Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Study, Mark Twain National Forest, Madison, WA, and Wayne Counties, MO, 21994-21995 [05-8482]
Download as PDF
21994
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 81 / Thursday, April 28, 2005 / Notices
gas leasing found at 36 CFR 228,
Subpart E—Oil and Gas Resources.
Subsequently, the Regional Forester will
authorize the Bureau of Land
Management to offer specific National
Forest System lands for lease.
Possible Alternatives
Seven alternative leasing scenarios
were analyzed and compared in the
draft EIS. These alternatives are:
Alternative 1—No Action, No New
Leasing;
Alternative 2—Emphasize Oil & Gas
Development;
Alternative 3—Meet Forest Plan
Direction;
Alternative 4—Emphasize Surface
Resources;
Alternative 4a—Alternative 4 With
Roadless Conservation Area
Emphasis;
Alternative 5—Combination of
Alternatives 3 and 4;
Alternative 5a—Alternative 5 With
Roadless Conservation Area
Emphasis.
Alternative 5 and 5a were identified
as ‘‘Preferred Alternatives’’ in the draft
EIS. One or the other would be selected
depending upon the outcome of the
Roadless Rule.
Responsible Official
Gloria Brown, Forest Supervisor, Los
Padres National Forest, Goleta,
California, is the responsible official.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
In order to implement the proposed
action the Forest Supervisor will amend
the Los Padres Land and Resources
Management Plan to incorporate the
following leasing decisions:
1. Decide within Los Padres National
Forest which, if any, National Forest
System lands not already withdrawn
from mineral entry, are available for oil
and gas leasing and under what
conditions (lease stipulations).
(Reference: 36 CFR 228.102(d)).
2. Decide what specific National
Forest System lands the Bureau of Land
Management will be authorized to offer
for lease, subject to Forest Service
stipulations to be attached to leases
issued by the Bureau of Land
Management. (Reference: 36 CFR
228.102(e)).
3. If requested, recommend leasing
options to the Bureau of Land
Management for the non-federal lands
with federal mineral ownership that are
within the administrative boundary of
Los Padres National Forest.
Subsequently, the BLM will decide
whether or not to offer leases on the
specific lands authorized by the Forest
Service.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:00 Apr 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
Dated: April 6, 2005.
Gloria D. Brown,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05–8504 Filed 4–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Study,
Mark Twain National Forest, Madison,
WA, and Wayne Counties, MO
Forest Service, USDA.
Revised notice: intent to prepare
an environmental impact statement
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will
prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to analyze and disclose
the environmental effects of proposed
activities within the three OHV Study
project areas. The three OHV Study
project areas are located on National
Forest System lands administered by the
Potosi/Fredericktown and Poplar Bluff
Ranger Districts is southeast Missouri.
The legal descriptions of the three study
areas are as follows:
Palmer Study Area—This study area
would be located on the Potosi Unit of
the Potosi/Fredericktown Ranger
District in Washington County,
approximately 12 miles southwest of
Potosi, Missouri. This trail system
would be managed for a variety of
motorized vehicles, including jeeps and
dune buggies. Trailheads and parking
areas would also be constructed at some
locations.
Cherokee Pass Study Area—This
study area would be located on the
Fredericktown Unit of the Potosi/
Fredericktown Ranger District in
Madison County, approximately seven
miles south of Fredericktown, Missouri.
This trail system would be managed for
ATV and equestrian use. Other
motorized vehicles such as motorcycles,
jeeps, and dune buggies, would not be
allowed. Trailheads and parking areas
would also be constructed at some
locations.
Blackwell Ridge Study Area—This
study area would be located on the
Poplar Bluff Ranger District in Wayne
County, approximately 11⁄2 mile north
of Williamsville, Missouri. This trail
system would be managed for ATV and
motorcycles. Other motorized fourwheel drive vehicles, jeeps, and dune
buggies, would not be allowed.
Trailheads and parking areas would also
be constructed at some locations.
The primary purpose of this project is
to study OHV use and users to guide
future management options on OHV
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
trail opportunities and use. This study
will also evaluate equipment impacts to
natural resources. Social impacts, such
as customer satisfaction, demographics
of trail users, and compatibility between
trail users, would also be studied.
