Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Study, Mark Twain National Forest, Madison, WA, and Wayne Counties, MO, 21994-21995 [05-8482]

Download as PDF 21994 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 81 / Thursday, April 28, 2005 / Notices gas leasing found at 36 CFR 228, Subpart E—Oil and Gas Resources. Subsequently, the Regional Forester will authorize the Bureau of Land Management to offer specific National Forest System lands for lease. Possible Alternatives Seven alternative leasing scenarios were analyzed and compared in the draft EIS. These alternatives are: Alternative 1—No Action, No New Leasing; Alternative 2—Emphasize Oil & Gas Development; Alternative 3—Meet Forest Plan Direction; Alternative 4—Emphasize Surface Resources; Alternative 4a—Alternative 4 With Roadless Conservation Area Emphasis; Alternative 5—Combination of Alternatives 3 and 4; Alternative 5a—Alternative 5 With Roadless Conservation Area Emphasis. Alternative 5 and 5a were identified as ‘‘Preferred Alternatives’’ in the draft EIS. One or the other would be selected depending upon the outcome of the Roadless Rule. Responsible Official Gloria Brown, Forest Supervisor, Los Padres National Forest, Goleta, California, is the responsible official. Nature of Decision To Be Made In order to implement the proposed action the Forest Supervisor will amend the Los Padres Land and Resources Management Plan to incorporate the following leasing decisions: 1. Decide within Los Padres National Forest which, if any, National Forest System lands not already withdrawn from mineral entry, are available for oil and gas leasing and under what conditions (lease stipulations). (Reference: 36 CFR 228.102(d)). 2. Decide what specific National Forest System lands the Bureau of Land Management will be authorized to offer for lease, subject to Forest Service stipulations to be attached to leases issued by the Bureau of Land Management. (Reference: 36 CFR 228.102(e)). 3. If requested, recommend leasing options to the Bureau of Land Management for the non-federal lands with federal mineral ownership that are within the administrative boundary of Los Padres National Forest. Subsequently, the BLM will decide whether or not to offer leases on the specific lands authorized by the Forest Service. VerDate jul<14>2003 16:00 Apr 27, 2005 Jkt 205001 Dated: April 6, 2005. Gloria D. Brown, Forest Supervisor. [FR Doc. 05–8504 Filed 4–27–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Study, Mark Twain National Forest, Madison, WA, and Wayne Counties, MO Forest Service, USDA. Revised notice: intent to prepare an environmental impact statement AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) to analyze and disclose the environmental effects of proposed activities within the three OHV Study project areas. The three OHV Study project areas are located on National Forest System lands administered by the Potosi/Fredericktown and Poplar Bluff Ranger Districts is southeast Missouri. The legal descriptions of the three study areas are as follows: Palmer Study Area—This study area would be located on the Potosi Unit of the Potosi/Fredericktown Ranger District in Washington County, approximately 12 miles southwest of Potosi, Missouri. This trail system would be managed for a variety of motorized vehicles, including jeeps and dune buggies. Trailheads and parking areas would also be constructed at some locations. Cherokee Pass Study Area—This study area would be located on the Fredericktown Unit of the Potosi/ Fredericktown Ranger District in Madison County, approximately seven miles south of Fredericktown, Missouri. This trail system would be managed for ATV and equestrian use. Other motorized vehicles such as motorcycles, jeeps, and dune buggies, would not be allowed. Trailheads and parking areas would also be constructed at some locations. Blackwell Ridge Study Area—This study area would be located on the Poplar Bluff Ranger District in Wayne County, approximately 11⁄2 mile north of Williamsville, Missouri. This trail system would be managed for ATV and motorcycles. Other motorized fourwheel drive vehicles, jeeps, and dune buggies, would not be allowed. Trailheads and parking areas would also be constructed at some locations. The primary purpose of this project is to study OHV use and users to guide future management options on OHV PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 trail opportunities and use. This study will also evaluate equipment impacts to natural resources. Social impacts, such as customer satisfaction, demographics of trail users, and compatibility between trail users, would also be studied. The Mark Twain National Forest needs to determine if designating more motorized trails can be done in a manner that not only provides for this recreational use, but also addresses environmental concerns. It is hoped that by providing additional designated OHV trails, OHV users would avoid undesignated roads and trails and, thereby, the overall environmental damage from unauthorized use can be reduced. Observations by OHV managers locally and from other states indicate that when OHV riders have designated areas to ride, they are more likely to stay on designated routes. Therefore, the OHV customer, the resource manager, and the environment should all benefit from this study. Resource managers would be able to direct OHV customers to a designated trail system where impacts are confined, minimized, evaluated, monitored, and mitigated. With this study, OHV customers would know they are in an area where they can legally ride in a setting they enjoy. The Forest Service can promote responsible OHV use, better communicate with this forest user group, promote local partnerships for conservation education and OHV trail maintenance, and evaluate resource and social impacts. The focus of this study is to evaluate OHV use in three separate study locations and publish an evaluation of what is learned. The results of this study would be used to guide future management decisions on OHV trail management here and elsewhere in the National Forest System. At the end of the study period, unless the study is modified or terminated early, a separate decision, following the National Environmental Policy Act process, would be made as to whether or not to designate all, part, or none of the three areas as permanent OHV trails. The data collected from this study and other ongoing national studies would be used to corroborate and assist in making that decision. An original Notice of Intent was published in the Federal Register on May 6, 2004. Comments concerning the proposal should have been received during the original comment period. The Forest Service expects to file a Draft EIS with the Environmental Protection Agency and make it available for public comment by December 2005. DATES: E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 81 / Thursday, April 28, 2005 / Notices Comments concerning this revision should be received in writing within 30 days of this Notice’s publication. Send comments to: Potosi/ Fredericktown Ranger District, P.O. Box 188, Potosi, MO 63664. Electronic comments must be sent via the Internet to: comments-eastern-mark-twainpotosi@fs.fed.us. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom McGuire, Project Leader/Integrated Resource Analyst, Potosi/Fredericktown Ranger District, P.O. Box 188, Potosi Missouri 63664, phone (573) 438–5427. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Further information about the proposal can be found in the original notice of intent originally published in the Federal Register, Vol. 69, No. 88, pp.25365– 25367, on May 6, 2004. The scope of the project has not changed; therefore, this revised notice of intent does not initiate a new scoping period for this proposal. The notice of intent is being revised because the publication of the Draft EIS has been delayed for more than six months. The original release date was expected to be September 2004; the new expected release date is December 2005, and the Final EIS is expected to be released in March 2006. Estimated Dates for Filing The draft EIS is expected to be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency and available for public review in December 2005. A 45-day comment period will follow publication of a Notice of Availability of the draft EIS in the Federal Register. Comments received on the draft EIS will be analyzed and considered in preparation of a final EIS, expected in March 2006. A Record of Decision (ROD) will also be issued at that time along with the publication of a Notice of Availability of the final EIS and ROD in the Federal Register. Reviewers Obligation To Comment The Forest Service believes it is important at this early stage to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of the draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental review of the proposal in such a way that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer’s position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 513 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage but that are not raised until after completion of the final EIS may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, VerDate jul<14>2003 16:00 Apr 27, 2005 Jkt 205001 1022 (9th Cir, 1986), and Wisconsin Heritages Inc. v. Harris, 490 F.Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis., 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this proposed action participate by the close of the 45day comment period of the draft EIS in order that substantive comments and objections are available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final EIS. To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action, comments should be as specific as possible. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points. Responsible Official The responsible official for this environmental impact statement is Ronnie Raum, Forest Supervisor, Mark Twain National Forest, 401 Fairgrounds Rd, Rolla, MO 65401 (573) 364–4621. Dated: April 19, 2005. Michael J. Weber, District Ranger, Potosi/Fredericktown Ranger District, P.O. Box 188, Potosi, Missouri 63664. [FR Doc. 05–8482 Filed 4–27–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Notice of Resource Advisory Committee Meeting Lassen Resource Advisory Committee, Susanville, California, USDA Forest Service. ACTION: Notice of meetings. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committees Act (Pub. L. 92–463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106– 393) the Lassen National Forest’s Lassen County Resource Advisory Committee will meet Thursday, May 12, 2005, at the Lassen National Forest Supervisor’s Office, 2550 Riverside Drive, Susanville, California for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The business meeting on May 12th will begin at 9 a.m., at the Lassen National Forest Supervisor’s Office. There will be an update on the Coordinated Resource Management Plan (CRMP), as well as HR2389 and the project-monitoring letter. Time will also be set aside for PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 21995 public comments at the beginning of the meeting. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Andrews, District Ranger, Designated Federal Officer, at (530) 257–4188; or Public Affairs Officer Heidi Perry at (530) 252–6604. Laurie Tippin, Forest Supervisor. [FR Doc. 05–8502 Filed 4–27–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Rogue/Umpqua Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) AGENCY: ACTION: Forest Service, USDA. Action of meeting. SUMMARY: The Rogue/Umpqua Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet on Thursday and Friday, May 19 and 20, 2005. The purpose of the meeting is monitor RAC projects through fieldtrips. The fieldtrip is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. and conclude at approximately 4 p.m. on May 19 and begin at 9 a.m. and conclude at approximately 4 p.m. on May 20. The May 19 fiedltrip will be held on the Cottage Grove Ranger District, 78405 Cedar Park Road, Cottage Grove, OR. On May 20, the fieldtrip will be held on the Tiller Ranger District, 27812 Tiller Trail Highway, Tiller, OR. The agenda on both days includes a short business meeting from 9 to 9:30 a.m. to discuss RAC projects and funding, followed by monitoring RAC projects on the district. Public comments are welcome between 9 to 9:30 a.m. Written public comments may be submitted prior to the May fieldtrip by sending them to Designated Federal Official Jim Caplan at the address given below. For more information regarding this meeting, contact Designated Federal Official Jim Caplan; Umpqua National Forest; 2900 NW., Stewart Parkway, Roseburg, Oregon 97470; (541) 580– 0839. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dated: April 20, 2005. James A. Caplan, Forest Supervisor, Umpqua National Forest. [FR Doc. 05–8505 Filed 4–27–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–M E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 81 (Thursday, April 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21994-21995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-8482]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Study, Mark Twain National Forest, 
Madison, WA, and Wayne Counties, MO

