Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Ohio New Source Review Rules, 24734-24740 [05-9403]
Download as PDF
24734
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Actions
Compliance
(2) Remove the airplane flight manual supplement for any
Aero Advantage ADV200 series (P/Ns ADVPL211CC and
ADVPL212CW) vacuum pump and monitor system from
the FAA-approved airplane flight manual (AFM).
(i) The owner/operator holding at least a private pilot certificate as authorized by section 43.7 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 43.7) may do the flight manual
changes requirement of this AD.
(ii) Make an entry in the aircraft records showing compliance
with this portion of the AD following section 43.9 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 43.9).
(3) Install an FAA-approved vacuum pump other than the affected part numbers.
As of the removal of any vacuum pump per paragraph (e)(1)
of this AD.
Not Applicable.
Before further flight after removing any Aero Advantage
ADV200 series (P/Ns ADVPL211CC or ADVPL212CW)
vacuum pump per paragraph (e)(1) of this AD.
As of the effective date of this AD ..........................................
Not Applicable.
(4) Do not install any Aero Advantage ADV200 series (P/Ns
ADVPL211CC and ADVPL212CW) vacuum pump.
May I Request an Alternative Method of
Compliance?
(f) You may request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD by following the procedures in 14
CFR 39.19. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise,
send your request to your principal
inspector. The principal inspector may add
comments and will send your request to the
Manager, Special Certification Office,
Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA. For information
on any already approved alternative methods
of compliance, contact Peter Hakala,
Aerospace Engineer, Special Certification
Office, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601
Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas
76193–0190; telephone: (817) 222–5145;
facsimile: (817) 222–5785.
May I Get Copies of the Documents
Referenced in This AD?
(g) To view the AD docket, go to the Docket
Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Nassif Building, Room PL–401, Washington,
DC, or on the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov.
The docket number is Docket No. FAA–
2005–20440; Directorate Identifier 2005–CE–
05–AD.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May 4,
2005.
Kim Smith,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–9366 Filed 5–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
40 CFR Part 52
[R05–OAR–2004–OH–0004; FRL–7910–5]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Ohio New
Source Review Rules
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
14:25 May 10, 2005
Comments must be received on
or before June 10, 2005. EPA will
address the public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule.
DATES:
Submit comments,
identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID No. R05–OAR–2004–
OH–0004, by one of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME, EPA’s
electronic public docket and comments
system, is EPA’s preferred method for
receiving comments. Once in the
system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key
in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the on-
ADDRESSES:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
VerDate jul<14>2003
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to
conditionally approve revisions to the
prevention of significant deterioration
(PSD) and nonattainment new source
review (NSR) construction permit
programs submitted by the Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency
(OEPA). EPA fully approved Ohio’s
nonattainment NSR program on January
10, 2003. EPA fully approved Ohio’s
PSD program on January 22, 2003,
which became effective on March 10,
2003.
On December 31, 2002, EPA
published revisions to the Federal PSD
and NSR regulations. These revisions
are commonly referred to as ‘‘NSR
Reform’’ regulations and became
effective on March 3, 2003. These
regulatory revisions include provisions
for baseline emissions determinations,
actual-to-future actual methodology,
plantwide applicability limits (PALs),
clean units, and pollution control
projects (PCPs). The OEPA is seeking
approval of rules to implement these
NSR Reform provisions in Ohio.
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Procedures
Not Applicable.
line instructions for submitting
comments.
E-mail: blakley.pamela@epa.gov.
Fax: (312) 886–5824.
Mail: You may send written
comments to:
Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air Permits
Section, (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Hand delivery: Deliver your
comments to: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air
Permits Section, (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
18th floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
RME ID No. R05–OAR–2004–OH–0004.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through RME, regulations.gov,
or e-mail. The EPA RME Web site and
the Federal regulations.gov Web site are
‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through RME or
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to Section I of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the RME
index at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or
in hard copy at Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and
Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. We
recommend that you telephone
Genevieve Damico, Environmental
Engineer, at (312) 353–4761 before
visiting the Region 5 office. The
Regional Office’s official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Genevieve Damico, Air Permits Section
(AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604,
Telephone Number: (312) 353–4761, EMail Address:
damico.genevieve@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. How can I get copies of this document
and other related information?
C. How and to whom do I submit
comments?
II. Program Review
A. What is being addressed in this
document?
B. What are the program changes that EPA
is approving?
III. Conditional Approval
A. Why are we proposing to conditionally
approve Ohio’s rules?
B. How can this conditional approval
become fully approved?
C. What are the ramifications for not
submitting the necessary changes?
IV. What Action is EPA Taking Today?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
VerDate jul<14>2003
11:53 May 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
24735
C. How and to whom do I submit
comments?
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may submit comments
This action applies to air pollution
electronically, by mail, or through hand
sources which are subject to Ohio’s
delivery/courier. To ensure proper
permit to install regulations in OAC
receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate
3745–31.
rulemaking identification number by
B. How can I get copies of this document including the text ‘‘Public comment on
proposed rulemaking Region 5 Air
and other related information ?
Docket R05-OAR–2004-OH–0004’’ in
1. The EPA Regional Office has
the subject line on the first page of your
established an electronic public
comment. Please ensure that your
rulemaking file available for inspection
comments are submitted within the
at RME under ID No. R05-OAR–2004specified comment period. Comments
OH–0004, and a hard copy file which is received after the close of the comment
available for inspection at the Regional
period will be marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not
Office. The official public file consists
required to consider these late
of the documents specifically referenced comments.
in this action, any public comments
II. Program Review
received, and other information related
to this action. Although a part of the
A. What is being addressed in this
official docket, the public rulemaking
document?
file does not include CBI or other
As stated in the December 31, 2002,
information whose disclosure is
EPA ‘‘NSR Reform’’ rulemaking, State
restricted by statute. The official public
and local permitting agencies must
rulemaking file is the collection of
adopt and submit revisions to their part
materials that is available for public
viewing at the Air Programs Branch, Air 51 permitting programs implementing
the minimum program elements of that
and Radiation Division, EPA Region 5,
rulemaking no later than January 2,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
2006 (67 FR 80240). With this submittal,
Illinois 60604. EPA requests that, if at
Ohio requests approval of program
all possible, you contact the person
revisions to satisfy this requirement.
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
The OEPA submitted these regulatory
CONTACT section to schedule your
revisions to EPA for parallel processing
inspection. The Regional Office’s
on September 14, 2004, which was prior
official hours of business are Monday
to final adoption of the State rules. Ohio
through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
adopted the final rules on October 28,
excluding Federal holidays.
2004.
2. Electronic Access. You may access
this Federal Register document
B. What are the program changes that
electronically through the
EPA is approving?
regulations.gov Web site located at
Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) 3745–
https://www.regulations.gov where you
31–01 Definitions
can find, review, and submit comments
3745–31–01(A)
on Federal rules that have been
published in the Federal Register, the
Ohio has incorporated the definitions
Government’s legal newspaper, and that codified in OAC 3745–21–01 to apply in
are open for comment.
OAC 3745–31 of the new rules. EPA
For public commenters, it is
proposes to approve these changes.
important to note that EPA’s policy is
Actual Emissions
that public comments, whether
Ohio has revised the definition of
submitted electronically or in paper,
‘‘actual emissions’’ in OAC 3745–31–
will be made available for public
01(C) to add the term ‘‘regulated NSR
viewing at the EPA Regional Office, as
EPA receives them and without change, pollutant’’ (see definition below), to
revise the language to specify the time
unless the comment contains
frame as a ‘‘consecutive twenty-four (24)
copyrighted material, CBI, or other
month period,’’ and to add language
information whose disclosure is
stating that this definition does not
restricted by statute. When EPA
apply for calculating a significant
identifies a comment containing
emissions increase or for establishing a
copyrighted material, EPA will provide
Plantwide Applicability Limit (PAL).
a reference to that material in the
version of the comment that is placed in Ohio also revised the rule language to
require that electric utility steam
the official public rulemaking file. The
generating unit actual emissions are to
entire printed comment, including the
be based on potential to emit rather than
copyrighted material, will be available
representative actual annual emissions.
at the Regional Office for public
The revised definition of ‘‘actual
inspection.
