Tenaska Power Fund, L.P., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings, 22018-22023 [E5-2035]

Download as PDF 22018 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 81 / Thursday, April 28, 2005 / Notices following tariff sheets, to become effective April 15, 2005: (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Eighth Revised Sheet No. 373 Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 375 Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–2027 Filed 4–27–05; 8:45 am] Williston Basin states that it has revised the above-referenced tariff sheets found in section 48 of the general terms and conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, to rename two existing receipt points: Point ID No. 00880 (Bowdoin Whitewater to Whitewater) in Williston Basin’s Bowdoin Pool, and Point ID No. 04840 (Billy Creek Plant to Kinder Morgan-Billy Creek) in Williston Basin’s Billy Creek Pool. Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of the Commission’s regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call VerDate jul<14>2003 16:00 Apr 27, 2005 Jkt 205001 BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. RP05–274–000] Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff April 21, 2005. Take notice that on April 15, 2005, Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company (Williston Basin) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective May 15, 2005: of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–2028 Filed 4–27–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 206 Original Sheet No. 206A First Revised Sheet No. 207B Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Williston Basin states that it is proposing the tariff changes in order to provide additional flexibility for Williston Basin’s shippers and potential shippers by allowing such shippers the opportunity to request additional or new discounted services in conjunction with the evening and/or intra-day nomination cycles. Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of the Commission’s regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies [Docket No. EC05–68–000, et al.] PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Tenaska Power Fund, L.P., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings April 19, 2005. The following filings have been made with the Commission. The filings are listed in ascending order within each docket classification. 1. Tenaska Power Fund, L.P., TPF Calumet, LLC, Calumet Energy Team, LLC, CET Two, LLC [Docket No. EC05–68–000] Take notice that on April 14, 2005, Tenaska Power Fund, L.P. (Power Fund), TPF Calumet, LLC (TPF Calumet), Calumet Energy Team, LLC (CET), and CET Two, LLC (CET Two) (collectively, Applicants) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pursuant to section 203 of the Federal Power Act and Part 33 of the Commission’s regulations, an application authorizing TPF Calumet to purchase all of the membership interests in CET from CET Two. CET states it owns an approximately 300 MW electric generating facility located in Chicago, Illinois. Applicants request confidential treatment of certain parts of the Application. Applicants state that a copy of the filing was served on the Illinois Commerce Commission. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 5, 2005. E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 81 / Thursday, April 28, 2005 / Notices 22019 2. Pinnacle West Energy Corporation; Arizona Public Service Company 5. Brascan Power Piney & Deep Creek LLC 8. California Independent System Operator Corporation [Docket No. EC05–69–000] [Docket No. EG05–60–000] Take notice that on April 15, 2005, Brascan Power Piney & Deep Creek LLC (Brascan Power PDC) filed an application for a determination of exempt wholesale generator status pursuant to part 365 of the Commission’s regulations. Brascan Power PDC states that it is a Delaware limited liability company that will acquire and operate the Piney Hydroelectric Project (Project No. 309) and the Deep Creek Hydroelectric Project (formerly licensed by the Commission as Project No. 2370), from Reliant Energy Mid-Atlantic Power Holdings, LLC and Reliant Energy Maryland Holdings, LLC, respectively. Comment date: 5 p.m. eastern standard time on May 6, 2005. [Docket Nos. ER98–997–007, ER98–1309– 006, ER02–2297–006, and ER02–2298–006] Take notice that, on April 12, 2005, the California Independent System Operator Corporation (ISO) submitted a filing in compliance with the Commission’s ‘‘order ‘‘issued on February 11, 2005, in the aboveidentified dockets, 110 FERC ¶ 61,124. The ISO states that this filing has been served on all parties on the official service lists for the captioned dockets. In addition, the ISO is posting this filing on the ISO Home Page. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005. Take notice that on April 15, 2005, Pinnacle West Energy Corporation (PWEC) and Arizona Public Service Company (APS) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an application pursuant to section 203 of the Federal Power Act for authorization of a disposition by PWEC and the acquisition by APS of jurisdictional facilities. Applicants states that it seeks authorization for the transfer, directly or indirectly, by PWEC to APS of certain jurisdictional facilities, specifically the step-up transformers, tie lines, switchyard and associated jurisdictional facilities of the following generating units: Saguaro Combustion Turbine Unit 3 located in Red Rock, Arizona; West Phoenix Combined Cycle Unit 4 located in Phoenix, Arizona; West Phoenix Combined Cycle Unit 5 located in Phoenix, Arizona; Redhawk Combined Cycle Unit 1 located in Arlington, Arizona; and Redhawk Combined Cycle Unit 2 located in Arlington, Arizona. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 6, 2005. 3. FPL Energy Horse Hollow Wind, LP [Docket No. EG05–58–000] Take notice that on April 13, 2005, FPL Energy Horse Hollow Wind, LP (FPLE Horse Hollow), filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an application for determination of exempt wholesale generator status pursuant to part 365 of the Commission’s regulations. FPLE Horse Hollow states it will own an approximate wind-powered generating facility of up to 305 MW located in Taylor County, Texas. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 4, 2005. 4. San Joaquin Cogen, L.L.C. [Docket No. EG05–59–000] Take notice that on April 14, 2005, San Joaquin Cogen, L.L.C. (San Joaquin), filed with the Commission an application for prospective determination of exempt wholesale generator status pursuant to part 365 of the Commission’s regulations. San Joaquin states that it is a limited liability company, organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, and engaged directly and exclusively in owning and operating the San Juaquin Cogen, L.L.C. electric generating facility located in Lathrop, California, and selling electric energy at wholesale from the facility. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 5, 2005. VerDate jul<14>2003 16:00 Apr 27, 2005 Jkt 205001 6. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation; Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation [Docket Nos. ER97–1523–084, OA97–470– 076, ER97–4234–074, and OA96–194–012] Take notice that April 12, 2005, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, a National Grid Company, and the New York Independent System Operator, Inc. jointly submit this compliance filing pursuant to the Commission’s Order Approving Uncontested Settlement Agreement issued on March 25, 2005 in the above-referenced proceedings. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005. 7. Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company; OGE Energy Resources, Inc. [Docket Nos. ER98–511–004 and ER97–4345– 016] Take notice that on April 11, 2005, Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company (OG&E) and OGE Energy Resources, Inc. (OERI) submitted blacklined versions of the market-based rate tariffs of Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company (FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 3) and OGE Energy Resources, Inc. (Second Revised Rate Schedule FERC No. 1) originally filed on February 7, 2005 in Docket Nos. ER98–511–013 and ER97–4345–015. OG&E states that copies of the filing were served upon all parties in Docket Nos. ER98–511–000 and ER97–4345– 000. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 2, 2005. PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 9. UGI Development Company [Docket No. ER99–2817–003] Take notice that on April 12, 2005, UGI Development Company filed its market-based rate update pursuant to the Commission’s Order in AEP Power Marketing, Inc. et al., 107 FERC ¶ 61,018 (2004). Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005. 