Smith Bagley, Inc., Petition for Waiver of Section 54.400(e) of the Commission's Rules, 21779-21781 [05-8339]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 27, 2005 / Notices
SUMMARY: This document grants
informal requests for waiver of the
deadline for compliance with the
Commission’s revised presubscribed
interexchange carrier (PIC) change
charge policies. PIC change charges are
federally-tariffed charges imposed by
incumbent local exchange carriers on
end-user subscribers when these
subscribers change their long distance
carriers. The order extends by six
months the date by which incumbent
local exchange carriers must file tariff
revisions to comply with the revised PIC
change charge requirements.
DATES: Effective Date: April 8, 2005.
Compliance Date: Incumbent local
exchange carriers shall filed revised
rates in compliance with the PIC Change
Charge Order no later than October 17,
2005. These rates shall be effective on
15 days’ notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer McKee, Wireline Competition
Bureau, Pricing Policy Division, (202)
418–1530, jennifer.mckee@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the order in CC Docket No.
02–53 released on April 11, 2005. The
full text of this document is available on
the Commission’s Electronic Comment
Filing System Web site and for public
inspection during regular business
hours in the FCC Reference Center,
Room CY–A257, 445 Twelfth Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20554.
On February 10, 2005, the
Commission adopted a report and order
revising its requirements regarding PIC
change charges. Presubscribed
Interexchange Carrier Charges, 70 FR
12601, March 15, 2005. PIC change
charges are federally tariffed charges
imposed by local exchange carriers
(LECs) on end user subscribers when
these subscribers change their
presubscribed interexchange carriers
(IXCs). Based on the record in the
proceeding, the Commission required
incumbent LECs to adopt separate PIC
change charges for changes that are
processed electronically and manually.
The Commission adopted a safe harbor
of $1.25 for electronically processed PIC
changes, and a safe harbor of $5.50 for
manually processed PIC changes. The
Commission also required that, when a
customer changes its PIC in conjunction
with changing its intraLATA primary
interexchange carrier (LPIC), incumbent
LECs should assess half of the
applicable federally-tariffed PIC change
charge. Incumbent LECs were required
to revise their Federal tariffs to reflect
these changes within 30 days of
publication of the order in the Federal
Register, with the new rates to be
effective on 15 days’ notice. The PIC
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:41 Apr 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
Change Charge Order was published in
the Federal Register on March 15, 2005;
therefore, incumbent LECs were
required to file their tariff revisions by
April 14, 2005.
Several individual incumbent LECs
and trade groups representing
incumbent LECs have informally
requested that the Commission extend
the effective date of the requirements in
the PIC Change Charge Order. These
entities assert that they will not be able
by April 14 to make the changes
necessary within their systems to assess
separate charges for manually and
electronically processed PIC changes, or
to assess the 50 percent charge when
PICs are changed in conjunction with
LPICs.
The incumbent LECs have shown
good cause for an extension of the tariff
revision deadline. Several incumbent
LECs have provided extensive
explanations of the changes to their
billing and operating systems necessary
for implementation of the revised PIC
change charges. We therefore find that
a limited waiver of the deadline for
complying with the PIC Change Charge
Order is warranted. We do not,
however, believe that the public interest
is served by delaying the
implementation of the PIC change
charge requirements for the ten- to
twelve-month period requested by some
parties. Instead, we extend by six
months the effective date for filing
revised tariffs implementing the PIC
change charge requirements. Based on
information provided by several
incumbent LECs, we believe that six
months is a sufficient amount of time
for incumbent LECs to make the system
changes necessary to implement the
revised PIC change charge requirements.
This limited extension serves the public
interest by allowing incumbent LECs to
implement revised PIC change charges
at one time, rather than in a piecemeal
fashion, which could create customer
confusion.
