Sentencing Guidelines for United States Courts, 24852-24856 [05-9378]
Download as PDF
24852
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 11, 2005 / Notices
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.15
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2005–22 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549–0609.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2005–22. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Phlx. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2005–22 and should
be submitted on or before June 1, 2005.
15 See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C). For purposes of
calculation the 60-day abrogation period, the
Commission considers the period to commence on
May 4, 2005, the date the Phlx filed Amendment
No. 2.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:48 May 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–2306 Filed 5–10–05; 8:45 am]
the proposed amendments in
Washington, DC, on April 12, 2005. On
April 29, 2005, the Commission
submitted these amendments to
Congress and specified an effective date
of November 1, 2005.
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 994(a), (o), and (p);
USSC Rule of Practice and Procedure 4.1.
UNITED STATES SENTENCING
COMMISSION
Sentencing Guidelines for United
States Courts
United States Sentencing
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of submission to
Congress of amendments to the
sentencing guidelines effective
November 1, 2005.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to its authority
under 28 U.S.C. 994(p), the Commission
has promulgated amendments to the
sentencing guidelines, policy
statements, commentary, and statutory
index. This notice sets forth the
amendments and the reason for each
amendment.
DATES: The Commission has specified
an effective date of November 1, 2005,
for the amendments set forth in this
notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Courlander, Public Affairs
Officer, 202–502–4590. The
amendments set forth in this notice also
may be accessed through the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.ussc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Sentencing Commission is
an independent agency in the judicial
branch of the United States
Government. The Commission
promulgates sentencing guidelines and
policy statements for Federal sentencing
courts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a). The
Commission also periodically reviews
and revises previously promulgated
guidelines pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o)
and generally submits guideline
amendments to Congress pursuant to 28
U.S.C. 994(p) not later than the first day
of May each year. Absent action of
Congress to the contrary, submitted
amendments become effective by
operation of law on the date specified
by the Commission (generally November
1 of the year in which the amendments
are submitted to Congress).
Notice of proposed amendments was
published in the Federal Register on
February 23, 2005 (see 70 FR 8868). The
Commission held a public hearing on
PO 00000
16 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Ricardo H. Hinojosa,
Chair.
1. Amendment: Chapter Two, Part B,
Subpart 1 is amended by adding at the
end the following new guideline and
accompanying commentary:
‘‘§ 2B1.6. Aggravated Identity Theft
(a) If the defendant was convicted of
violating 18 U.S.C. 1028A, the guideline
sentence is the term of imprisonment
required by statute. Chapters Three
(Adjustments) and Four (Criminal
History and Criminal Livelihood) shall
not apply to that count of conviction.
Commentary
Statutory Provision: 18 U.S.C. 1028A.
For additional statutory provision(s), see
Appendix A (Statutory Index).
Application Notes
1. Imposition of Sentence.—
(A) In General.—Section 1028A of
title 18, United States Code, provides a
mandatory term of imprisonment.
Accordingly, the guideline sentence for
a defendant convicted under 18 U.S.C.
1028A is the term required by that
statute. Except as provided in
subdivision (B), 18 U.S.C. 1028A also
requires a term of imprisonment
imposed under this section to run
consecutively to any other term of
imprisonment.
(B) Multiple Convictions Under
Section 1028A.—Section 1028A(b)(4) of
title 18, United States Code, provides
that in the case of multiple convictions
under 18 U.S.C. 1028A, the terms of
imprisonment imposed on such counts
may, in the discretion of the court, run
concurrently, in whole or in part, with
each other. See the Commentary to
§ 5G1.2 (Sentencing on Multiple Counts
of Conviction) for guidance regarding
imposition of sentence on multiple
counts of 18 U.S.C. 1028A.
2. Inapplicability of Chapter Two
Enhancement.—If a sentence under this
guideline is imposed in conjunction
with a sentence for an underlying
offense, do not apply any specific
offense characteristic for the transfer,
possession, or use of a means of
identification when determining the
sentence for the underlying offense. A
sentence under this guideline accounts
for this factor for the underlying offense
of conviction, including any such
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 11, 2005 / Notices
enhancement that would apply based on
conduct for which the defendant is
accountable under § 1B1.3 (Relevant
Conduct). ‘Means of identification’ has
the meaning given that term in 18 U.S.C.
1028(d)(7).
3. Inapplicability of Chapters Three
and Four.—Do not apply Chapters Three
(Adjustments) and Four (Criminal
History and Criminal Livelihood) to any
offense sentenced under this guideline.
Such offenses are excluded from
application of those chapters because
the guideline sentence for each offense
is determined only by the relevant
statute. See §§ 3D1.1 (Procedure for
Determining Offense Level on Multiple
Counts) and 5G1.2.’’.
The Commentary to § 3B1.3 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 1 by inserting ‘‘Definition of
‘Public or Private Trust’.—’’ before
‘‘ ‘Public or private trust’ refers to’’, and
by striking the second paragraph; by
redesignating Notes 2 through 4 as
Notes 3 through 5, respectively; and by
inserting after Note 1 the following:
‘‘2. Application of Adjustment in
Certain Circumstances.—
Notwithstanding Application Note 1, or
any other provision of this guideline, an
adjustment under this guideline shall
apply to the following:
(A) An employee of the United States
Postal Service who engages in the theft
or destruction of undelivered United
States mail.
(B) A defendant who exceeds or
abuses the authority of his or her
position in order to obtain unlawfully,
or use without authority, any means of
identification. ‘Means of identification’
has the meaning given that term in 18
U.S.C. 1028(d)(7). The following are
examples to which this subdivision
would apply: (i) An employee of a state
motor vehicle department who exceeds
or abuses the authority of his or her
position by knowingly issuing a driver’s
license based on false, incomplete, or
misleading information; (ii) a hospital
orderly who exceeds or abuses the
authority of his or her position by
obtaining or misusing patient
identification information from a patient
chart; and (iii) a volunteer at a
charitable organization who exceeds or
abuses the authority of his or her
position by obtaining or misusing
identification information from a
donor’s file.’’.
Section 3D1.1 is amended by striking
subsection (b) and inserting the
following:
‘‘(b) Exclude from the application of
§§ 3D1.2–3D1.5 the following:
(1) Any count for which the statute
(A) specifies a term of imprisonment to
be imposed; and (B) requires that such
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:48 May 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
term of imprisonment be imposed to run
consecutively to any other term of
imprisonment. Sentences for such
counts are governed by the provisions of
§ 5G1.2(a).
(2) Any count of conviction under 18
U.S.C. 1028A. See Application Note
2(B) of the Commentary to § 5G1.2
(Sentencing on Multiple Counts of
Conviction) for guidance on how
sentences for multiple counts of
conviction under 18 U.S.C. 1028A
should be imposed.’’.