I. General Information
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
24736
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules
emissions’’ is consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(21) and
40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xii), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
Actuals PAL
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘actuals PAL’’ in OAC 3745–31–01(D).
This definition is consistent with the
definition of ‘‘clean unit’’ in 40 CFR
51.166(w)(2)(i) and 40 CFR
51.165(f)(2)(i), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Baseline Actual Emissions
Ohio has added a definition in OAC
3745–31–01 (O) to establish the baseline
actual emissions for any existing electric
utility steam generating unit to be the
average rate at which the unit actually
emitted the pollutant during any
consecutive 24-month period within the
5-year period immediately preceding
when the owner or operator begins
actual construction of the project. This
definition also establishes the baseline
actual emissions for any existing
emission unit other than an electric
utility steam generating unit to be the
average rate at which the unit actually
emitted the pollutant during any
consecutive 24-month period within the
10-year period immediately preceding
either the date when the owner or
operator beings actual construction of
the project or the date a complete permit
application is received by the permitting
authority for a permit required by this
rule. This definition establishes a zero
baseline for actual emissions for a new
emissions unit for purposes of
determining the emissions increase that
will result from the initial construction
and operation of the unit. Thereafter, for
all other purposes, the baseline actual
emissions shall equal the unit’s
potential to emit. Finally, this definition
also establishes the baseline actual
emissions for a PAL. This definition is
consistent with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(b)(47) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xxxv), therefore we propose
to approve this definition.
Baseline Concentration
Ohio has modified the definition of
‘‘baseline concentration’’ in OAC 3745–
31–01(Q). The definition now follows
the language of 40 CFR 51.166(b)(13),
therefore we propose to approve this
definition.
Best Available Control Technology
Ohio has modified the definition of
‘‘best available control technology’’ in
OAC 3745–31–01(S). The language
‘‘maximum degree of reduction for each
air pollutant subject to regulation under
the provisions of the CAA’’ has been
VerDate jul<14>2003
11:53 May 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
replaced with ‘‘maximum degree of
reduction for each regulated NSR
pollutant’’. This definition is consistent
with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(b)(12)) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xl), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Clean Unit
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘clean unit’’ in OAC 3745–31–01(Y).
This definition is consistent with the
definition of ‘‘clean unit’’ in 40 CFR
51.166(b)(41) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xxix), therefore we propose
to approve this definition.
Continuous Emissions Monitoring
System
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘continuous emissions monitoring
system’’ in OAC 3745–31–01(EE). This
is consistent with the definition of
‘‘continuous emissions monitoring
system’’ in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(43) and 40
CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxxi), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
Continuous Emissions Rate Monitoring
System (CERMS)
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘continuous emissions rate monitoring
system’’ in OAC 3745–31–01(FF). This
is consistent with the definition of
‘‘continuous emissions rate monitoring
system’’ in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(46) and 40
CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxxiv), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
Continuous Parameter Monitoring
System (CPMS)
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘continuous parameter monitoring
system’’ in OAC 3745–31–01(GG). This
is consistent with the definition of
‘‘continuous parameter monitoring
system’’ in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(45)) and 40
CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxxiii), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
Emissions Unit
Ohio has modified the definition of
‘‘emissions unit’’ in OAC 3745–31–
01(MM). This definition is consistent
with the definition of ‘‘emissions unit’’
in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(7) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(vii), therefore we propose
to approve this definition.
Lowest Achievable Emission Rate
(LAER)
Ohio has modified the definition of
‘‘lowest achievable emission rate’’ in
OAC 3745–31–01(FFF) by replacing
‘‘stationary source’’ with ‘‘emissions
unit’’ in the definition from 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xiii). OEPA believes that
the term emissions unit is more
appropriate than the term stationary
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
source because LAER universally
applies at the emissions unit level.
OEPA believes that LAER must be
determined at the emissions unit level
so that similar technologies can be
reviewed. OEPA also believes that
establishing LAER at the stationary
source level may cause overlooking of
the fact that a subpart of the stationary
source (an emissions unit) may be able
to emit at a lower level, even though the
stationary source may appear to meet
LAER.
This change is consistent with the
federal program concerning clean units
and PALs where LAER requirements
apply. In those instances, LAER is
applied at the emissions unit level.
Ohio’s change eliminates a dual
definition of ‘‘stationary source’’ and
makes clear that LAER is to be
determined at the emissions unit. EPA
proposes to approve this definition of
LAER.
Major Modification
Ohio has modified the definition of
‘‘major modification’’ in OAC 3745–31–
01(III) to add provisions regarding PCPs
and PALs. This modification is
consistent with 40 CFR 51.166(a)(7) and
(b)(2) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(v),
therefore we propose to approve this
definition.
Major Source Baseline Date
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘Major Source Baseline Date’’ in OAC
3745–31–01(JJJ). This is consistent with
the definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(14),
therefore we propose to approve this
definition.
Major Stationary Source
Ohio has modified the definition of
‘‘major stationary source’’ in OAC 3745–
31–01(KKK) to replace the phrase ‘‘air
pollutant subject to regulation under the
Clean Air Act including lead
compounds but excluding other air
pollutants regulated due to being listed
under section 112 of the Clean Air Act’’
with ‘‘regulated NSR pollutant.’’ These
modifications are consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(1) and 40
CFR 51.165(a)(1)(iv), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
Minor Source Baseline
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘Major Source Baseline Date’’ in OAC
3745–31–01(NNN). This is consistent
with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(b)(14), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Net Emissions Increase
Ohio has modified the definition of
‘‘net emissions increase’’ in OAC 3745–
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules
31–01(RRR) to add provisions regarding
clean units and PCPs and other minor
wording changes. These modifications
are consistent with the definition in 40
CFR 51.166(b)(3) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(vi), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
New Source Review Project
PAL Major Modification
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘PAL major modification’’ in OAC
3745–31–01(GGGG). This is consistent
with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(w)(2)(viii) and 40 CFR
51.165(f)(2)(viii), therefore we propose
to approve this definition.
PAL Permit
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘new source review project’’ in OAC
3745–31–01(UUU). This is consistent
with the definition in 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xxxix) and 40 CFR
51.166(a)(51), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘PAL permit’’ in OAC 3745–31–
01(HHHH). This is consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.166(w)(2)(ix)
and 40 CFR 51.165(f)(2)(ix), therefore
we propose to approve this definition.
Nonattainment or Nonattainment Area
PAL Pollutant
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘nonattainment or nonattainment area’’
in OAC 3745–31–01(VVV). This is
consistent with the requirements in 40
CFR 51.165(a)(2)(i), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘PAL pollutant’’ in OAC 3745–31–
01(IIII). This is consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.166(w)(2)(x) and
40 CFR 51.165(f)(2)(x), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
Nonattainment New Source Review
Permit
PAL Significant Emissions Unit
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘nonattainment new source review
permit’’ in OAC 3745–31–01(WWW).
This is consistent with the definition in
40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxx), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘PAL significant emissions unit’’ in
OAC 3745–31–01(JJJJ). This is consistent
with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(w)(2)(xi) and 40 CFR
51.165(f)(2)(xi), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
PAL Allowable Emissions
PAL Small Emissions Unit
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘PAL allowable emissions’’ in OAC
3745–31–01(CCCC). This is consistent
with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(w)(2)(ii) and 40 CFR
51.165(f)(2)(ii), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘PAL small emissions unit’’ in OAC
3745–31–01(KKKK). This is consistent
with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(w)(2)(iii) and 40 CFR
51.165(f)(2)(iii), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
PAL Effective Date
Particulate Matter and Particulate
Matter Emissions
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘PAL effective date’’ in OAC 3745–31–
01(DDDD). This is consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.166(w)(2)(vi)
and 40 CFR 51.165(f)(2)(vi), therefore
we propose to approve this definition.
Ohio referred to the definitions for
particulate matter and particulate matter
emissions from OAC 3745–17–01 which
is already approved by EPA.