Accordingly, it is ordered, pursuant to
section 1–4, 201, 203, 205, and 403 of
the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151–154, 201, 203,
205, and 403, §§ 1.3 and 1.41 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.3 and
1.41, and authority delegated under
§§ 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission’s
rules, 47 CFR 0.91 and 0.291, that the
informal request of the incumbent LECs
for a limited waiver of the date for filing
tariff revisions related to the PIC Change
Charge Order is granted, to the extent
discussed above. Incumbent LECs shall
file revised rates, to include one rate for
PIC changes that are processed
electronically and a separate rate for PIC
changes that are processed manually,
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21779
and rates equal to 50 percent of the full
PIC change charge rate when a customer
requests a PIC change in conjunction
with an LPIC change, no later than
October 17, 2005. These rates shall be
effective on fifteen (15) days’ notice.
Federal Communications Commission.
Lisa S. Gelb,
Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau.
[FR Doc. 05–8342 Filed 4–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[WC Docket Number 03–109; FCC 05–77]
Smith Bagley, Inc., Petition for Waiver
of Section 54.400(e) of the
Commission’s Rules
Federal Communications
Commission.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission grants the petition of Smith
Bagley, Inc. (SBI) seeking a waiver of
section 54.400(e) of the Commission’s
Lifeline and Link-Up eligibility rules to
enable eligible residents of the Eastern
Navajo Agency in the state of New
Mexico to receive enhanced Lifeline and
Link-Up support.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Seifert, Assistant Chief, Wireline
Competition Bureau,
Telecommunications Access Policy
Division, (202) 418–7400, TTY (202)
418–0484.
This is a
summary of the Commission’s
Memorandum Opinion and Order in
WC Docket No. 03–109 released on
March 30, 2005. The full text of this
document is available for public
inspection during regular business
hours in the FCC Reference Center,
Room CY–A257, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
1. In this Order, we grant the petition
of Smith Bagley, Inc. (SBI) seeking a
waiver of § 54.400(e) of the
Commission’s Lifeline and Link-Up
eligibility rules to enable eligible
residents of the Eastern Navajo Agency
in the state of New Mexico to receive
enhanced Lifeline and Link-Up support.
We find that this waiver is in the public
interest and warranted by the unique
and compelling circumstances of lowincome consumers residing in the
Eastern Navajo Agency.
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
21780
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 27, 2005 / Notices
II. Discussion
2. We grant SBI’s request for waiver
of § 54.400(e) of the Commission’s rules
and find that SBI has demonstrated
good cause to justify the waiver by
demonstrating that special
circumstances exist and because
granting such a waiver, in this instance,
is in the public interest.
3. Generally, the Commission’s rules
may be waived for good cause shown.
The Commission may exercise its
discretion to waive a rule where the
particular facts make strict compliance
inconsistent with the public interest. In
addition, the Commission may take into
account considerations of hardship,
equity, or more effective
implementation of overall policy on an
individual basis. Waiver of the
Commission’s rules is therefore
appropriate only if special
circumstances warrant a deviation from
the general rule, and such deviation will
serve the public interest.
4. We find that SBI has identified
special circumstances in the Eastern
Navajo Agency that warrant a waiver of
§ 54.400(e) of the Commission’s rules. In
the Twelfth Report and Order, 65 FR
47941, August 4, 2000, the Commission
identified a number of factors that are
primary impediments to subscribership
on Tribal lands, including the lack of
access to and/or affordability of
telecommunications services, the cost of
basic service, the cost of intrastate toll
service, inadequate telecommunications
infrastructure and the cost of line
extensions, and the lack of competitive
service providers offering alternative
technologies. To address these
impediments, the Commission adopted
measures specifically targeted to
increase subscribership and
infrastructure development on Tribal
lands, where unaffordable service and
low subscribership are most prevalent.
Our review of the record reveals that the
Eastern Navajo Agency has the same
impediments to subscribership and
infrastructure development as those
existing on Tribal lands.
