Special Local Regulations: Annual Suncoast Offshore Grand Prix; Gulf of Mexico, Sarasota, FL, 23946-23948 [05-9079]
Download as PDF
23946
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Proposed Rules
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
For more information about this
conference, please contact Keith Pierce, Federal holidays.
Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates at
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(202) 502–8525 or Keith.Pierce@ferc.gov. Lieutenant Junior Grade Jennifer
Andrew at Coast Guard Marine Safety
Linda Mitry,
Office Tampa (813) 228–2191 Ext 8203.
Deputy Secretary.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 05–9072 Filed 5–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD 07–05–039]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations: Annual
Suncoast Offshore Grand Prix; Gulf of
Mexico, Sarasota, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
amend the permanent special local
regulations for the Suncoast Offshore
Challenge and the Suncoast Offshore
Grand Prix in the Gulf of Mexico near
Sarasota, Florida. By existing permanent
special local regulations, these two race
events have nearly identical course and
time characteristics, however one event
is held annually on the first Saturday of
July and the other event is held
annually on the first Sunday of July.
The sponsor has decided to combine the
events into a single day, reduced the
length of the racecourse, and modified
the times of the event which would take
place annually on the first Sunday of
July between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m.
(Eastern Daylight Time). These amended
regulations are necessary to provide for
the safety of life for the participating
vessels, spectators, and mariners on the
navigable waters of the United States
during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
June 6, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Coast Guard
Marine Safety Office Tampa, 155
Columbia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33606–
3598. The Waterways Management
Division maintains the public docket for
this rulemaking. Comments and
material received from the public, as
well as documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, will become part of this docket
and will be available for inspection or
copying at Coast Guard Marine Safety
Office Tampa between 7:30 a.m. and 4
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:58 May 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD 07–05–039),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to Coast Guard
Marine Safety Office Tampa at the
address under ADDRESSES explaining
why one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The Annual Suncoast Offshore
Challenge and Annual Offshore Grand
Prix in the Gulf of Mexico near Sarasota,
Florida are governed by permanent
regulations at 33 CFR § 100.719 and 33
CFR § 100.720, respectively, and are
normally held on the first Saturday and
Sunday of July between 10 a.m. and 4
p.m. Event coordinators have decided to
combine the two events to take place
annually on the first Sunday of July
between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. Event
coordinators are also reducing the
length of the racecourse which would
allow for Big Sarasota Pass channel to
remain open during the event.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is necessary to
accommodate the rescheduling of the
Annual Suncoast Offshore Challenge
onto the date of the Annual Suncoast
Offshore Grand Prix race date and to
modify the regulated area to account for
changes in the length of the racecourse.
The proposed rule would remove 33
CFR § 100.719, the existing permanent
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
regulation for the Annual Suncoast
Offshore Challenge scheduled for the
first Saturday in July. That event would
be consolidated with 33 CFR § 100.720,
the Annual Suncoast Offshore Grand
Prix into a one-day race event to be held
on the already established Grand Prix
race day, annually on the first Sunday
of July. The proposed termination time
of 33 CFR § 100.720 would change from
4 p.m. to 5 p.m. Additionally, the
Coordinates of the regulated area would
be modified to reflect a reduced length
in the racecourse and to open Big
Sarasota Pass to vessel traffic which is
normally blocked under the existing
special local regulations.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary. The proposed
regulation would be in effect for a
limited time and is located in an area
where vessel traffic is limited.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule may affect
the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owners and
operators of vessels intending to transit
near to shore at Lido Key in Sarasota, FL
in the vicinity of Big Sarasota Pass and
New Pass annually from 10 a.m. to 5
p.m. on the first Sunday in July. This
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Proposed Rules
since it will be in effect for a limited
time in an area where vessel traffic is
limited.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this
rule or any policy or action of the Coast
Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:58 May 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23947
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. As a special local
regulation issued in conjunction with a
boat race, this proposed rule satisfies
the requirements of paragraph (34)(h).
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of
the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we
make the final decision on whether to
categorically exclude this rule from
further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
§ 100.719
[Removed]
2. Remove § 100.719.
3. Revise § 100.720 to read as follows:
§ 100.720 Annual Suncoast Offshore
Grand Prix; Gulf of Mexico, Sarasota, FL.
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area
is established by a line drawn from the
start position 27°18′22″ N, 82°35′46″ W
thence to position 27°16′30″ N,
82°35′17″ W thence to position
27°16′30″ N, 82°35′02″ W thence to
position 27°18′18″ N, 82°34′45″ W
thence to position 27°18′53″ N,
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
23948
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Proposed Rules
82°35′04″ W thence to position
27°18′47″ N, 82°35′39″ W thence back to
the start position. All coordinates
referenced use datum: NAD 83.
(b) Special local regulations. (1) No
anchoring will be permitted seaward of
the shoreside boundaries of the
regulated area out to three nautical
miles from shore.