PAL Effective Period
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘plantwide applicability limit’’ in OAC
3745–31–01(OOOO). This is consistent
with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(w)(2)(v) and 40 CFR
51.165(f)(2)(v), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘PAL effective date’’ in OAC 3745–31–
01(EEEE). This is consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.166(w)(2)(vii)
and 40 CFR 51.165(f)(2)(vii), therefore
we propose to approve this definition.
Plantwide Applicability Limit (PAL)
PAL Major Emissions Unit
PM10, PM10 Emissions, Total Suspended
Particulate
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘plantwide applicability limit’’ in OAC
3745–31–01(FFFF). This is consistent
with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(w)(2)(iv) and 40 CFR
51.165(f)(2)(iv), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Ohio has established the definitions
of ‘‘PM10’’, ‘‘PM10 emissions’’ and ‘‘total
suspended particulate’’ in OAC 3745–
31–01(PPPP), (QQQQ), and (UUUUU).
These definitions are consistent with 40
CFR 50 and 51, therefore we propose to
approve these definitions.
VerDate jul<14>2003
11:53 May 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24737
Pollution Control Project (PCP)
Ohio has modified the definition of
‘‘pollution control project’’ in OAC
3745–31–01(RRRR). This is consistent
with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(b)(31) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xxv), therefore we propose
to approve this definition.
Pollution Prevention
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘pollution prevention’’ in OAC 3745–
31–01(SSSS). This is consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(38)) and
40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxvi), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
Predictive Emissions Monitoring System
(PEMS)
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘predictive emissions monitoring
system’’ in OAC 3745–31–01(SSSS).
This is consistent with the definition in
40 CFR 51.166(b)(44) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xxxii), therefore we propose
to approve this definition.
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
Increment
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘prevention of significant deterioration
increment’’ in OAC 3745–31–
01(WWWW). This is consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.166(c), therefore
we propose to approve this definition.
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
Permit
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘prevention of significant deterioration
permit’’ in OAC 3745–31–01(XXXX).
This is consistent with the definition in
40 CFR 51.166(b)(42) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xli), therefore we propose
to approve this definition.
Projected Actual Emissions
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘projected actual emissions’’ in OAC
3745–31–01(ZZZZ). This is consistent
with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(b)(40) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xxviii), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
Regulated NSR Pollutant
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘regulated NSR pollutant’’ in OAC
3745–31–01(DDDDD). This definition is
consistent with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(b)(49) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xxxvii), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
Replacement Unit
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘replacement unit’’ in OAC 3745–31–
01(EEEEE). This definition is consistent
with the definition in 40 CFR
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
24738
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules
51.166(b)(32) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xxi), therefore we propose
to approve this definition.
change the substance of the definition,
therefore we propose to approve this
definition.
Representative Actual Annual
Emissions
Ohio has deleted this definition. It is
not required by the federal program.
Incorporation by Reference
Significant
Ohio has modified the definition of
‘‘significant’’ in OAC 3745–31–
01(KKKKK) to change the phrase ‘‘an air
pollutant subject to regulation under the
Clean Air Act’’ to ‘‘a regulated NSR
pollutant.’’ This definition has also been
modified to remove the reference to
pollutants listed in section 112(b) of the
Clean Air Act because section 112(b)
pollutants are exempt from NSR. These
changes are consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(23) and
40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(x), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
Significant Emissions Increase
Ohio has established the definition of
‘‘significant emissions increase’’ in OAC
3745–31–01(LLLLL). This is consistent
with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(b)(39) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xxvii), therefore we propose
to approve this definition.
Stationary Source
Ohio has modified the definition of
‘‘stationary source’’ in 326 IAC 2–2–
1(zz) to change the phrase ‘‘pollutant
subject to regulation under the CAA’’ to
‘‘regulated NSR pollutant.’’ This change
is consistent with the definition in 40
CFR 51.166(b)(5) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(i), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Non-40 CFR 51.166 and 51.165
Definitions
OAC 3745–31–01 (E), (J), (M), (X), (JJ),
(QQ), (DDD), (EEE), (XXX), (HHHHH),
and (XXXXX)
These definitions are associated with
future changes to OAC 3745–31–03
relating to Ohio’s minor source
permitting program. EPA proposes to
approve these definitions.
Minor Revisions to Definitions
Ohio has made changes to the
definitions of ‘‘available information,’’
‘‘baseline area,’’ ‘‘baseline
concentration,’’ ‘‘best available
technology,’’ ‘‘Clean Air Act,’’ ‘‘Clean
Coal Technology,’’ ‘‘Clean Coal
Technology Demonstration Project,’’
‘‘Construction,’’ ‘‘facility,’’ ‘‘nonmethane organic compound,’’ ‘‘Nonroad engine,’’ and ‘‘Temporary clean
coal demonstration project,’’ that are
grammatical in nature and do not
VerDate jul<14>2003
11:53 May 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
Ohio has added the Aerometric
Information Retrieval System, California
Air Resources Board, Chemical Abstract
Service, Chemical Rubber Company
Handbook for Chemistry and Physics,
Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission
Factors, AP–42, Control Technology
Center, Great Lakes Binational Toxics
Strategy, Integrated Risk Management
System, and Recommended Policy on
Control of Volatile Organic Compounds
to OAC 3745–31–01(ZZZZZ)(1). Ohio
has removed the reference to the Further
Continuing Appropriations Act of 1985
from this section.
Ohio has also updated and added to
the incorporations by reference in OAC
3745–31–01(ZZZZZ)(2). Ohio has added
references to 40 CFR 51.165; 40 CFR
60.15(b)(1); 40 CFR 60.111b; 40 CFR
81.336; 40 CFR part 50, appendix J; 40
CFR part 51, appendix M; 40 CFR part
51, appendix S; 40 CFR part 53; 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A; 40 CFR part 60,
subpart Dc; 40 CFR part 82, subpart A;
42 U.S.C. 7401 to 7671q; Chemical
Rubber Company Handbook for
Chemistry and Physics; Federal Power
Act; New Source Performance
Standards; Part C of Title I of the Clean
Air Act; Part D of Title I of the Clean
Air Act; Recommended Policy on
Control of Volatile Organic Compounds;
Section 2(A) and (B) of the Energy
Supply and Environmental
Coordination Act of 1974; Section 110
of the Clean Air Act; Section 107(d) of
the Clean Air Act; Section 108 of the
Clean Air Act; Section 109 of the Clean
Air Act; Section 111 of the Clean Air
Act; Section 112 of the Clean Air Act;
Section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act;
Section 112(c) of the Clean Air Act;
Section 113 of the Clean Air Act;
Section 121(e) of the Clean Air Act;
Section 125 of the Clean Air Act;
Section 173 of the Clean Air Act,
Section 182(c) of the Clean Air Act;
Section 182(f) of the Clean Air Act;
Section 189 of the Clean Air Act;
Section 202 of the Clean Air Act;
Section 216 of the Clean Air Act;
Section 402(12) of Title IV of the Clean
Air Act; Section 409 of the Clean Air
Act; Standard Industrial Classification
Manual; Title II of the Clean Air Act;
Title IV of the Clean Air Act, and Title
VI of the Clean Air Act. Ohio has
removed from OAC 3745–31–
01(ZZZZZ)(2) Title II sec. 101(d) of the
Further Continuing Appropriations Act
of 1985.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
OAC 3745–31–09 Air Permit To Install
Completeness Determinations, Public
Participation and Public Notice
Ohio has modified OAC 3745–31–
09(H)(1) to replace the phrase ‘‘air
contaminant source or modification’’
with ‘‘nonattainment NSR permit or the
PSD permit’’. This change is consistent
with the changes in definitions required
by 40 CFR 51.166(b)(42), 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xxx) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xli).Ohio also made a
spelling correction in OAC 3745–31–
09(H)(2)(d). Therefore we propose to
approve this rule.
OAC 3745–31–10 Air Stationary
Source Obligations
Ohio has added the source obligations
in 40 CFR 51.166 (r). Ohio doesn’t
include the requirements of
70.4(b)(3)(vii). Ohio also adds the
language ‘‘if any provision of OAC
3745–31–10 through 3745–31–32 or the
application of such provision to any
person or circumstance, is held invalid,
the remainder of this section, or the
application of such provision to persons
or circumstances other then those as to
which it is held invalid, shall not be
affected thereby.’’ EPA proposes to
approve these changes.
