Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, 22306-22307 [05-8600]
Download as PDF
22306
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 82 / Friday, April 29, 2005 / Notices
revised rate schedule FERC No. 227, an
Electric Power Supply agreement
between Westar and the City of Axtell,
Kansas.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on
May 10, 2005.
Standard Paragraph
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Protests will be considered by
the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed on or before the
comment date. Anyone filing a motion
to intervene or protest must serve a copy
of that document on the Applicant and
all parties to this proceeding.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible online at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Linda Mitry,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–2055 Filed 4–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:04 Apr 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
National Nuclear Security
Administration
Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact
Statement for Continued Operation of
Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory and Supplemental
Stockpile Stewardship and
Management Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement
National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Livermore Site Office of
the Department of Energy’s (DOE)
National Nuclear Security
Administration (NNSA) announces the
availability of the Final Site-wide
Environmental Impact Statement for
Continued Operation of Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory (DOE/
EIS–0348) and Supplemental Stockpile
Stewardship and Management
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (DOE/EIS–0236-S3) (LLNL
SW/SPEIS). The Final LLNL SW/SPEIS
was prepared in accordance with the
Council on Environmental Quality’s
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Implementing Regulations (40
CFR Parts 1500–1508) and the DOE’s
NEPA Implementing Procedures (10
CFR Part 1021). The Final LLNL SW/
SPEIS analyzes the potential
environmental impacts associated with
continuing current Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory (LLNL) operations
and foreseeable new or modified
operations and facilities. The LLNL SW/
SWPEIS also evaluates the potential
environmental impacts of experiments
at the National Ignition Facility (NIF)
using plutonium, other fissile materials,
fissionable materials, and lithium
hydride. The Final LLNL SW/SPEIS
analyses a Proposed Action and two
alternatives, the No Action Alternative
and a Reduced Operation Alternative.
The No Action Alternative would
continue operation of current LLNL
programs in support of assigned
missions. The Proposed Action includes
operations discussed under the No
Action Alternative and new or
expanded operations in support of
reasonably foreseeable mission
requirements. The Reduced Operation
Alternative consists of a reduction of
activities compared to the No Action
Alternative. The NNSA has identified
the Proposed Action as the preferred
alternative in the Final LLNL SW/
SPEIS.
DATES: The NNSA intends to issue a
Record of Decision on the Final LLNL
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SW/SPEIS no sooner than 30 days after
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) publishes a notice of filing of the
Final LLNL SW/SPEIS in the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: The Final LLNL SW/SPEIS
is available on the LLNL Environmental
Community Relations Web site https://
www-envirinfo.llnl.gov/. For additional
information or a copy of the Final LLNL
SW/SPEIS or its Summary contact: Mr.
Thomas Grim, Document Manager,
National Nuclear Security
Administration, Livermore Site Office,
L–293, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore,
CA 94550–9234; phone (925) 422–0704
or toll free 1–877–388–4930; or by email (tom.grim@doeal.gov). The Final
LLNL SW/SPEIS is also available at the
following locations: the DOE Public
Reading Room in Room 1E–190, 1000
Independence Ave, SW., Washington,
DC 20585, (202) 586–3142; the LLNL
Public Reading Room in the LLNL
Visitors Center in Building 6525 located
at the East Gate Entrance off of
Greenville Road, Livermore, California,
(925) 424–4026; the Livermore Public
Library at 1000 South Livermore
Avenue, Livermore California, (925)
373–5500; and the Tracy Public Library
at 20 East Eaton Avenue, Tracy, CA,
(209) 831–4250.
For general information on the DOE
NEPA process, please contact: Ms. Carol
M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA
Policy and Compliance, EH–42, U.S.
DOE, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585, telephone 202–
586–4600, or leave a message at 1–800–
472–2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
continued operation of LLNL is critical
to NNSA’s Stockpile Stewardship
Program and to preventing the spread
and use of nuclear weapons worldwide.
