Technical Amendment to List of User Fee Airports, 22782-22783 [05-8658]
Download as PDF
22782
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 97)
establishes, amends, suspends, or
revokes Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures (SIAPs). The complete
regulatory description of each SIAP is
contained in official FAA form
documents which are incorporated by
reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and § 97.20
of the Federal Aviation Regulations
(FAR). The applicable FAA Forms are
identified as FAA Forms 8260–3, 8260–
4, and 8260–5. Materials incorporated
by reference are available for
examination or purchase as stated
above.
The large number of SIAPs, their
complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim
publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further,
airmen do not use the regulatory text of
the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic
depiction on charts printed by
publishers of aeronautical materials.
Thus, the advantages of incorporation
by reference are realized and
publication of the complete description
of each SIAP contained in FAA form
documents is unnecessary. The
provisions of this amendment state the
affected CFR (and FAR) sections, with
the types and effective dates of the
SIAPs. This amendment also identifies
the airport, its location, the procedure
identification and the amendment
number.
The Rule
This amendment to part 97 is effective
upon publication of each separate SIAP
as contained in the transmittal. Some
SIAP amendments may have been
previously issued by the FAA in a
National Flight Data Center (NFDC)
Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an
emergency action of immediate flight
safety relating directly to published
aeronautical charts. The circumstances
which created the need for some SIAP
amendments may require making them
effective in less than 30 days. For the
remaining SIAPs, an effective date at
least 30 days after publication is
provided.
Further, the SIAPs contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria
contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures
(TERPS). In developing these SIAPs, the
TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the
affected airports. Because of the close
and immediate relationship between
these SIAPs and safety in air commerce,
I find that notice and public procedure
before adopting these SIAPs are
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest and, where applicable, that
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:41 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
good cause exists for making some
SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.
Conclusion
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. It, therefore—(1) is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. For the same
reason, the FAA certifies that this
amendment will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97
Air Traffic Control, Airports,
Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (Air).
Issued in Washington, DC on April 22,
2005.
James J. Ballough,
Director, Flight Standards Service.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me, part 97 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 97) is
amended by establishing, amending,
suspending, or revoking Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures,
effective at 0901 UTC on the dates
specified, as follows:
I
PART 97—STANDARD INSTRUMENT
APPROACH PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 97
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106,
40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701,
44719, 44721–44722.
Taos, NM, Taos Rgnl, VOR/DME–B, Amdt 3
Taos, NM, Taos Rgnl, GPS RWY 4, ORIG–A,
CANCELLED
Batavia, OH, Clermont County, RNAV (GPS)
RWY 4, Orig
Batavia, OH, Clermont County, RNAV (GPS)
RWY 22, Orig
Batavia, OH, Clermont County, NDB RWY 22,
Amdt 1
Batavia, OH, Clermont County, VOR–B,
Amdt 7
Batavia, OH, Clermont County, GPS RWY 4,
Orig-A, CANCELLED
Cleveland, OH, Cleveland-Hopkins Intl, NDB
RWY 6R, Amdt 6
Okmulgee, OK, Okmulgee Regional, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 17, Orig
Okmulgee, OK, Okmulgee Regional, ILS OR
LOC RWY 17, Amdt 1
Okmulgee, OK, Okmulgee Regional, GPS
RWY 17, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Okmulgee, OK, Okmulgee Regional, NDB
RWY 17, Amdt 4
Okmulgee, OK, Okmulgee Regional, VOR–A,
Amdt 1
Perkasie, PA, Pennridge, VOR RWY 8, Amdt
2, CANCELLED
Selinsgrove, PA, Penn Valley, RNAV (GPS)–
B, Orig-A
Dyersburg, TN, Dyersburg Muni, VOR/DME
RWY 4, Amdt 3
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental
Arpt/Houston, NDB RWY 26L, Amdt 3,
CANCELLED
Mount Vernon, TX, Franklin County, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 13, Orig
Mount Vernon, TX, Franklin County, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 31, Orig