The Commentary to § 5G1.2 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 2 by inserting ‘‘(A) In General.’’—
before ‘‘Subsection (a) applies’’; by
inserting ‘‘and 18 U.S.C. 1028A
(requiring a mandatory term of
imprisonment of either two or five
years, based on the conduct involved,
and also requiring, except in the
circumstances described in subdivision
(B), the sentence imposed to run
consecutively to any other term of
imprisonment)’’ after ‘‘imprisonment)’’;
by striking ‘‘Note, however,’’ and all
that follows through ‘‘§ 3624(e).’’; and
by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(B) Multiple Convictions Under 18
U.S.C. 1028A.—Section 1028A of title
18, United States Code, generally
requires that the mandatory term of
imprisonment for a violation of such
section be imposed consecutively to any
other term of imprisonment. However,
18 U.S.C. 1028A(b)(4) permits the court,
in its discretion, to impose the
mandatory term of imprisonment on a
defendant for a violation of such section
‘‘concurrently, in whole or in part, only
with another term of imprisonment that
is imposed by the court at the same time
on that person for an additional
violation of this section, provided that
such discretion shall be exercised in
accordance with any applicable
guidelines and policy statements issued
by the Sentencing Commission * * *’’.
In determining whether multiple
counts of 18 U.S.C. 1028A should run
concurrently with, or consecutively to,
each other, the court should consider
the following non-exhaustive list of
factors:
(i) The nature and seriousness of the
underlying offenses. For example, the
court should consider the
appropriateness of imposing
consecutive, or partially consecutive,
terms of imprisonment for multiple
counts of 18 U.S.C. 1028A in a case in
which an underlying offense for one of
the 18 U.S.C. 1028A offenses is a crime
of violence or an offense enumerated in
18 U.S.C. 2332b(g)(5)(B).
(ii) Whether the underlying offenses
are groupable under § 3D1.2 (Multiple
Counts). Generally, multiple counts of
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24853
18 U.S.C. 1028A should run
concurrently with one another in cases
in which the underlying offenses are
groupable under § 3D1.2.
(iii) Whether the purposes of
sentencing set forth in 18 U.S.C.
3553(a)(2) are better achieved by
imposing a concurrent or a consecutive
sentence for multiple counts of 18
U.S.C. 1028A.
(C) Imposition of Supervised
Release.—In the case of a consecutive
term of imprisonment imposed under
subsection (a), any term of supervised
release imposed is to run concurrently
with any other term of supervised
release imposed.
See 18 U.S.C. 3624(e).’’.
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is
amended by inserting after the line
referenced to 18 U.S.C. 1028 the
following:
‘‘18 U.S.C. 1028A 2B1.6’’.
Reason for Amendment: This
amendment implements sections 2 and
5 of the Identity Theft Penalty
Enhancement Act, Public Law 108–275,
118 Stat. 831 (‘‘the Act’’), which create
two new criminal offenses at 18 U.S.C.
1028A and direct the Sentencing
Commission to expand the upward
adjustment at § 3B1.3 (Abuse of Position
of Trust/Special Skill). This amendment
also provides guidance to the courts on
imposing sentences for multiple
violations of section 1028A.
The Act creates a new offense at 18
U.S.C. 1028A(a)(1) that prohibits the
unauthorized transfer, use, or
possession of a means of identification
of another person during, or in relation
to, specific enumerated felonies. These
felonies consist of various types of
fraud, including mail and wire fraud in
connection with passports, visas and
other immigration, nationality, and
citizenship laws, programs under the
Social Security Act, and the acquisition
of firearms. A conviction under section
1028A(a)(1) carries a two-year
mandatory term of imprisonment that
must run consecutively to any other
term of imprisonment, including the
sentence for the underlying felony
conviction. The Act also creates a new
offense at 18 U.S.C. 1028A(b)(1) that
prohibits the unauthorized transfer, use,
or possession of a means of
identification of another person during,
or in relation to, specific felonies
enumerated in 18 U.S.C. 2332b(g)(5)(B)
(‘‘federal crimes of terrorism’’). Section
1028A(b)(1) provides a five-year
mandatory term of imprisonment that
must run consecutively to any other
term of imprisonment, including the
sentence for the underlying felony
conviction. As described below, section
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
24854
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 11, 2005 / Notices
1028A(b)(4) creates an exception to the
requirement for consecutive terms of
imprisonment in cases involving
multiple violations of the statute
sentenced at the same time.
First, in response to the creation of
these new criminal offenses, the
amendment creates a new guideline at
§ 2B1.6 (Aggravated Identity Theft). This
guideline is patterned after § 2K2.4 (Use
of a Firearm, Armor-Piercing
Ammunition, or Explosive During or in
Relation to a Certain Crimes). Because
the new offenses carry a fixed,
mandatory consecutive term of
imprisonment, the new guideline, as
does § 2K2.4, provides that the
guideline sentence is the term of
imprisonment required by statute. To
avoid unwarranted double-counting, the
amendment contains an application
note that prohibits the application of
any specific offense characteristic for
the transfer, possession, or use of a
means of identification when
determining the sentence for the
underlying offense in cases in which a
sentence under § 2B1.6 is imposed in
conjunction with a sentence for an
underlying offense. Also, consistent
with § 2K2.4, the new guideline at
§ 2B1.6 contains an application note
that provides that adjustments under
Chapters Three and Four are
inapplicable to sentences under this
guideline.
Second, in response to the directive in
section 5 to amend § 3B1.3 (Abuse of
Trust or Use of Special Skill) to include
a ‘‘defendant [who] exceeds or abuses
the authority of his or her position in
order to obtain unlawfully or use
without authority any means of
identification,’’ the Commission created
Application Note 2 to § 3B1.3 to include
such defendants within the scope of the
guideline. The application note contains
several examples to illustrate the types
of conduct intended to be within the
scope of the new provision.
Third, the amendment adds a number
of provisions at appropriate guidelines
in order to provide guidance to courts
in accordance with section 2 of the Act
(18 U.S.C. 1028A(b)(4)). That section
states that ‘‘a term of imprisonment
imposed on a person for violation of this
section may, in the discretion of the
court, run concurrently, in whole or in
part, only with another term of
imprisonment that is imposed by the
court at the same time on that person for
an additional violation of this section,
provided that such discretion shall be
exercised in accordance with any
applicable guidelines and policy
statements issued by the Sentencing
Commission * * *.’’ The amendment
states a general rule, at § 5G1.2
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:48 May 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
(Sentencing on Multiple Counts of
Conviction), Application Note 2(B),
providing that the court has discretion
to impose concurrent or consecutive, or
partially concurrent and partially
consecutive, terms of imprisonment for
multiple violations of 18 U.S.C. 1028A.
A non-exhaustive list of factors for
courts to consider in making this
determination is provided, including
the nature and seriousness of the
underlying offenses and whether the
offenses would be groupable under
§ 3D1.2 (Multiple Counts).
Finally, the amendment modifies
§ 3D1.1 (Procedure for Determining
Offense Level on Multiple Counts) to
make clear that section 1028A offenses
are excluded from the general grouping
rules in §§ 3D1.2–3D1.5 and makes
conforming additions and changes to
the new guideline at § 2B1.6
(Aggravated Identity Theft) in
Application Note 1 and § 3D1.1(b)(1)
and (2).
