Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 24372-24373 [05-9157]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
24372
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 88 / Monday, May 9, 2005 / Notices
high probability of being accomplished.
The points awarded will be as specified
in paragraphs (1) through (4) of this
section. In each case, the intermediary’s
work plan must provide documentation
that the selection criteria have been met
in order to qualify for selection criteria
points. If an application does not fit one
of the categories listed, it receives no
points for that paragraph.
(1) Other funds. Points allowed under
this paragraph are to be based on
documented successful history or
written evidence that the funds are
available.
(a) The intermediary will obtain nonAgency loan or grant funds or provide
housing tax credits (measured in
dollars) to pay part of the cost of the
ultimate recipients’ project cost. Points
for the amount of funds from other
sources are as follows:
(i) At least 10% but less than 25% of
the total project cost—5 points;
(ii) At least 25% but less than 50% of
the total project cost—10 points; or
(iii) 50% or more of the total project
cost—15 points.
(b) The intermediary will provide
loans to the ultimate recipient from its
own funds (not loan or grant) to pay part
of the ultimate recipients’ project cost.
The amount of the intermediary’s own
funds will average:
(i) At least 10% but less than 25% of
the total project costs—5 points;
(ii) At least 25% but less than 50% of
total project costs—10 points; or
(iii) 50% or more of total project
costs—15 points.
(2) Intermediary contribution. All
assets of the PRLF will serve as security
for the PRLF loan, and the intermediary
will contribute funds not derived from
the Agency into the PRLF along with the
proceeds of the PRLF loan. The amount
of non-Agency derived funds
contributed to the PRLF will equal the
following percentage of the Agency
PRLF loan:
(a) At least 5% but less than 15%—
15 points;
(b) At least 15% but less than 25%—
30 points; or
(c) 25% or more—50 points.
(3) Experience. The intermediary has
actual experience in the administration
of revolving loan funds and the
preservation of multi-family housing,
with a successful record, for the
following number of full years.
Applicants must have actual experience
in both the administration of revolving
loan funds and the preservation of
multi-family housing in order to qualify
for points under this selection criteria.
If the number of years of experience
differs between the two types of
experience, the type with the least
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:20 May 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
number of years will be used for this
selection criteria.
(a) At least 1 but less than 3 years—
5 points;
(b) At least 3 but less than 5 years—
10 points;
(c) At least 5 but less than 10 years—
20 points; or
(d) 10 or more years—30 points.
(4) Administrative. The Administrator
may assign up to 35 additional points to
an application to account for the
following items not adequately covered
by the other priority criteria set out in
this section. The items that may be
considered are the amount of funds
requested in relation to the amount of
need; a particularly successful
affordable housing development record;
a service area with no other PRLF
coverage; a service area with severe
affordable housing problems; a service
area with emergency conditions caused
by a natural disaster; an innovative
proposal; the quality of the proposed
program; a work plan that is in accord
with a strategic plan, particularly a plan
prepared as part of a request for an
Empowerment Zone/Enterprise
Community designation; or excellent
utilization of an existing revolving loan
fund program.
Dated: May 2, 2005.
Russell T. Davis,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 05–9155 Filed 5–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
Notice for Requests for Proposals for
Guaranteed Loans Under the Section
538 Guaranteed Rural Rental Housing
Program (GRRHP) for Fiscal Year 2005
2005, with the highest scoring responses
receiving priority as long as funds
remain available. These corrections are
also intended to ensure that the Agency
will continue to select the highest
scoring Notice responses received after
June 13, 2005, notwithstanding the
score, as long as the response meets
program criteria and funds remain
available.
Accordingly, the Notice published on
March 14, 2005 (70 FR 12569–12575), is
corrected as follows:
On page 12569, in the first column,
fourth paragraph, under the heading
DATES, the fourth sentence is corrected
to read as follows: ‘‘Each month after
June 13, 2005, the Agency will select the
highest scoring proposals, in light of the
remaining funding, until all funds are
expended.’’
On page 12569, in the second column,
under the heading DATES, the fifth
sentence, ‘‘Priority for the selection of
proposals that meet the threshold score
of 25 will be given to the highest scoring
proposals,’’ is removed.
On page 12574, in the first column,
first paragraph, under the heading
‘‘Scoring of Priority Criteria for
Selection of Projects,’’ the fifth sentence
is corrected to read as follows: ‘‘Each
month after June 13, 2005, the Agency
will select the highest scoring proposals,
in light of the remaining funding, until
all funds are expended.’’
On page 12574, in the first column,
first paragraph, under the heading
‘‘Scoring of Priority Criteria for
Selection of Projects,’’ the sixth
sentence, ‘‘Priority for the selection of
proposals that meet the threshold score
of 25 will be given to the highest scoring
proposals,’’ is removed.
AGENCY:
Dated: April 8, 2005.
Russell T. Davis,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 05–9156 Filed 5–6–05; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
Rural Housing Service, USDA.
Notice; correction.
SUMMARY: The Rural Housing Service
(RHS) is correcting a notice published
March 14, 2005 (70 FR 12569–12575).