5. The Eastern Navajo Agency
encompasses lands that do not fall
within the Commission definition of a
‘‘reservation’’ for purposes of enhanced
Lifeline and Link-Up support. Ninetytwo percent of the 37,404 persons living
within its borders are Navajo Nation
tribal members. Recent data published
by the Census Bureau indicate that
telephone penetration rates and per
capita incomes in the Eastern Navajo
Agency are far below the average
existing throughout America. The
telephone subscribership penetration
rates for the United States are
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:41 Apr 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
approximately 94% and per capita
income is $21,587. Telephone
penetration rates and per capita income
in the Eastern Navajo Agency are far
below the average existing on Tribal
lands nationwide. Census data show
that the average telephone penetration
rate on Tribal lands is approximately
68% and per capita income is $12,452.
By comparison, telephone penetration
in the Eastern Navajo Agency is
approximately 33% and per capita
income is $6,979. Census data also show
that nearly 45% of the 37,404 Eastern
Navajo Agency residents subsist at or
below the federal poverty level,
compared to 23.5% of American Indian
residents living on Tribal lands. In
addition, data show that unemployment
in the Eastern Navajo Agency stands at
25%, compared to 13.6% of American
Indian residents on Tribal lands.
Finally, approximately 52% of
households rely on wood for heat and
46% of households lack plumbing. It is
evident, therefore, that depressed
economic conditions exist in the Eastern
Navajo Agency. The Commission has
previously determined that this is one of
the primary causes of low
subscribership levels.
6. Other factors identified by the
Commission as impediments to
subscribership also exist in the Eastern
Navajo Agency. In particular, the cost of
basic telephone service, $13.50 per
month, and the cost of intrastate toll
service, $0.16 per minute, is high
relative to the incomes of many families
in the Eastern Navajo Agency.
Moreover, sparse population and
distances between existing plant and
requesting customers in this area make
extending wireline telephone facilities
challenging, if not infeasible. In
addition, depressed economic
conditions of potential subscribers may
not justify construction of
telecommunications facilities because of
the consumers’ inability to pay for
service. In fact, there are many areas
within the Eastern Navajo Agency
where no telephone service is available.
SBI submits that it has been unable to
identify another area in the United
States of similar geographic size or
population that suffers from these types
of conditions.
7. Based on the statistics discussed
above and our review of the record, we
conclude that specific action is needed
to address the impediments to
subscribership and infrastructure
development in the Eastern Navajo
Agency to ensure affordable access to
telecommunications services for
residents. Although the enhanced
Lifeline and Link-Up program is limited
to low-income consumers living on
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reservations, most of the factors that the
Commission found relevant in
establishing enhanced Lifeline and
Link-Up support exist for the Eastern
Navajo Agency. We therefore conclude
that it is appropriate to waive
§ 54.400(e) of the Commission’s rules
and permit ETCs serving the Eastern
Navajo Agency to offer Tier 4 Lifeline
and Link-Up benefits to qualified
residents.
8. We find that granting SBI’s Waiver
Petition will serve the public interest by
allowing SBI to provide service at rates
that will likely increase the number of
subscribers in the Eastern Navajo
Agency who can afford basic telephone
service. As illustrated in SBI’s Waiver
Petition, household telephone
penetration in the other four Navajo
Nation Agencies significantly increased
as a result of ETCs having the ability to
offer and advertise Tier 4 benefits. In
fact, in three years, SBI added more than
27,000 new Tier 4-eligible subscribers in
four other Navajo Nation Agencies.
Based on the performance of the other
four Navajo Agencies, SBI estimates that
20,000 households in the Eastern Navajo
Agency will be able to initiate telephone
service with the availability of Tier 4
support. This record persuades us that
making enhanced Lifeline and Link-Up
support available will eliminate or
diminish the effect of unaffordability for
individuals in the Eastern Navajo
Agency who have never had telephone
service and for individuals who cannot
afford to maintain telephone service.
