Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Model Hawker 800XP Airplanes, 21616-21618 [05-8272]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
21616
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 27, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
$15.68 per ton of assessable olives was
derived by considering anticipated
expenses, the volume of assessable
olives first handled from the 2004–05
crop year, and additional pertinent
factors.
A review of historical and preliminary
information pertaining to the upcoming
fiscal year indicates that the grower
price for the 2004–05 crop year is
estimated to be approximately $720 per
ton for canning fruit and $276 per ton
for limited-use size fruit. Approximately
85 percent of a ton of olives are canning
fruit sizes and 10 percent are limiteduse sizes, leaving the balance as
unusable cull fruit. Total grower
revenue on 85,862 tons would then be
$54,917,335 given the percentage of
canning and limited-use sizes and
current grower prices for those sizes.
Therefore, with a $15.68 per ton
assessment rate, the estimated
assessment revenue is expected to be
approximately 2.33 percent of grower
revenue.
This action increases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers. While
assessments impose some additional
costs on handlers, the costs are minimal
and uniform on all handlers. Some of
the additional costs may be passed on
to producers. However, these costs are
offset by the benefits derived by the
operation of the marketing order. In
addition, the committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
California olive industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all committee meetings, the
December 13, 2004, meeting was a
public meeting and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express
views on this issue.
This rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on California olive handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on February 22, 2005 (70 FR
8545). Copies of the rule were mailed or
sent via facsimile to all committee
members and olive handlers. Finally,
the rule was made available through the
Internet by USDA and the Office of the
Federal Register. A 30-day comment
period was provided to allow interested
persons to respond to the proposal. One
comment was received, but that
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:56 Apr 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
comment was not relevant to this
rulemaking action.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) The 2005 fiscal year began
on January 1, 2005, and the marketing
order requires that the rate of
assessment for each fiscal year apply to
all assessable olives handled; (2) the
committee needs sufficient funds to pay
its expenses which are incurred on a
continuous basis; (3) handlers are aware
of this action, which was unanimously
recommended by the committee at a
public meeting and is similar to other
assessment rate actions issued in past
years; and (4) a 30-day comment period
was provided for in the proposed rule
and no relevant comments were
received.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932
Marketing agreements, Olives,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 932 is amended as
follows:
I
PART 932—OLIVES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part
932 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 932.230 is revised to read as
follows:
I
§ 932.230
Assessment rate.
On and after January 1, 2005, an
assessment rate of $15.68 per ton is
established for California olives.
Dated: April 21, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–8360 Filed 4–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20251; Directorate
Identifier 2004–NM–164–AD; Amendment
39–14071; AD 2005–09–03]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon
Model Hawker 800XP Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Raytheon Model Hawker 800XP
airplanes. This AD requires inspecting
to detect damage of certain wiring in the
flight compartment, performing
corrective actions if necessary,
modifying certain wiring connections,
and revising the airplane flight manual.
This AD is prompted by reports of
miswiring in the power distribution
system. We are issuing this AD to
ensure that the flightcrew is aware of
the source of battery power for certain
equipment, and to prevent damage to
wiring and surrounding equipment that
could result in smoke or fire on the
airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective June
1, 2005.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the AD is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of June 1, 2005.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Raytheon
Aircraft Company, Department 62, P.O.
Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201–0085.
Docket: The AD docket contains the
proposed AD, comments, and any final
disposition. You can examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Management Facility office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building at
the U.S. Department of Transportation,
400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL–401,
Washington, DC. This docket number is
FAA–2005–20251; the directorate
identifier for this docket is 2004–NM–
164–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Philip Petty, Aerospace Engineer,
Electrical Systems and Avionics, ACE–
119W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road,
E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM
27APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 27, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
room 100, Mid-Continent Airport,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316)
946–4139; fax (316) 946–4107.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
proposed to amend 14 CFR Part 39 with
an AD for certain Raytheon Model
Hawker 800XP airplanes. That action,
published in the Federal Register on
February 2, 2005 (70 FR 5387), proposed
to require inspecting to detect damage of
certain wiring in the flight
compartment, performing corrective
actions if necessary, modifying certain
wiring connections, and revising the
airplane flight manual.
