Classification of Certain Scientists of the Commonwealth of Independent States of the Former Soviet Union and the Baltic States as Employment-Based Immigrants, 21129-21132 [05-8176]
Download as PDF
21129
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 78
Monday, April 25, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
8 CFR Part 204
[CIS No. 2277–03; DHS–2004–0013]
RIN 1615–AB14
Classification of Certain Scientists of
the Commonwealth of Independent
States of the Former Soviet Union and
the Baltic States as EmploymentBased Immigrants
U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This interim rule implements
changes to the Soviet Scientists
Immigration Act of 1992 (SSIA), Public
Law 102–509, made by the Foreign
Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year
2003, Public Law 107–228. The SSIA, as
amended, reinstates the authority to
allot visas under section 203(b)(2)(A) of
the Immigration and Nationality (Act) to
eligible scientists or engineers of the
independent states of the former Soviet
Union and the Baltic states with
expertise in nuclear, chemical,
biological, or other high-technology
field or defense projects. This rule
amends the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) regulations to codify the
new sunset date of September 30, 2006
and the new numerical limit of 950
visas (excluding spouses and children if
accompanying or following to join). The
rule also modifies the evidence eligible
scientists or engineers must submit to
establish their expertise or work
experience in such high technology
fields or defense projects.
DATES: Effective date: This interim rule
is effective May 25, 2005.
Comment date: Comments must be
submitted on or before June 24, 2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:22 Apr 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
You may submit comments,
identified by CIS No. 2277–03 or DHS
2004–0013, by one of the following
methods:
• EPA Federal Partner EDOCKET Web
site: https://www.epa.gov/feddocket.
Follow instructions for submitting
comments on the Web site.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: rfs.regs@dhs.gov. When
submitting comments electronically,
please include CIS No. 2277–03 in the
subject line of the message.
• Mail: The Director, Regulatory
Management Division, U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services, Department
of Homeland Security, 111
Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 2nd Floor,
Washington, DC 20529. To ensure
proper handling, please reference CIS
No. 2277–03 on your correspondence.
This mailing address may also be used
for paper, disk, or CD–ROM
submissions.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services,
Department of Homeland Security, 111
Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 2nd Floor,
Washington, DC 20529. Contact
Telephone Number (202) 272–8377.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number (if available) or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
for this rulemaking. All comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.epa.gov/feddocket,
including any personal information
provided. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the ‘‘Public Participation’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
• Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.epa.gov/feddocket. You may also
access the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov.
Submitted comments may also be
inspected at the office of the Director,
Regulatory Management Division, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services,
Department of Homeland Security, 111
Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 2nd Floor,
Washington, DC 20529. To ensure
proper handling, please reference CIS
No. 2277–03 on your correspondence.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Efren Hernandez, Chief, Business and
Trade Branch, Program and Regulation
Department, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security, 111 Massachusetts
Avenue, NW., 3rd Floor, Washington,
DC 20529, telephone (202) 616–7959.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or
arguments on all aspects of the interim
rule. USCIS also invites comments that
relate to the economic, environmental,
or federalism affects that might result
from this interim rule. Comments that
will provide the most assistance to
USCIS in developing these procedures
will reference a specific portion of the
interim rule, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include data,
information, or authority that support
such recommended change. See
ADDRESSES above for information on
how to submit comments.
What Is the Soviet Scientists
Immigration Act of 1992?
The Soviet Scientists Immigration Act
of 1992 (SSIA) provided that up to 750
immigrant visas may be allotted under
section 203(b)(2)(A) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (Act) to eligible
scientists or engineers of the
independent states of the former Soviet
Union and the Baltic states (excluding
spouses and children if accompanying
or following to join), if the scientists or
engineers had expertise in nuclear,
chemical, biological or other high
technology fields or were working on
such high technology defense projects,
as defined by the Attorney General. This
program expired on October 24, 1996.
What Changes to the Soviet Scientists
Immigration Act Were Made by the
Foreign Relations Authorization Act,
Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–228)?
