Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; State of Washington; Spokane Carbon Monoxide Attainment Plan, 24991-24992 [05-9400]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 91 / Thursday, May 12, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart VV—Virginia
I 3. In §52.2420, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding the entry for
Name of non-regulatory SIP
revision
*
the Non-Regulatory Voluntary Emission § 52.2420 Identification of plan.
Reduction Program at the end of the table *
*
*
*
*
to read as follows:
State submittal date
Applicable geographic area
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
EPA approval date
*
Non-Regulatory Voluntary
Washington, DC severe 1Emission Reduction Program.
hour ozone nonattainment
area.
[FR Doc. 05–9315 Filed 5–11–05; 8:45 am]
*
0110; e-mail address:
robinson.connie@epa.gov.
G. The conformity budget under
section 176(c)(2)(A) of the Act and
§ 93.118 of the transportation
conformity rule (40 CFR part 93, subpart
A),
H. Administrative Order No. DE
01AQIS–3285 and Order No. DE
01AQIS–3285, Amendment #1 relating
to Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical
Corporation, Mead Works.
We are also approving a SIP revision
submitted on September 26, 2001, to
two sections of Washington
Administrative Code (WAC) 173–422,
Motor Vehicle Emission Inspection, to
provide an inspection schedule for
motor vehicles between 5 and 25 years
old.
A Technical Support Document on
file at the EPA Region 10 office contains
a detailed analysis and rationale in
support of the Spokane Serious Area
Carbon Monoxide Plan and the WAC
revisions.
40 CFR Part 52
[WA–01–003; FRL–7906–3]
I. Background Information
On March 8, 2005, EPA published in
the Federal Register, a proposal to
approve the Spokane, Washington CO
serious Attainment Plan, revisions to
the Washington State Inspection and
Maintenance (I/M) Program, and certain
source-specific SIP revisions relating to
Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical
Corporation. See 70 FR 11179.
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EPA is approving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted to EPA by the State of
Washington that consist of A Plan for
Attaining Carbon Monoxide (CO)
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) in the Spokane Serious CO
Nonattainment Area and changes to the
Washington State Inspection and
Maintenance Program.
The EPA is also approving certain
source-specific SIP revisions relating to
Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical
Corporation of Spokane.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
June 13, 2005.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket I.D.
No. WA–01–003. Publicly available
docket materials are available in hard
copy at the Office of Air, Waste, and
Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Sixth Ave., Seattle,
Washington 98101. This Docket Facility
is open from 8:30 a.m.–4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket telephone number
is (206) 553–4273.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Connie Robinson, Office of Air, Waste
and Toxics (OAWT–107), EPA Region
10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle,
Washington 98101; telephone number:
(206) 553–1086; fax number: 206–553–
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:33 May 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
*
5/12/05 [Insert page number
The nonregulatory measures
where the document begins].
found in section 7.6 and Appendix J of the plan.
Throughout this document, wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA. Information is organized as
follows:
Approval and Promulgation of State
Implementation Plans; State of
Washington; Spokane Carbon
Monoxide Attainment Plan
*
Additional explanation
2/25/2004
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
24991
II. Public Comments on the Proposed
Action
EPA provided a 30-day review and
comment period and solicited
comments on our proposal published in
the March 8, 2005, Federal Register. No
comments were received on the
proposed rulemaking. EPA is now
taking final action on the SIP revisions
consistent with the published proposal.
III. Final Action
In this action, the EPA is approving
revisions to the Washington State
Implementation Plan. Specifically, we
are approving the following elements of
the Spokane CO Attainment Plan,
submitted on September 20, 2001 and
November 22, 2004:
A. Procedural requirements, under
section 110(a)(2) of the Act;
B. Base year emission inventory,
under sections 172(c)(3) and 187(a)(1)
and periodic inventories under 187(a)(5)
of the Act;
C. Attainment demonstration, under
section 187(a)(7) of the Act;
D. The TCM program under
187(b)(2)182(d)(1) and 108(f)(1)(A) of
the Act;
E. VMT forecasts under section
187(a)(2)(A) of the Act;
F. Contingency measures under
section 187(a)(3) of the Act;
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
State law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
State law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under State law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by State law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
24992
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 91 / Thursday, May 12, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a State rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:22 May 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by July 11, 2005.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental regulations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: April 20, 2005.
Ronald A. Kreizenbeck,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
(A) Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical
Corporation Administrative Order No.
DE 01AQIS–3285 dated October 24,
2001, and Kaiser Aluminum and
Chemical Corporation Administrative
Order No. DE 01AQIS–3285,
Amendment #1 dated April 9, 2003.
(B) Washington Administrative Code
173–422–031, ‘‘Vehicle emission
inspection schedules,’’ and Washington
Administrative Code 173–422–170,
‘‘Exemptions,’’ as effective 12/2/2000.
(ii) Additional material.
A Plan for Attaining Carbon
Monoxide National Ambient Air Quality
Standards in the Spokane Serious
Nonattainment Area, adopted
September 19, 2001, and November 17,
2004.
I 3. Paragraph (a) (2) of § 52.2475 is
revised to read as follows:
§ 52.2475
Approval of plans.
(a) * * *
(2) Spokane.
(i) EPA approves as a revision to the
Washington State Implementation Plan,
A Plan for Attaining Carbon Monoxide
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
in the Spokane Serious Nonattainment
Area submitted by the Washington
Department of Ecology on September
20, 2001 and November 22, 2004.