Furthermore, making access to
telecommunications services more
affordable also serves the public interest
because it enables these low-income
consumers to have easier access to
emergency, medical, government and
other public services that they may
need.
9. The availability of enhanced federal
support in the Eastern Navajo Agency
will also make this area more attractive
for carrier investment and deployment
of telecommunications infrastructure.
As the Commission stated in the Twelfth
Report and Order, increasing the total
number of individuals who are
connected to the network within a tribal
community enhances the value of the
network in that community and results
in greater incentives for ETCs to serve
those areas. Specifically, as the number
of potential subscribers grows, carriers
may achieve greater economies of scale
and scope when deploying facilities and
providing service to those areas. In this
way, granting this waiver serves the
public interest because doing so furthers
the Commission’s goal of increasing the
deployment of telecommunications
facilities in unserved and underserved
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 27, 2005 / Notices
regions of the Nation, especially among
Native American populations. We
emphasize that the action we take here
does not affect state sovereignty or
impinge upon a state’s ability to
establish universal service programs
aimed at increasing telephone
subscribership within its borders.
10. Verizon opposes a waiver of
§ 54.400(e) until such time as the
Commission determines how the term
‘‘near reservation’’ should be defined.
As noted above, however, Smith Bagley
no longer requests the Commission to
designate the Eastern Navajo Agency as
‘‘near reservation’’ land. Because we do
not grant this waiver on the basis of
defining ‘‘near reservation,’’ we reject
Verizon’s argument.
11. Further, we are not persuaded by
Verizon’s argument that SBI’s Waiver
Petition should be denied because states
are in a better position to address
pockets of low subscribership in nonreservation areas within their respective
state. We agree that, in most instances,
it is more appropriate for states to
implement Lifeline and Link-Up
programs designed for the specific
needs of their state. Nothing in this
order is intended to prevent state action
in this regard. Indeed, the state of New
Mexico is free to adopt measures to
eradicate pockets of low subscribership
within its borders. We emphasize that,
at the present time, 67% of occupied
housing units in the Eastern Navajo
Agency do not have telephone service.
As we stated in the Twelfth Report and
Order, ‘‘the unavailability or
unaffordability of telecommunications
service on Tribal lands is at odds with
our statutory goal of ensuring access to
such services to ‘‘[c]onsumers in all
regions of the Nation, including lowincome consumers.’’ Although the
Eastern Navajo Agency is not entirely
comprised of Tribal lands under the
Commission’s definition, the area is
almost exclusively populated by Native
Americans that suffer from the same
conditions present on other federallyrecognized Tribal lands. The availability
of Tier 4 support program will provide
immediate and vital benefits to lowincome consumers in the Eastern Navajo
Agency, consistent with the
Commission’s goal of enhancing
telecommunications access among
consumers on Tribal lands and its
responsibility to ensure a standard of
livability for members of Indian tribes.
III. Ordering Clause
12. Pursuant to authority contained in
sections 1, 4, and 254 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154, 254, and
the authority under § 1.3 of the
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:41 Apr 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.3, the
Waiver Petition filed by Smith Bagley,
Inc., on November 15, 2004, is granted.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–8339 Filed 4–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[WT Docket No. 05–62; FCC 05–31]
Suspension of the Acceptance of
Applications for new 900 MHz Licenses
Allotted to Business and Industrial
Land Transportation Pool Licensees
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission affirmed the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau’s (Bureau)
decision to suspend the acceptance of
applications for new 900 MHz business
and industrial land transportation (B/
ILT) licenses. The Commission takes
this action to facilitate the auction of
900 MHz B/ILT white space.
DATES: The application suspension
became effective on September 17, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Connelly, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, at (202)
418–0620.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Federal
Communications Commission’s
Memorandum Opinion and Order
(MO&O), FCC 05–31, in WT Docket No.