LLNL maintains core competencies in
activities associated with research and
development, design, and surveillance
of nuclear weapons, as well as the
assessment and certification of their
safety and reliability. LLNL also
supports other DOE programs and
Federal agencies such as the Department
of Defense, the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, EPA, and the Department
of Homeland Security. The Final LLNL
SW/SPEIS analyzes the environmental
impacts of these operations.
LLNL was founded in 1952 as the
second nuclear weapons design
laboratory in order to promote
innovation in the design of our nation’s
nuclear stockpile. LLNL consists of two
sites: the Livermore Site located in
Livermore, California (Alameda
County); and Site 300, an experimental
test site located near Tracy, California,
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 82 / Friday, April 29, 2005 / Notices
(San Joaquin and Alameda counties).
The Livermore Site is the primary site
and is located approximately 40 miles
east of San Francisco in the Livermore
Valley on the east side of the city of
Livermore. Site 300 is located 15 miles
southeast of the city of Livermore
between Livermore and Tracy.
The alternatives evaluated in the
Final LLNL SW/SPEIS represent a range
of operation from the minimum level
that maintains core capabilities
(Reduced Operation Alternative) to the
highest reasonable activity levels that
could be supported by current facilities,
and the potential expansion and
construction of new facilities for
identified future actions (Proposed
Action). The No Action Alternative
would continue operation of current
LLNL programs in support of assigned
missions and includes approved interim
actions; facility construction, expansion,
or modification; and decontamination
and decommissioning projects for
which NEPA analysis and
documentation already exist. The
Proposed Action includes operations
discussed under the No Action
Alternative and the construction of new
facilities and expanded operations in
support of future mission requirements.
Specifically, the Proposed Action
includes increasing the administrative
and material-at-risk limits for plutonium
and tritium, and the use of nuclear
materials (plutonium, other fissile
materials, fissionable materials, and
lithium hydride) at the National Ignition
Facility. The Reduced Operation
Alternative represents a thirty percent
reduction of the Stockpile Stewardship
Program compared to the No Action
Alternative. The Reduced Operation
Alternative maintains full operational
readiness for NNSA facilities and
operations, but does not represent the
level of operation required to fulfill the
missions of the Stockpile Stewardship
Program assigned to LLNL. The NNSA
has identified the Proposed Action as its
preferred alternative in the Final LLNL
SW/SPEIS.
The Final LLNL SW/SPEIS contains
responses to comments received during
the public comment period, as well as
changes that were made to the Draft
LLNL SW/SPEIS in response to these
comments. The NNSA will consider the
analyses in the Final LLNL SW/SPEIS,
along with other information, in making
its decision regarding future operations
at LLNL.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:04 Apr 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
Issued in Washington, DC, this 10th day of
March 2005.
Linton F. Brooks,
Administrator, National Nuclear Security
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–8600 Filed 4–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6662–9]
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section
309 of the Clean Air Act and Section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act, as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
202–564–7167. An explanation of the
ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published
in the Federal Register dated April 1,
2005 (70 FR 16815).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20050006, ERP No. D1–FHW–
H40397–MO, Interstate 70 Corridor
Improvements, Section of
Independent Utility #4, from Missouri
Route BB Interchange to Eastern
Columbia, Funding, Boone County,
MO.
Summary: EPA has no objections to
the proposed project.
Rating LO
EIS No. 20040520, ERP No. D–DOE–
J39033–UT, Moab Uranium Mill
Trailings Remediation, Proposal To
Clean Up Surface Contamination and
Implement a Ground Water Strategy,
Grand and San Juan Counties, UT.
Summary: EPA rated the on-site
alternative environmentally
unsatisfactory because it would result in
continuing exceedances of water quality
criteria and it may not provide longterm pile stability. EPA has
environmental objections to the White
Mesa Mill site based on potential
inconsistency with Utah’s ground water
protection standards. EPA has
environmental concerns for the two
other alternatives regarding
transportation of the tailings to the site
and cap design.