10. Casco Bay Energy Company, LLC [Docket No. ER99–3822–006] Take notice that, on April 12, 2005, Casco Bay Energy Company, LLC submitted for filing revisions to its market-based rate tariff, designated as FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, to include the change in status reporting requirements adopted in Reporting Requirement for Changes in Status for Public Utilities With MarketBased Rate Authority, Order No. 652, 110 FERC ¶ 61,097 (2005). Casco Bay states that copies of the filing were served upon the parties on the official service list in the abovecaptioned proceeding. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005. 11. Pinnacle West Capital Corporation; Arizona Public Service Company; Pinnacle West Energy Corporation; APS Energy Services Company, Inc. [Docket Nos. ER00–2268–011, EL05–10–003, ER99–4124–009, EL05–11–003, ER00–3312– 010, EL05–12–003, ER99–4122–012, and EL05–13–003] Take notice that on April 11, 2005, Arizona Public Service Company (APS) and Electrical District Number Seven of Maricopa County, Roosevelt Irrigation District, Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District, Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One, Aguila Irrigation District, Harquahala Valley Power District, Electrical District Number Eight of E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 22020 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 81 / Thursday, April 28, 2005 / Notices Maricopa County, McMullen Valley Water Conservation and Drainage District, Tonopah Irrigation District, and Electrical District Number 6 of Pinal County (collectively the Majority Districts), submitted a Settlement Agreement in order to resolve issued raised by the Majority Districts concerning APS’ market-based rates. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 2, 2005. 12. Otter Tail Power Company Corp. (Ontario Energy) submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission’s new interim generation market power screens issued on April 14, 2004 in AEP Power Marketing Inc., et al., 107 FERC ¶ 61,018 (2004), order on reh’g., 108 FERC ¶ 61,026 (2004). Ontario Energy states that copies of the filing were served on parties on the official service list in Docket No. ER02– 1021–000. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 2, 2005. [Docket No. ER00–3080–002] 16. Entergy Services, Inc. Take notice that on April 11, 2005, Otter Tail Power Company (Otter Tail) submitted its updated market analysis as required by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s orders in AEP Power Marketing, Inc. 107 FERC ¶ 61,018, order on reh’g, 108 FERC ¶ 61,026 (2004). Otter Tail states that copies of the public version of this filing have been served on all parties to the proceeding captioned above, as well as the state commissions of Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 2, 2005. [Docket No. ER03–811–003] Take notice that on April 12, 2005, Entergy Services, Inc., on behalf of Entergy Louisiana, Inc., tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, a compliance Interconnection and Operating Agreement with Occidental Chemical Corporation in response to the Commission’s December 22, 2004, order in Entergy Services, Inc., 109 FERC ¶ 61,342 (2004), reh’g denied, 110 FERC ¶ 61,365 (2005). Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005. 13. Mill Run Windpower, LLC 17. California Independent System Operator Corporation [Docket Nos. ER01–1710–005 and ER05–660– 001] [Docket No. ER05–416–004] Take notice that on April 15, 2005, Mill Run Windpower, LLC (Mill Run) filed a supplement to its February 28, 2005 filing in Docket Nos. ER01–1710– 004 and ER05–660–000. Mill Run states that copies of the filing were served on parties on the official service lists for Docket Nos. ER01–1710 and ER05–660 and on the Florida Public Service Commission. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 22, 2005. 14. Somerset Windpower, LLC [Docket Nos. ER01–2139–006 and ER05–661– 001] Take notice that, on April 15, 2005, Somerset Windpower, LLC (Mill Run) filed a supplement to its February 28, 2005 filing in Docket Nos. ER01–2139– 005 and ER05–661–000. Mill Run states that copies of the filing were served on parties on the official service list for Docket Nos. ER01–2139 and ER05–661 and on the Florida Public Service Commission. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 22, 2005. 15. Ontario Energy Trading International Corp. [Docket No. ER02–1021–004] Take notice that on April 11, 2005, Ontario Energy Trading International VerDate jul<14>2003 16:00 Apr 27, 2005 Jkt 205001 Take notice that, on April 12, 2005, the California Independent System Operator Corporation (ISO) submitted an informational filing regarding to the ISO’s updated transmission Access Charge rates effective as of January 1, 2005. The ISO states that this filing has been served upon the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, the California Energy Commission, the California Electricity Oversight Board, the Participating Transmission Owners, and upon all parties with effective Scheduling Coordinator Service Agreements under the ISO Tariff. In addition, ISO states it is posting the filing on the ISO Home Page. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005. 18. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. [Docket No. ER05–579–000] Take notice that on April 8, 2005 Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted for filing a withdrawal of its February 15, 2005 filing of Amendment No. 1 to the Generation-Transmission Interconnection Agreement among Wisconsin Electric Power Company, the Midwest ISO and American Transmission Company LLC for the Elm Road Generating Facility. PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Midwest ISO states that it has served the foregoing document upon each person designated on the official service list compiled by the Secretary in the above-captioned proceeding. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005. 19. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. [Docket No. ER05–590–000] Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted for filing a withdrawal of its February 16, 2005 filing of Amendment No. 1 to the Generation-Transmission Interconnection Agreement among Wisconsin Electric Power Company, the Midwest ISO and American Transmission Company LLC for the Port Washington Generating Facility. Midwest ISO states that it has served the foregoing document upon each person designated on the official service list compiled by the Secretary in the above-captioned proceeding. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005. 20. Gexa Energy LLC [Docket No. ER05–714–001] Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Gexa Energy LLC (Gexa), filed an amendment to its March 21, 2005 petition requesting Commission acceptance of Gexa’s Rate Schedule FERC No. 1; the granting of certain blanket approvals, including the authority to sell electricity at marketbased rates; and the waiver of certain Commission regulations. Comment Date: 5 p.m eastern time on April 29, 2005. 21. ISO New England Inc. [Docket No. ER05–767–001] Take notice that on April 15, 2005, ISO New England Inc. (the ISO) submitted for filing a motion for expedited consideration and to revise the effective date requested in the Amendments to Appendix A of Market Rule 1 Regarding Reference Price Calculations, filed in this proceeding jointly by the ISO and the New England Power Pool Participants Committee on April 1, 2005. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 22, 2005. 22. California Independent System Operator Corporation [Docket No. ER05–796–000] Take notice that on April 8, 2005, the California Independent System Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered for filing an amendment to the ISO Tariff E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 81 / Thursday, April 28, 2005 / Notices (Amendment No. 67) for acceptance by the Commission. The ISO states that the purpose of Amendment No. 67 is to revise the ISO Tariff provisions concerning the deadline for submitting supplemental energy bids to the CAISO, to provide for a deadline of 62 minutes prior to the operating hour rather than 60 minutes prior to the operating hour as currently stated in the ISO Tariff. The ISO requests an effective date of April 9, 2005. The ISO states that this filing has been served on the California Public Utilities Commission, the California Energy Commission, the California Electricity Oversight Board, all parties with effective Scheduling Coordinator Service Agreements under the ISO Tariff, and all parties in Docket No. EL04–132. In addition, the ISO states that it has posted the filing on its Web site. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005. 23. Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. [Docket No. ER05–797–000] Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (O&R) tendered for filing an amendment to its open access transmission tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 3. O&R states that the filing proposes a surcharge mechanism applicable to costs associated with the undergrounding of existing transmission facilities at the request or requirement of municipal governmental authorities. O&R requests an effective date of May 1, 2005. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005. 24. Virtual Energy, Inc. [Docket No. ER05–798–000] Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Virtual Energy, Inc. (Virtual Energy) petitioned the Commission for acceptance of Virtual Energy, Inc. Rate Schedule FERC No. 1, under which Virtual Energy will engage in wholesale electric power and energy transactions as a marketer; the granting of certain blanket approvals, including the authority to sell electricity at market based rates; and the waiver of certain Commission regulations. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005. 25. Southwest Power Pool, Inc. [Docket No. ER05–799–000] Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP) submitted for filing a partially executed service agreement for network integration transmission service (service VerDate jul<14>2003 16:00 Apr 27, 2005 Jkt 205001 agreement) between SPP and Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority (OMPA), as well as an executed Network Operating Agreement (NOA) between SPP, OMPA and Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company (OKGE). SPP requests an effective date of April 1, 2005. SPP states that both OMPA and OKGE were served with a copy of this filing. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005. 26. Mirabito Gas & Electric, Inc. [Docket No. ER05–800–000] Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Mirabito Gas & Electric, Inc. (Marabito) filed a Notice of Cancellation of its market-based rate authority in Docket No. ER00–3717–000, effective December 8, 2000. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005. 27. Naniwa Energy LLC [Docket No. ER05–801–000] Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Naniwa Energy LLC (Naniwa) submitted Notices of Cancellation of Service Agreement Nos. 1 and 2 under Naniwa’s FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, effective July 20, 2004. Naniwa states that all consents have been obtained for such cancellation and that a copy of this filing has been served upon the customers under the service agreements. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005. 28. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. [Docket No. ER05–802–000] Take notice that on April 8, 2005, the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted, pursuant to section 205 of the Federal Power Act, revisions to the Midwest ISO’s open access transmission and energy markets tariff to address several issues related to financial transmission rights. The Midwest ISO requests and effective date of May 6, 2005. The Midwest ISO has requested waiver of the service requirements set forth in 18 CFR § 385.2010. The Midwest ISO states that it has electronically served a copy of this filing, with attachments, upon all Tariff Customers under the EMT, Midwest ISO Members, Member representatives of Transmission Owners and NonTransmission Owners, the Midwest ISO Advisory Committee participants, as well as all state commissions within the region. In addition, the Midwest ISO states that the filing has been electronically posted on the Midwest PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22021 ISO’s Web site at https:// www.midwestiso.org under the heading ‘‘Filings to FERC’’ for other interested parties in this matter. The Midwest ISO further states that it will provide hard copies to any interested parties upon request. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005. 29. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. [Docket No. ER05–803–000] Take notice that, on April 8, 2005, the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted proposed revisions to Attachment H–1 (Index of Interconnection Agreement Customers) of its energy markets tariff to reflect the addition of an interconnection agreement to be executed between Indiana & Michigan, Northern Indiana Public Service Company, PJM Interconnection, Inc. and the Midwest ISO as Service Agreement No. 1524 in compliance with the Commission’s March 9, 2005 Order Conditionally Accepting Filing and Instituting section 206 Proceeding, 110 FERC ¶ 61,276 (2005). The Midwest ISO states that copies of the filing were served on parties on the official service list in Docket Nos. ER05– 31–000 and EL05–70–000. In addition, the Midwest ISO states that it has served a copy of this filing electronically, including attachments, upon all Tariff Customers under the EMT, Midwest ISO Members, Member representatives of Transmission Owners and NonTransmission Owners, the Midwest ISO Advisory Committee participants, as well as all state commissions within the region. The Midwest ISO further states that the filing has also been posted electronically on the Midwest ISO’s Web site at https://www.midwestiso.org under the heading ‘‘Filings to FERC’’ for other interested parties in this matter. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005. 30. Southern California Edison Company [Docket No. ER05–804–000] Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Southern California Edison Company (SCE) submitted for filing an Interconnection Facilities Agreement (Interconnection Agreement), Service Agreement No. 137 under SCE’s Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT), FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 5, and an associated Service Agreement for Wholesale Distribution Service (WDAT Service Agreement), Service Agreement E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 22022 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 81 / Thursday, April 28, 2005 / Notices No. 138 under the WDAT, between SCE and the City of Moreno Valley (Moreno Valley). SCE states that the purpose of the Interconnection Agreement and the WDAT Service Agreement is to specify the terms and conditions under which SCE will provide Wholesale Distribution Service from the California Independent System Operator Controlled Grid at SCE’s Valley Substation to a new Moreno Valley 12 kV interconnection at Moreno Valley owned property located on the southwest corner of Cottonwood Avenue and Redlands Boulevard in Riverside County, California. SCE states that copies of the filing were served upon the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California and Moreno Valley. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005. 31. Westar Energy, Inc. [Docket No. ER05–805–000] Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Westar Energy, Inc. (Westar) submitted for filing a Notice of Cancellation for Rate Schedule FERC No. 230, an Electric Power Supply Agreement between Westar and the City of Enterprise, Kansas. Westar states that copies of the filing were served upon the Kansas Corporation Commission and the City of Enterprise, Kansas. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005. 32. Westar Energy, Inc. [Docket No. ER05–806–000] Take notice that on April 11, 2005, Kansas Gas and Electric Company and Westar Energy, Inc. (collectively Westar Energy) submitted for filing a Notice of Cancellation for Rate Schedules FERC Nos. 193, 195, 196, 197 and 198, Generating Municipal Electric Service Agreements between Westar Energy and the City of Burlington, Kansas; City of Mulvane, Kansas; City of Neodesha, Kansas; City of Wellington, Kansas and the City of Winfield, Kansas. Westar Energy states that copies of the filing were served upon the City of Burlington, Kansas; City of Mulvane, Kansas, City of Neodesha, Kansas, City of Wellington, Kansas; City of Winfield, Kansas and the Kansas Corporation Commission. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 2, 2005. 33. Pacific Gas and Electric Company [Docket No. ER05–807–000] Take notice that on April 11, 2005, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) tendered for filing a Generator VerDate jul<14>2003 16:00 Apr 27, 2005 Jkt 205001 Special Facilities Agreement (GSFA), and Generator Interconnection Agreement (GIA) between PG&E and Diablo Winds, LLC (Diablo Winds) (collectively, Parties). PG&E states that the GSFA permits PG&E to recover the ongoing costs associated with owning, operating and maintaining the Special Facilities for the Parties. PG&E states that the GIA provides terms and conditions for billing, operation, maintenance and metering. PG&E further states that as detailed in the GSFA, PG&E proposes to charge Diablo Winds a monthly Cost-of-Ownership Charge equal to the rate for transmission-level, customer-financed facilities. PG&E states that copies of this filing have been served upon Diablo Winds, California Independent System Operator Corporation and the California Public Utilities Commission. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 2, 2005. 