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. No comments
have been submitted on the proposed
AD or on the determination of the cost
to the public.
21617
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the
available data and determined that air
safety and the public interest require
adopting the AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 45 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
The following table provides the
estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this AD.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Work hours
Inspection .................................................................
Modification ..............................................................
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:56 Apr 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
Average
labor rate
per hour
18
6
$65
65
Parts
None ........
435 ...........
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for
a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
I
2005–09–03 Raytheon Aircraft Company:
Amendment 39–14071. Docket No.
FAA–2005–20251; Directorate Identifier
2004–NM–164–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective June 1, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Raytheon Model
Hawker 800XP airplanes, certificated in any
category, serial numbers 258541, 258556, and
258567 through 258608 inclusive.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Cost per
airplane
$1,170
825
Number of
U.S.
-registered
airplanes
30
30
Fleet cost
$35,100
24,750
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by reports of
miswiring in the power distribution system.
We are issuing this AD to ensure that the
flightcrew is aware of the source of battery
power for certain equipment, and to prevent
damage to wiring and surrounding
equipment that could result in smoke or fire
on the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Service Information Reference
(f) The term ‘‘service bulletin,’’ as used in
this AD, means Raytheon Service Bulletin SB
24–3555, Revision 1, dated June 2004.
(1) Where the service bulletin specifies
contacting the manufacturer for information,
this proposed AD requires, before further
flight, contacting the Manager, Wichita
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA.
Then, before further flight, any applicable
action specified by the Manager, Wichita
ACO, must be accomplished in accordance
with a method approved by the Manager,
Wichita ACO.
(2) The service bulletin also refers to
Raytheon Hawker 800XP Temporary Change
P/N 140–590032–0005TC7, dated June 3,
2003, which is intended to be inserted into
the Emergency Procedures section of the
airplane flight manual to inform the
flightcrew which standby batteries provide
power to what equipment once the actions in
the service bulletin have been done.
(3) Where the service bulletin specifies to
report compliance information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
Inspection
(g) Within 50 flight hours or 30 days after
the effective date of this AD, whichever is
first: Perform a detailed inspection for
damage (primarily but not limited to
evidence of heat damage) of wiring in the
E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM
27APR1
21618
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 27, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
flight compartment, and all applicable
corrective actions, by doing all actions in Part
1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of the
service bulletin, except as provided by
paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(3) of this AD. Any
applicable corrective action must be done
before further flight.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 18,
2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–8272 Filed 4–26–05; 8:45 am]
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive
examination of a specific item, installation,
or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate.
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface
cleaning and elaborate procedures may be
required.’’
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Modification
(h) At the applicable time specified in
paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, modify
wiring in the flight compartment by doing all
actions in accordance with Part 2 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service
bulletin. Following accomplishment of the
actions in Part 2 of the service bulletin,
before further flight, do all actions associated
with the functional test, including revising
the Emergency Procedures section of the
Raytheon Hawker 800XP Airplane Flight
Manual to include the information in
Temporary Change P/N 140–590032–
0005TC7, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service
bulletin.
(1) If no damage was found during the
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD: Do paragraph (h) within 300 flight hours
or 180 days after the effective date of this AD,
whichever is first.
(2) If any damage is found during the
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD: Do paragraph (h) before further flight
after the damage is found.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(i) The Manager, Wichita ACO, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use Raytheon Service Bulletin
SB 24–3555, Revision 1, dated June 2004, to
perform the actions that are required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approves the
incorporation by reference of this document
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. For copies of the service information,
contact Raytheon Aircraft Company,
Department 62, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas
67201–0085. To view the AD docket, contact
the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh
Street SW., room PL–401, Nassif Building,
Washington, DC. To review copies of the
service information, contact the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at the NARA, call (202) 741–
6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_
federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:56 Apr 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 91
[Docket No. FAA–2004–19947; Amendment
No. 91–285]
RIN 2120–AI42
Pyrotechnic Signaling Device
Requirements
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Disposition of comments on
direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On December 27, 2004, the
FAA published a direct final rule to
remove the requirement for a
pyrotechnic signaling device required
for aircraft operated for hire over water
and beyond power off gliding distance
from shore for air carriers operating
under part 121 unless it is a part of a
required life raft. All other operators
continue to be required to have onboard
one pyrotechnic signaling device if they
operate aircraft for hire over water and
beyond power off gliding distance from
shore. The rule was effective February 7,
2005.