2. Amendment: Section 2R1.1(a) is
amended by striking ‘‘10’’ and inserting
‘‘12’’.
Section 2R1.1(b) is amended by
striking subdivision (2) and inserting
the following:
‘‘(2) If the volume of commerce
attributable to the defendant was more
than $1,000,000, adjust the offense level
as follows:
Volume of commerce (apply
the greatest)
Adjustment to
offense level
(A) More than $1,000,000 .....
(B) More than $10,000,000 ...
(C) More than $40,000,000 ..
(D) More than $100,000,000
(E) More than $250,000,000
(F) More than $500,000,000
(G) More than
$1,000,000,000.
(H) More than
$1,500,000,000.
add
add
add
add
add
add
add
2.
4.
6.
8.
10.
12.
14.
add 16.
For purposes of this guideline, the
volume of commerce attributable to an
individual participant in a conspiracy is
the volume of commerce done by him
or his principal in goods or services that
were affected by the violation. When
multiple counts or conspiracies are
involved, the volume of commerce
should be treated cumulatively to
determine a single, combined offense
level.’’.
The Commentary to § 2R1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended by
striking Note 1 and inserting the
following:
‘‘1. Application of Chapter Three
(Adjustments).—Sections 3B1.1
(Aggravating Role), 3B1.2 (Mitigating
Role), 3B1.3 (Abuse of Position of Trust
or Use of Special Skill), and 3C1.1
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(Obstructing or Impeding the
Administration of Justice) may be
relevant in determining the seriousness
of the defendant’s offense. For example,
if a sales manager organizes or leads the
price-fixing activity of five or more
participants, the 4-level increase at
§ 3B1.1(a) should be applied to reflect
the defendant’s aggravated role in the
offense. For purposes of applying
§ 3B1.2, an individual defendant should
be considered for a mitigating role
adjustment only if he were responsible
in some minor way for his firm’s
participation in the conspiracy.’’.
The Commentary to § 2R1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 2 by striking the first sentence and
inserting the following:
‘‘Considerations in Setting Fine for
Individuals.—In setting the fine for
individuals, the court should consider
the extent of the defendant’s
participation in the offense, the
defendant’s role, and the degree to
which the defendant personally profited
from the offense (including salary,
bonuses, and career enhancement).’’.
The Commentary to § 2R1.1 captioned
‘‘Background’’ is amended in the second
paragraph by striking the ‘‘The
Commission’’ and all that follows
through ‘‘general deterrence.’’; in the
third paragraph by striking
‘‘confinement of six months or longer’’
and inserting ‘‘some period of
confinement’’; and in the last paragraph
by striking the last sentence.
Reason for Amendment: This
amendment responds to the Antitrust
Criminal Penalty Enhancement and
Reform Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108–237
(the ‘‘Act’’). The Act increased the
statutory maximum term of
imprisonment for antitrust offenses
under 15 U.S.C. 1 and 3(b) from three
to ten years. The amendment responds
to congressional concern about the
seriousness of antitrust offenses and
provides for antitrust penalties that are
more proportionate to those for
sophisticated frauds sentenced under
§ 2B1.1 (Larceny, Embezzlement, and
Other Forms of Theft; Offenses
Involving Stolen Property; Property
Damage or Destruction; Fraud and
Deceit; Forgery; Offenses Involving
Altered or Counterfeit Instruments
Other than Counterfeit Bearer
Obligations of the United States). The
Commission has long recognized the
similarity of antitrust offenses to
sophisticated frauds.
The amendment increases the base
offense level for antitrust offenses in
§ 2R1.1 (Bid-Rigging, Price-Fixing or
Market-Allocation Agreements Among
Competitors) to level 12. The higher
base offense level ensures that penalties
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 11, 2005 / Notices
for antitrust offenses will be coextensive
with those for sophisticated frauds
sentenced under § 2B1.1 and recognizes
congressional concern about the
inherent seriousness of antitrust
offenses. The penalties for sophisticated
fraud have been increased incrementally
due to a series of amendments to
§ 2B1.1, while no commensurate
increases for antitrust offenses had
occurred. Raising the base offense level
of § 2R1.1 helps restore the historic
proportionality in the treatment of
antitrust offenses and sophisticated
frauds.
The ‘‘volume of commerce’’ table at
§ 2R1.1(b)(2) is amended to provide up
to 16 additional offense levels for the
defendant whose offense involves more
than $1,500,000,000, while the new
table’s first threshold is raised from
$400,000 to $1,000,000. The new
volume of commerce table: (1)
Recognizes the depreciation in the value
of the dollar since the table was last
revised in 1991; (2) responds to data
indicating that the financial magnitude
of antitrust offenses has increased
significantly; and (3) provides greater
deterrence of large scale price-fixing
crimes.
Application Note 1 to § 2R1.1 is
amended to emphasize the potential
relevance of such Chapter Three
enhancements as § 3B1.1 (Aggravating
Role), § 3B1.3 (Abuse of Position of
Trust or Use of Special Skill), and
§ 3C1.1 (Obstructing or Impeding the
Administration of Justice) in
determining the appropriate sentence
for an antitrust offender. Application
Note 2 also is amended to highlight the
potential relevance of the defendant’s
role in the offense in determining the
amount of fine to be imposed. Finally,
the amendment strikes outdated
background commentary.
3. Amendment: Section 2A2.4 is
amended by striking the Commentary
captioned ‘‘Background’’.
The Commentary to § 2B1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 15 in the first sentence by inserting
‘‘involving fraudulent conduct that is’’
after ‘‘establishes an offense’’; and in the
second sentence by inserting ‘‘involves
fraudulent conduct that’’ after ‘‘the
offense’’.
Section 2B3.3(c)(1) is amended by
inserting ‘‘; Fraud Involving the
Deprivation of the Intangible Right to
Honest Services of Public Officials;
Conspiracy to Defraud by Interference
with Governmental Functions’’ after
‘‘Official Right’’.
Section 2C1.3(c)(1) is amended by
inserting ‘‘; Fraud Involving the
Deprivation of the Intangible Right to
Honest Services of Public Officials;
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:48 May 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
Conspiracy to Defraud by Interference
with Governmental Functions’’ after
‘‘Official Right’’.
Section 2C1.8(c)(1) is amended by
inserting ‘‘; Fraud Involving the
Deprivation of the Intangible Right to
Honest Services of Public Officials;
Conspiracy to Defraud by Interference
with Governmental Functions’’ after
‘‘Official Right’’.
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 5 in the first paragraph by striking
‘‘whether a greater quantity of the
analogue is needed to produce a
substantially similar effect on the
central nervous system as’’ and inserting
‘‘whether the same quantity of analogue
produces a greater effect on the central
nervous system than’’.
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 19 by striking ‘‘(b)(5)(A)’’ each
place it appears and inserting
‘‘(b)(6)(A)’’; in Note 20 by striking
‘‘(b)(5)(B) or (C)’’ and inserting ‘‘(b)(6)(B)
or (C)’’; and by striking ‘‘(b)(5)(C)’’ and
inserting ‘‘(b)(6)(C)’’; and in Note 21 by
striking ‘‘(b)(6)’’ each place it appears
and inserting ‘‘(b)(7)’’.