(2) Anchoring for spectators will be
permitted shoreward of the shoreside
boundaries of the regulated area.
(3) All vessel traffic not involved with
the Suncoast Offshore Grand Prix,
entering and exiting New Pass must exit
at New Pass Channel daybeacon #3
(27°26′28″ N, 82°41′42″ W, LLNR 18100)
and #4 (27°26′24″ N, 82°41′41″ W, LLNR
18105), and must proceed in a northerly
direction shoreward of spectator craft,
taking action to avoid a close-quarters
situation until finally past and clear of
the racecourse. All coordinates
referenced use datum: NAD 83.
(4) All vessel traffic not involved with
the Suncoast Offshore Grand Prix,
entering and exiting Big Sarasota Pass
Channel will be allowed to transit only
within the marked channel at Big
Sarasota Pass Channel, taking action to
avoid a close-quarters situation until
finally past and clear of the racecourse.
(5) Entry within the regulated area is
prohibited for all non-participating
vessels.
(c) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from 10 a.m. until 5
p.m. EDT, annually on the first Sunday
of July.
Dated: April 19, 2005.
W. E. Justice,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–9079 Filed 5–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05–05–033]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Georgetown Channel,
Potomac River, Washington, DC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary security zone on
the waters of the upper Potomac River.
This action is necessary to provide for
the security of a large number of visitors
to the annual July 4th celebration on the
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:58 May 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
National Mall in Washington, DC. The
security zone will allow for control of a
designated area of the river and
safeguard spectators and high-ranking
officials.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
May 26, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 2401
Hawkins Point Road, Building 70,
Waterways Management Division,
Baltimore, Maryland 21226–1791. Coast
Guard Sector Baltimore, Waterways
Management Division, maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking. You
may also submit comments
electronically to
rlhouck@actbalt.uscg.mil. Comments
and material received from the public,
as well as documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, will become part of this docket
and will be available for inspection or
copying at Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, Waterways Management
Division, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ronald Houck, at Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, Waterways Management
Division, at telephone number (410)
576–2674 or (410) 576–2693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD05–05–033),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. You may also
submit comments electronically to
rlhouck@actbalt.uscg.mil. If you would
like to know that your submission
reached us, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
We may change this proposed rule in
view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Waterways
Management Division, at the address
under ADDRESSES explaining why one
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place
announced by a separate notice in the
Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The U.S. Maritime Administration
(MARAD) in Advisory 02–07 advised
U.S. shipping interests to maintain a
heightened state of alert against possible
terrorist attacks. MARAD more recently
issued Advisory 03–06 informing
operators of maritime interests of
increased threat possibilities to vessels
and facilities and a higher risk of
terrorist attack to the transportation
community in the United States. The
ongoing hostilities in Afghanistan and
Iraq have made it prudent for U.S. ports
and waterways to be on a higher state
of alert because the al Qaeda
organization and other similar
organizations have declared an ongoing
intention to conduct armed attacks on
U.S. interests worldwide.
Due to increased awareness that
future terrorist attacks are possible, the
Coast Guard as lead federal agency for
maritime homeland security, has
determined that the Captain of the Port
Baltimore must have the means to be
aware of, deter, detect, intercept, and
respond to asymmetric threats, acts of
aggression, and attacks by terrorists on
the American homeland while still
maintaining our freedoms and
sustaining the flow of commerce. This
security zone is part of a comprehensive
port security regime designed to
safeguard human life, vessels, and
waterfront facilities against sabotage or
terrorist attacks.
In this particular rulemaking, to
address the aforementioned security
concerns, and to take steps to prevent
the catastrophic impact that a terrorist
attack against a large number of
spectators and high-ranking officials
during the annual July 4th celebration
would have on the public interest, the
Coast Guard is proposing to establish a
security zone upon all waters of the
Georgetown Channel of the Potomac
River, from the surface to the bottom,
between the Long Railroad Bridge (the
most eastern bridge of the 5-span,
Fourteenth Street Bridge Complex) to
the Theodore Roosevelt Memorial
Bridge and all waters in between,
including the waters of the Georgetown
Channel Tidal Basin. This security zone
will help the Coast Guard to prevent
vessels or persons from engaging in
terrorist actions against a large number
of spectators and high-ranking officials
during the annual July 4th celebration.
Due to these heightened security
concerns, and the catastrophic impact a
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 87 (Friday, May 6, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23946-23948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-9079]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD 07-05-039]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations: Annual Suncoast Offshore Grand Prix;
Gulf of Mexico, Sarasota, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend the permanent special local
regulations for the Suncoast Offshore Challenge and the Suncoast
Offshore Grand Prix in the Gulf of Mexico near Sarasota, Florida. By
existing permanent special local regulations, these two race events
have nearly identical course and time characteristics, however one
event is held annually on the first Saturday of July and the other
event is held annually on the first Sunday of July. The sponsor has
decided to combine the events into a single day, reduced the length of
the racecourse, and modified the times of the event which would take
place annually on the first Sunday of July between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m.