ADDRESSES: The complete docket for the
final rule on pyrotechnic signaling
devices may be examined through the
Department of Transportation’s Docket
Management System at https://
www.dms.dot.gov. Use the Simple
Search selection and type in the docket
number, 19947.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Keenan, AFS–200, Air Transportation
Division, Flight Standards Service,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202)
267–9579.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The final rule, request for comment,
was published in response to several
requests that the FAA eliminate the
requirement that aircraft that operate for
hire, over water, and beyond power off
gliding distance from shore, carry one
pyrotechnic signaling device in addition
to those signaling devices required as
part of each required life raft. The FAA
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
considered petitioners arguments that
the requirement of an additional
pyrotechnic device, or flare gun, was
unnecessary because other
requirements, such as air traffic control,
dispatch/flight following systems, and
advanced communications provide an
equivalent, if not greater, level of safety
as that provided by the pyrotechnic
signaling device. This requirement was
limited to those operators conducting
operations under Part 121 because all of
the additional safety redundancies, such
as dispatch/flight following, do not exist
to the same extent in other operations.
Discussion of Comments
The FAA received seven comments
on the pyrotechnic signaling device
final rule. Three were from individuals,
three were from air carriers (Southwest
Airlines, American Airlines, and Net
Jets), and one was from a trade
association (the Regional Airline
Association). Most comments favor the
change. One individual commenter did
not reflect support or opposition to the
change. None of the comments reflect an
adverse position to this final rule. The
FAA’s response to the comments
follows:
Safety
All but one commenter expressed
concerns about the safety and security
of pyrotechnic signaling devices. One
individual commenter stated that the
devices were a high-pilferage item and
pose a hazard of becoming a potential
terrorist weapon. Another individual
commenter expressed a general concern
about a security hazard to the flight
crew. Southwest Airlines and Net Jets
inferred that pyrotechnic signaling
devices are lethal weapons and
constitute hazardous materials on the
flight deck.
Three commenters, including
American Airlines, inferred that these
devices do not enhance safety.
Southwest Airlines stated that the
device would provide minimal value in
locating an aircraft following a ditching
at sea, assuming that a pilot could find
it.
The FAA does not agree that
pyrotechnic signaling devices are unsafe
if stored and maintained in accordance
with the manufacturer’s instructions
and personnel are properly trained in
their use. Pyrotechnic signaling devices
are still required whenever life rafts are
required to be onboard. The FAA does
not agree that a pyrotechnic signaling
device might be hard to locate in a
ditching emergency. FAA regulations
require a passenger briefing composed
of instructions to use in preparation for
a ditching. Part of this preparation
E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM
27APR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 27, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21616-21618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-8272]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2005-20251; Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-164-AD;
Amendment 39-14071; AD 2005-09-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Model Hawker 800XP Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Raytheon Model Hawker 800XP airplanes. This AD requires
inspecting to detect damage of certain wiring in the flight
compartment, performing corrective actions if necessary, modifying
certain wiring connections, and revising the airplane flight manual.
This AD is prompted by reports of miswiring in the power distribution
system. We are issuing this AD to ensure that the flightcrew is aware
of the source of battery power for certain equipment, and to prevent
damage to wiring and surrounding equipment that could result in smoke
or fire on the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective June 1, 2005.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the AD is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of June
1, 2005.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Raytheon Aircraft Company, Department 62, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas
67201-0085.