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Background’’ is amended in the ninth
paragraph by striking ‘‘(b)(5)(A)’’ and
inserting ‘‘(b)(6)(A)’’; in the last
paragraph and by striking ‘‘(b)(5)(B) and
(C)’’ and inserting ‘‘(b)(6)(B) and (C)’’.
Section 2D1.11(e) is amended in
subdivision (1) by striking ‘‘2271 L or
more of Gamma-butyrolactone;’’ and
inserting ‘‘1135.5 L or more of Gammabutyrolactone;’’;
in subdivision (2) by striking ‘‘At least
681.3 L but less than 2271 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’ and inserting ‘‘At least
340.7 L but less than 1135.5 L of
Gamma-butyrolactone;’’;
in subdivision (3) by striking ‘‘At least
227.1 L but less than 681.3 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’ and inserting ‘‘At least
113.6 L but less than 340.7 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’;
in subdivision (4) by striking ‘‘At least
159 L but less than 227.1 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’ and inserting ‘‘At least
79.5 L but less than 113.6 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’;
in subdivision (5) by striking ‘‘At least
90.8 L but less than 159 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’ and inserting ‘‘At least
45.4 L but less than 79.5 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’;
in subdivision (6) by striking ‘‘At least
22.7 L but less than 90.8 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’ and inserting ‘‘At least
11.4 L but less than 45.4 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’;
in subdivision (7) by striking ‘‘At least
18.2 L but less than 22.7 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’ and inserting ‘‘At least
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24855
9.1 L but less than 11.4 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’;
in subdivision (8) by striking ‘‘At least
13.6 L but less than 18.2 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’ and inserting ‘‘At least
6.8 L but less than 9.1 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’;
in subdivision (9) by striking ‘‘At least
9.1 L but less than 13.6 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’ and inserting ‘‘At least
4.5 L but less than 6.8 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’;
and in subdivision (10) by striking
‘‘Less than 9.1 L of Gammabutyrolactone;’’ and inserting ‘‘Less than
4.5 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;’’.
The Commentary to § 2K2.1 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
striking ‘‘(e)–(i), (k)–(o)’’ and inserting
‘‘(e)–(h), (j)–(n)’’.
Section 2M6.1 is amended by striking
‘‘(a)(4)*’’ in subsection (b)(1)(A) and
inserting ‘‘(a)(4)(A)’’; and by striking
‘‘*Note: The reference to ‘‘(a)(4)’’ should
be to ‘‘(a)(4)(A)’.’’.
Section 3D1.2(d) is amended by
striking ‘‘2C1.7,’’.
The Commentary to § 5D1.2 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 2 by inserting ‘‘Limitation on’’
before ‘‘Applicability of Statutory’’.
Section 8C2.1(a) is amended by
striking ‘‘, 2C1.7’’.
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is
amended by striking the following:
‘‘18 U.S.C. 924(i) 2K2.1
18 U.S.C. 924(j)(1) 2A1.1, 2A1.2
18 U.S.C. 924(j)(2) 2A1.3, 2A1.4
18 U.S.C. 924(k)–(o) 2K2.1’’,
and inserting the following:
‘‘18 U.S.C. 924(i)(1) 2A1.1, 2A1.2
18 U.S.C. 924(i)(2) 2A1.3, 2A1.4
18 U.S.C. 924(j)–(n) 2K2.1’’.
Reason for Amendment: This ten-part
amendment consists of technical and
conforming amendments to various
guidelines.
First, this amendment deletes
unnecessary background commentary in
§ 2A2.4 (Obstructing or Impeding
Officers).
Second, this amendment makes minor
clarifying amendments to Application
Note 15 in the fraud guideline, § 2B1.1,
to make clear that, in order for the cross
reference at § 2B1.1(c)(3) to apply, the
conduct set forth in the count of
conviction must establish a fraud or
false statement-type offense.
Third, this amendment makes
technical amendments to several
guidelines to conform to changes made
in the public corruption guidelines in
the 2004 amendment cycle (see
Appendix C to the Guidelines Manual,
Amendment 666). Specifically, the
proposed amendment corrects title
references to § 2C1.1 in §§ 2B3.3(c)(1),
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
24856
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 11, 2005 / Notices
2C1.3(c)(1), and 2C1.8(c)(1) and strikes
references to § 2C1.7 in §§ 3D1.2(d) and
8C2.1.
Fourth, this amendment clarifies
Application Note 5 in the drug
guideline, § 2D1.1, regarding drug
analogues. The current note suggests
that drug analogues are less potent than
the drug for which it is an analogue.
However, by statute, analogues can only
be the same or more potent.
Fifth, this amendment redesignates
incorrect references in a number of
Application Notes in the drug guideline,
§ 2D1.1.
Sixth, this amendment conforms
§ 2D1.11 (Unlawfully Distributing,
Importing, Exporting or Possessing a
Listed Chemical; Attempt or
Conspiracy) to changes made in the
drug guideline, § 2D1.1, in the 2004
amendment cycle (see Appendix C to
the Guidelines Manual, Amendment
667). Specifically, the proposed
amendment amends the Chemical
Quantity Table in § 2D1.11(e) so that the
amount of gamma-butyrolactone (GBL),
at any particular offense level, is the
amount that provides a 100 percent
yield of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid
(GHB).
Seventh, this amendment updates the
statutory provisions in § 2K2.1
(Unlawful Receipt, Possession, or
Transportation of Firearms or
Ammunition; Prohibited Transactions
Involving Firearms or Ammunition) to
account for redesignations of 18 U.S.C.
924 offenses.
Eighth, this amendment corrects a
typographical error in § 2M6.1
(Weapons of Mass Destruction).
Ninth, this amendment corrects the
title to § 5C1.2 (Limitation on
Applicability of Statutory Minimum
Sentence in Certain Cases) in
Application Note 2 of § 5D1.2 (Terms of
Supervised Release.).
Tenth, this amendment corrects
Appendix A (Statutory Index) to
account for redesignations of 18 U.S.C.
924 offenses.
[FR Doc. 05–9378 Filed 5–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2211–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Disaster Declaration #10111 and
#10112
[Pennsylvania Disaster Number PA–00001]
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Amendment 1.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the
Presidential declaration of a major
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:48 May 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
disaster for the State of Pennsylvania
(FEMA–1587–DR), dated 4/14/2005.
Incident: Flooding.
Incident Period: 4/2/2005 through
4/23/2005.
EFFECTIVE DATE: 4/23/2005.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 6/14/2005.
EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:
1/9/2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to U.S. Small Business
Administration, Disaster Area Office 1,
360 Rainbow Blvd., South 3rd Floor,
Niagara Falls, NY 14303.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington,
DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice
of the President’s major disaster
declaration for Pennsylvania, dated
4/14/2005, is hereby amended to
establish the incident period for this
disaster as beginning 4/02/2005 and
continuing through 4/23/2005.