05–62, adopted February 10, 2005, and
released February 16, 2005. The full text
of this document is available for public
inspection during regular business
hours at the FCC Reference Information
Center, 445 12th St., SW., Room CY–
A257, Washington, DC 20554. The
complete text may be purchased from
the Commission’s duplicating
contractor: Best Copy & Printing, Inc.,
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 800–
378–3160, facsimile 202–488–5563, or
via e-mail at www.fcc@bcpiweb.com.
1. In this document, the Commission
affirms the Bureau’s decision to suspend
the acceptance of applications for new
900 MHz business and industrial land
transportation (B/ILT) licenses in a
Public Notice, 19 FCC Rcd 18,277
(2004), until further notice. The Bureau
noted that an exceptionally large
number of applications for 900 MHz
authorizations had been filed
subsequent to the release of the 800
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21781
MHz Rebanding Order, 69 FR 67823,
November 22, 2004. The Bureau noted
its concern that such additional filings
might compromise the ability to
accommodate displaced systems while
the 800 MHz band is in the process of
being reconfigured to abate
unacceptable interference to Public
Safety, Critical Infrastructure, and other
‘‘high site’’ 800 MHz systems. The
Bureau provided that applications for
the modification of existing facilities,
assignment of licenses, or transfer of
control of a licensee would continue to
be accepted, subject to applicable rules
regarding eligibility, loading, and other
requirements. In addition, applicants
were advised that pursuant to 47 CFR
1.925, they may have recourse via the
Commission’s waiver provisions to
request an exception to the freeze.
2. Because of the fundamental
changes the Commission is proposing in
the service areas and channel blocks for
future licensees in the 900 MHz B/ILT
white space spectrum, the Commission
finds it appropriate and necessary to
continue to suspend new 900 MHz
applications in the B/ILT category
Pools. Being cognizant of the needs of
existing licensees, and the fact that
incumbents may continue to file
modification applications, the
Commission will consider requests for
waiver of the application freeze for new
authorizations (e.g., a licensee with a
legitimate business need to expand
coverage or add channels), thereby
striking an appropriate balance of the
need to keep the spectrum as
unencumbered as possible with the
needs of current licensees with business
plans that need to be effectuated.
Further, the Commission stresses that
the waiver applicant bears the burden of
demonstrating compliance with waiver
standards, and notes that all 900 MHz
band applications for new licenses filed
prior to the freeze and are still pending,
and will be processed in the normal
course.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–8343 Filed 4–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21779-21781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-8339]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[WC Docket Number 03-109; FCC 05-77]
Smith Bagley, Inc., Petition for Waiver of Section 54.400(e) of
the Commission's Rules
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission grants the petition of Smith
Bagley, Inc. (SBI) seeking a waiver of section 54.400(e) of the
Commission's Lifeline and Link-Up eligibility rules to enable eligible
residents of the Eastern Navajo Agency in the state of New Mexico to
receive enhanced Lifeline and Link-Up support.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Seifert, Assistant Chief,
Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division,
(202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's
Memorandum Opinion and Order in WC Docket No. 03-109 released on March
30, 2005. The full text of this document is available for public
inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center,
Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
I. Introduction
1. In this Order, we grant the petition of Smith Bagley, Inc. (SBI)
seeking a waiver of Sec. 54.400(e) of the Commission's Lifeline and
Link-Up eligibility rules to enable eligible residents of the Eastern
Navajo Agency in the state of New Mexico to receive enhanced Lifeline
and Link-Up support. We find that this waiver is in the public interest
and warranted by the unique and compelling circumstances of low-income
consumers residing in the Eastern Navajo Agency.
[[Page 21780]]
II. Discussion
2. We grant SBI's request for waiver of Sec. 54.400(e) of the
Commission's rules and find that SBI has demonstrated good cause to
justify the waiver by demonstrating that special circumstances exist
and because granting such a waiver, in this instance, is in the public
interest.
3. Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause
shown. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where
the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the
public interest. In addition, the Commission may take into account
considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of
overall policy on an individual basis. Waiver of the Commission's rules
is therefore appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a
deviation from the general rule, and such deviation will serve the
public interest.
4. We find that SBI has identified special circumstances in the
Eastern Navajo Agency that warrant a waiver of Sec. 54.400(e) of the
Commission's rules. In the Twelfth Report and Order, 65 FR 47941,
August 4, 2000, the Commission identified a number of factors that are
primary impediments to subscribership on Tribal lands, including the
lack of access to and/or affordability of telecommunications services,
the cost of basic service, the cost of intrastate toll service,
inadequate telecommunications infrastructure and the cost of line
extensions, and the lack of competitive service providers offering
alternative technologies. To address these impediments, the Commission
adopted measures specifically targeted to increase subscribership and
infrastructure development on Tribal lands, where unaffordable service
and low subscribership are most prevalent. Our review of the record
reveals that the Eastern Navajo Agency has the same impediments to
subscribership and infrastructure development as those existing on
Tribal lands.
5. The Eastern Navajo Agency encompasses lands that do not fall
within the Commission definition of a ``reservation'' for purposes of
enhanced Lifeline and Link-Up support. Ninety-two percent of the 37,404
persons living within its borders are Navajo Nation tribal members.
Recent data published by the Census Bureau indicate that telephone
penetration rates and per capita incomes in the Eastern Navajo Agency
are far below the average existing throughout America. The telephone
subscribership penetration rates for the United States are
approximately 94% and per capita income is $21,587. Telephone
penetration rates and per capita income in the Eastern Navajo Agency
are far below the average existing on Tribal lands nationwide. Census
data show that the average telephone penetration rate on Tribal lands
is approximately 68% and per capita income is $12,452. By comparison,
telephone penetration in the Eastern Navajo Agency is approximately 33%
and per capita income is $6,979. Census data also show that nearly 45%
of the 37,404 Eastern Navajo Agency residents subsist at or below the
federal poverty level, compared to 23.5% of American Indian residents
living on Tribal lands. In addition, data show that unemployment in the
Eastern Navajo Agency stands at 25%, compared to 13.6% of American
Indian residents on Tribal lands. Finally, approximately 52% of
households rely on wood for heat and 46% of households lack plumbing.
It is evident, therefore, that depressed economic conditions exist in
the Eastern Navajo Agency. The Commission has previously determined
that this is one of the primary causes of low subscribership levels.
6. Other factors identified by the Commission as impediments to
subscribership also exist in the Eastern Navajo Agency. In particular,
the cost of basic telephone service, $13.50 per month, and the cost of
intrastate toll service, $0.16 per minute, is high relative to the
incomes of many families in the Eastern Navajo Agency. Moreover, sparse
population and distances between existing plant and requesting
customers in this area make extending wireline telephone facilities
challenging, if not infeasible. In addition, depressed economic
conditions of potential subscribers may not justify construction of
telecommunications facilities because of the consumers' inability to
pay for service. In fact, there are many areas within the Eastern
Navajo Agency where no telephone service is available. SBI submits that
it has been unable to identify another area in the United States of
similar geographic size or population that suffers from these types of
conditions.
7. Based on the statistics discussed above and our review of the
record, we conclude that specific action is needed to address the
impediments to subscribership and infrastructure development in the
Eastern Navajo Agency to ensure affordable access to telecommunications
services for residents. Although the enhanced Lifeline and Link-Up
program is limited to low-income consumers living on reservations, most
of the factors that the Commission found relevant in establishing
enhanced Lifeline and Link-Up support exist for the Eastern Navajo
Agency. We therefore conclude that it is appropriate to waive Sec.
54.400(e) of the Commission's rules and permit ETCs serving the Eastern
Navajo Agency to offer Tier 4 Lifeline and Link-Up benefits to
qualified residents.