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Revised notice: intent to prepare an environmental impact 
statement

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact 
statement (EIS) to analyze and disclose the environmental effects of 
proposed activities within the three OHV Study project areas. The three 
OHV Study project areas are located on National Forest System lands 
administered by the Potosi/Fredericktown and Poplar Bluff Ranger 
Districts is southeast Missouri. The legal descriptions of the three 
study areas are as follows:
    Palmer Study Area--This study area would be located on the Potosi 
Unit of the Potosi/Fredericktown Ranger District in Washington County, 
approximately 12 miles southwest of Potosi, Missouri. This trail system 
would be managed for a variety of motorized vehicles, including jeeps 
and dune buggies. Trailheads and parking areas would also be 
constructed at some locations.
    Cherokee Pass Study Area--This study area would be located on the 
Fredericktown Unit of the Potosi/Fredericktown Ranger District in 
Madison County, approximately seven miles south of Fredericktown, 
Missouri. This trail system would be managed for ATV and equestrian 
use. Other motorized vehicles such as motorcycles, jeeps, and dune 
buggies, would not be allowed. Trailheads and parking areas would also 
be constructed at some locations.
    Blackwell Ridge Study Area--This study area would be located on the 
Poplar Bluff Ranger District in Wayne County, approximately 1\1/2\ mile 
north of Williamsville, Missouri. This trail system would be managed 
for ATV and motorcycles. Other motorized four-wheel drive vehicles, 
jeeps, and dune buggies, would not be allowed. Trailheads and parking 
areas would also be constructed at some locations.
    The primary purpose of this project is to study OHV use and users 
to guide future management options on OHV trail opportunities and use. 
This study will also evaluate equipment impacts to natural resources. 
Social impacts, such as customer satisfaction, demographics of trail 
users, and compatibility between trail users, would also be studied.
    The Mark Twain National Forest needs to determine if designating 
more motorized trails can be done in a manner that not only provides 
for this recreational use, but also addresses environmental concerns. 
It is hoped that by providing additional designated OHV trails, OHV 
users would avoid undesignated roads and trails and, thereby, the 
overall environmental damage from unauthorized use can be reduced. 
Observations by OHV managers locally and from other states indicate 
that when OHV riders have designated areas to ride, they are more 
likely to stay on designated routes.
    Therefore, the OHV customer, the resource manager, and the 
environment should all benefit from this study. Resource managers would 
be able to direct OHV customers to a designated trail system where 
impacts are confined, minimized, evaluated, monitored, and mitigated. 
With this study, OHV customers would know they are in an area where 
they can legally ride in a setting they enjoy. The Forest Service can 
promote responsible OHV use, better communicate with this forest user 
group, promote local partnerships for conservation education and OHV 
trail maintenance, and evaluate resource and social impacts.
    The focus of this study is to evaluate OHV use in three separate 
study locations and publish an evaluation of what is learned. The 
results of this study would be used to guide future management 
decisions on OHV trail management here and elsewhere in the National 
Forest System. At the end of the study period, unless the study is 
modified or terminated early, a separate decision, following the 
National Environmental Policy Act process, would be made as to whether 
or not to designate all, part, or none of the three areas as permanent 
OHV trails. The data collected from this study and other ongoing 
national studies would be used to corroborate and assist in making that 
decision.