The Mark Twain National Forest
needs to determine if designating more
motorized trails can be done in a
manner that not only provides for this
recreational use, but also addresses
environmental concerns. It is hoped that
by providing additional designated OHV
trails, OHV users would avoid
undesignated roads and trails and,
thereby, the overall environmental
damage from unauthorized use can be
reduced. Observations by OHV
managers locally and from other states
indicate that when OHV riders have
designated areas to ride, they are more
likely to stay on designated routes.
Therefore, the OHV customer, the
resource manager, and the environment
should all benefit from this study.
Resource managers would be able to
direct OHV customers to a designated
trail system where impacts are confined,
minimized, evaluated, monitored, and
mitigated. With this study, OHV
customers would know they are in an
area where they can legally ride in a
setting they enjoy. The Forest Service
can promote responsible OHV use,
better communicate with this forest user
group, promote local partnerships for
conservation education and OHV trail
maintenance, and evaluate resource and
social impacts.
The focus of this study is to evaluate
OHV use in three separate study
locations and publish an evaluation of
what is learned. The results of this
study would be used to guide future
management decisions on OHV trail
management here and elsewhere in the
National Forest System. At the end of
the study period, unless the study is
modified or terminated early, a separate
decision, following the National
Environmental Policy Act process,
would be made as to whether or not to
designate all, part, or none of the three
areas as permanent OHV trails. The data
collected from this study and other
ongoing national studies would be used
to corroborate and assist in making that
decision.
An original Notice of Intent was
published in the Federal Register on
May 6, 2004. Comments concerning the
proposal should have been received
during the original comment period.
The Forest Service expects to file a Draft
EIS with the Environmental Protection
Agency and make it available for public
comment by December 2005.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
28APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 81 / Thursday, April 28, 2005 / Notices
Comments concerning this
revision should be received in writing
within 30 days of this Notice’s
publication. Send comments to: Potosi/
Fredericktown Ranger District, P.O. Box
188, Potosi, MO 63664. Electronic
comments must be sent via the Internet
to: comments-eastern-mark-twainpotosi@fs.fed.us.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tom
McGuire, Project Leader/Integrated
Resource Analyst, Potosi/Fredericktown
Ranger District, P.O. Box 188, Potosi
Missouri 63664, phone (573) 438–5427.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Further
information about the proposal can be
found in the original notice of intent
originally published in the Federal
Register, Vol. 69, No. 88, pp.25365–
25367, on May 6, 2004. The scope of the
project has not changed; therefore, this
revised notice of intent does not initiate
a new scoping period for this proposal.
The notice of intent is being revised
because the publication of the Draft EIS
has been delayed for more than six
months. The original release date was
expected to be September 2004; the new
expected release date is December 2005,
and the Final EIS is expected to be
released in March 2006.
Estimated Dates for Filing
The draft EIS is expected to be filed
with the Environmental Protection
Agency and available for public review
in December 2005. A 45-day comment
period will follow publication of a
Notice of Availability of the draft EIS in
the Federal Register. Comments
received on the draft EIS will be
analyzed and considered in preparation
of a final EIS, expected in March 2006.
A Record of Decision (ROD) will also be
issued at that time along with the
publication of a Notice of Availability of
the final EIS and ROD in the Federal
Register.
Reviewers Obligation To Comment
The Forest Service believes it is
important at this early stage to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of the draft EIS must structure
their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal in such a way
that it is meaningful and alerts an
agency to the reviewer’s position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 513
(1978). Also, environmental objections
that could be raised at the draft EIS
stage but that are not raised until after
completion of the final EIS may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:00 Apr 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
1022 (9th Cir, 1986), and Wisconsin
Heritages Inc. v. Harris, 490 F.Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis., 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45day comment period of the draft EIS in
order that substantive comments and
objections are available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can
meaningfully consider them and
respond to them in the final EIS. To
assist the Forest Service in identifying
and considering issues and concerns on
the proposed action, comments should
be as specific as possible. Reviewers
may wish to refer to the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
implementing the procedural provisions
of the National Environmental Policy
Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing
these points.
Responsible Official
The responsible official for this
environmental impact statement is
Ronnie Raum, Forest Supervisor, Mark
Twain National Forest, 401 Fairgrounds
Rd, Rolla, MO 65401 (573) 364–4621.
Dated: April 19, 2005.