Section 1304 of the Foreign Relations
Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003,
amended the SSIA by:
(1) Reinstating the classification
authority for eligible scientists and
engineers under section 203(b)(2)(A) of
the Act;
(2) Reopening the eligibility period for
filing petitions for 4 years from the date
of enactment of the Foreign Relations
Authorization Act (September 30, 2002);
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
21130
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 78 / Monday, April 25, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(3) Raising the numerical limit for
visas under the program from 750 to
950;
(4) Precluding any scientist
previously admitted for lawful
permanent residence from benefits
under the SSIA as amended; and
(5) Requiring the Secretary of
Homeland Security to consult with the
Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense,
Secretary of Energy, and other heads of
appropriate agencies regarding previous
experiences with implementation of the
SSIA and any recommended changes in
the regulations prescribed under the
SSIA.
What Changes Is USCIS Making to Its
Regulations?
USCIS is amending § 204.10 as
follows:
8 CFR 204.10(a)
Section 204.10(a) is amended to
reflect the new sunset date of September
30, 2006 and numerical limit of 950 for
the number of visas that may be allotted
under section 203(b)(2)(A) of the Act
(excluding spouses and children if
accompanying or following to join).
8 CFR 204.10(b) and (c)
Current § 204.10(b) is redesignated as
§ 204.10(c) and amended to address
filing requirements and to specify which
USCIS office will have jurisdiction over
Form I–140s filed under the SSIA. New
§ 204.10(b) will now contain the
definitions governing this provision.
8 CFR 204.10(d)
Current § 204.10(c) is redesignated as
§ 204.10(d) and addresses the priority
dates of any petition filed for this
classification.
8 CFR 204.10(e)
Current § 204.10(e) is amended to
reflect new evidentiary requirements for
petitions filed by scientists and
engineers under the SSIA. Under the
original program (SSIA 1992–1996), the
regulations required applicants to
submit documentation relating to their
particular scientific expertise and prior
work experience. This required
documentation often proved difficult
not only to obtain but also to assess to
determine eligibility.
Based on discussions with the
Department of State, USCIS has
determined that a more effective
administration of the new program
(SSIA 2002–2006) can be achieved by
requiring each applicant to submit a
statement, signed by the Department of
State’s Bureau of Nonproliferation,
attesting to his or her qualifications or
expertise in nuclear, chemical,
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:22 Apr 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
biological or other high technology
fields or verifying his or her work on
such high technology defense projects.
The Bureau of Nonproliferation has
been in close contact with this group of
scientists and with organizations that
have employed them for a number of
years and is better suited to represent
the individual applicant’s qualifications
to USCIS. In addition, the Department of
State’s Visa Office usually coordinates
with the Bureau of Nonproliferation and
other appropriate agencies during the
security advisory opinion process when
a visa application involves a scientist or
engineer from the former Soviet Union.
USCIS has determined that this
coordination, and resulting assessment
by Department of State, is sufficient to
meet the consultation requirements of
the SSIA.
Accordingly, § 204.10(e) provides that
the signed statement issued by the
Department of State’s Bureau of
Nonproliferation will be considered in
lieu of the evidence of qualifications
previously required under the old
program. USCIS, however, reserves the
right to consult independently with the
Secretary of Defense, Secretary of
Energy and other appropriate agency
heads on the qualifications or expertise
of a potential applicant under the SSIA
and to accept favorable reports from
such agencies in addition to the letter
from the Department of State, Bureau of
Nonproliferation.
8 CFR 204.10(f) and (g)
USCIS is retaining current § 204.10(f)
and modifying § 204.10(g) to provide
that USCIS, in addition to consulting
with the Department of State’s Bureau of
Nonproliferation, in its discretion may
consult with other appropriate
government agencies and use favorable
reports from such agencies in addition
to the statement from the Bureau of
Nonproliferation.
8 CFR 204.10(h) and (i)
Current § 204.10(h) is redesignated as
§ 204.10(i) and divided into two
sections addressing approval and denial
of petitions. New § 204.10(h) codifies
section 4(a) of the SSIA, as amended,
which prohibits scientists previously
admitted to lawful permanent residence
from receiving benefits under the new
SSIA program.
8 CFR 204.10(j)
USCIS creates a new § 204.10(j) that
provides for the rejection and fee refund
of any petition once the program sunsets
or the numerical limits for the program
have been reached.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
How Can Potential Applicants Obtain a
Letter From the Department of State
Verifying Their Previous Work
Experience?