Rutland, VT, Rutland State, RNAV (GPS)
RWY 19, Orig-A
Boyceville, WI, Boyceville Muni, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 8, Amdt 1
Boyceville, WI, Boyceville Muni, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 26, Amdt 1
The FAA published an Amendment in
Docket No. 30443, Amdt No. 3120 to Part 97
of the Federal Aviation Regulations (Vol 70,
No.72, page 19880; dated April 15, 2005)
under section 97.33 effective 12 MAY 2005,
which is hereby rescinded:
Cleveland, OH, Cleveland-Hopkins Intl, LDA
PRM RWY 24L, Orig
Cleveland, OH, Cleveland-Hopkins Intl, ILS
PRM RWY 24R, Orig
[FR Doc. 05–8725 Filed 5–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
2. Part 97 is amended to read as
follows:
I
* * * Effective 09 Jun 2005
Eugene, OR, Mahlon Sweet Field, GPS RWY
3, Orig-B, CANCELLED
Eugene, OR, Mahlon Sweet Field, VOR/DME
OR TACAN RWY 3, Amdt 3B,
CANCELLED
* * * Effective 07 Jul 2005
Manila, AR, Manila Muni, NDB RWY 18,
Amdt 1, CANCELLED
Monroe, LA, Monroe Regional, ILS OR LOC
RWY 4, Amdt 22
Baudette, MN, Baudette Intl, RNAV (GPS)
RWY 30, Amdt 1
Taos, NM, Taos Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4,
Orig
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection
19 CFR Part 122
[CBP Dec. 05–16]
Technical Amendment to List of User
Fee Airports
Customs and Border Protection,
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Technical amendment.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\03MYR1.SGM
03MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
SUMMARY: This document amends the
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
Regulations to reflect the withdrawal of
the user fee airport designation at Ocala
International Airport in Ocala, Florida.
A user fee airport is one which, while
not qualifying for designation as an
international or landing rights airport,
has been approved by the Commissioner
of Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
to receive, for a fee, the services of a
CBP officer for the processing of aircraft
entering the United States and their
passengers and cargo.
DATES: Effective Date: May 3, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Dore, Office of Field Operations,
202–344–2776.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Generally, a civil aircraft arriving
from a place outside of the United States
is required to land at an airport
designated as an international airport.
Alternatively, the pilot of a civil aircraft
may request permission to land at a
specific airport and if landing rights are
granted, the civil aircraft may land at
that landing rights airport.
Section 236 of Pub. L. 98–573 (the
Trade and Tariff Act of 1984), codified
at 19 U.S.C. 58b, created an option for
civil aircraft desiring to land at an
airport other than an international or
landing rights airport. A civil aircraft
arriving from a place outside of the
United States may ask for permission to
land at an airport designated by the
Secretary of the Treasury as a user fee
airport.
Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 58b, an airport
may be designated as a user fee airport
if the Secretary of the Treasury
determines that the volume of business
at the airport is insufficient to justify the
availability of customs services at the
airport and the governor of the state in
which the airport is located approves
the designation. Generally, the type of
aircraft that would seek designation as
a user fee airport would be one at which
a company, such as an air courier
service, has a specialized interest in
regularly landing.
As the volume of business anticipated
at this type of airport is insufficient to
justify its designation as an
international or landing rights airport,
the availability of customs services is
not paid for out of appropriations from
the general treasury of the United States.
Instead, customs services are provided
on a fully reimbursable basis to be paid
for by the user fee airport on behalf of
the recipients of the services.
The fees which are to be charged at
user fee airports, according to the
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:45 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
statute, shall be paid by each person
using the customs services at the airport
and shall be in the amount equal to the
expenses incurred by the Secretary of
the Treasury in providing customs
services which are rendered to such
person at such airport, including the
salary and expenses of those employed
by the Secretary of the Treasury to
provide the customs services. To
implement this provision, generally, the
airport seeking the designation as a user
fee airport or that airport’s authority
agrees to pay a flat fee for which the
users of the airport are to reimburse the
airport/airport authority. The airport/
airport authority agrees to set and
periodically review the charges to
ensure that they are in accord with the
airport’s expenses.