All other information in the original
declaration remains unchanged.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008.)
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05–9377 Filed 5–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Environmental Impact Statement on
Transit Improvements in the Northwest
Corridor to Irving/DFW in Dallas, TX
AGENCY:
Federal Transit Administration,
DOT.
Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) and Dallas Area
Rapid Transit (DART) issue this notice
to advise interested agencies and the
public of their intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
on the proposed Northwest CorridorIrving/DFW Line Light Rail Transit
(LRT) Project in Dallas and Irving,
Texas. The EIS will be prepared in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as
amended.
The Northwest Corridor-Irving/DFW
Line LRT project is the product of the
Northwest Corridor Major Investment
Study (MIS) completed by DART in
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
early 2000. The MIS identified a Locally
Preferred Investment Strategy (LPIS),
which included a light rail element with
two service lines, the Carrollton Line
and the Irving/DFW Line. An EIS
evaluating alternatives for the Carrollton
Line has been completed, and FTA
issued a Record of Decision on this
portion of the LPIS on February 5, 2004.
The identified primary travel need for
the Northwest Corridor-Irving/DFW
Line LRT is to serve the general
northwest-southeast travel pattern along
the Interstate Highway (IH) 35E/State
Highway (SH) 114 corridor from
downtown Dallas into North Irving. The
LPIS alignment addressed this need
with an alignment that generally
parallels SH 114 through north Irving
before terminating on the north side of
SH 114, west of Beltline Road.
After adoption of the LPIS, significant
changes in land use and transportation
patterns have occurred in the Irving/
DFW Corridor. Subsequent analyses by
DART for the Irving/DFW Corridor have
resulted in a refinement to the LPIS
alignment. The refined alignment also
addresses the primary travel need with
an alignment that runs parallel but
south of SH 114 through north Irving.
Both of these ‘‘Build’’ alternatives will
be fully evaluated in the EIS.
DATES: Comment due date: Written
comments on the scope of the EIS,
including the alternatives and impacts
to be considered, should be sent to John
Hoppie, Project Manager by July 1,
2005. See ADDRESSES below.
Scoping Meeting: A Public Scoping
Meeting will be held June 29, 2005, at
6:30 p.m. at the University of Dallas—
Haggar University Center, 1845 E.
Northgate Drive, Irving, Texas. The
meeting will be accessible to persons
with disabilities. Individuals requiring
special assistance to participate fully,
such as a translator or sign-language
interpreter, should notify DART in
advance as indicated under ADDRESSES
below.
Interagency Coordination Meeting:
DART will invite all federal, state and
local agencies with a possible interest in
any aspect of the proposed project or its
impacts to an interagency coordination
meeting and will provide scoping
materials to these agencies prior to that
meeting. The likely cooperating
agencies include the Federal Aviation
Administration, the Transportation
Security Administration, and North
Central Texas Council of Governments
(NCTCOG).
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to John Hoppie, Project Manager,
Dallas Area Rapid Transit, P.O Box
660163, Dallas, Texas 75266–7213.
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 11, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24852-24856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-9378]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION
Sentencing Guidelines for United States Courts
AGENCY: United States Sentencing Commission.
ACTION: Notice of submission to Congress of amendments to the
sentencing guidelines effective November 1, 2005.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to its authority under 28 U.S.C. 994(p), the
Commission has promulgated amendments to the sentencing guidelines,
policy statements, commentary, and statutory index. This notice sets
forth the amendments and the reason for each amendment.
DATES: The Commission has specified an effective date of November 1,
2005, for the amendments set forth in this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Courlander, Public Affairs
Officer, 202-502-4590. The amendments set forth in this notice also may
be accessed through the Commission's Web site at https://www.ussc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Sentencing Commission is
an independent agency in the judicial branch of the United States
Government. The Commission promulgates sentencing guidelines and policy
statements for Federal sentencing courts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a).
The Commission also periodically reviews and revises previously
promulgated guidelines pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o) and generally
submits guideline amendments to Congress pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(p)
not later than the first day of May each year. Absent action of
Congress to the contrary, submitted amendments become effective by
operation of law on the date specified by the Commission (generally
November 1 of the year in which the amendments are submitted to
Congress).
Notice of proposed amendments was published in the Federal Register
on February 23, 2005 (see 70 FR 8868). The Commission held a public
hearing on the proposed amendments in Washington, DC, on April 12,
2005. On April 29, 2005, the Commission submitted these amendments to
Congress and specified an effective date of November 1, 2005.
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 994(a), (o), and (p); USSC Rule of Practice
and Procedure 4.1.
Ricardo H. Hinojosa,
Chair.
1. Amendment: Chapter Two, Part B, Subpart 1 is amended by adding
at the end the following new guideline and accompanying commentary:
``Sec. 2B1.6. Aggravated Identity Theft
(a) If the defendant was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 1028A,
the guideline sentence is the term of imprisonment required by statute.
Chapters Three (Adjustments) and Four (Criminal History and Criminal
Livelihood) shall not apply to that count of conviction.
Commentary
Statutory Provision: 18 U.S.C. 1028A. For additional statutory
provision(s), see Appendix A (Statutory Index).
Application Notes
1. Imposition of Sentence.--
(A) In General.--Section 1028A of title 18, United States Code,
provides a mandatory term of imprisonment. Accordingly, the guideline
sentence for a defendant convicted under 18 U.S.C. 1028A is the term
required by that statute. Except as provided in subdivision (B), 18
U.S.C. 1028A also requires a term of imprisonment imposed under this
section to run consecutively to any other term of imprisonment.
(B) Multiple Convictions Under Section 1028A.--Section 1028A(b)(4)
of title 18, United States Code, provides that in the case of multiple
convictions under 18 U.S.C. 1028A, the terms of imprisonment imposed on
such counts may, in the discretion of the court, run concurrently, in
whole or in part, with each other. See the Commentary to Sec. 5G1.2
(Sentencing on Multiple Counts of Conviction) for guidance regarding
imposition of sentence on multiple counts of 18 U.S.C. 1028A.
2. Inapplicability of Chapter Two Enhancement.--If a sentence under
this guideline is imposed in conjunction with a sentence for an
underlying offense, do not apply any specific offense characteristic
for the transfer, possession, or use of a means of identification when
determining the sentence for the underlying offense. A sentence under
this guideline accounts for this factor for the underlying offense of
conviction, including any such
[[Page 24853]]
enhancement that would apply based on conduct for which the defendant
is accountable under Sec. 1B1.3 (Relevant Conduct). `Means of
identification' has the meaning given that term in 18 U.S.C.
1028(d)(7).
3. Inapplicability of Chapters Three and Four.--Do not apply
Chapters Three (Adjustments) and Four (Criminal History and Criminal
Livelihood) to any offense sentenced under this guideline. Such
offenses are excluded from application of those chapters because the
guideline sentence for each offense is determined only by the relevant
statute. See Sec. Sec. 3D1.1 (Procedure for Determining Offense Level
on Multiple Counts) and 5G1.2.''.