Before submitting the petition to
USCIS, the applicant must obtain a
letter from the Department of State’s
Bureau of Nonproliferation. Applicants
should submit a written request to the
Department of State indicating that they
are seeking to immigrate to the United
States or adjust status under the SSIA
program and requesting verification of
their relevant qualifications, expertise,
and work experience. Written requests
should be submitted to: Coordinator for
Science Centers, Office of Proliferation
Threat Reduction, NP/PTR, Room 3327,
U.S. Department of State, Washington,
DC 20520.
The Bureau of Nonproliferation will
review the alien’s expertise and prior
work experience and determine if the
expertise and experience are, in fact,
qualifying under the program. If the
Bureau determines that the applicant
has the requisite expertise and
experience, the Bureau of
Nonproliferation will issue a letter to
that effect for submission with the Form
I–140 visa petition.
Good Cause Exception
The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) has determined that
good cause exists under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B) to make this rule effective May
25, 2005, for the following reasons:
Section 1304 of the Foreign Relations
Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003
became effective immediately upon
enactment on September 30, 2002, and
will sunset by September 30, 2006. The
delay in publication of this interim rule
for consideration of public comments
prior to the effective date of the rule
would only serve to further limit the
remaining period within which
qualifying scientists or engineers may
file a Form I–140 petition for an
immigrant visa (or seek adjustment of
status to lawful permanent residence)
prior to September 30, 2006. DHS also
believes that pre-promulgation comment
is unnecessary because of the limited
number of individuals who may qualify
for or be affected by the SSIA (estimated
at 500); the non-controversial nature of
the implementation procedures; and the
security interests that are facilitated by
having a process in place for vetting
scientists and engineers who might be
authorized to work in the hightechnology fields or on the defense
projects that qualify under the SSIA
program. Publication of this rule as an
interim rule also will expedite
implementation of section 1304 by
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 78 / Monday, April 25, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
allowing aliens covered by the law to
apply for and obtain the benefits
available under the SSIA.
Accordingly, DHS finds that it would
be impracticable and contrary to the
public interest to delay implementation
of this rule to allow the prior notice and
comment period normally required
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). DHS
nevertheless invites written comments
on this interim rule and will consider
any timely comments in preparing the
final rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
DHS has reviewed this regulation in
accordance with the Regulatory and
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), and, by
approving it, certifies that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The SSIA, as amended, is
limited to 950 eligible independent
states and Baltic scientist. Form I–140s
generally will be filed by individual
aliens, or U.S. government entities filing
on behalf of such individuals, seeking
classification under section 203(b)(2)(A)
of the Act. These petitioners are not
considered small entities as that term is
defined in 5 U.S.C. 601(6).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by state, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This rule will not
result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
Executive Order 12866
This rule is considered by DHS to be
a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866, section 3(f),
Regulatory Planning and Review.
Accordingly, this regulation has been
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:22 Apr 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
DHS has assessed both the costs and
benefits of this rule as required by
Executive Order 12866, section 1(b)(6)
and has made a reasoned determination
that the benefits of this regulation justify
its costs. Briefly, that assessment is as
follows: The rule will enhance the
ability of DHS to administer this very
limited program. There are no costs to
the public associated with this rule,
except the fee for filing the Form I–140
petition which is borne by the
applicant. The $190 fee for the Form I–
140 petition was established to cover
the administrative costs of processing
the petition. DHS estimates that there
are approximately 500 visa numbers
available under this program: 300
unused visas from the initial SSIA
program before it expired and 200 new
visas based in the increase in the
numerical limit from 750 to 950. DHS
estimates that the total cost for this
program will be $95,000 (500 × $190
filing fee for the Form I–140). The
program benefits the individual
scientist-beneficiaries who gain access
to the U.S. job market and other benefits
available to permanent resident aliens.
Also, the security of the United States
is enhanced because the skills and
knowledge of these scientists can be
used within the United States rather
than by governments or other
organizations potentially inimical to the
national security.
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this
rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement.
Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice
Reform
This rule meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This interim rule requires a petitioner
to submit a letter from the Department
of State, Bureau of Nonproliferation,
addressing the petitioner’s scientific or
engineering qualifications. Previously
USCIS captured this information under
the Form ETA 750B, OMB No. 44–
R1301, as part of the evidence
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21131
requirements contained in the
instructions to the Form I–140. The
State Department letter will be used in
lieu of the Form ETA 750B. Therefore,
petitioners will no longer be required to
provide information in support of, or
complete, the Form ETA 750B, and the
burden hours associated with the Form
ETA 750B for this program are removed.