8. We find that granting SBI's Waiver Petition will serve the
public interest by allowing SBI to provide service at rates that will
likely increase the number of subscribers in the Eastern Navajo Agency
who can afford basic telephone service. As illustrated in SBI's Waiver
Petition, household telephone penetration in the other four Navajo
Nation Agencies significantly increased as a result of ETCs having the
ability to offer and advertise Tier 4 benefits. In fact, in three
years, SBI added more than 27,000 new Tier 4-eligible subscribers in
four other Navajo Nation Agencies. Based on the performance of the
other four Navajo Agencies, SBI estimates that 20,000 households in the
Eastern Navajo Agency will be able to initiate telephone service with
the availability of Tier 4 support. This record persuades us that
making enhanced Lifeline and Link-Up support available will eliminate
or diminish the effect of unaffordability for individuals in the
Eastern Navajo Agency who have never had telephone service and for
individuals who cannot afford to maintain telephone service.
Furthermore, making access to telecommunications services more
affordable also serves the public interest because it enables these
low-income consumers to have easier access to emergency, medical,
government and other public services that they may need.
9. The availability of enhanced federal support in the Eastern
Navajo Agency will also make this area more attractive for carrier
investment and deployment of telecommunications infrastructure. As the
Commission stated in the Twelfth Report and Order, increasing the total
number of individuals who are connected to the network within a tribal
community enhances the value of the network in that community and
results in greater incentives for ETCs to serve those areas.
Specifically, as the number of potential subscribers grows, carriers
may achieve greater economies of scale and scope when deploying
facilities and providing service to those areas. In this way, granting
this waiver serves the public interest because doing so furthers the
Commission's goal of increasing the deployment of telecommunications
facilities in unserved and underserved
[[Page 21781]]
regions of the Nation, especially among Native American populations. We
emphasize that the action we take here does not affect state
sovereignty or impinge upon a state's ability to establish universal
service programs aimed at increasing telephone subscribership within
its borders.
10. Verizon opposes a waiver of Sec. 54.400(e) until such time as
the Commission determines how the term ``near reservation'' should be
defined. As noted above, however, Smith Bagley no longer requests the
Commission to designate the Eastern Navajo Agency as ``near
reservation'' land. Because we do not grant this waiver on the basis of
defining ``near reservation,'' we reject Verizon's argument.
11. Further, we are not persuaded by Verizon's argument that SBI's
Waiver Petition should be denied because states are in a better
position to address pockets of low subscribership in non-reservation
areas within their respective state. We agree that, in most instances,
it is more appropriate for states to implement Lifeline and Link-Up
programs designed for the specific needs of their state. Nothing in
this order is intended to prevent state action in this regard. Indeed,
the state of New Mexico is free to adopt measures to eradicate pockets
of low subscribership within its borders. We emphasize that, at the
present time, 67% of occupied housing units in the Eastern Navajo
Agency do not have telephone service. As we stated in the Twelfth
Report and Order, ``the unavailability or unaffordability of
telecommunications service on Tribal lands is at odds with our
statutory goal of ensuring access to such services to ``[c]onsumers in
all regions of the Nation, including low-income consumers.'' Although
the Eastern Navajo Agency is not entirely comprised of Tribal lands
under the Commission's definition, the area is almost exclusively
populated by Native Americans that suffer from the same conditions
present on other federally-recognized Tribal lands. The availability of
Tier 4 support program will provide immediate and vital benefits to
low-income consumers in the Eastern Navajo Agency, consistent with the
Commission's goal of enhancing telecommunications access among
consumers on Tribal lands and its responsibility to ensure a standard
of livability for members of Indian tribes.
III. Ordering Clause
12. Pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 254 of
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154, 254,
and the authority under Sec. 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR
1.3, the Waiver Petition filed by Smith Bagley, Inc., on November 15,
2004, is granted.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-8339 Filed 4-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P