OAC 3745–31–13 Attainment
Provisions—Review of Major Stationary
Sources and Major Modifications,
Stationary Source Applicability and
Exemptions
Ohio has modified OAC 3745–31–13
(B) and (G) to replace the phrase ‘‘air
pollutant subject to regulation under the
Clean Air Act that the stationary source
would emit, except for air pollutants
listed under 112 of the Clean Air Act’’
and ‘‘air pollutant subject to regulation
under the Clean Air Act’’ respectively
with ‘‘regulated NSR pollutant’’. This is
consistent with 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49)
and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxxvii). Ohio
also modified OAC 3745–31–13(D)(2)(d)
by replacing the term ‘‘reviewing
authority’’ with ‘‘director,’’ and OAC
3745–31–13(H) by clarifying that the
units of measure are µg/m3, and
removing mercury, beryllium, and vinyl
chloride. This is consistent with 40 CFR
51.166(i). Therefore we propose to
approve this rule.
OAC 3745–31–15 Attainment
Provisions—Control Technology Review
Ohio has modified OAC 3745–31–
15(B) to include references to 40 CFR
part 63 and OAC 3745–31–1 (C), and (D)
to replace the phrase ‘‘air pollutant
subject to regulation under the Clean
Air Act excluding pollutants regulated
due to being listed under Section 112 of
the Clean Air Act’’ and ‘‘air pollutant
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules
subject to regulation under the Clean
Air Act’’ with ‘‘regulated NSR
pollutant.’’ This is consistent with 40
CFR 51.166(b)(49) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xxxvii). Therefore we
propose to approve this rule.
OAC 3745–31–21
Provisions
Nonattainment
Ohio has modified OAC 3745–31–21
(B) to replace the phrase ‘‘air pollutant
subject to regulation under the Clean
Air Act’’ with ‘‘regulated NSR
pollutant’’. This is consistent with 40
CFR 51.166(b)(49) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xxxvii). Ohio also added
language to OAC 3745–31–21 (E) to
clarify that projects referenced therein
are clean coal technology demonstration
projects, and that ‘‘Section 111 and Part
C’’ refer to Section 111 and Part C of the
Clean Air Act. EPA proposes to approve
these changes.
OAC 3745–31–22 Nonattainment
Provisions—Conditions for Approval
In addition to grammatical updates to
OAC 3745–31–22, Ohio has established
OAC 3745–31–22(A)(3)(e) and (f) not
permitting decreases from actual
emissions from the installation of addon control technology or application of
pollution prevention measures and
clean units or pollution control projects
except as provided by the rule. This
language is consistent with 40 CFR
51.165(a)(3)(ii)(H) and (I).
Ohio also established OAC 3745–31–
22(A)(3)(g) providing the offset
requirements for increased emissions
from major modifications. This language
is consistent with 40 CFR
51.165(a)(3)(ii)(J). Therefore we propose
to approve this rule.
OAC 3745–31–24 Non-Attainment
Provisions—Baseline for Determining
Credit for Emission and Air Quality
Offsets
In addition to grammatical updates to
OAC 3745–31–24(A), (E) and (H), Ohio
has established rules for establishing a
baseline for determining credit for
emission reductions in OAC 3745–31–
24(B) and (C). This language is
consistent with 40 CFR 51.165(a)(3)(i)
and (ii)(A). Ohio has removed language
describing the baseline time period and
calculation of baseline emissions which
primarily refer to the most recent two
year period as the basis for the baseline.
The federal program no longer has such
a requirement.
Ohio also established OAC 3745–31–
24(K) which requires all emission
reductions claimed as offset credit to be
federally enforceable. This language is
consistent with 40 CFR
VerDate jul<14>2003
11:53 May 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
51.165(a)(3)(ii)(E). Therefore we propose
to approve this rule.
OAC 3745–31–26 Nonattainment
Provisions—Offset Ratio Requirements
Ohio has modified the VOC offset
requirement provision in OAC 3745–
31–26(A) to include an offset ratio for
unclassified areas of greater than 1.0 to
1.0. This language is consistent with
section 173(c) of the Clean Air Act.
Therefore we propose to approve this
rule.
OAC 3745–31–30 Clean Units
Ohio has added a new rule section for
emission units that are subject to BACT
or LAER and qualify for a clean unit
designation. These rules, for the most
part, are consistent with provisions at
40 CFR 51.166(t) and (u) and 40 CFR
51.165(c) and (d) for clean units.
However, although Ohio intended only
LAER to apply in nonattainment areas,
as drafted, OAC 3745–31–30 is not clear
that a LAER determination is required
for a clean unit designation in an
existing nonattainment area. The
language in OAC 3745–31–30(A)(5)(a)
must also include current-day LAER
requirements for non-attainment areas,
in addition to BACT for attainment
areas.
In a March 2, 2005 letter to EPA,
OEPA has committed to clarify its rules
in this regard, and, until the rule is
clarified, the conditionally approved
rules will be implemented as requiring
a LAER determination in nonattainment
areas in order to obtain a clean unit
designation. Therefore we propose to
conditionally approve this rule.
OAC 3745–31–31 Pollution Control
Project
OAC 3745–31–31 establishes a
pollution control project exclusion
provision in Ohio’s permit to install
regulations. This addition to Ohio’s rule
is consistent with the requirements in
40 CFR 51.166(v) and 40 CFR 51.165(e).
Therefore we propose to approve this
rule.
OAC 3745–31–32 Plantwide
Applicability Limit (PAL)
This section of the Ohio permit to
install rules regarding PAL applicability
is consistent with 40 CFR 51.166(w) and
40 CFR 51.165(f). Therefore we propose
to approve this rule.
III. Conditional Approval
A. Why are we proposing to
conditionally approve Ohio’s rules?
We are proposing to conditionally
approve Ohio’s permit to install rules,
OAC 3745–31–30. These rules, for the
most part, fulfill part C of title I of the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24739
CAA by incorporating the critical
provisions at 40 CFR 51.165 and 51.166
for clean units. However, although Ohio
intended only LAER to apply in
nonattainment areas, the proposed
language of OAC 3745–31–30 does not
make clear that a LAER determination is
required for a clean unit designation in
an existing nonattainment area. In
addition to BACT for attainment areas,
the language in OAC 3745–31–
30(A)(5)(a) must also include currentday LAER requirements for nonattainment areas.
OEPA has committed, in a March 2,
2005 letter, to clarify its rules in this
regard and, in the interim, to require a
LAER determination in nonattainment
areas in order to obtain a clean unit
designation. Because OAC 3745–31–30
meets all requirements of 40 CFR 51.165
and 51.166 for clean units with the
exceptions noted above, and because
OEPA has committed to correct the
deficiencies, we believe that it is
appropriate to propose to conditionally
approve these rules. Once OEPA
submits the rule changes to address
these deficiencies, we can take action to
fully approve the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) revision.
B. How can this conditional approval
become fully approved?
OEPA will have one year from the
time that the conditional approval is
final to submit the necessary changes to
its rules to correct the deficiencies
identified in this action. If OEPA does
not submit changes within the one year
timeframe, this conditional approval
will automatically revert to a
disapproval of the Ohio SIP.
C. What are the ramifications for not
submitting the necessary changes?
If OEPA fails to submit the necessary
rule changes to us, final conditional
approval will automatically convert to a
disapproval. EPA would confirm such
disapproval to the State by letter. If the
SIP becomes disapproved, these
commitments will no longer be a part of
the approved SIP. We would
subsequently publish a notice to this
effect in the notice section of the
Federal Register indicating that the
commitment or commitments have been
disapproved and removed from the SIP.
If OEPA adopts and submits the final
rule amendments to EPA within the
applicable time frame, the conditionally
approved commitments will remain part
of the SIP until the EPA takes final
action approving or disapproving the
new submittal, those newly approved
rules will become part of the SIP.