Since the letter will be generated by the
Department of State and issued to the
petitioner for submission with the Form
I–140, there are no additional
information collections. Also, there are
no additional information collections
associated with the Form I–140 (OMB
No. 1615–0015).
List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 204
Administrative practice and
procedure, Immigration, Reporting and
record keeping requirements.
I Accordingly, part 204 of chapter I of
title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations
is amended as follows:
PART 204—IMMIGRANT PETITIONS
1. The authority citation for part 204
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103, 1151, 1153,
1154, 1182, 1186a, 1255, 1641; 8 CFR part 2.
2. Section 204.10 is revised to read as
follows:
I
§ 204.10 Petitions by, or for, certain
scientists of the Commonwealth of
Independent States or the Baltic states.
(a) General. A petition to classify an
alien under section 203(b)(2) of the Act
as a scientist or engineer of the eligible
independent states of the former Soviet
Union or the Baltic states must be filed
on Form I–140, Immigrant Petition for
Alien Worker. The petition may be filed
by the alien, or anyone in the alien’s
behalf. USCIS must approve a petition
filed on behalf of the alien on or before
September 30, 2006, or until 950
petitions have been approved on behalf
of eligible scientists, whichever is
earliest.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section
the term:
Baltic states mean the sovereign
nations of Latvia, Lithuania, and
Estonia.
Eligible independent states and Baltic
scientists means aliens:
(1) Who are nationals of any of the
independent states of the former Soviet
Union or the Baltic states; and
(2) Who are scientists or engineers
who have expertise in nuclear,
chemical, biological, or other hightechnology field which is clearly
applicable to the design, development,
or production of ballistic missiles,
nuclear, biological, chemical, or other
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
21132
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 78 / Monday, April 25, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
high-technology weapons of mass
destruction, or who are working on
nuclear, chemical, biological, or other
high-technology defense projects, as
defined by the Secretary of Homeland
Security, that are clearly applicable to
the design, development, and
production of ballistic missiles, nuclear,
biological, chemical, or other hightechnology weapons of mass
destruction.
Independent states of the former
Soviet Union means the sovereign
nations of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus,
Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan,
Turkmenistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan.
(c) Filing requirements. (1)
Application form and time limits. A
petition to classify an alien under
section 203(b)(2)(A) of the Act as a
scientist from the eligible independent
states of the former Soviet Union or the
Baltic states must be filed on Form I–
140, Immigrant Petition for Alien
Worker. The petition may be filed by the
alien, or by anyone on the alien’s behalf.
Such petition must be properly filed
with all initial evidence described in
paragraph (e) of this section by
September 30, 2006 or before the limit
of 950 visas has been reached,
whichever is earliest. To clarify that the
petition is for a Soviet scientist, the
petitioner should clearly print the
words ‘‘SOVIET SCIENTIST’’ in Part 2
of Form I–140 and check block ‘‘d’’,
indicating the petition is for a member
of the professions holding an advanced
degree or an alien of exceptional ability.
(2) Jurisdiction. Form I–140 must be
filed with the service center having
jurisdiction over the alien’s place of
intended residence in the United States.
(d) Priority date. The priority date of
any petition filed for this classification
is the date the completed, signed
petition (including all initial evidence
as defined in paragraph (e) of this
section and the correct fee) is properly
filed with the USCIS.
(e) Initial evidence. The petition must
be accompanied by:
(1) Evidence that the alien is a
national of one of the independent
states of the former Soviet Union or one
of the Baltic States as defined in
paragraph (b) of this section. Such
evidence may include, but is not limited
to, identifying page(s) from a passport
issued by the former Soviet Union, or by
one of the independent or Baltic states;
and
(2) A letter from the Department of
State, Bureau of Nonproliferation that
verifies that the alien possesses
expertise in nuclear, chemical,
biological, or other high-technology
field or who has prior or current work
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:22 Apr 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
experience in high-technology defense
projects which are clearly applicable to
the design, development, or production
of ballistic missiles, nuclear, biological,
chemical, or other high-technology
weapons of mass destruction and
endorses the applicant as having
exceptional ability in one or more of
these fields. Such endorsement shall
establish that the alien possesses
exceptional ability in the relevant field.
(f) No offer of employment required.
Neither an offer of employment nor a
labor certification is required for this
classification.