Rating EU2
EIS No. 20040569, ERP No. D–NRC–
D03004–VA, Early Site Permit (ESP at
the North Anna Power Station ESP
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22307
Site (TAC No. MC1128), Construction
and Operation, NUREG–1811, Louisa
County, VA.
Summary: EPA has environmental
concerns based on the lack of
information on wetland and stream
impacts, the impact on the water
resource and the affects on the
downstream communities.
Rating EC2
EIS No. 20050018, ERP No. D–FAA–
F51050–IL, O’Hare Modernization
Program, Proposes Major
Development, Chicago O’Hare
International Airport, Airport Layout
Plan (ALP), Federal Funding, U.S.
Army COE Section 404 Permit, City of
Chicago, IL.
Summary: EPA expressed concerns
related to air quality (criteria pollutants
and hazardous air pollutants), wetlands,
stormwater, noise, and environmental
justice. EPA recommended additional
analysis for air (general conformity and
fine particulate matter (PM2.5)), noise
mitigation options, and environmental
justice. EPA recommended that the final
EIS contain mitigation commitments for:
increased mitigation ratios for wooded
wetlands, noise mitigation, specific air
mitigation measures targeting diesel
emissions during construction and
operation and hazardous air pollutants
associated with aircraft idling and
taxiing.
Rating EC2
EIS No. 20050021, ERP No. D–NRC–
F06025–WI, GENERIC—License
Renewal for Point Beach Nuclear
Plant, Units 1 and 2, Supplement 23
to NUREG–1437 (TAC Nos. MC2049
and MC2050), Lake
Michigan,Manitowoc County, WI.
Summary: EPA has environmental
concerns regarding the adequacy and
presentation of the radiological impacts
and risk estimates and entrainment of
fish and shellfish. In addition, impacts
to ground water, especially with respect
to on-site drinking water wells, are not
discussed.
Rating EC2
EIS No. 20050050, ERP No. D–COE–
D39028–00, TIER 1-DEIS Baltimore
Harbor and Channel Dredged Material
Management Plan (DMMP), To
Analyze Dredged Material Placement,
Port of Baltimore, Chesapeake Bay,
MD, PA, DE, WV, VA, DC, and NY.
Summary: EPA had no objections to
the ‘‘no action’’ alternative (i.e., the
continued use of Open Water Placement
in Virginia and the optimized use of
existing dredged material management
sites) and the new Alternative proposing
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 82 (Friday, April 29, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22306-22307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-8600]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
National Nuclear Security Administration
Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued
Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental
Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement
AGENCY: National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Livermore Site Office of the Department of Energy's (DOE)
National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) announces the
availability of the Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for
Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (DOE/EIS-
0348) and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0236-S3) (LLNL SW/
SPEIS). The Final LLNL SW/SPEIS was prepared in accordance with the
Council on Environmental Quality's National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Implementing Regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508) and the DOE's
NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR Part 1021). The Final LLNL SW/
SPEIS analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with
continuing current Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL)
operations and foreseeable new or modified operations and facilities.
The LLNL SW/SWPEIS also evaluates the potential environmental impacts
of experiments at the National Ignition Facility (NIF) using plutonium,
other fissile materials, fissionable materials, and lithium hydride.
The Final LLNL SW/SPEIS analyses a Proposed Action and two
alternatives, the No Action Alternative and a Reduced Operation
Alternative. The No Action Alternative would continue operation of
current LLNL programs in support of assigned missions. The Proposed
Action includes operations discussed under the No Action Alternative
and new or expanded operations in support of reasonably foreseeable
mission requirements. The Reduced Operation Alternative consists of a
reduction of activities compared to the No Action Alternative. The NNSA
has identified the Proposed Action as the preferred alternative in the
Final LLNL SW/SPEIS.