Sections 403(1) and 411 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (‘‘the
Act,’’ Pub. L. 107–296) transferred the
United States Customs Service and
certain of its functions from the
Department of the Treasury to the
Department of Homeland Security;
pursuant to section 1502 of the Act, the
President renamed the ‘‘Customs
Service’’ as the ‘‘Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection,’’ also referred to as
‘‘CBP.’’
The Commissioner of CBP, pursuant
to § 122.15, CBP Regulations (19 CFR
122.15) designates airports as user fee
airports pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 58b.
Section 122.15 also sets forth the
grounds for withdrawal of a user fee
designation and sets forth the list of user
fee airports as designated by the
Commissioner.
This document revises the list of user
fee airports in § 122.15(b) by removing
Ocala International Airport. The
Commissioner approved the termination
of the User Fee Agreement between the
airport and CBP on June 22, 2004. The
airport had requested that the User Fee
Agreement be terminated.
This document is limited to technical
corrections of CBP regulations.
Accordingly, it is being signed under
the authrity of 19 CFR 0.1(b).
Regulatory Flexibility Act and
Executive Order 12866
Because no notice of proposed
rulemaking is required for this final
rule, the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do
not apply. Agency organization matters
such as this amendment are exempt
from consideration under Executive
Order 12866.
Inapplicability of Public Notice and
Delayed Effective Date Requirements
This amendment merely updates and
corrects the list of user fee airports
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22783
already designated by the Commissioner
of CBP in accordance with 19 U.S.C.
58b. Accordingly, this document neither
imposes any additional burdens on, nor
takes away any existing rights or
privileges from, the public, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Thus, notice and
public procedure are unnecessary, and
for the same reasons, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3) a delayed effective date
is not required.
Drafting Information
The principal author of this document
was Steven Bratcher, Regulations
Branch, Office of Regulations and
Rulings, CBP. However, personnel from
other offices participated in its
development.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 122
Air carriers, Aircraft, Airports,
Customs Duties and Inspection, Freight.
Amendments to the Regulations
Part 122, CBP Regulations (19 CFR Part
122) is amended as set forth below.
I
PART 122—AIR COMMERCE
REGULATIONS
1. The general authority citation for
Part 122, CBP Regulations, continues to
read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 58b, 66,
1431, 1433, 1436, 1448, 1459, 1590, 1594,
1623, 1624, 1644, 1644a, 2071 note.
*
*
*
*
*
2. The listing of user fee airports in
§ 122.15(b) is amended by removing, in
the ‘‘Location’’ column, ‘‘Ocala, Florida’’
and by removing on the same line, in the
‘‘Name’’ column, ‘‘Ocala International
Airport.’’
I
Dated: April 27, 2005.
Robert C. Bonner,
Commissioner, Customs and Border
Protection.
[FR Doc. 05–8658 Filed 5–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection
19 CFR Part 122
[CBP Dec. 05–15]
Technical Amendment to List of User
Fee Airports
Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Technical amendment.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\03MYR1.SGM
03MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 3, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22782-22783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-8658]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 122
[CBP Dec. 05-16]
Technical Amendment to List of User Fee Airports
AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection, Homeland Security.
ACTION: Technical amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 22783]]
SUMMARY: This document amends the Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
Regulations to reflect the withdrawal of the user fee airport
designation at Ocala International Airport in Ocala, Florida. A user
fee airport is one which, while not qualifying for designation as an
international or landing rights airport, has been approved by the
Commissioner of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to receive, for a
fee, the services of a CBP officer for the processing of aircraft
entering the United States and their passengers and cargo.
DATES: Effective Date: May 3, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Dore, Office of Field
Operations, 202-344-2776.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Generally, a civil aircraft arriving from a place outside of the
United States is required to land at an airport designated as an
international airport. Alternatively, the pilot of a civil aircraft may
request permission to land at a specific airport and if landing rights
are granted, the civil aircraft may land at that landing rights
airport.
Section 236 of Pub. L. 98-573 (the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984),
codified at 19 U.S.C. 58b, created an option for civil aircraft
desiring to land at an airport other than an international or landing
rights airport. A civil aircraft arriving from a place outside of the
United States may ask for permission to land at an airport designated
by the Secretary of the Treasury as a user fee airport.
Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 58b, an airport may be designated as a user
fee airport if the Secretary of the Treasury determines that the volume
of business at the airport is insufficient to justify the availability
of customs services at the airport and the governor of the state in
which the airport is located approves the designation. Generally, the
type of aircraft that would seek designation as a user fee airport
would be one at which a company, such as an air courier service, has a
specialized interest in regularly landing.
As the volume of business anticipated at this type of airport is
insufficient to justify its designation as an international or landing
rights airport, the availability of customs services is not paid for
out of appropriations from the general treasury of the United States.
Instead, customs services are provided on a fully reimbursable basis to
be paid for by the user fee airport on behalf of the recipients of the
services.
The fees which are to be charged at user fee airports, according to
the statute, shall be paid by each person using the customs services at
the airport and shall be in the amount equal to the expenses incurred
by the Secretary of the Treasury in providing customs services which
are rendered to such person at such airport, including the salary and
expenses of those employed by the Secretary of the Treasury to provide
the customs services. To implement this provision, generally, the
airport seeking the designation as a user fee airport or that airport's
authority agrees to pay a flat fee for which the users of the airport
are to reimburse the airport/airport authority. The airport/airport
authority agrees to set and periodically review the charges to ensure
that they are in accord with the airport's expenses.
Sections 403(1) and 411 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (``the
Act,'' Pub. L. 107-296) transferred the United States Customs Service
and certain of its functions from the Department of the Treasury to the
Department of Homeland Security; pursuant to section 1502 of the Act,
the President renamed the ``Customs Service'' as the ``Bureau of
Customs and Border Protection,'' also referred to as ``CBP.''
The Commissioner of CBP, pursuant to Sec. 122.15, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 122.15) designates airports as user fee airports pursuant to 19
U.S.C. 58b. Section 122.15 also sets forth the grounds for withdrawal
of a user fee designation and sets forth the list of user fee airports
as designated by the Commissioner.
This document revises the list of user fee airports in Sec.
122.15(b) by removing Ocala International Airport. The Commissioner
approved the termination of the User Fee Agreement between the airport
and CBP on June 22, 2004. The airport had requested that the User Fee
Agreement be terminated.
This document is limited to technical corrections of CBP
regulations. Accordingly, it is being signed under the authrity of 19
CFR 0.1(b).
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 12866
Because no notice of proposed rulemaking is required for this final
rule, the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply. Agency organization matters such as this amendment
are exempt from consideration under Executive Order 12866.
Inapplicability of Public Notice and Delayed Effective Date
Requirements
This amendment merely updates and corrects the list of user fee
airports already designated by the Commissioner of CBP in accordance
with 19 U.S.C. 58b. Accordingly, this document neither imposes any
additional burdens on, nor takes away any existing rights or privileges
from, the public, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Thus, notice and
public procedure are unnecessary, and for the same reasons, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) a delayed effective date is not required.
Drafting Information
The principal author of this document was Steven Bratcher,
Regulations Branch, Office of Regulations and Rulings, CBP. However,
personnel from other offices participated in its development.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 122
Air carriers, Aircraft, Airports, Customs Duties and Inspection,
Freight.
Amendments to the Regulations
0
Part 122, CBP Regulations (19 CFR Part 122) is amended as set forth
below.
PART 122--AIR COMMERCE REGULATIONS
0
1. The general authority citation for Part 122, CBP Regulations,
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 58b, 66, 1431, 1433, 1436,
1448, 1459, 1590, 1594, 1623, 1624, 1644, 1644a, 2071 note.
* * * * *
0
2. The listing of user fee airports in Sec. 122.15(b) is amended by
removing, in the ``Location'' column, ``Ocala, Florida'' and by
removing on the same line, in the ``Name'' column, ``Ocala
International Airport.''
Dated: April 27, 2005.
Robert C. Bonner,
Commissioner, Customs and Border Protection.
[FR Doc. 05-8658 Filed 5-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P