(g) Consultation with other United
States Government agencies. USCIS may
consult with other United States
Government agencies, such as the
Departments of Defense and Energy or
other relevant agencies with expertise in
nuclear, chemical, biological, or other
high-technology defense projects. USCIS
may, in its discretion, accept a favorable
report from such agencies as evidence in
addition to the documentation
prescribed under paragraph (e) of this
section.
(h) Aliens previously granted
permanent residence. No alien
previously granted lawful permanent
residence may request or be granted
classification or any benefits under this
provision.
(i) Decision. (1) Approval. If the
petition is approved and the beneficiary
is outside the United States the
applicant will be notified of the
decision and the petition will be
forwarded to the National Visa Center.
If the beneficiary is in the United States
and seeks to apply for adjustment of
status, the petition will be retained by
USCIS.
(2) Denial. If the petition is denied,
the petitioner will be advised of the
decision and of the right to appeal in
accordance with 8 CFR part 103.
(j) Rejection. Petitions filed under this
provision on or after September 30,
2006 or after the limit of 950 visas has
been reached will be rejected and the
fee refunded.
Dated: April 15, 2005.
Michael Chertoff,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–8176 Filed 4–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–10–P
PO 00000
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 229
[Regulation CC; Docket No. R–1228]
Availability of Funds and Collection of
Checks
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Board of Governors is
amending appendix A of Regulation CC
to delete the reference to the Salt Lake
City branch office of the Federal Reserve
Bank of San Francisco and reassign the
Federal Reserve routing symbols
currently listed under that office to the
Denver branch office of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Kansas City. These
amendments will ensure that the
information in appendix A accurately
describes the actual structure of check
processing operations within the
Federal Reserve System.
DATES: The final rule will become
effective on June 18, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack
K. Walton II, Assistant Director (202/
452–2660), or Joseph P. Baressi, Senior
Financial Services Analyst (202/452–
3959), Division of Reserve Bank
Operations and Payment Systems; or
Adrianne G. Threatt, Counsel (202/452–
3554), Legal Division. For users of
Telecommunications Devices for the
Deaf (TDD) only, contact 202/263–4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulation
CC establishes the maximum period a
depositary bank may wait between
receiving a deposit and making the
deposited funds available for
withdrawal.1 A depositary bank
generally must provide faster
availability for funds deposited by a
local check than by a nonlocal check. A
check drawn on a bank is considered
local if it is payable by or at a bank
located in the same Federal Reserve
check processing region as the
depositary bank. A check drawn on a
nonbank is considered local if it is
payable through a bank located in the
same Federal Reserve check processing
region as the depositary bank. Checks
that do not meet the requirements for
local checks are considered nonlocal.
Appendix A to Regulation CC
contains a routing number guide that
assists banks in identifying local and
nonlocal banks and thereby determining
the maximum permissible hold periods
1 For purposes of Regulation CC, the term ‘‘bank’’
refers to any depository institution, including
commercial banks, savings institutions, and credit
unions.
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 78 (Monday, April 25, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21129-21132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-8176]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 78 / Monday, April 25, 2005 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 21129]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Part 204
[CIS No. 2277-03; DHS-2004-0013]
RIN 1615-AB14
Classification of Certain Scientists of the Commonwealth of
Independent States of the Former Soviet Union and the Baltic States as
Employment-Based Immigrants
AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Homeland Security.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This interim rule implements changes to the Soviet Scientists
Immigration Act of 1992 (SSIA), Public Law 102-509, made by the Foreign
Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003, Public Law 107-228. The
SSIA, as amended, reinstates the authority to allot visas under section
203(b)(2)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality (Act) to eligible
scientists or engineers of the independent states of the former Soviet
Union and the Baltic states with expertise in nuclear, chemical,
biological, or other high-technology field or defense projects. This
rule amends the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regulations to
codify the new sunset date of September 30, 2006 and the new numerical
limit of 950 visas (excluding spouses and children if accompanying or
following to join). The rule also modifies the evidence eligible
scientists or engineers must submit to establish their expertise or
work experience in such high technology fields or defense projects.
DATES: Effective date: This interim rule is effective May 25, 2005.
Comment date: Comments must be submitted on or before June 24,
2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by CIS No. 2277-03 or
DHS 2004-0013, by one of the following methods:
EPA Federal Partner EDOCKET Web site: https://www.epa.gov/
feddocket. Follow instructions for submitting comments on the Web site.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: rfs.regs@dhs.gov. When submitting comments
electronically, please include CIS No. 2277-03 in the subject line of
the message.