The Commentary to Sec. 3B1.3 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 1 by inserting ``Definition of `Public or Private
Trust'.--'' before `` `Public or private trust' refers to'', and by
striking the second paragraph; by redesignating Notes 2 through 4 as
Notes 3 through 5, respectively; and by inserting after Note 1 the
following:
``2. Application of Adjustment in Certain Circumstances.--
Notwithstanding Application Note 1, or any other provision of this
guideline, an adjustment under this guideline shall apply to the
following:
(A) An employee of the United States Postal Service who engages in
the theft or destruction of undelivered United States mail.
(B) A defendant who exceeds or abuses the authority of his or her
position in order to obtain unlawfully, or use without authority, any
means of identification. `Means of identification' has the meaning
given that term in 18 U.S.C. 1028(d)(7). The following are examples to
which this subdivision would apply: (i) An employee of a state motor
vehicle department who exceeds or abuses the authority of his or her
position by knowingly issuing a driver's license based on false,
incomplete, or misleading information; (ii) a hospital orderly who
exceeds or abuses the authority of his or her position by obtaining or
misusing patient identification information from a patient chart; and
(iii) a volunteer at a charitable organization who exceeds or abuses
the authority of his or her position by obtaining or misusing
identification information from a donor's file.''.
Section 3D1.1 is amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting
the following:
``(b) Exclude from the application of Sec. Sec. 3D1.2-3D1.5 the
following:
(1) Any count for which the statute (A) specifies a term of
imprisonment to be imposed; and (B) requires that such term of
imprisonment be imposed to run consecutively to any other term of
imprisonment. Sentences for such counts are governed by the provisions
of Sec. 5G1.2(a).
(2) Any count of conviction under 18 U.S.C. 1028A. See Application
Note 2(B) of the Commentary to Sec. 5G1.2 (Sentencing on Multiple
Counts of Conviction) for guidance on how sentences for multiple counts
of conviction under 18 U.S.C. 1028A should be imposed.''.
The Commentary to Sec. 5G1.2 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 2 by inserting ``(A) In General.''--before ``Subsection
(a) applies''; by inserting ``and 18 U.S.C. 1028A (requiring a
mandatory term of imprisonment of either two or five years, based on
the conduct involved, and also requiring, except in the circumstances
described in subdivision (B), the sentence imposed to run consecutively
to any other term of imprisonment)'' after ``imprisonment)''; by
striking ``Note, however,'' and all that follows through ``Sec.
3624(e).''; and by adding at the end the following:
``(B) Multiple Convictions Under 18 U.S.C. 1028A.--Section 1028A of
title 18, United States Code, generally requires that the mandatory
term of imprisonment for a violation of such section be imposed
consecutively to any other term of imprisonment. However, 18 U.S.C.
1028A(b)(4) permits the court, in its discretion, to impose the
mandatory term of imprisonment on a defendant for a violation of such
section ``concurrently, in whole or in part, only with another term of
imprisonment that is imposed by the court at the same time on that
person for an additional violation of this section, provided that such
discretion shall be exercised in accordance with any applicable
guidelines and policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission *
* *''.
In determining whether multiple counts of 18 U.S.C. 1028A should
run concurrently with, or consecutively to, each other, the court
should consider the following non-exhaustive list of factors:
(i) The nature and seriousness of the underlying offenses. For
example, the court should consider the appropriateness of imposing
consecutive, or partially consecutive, terms of imprisonment for
multiple counts of 18 U.S.C. 1028A in a case in which an underlying
offense for one of the 18 U.S.C. 1028A offenses is a crime of violence
or an offense enumerated in 18 U.S.C. 2332b(g)(5)(B).
(ii) Whether the underlying offenses are groupable under Sec.
3D1.2 (Multiple Counts). Generally, multiple counts of 18 U.S.C. 1028A
should run concurrently with one another in cases in which the
underlying offenses are groupable under Sec. 3D1.2.
(iii) Whether the purposes of sentencing set forth in 18 U.S.C.
3553(a)(2) are better achieved by imposing a concurrent or a
consecutive sentence for multiple counts of 18 U.S.C. 1028A.
(C) Imposition of Supervised Release.--In the case of a consecutive
term of imprisonment imposed under subsection (a), any term of
supervised release imposed is to run concurrently with any other term
of supervised release imposed.
See 18 U.S.C. 3624(e).''.
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is amended by inserting after the line
referenced to 18 U.S.C. 1028 the following:
``18 U.S.C. 1028A 2B1.6''.
Reason for Amendment: This amendment implements sections 2 and 5 of
the Identity Theft Penalty Enhancement Act, Public Law 108-275, 118
Stat. 831 (``the Act''), which create two new criminal offenses at 18
U.S.C. 1028A and direct the Sentencing Commission to expand the upward
adjustment at Sec. 3B1.3 (Abuse of Position of Trust/Special Skill).
This amendment also provides guidance to the courts on imposing
sentences for multiple violations of section 1028A.
The Act creates a new offense at 18 U.S.C. 1028A(a)(1) that
prohibits the unauthorized transfer, use, or possession of a means of
identification of another person during, or in relation to, specific
enumerated felonies. These felonies consist of various types of fraud,
including mail and wire fraud in connection with passports, visas and
other immigration, nationality, and citizenship laws, programs under
the Social Security Act, and the acquisition of firearms. A conviction
under section 1028A(a)(1) carries a two-year mandatory term of
imprisonment that must run consecutively to any other term of
imprisonment, including the sentence for the underlying felony
conviction. The Act also creates a new offense at 18 U.S.C. 1028A(b)(1)
that prohibits the unauthorized transfer, use, or possession of a means
of identification of another person during, or in relation to, specific
felonies enumerated in 18 U.S.C. 2332b(g)(5)(B) (``federal crimes of
terrorism''). Section 1028A(b)(1) provides a five-year mandatory term
of imprisonment that must run consecutively to any other term of
imprisonment, including the sentence for the underlying felony
conviction. As described below, section
[[Page 24854]]
1028A(b)(4) creates an exception to the requirement for consecutive
terms of imprisonment in cases involving multiple violations of the
statute sentenced at the same time.
First, in response to the creation of these new criminal offenses,
the amendment creates a new guideline at Sec. 2B1.6 (Aggravated
Identity Theft). This guideline is patterned after Sec. 2K2.4 (Use of
a Firearm, Armor-Piercing Ammunition, or Explosive During or in
Relation to a Certain Crimes). Because the new offenses carry a fixed,
mandatory consecutive term of imprisonment, the new guideline, as does
Sec. 2K2.4, provides that the guideline sentence is the term of
imprisonment required by statute. To avoid unwarranted double-counting,
the amendment contains an application note that prohibits the
application of any specific offense characteristic for the transfer,
possession, or use of a means of identification when determining the
sentence for the underlying offense in cases in which a sentence under
Sec. 2B1.6 is imposed in conjunction with a sentence for an underlying
offense. Also, consistent with Sec. 2K2.4, the new guideline at Sec.