If after considering the comments on
the subsequent submittal, we issue a
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
24740
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules
final disapproval, the sanctions clock
under 179(a) will begin. If OEPA does
not submit and we do not approve the
rule on which any disapproval is based
within 18 months of the disapproval, we
must impose one of the sanctions under
section 179(b) highway funding
restrictions or the offset sanction. In
addition, any final disapproval would
start the 24-month clock for the
imposition of section 110(c) Federal
Implementation Plan. Finally, under
section 110(m) the EPA has
discretionary authority to impose
sanctions at any time after final
disapproval.
IV. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?
EPA is proposing conditional
approval of Ohio permit to install
revisions. On December 31, 2002, EPA
published revisions to the federal PSD
and NSR regulations in 40 CFR parts 51
and 52 (67 FR 80186). These ‘‘NSR
Reform’’ regulatory revisions became
effective on March 3, 2003, and include
provisions for baseline emissions
determinations, actual-to-future actual
methodology, plantwide applicability
limits (PALs), clean units, and pollution
control projects (PCPs). EPA is
proposing to conditionally approve
OEPA’s revised rules to implement
these NSR Reform provisions.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Executive Order 12866; Regulatory
Planning and Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget.
Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
Because it is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866 or a ‘‘significant energy
action,’’ this action is also not subject to
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed action merely proposes
to approve State law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
State law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:25 May 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Because this rule proposes to approve
pre-existing requirements under State
law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
by State law, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4).
Executive Order 13175 Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This proposed rule also does not have
tribal implications because it will not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(59 FR 22951, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 13132 Federalism
This action also does not have
Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
proposes to approve a State rule
implementing a Federal standard, and
does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act.
Executive Order 13045 Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
This proposed rule also is not subject
to Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
National Technology Transfer
Advancement Act
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose
an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: April 29, 2005.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 05–9403 Filed 5–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 64
[WC DOCKET NO. 03–225; FCC 05–71]
Request To Update Default
Compensation Rate for Dial-Around
Calls From Payphones
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Further notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission seeks current and accurate
data on the average number of
compensable dial-around calls made
from payphones on a monthly basis.
This average monthly data will be used
to calculate a monthly per-payphone
default compensation rate, which will
apply to payphones that are not
connected to Flex ANI, a call-tracking
technology.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
June 27, 2005. Submit reply comments
on or before July 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by WC Docket No. 03–225, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Agency Web site: https://
www.fcc.gov. Follow the instructions for
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 11, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24734-24740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-9403]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R05-OAR-2004-OH-0004; FRL-7910-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Ohio New
Source Review Rules
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to conditionally approve revisions to the
prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) and nonattainment new
source review (NSR) construction permit programs submitted by the Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA). EPA fully approved Ohio's
nonattainment NSR program on January 10, 2003. EPA fully approved
Ohio's PSD program on January 22, 2003, which became effective on March
10, 2003.
On December 31, 2002, EPA published revisions to the Federal PSD
and NSR regulations. These revisions are commonly referred to as ``NSR
Reform'' regulations and became effective on March 3, 2003. These
regulatory revisions include provisions for baseline emissions
determinations, actual-to-future actual methodology, plantwide
applicability limits (PALs), clean units, and pollution control
projects (PCPs). The OEPA is seeking approval of rules to implement
these NSR Reform provisions in Ohio.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 10, 2005. EPA will
address the public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by Regional Material in EDocket
(RME) ID No. R05-OAR-2004-OH-0004, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME, EPA's
electronic public docket and comments system, is EPA's preferred method
for receiving comments. Once in the system, select ``quick search,''
then key in the appropriate RME Docket identification number. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: blakley.pamela@epa.gov.
Fax: (312) 886-5824.
Mail: You may send written comments to:
Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air Permits Section, (AR-18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
Hand delivery: Deliver your comments to: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air
Permits Section, (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 18th floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours
of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to RME ID No. R05-OAR-2004-OH-
0004. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through RME, regulations.gov,
or e-mail. The EPA RME Web site and the Federal regulations.gov Web
site are ``anonymous access'' systems, which means EPA will not know
your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body
of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
[[Page 24735]]
recommends that you include your name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For
additional instructions on submitting comments, go to Section I of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
RME index at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Publicly
available docket materials are available either electronically in RME
or in hard copy at Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and
Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
We recommend that you telephone Genevieve Damico, Environmental
Engineer, at (312) 353-4761 before visiting the Region 5 office. The
Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Genevieve Damico, Air Permits Section
(AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604, Telephone Number: (312) 353-4761,
E-Mail Address: damico.genevieve@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. How can I get copies of this document and other related
information?
C. How and to whom do I submit comments?
II. Program Review
A. What is being addressed in this document?
B. What are the program changes that EPA is approving?
III. Conditional Approval
A. Why are we proposing to conditionally approve Ohio's rules?
B. How can this conditional approval become fully approved?
C. What are the ramifications for not submitting the necessary
changes?
IV. What Action is EPA Taking Today?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action applies to air pollution sources which are subject to
Ohio's permit to install regulations in OAC 3745-31.
B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information
?
1. The EPA Regional Office has established an electronic public
rulemaking file available for inspection at RME under ID No. R05-OAR-
2004-OH-0004, and a hard copy file which is available for inspection at
the Regional Office. The official public file consists of the documents
specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received,
and other information related to this action. Although a part of the
official docket, the public rulemaking file does not include CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The
official public rulemaking file is the collection of materials that is
available for public viewing at the Air Programs Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, EPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. EPA requests that, if at all possible, you contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding
Federal holidays.
2. Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the regulations.gov Web site located at https://
www.regulations.gov where you can find, review, and submit comments on
Federal rules that have been published in the Federal Register, the
Government's legal newspaper, and that are open for comment.
For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is
that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public viewing at the EPA Regional Office,
as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing
copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in
the version of the comment that is placed in the official public
rulemaking file. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted
material, will be available at the Regional Office for public
inspection.
C. How and to whom do I submit comments?
You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand
delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the
appropriate rulemaking identification number by including the text
``Public comment on proposed rulemaking Region 5 Air Docket R05-OAR-
2004-OH-0004'' in the subject line on the first page of your comment.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.
II. Program Review
A. What is being addressed in this document?
As stated in the December 31, 2002, EPA ``NSR Reform'' rulemaking,
State and local permitting agencies must adopt and submit revisions to
their part 51 permitting programs implementing the minimum program
elements of that rulemaking no later than January 2, 2006 (67 FR
80240). With this submittal, Ohio requests approval of program
revisions to satisfy this requirement.
The OEPA submitted these regulatory revisions to EPA for parallel
processing on September 14, 2004, which was prior to final adoption of
the State rules. Ohio adopted the final rules on October 28, 2004.
B. What are the program changes that EPA is approving?
Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) 3745-31-01 Definitions
3745-31-01(A)
Ohio has incorporated the definitions codified in OAC 3745-21-01 to
apply in OAC 3745-31 of the new rules. EPA proposes to approve these
changes.
Actual Emissions
Ohio has revised the definition of ``actual emissions'' in OAC
3745-31-01(C) to add the term ``regulated NSR pollutant'' (see
definition below), to revise the language to specify the time frame as
a ``consecutive twenty-four (24) month period,'' and to add language
stating that this definition does not apply for calculating a
significant emissions increase or for establishing a Plantwide
Applicability Limit (PAL). Ohio also revised the rule language to
require that electric utility steam generating unit actual emissions
are to be based on potential to emit rather than representative actual
annual emissions. The revised definition of ``actual
[[Page 24736]]
emissions'' is consistent with the definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(21)
and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xii), therefore we propose to approve this
definition.
Actuals PAL
Ohio has established the definition of ``actuals PAL'' in OAC 3745-
31-01(D). This definition is consistent with the definition of ``clean
unit'' in 40 CFR 51.166(w)(2)(i) and 40 CFR 51.165(f)(2)(i), therefore
we propose to approve this definition.
Baseline Actual Emissions
Ohio has added a definition in OAC 3745-31-01 (O) to establish the
baseline actual emissions for any existing electric utility steam
generating unit to be the average rate at which the unit actually
emitted the pollutant during any consecutive 24-month period within the
5-year period immediately preceding when the owner or operator begins
actual construction of the project. This definition also establishes
the baseline actual emissions for any existing emission unit other than
an electric utility steam generating unit to be the average rate at
which the unit actually emitted the pollutant during any consecutive
24-month period within the 10-year period immediately preceding either
the date when the owner or operator beings actual construction of the
project or the date a complete permit application is received by the
permitting authority for a permit required by this rule. This
definition establishes a zero baseline for actual emissions for a new
emissions unit for purposes of determining the emissions increase that
will result from the initial construction and operation of the unit.