DATES: The NNSA intends to issue a Record of Decision on the Final LLNL
SW/SPEIS no sooner than 30 days after the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) publishes a notice of filing of the Final LLNL SW/SPEIS in
the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: The Final LLNL SW/SPEIS is available on the LLNL
Environmental Community Relations Web site https://www-
envirinfo.llnl.gov/. For additional information or a copy of the Final
LLNL SW/SPEIS or its Summary contact: Mr. Thomas Grim, Document
Manager, National Nuclear Security Administration, Livermore Site
Office, L-293, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550-9234; phone (925)
422-0704 or toll free 1-877-388-4930; or by e-mail
(tom.grim@doeal.gov). The Final LLNL SW/SPEIS is also available at the
following locations: the DOE Public Reading Room in Room 1E-190, 1000
Independence Ave, SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-3142; the LLNL
Public Reading Room in the LLNL Visitors Center in Building 6525
located at the East Gate Entrance off of Greenville Road, Livermore,
California, (925) 424-4026; the Livermore Public Library at 1000 South
Livermore Avenue, Livermore California, (925) 373-5500; and the Tracy
Public Library at 20 East Eaton Avenue, Tracy, CA, (209) 831-4250.
For general information on the DOE NEPA process, please contact:
Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance,
EH-42, U.S. DOE, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585,
telephone 202-586-4600, or leave a message at 1-800-472-2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The continued operation of LLNL is critical
to NNSA's Stockpile Stewardship Program and to preventing the spread
and use of nuclear weapons worldwide. LLNL maintains core competencies
in activities associated with research and development, design, and
surveillance of nuclear weapons, as well as the assessment and
certification of their safety and reliability. LLNL also supports other
DOE programs and Federal agencies such as the Department of Defense,
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, EPA, and the Department of Homeland
Security. The Final LLNL SW/SPEIS analyzes the environmental impacts of
these operations.
LLNL was founded in 1952 as the second nuclear weapons design
laboratory in order to promote innovation in the design of our nation's
nuclear stockpile. LLNL consists of two sites: the Livermore Site
located in Livermore, California (Alameda County); and Site 300, an
experimental test site located near Tracy, California,
[[Page 22307]]
(San Joaquin and Alameda counties). The Livermore Site is the primary
site and is located approximately 40 miles east of San Francisco in the
Livermore Valley on the east side of the city of Livermore. Site 300 is
located 15 miles southeast of the city of Livermore between Livermore
and Tracy.
The alternatives evaluated in the Final LLNL SW/SPEIS represent a
range of operation from the minimum level that maintains core
capabilities (Reduced Operation Alternative) to the highest reasonable
activity levels that could be supported by current facilities, and the
potential expansion and construction of new facilities for identified
future actions (Proposed Action). The No Action Alternative would
continue operation of current LLNL programs in support of assigned
missions and includes approved interim actions; facility construction,
expansion, or modification; and decontamination and decommissioning
projects for which NEPA analysis and documentation already exist. The
Proposed Action includes operations discussed under the No Action
Alternative and the construction of new facilities and expanded
operations in support of future mission requirements. Specifically, the
Proposed Action includes increasing the administrative and material-at-
risk limits for plutonium and tritium, and the use of nuclear materials
(plutonium, other fissile materials, fissionable materials, and lithium
hydride) at the National Ignition Facility. The Reduced Operation
Alternative represents a thirty percent reduction of the Stockpile
Stewardship Program compared to the No Action Alternative. The Reduced
Operation Alternative maintains full operational readiness for NNSA
facilities and operations, but does not represent the level of
operation required to fulfill the missions of the Stockpile Stewardship
Program assigned to LLNL. The NNSA has identified the Proposed Action
as its preferred alternative in the Final LLNL SW/SPEIS.
The Final LLNL SW/SPEIS contains responses to comments received
during the public comment period, as well as changes that were made to
the Draft LLNL SW/SPEIS in response to these comments. The NNSA will
consider the analyses in the Final LLNL SW/SPEIS, along with other
information, in making its decision regarding future operations at
LLNL.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 10th day of March 2005.
Linton F. Brooks,
Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-8600 Filed 4-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P