2B1.6 contains an application note that provides that adjustments under
Chapters Three and Four are inapplicable to sentences under this
guideline.
Second, in response to the directive in section 5 to amend Sec.
3B1.3 (Abuse of Trust or Use of Special Skill) to include a ``defendant
[who] exceeds or abuses the authority of his or her position in order
to obtain unlawfully or use without authority any means of
identification,'' the Commission created Application Note 2 to Sec.
3B1.3 to include such defendants within the scope of the guideline. The
application note contains several examples to illustrate the types of
conduct intended to be within the scope of the new provision.
Third, the amendment adds a number of provisions at appropriate
guidelines in order to provide guidance to courts in accordance with
section 2 of the Act (18 U.S.C. 1028A(b)(4)). That section states that
``a term of imprisonment imposed on a person for violation of this
section may, in the discretion of the court, run concurrently, in whole
or in part, only with another term of imprisonment that is imposed by
the court at the same time on that person for an additional violation
of this section, provided that such discretion shall be exercised in
accordance with any applicable guidelines and policy statements issued
by the Sentencing Commission * * *.'' The amendment states a general
rule, at Sec. 5G1.2 (Sentencing on Multiple Counts of Conviction),
Application Note 2(B), providing that the court has discretion to
impose concurrent or consecutive, or partially concurrent and partially
consecutive, terms of imprisonment for multiple violations of 18 U.S.C.
1028A. A non-exhaustive list of factors for courts to consider in
making this determination is provided, including the nature and
seriousness of the underlying offenses and whether the offenses would
be groupable under Sec. 3D1.2 (Multiple Counts).
Finally, the amendment modifies Sec. 3D1.1 (Procedure for
Determining Offense Level on Multiple Counts) to make clear that
section 1028A offenses are excluded from the general grouping rules in
Sec. Sec. 3D1.2-3D1.5 and makes conforming additions and changes to
the new guideline at Sec. 2B1.6 (Aggravated Identity Theft) in
Application Note 1 and Sec. 3D1.1(b)(1) and (2).
2. Amendment: Section 2R1.1(a) is amended by striking ``10'' and
inserting ``12''.
Section 2R1.1(b) is amended by striking subdivision (2) and
inserting the following:
``(2) If the volume of commerce attributable to the defendant was
more than $1,000,000, adjust the offense level as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volume of commerce (apply the greatest) Adjustment to offense level
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) More than $1,000,000.................. add 2.
(B) More than $10,000,000................. add 4.
(C) More than $40,000,000................. add 6.
(D) More than $100,000,000................ add 8.
(E) More than $250,000,000................ add 10.
(F) More than $500,000,000................ add 12.
(G) More than $1,000,000,000.............. add 14.
(H) More than $1,500,000,000.............. add 16.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For purposes of this guideline, the volume of commerce attributable
to an individual participant in a conspiracy is the volume of commerce
done by him or his principal in goods or services that were affected by
the violation. When multiple counts or conspiracies are involved, the
volume of commerce should be treated cumulatively to determine a
single, combined offense level.''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2R1.1 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended by striking Note 1 and inserting the following:
``1. Application of Chapter Three (Adjustments).--Sections 3B1.1
(Aggravating Role), 3B1.2 (Mitigating Role), 3B1.3 (Abuse of Position
of Trust or Use of Special Skill), and 3C1.1 (Obstructing or Impeding
the Administration of Justice) may be relevant in determining the
seriousness of the defendant's offense. For example, if a sales manager
organizes or leads the price-fixing activity of five or more
participants, the 4-level increase at Sec. 3B1.1(a) should be applied
to reflect the defendant's aggravated role in the offense. For purposes
of applying Sec. 3B1.2, an individual defendant should be considered
for a mitigating role adjustment only if he were responsible in some
minor way for his firm's participation in the conspiracy.''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2R1.1 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 2 by striking the first sentence and inserting the
following:
``Considerations in Setting Fine for Individuals.--In setting the
fine for individuals, the court should consider the extent of the
defendant's participation in the offense, the defendant's role, and the
degree to which the defendant personally profited from the offense
(including salary, bonuses, and career enhancement).''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2R1.1 captioned ``Background'' is amended
in the second paragraph by striking the ``The Commission'' and all that
follows through ``general deterrence.''; in the third paragraph by
striking ``confinement of six months or longer'' and inserting ``some
period of confinement''; and in the last paragraph by striking the last
sentence.
Reason for Amendment: This amendment responds to the Antitrust
Criminal Penalty Enhancement and Reform Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-237
(the ``Act''). The Act increased the statutory maximum term of
imprisonment for antitrust offenses under 15 U.S.C. 1 and 3(b) from
three to ten years. The amendment responds to congressional concern
about the seriousness of antitrust offenses and provides for antitrust
penalties that are more proportionate to those for sophisticated frauds
sentenced under Sec. 2B1.1 (Larceny, Embezzlement, and Other Forms of
Theft; Offenses Involving Stolen Property; Property Damage or
Destruction; Fraud and Deceit; Forgery; Offenses Involving Altered or
Counterfeit Instruments Other than Counterfeit Bearer Obligations of
the United States). The Commission has long recognized the similarity
of antitrust offenses to sophisticated frauds.
The amendment increases the base offense level for antitrust
offenses in Sec. 2R1.1 (Bid-Rigging, Price-Fixing or Market-Allocation
Agreements Among Competitors) to level 12. The higher base offense
level ensures that penalties
[[Page 24855]]
for antitrust offenses will be coextensive with those for sophisticated
frauds sentenced under Sec. 2B1.1 and recognizes congressional concern
about the inherent seriousness of antitrust offenses. The penalties for
sophisticated fraud have been increased incrementally due to a series
of amendments to Sec. 2B1.1, while no commensurate increases for
antitrust offenses had occurred. Raising the base offense level of
Sec. 2R1.1 helps restore the historic proportionality in the treatment
of antitrust offenses and sophisticated frauds.
The ``volume of commerce'' table at Sec. 2R1.1(b)(2) is amended to
provide up to 16 additional offense levels for the defendant whose
offense involves more than $1,500,000,000, while the new table's first
threshold is raised from $400,000 to $1,000,000. The new volume of
commerce table: (1) Recognizes the depreciation in the value of the
dollar since the table was last revised in 1991; (2) responds to data
indicating that the financial magnitude of antitrust offenses has
increased significantly; and (3) provides greater deterrence of large
scale price-fixing crimes.
Application Note 1 to Sec. 2R1.1 is amended to emphasize the
potential relevance of such Chapter Three enhancements as Sec. 3B1.1
(Aggravating Role), Sec. 3B1.3 (Abuse of Position of Trust or Use of
Special Skill), and Sec. 3C1.1 (Obstructing or Impeding the
Administration of Justice) in determining the appropriate sentence for
an antitrust offender. Application Note 2 also is amended to highlight
the potential relevance of the defendant's role in the offense in
determining the amount of fine to be imposed. Finally, the amendment
strikes outdated background commentary.