Thereafter, for all other purposes, the baseline actual emissions shall
equal the unit's potential to emit. Finally, this definition also
establishes the baseline actual emissions for a PAL. This definition is
consistent with the definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(47) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xxxv), therefore we propose to approve this definition.
Baseline Concentration
Ohio has modified the definition of ``baseline concentration'' in
OAC 3745-31-01(Q). The definition now follows the language of 40 CFR
51.166(b)(13), therefore we propose to approve this definition.
Best Available Control Technology
Ohio has modified the definition of ``best available control
technology'' in OAC 3745-31-01(S). The language ``maximum degree of
reduction for each air pollutant subject to regulation under the
provisions of the CAA'' has been replaced with ``maximum degree of
reduction for each regulated NSR pollutant''. This definition is
consistent with the definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(12)) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xl), therefore we propose to approve this definition.
Clean Unit
Ohio has established the definition of ``clean unit'' in OAC 3745-
31-01(Y). This definition is consistent with the definition of ``clean
unit'' in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(41) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxix), therefore
we propose to approve this definition.
Continuous Emissions Monitoring System
Ohio has established the definition of ``continuous emissions
monitoring system'' in OAC 3745-31-01(EE). This is consistent with the
definition of ``continuous emissions monitoring system'' in 40 CFR
51.166(b)(43) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxxi), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Continuous Emissions Rate Monitoring System (CERMS)
Ohio has established the definition of ``continuous emissions rate
monitoring system'' in OAC 3745-31-01(FF). This is consistent with the
definition of ``continuous emissions rate monitoring system'' in 40 CFR
51.166(b)(46) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxxiv), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Continuous Parameter Monitoring System (CPMS)
Ohio has established the definition of ``continuous parameter
monitoring system'' in OAC 3745-31-01(GG). This is consistent with the
definition of ``continuous parameter monitoring system'' in 40 CFR
51.166(b)(45)) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxxiii), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Emissions Unit
Ohio has modified the definition of ``emissions unit'' in OAC 3745-
31-01(MM). This definition is consistent with the definition of
``emissions unit'' in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(7) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(vii),
therefore we propose to approve this definition.
Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER)
Ohio has modified the definition of ``lowest achievable emission
rate'' in OAC 3745-31-01(FFF) by replacing ``stationary source'' with
``emissions unit'' in the definition from 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xiii).
OEPA believes that the term emissions unit is more appropriate than the
term stationary source because LAER universally applies at the
emissions unit level. OEPA believes that LAER must be determined at the
emissions unit level so that similar technologies can be reviewed. OEPA
also believes that establishing LAER at the stationary source level may
cause overlooking of the fact that a subpart of the stationary source
(an emissions unit) may be able to emit at a lower level, even though
the stationary source may appear to meet LAER.
This change is consistent with the federal program concerning clean
units and PALs where LAER requirements apply. In those instances, LAER
is applied at the emissions unit level. Ohio's change eliminates a dual
definition of ``stationary source'' and makes clear that LAER is to be
determined at the emissions unit. EPA proposes to approve this
definition of LAER.
Major Modification
Ohio has modified the definition of ``major modification'' in OAC
3745-31-01(III) to add provisions regarding PCPs and PALs. This
modification is consistent with 40 CFR 51.166(a)(7) and (b)(2) and 40
CFR 51.165(a)(1)(v), therefore we propose to approve this definition.
Major Source Baseline Date
Ohio has established the definition of ``Major Source Baseline
Date'' in OAC 3745-31-01(JJJ). This is consistent with the definition
in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(14), therefore we propose to approve this
definition.
Major Stationary Source
Ohio has modified the definition of ``major stationary source'' in
OAC 3745-31-01(KKK) to replace the phrase ``air pollutant subject to
regulation under the Clean Air Act including lead compounds but
excluding other air pollutants regulated due to being listed under
section 112 of the Clean Air Act'' with ``regulated NSR pollutant.''
These modifications are consistent with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(b)(1) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(iv), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Minor Source Baseline
Ohio has established the definition of ``Major Source Baseline
Date'' in OAC 3745-31-01(NNN). This is consistent with the definition
in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(14), therefore we propose to approve this
definition.
Net Emissions Increase
Ohio has modified the definition of ``net emissions increase'' in
OAC 3745-
[[Page 24737]]
31-01(RRR) to add provisions regarding clean units and PCPs and other
minor wording changes. These modifications are consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(3) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(vi),
therefore we propose to approve this definition.
New Source Review Project
Ohio has established the definition of ``new source review
project'' in OAC 3745-31-01(UUU). This is consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxxix) and 40 CFR 51.166(a)(51),
therefore we propose to approve this definition.
Nonattainment or Nonattainment Area
Ohio has established the definition of ``nonattainment or
nonattainment area'' in OAC 3745-31-01(VVV). This is consistent with
the requirements in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(2)(i), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Nonattainment New Source Review Permit
Ohio has established the definition of ``nonattainment new source
review permit'' in OAC 3745-31-01(WWW). This is consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxx), therefore we propose to approve
this definition.
PAL Allowable Emissions
Ohio has established the definition of ``PAL allowable emissions''
in OAC 3745-31-01(CCCC). This is consistent with the definition in 40
CFR 51.166(w)(2)(ii) and 40 CFR 51.165(f)(2)(ii), therefore we propose
to approve this definition.
PAL Effective Date
Ohio has established the definition of ``PAL effective date'' in
OAC 3745-31-01(DDDD). This is consistent with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(w)(2)(vi) and 40 CFR 51.165(f)(2)(vi), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
PAL Effective Period
Ohio has established the definition of ``PAL effective date'' in
OAC 3745-31-01(EEEE). This is consistent with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(w)(2)(vii) and 40 CFR 51.165(f)(2)(vii), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
PAL Major Emissions Unit
Ohio has established the definition of ``plantwide applicability
limit'' in OAC 3745-31-01(FFFF). This is consistent with the definition
in 40 CFR 51.166(w)(2)(iv) and 40 CFR 51.165(f)(2)(iv), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
PAL Major Modification
Ohio has established the definition of ``PAL major modification''
in OAC 3745-31-01(GGGG). This is consistent with the definition in 40
CFR 51.166(w)(2)(viii) and 40 CFR 51.165(f)(2)(viii), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
PAL Permit
Ohio has established the definition of ``PAL permit'' in OAC 3745-
31-01(HHHH). This is consistent with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(w)(2)(ix) and 40 CFR 51.165(f)(2)(ix), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
PAL Pollutant
Ohio has established the definition of ``PAL pollutant'' in OAC
3745-31-01(IIII). This is consistent with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(w)(2)(x) and 40 CFR 51.165(f)(2)(x), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
PAL Significant Emissions Unit
Ohio has established the definition of ``PAL significant emissions
unit'' in OAC 3745-31-01(JJJJ). This is consistent with the definition
in 40 CFR 51.166(w)(2)(xi) and 40 CFR 51.165(f)(2)(xi), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
PAL Small Emissions Unit
Ohio has established the definition of ``PAL small emissions unit''
in OAC 3745-31-01(KKKK). This is consistent with the definition in 40
CFR 51.166(w)(2)(iii) and 40 CFR 51.165(f)(2)(iii), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
Particulate Matter and Particulate Matter Emissions
Ohio referred to the definitions for particulate matter and
particulate matter emissions from OAC 3745-17-01 which is already
approved by EPA.
Plantwide Applicability Limit (PAL)
Ohio has established the definition of ``plantwide applicability
limit'' in OAC 3745-31-01(OOOO). This is consistent with the definition
in 40 CFR 51.166(w)(2)(v) and 40 CFR 51.165(f)(2)(v), therefore we
propose to approve this definition.