Michael J. Weber,
District Ranger, Potosi/Fredericktown Ranger
District, P.O. Box 188, Potosi, Missouri 63664.
[FR Doc. 05–8482 Filed 4–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Notice of Resource Advisory
Committee Meeting
Lassen Resource Advisory
Committee, Susanville, California,
USDA Forest Service.
ACTION: Notice of meetings.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in
the Federal Advisory Committees Act
(Pub. L. 92–463) and under the Secure
Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–
393) the Lassen National Forest’s Lassen
County Resource Advisory Committee
will meet Thursday, May 12, 2005, at
the Lassen National Forest Supervisor’s
Office, 2550 Riverside Drive, Susanville,
California for a business meeting. The
meeting is open to the public.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
business meeting on May 12th will
begin at 9 a.m., at the Lassen National
Forest Supervisor’s Office. There will be
an update on the Coordinated Resource
Management Plan (CRMP), as well as
HR2389 and the project-monitoring
letter. Time will also be set aside for
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21995
public comments at the beginning of the
meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Andrews, District Ranger,
Designated Federal Officer, at (530)
257–4188; or Public Affairs Officer
Heidi Perry at (530) 252–6604.
Laurie Tippin,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05–8502 Filed 4–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rogue/Umpqua Resource Advisory
Committee (RAC)
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Forest Service, USDA.
Action of meeting.
SUMMARY: The Rogue/Umpqua Resource
Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet on
Thursday and Friday, May 19 and 20,
2005. The purpose of the meeting is
monitor RAC projects through fieldtrips.
The fieldtrip is scheduled to begin at 9
a.m. and conclude at approximately 4
p.m. on May 19 and begin at 9 a.m. and
conclude at approximately 4 p.m. on
May 20. The May 19 fiedltrip will be
held on the Cottage Grove Ranger
District, 78405 Cedar Park Road, Cottage
Grove, OR. On May 20, the fieldtrip will
be held on the Tiller Ranger District,
27812 Tiller Trail Highway, Tiller, OR.
The agenda on both days includes a
short business meeting from 9 to 9:30
a.m. to discuss RAC projects and
funding, followed by monitoring RAC
projects on the district. Public
comments are welcome between 9 to
9:30 a.m. Written public comments may
be submitted prior to the May fieldtrip
by sending them to Designated Federal
Official Jim Caplan at the address given
below.
For
more information regarding this
meeting, contact Designated Federal
Official Jim Caplan; Umpqua National
Forest; 2900 NW., Stewart Parkway,
Roseburg, Oregon 97470; (541) 580–
0839.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: April 20, 2005.
James A. Caplan,
Forest Supervisor, Umpqua National Forest.
[FR Doc. 05–8505 Filed 4–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
28APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 81 (Thursday, April 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21994-21995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-8482]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Study, Mark Twain National Forest,
Madison, WA, and Wayne Counties, MO
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Revised notice: intent to prepare an environmental impact
statement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to analyze and disclose the environmental effects of
proposed activities within the three OHV Study project areas. The three
OHV Study project areas are located on National Forest System lands
administered by the Potosi/Fredericktown and Poplar Bluff Ranger
Districts is southeast Missouri. The legal descriptions of the three
study areas are as follows:
Palmer Study Area--This study area would be located on the Potosi
Unit of the Potosi/Fredericktown Ranger District in Washington County,
approximately 12 miles southwest of Potosi, Missouri. This trail system
would be managed for a variety of motorized vehicles, including jeeps
and dune buggies. Trailheads and parking areas would also be
constructed at some locations.
Cherokee Pass Study Area--This study area would be located on the
Fredericktown Unit of the Potosi/Fredericktown Ranger District in
Madison County, approximately seven miles south of Fredericktown,
Missouri. This trail system would be managed for ATV and equestrian
use. Other motorized vehicles such as motorcycles, jeeps, and dune
buggies, would not be allowed. Trailheads and parking areas would also
be constructed at some locations.
Blackwell Ridge Study Area--This study area would be located on the
Poplar Bluff Ranger District in Wayne County, approximately 1\1/2\ mile
north of Williamsville, Missouri. This trail system would be managed
for ATV and motorcycles. Other motorized four-wheel drive vehicles,
jeeps, and dune buggies, would not be allowed. Trailheads and parking
areas would also be constructed at some locations.