This action is taken to correct language
that purports that Notice responses that
score less than 25 points or score 25
points or more but have a development
cost ratio of equal to or more than 70
percent may not be selected for further
processing and obligation after June 13,
2005. These corrections are intended to
ensure that all Notice responses
received prior to June 13, 2005, and that
meet program criteria, but score less
than 25 points or score 25 points or
more but have a development cost ratio
of equal to or more than 70 percent may
be selected for obligation after June 13,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce has
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
Agency: Economic Development
Administration.
Title: Award for Excellence in
Economic Development.
Form Number(s):
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 88 / Monday, May 9, 2005 / Notices
OMB Approval Number: New.
Type of Review: Regular.
Burden Hours: 150 hours.
Number of Respondents: 50.
Average Hours Per Response: 3 hours.
Needs and Uses: EDA provides a
broad range of economic development
assistance to help distressed
communities design and implement
effective economic development
strategies. Part of this assistance
includes disseminating information
about best practices and encouraging
collegial learning among economic
development practitioners. EDA has
created the Award for Excellence in
Economic Development to recognize
outstanding economic development
activities of national importance.
Affected Public: State, local or Indian
tribal governments and not-for-profit
organizations.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker,
(202) 395–3897.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of
Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dHynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to David Rostker, OMB Desk
Officer, FAX number (202) 395–7285, or
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov.
Dated: May 3, 2005.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–9157 Filed 5–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–34–U
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce (DOC)
has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
clearance of the following proposal for
collection of information under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Agency: Bureau of Economic Analysis
(BEA), Commerce.
Title: Generic Clearance for Pretesting
Research.
Form Number(s): Various.
Agency Approval Number: Will be
assigned by OMB.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:20 May 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
Type of Request: New collection.
Burden: 5,000 hours.
Number of Respondents: 5,000.
Average Hours Per Response: 1 hour.
Needs and Uses: This research
program will be used by BEA to
improve questionnaires and procedures,
reduce respondent burden, improve
sample frames, and ultimately increase
the quality of data collected in the
bureau’s surveys. The clearance will be
used to conduct pretesting of surveys
conducted by BEA prior to mailing the
final survey packages to potential
respondents. Pretesting activities will
involve methods for identifying
problems with the questionnaire or
survey procedure such as the following:
Cognitive interviews, focus groups,
respondent debriefings, behavior coding
of respondent/interviewer interaction,
split panel tests, voluntary sample
surveys (including automated surveys).
OMB will be informed in writing of the
purpose and scope of each of these
activities, as well as the time frame and
the number of burden hours used. The
number of hours used will not exceed
the number set aside for this purpose.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profit organizations, not-for-profit
institutions, and State, Local or Tribal
Governments.
Frequency: As requested.
Respondents Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: International
Investment and Trade in Services
Survey Act (Pub. L. 94–472, 22 U.S.C.
3101–3108).
OMB Desk Officer: Paul Bugg, (202)
395–3093.
You may obtain copies of the above
information collection proposal by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, Department of Commerce, Room
6025, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20230, or via the
Internet at dhynek@doc.gov.
Send comments on the proposed
information collection within 30 days of
publication of the notice to Office of
Management and Budget, O.I.R.A.,
Attention PRA Desk Officer for BEA, via
the Internet at pbugg@omb.eop.gov, or
by FAX at 202–395–7245.
Dated: May 3, 2005.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–9158 Filed 5–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–34–P
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24373
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–867]
Automotive Replacement Glass
Windshields From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) is conducting the
second administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on automotive
replacement glass (‘‘ARG’’) windshields
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’) covering the period April 1,
2003, through March 31, 2004. We have
preliminarily determined that sales have
been made below normal value. If these
preliminary results are adopted in our
final results of this review, we will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to assess
antidumping duties on entries of subject
merchandise during the period of
review (‘‘POR’’), for which the importerspecific assessment rates are above de
minimis.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
We will issue the final results no later
than 120 days from the date of
publication of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 9, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon
Freed or Will Dickerson, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3818 and (202)
482–1778, respectively.
AGENCY:
Background
On April 4, 2002, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
antidumping duty order on ARG
windshields from the PRC. See
Antidumping Duty Order: Automotive
Replacement Glass Windshields from
the People’s Republic of China, 67 FR
16087. On April 1, 2004, the
Department published a notice of
opportunity to request an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on ARG windshields from the PRC for
the period April 1, 2003, through March
31, 2004. See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation: Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 69
FR 17129. On April 21, 2004, Pilkington
North America, Inc. (‘‘PNA’’), an
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 88 (Monday, May 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24372-24373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-9157]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
The Department of Commerce has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Agency: Economic Development Administration.
Title: Award for Excellence in Economic Development.
Form Number(s):
[[Page 24373]]
OMB Approval Number: New.
Type of Review: Regular.
Burden Hours: 150 hours.
Number of Respondents: 50.
Average Hours Per Response: 3 hours.
Needs and Uses: EDA provides a broad range of economic development
assistance to help distressed communities design and implement
effective economic development strategies. Part of this assistance
includes disseminating information about best practices and encouraging
collegial learning among economic development practitioners. EDA has
created the Award for Excellence in Economic Development to recognize
outstanding economic development activities of national importance.
Affected Public: State, local or Indian tribal governments and not-
for-profit organizations.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dHynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or
David--Rostker@omb.eop.gov.
Dated: May 3, 2005.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-9157 Filed 5-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-34-U