34. Eagle Point Cogeneration Partnership [Docket No. ER05–808–000] Take notice that on April 11, 2005, pursuant to section 35.15, 18 CFR 35.15 (2004), of the Commission’s Regulations, Eagle Point Cogeneration Partnership (Eagle Point) filed with the Commission a Notice of Cancellation of market-based rate authority under the applicant’s FERC Electric Tariff, Revised Volume No. 1. Eagle Point requests an effective date of April 11, 2005. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 2, 2005. 35. Midwest Independent Transmission [Docket No. ER05–809–000] Take notice that on April 12, 2005 the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted, pursuant to section 205 of the Federal Power Act, revisions to section 7 (Billing and Payments; Defaults and Remedies) and Attachment L (Credit Policy) of the Midwest ISO’s Open Access Transmission and Energy Markets Tariff. The Midwest ISO has requested June 11, 2005 as the effective date for the tariff sheets submitted as part of this filing. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005. 36. UGI Energy Services, Inc. [Docket No. ER05–810–000] Take notice that on April 12, 2005, UGI Energy Services, Inc. filed a wholesale power sales tariff to sell capacity, energy, and certain ancillary services at market-based rates. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005. PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 37. New England Power Pool; ISO New England Inc. [Docket Nos. ER05–811–000 and PL05–3– 000] Take notice that on April 12, 2005, ISO New England Inc. (the ISO) and the New England Power Pool (NEPOOL) Participants Committee jointly filed for acceptance amendments (the Amendments) to the ISO Financial Assurance Policy for Market Participants, the ISO Financial Assurance Policy for Non-Market Participant Transmission Customers, and the ISO Financial Assurance Policy for Non-Market Participant FTR Customers and Non-Market Participant Demand Response Providers, which are, respectively, Exhibits 1A, 1B & 1C to Section I of the ISO Transmission, Markets and Services Tariff. A June 1, 2005 effective date for the filed changes is requested. The ISO states that they also filed the Amendments as an update to its prior compliance filing in Docket No. PL05–3–000. NEPOOL and the ISO state that copies of these materials were sent to the New England state governors and regulatory commissions and all customers under the ISO Transmission, Markets and Services Tariff. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005. 38. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. [Docket No. ER05–812–000] Take notice that on April 12, 2005, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Con Edison) tendered for filing amendments to Con Edison’s Delivery Rate Schedule No. 96 (PASNY Tariff) and Economic Development Delivery Service Rate Schedule No. 92 (EDDS Tariff). Con Edison states that the filing proposes to revise the rates, terms, and conditions for delivery services that Con Edison provides under contracts with the New York Power Authority, the County of Westchester Public Utility Service Agency, and the New York City Public Utility Service. Con Edison requests that the proposed amendments be made effective on April 1, 2005. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005. Standard Paragraph Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 81 / Thursday, April 28, 2005 / Notices the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant and all parties to this proceeding. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–2035 Filed 4–27–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. ER01–1527–006, et al.] Sierra Pacific Power Company, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings April 20, 2005. The following filings have been made with the Commission. The filings are listed in ascending order within each docket classification. 1. Sierra Pacific Power Company; Nevada Power Company [Docket Nos. ER01–1527–006 and ER01– 1529–006] Take notice that on March 3, 2005, Sierra Pacific Power Company and Nevada Power Company (collectively, Sierra) submitted a response to recent Commission staff inquiries regarding Sierra’s triennial market power study filed October 28, 2004, as supplemented on November 12, 2004. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 2, 2005. VerDate jul<14>2003 16:00 Apr 27, 2005 Jkt 205001 2. Somerset Windpower, LLC [Docket Nos. ER01–2139–006 and ER05–661– 001] Take notice that, on April 15, 2005, Somerset Windpower, LLC (Somerset) filed a supplement to its February 28, 2005 filing in Docket Nos. ER01–2139– 005 and ER05–661–000. Somerset states that copies of the filing were served on parties on the official service list for Docket Nos. ER01–2139 and ER05–661 and on the Florida Public Service Commission. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 22, 2005. 3. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. [Docket Nos. ER04–691–035 and EL04–104– 033] Take notice that on April 14, 2005 the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted its errata filing to its April 6, 2005 filing in Docket Nos. ER04–691– 034 and EL04–104–032. The Midwest ISO requests an effective date of April 1, 2005 for the tariff sheets submitted as part of this filing. The Midwest ISO states that it has electronically served a copy of this filing, with attachments, upon all Midwest ISO Members, Member representatives of Transmission Owners and Non-Transmission Owners, the Midwest ISO Advisory Committee participants, as well as all State commissions within the region. In addition, the Midwest ISO states that the filing has been electronically posted on the Midwest ISO’s Web site at https://www.midwestiso.org under the heading ‘‘Filings to FERC’’ for other interested parties in this matter. The Midwest ISO indicates that it will provide hard copies to any interested parties upon request. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 5, 2005. 4. Georgia Power Company [Docket Nos. ER05–282–001 and ER04–939– 002] Take notice that on April 14, 2005, Georgia Power Company (Georgia Power) resubmitted the Control Area Compact by and among Georgia Power Company, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, and Georgia System Operations Corporation (Control Area Compact), accepted by the Commission’s letter order issued January 27, 2005 in the above captioned dockets, to reflect a rate schedule designation and other information in accordance with section 35.9 of the Commission’s regulations, 18 CFR 35.9 (2004). Georgia Power Company also PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22023 submitted a Notice of Termination of the Revised and Restated Coordination Services Agreement Between and Among Georgia Power Company, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, and Georgia System Operations Corporation, which has been supplanted by the Control Area Compact. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 5, 2005. 5. Saracen Energy LP [Docket No. ER05–493–001] Take notice that on April 14, 2005, Saracen Energy LP (Saracen Energy) submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission’s March 24, 2005 order in this proceeding, 110 FERC ¶ 61,332 (2005). Saracen Energy states that the compliance filing consists of an amendment to Saracen Energy’s Rate Schedule FERC No. 1 to reflect the change-in-status reporting requirement adopted in Order No. 652, Reporting Requirement for Change in Status for Public Utilities with Market-Based Rate Authority, 110 FERC ¶ 61,097 (2005). Saracen Energy states that copies of the filing were served on parties on the official service list in the abovecaptioned proceeding. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 5, 2005. 6. Saracen Energy Power Advisors LP [Docket No. ER05–494–001] Take notice that on April 14, 2005, Saracen Energy Power Advisors LP (Saracen Power Advisors) submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission’s March 24, 2005 order in this proceeding, 110 FERC ¶ 61,332 (2005). Saracen states that the compliance filing consists of an amendment to Saracen Power Advisors’s Rate Schedule FERC No. 1 to reflect the change-in-status reporting requirement adopted in Order No. 652, Reporting Requirement for Change in Status for Public Utilities with MarketBased Rate Authority, 110 FERC ¶ 61,097 (2005). Saracen Power Advisors states that copies of the filing were served on parties on the official service list in the above-captioned proceeding. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 5, 2005. 7. Saracen Merchant Energy LP [Docket No. ER05–495–001] Take notice that, on April 14, 2005, Saracen Merchant Energy LP (Saracen Merchant) submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission’s March 24, 2005 order in this proceeding, 110 FERC ¶ 61,332 (2005). Saracen Merchant states that the E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 81 (Thursday, April 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22018-22023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-2035]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EC05-68-000, et al.]