The primary purpose of this project is to study OHV use and users
to guide future management options on OHV trail opportunities and use.
This study will also evaluate equipment impacts to natural resources.
Social impacts, such as customer satisfaction, demographics of trail
users, and compatibility between trail users, would also be studied.
The Mark Twain National Forest needs to determine if designating
more motorized trails can be done in a manner that not only provides
for this recreational use, but also addresses environmental concerns.
It is hoped that by providing additional designated OHV trails, OHV
users would avoid undesignated roads and trails and, thereby, the
overall environmental damage from unauthorized use can be reduced.
Observations by OHV managers locally and from other states indicate
that when OHV riders have designated areas to ride, they are more
likely to stay on designated routes.
Therefore, the OHV customer, the resource manager, and the
environment should all benefit from this study. Resource managers would
be able to direct OHV customers to a designated trail system where
impacts are confined, minimized, evaluated, monitored, and mitigated.
With this study, OHV customers would know they are in an area where
they can legally ride in a setting they enjoy. The Forest Service can
promote responsible OHV use, better communicate with this forest user
group, promote local partnerships for conservation education and OHV
trail maintenance, and evaluate resource and social impacts.
The focus of this study is to evaluate OHV use in three separate
study locations and publish an evaluation of what is learned. The
results of this study would be used to guide future management
decisions on OHV trail management here and elsewhere in the National
Forest System. At the end of the study period, unless the study is
modified or terminated early, a separate decision, following the
National Environmental Policy Act process, would be made as to whether
or not to designate all, part, or none of the three areas as permanent
OHV trails. The data collected from this study and other ongoing
national studies would be used to corroborate and assist in making that
decision.
DATES: An original Notice of Intent was published in the Federal
Register on May 6, 2004. Comments concerning the proposal should have
been received during the original comment period. The Forest Service
expects to file a Draft EIS with the Environmental Protection Agency
and make it available for public comment by December 2005.
[[Page 21995]]
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning this revision should be received in
writing within 30 days of this Notice's publication. Send comments to:
Potosi/Fredericktown Ranger District, P.O. Box 188, Potosi, MO 63664.
Electronic comments must be sent via the Internet to: comments-eastern-
mark-twain-potosi@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom McGuire, Project Leader/Integrated
Resource Analyst, Potosi/Fredericktown Ranger District, P.O. Box 188,
Potosi Missouri 63664, phone (573) 438-5427.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Further information about the proposal can
be found in the original notice of intent originally published in the
Federal Register, Vol. 69, No. 88, pp.25365-25367, on May 6, 2004. The
scope of the project has not changed; therefore, this revised notice of
intent does not initiate a new scoping period for this proposal. The
notice of intent is being revised because the publication of the Draft
EIS has been delayed for more than six months. The original release
date was expected to be September 2004; the new expected release date
is December 2005, and the Final EIS is expected to be released in March
2006.
Estimated Dates for Filing
The draft EIS is expected to be filed with the Environmental
Protection Agency and available for public review in December 2005. A
45-day comment period will follow publication of a Notice of
Availability of the draft EIS in the Federal Register. Comments
received on the draft EIS will be analyzed and considered in
preparation of a final EIS, expected in March 2006. A Record of
Decision (ROD) will also be issued at that time along with the
publication of a Notice of Availability of the final EIS and ROD in the
Federal Register.
Reviewers Obligation To Comment
The Forest Service believes it is important at this early stage to
give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
the draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal in such a way that it is meaningful and alerts
an agency to the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont Yankee
Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 513 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage
but that are not raised until after completion of the final EIS may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir, 1986), and Wisconsin Heritages Inc. v. Harris, 490
F.Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis., 1980). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period of the draft EIS
in order that substantive comments and objections are available to the
Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and
respond to them in the final EIS. To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action,
comments should be as specific as possible. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Responsible Official
The responsible official for this environmental impact statement is
Ronnie Raum, Forest Supervisor, Mark Twain National Forest, 401
Fairgrounds Rd, Rolla, MO 65401 (573) 364-4621.
Dated: April 19, 2005.
Michael J. Weber,
District Ranger, Potosi/Fredericktown Ranger District, P.O. Box 188,
Potosi, Missouri 63664.
[FR Doc. 05-8482 Filed 4-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P