Mail: The Director, Regulatory Management Division, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security,
111 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20529. To
ensure proper handling, please reference CIS No. 2277-03 on your
correspondence. This mailing address may also be used for paper, disk,
or CD-ROM submissions.
Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services, Department of Homeland Security, 111 Massachusetts Avenue,
NW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20529. Contact Telephone Number (202)
272-8377.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number (if available) or Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
for this rulemaking. All comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.epa.gov/feddocket, including any personal
information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Public
Participation'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background
documents or comments received, go to https://www.epa.gov/feddocket. You
may also access the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Submitted comments may also be inspected at the
office of the Director, Regulatory Management Division, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security,
111 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20529. To
ensure proper handling, please reference CIS No. 2277-03 on your
correspondence.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Efren Hernandez, Chief, Business and
Trade Branch, Program and Regulation Department, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 111
Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20529, telephone
(202) 616-7959.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or arguments on all aspects of the
interim rule. USCIS also invites comments that relate to the economic,
environmental, or federalism affects that might result from this
interim rule. Comments that will provide the most assistance to USCIS
in developing these procedures will reference a specific portion of the
interim rule, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include data, information, or authority that support such recommended
change. See ADDRESSES above for information on how to submit comments.
What Is the Soviet Scientists Immigration Act of 1992?
The Soviet Scientists Immigration Act of 1992 (SSIA) provided that
up to 750 immigrant visas may be allotted under section 203(b)(2)(A) of
the Immigration and Nationality Act (Act) to eligible scientists or
engineers of the independent states of the former Soviet Union and the
Baltic states (excluding spouses and children if accompanying or
following to join), if the scientists or engineers had expertise in
nuclear, chemical, biological or other high technology fields or were
working on such high technology defense projects, as defined by the
Attorney General. This program expired on October 24, 1996.
What Changes to the Soviet Scientists Immigration Act Were Made by the
Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-
228)?
Section 1304 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal
Year 2003, amended the SSIA by:
(1) Reinstating the classification authority for eligible
scientists and engineers under section 203(b)(2)(A) of the Act;
(2) Reopening the eligibility period for filing petitions for 4
years from the date of enactment of the Foreign Relations Authorization
Act (September 30, 2002);
[[Page 21130]]
(3) Raising the numerical limit for visas under the program from
750 to 950;
(4) Precluding any scientist previously admitted for lawful
permanent residence from benefits under the SSIA as amended; and
(5) Requiring the Secretary of Homeland Security to consult with
the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Energy, and
other heads of appropriate agencies regarding previous experiences with
implementation of the SSIA and any recommended changes in the
regulations prescribed under the SSIA.
What Changes Is USCIS Making to Its Regulations?
USCIS is amending Sec. 204.10 as follows:
8 CFR 204.10(a)
Section 204.10(a) is amended to reflect the new sunset date of
September 30, 2006 and numerical limit of 950 for the number of visas
that may be allotted under section 203(b)(2)(A) of the Act (excluding
spouses and children if accompanying or following to join).
8 CFR 204.10(b) and (c)
Current Sec. 204.10(b) is redesignated as Sec. 204.10(c) and
amended to address filing requirements and to specify which USCIS
office will have jurisdiction over Form I-140s filed under the SSIA.
New Sec. 204.10(b) will now contain the definitions governing this
provision.
8 CFR 204.10(d)
Current Sec. 204.10(c) is redesignated as Sec. 204.10(d) and
addresses the priority dates of any petition filed for this
classification.
8 CFR 204.10(e)
Current Sec. 204.10(e) is amended to reflect new evidentiary
requirements for petitions filed by scientists and engineers under the
SSIA. Under the original program (SSIA 1992-1996), the regulations
required applicants to submit documentation relating to their
particular scientific expertise and prior work experience. This
required documentation often proved difficult not only to obtain but
also to assess to determine eligibility.