PM10, PM10 Emissions, Total Suspended Particulate
Ohio has established the definitions of ``PM10'',
``PM10 emissions'' and ``total suspended particulate'' in
OAC 3745-31-01(PPPP), (QQQQ), and (UUUUU). These definitions are
consistent with 40 CFR 50 and 51, therefore we propose to approve these
definitions.
Pollution Control Project (PCP)
Ohio has modified the definition of ``pollution control project''
in OAC 3745-31-01(RRRR). This is consistent with the definition in 40
CFR 51.166(b)(31) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxv), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Pollution Prevention
Ohio has established the definition of ``pollution prevention'' in
OAC 3745-31-01(SSSS). This is consistent with the definition in 40 CFR
51.166(b)(38)) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxvi), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Predictive Emissions Monitoring System (PEMS)
Ohio has established the definition of ``predictive emissions
monitoring system'' in OAC 3745-31-01(SSSS). This is consistent with
the definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(44) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxxii),
therefore we propose to approve this definition.
Prevention of Significant Deterioration Increment
Ohio has established the definition of ``prevention of significant
deterioration increment'' in OAC 3745-31-01(WWWW). This is consistent
with the definition in 40 CFR 51.166(c), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit
Ohio has established the definition of ``prevention of significant
deterioration permit'' in OAC 3745-31-01(XXXX). This is consistent with
the definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(42) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xli),
therefore we propose to approve this definition.
Projected Actual Emissions
Ohio has established the definition of ``projected actual
emissions'' in OAC 3745-31-01(ZZZZ). This is consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(40) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxviii),
therefore we propose to approve this definition.
Regulated NSR Pollutant
Ohio has established the definition of ``regulated NSR pollutant''
in OAC 3745-31-01(DDDDD). This definition is consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxxvii),
therefore we propose to approve this definition.
Replacement Unit
Ohio has established the definition of ``replacement unit'' in OAC
3745-31-01(EEEEE). This definition is consistent with the definition in
40 CFR
[[Page 24738]]
51.166(b)(32) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxi), therefore we propose to
approve this definition.
Representative Actual Annual Emissions
Ohio has deleted this definition. It is not required by the federal
program.
Significant
Ohio has modified the definition of ``significant'' in OAC 3745-31-
01(KKKKK) to change the phrase ``an air pollutant subject to regulation
under the Clean Air Act'' to ``a regulated NSR pollutant.'' This
definition has also been modified to remove the reference to pollutants
listed in section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act because section 112(b)
pollutants are exempt from NSR. These changes are consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(23) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(x),
therefore we propose to approve this definition.
Significant Emissions Increase
Ohio has established the definition of ``significant emissions
increase'' in OAC 3745-31-01(LLLLL). This is consistent with the
definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(39) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxvii),
therefore we propose to approve this definition.
Stationary Source
Ohio has modified the definition of ``stationary source'' in 326
IAC 2-2-1(zz) to change the phrase ``pollutant subject to regulation
under the CAA'' to ``regulated NSR pollutant.'' This change is
consistent with the definition in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(5) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(i), therefore we propose to approve this definition.
Non-40 CFR 51.166 and 51.165 Definitions
OAC 3745-31-01 (E), (J), (M), (X), (JJ), (QQ), (DDD), (EEE), (XXX),
(HHHHH), and (XXXXX)
These definitions are associated with future changes to OAC 3745-
31-03 relating to Ohio's minor source permitting program. EPA proposes
to approve these definitions.
Minor Revisions to Definitions
Ohio has made changes to the definitions of ``available
information,'' ``baseline area,'' ``baseline concentration,'' ``best
available technology,'' ``Clean Air Act,'' ``Clean Coal Technology,''
``Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Project,'' ``Construction,''
``facility,'' ``non-methane organic compound,'' ``Non-road engine,''
and ``Temporary clean coal demonstration project,'' that are
grammatical in nature and do not change the substance of the
definition, therefore we propose to approve this definition.
Incorporation by Reference
Ohio has added the Aerometric Information Retrieval System,
California Air Resources Board, Chemical Abstract Service, Chemical
Rubber Company Handbook for Chemistry and Physics, Compilation of Air
Pollutant Emission Factors, AP-42, Control Technology Center, Great
Lakes Binational Toxics Strategy, Integrated Risk Management System,
and Recommended Policy on Control of Volatile Organic Compounds to OAC
3745-31-01(ZZZZZ)(1). Ohio has removed the reference to the Further
Continuing Appropriations Act of 1985 from this section.
Ohio has also updated and added to the incorporations by reference
in OAC 3745-31-01(ZZZZZ)(2). Ohio has added references to 40 CFR
51.165; 40 CFR 60.15(b)(1); 40 CFR 60.111b; 40 CFR 81.336; 40 CFR part
50, appendix J; 40 CFR part 51, appendix M; 40 CFR part 51, appendix S;
40 CFR part 53; 40 CFR part 60, appendix A; 40 CFR part 60, subpart Dc;
40 CFR part 82, subpart A; 42 U.S.C. 7401 to 7671q; Chemical Rubber
Company Handbook for Chemistry and Physics; Federal Power Act; New
Source Performance Standards; Part C of Title I of the Clean Air Act;
Part D of Title I of the Clean Air Act; Recommended Policy on Control
of Volatile Organic Compounds; Section 2(A) and (B) of the Energy
Supply and Environmental Coordination Act of 1974; Section 110 of the
Clean Air Act; Section 107(d) of the Clean Air Act; Section 108 of the
Clean Air Act; Section 109 of the Clean Air Act; Section 111 of the
Clean Air Act; Section 112 of the Clean Air Act; Section 112(b) of the
Clean Air Act; Section 112(c) of the Clean Air Act; Section 113 of the
Clean Air Act; Section 121(e) of the Clean Air Act; Section 125 of the
Clean Air Act; Section 173 of the Clean Air Act, Section 182(c) of the
Clean Air Act; Section 182(f) of the Clean Air Act; Section 189 of the
Clean Air Act; Section 202 of the Clean Air Act; Section 216 of the
Clean Air Act; Section 402(12) of Title IV of the Clean Air Act;
Section 409 of the Clean Air Act; Standard Industrial Classification
Manual; Title II of the Clean Air Act; Title IV of the Clean Air Act,
and Title VI of the Clean Air Act. Ohio has removed from OAC 3745-31-
01(ZZZZZ)(2) Title II sec. 101(d) of the Further Continuing
Appropriations Act of 1985.
OAC 3745-31-09 Air Permit To Install Completeness Determinations,
Public Participation and Public Notice
Ohio has modified OAC 3745-31-09(H)(1) to replace the phrase ``air
contaminant source or modification'' with `` nonattainment NSR permit
or the PSD permit''. This change is consistent with the changes in
definitions required by 40 CFR 51.166(b)(42), 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxx)
and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xli). Ohio also made a spelling correction in
OAC 3745-31-09(H)(2)(d). Therefore we propose to approve this rule.
OAC 3745-31-10 Air Stationary Source Obligations
Ohio has added the source obligations in 40 CFR 51.166 (r). Ohio
doesn't include the requirements of 70.4(b)(3)(vii). Ohio also adds the
language ``if any provision of OAC 3745-31-10 through 3745-31-32 or the
application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held
invalid, the remainder of this section, or the application of such
provision to persons or circumstances other then those as to which it
is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.'' EPA proposes to
approve these changes.
OAC 3745-31-13 Attainment Provisions--Review of Major Stationary
Sources and Major Modifications, Stationary Source Applicability and
Exemptions
Ohio has modified OAC 3745-31-13 (B) and (G) to replace the phrase
``air pollutant subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act that the
stationary source would emit, except for air pollutants listed under
112 of the Clean Air Act'' and ``air pollutant subject to regulation
under the Clean Air Act'' respectively with ``regulated NSR
pollutant''. This is consistent with 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xxxvii). Ohio also modified OAC 3745-31-13(D)(2)(d) by
replacing the term ``reviewing authority'' with ``director,'' and OAC
3745-31-13(H) by clarifying that the units of measure are [mu]g/m\3\,
and removing mercury, beryllium, and vinyl chloride. This is consistent
with 40 CFR 51.166(i). Therefore we propose to approve this rule.