Docket: The AD docket contains the proposed AD, comments, and any
final disposition. You can examine the AD docket on the Internet at
https://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility
office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL-401,
Washington, DC. This docket number is FAA-2005-20251; the directorate
identifier for this docket is 2004-NM-164-AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Petty, Aerospace Engineer,
Electrical Systems and Avionics, ACE-119W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road,
[[Page 21617]]
room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316)
946-4139; fax (316) 946-4107.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR Part 39
with an AD for certain Raytheon Model Hawker 800XP airplanes. That
action, published in the Federal Register on February 2, 2005 (70 FR
5387), proposed to require inspecting to detect damage of certain
wiring in the flight compartment, performing corrective actions if
necessary, modifying certain wiring connections, and revising the
airplane flight manual.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. No comments have been submitted on the proposed
AD or on the determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that
air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 45 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs for
U.S. operators to comply with this AD.
Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Average Cost per U.S. -
Action Work hours labor rate Parts airplane registered Fleet cost
per hour airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection..................................... 18 $65 None............................ $1,170 30 $35,100
Modification................................... 6 65 435............................. 825 30 24,750
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to
examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2005-09-03 Raytheon Aircraft Company: Amendment 39-14071. Docket No.
FAA-2005-20251; Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-164-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective June 1, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Raytheon Model Hawker 800XP airplanes,
certificated in any category, serial numbers 258541, 258556, and
258567 through 258608 inclusive.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by reports of miswiring in the power
distribution system. We are issuing this AD to ensure that the
flightcrew is aware of the source of battery power for certain
equipment, and to prevent damage to wiring and surrounding equipment
that could result in smoke or fire on the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Service Information Reference
(f) The term ``service bulletin,'' as used in this AD, means
Raytheon Service Bulletin SB 24-3555, Revision 1, dated June 2004.
(1) Where the service bulletin specifies contacting the
manufacturer for information, this proposed AD requires, before
further flight, contacting the Manager, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA. Then, before further flight, any
applicable action specified by the Manager, Wichita ACO, must be
accomplished in accordance with a method approved by the Manager,
Wichita ACO.
(2) The service bulletin also refers to Raytheon Hawker 800XP
Temporary Change P/N 140-590032-0005TC7, dated June 3, 2003, which
is intended to be inserted into the Emergency Procedures section of
the airplane flight manual to inform the flightcrew which standby
batteries provide power to what equipment once the actions in the
service bulletin have been done.
(3) Where the service bulletin specifies to report compliance
information to the manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
Inspection
(g) Within 50 flight hours or 30 days after the effective date
of this AD, whichever is first: Perform a detailed inspection for
damage (primarily but not limited to evidence of heat damage) of
wiring in the
[[Page 21618]]
flight compartment, and all applicable corrective actions, by doing
all actions in Part 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of the
service bulletin, except as provided by paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(3)
of this AD. Any applicable corrective action must be done before
further flight.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
Modification
(h) At the applicable time specified in paragraph (h)(1) or
(h)(2) of this AD, modify wiring in the flight compartment by doing
all actions in accordance with Part 2 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of the service bulletin. Following accomplishment of
the actions in Part 2 of the service bulletin, before further
flight, do all actions associated with the functional test,
including revising the Emergency Procedures section of the Raytheon
Hawker 800XP Airplane Flight Manual to include the information in
Temporary Change P/N 140-590032-0005TC7, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin.
(1) If no damage was found during the inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD: Do paragraph (h) within 300 flight hours
or 180 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever is first.
(2) If any damage is found during the inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD: Do paragraph (h) before further flight
after the damage is found.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i) The Manager, Wichita ACO, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in
14 CFR 39.19.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use Raytheon Service Bulletin SB 24-3555, Revision
1, dated June 2004, to perform the actions that are required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director of the Federal
Register approves the incorporation by reference of this document in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. For copies of the
service information, contact Raytheon Aircraft Company, Department
62, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085. To view the AD docket,
contact the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., room PL-401, Nassif
Building, Washington, DC. To review copies of the service
information, contact the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at the NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 18, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-8272 Filed 4-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