DATES: An original Notice of Intent was published in the Federal 
Register on May 6, 2004. Comments concerning the proposal should have 
been received during the original comment period. The Forest Service 
expects to file a Draft EIS with the Environmental Protection Agency 
and make it available for public comment by December 2005.

[[Page 21995]]


ADDRESSES: Comments concerning this revision should be received in 
writing within 30 days of this Notice's publication. Send comments to: 
Potosi/Fredericktown Ranger District, P.O. Box 188, Potosi, MO 63664. 
Electronic comments must be sent via the Internet to: comments-eastern-
mark-twain-potosi@fs.fed.us.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom McGuire, Project Leader/Integrated 
Resource Analyst, Potosi/Fredericktown Ranger District, P.O. Box 188, 
Potosi Missouri 63664, phone (573) 438-5427.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Further information about the proposal can 
be found in the original notice of intent originally published in the 
Federal Register, Vol. 69, No. 88, pp.25365-25367, on May 6, 2004. The 
scope of the project has not changed; therefore, this revised notice of 
intent does not initiate a new scoping period for this proposal. The 
notice of intent is being revised because the publication of the Draft 
EIS has been delayed for more than six months. The original release 
date was expected to be September 2004; the new expected release date 
is December 2005, and the Final EIS is expected to be released in March 
2006.

Estimated Dates for Filing

    The draft EIS is expected to be filed with the Environmental 
Protection Agency and available for public review in December 2005. A 
45-day comment period will follow publication of a Notice of 
Availability of the draft EIS in the Federal Register. Comments 
received on the draft EIS will be analyzed and considered in 
preparation of a final EIS, expected in March 2006. A Record of 
Decision (ROD) will also be issued at that time along with the 
publication of a Notice of Availability of the final EIS and ROD in the 
Federal Register.

Reviewers Obligation To Comment

    The Forest Service believes it is important at this early stage to 
give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public 
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of 
the draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental 
review of the proposal in such a way that it is meaningful and alerts 
an agency to the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont Yankee 
Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 513 (1978). Also, 
environmental objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage 
but that are not raised until after completion of the final EIS may be 
waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 
1016, 1022 (9th Cir, 1986), and Wisconsin Heritages Inc. v. Harris, 490 
F.Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis., 1980). Because of these court rulings, 
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action 
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period of the draft EIS 
in order that substantive comments and objections are available to the 
Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and 
respond to them in the final EIS. To assist the Forest Service in 
identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action, 
comments should be as specific as possible. Reviewers may wish to refer 
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing 
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.

Responsible Official

    The responsible official for this environmental impact statement is 
Ronnie Raum, Forest Supervisor, Mark Twain National Forest, 401 
Fairgrounds Rd, Rolla, MO 65401 (573) 364-4621.

    Dated: April 19, 2005.
Michael J. Weber,
District Ranger, Potosi/Fredericktown Ranger District, P.O. Box 188, 
Potosi, Missouri 63664.
[FR Doc. 05-8482 Filed 4-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.