OAC 3745-31-15 Attainment Provisions--Control Technology Review
Ohio has modified OAC 3745-31-15(B) to include references to 40 CFR
part 63 and OAC 3745-31-1 (C), and (D) to replace the phrase ``air
pollutant subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act excluding
pollutants regulated due to being listed under Section 112 of the Clean
Air Act'' and ``air pollutant
[[Page 24739]]
subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act'' with ``regulated NSR
pollutant.'' This is consistent with 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49) and 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(xxxvii). Therefore we propose to approve this rule.
OAC 3745-31-21 Nonattainment Provisions
Ohio has modified OAC 3745-31-21 (B) to replace the phrase ``air
pollutant subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act'' with
``regulated NSR pollutant''. This is consistent with 40 CFR
51.166(b)(49) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxxvii). Ohio also added language
to OAC 3745-31-21 (E) to clarify that projects referenced therein are
clean coal technology demonstration projects, and that ``Section 111
and Part C'' refer to Section 111 and Part C of the Clean Air Act. EPA
proposes to approve these changes.
OAC 3745-31-22 Nonattainment Provisions--Conditions for Approval
In addition to grammatical updates to OAC 3745-31-22, Ohio has
established OAC 3745-31-22(A)(3)(e) and (f) not permitting decreases
from actual emissions from the installation of add-on control
technology or application of pollution prevention measures and clean
units or pollution control projects except as provided by the rule.
This language is consistent with 40 CFR 51.165(a)(3)(ii)(H) and (I).
Ohio also established OAC 3745-31-22(A)(3)(g) providing the offset
requirements for increased emissions from major modifications. This
language is consistent with 40 CFR 51.165(a)(3)(ii)(J). Therefore we
propose to approve this rule.
OAC 3745-31-24 Non-Attainment Provisions--Baseline for Determining
Credit for Emission and Air Quality Offsets
In addition to grammatical updates to OAC 3745-31-24(A), (E) and
(H), Ohio has established rules for establishing a baseline for
determining credit for emission reductions in OAC 3745-31-24(B) and
(C). This language is consistent with 40 CFR 51.165(a)(3)(i) and
(ii)(A). Ohio has removed language describing the baseline time period
and calculation of baseline emissions which primarily refer to the most
recent two year period as the basis for the baseline. The federal
program no longer has such a requirement.
Ohio also established OAC 3745-31-24(K) which requires all emission
reductions claimed as offset credit to be federally enforceable. This
language is consistent with 40 CFR 51.165(a)(3)(ii)(E). Therefore we
propose to approve this rule.
OAC 3745-31-26 Nonattainment Provisions--Offset Ratio Requirements
Ohio has modified the VOC offset requirement provision in OAC 3745-
31-26(A) to include an offset ratio for unclassified areas of greater
than 1.0 to 1.0. This language is consistent with section 173(c) of the
Clean Air Act. Therefore we propose to approve this rule.
OAC 3745-31-30 Clean Units
Ohio has added a new rule section for emission units that are
subject to BACT or LAER and qualify for a clean unit designation. These
rules, for the most part, are consistent with provisions at 40 CFR
51.166(t) and (u) and 40 CFR 51.165(c) and (d) for clean units.
However, although Ohio intended only LAER to apply in nonattainment
areas, as drafted, OAC 3745-31-30 is not clear that a LAER
determination is required for a clean unit designation in an existing
nonattainment area. The language in OAC 3745-31-30(A)(5)(a) must also
include current-day LAER requirements for non-attainment areas, in
addition to BACT for attainment areas.
In a March 2, 2005 letter to EPA, OEPA has committed to clarify its
rules in this regard, and, until the rule is clarified, the
conditionally approved rules will be implemented as requiring a LAER
determination in nonattainment areas in order to obtain a clean unit
designation. Therefore we propose to conditionally approve this rule.
OAC 3745-31-31 Pollution Control Project
OAC 3745-31-31 establishes a pollution control project exclusion
provision in Ohio's permit to install regulations. This addition to
Ohio's rule is consistent with the requirements in 40 CFR 51.166(v) and
40 CFR 51.165(e). Therefore we propose to approve this rule.
OAC 3745-31-32 Plantwide Applicability Limit (PAL)
This section of the Ohio permit to install rules regarding PAL
applicability is consistent with 40 CFR 51.166(w) and 40 CFR 51.165(f).
Therefore we propose to approve this rule.
III. Conditional Approval
A. Why are we proposing to conditionally approve Ohio's rules?
We are proposing to conditionally approve Ohio's permit to install
rules, OAC 3745-31-30. These rules, for the most part, fulfill part C
of title I of the CAA by incorporating the critical provisions at 40
CFR 51.165 and 51.166 for clean units. However, although Ohio intended
only LAER to apply in nonattainment areas, the proposed language of OAC
3745-31-30 does not make clear that a LAER determination is required
for a clean unit designation in an existing nonattainment area. In
addition to BACT for attainment areas, the language in OAC 3745-31-
30(A)(5)(a) must also include current-day LAER requirements for non-
attainment areas.
OEPA has committed, in a March 2, 2005 letter, to clarify its rules
in this regard and, in the interim, to require a LAER determination in
nonattainment areas in order to obtain a clean unit designation.
Because OAC 3745-31-30 meets all requirements of 40 CFR 51.165 and
51.166 for clean units with the exceptions noted above, and because
OEPA has committed to correct the deficiencies, we believe that it is
appropriate to propose to conditionally approve these rules. Once OEPA
submits the rule changes to address these deficiencies, we can take
action to fully approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision.
B. How can this conditional approval become fully approved?
OEPA will have one year from the time that the conditional approval
is final to submit the necessary changes to its rules to correct the
deficiencies identified in this action. If OEPA does not submit changes
within the one year timeframe, this conditional approval will
automatically revert to a disapproval of the Ohio SIP.
C. What are the ramifications for not submitting the necessary changes?
If OEPA fails to submit the necessary rule changes to us, final
conditional approval will automatically convert to a disapproval. EPA
would confirm such disapproval to the State by letter. If the SIP
becomes disapproved, these commitments will no longer be a part of the
approved SIP. We would subsequently publish a notice to this effect in
the notice section of the Federal Register indicating that the
commitment or commitments have been disapproved and removed from the
SIP. If OEPA adopts and submits the final rule amendments to EPA within
the applicable time frame, the conditionally approved commitments will
remain part of the SIP until the EPA takes final action approving or
disapproving the new submittal, those newly approved rules will become
part of the SIP.
If after considering the comments on the subsequent submittal, we
issue a
[[Page 24740]]
final disapproval, the sanctions clock under 179(a) will begin. If OEPA
does not submit and we do not approve the rule on which any disapproval
is based within 18 months of the disapproval, we must impose one of the
sanctions under section 179(b) highway funding restrictions or the
offset sanction. In addition, any final disapproval would start the 24-
month clock for the imposition of section 110(c) Federal Implementation
Plan. Finally, under section 110(m) the EPA has discretionary authority
to impose sanctions at any time after final disapproval.
IV. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?
EPA is proposing conditional approval of Ohio permit to install
revisions. On December 31, 2002, EPA published revisions to the federal
PSD and NSR regulations in 40 CFR parts 51 and 52 (67 FR 80186). These
``NSR Reform'' regulatory revisions became effective on March 3, 2003,
and include provisions for baseline emissions determinations, actual-
to-future actual methodology, plantwide applicability limits (PALs),
clean units, and pollution control projects (PCPs). EPA is proposing to
conditionally approve OEPA's revised rules to implement these NSR
Reform provisions.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Executive Order 12866; Regulatory Planning and Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget.
Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
Because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866 or a ``significant energy action,'' this action
is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed action merely proposes to approve State law as
meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by State law. Accordingly, the Administrator
certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Because this rule proposes to approve pre-existing requirements
under State law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty
beyond that required by State law, it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-
4).
Executive Order 13175 Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This proposed rule also does not have tribal implications because
it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (59 FR 22951, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 13132 Federalism
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it
does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This action merely proposes to approve a State rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act.
Executive Order 13045 Protection of Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
This proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
National Technology Transfer Advancement Act
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose an information collection burden
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: April 29, 2005.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 05-9403 Filed 5-10-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P