(ii) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
[FR Doc. 05–9400 Filed 5–11–05; 8:45 am]
PART 52—[AMENDED]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
I
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart WW—Washington
2. Section 52.2470 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(87) to read as
follows:
I
§ 52.2470
Identification of plan
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(87) On September 20, 2001, and
November 22, 2004, the Washington
State Department of Ecology submitted
revisions to the Washington State
Implementation Plan consisting of A
Plan for Attaining Carbon Monoxide
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
in the Spokane Serious Nonattainment
Area. On September 26, 2001, the
Washington State Department of
Ecology submitted minor revisions to
the Washington State Inspection and
Maintenance Program.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 041126332–5039–02; I.D.
050605D]
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Alaska Plaice in the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Prohibition of retention.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS is prohibiting retention
of Alaska plaice in the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands management area
(BSAI). NMFS is requiring that catch of
Alaska plaice in this area be treated in
the same manner as prohibited species
and discarded at sea with a minimum of
injury. This action is necessary because
the 2005 total allowable catch (TAC) of
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 91 (Thursday, May 12, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24991-24992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-9400]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[WA-01-003; FRL-7906-3]
Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; State of
Washington; Spokane Carbon Monoxide Attainment Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is approving State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted to EPA by the State of Washington that consist of A Plan for
Attaining Carbon Monoxide (CO) National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) in the Spokane Serious CO Nonattainment Area and changes to the
Washington State Inspection and Maintenance Program.
The EPA is also approving certain source-specific SIP revisions
relating to Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation of Spokane.
DATES: This final rule is effective on June 13, 2005.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
I.D. No. WA-01-003. Publicly available docket materials are available
in hard copy at the Office of Air, Waste, and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Sixth Ave., Seattle, Washington 98101. This
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.-4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket telephone number is (206) 553-
4273.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Connie Robinson, Office of Air, Waste
and Toxics (OAWT-107), EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle,
Washington 98101; telephone number: (206) 553-1086; fax number: 206-
553-0110; e-mail address: robinson.connie@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA. Information is organized
as follows:
I. Background Information
On March 8, 2005, EPA published in the Federal Register, a proposal
to approve the Spokane, Washington CO serious Attainment Plan,
revisions to the Washington State Inspection and Maintenance (I/M)
Program, and certain source-specific SIP revisions relating to Kaiser
Aluminum and Chemical Corporation. See 70 FR 11179.
II. Public Comments on the Proposed Action
EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period and solicited
comments on our proposal published in the March 8, 2005, Federal
Register. No comments were received on the proposed rulemaking. EPA is
now taking final action on the SIP revisions consistent with the
published proposal.
III. Final Action
In this action, the EPA is approving revisions to the Washington
State Implementation Plan. Specifically, we are approving the following
elements of the Spokane CO Attainment Plan, submitted on September 20,
2001 and November 22, 2004:
A. Procedural requirements, under section 110(a)(2) of the Act;
B. Base year emission inventory, under sections 172(c)(3) and
187(a)(1) and periodic inventories under 187(a)(5) of the Act;
C. Attainment demonstration, under section 187(a)(7) of the Act;
D. The TCM program under 187(b)(2)182(d)(1) and 108(f)(1)(A) of the
Act;
E. VMT forecasts under section 187(a)(2)(A) of the Act;
F. Contingency measures under section 187(a)(3) of the Act;
G. The conformity budget under section 176(c)(2)(A) of the Act and
Sec. 93.118 of the transportation conformity rule (40 CFR part 93,
subpart A),
H. Administrative Order No. DE 01AQIS-3285 and Order No. DE 01AQIS-
3285, Amendment 1 relating to Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical
Corporation, Mead Works.
We are also approving a SIP revision submitted on September 26,
2001, to two sections of Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-422,
Motor Vehicle Emission Inspection, to provide an inspection schedule
for motor vehicles between 5 and 25 years old.
A Technical Support Document on file at the EPA Region 10 office
contains a detailed analysis and rationale in support of the Spokane
Serious Area Carbon Monoxide Plan and the WAC revisions.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under State law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small
[[Page 24992]]
governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a State rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 11, 2005. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental regulations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 20, 2005.
Ronald A. Kreizenbeck,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
0
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart WW--Washington
0
2. Section 52.2470 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(87) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.2470 Identification of plan
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(87) On September 20, 2001, and November 22, 2004, the Washington
State Department of Ecology submitted revisions to the Washington State
Implementation Plan consisting of A Plan for Attaining Carbon Monoxide
National Ambient Air Quality Standards in the Spokane Serious
Nonattainment Area. On September 26, 2001, the Washington State
Department of Ecology submitted minor revisions to the Washington State
Inspection and Maintenance Program.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation Administrative Order
No. DE 01AQIS-3285 dated October 24, 2001, and Kaiser Aluminum and
Chemical Corporation Administrative Order No. DE 01AQIS-3285, Amendment
1 dated April 9, 2003.
(B) Washington Administrative Code 173-422-031, ``Vehicle emission
inspection schedules,'' and Washington Administrative Code 173-422-170,
``Exemptions,'' as effective 12/2/2000.
(ii) Additional material.
A Plan for Attaining Carbon Monoxide National Ambient Air Quality
Standards in the Spokane Serious Nonattainment Area, adopted September
19, 2001, and November 17, 2004.
0
3. Paragraph (a) (2) of Sec. 52.2475 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2475 Approval of plans.
(a) * * *
(2) Spokane.
(i) EPA approves as a revision to the Washington State
Implementation Plan, A Plan for Attaining Carbon Monoxide National
Ambient Air Quality Standards in the Spokane Serious Nonattainment Area
submitted by the Washington Department of Ecology on September 20, 2001
and November 22, 2004.
(ii) [Reserved]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 05-9400 Filed 5-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P