Tenaska Power Fund, L.P., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate 
Filings

April 19, 2005.
    The following filings have been made with the Commission. The 
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket 
classification.

1. Tenaska Power Fund, L.P., TPF Calumet, LLC, Calumet Energy Team, 
LLC, CET Two, LLC

[Docket No. EC05-68-000]

    Take notice that on April 14, 2005, Tenaska Power Fund, L.P. (Power 
Fund), TPF Calumet, LLC (TPF Calumet), Calumet Energy Team, LLC (CET), 
and CET Two, LLC (CET Two) (collectively, Applicants) tendered for 
filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pursuant to 
section 203 of the Federal Power Act and Part 33 of the Commission's 
regulations, an application authorizing TPF Calumet to purchase all of 
the membership interests in CET from CET Two. CET states it owns an 
approximately 300 MW electric generating facility located in Chicago, 
Illinois. Applicants request confidential treatment of certain parts of 
the Application.
    Applicants state that a copy of the filing was served on the 
Illinois Commerce Commission.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 5, 2005.

[[Page 22019]]

2. Pinnacle West Energy Corporation; Arizona Public Service Company

[Docket No. EC05-69-000]

    Take notice that on April 15, 2005, Pinnacle West Energy 
Corporation (PWEC) and Arizona Public Service Company (APS) filed with 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an application pursuant to 
section 203 of the Federal Power Act for authorization of a disposition 
by PWEC and the acquisition by APS of jurisdictional facilities. 
Applicants states that it seeks authorization for the transfer, 
directly or indirectly, by PWEC to APS of certain jurisdictional 
facilities, specifically the step-up transformers, tie lines, 
switchyard and associated jurisdictional facilities of the following 
generating units: Saguaro Combustion Turbine Unit 3 located in Red 
Rock, Arizona; West Phoenix Combined Cycle Unit 4 located in Phoenix, 
Arizona; West Phoenix Combined Cycle Unit 5 located in Phoenix, 
Arizona; Redhawk Combined Cycle Unit 1 located in Arlington, Arizona; 
and Redhawk Combined Cycle Unit 2 located in Arlington, Arizona.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 6, 2005.

3. FPL Energy Horse Hollow Wind, LP

[Docket No. EG05-58-000]

    Take notice that on April 13, 2005, FPL Energy Horse Hollow Wind, 
LP (FPLE Horse Hollow), filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission an application for determination of exempt wholesale 
generator status pursuant to part 365 of the Commission's regulations.
    FPLE Horse Hollow states it will own an approximate wind-powered 
generating facility of up to 305 MW located in Taylor County, Texas.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 4, 2005.

4. San Joaquin Cogen, L.L.C.

[Docket No. EG05-59-000]

    Take notice that on April 14, 2005, San Joaquin Cogen, L.L.C. (San 
Joaquin), filed with the Commission an application for prospective 
determination of exempt wholesale generator status pursuant to part 365 
of the Commission's regulations.
    San Joaquin states that it is a limited liability company, 
organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, and engaged directly 
and exclusively in owning and operating the San Juaquin Cogen, L.L.C. 
electric generating facility located in Lathrop, California, and 
selling electric energy at wholesale from the facility.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 5, 2005.

5. Brascan Power Piney & Deep Creek LLC

[Docket No. EG05-60-000]

    Take notice that on April 15, 2005, Brascan Power Piney & Deep 
Creek LLC (Brascan Power PDC) filed an application for a determination 
of exempt wholesale generator status pursuant to part 365 of the 
Commission's regulations. Brascan Power PDC states that it is a 
Delaware limited liability company that will acquire and operate the 
Piney Hydroelectric Project (Project No. 309) and the Deep Creek 
Hydroelectric Project (formerly licensed by the Commission as Project 
No. 2370), from Reliant Energy Mid-Atlantic Power Holdings, LLC and 
Reliant Energy Maryland Holdings, LLC, respectively.
    Comment date: 5 p.m. eastern standard time on May 6, 2005.

6. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation; Niagara Mohawk Power 
Corporation

[Docket Nos. ER97-1523-084, OA97-470-076, ER97-4234-074, and OA96-194-
012]

    Take notice that April 12, 2005, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, 
a National Grid Company, and the New York Independent System Operator, 
Inc. jointly submit this compliance filing pursuant to the Commission's 
Order Approving Uncontested Settlement Agreement issued on March 25, 
2005 in the above-referenced proceedings.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005.

7. Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company; OGE Energy Resources, Inc.

[Docket Nos. ER98-511-004 and ER97-4345-016]

    Take notice that on April 11, 2005, Oklahoma Gas and Electric 
Company (OG&E) and OGE Energy Resources, Inc. (OERI) submitted 
blacklined versions of the market-based rate tariffs of Oklahoma Gas 
and Electric Company (FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 3) 
and OGE Energy Resources, Inc. (Second Revised Rate Schedule FERC No. 
1) originally filed on February 7, 2005 in Docket Nos. ER98-511-013 and 
ER97-4345-015.
    OG&E states that copies of the filing were served upon all parties 
in Docket Nos. ER98-511-000 and ER97-4345-000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 2, 2005.

8. California Independent System Operator Corporation

[Docket Nos. ER98-997-007, ER98-1309-006, ER02-2297-006, and ER02-2298-
006]

    Take notice that, on April 12, 2005, the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation (ISO) submitted a filing in compliance with 
the Commission's ``order `` issued on February 11, 2005, in the above-
identified dockets, 110 FERC ] 61,124.
    The ISO states that this filing has been served on all parties on 
the official service lists for the captioned dockets. In addition, the 
ISO is posting this filing on the ISO Home Page.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005.

9. UGI Development Company

[Docket No. ER99-2817-003]

    Take notice that on April 12, 2005, UGI Development Company filed 
its market-based rate update pursuant to the Commission's Order in AEP 
Power Marketing, Inc. et al., 107 FERC ] 61,018 (2004).
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005.

10. Casco Bay Energy Company, LLC

[Docket No. ER99-3822-006]

    Take notice that, on April 12, 2005, Casco Bay Energy Company, LLC 
submitted for filing revisions to its market-based rate tariff, 
designated as FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, to include 
the change in status reporting requirements adopted in Reporting 
Requirement for Changes in Status for Public Utilities With Market-
Based Rate Authority, Order No. 652, 110 FERC ] 61,097 (2005).
    Casco Bay states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
parties on the official service list in the above-captioned proceeding.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005.

11. Pinnacle West Capital Corporation; Arizona Public Service Company; 
Pinnacle West Energy Corporation; APS Energy Services Company, Inc.

[Docket Nos. ER00-2268-011, EL05-10-003, ER99-4124-009, EL05-11-003, 
ER00-3312-010, EL05-12-003, ER99-4122-012, and EL05-13-003]

    Take notice that on April 11, 2005, Arizona Public Service Company 
(APS) and Electrical District Number Seven of Maricopa County, 
Roosevelt Irrigation District, Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage 
District, Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number 
One, Aguila Irrigation District, Harquahala Valley Power District, 
Electrical District Number Eight of

[[Page 22020]]

Maricopa County, McMullen Valley Water Conservation and Drainage 
District, Tonopah Irrigation District, and Electrical District Number 6 
of Pinal County (collectively the Majority Districts), submitted a 
Settlement Agreement in order to resolve issued raised by the Majority 
Districts concerning APS' market-based rates.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 2, 2005.

12. Otter Tail Power Company

[Docket No. ER00-3080-002]

    Take notice that on April 11, 2005, Otter Tail Power Company (Otter 
Tail) submitted its updated market analysis as required by the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission's orders in AEP Power Marketing, Inc. 107 
FERC ] 61,018, order on reh'g, 108 FERC ] 61,026 (2004).
    Otter Tail states that copies of the public version of this filing 
have been served on all parties to the proceeding captioned above, as 
well as the state commissions of Minnesota, North Dakota, and South 
Dakota.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 2, 2005.

13. Mill Run Windpower, LLC

[Docket Nos. ER01-1710-005 and ER05-660-001]

    Take notice that on April 15, 2005, Mill Run Windpower, LLC (Mill 
Run) filed a supplement to its February 28, 2005 filing in Docket Nos. 
ER01-1710-004 and ER05-660-000.
    Mill Run states that copies of the filing were served on parties on 
the official service lists for Docket Nos. ER01-1710 and ER05-660 and 
on the Florida Public Service Commission.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 22, 2005.

14. Somerset Windpower, LLC

[Docket Nos. ER01-2139-006 and ER05-661-001]

    Take notice that, on April 15, 2005, Somerset Windpower, LLC (Mill 
Run) filed a supplement to its February 28, 2005 filing in Docket Nos. 
ER01-2139-005 and ER05-661-000.
    Mill Run states that copies of the filing were served on parties on 
the official service list for Docket Nos. ER01-2139 and ER05-661 and on 
the Florida Public Service Commission.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 22, 2005.

15. Ontario Energy Trading International Corp.

[Docket No. ER02-1021-004]

    Take notice that on April 11, 2005, Ontario Energy Trading 
International Corp. (Ontario Energy) submitted a compliance filing 
pursuant to the Commission's new interim generation market power 
screens issued on April 14, 2004 in AEP Power Marketing Inc., et al., 
107 FERC ] 61,018 (2004), order on reh'g., 108 FERC ] 61,026 (2004).
    Ontario Energy states that copies of the filing were served on 
parties on the official service list in Docket No. ER02-1021-000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 2, 2005.

16. Entergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER03-811-003]

    Take notice that on April 12, 2005, Entergy Services, Inc., on 
behalf of Entergy Louisiana, Inc., tendered for filing with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, a compliance Interconnection and 
Operating Agreement with Occidental Chemical Corporation in response to 
the Commission's December 22, 2004, order in Entergy Services, Inc., 
109 FERC ] 61,342 (2004), reh'g denied, 110 FERC ] 61,365 (2005).
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005.

17. California Independent System Operator Corporation

[Docket No. ER05-416-004]

    Take notice that, on April 12, 2005, the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation (ISO) submitted an informational filing 
regarding to the ISO's updated transmission Access Charge rates 
effective as of January 1, 2005.
    The ISO states that this filing has been served upon the Public 
Utilities Commission of the State of California, the California Energy 
Commission, the California Electricity Oversight Board, the 
Participating Transmission Owners, and upon all parties with effective 
Scheduling Coordinator Service Agreements under the ISO Tariff. In 
addition, ISO states it is posting the filing on the ISO Home Page.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005.

18. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.

[Docket No. ER05-579-000]

    Take notice that on April 8, 2005 Midwest Independent Transmission 
System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted for filing a withdrawal 
of its February 15, 2005 filing of Amendment No. 1 to the Generation-
Transmission Interconnection Agreement among Wisconsin Electric Power 
Company, the Midwest ISO and American Transmission Company LLC for the 
Elm Road Generating Facility.
    Midwest ISO states that it has served the foregoing document upon 
each person designated on the official service list compiled by the 
Secretary in the above-captioned proceeding.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005.

19. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.

[Docket No. ER05-590-000]

    Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Midwest Independent Transmission 
System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted for filing a withdrawal 
of its February 16, 2005 filing of Amendment No. 1 to the Generation-
Transmission Interconnection Agreement among Wisconsin Electric Power 
Company, the Midwest ISO and American Transmission Company LLC for the 
Port Washington Generating Facility.
    Midwest ISO states that it has served the foregoing document upon 
each person designated on the official service list compiled by the 
Secretary in the above-captioned proceeding.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005.

20. Gexa Energy LLC

[Docket No. ER05-714-001]

    Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Gexa Energy LLC (Gexa), filed an 
amendment to its March 21, 2005 petition requesting Commission 
acceptance of Gexa's Rate Schedule FERC No. 1; the granting of certain 
blanket approvals, including the authority to sell electricity at 
market-based rates; and the waiver of certain Commission regulations.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m eastern time on April 29, 2005.

21. ISO New England Inc.

[Docket No. ER05-767-001]

    Take notice that on April 15, 2005, ISO New England Inc. (the ISO) 
submitted for filing a motion for expedited consideration and to revise 
the effective date requested in the Amendments to Appendix A of Market 
Rule 1 Regarding Reference Price Calculations, filed in this proceeding 
jointly by the ISO and the New England Power Pool Participants 
Committee on April 1, 2005.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 22, 2005.

22. California Independent System Operator Corporation

[Docket No. ER05-796-000]

    Take notice that on April 8, 2005, the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered for filing an amendment to 
the ISO Tariff

[[Page 22021]]

(Amendment No. 67) for acceptance by the Commission. The ISO states 
that the purpose of Amendment No. 67 is to revise the ISO Tariff 
provisions concerning the deadline for submitting supplemental energy 
bids to the CAISO, to provide for a deadline of 62 minutes prior to the 
operating hour rather than 60 minutes prior to the operating hour as 
currently stated in the ISO Tariff. The ISO requests an effective date 
of April 9, 2005.
    The ISO states that this filing has been served on the California 
Public Utilities Commission, the California Energy Commission, the 
California Electricity Oversight Board, all parties with effective 
Scheduling Coordinator Service Agreements under the ISO Tariff, and all 
parties in Docket No. EL04-132. In addition, the ISO states that it has 
posted the filing on its Web site.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005.

23. Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.

[Docket No. ER05-797-000]

    Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Orange and Rockland Utilities, 
Inc. (O&R) tendered for filing an amendment to its open access 
transmission tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 3. O&R 
states that the filing proposes a surcharge mechanism applicable to 
costs associated with the undergrounding of existing transmission 
facilities at the request or requirement of municipal governmental 
authorities. O&R requests an effective date of May 1, 2005.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005.

24. Virtual Energy, Inc.

[Docket No. ER05-798-000]

    Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Virtual Energy, Inc. (Virtual 
Energy) petitioned the Commission for acceptance of Virtual Energy, 
Inc. Rate Schedule FERC No. 1, under which Virtual Energy will engage 
in wholesale electric power and energy transactions as a marketer; the 
granting of certain blanket approvals, including the authority to sell 
electricity at market based rates; and the waiver of certain Commission 
regulations.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005.

25. Southwest Power Pool, Inc.

[Docket No. ER05-799-000]

    Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP) 
submitted for filing a partially executed service agreement for network 
integration transmission service (service agreement) between SPP and 
Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority (OMPA), as well as an executed 
Network Operating Agreement (NOA) between SPP, OMPA and Oklahoma Gas 
and Electric Company (OKGE). SPP requests an effective date of April 1, 
2005.
    SPP states that both OMPA and OKGE were served with a copy of this 
filing.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005.

26. Mirabito Gas & Electric, Inc.

[Docket No. ER05-800-000]

    Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Mirabito Gas & Electric, Inc. 
(Marabito) filed a Notice of Cancellation of its market-based rate 
authority in Docket No. ER00-3717-000, effective December 8, 2000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005.

27. Naniwa Energy LLC

[Docket No. ER05-801-000]

    Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Naniwa Energy LLC (Naniwa) 
submitted Notices of Cancellation of Service Agreement Nos. 1 and 2 
under Naniwa's FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, effective 
July 20, 2004. Naniwa states that all consents have been obtained for 
such cancellation and that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
the customers under the service agreements.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005.

28. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.

[Docket No. ER05-802-000]

    Take notice that on April 8, 2005, the Midwest Independent 
Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted, pursuant to 
section 205 of the Federal Power Act, revisions to the Midwest ISO's 
open access transmission and energy markets tariff to address several 
issues related to financial transmission rights. The Midwest ISO 
requests and effective date of May 6, 2005.
    The Midwest ISO has requested waiver of the service requirements 
set forth in 18 CFR Sec.  385.2010. The Midwest ISO states that it has 
electronically served a copy of this filing, with attachments, upon all 
Tariff Customers under the EMT, Midwest ISO Members, Member 
representatives of Transmission Owners and Non-Transmission Owners, the 
Midwest ISO Advisory Committee participants, as well as all state 
commissions within the region. In addition, the Midwest ISO states that 
the filing has been electronically posted on the Midwest ISO's Web site 
at https://www.midwestiso.org under the heading ``Filings to FERC'' for 
other interested parties in this matter. The Midwest ISO further states 
that it will provide hard copies to any interested parties upon 
request.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005.

29. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.

[Docket No. ER05-803-000]

    Take notice that, on April 8, 2005, the Midwest Independent 
Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted proposed 
revisions to Attachment H-1 (Index of Interconnection Agreement 
Customers) of its energy markets tariff to reflect the addition of an 
interconnection agreement to be executed between Indiana & Michigan, 
Northern Indiana Public Service Company, PJM Interconnection, Inc. and 
the Midwest ISO as Service Agreement No. 1524 in compliance with the 
Commission's March 9, 2005 Order Conditionally Accepting Filing and 
Instituting section 206 Proceeding, 110 FERC ] 61,276 (2005).
    The Midwest ISO states that copies of the filing were served on 
parties on the official service list in Docket Nos. ER05-31-000 and 
EL05-70-000. In addition, the Midwest ISO states that it has served a 
copy of this filing electronically, including attachments, upon all 
Tariff Customers under the EMT, Midwest ISO Members, Member 
representatives of Transmission Owners and Non-Transmission Owners, the 
Midwest ISO Advisory Committee participants, as well as all state 
commissions within the region. The Midwest ISO further states that the 
filing has also been posted electronically on the Midwest ISO's Web 
site at https://www.midwestiso.org under the heading ``Filings to FERC'' 
for other interested parties in this matter.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005.