(Eastern Daylight Time). These amended regulations are necessary to
provide for the safety of life for the participating vessels,
spectators, and mariners on the navigable waters of the United States
during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before June 6, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Coast Guard
Marine Safety Office Tampa, 155 Columbia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33606-
3598. The Waterways Management Division maintains the public docket for
this rulemaking. Comments and material received from the public, as
well as documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the
docket, will become part of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Tampa between
7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Junior Grade Jennifer
Andrew at Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Tampa (813) 228-2191 Ext
8203.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (CGD 07-05-
039), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to Coast Guard Marine Safety Office
Tampa at the address under ADDRESSES explaining why one would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Background and Purpose
The Annual Suncoast Offshore Challenge and Annual Offshore Grand
Prix in the Gulf of Mexico near Sarasota, Florida are governed by
permanent regulations at 33 CFR Sec. 100.719 and 33 CFR Sec. 100.720,
respectively, and are normally held on the first Saturday and Sunday of
July between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. Event coordinators have decided to
combine the two events to take place annually on the first Sunday of
July between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. Event coordinators are also reducing
the length of the racecourse which would allow for Big Sarasota Pass
channel to remain open during the event.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is necessary to accommodate the rescheduling of
the Annual Suncoast Offshore Challenge onto the date of the Annual
Suncoast Offshore Grand Prix race date and to modify the regulated area
to account for changes in the length of the racecourse. The proposed
rule would remove 33 CFR Sec. 100.719, the existing permanent
regulation for the Annual Suncoast Offshore Challenge scheduled for the
first Saturday in July. That event would be consolidated with 33 CFR
Sec. 100.720, the Annual Suncoast Offshore Grand Prix into a one-day
race event to be held on the already established Grand Prix race day,
annually on the first Sunday of July. The proposed termination time of
33 CFR Sec. 100.720 would change from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. Additionally,
the Coordinates of the regulated area would be modified to reflect a
reduced length in the racecourse and to open Big Sarasota Pass to
vessel traffic which is normally blocked under the existing special
local regulations.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. The proposed regulation would be
in effect for a limited time and is located in an area where vessel
traffic is limited.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule may affect the following
entities, some of which may be small entities: the owners and operators
of vessels intending to transit near to shore at Lido Key in Sarasota,
FL in the vicinity of Big Sarasota Pass and New Pass annually from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. on the first Sunday in July. This proposed rule would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities
[[Page 23947]]
since it will be in effect for a limited time in an area where vessel
traffic is limited.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. As a special local regulation issued in
conjunction with a boat race, this proposed rule satisfies the
requirements of paragraph (34)(h). Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h),
of the Instruction, an ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are not required for this rule.
Comments on this section will be considered before we make the final
decision on whether to categorically exclude this rule from further
environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
Sec. 100.719 [Removed]
2. Remove Sec. 100.719.
3. Revise Sec. 100.720 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.720 Annual Suncoast Offshore Grand Prix; Gulf of Mexico,
Sarasota, FL.
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area is established by a line
drawn from the start position 27[deg]18'22'' N, 82[deg]35'46'' W thence
to position 27[deg]16'30'' N, 82[deg]35'17'' W thence to position
27[deg]16'30'' N, 82[deg]35'02'' W thence to position 27[deg]18'18'' N,
82[deg]34'45'' W thence to position 27[deg]18'53'' N,
[[Page 23948]]
82[deg]35'04'' W thence to position 27[deg]18'47'' N, 82[deg]35'39'' W
thence back to the start position. All coordinates referenced use
datum: NAD 83.
(b) Special local regulations. (1) No anchoring will be permitted
seaward of the shoreside boundaries of the regulated area out to three
nautical miles from shore.
(2) Anchoring for spectators will be permitted shoreward of the
shoreside boundaries of the regulated area.
(3) All vessel traffic not involved with the Suncoast Offshore
Grand Prix, entering and exiting New Pass must exit at New Pass Channel
daybeacon 3 (27[deg]26'28'' N, 82[deg]41'42'' W, LLNR 18100)
and 4 (27[deg]26'24'' N, 82[deg]41'41'' W, LLNR 18105), and
must proceed in a northerly direction shoreward of spectator craft,
taking action to avoid a close-quarters situation until finally past
and clear of the racecourse. All coordinates referenced use datum: NAD
83.
(4) All vessel traffic not involved with the Suncoast Offshore
Grand Prix, entering and exiting Big Sarasota Pass Channel will be
allowed to transit only within the marked channel at Big Sarasota Pass
Channel, taking action to avoid a close-quarters situation until
finally past and clear of the racecourse.
(5) Entry within the regulated area is prohibited for all non-
participating vessels.
(c) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 10 a.m.
until 5 p.m. EDT, annually on the first Sunday of July.
Dated: April 19, 2005.
W. E. Justice,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Seventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 05-9079 Filed 5-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P