inclusion of both sexes and
racial and ethnic minority populations for appropriate representation;
(2) The proposed justification when representation is limited or
absent; (3) A statement as to whether the design of the study is
adequate to measure differences when warranted; and (4) A statement as
to whether the plans for recruitment and outreach for study
participants include
[[Page 25075]]
the process of establishing partnerships with community(ies) and
recognition of mutual benefits.
Budget: The reasonableness of the proposed budget and the requested
period of support in relation to the proposed research. The priority
score should not be affected by the evaluation of the budget.
V.2. Review and Selection Process
Applications will be reviewed for completeness by the Procurement
and Grants Office (PGO) and the OPHR for responsiveness. Incomplete
applications and applications that are non-responsive to the
eligibility criteria will not advance through the review process.
Applicants will be notified that their application did not meet
submission requirements.
Applications that are complete and responsive to the announcement
will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate
peer review group or charter study section convened by the OPHR in
accordance with the review criteria listed above. As part of the
initial merit review, all applications will:
Undergo a process in which only those applications deemed
to have the highest scientific merit by the review group, generally the
top half of the applications under review, will be discussed and
assigned a priority score.
Receive a written critique.
Receive a second programmatic level review by the Office
of Science, National Immunization Program.
Undergo a peer review by a Special Emphasis Panel. The SEP
will be selected from the NIH pool of scientists or recommendations
from the National Immunization Program to serve as reviewers on SEPs.
Applications will be ranked for the secondary review according to
scores submitted by the SEP. Only those applications deemed to have the
highest scientific merit by the review group, generally the top half of
the applications under review, will be discussed and assigned a
priority score.
Award Criteria: Criteria that will be used to make award decisions
during the programmatic review include:
Scientific merit (as determined by peer review)
Availability of funds
Programmatic priorities
V.3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates
Award Date: August 31, 2005.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1. Award Notices
Successful applicants will receive a Notice of Award (NoA) from the
CDC Procurement and Grants Office. The NoA shall be the only binding,
authorizing document between the recipient and CDC. The NoA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Management Officer, and mailed to the
recipient fiscal officer identified in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review by mail from the Scientific Review
Administrator, NIP.
VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
45 CFR Part 74 and Part 92
For more information on the Code of Federal Regulations, see the
National Archives and Records Administration at the following Internet
address: https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-table-search.html.
The following additional requirements apply to this project:
AR-1 Human Subjects Requirements
AR-2 Requirements for Inclusion of Women and Racial and
Ethnic Minorities in Research
AR-7 Executive Order 12372
AR-9 Paperwork Reduction Act
AR-10 Smoke-Free Workplace Requirements
AR-11 Healthy People 2010
AR-12 Lobbying Restrictions
AR-15 Proof of Non-Profit Status
AR-22 Research Integrity
AR-24 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Requirements
AR-25 Release and Sharing of Data
Additional information on these requirements can be found on the
CDC web site at the following Internet address: https://www.cdc.gov/od/
pgo/funding/ARs.htm.
VI.3. Reporting
You must provide CDC with an original, plus two hard copies of the
following reports:
1. Interim progress report, (use form PHS 2590, OMB Number 0925-
0001, rev. 9/2004 as posted on the CDC Web site) no less than 90 days
before the end of the budget period. The progress report will serve as
your non-competing continuation application, and must contain the
following additional elements:
a. Progress Toward Measures of Effectiveness.
b. Additional Information Requested by Program.
2. Financial status report, no more than 90 days after the end of
the budget period.
3. Final financial and performance reports, no more than 90 days
after the end of the project period.
These reports must be mailed to the Grants Management Specialist
listed in the ``Agency Contacts'' section of this announcement.
VII. Agency Contacts
We encourage inquiries concerning this announcement.
For general questions, contact: Technical Information Management
Section, CDC Procurement and Grants Office, 2920 Brandywine Road,
Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: 770-488-2700.
For scientific/research issues, contact: Susan Chu, PhD, MSPH,
Extramural Program Official, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, National Immunization Program, MS E-
05, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: 404 639-8727, E-mail: SChu@cdc.gov.
For questions about peer review, contact: Mary Lerchen, DrPH,
Scientific Review Administrator, CDC/Office of Public Health Research,
One West Court Square, Suite 7000, MS D-72, Telephone: 404-371-5277,
Fax: 404-371-5215, E-mail: MLerchen@cdc.gov.
For financial, grants management, or budget assistance, contact:
Sharron Orum, Grants Management Specialist, CDC Procurement and Grants
Office, 2920 Brandywine Road, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: 770-488-
2716, E-mail: SPO2@cdc.gov.
VIII. Other Information
This and other CDC funding opportunity announcements can be found
on the CDC Web site, Internet address: https://www.cdc.gov. Click on
``Funding'' then ``Grants and Cooperative Agreements.''
Dated: May 6, 2005.
William P. Nichols,
Director, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 05-9455 Filed 5-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P