3. Amendment: Section 2A2.4 is amended by striking the Commentary
captioned ``Background''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2B1.1 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 15 in the first sentence by inserting ``involving
fraudulent conduct that is'' after ``establishes an offense''; and in
the second sentence by inserting ``involves fraudulent conduct that''
after ``the offense''.
Section 2B3.3(c)(1) is amended by inserting ``; Fraud Involving the
Deprivation of the Intangible Right to Honest Services of Public
Officials; Conspiracy to Defraud by Interference with Governmental
Functions'' after ``Official Right''.
Section 2C1.3(c)(1) is amended by inserting ``; Fraud Involving the
Deprivation of the Intangible Right to Honest Services of Public
Officials; Conspiracy to Defraud by Interference with Governmental
Functions'' after ``Official Right''.
Section 2C1.8(c)(1) is amended by inserting ``; Fraud Involving the
Deprivation of the Intangible Right to Honest Services of Public
Officials; Conspiracy to Defraud by Interference with Governmental
Functions'' after ``Official Right''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2D1.1 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 5 in the first paragraph by striking ``whether a
greater quantity of the analogue is needed to produce a substantially
similar effect on the central nervous system as'' and inserting
``whether the same quantity of analogue produces a greater effect on
the central nervous system than''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2D1.1 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 19 by striking ``(b)(5)(A)'' each place it appears and
inserting ``(b)(6)(A)''; in Note 20 by striking ``(b)(5)(B) or (C)''
and inserting ``(b)(6)(B) or (C)''; and by striking ``(b)(5)(C)'' and
inserting ``(b)(6)(C)''; and in Note 21 by striking ``(b)(6)'' each
place it appears and inserting ``(b)(7)''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2D1.1 captioned ``Background'' is amended
in the ninth paragraph by striking ``(b)(5)(A)'' and inserting
``(b)(6)(A)''; in the last paragraph and by striking ``(b)(5)(B) and
(C)'' and inserting ``(b)(6)(B) and (C)''.
Section 2D1.11(e) is amended in subdivision (1) by striking ``2271
L or more of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``1135.5 L or more of
Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (2) by striking ``At least 681.3 L but less than
2271 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 340.7 L but
less than 1135.5 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (3) by striking ``At least 227.1 L but less than
681.3 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 113.6 L but
less than 340.7 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (4) by striking ``At least 159 L but less than 227.1
L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 79.5 L but less
than 113.6 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (5) by striking ``At least 90.8 L but less than 159
L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 45.4 L but less
than 79.5 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (6) by striking ``At least 22.7 L but less than 90.8
L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 11.4 L but less
than 45.4 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (7) by striking ``At least 18.2 L but less than 22.7
L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 9.1 L but less
than 11.4 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (8) by striking ``At least 13.6 L but less than 18.2
L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 6.8 L but less
than 9.1 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (9) by striking ``At least 9.1 L but less than 13.6
L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 4.5 L but less
than 6.8 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
and in subdivision (10) by striking ``Less than 9.1 L of Gamma-
butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``Less than 4.5 L of Gamma-
butyrolactone;''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2K2.1 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by striking ``(e)-(i), (k)-(o)'' and inserting ``(e)-(h), (j)-
(n)''.
Section 2M6.1 is amended by striking ``(a)(4)*'' in subsection
(b)(1)(A) and inserting ``(a)(4)(A)''; and by striking ``*Note: The
reference to ``(a)(4)'' should be to ``(a)(4)(A)'.''.
Section 3D1.2(d) is amended by striking ``2C1.7,''.
The Commentary to Sec. 5D1.2 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 2 by inserting ``Limitation on'' before ``Applicability
of Statutory''.
Section 8C2.1(a) is amended by striking ``, 2C1.7''.
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is amended by striking the following:
``18 U.S.C. 924(i) 2K2.1
18 U.S.C. 924(j)(1) 2A1.1, 2A1.2
18 U.S.C. 924(j)(2) 2A1.3, 2A1.4
18 U.S.C. 924(k)-(o) 2K2.1'',
and inserting the following:
``18 U.S.C. 924(i)(1) 2A1.1, 2A1.2
18 U.S.C. 924(i)(2) 2A1.3, 2A1.4
18 U.S.C. 924(j)-(n) 2K2.1''.
Reason for Amendment: This ten-part amendment consists of technical
and conforming amendments to various guidelines.
First, this amendment deletes unnecessary background commentary in
Sec. 2A2.4 (Obstructing or Impeding Officers).
Second, this amendment makes minor clarifying amendments to
Application Note 15 in the fraud guideline, Sec. 2B1.1, to make clear
that, in order for the cross reference at Sec. 2B1.1(c)(3) to apply,
the conduct set forth in the count of conviction must establish a fraud
or false statement-type offense.
Third, this amendment makes technical amendments to several
guidelines to conform to changes made in the public corruption
guidelines in the 2004 amendment cycle (see Appendix C to the
Guidelines Manual, Amendment 666). Specifically, the proposed amendment
corrects title references to Sec. 2C1.1 in Sec. Sec. 2B3.3(c)(1),
[[Page 24856]]
2C1.3(c)(1), and 2C1.8(c)(1) and strikes references to Sec. 2C1.7 in
Sec. Sec. 3D1.2(d) and 8C2.1.
Fourth, this amendment clarifies Application Note 5 in the drug
guideline, Sec. 2D1.1, regarding drug analogues. The current note
suggests that drug analogues are less potent than the drug for which it
is an analogue. However, by statute, analogues can only be the same or
more potent.
Fifth, this amendment redesignates incorrect references in a number
of Application Notes in the drug guideline, Sec. 2D1.1.
Sixth, this amendment conforms Sec. 2D1.11 (Unlawfully
Distributing, Importing, Exporting or Possessing a Listed Chemical;
Attempt or Conspiracy) to changes made in the drug guideline, Sec.
2D1.1, in the 2004 amendment cycle (see Appendix C to the Guidelines
Manual, Amendment 667). Specifically, the proposed amendment amends the
Chemical Quantity Table in Sec. 2D1.11(e) so that the amount of gamma-
butyrolactone (GBL), at any particular offense level, is the amount
that provides a 100 percent yield of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB).
Seventh, this amendment updates the statutory provisions in Sec.
2K2.1 (Unlawful Receipt, Possession, or Transportation of Firearms or
Ammunition; Prohibited Transactions Involving Firearms or Ammunition)
to account for redesignations of 18 U.S.C. 924 offenses.
Eighth, this amendment corrects a typographical error in Sec.
2M6.1 (Weapons of Mass Destruction).
Ninth, this amendment corrects the title to Sec. 5C1.2 (Limitation
on Applicability of Statutory Minimum Sentence in Certain Cases) in
Application Note 2 of Sec. 5D1.2 (Terms of Supervised Release.).
Tenth, this amendment corrects Appendix A (Statutory Index) to
account for redesignations of 18 U.S.C. 924 offenses.
[FR Doc. 05-9378 Filed 5-10-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2211-01-P