30. Southern California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER05-804-000]

    Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Southern California Edison 
Company (SCE) submitted for filing an Interconnection Facilities 
Agreement (Interconnection Agreement), Service Agreement No. 137 under 
SCE's Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT), FERC Electric 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 5, and an associated Service Agreement 
for Wholesale Distribution Service (WDAT Service Agreement), Service 
Agreement

[[Page 22022]]

No. 138 under the WDAT, between SCE and the City of Moreno Valley 
(Moreno Valley). SCE states that the purpose of the Interconnection 
Agreement and the WDAT Service Agreement is to specify the terms and 
conditions under which SCE will provide Wholesale Distribution Service 
from the California Independent System Operator Controlled Grid at 
SCE's Valley Substation to a new Moreno Valley 12 kV interconnection at 
Moreno Valley owned property located on the southwest corner of 
Cottonwood Avenue and Redlands Boulevard in Riverside County, 
California.
    SCE states that copies of the filing were served upon the Public 
Utilities Commission of the State of California and Moreno Valley.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005.

31. Westar Energy, Inc.

[Docket No. ER05-805-000]

    Take notice that on April 8, 2005, Westar Energy, Inc. (Westar) 
submitted for filing a Notice of Cancellation for Rate Schedule FERC 
No. 230, an Electric Power Supply Agreement between Westar and the City 
of Enterprise, Kansas.
    Westar states that copies of the filing were served upon the Kansas 
Corporation Commission and the City of Enterprise, Kansas.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 29, 2005.

32. Westar Energy, Inc.

[Docket No. ER05-806-000]

    Take notice that on April 11, 2005, Kansas Gas and Electric Company 
and Westar Energy, Inc. (collectively Westar Energy) submitted for 
filing a Notice of Cancellation for Rate Schedules FERC Nos. 193, 195, 
196, 197 and 198, Generating Municipal Electric Service Agreements 
between Westar Energy and the City of Burlington, Kansas; City of 
Mulvane, Kansas; City of Neodesha, Kansas; City of Wellington, Kansas 
and the City of Winfield, Kansas.
    Westar Energy states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
City of Burlington, Kansas; City of Mulvane, Kansas, City of Neodesha, 
Kansas, City of Wellington, Kansas; City of Winfield, Kansas and the 
Kansas Corporation Commission.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 2, 2005.

33. Pacific Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ER05-807-000]

    Take notice that on April 11, 2005, Pacific Gas and Electric 
Company (PG&E) tendered for filing a Generator Special Facilities 
Agreement (GSFA), and Generator Interconnection Agreement (GIA) between 
PG&E and Diablo Winds, LLC (Diablo Winds) (collectively, Parties). PG&E 
states that the GSFA permits PG&E to recover the ongoing costs 
associated with owning, operating and maintaining the Special 
Facilities for the Parties. PG&E states that the GIA provides terms and 
conditions for billing, operation, maintenance and metering. PG&E 
further states that as detailed in the GSFA, PG&E proposes to charge 
Diablo Winds a monthly Cost-of-Ownership Charge equal to the rate for 
transmission-level, customer-financed facilities.
    PG&E states that copies of this filing have been served upon Diablo 
Winds, California Independent System Operator Corporation and the 
California Public Utilities Commission.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 2, 2005.

34. Eagle Point Cogeneration Partnership

[Docket No. ER05-808-000]

    Take notice that on April 11, 2005, pursuant to section 35.15, 18 
CFR 35.15 (2004), of the Commission's Regulations, Eagle Point 
Cogeneration Partnership (Eagle Point) filed with the Commission a 
Notice of Cancellation of market-based rate authority under the 
applicant's FERC Electric Tariff, Revised Volume No. 1. Eagle Point 
requests an effective date of April 11, 2005.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 2, 2005.

35. Midwest Independent Transmission

[Docket No. ER05-809-000]

    Take notice that on April 12, 2005 the Midwest Independent 
Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted, pursuant to 
section 205 of the Federal Power Act, revisions to section 7 (Billing 
and Payments; Defaults and Remedies) and Attachment L (Credit Policy) 
of the Midwest ISO's Open Access Transmission and Energy Markets 
Tariff. The Midwest ISO has requested June 11, 2005 as the effective 
date for the tariff sheets submitted as part of this filing.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005.

36. UGI Energy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER05-810-000]

    Take notice that on April 12, 2005, UGI Energy Services, Inc. filed 
a wholesale power sales tariff to sell capacity, energy, and certain 
ancillary services at market-based rates.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005.

37. New England Power Pool; ISO New England Inc.

[Docket Nos. ER05-811-000 and PL05-3-000]

    Take notice that on April 12, 2005, ISO New England Inc. (the ISO) 
and the New England Power Pool (NEPOOL) Participants Committee jointly 
filed for acceptance amendments (the Amendments) to the ISO Financial 
Assurance Policy for Market Participants, the ISO Financial Assurance 
Policy for Non-Market Participant Transmission Customers, and the ISO 
Financial Assurance Policy for Non-Market Participant FTR Customers and 
Non-Market Participant Demand Response Providers, which are, 
respectively, Exhibits 1A, 1B & 1C to Section I of the ISO 
Transmission, Markets and Services Tariff. A June 1, 2005 effective 
date for the filed changes is requested. The ISO states that they also 
filed the Amendments as an update to its prior compliance filing in 
Docket No. PL05-3-000.
    NEPOOL and the ISO state that copies of these materials were sent 
to the New England state governors and regulatory commissions and all 
customers under the ISO Transmission, Markets and Services Tariff.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005.

38. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

[Docket No. ER05-812-000]

    Take notice that on April 12, 2005, Consolidated Edison Company of 
New York, Inc. (Con Edison) tendered for filing amendments to Con 
Edison's Delivery Rate Schedule No. 96 (PASNY Tariff) and Economic 
Development Delivery Service Rate Schedule No. 92 (EDDS Tariff). Con 
Edison states that the filing proposes to revise the rates, terms, and 
conditions for delivery services that Con Edison provides under 
contracts with the New York Power Authority, the County of Westchester 
Public Utility Service Agency, and the New York City Public Utility 
Service. Con Edison requests that the proposed amendments be made 
effective on April 1, 2005.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 3, 2005.

Standard Paragraph

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to

[[Page 22023]]

the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice 
of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all parties to this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at https://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-2035 Filed 4-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.