Based on discussions with the Department of State, USCIS has
determined that a more effective administration of the new program
(SSIA 2002-2006) can be achieved by requiring each applicant to submit
a statement, signed by the Department of State's Bureau of
Nonproliferation, attesting to his or her qualifications or expertise
in nuclear, chemical, biological or other high technology fields or
verifying his or her work on such high technology defense projects. The
Bureau of Nonproliferation has been in close contact with this group of
scientists and with organizations that have employed them for a number
of years and is better suited to represent the individual applicant's
qualifications to USCIS. In addition, the Department of State's Visa
Office usually coordinates with the Bureau of Nonproliferation and
other appropriate agencies during the security advisory opinion process
when a visa application involves a scientist or engineer from the
former Soviet Union. USCIS has determined that this coordination, and
resulting assessment by Department of State, is sufficient to meet the
consultation requirements of the SSIA.
Accordingly, Sec. 204.10(e) provides that the signed statement
issued by the Department of State's Bureau of Nonproliferation will be
considered in lieu of the evidence of qualifications previously
required under the old program. USCIS, however, reserves the right to
consult independently with the Secretary of Defense, Secretary of
Energy and other appropriate agency heads on the qualifications or
expertise of a potential applicant under the SSIA and to accept
favorable reports from such agencies in addition to the letter from the
Department of State, Bureau of Nonproliferation.
8 CFR 204.10(f) and (g)
USCIS is retaining current Sec. 204.10(f) and modifying Sec.
204.10(g) to provide that USCIS, in addition to consulting with the
Department of State's Bureau of Nonproliferation, in its discretion may
consult with other appropriate government agencies and use favorable
reports from such agencies in addition to the statement from the Bureau
of Nonproliferation.
8 CFR 204.10(h) and (i)
Current Sec. 204.10(h) is redesignated as Sec. 204.10(i) and
divided into two sections addressing approval and denial of petitions.
New Sec. 204.10(h) codifies section 4(a) of the SSIA, as amended,
which prohibits scientists previously admitted to lawful permanent
residence from receiving benefits under the new SSIA program.
8 CFR 204.10(j)
USCIS creates a new Sec. 204.10(j) that provides for the rejection
and fee refund of any petition once the program sunsets or the
numerical limits for the program have been reached.
How Can Potential Applicants Obtain a Letter From the Department of
State Verifying Their Previous Work Experience?
Before submitting the petition to USCIS, the applicant must obtain
a letter from the Department of State's Bureau of Nonproliferation.
Applicants should submit a written request to the Department of State
indicating that they are seeking to immigrate to the United States or
adjust status under the SSIA program and requesting verification of
their relevant qualifications, expertise, and work experience. Written
requests should be submitted to: Coordinator for Science Centers,
Office of Proliferation Threat Reduction, NP/PTR, Room 3327, U.S.
Department of State, Washington, DC 20520.
The Bureau of Nonproliferation will review the alien's expertise
and prior work experience and determine if the expertise and experience
are, in fact, qualifying under the program. If the Bureau determines
that the applicant has the requisite expertise and experience, the
Bureau of Nonproliferation will issue a letter to that effect for
submission with the Form I-140 visa petition.
Good Cause Exception
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has determined that good
cause exists under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) to make this rule effective May
25, 2005, for the following reasons: Section 1304 of the Foreign
Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 became effective
immediately upon enactment on September 30, 2002, and will sunset by
September 30, 2006. The delay in publication of this interim rule for
consideration of public comments prior to the effective date of the
rule would only serve to further limit the remaining period within
which qualifying scientists or engineers may file a Form I-140 petition
for an immigrant visa (or seek adjustment of status to lawful permanent
residence) prior to September 30, 2006. DHS also believes that pre-
promulgation comment is unnecessary because of the limited number of
individuals who may qualify for or be affected by the SSIA (estimated
at 500); the non-controversial nature of the implementation procedures;
and the security interests that are facilitated by having a process in
place for vetting scientists and engineers who might be authorized to
work in the high-technology fields or on the defense projects that
qualify under the SSIA program. Publication of this rule as an interim
rule also will expedite implementation of section 1304 by
[[Page 21131]]
allowing aliens covered by the law to apply for and obtain the benefits
available under the SSIA.
Accordingly, DHS finds that it would be impracticable and contrary
to the public interest to delay implementation of this rule to allow
the prior notice and comment period normally required under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B). DHS nevertheless invites written comments on this interim
rule and will consider any timely comments in preparing the final rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
DHS has reviewed this regulation in accordance with the Regulatory
and Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), and, by approving it, certifies
that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The SSIA, as amended, is limited
to 950 eligible independent states and Baltic scientist. Form I-140s
generally will be filed by individual aliens, or U.S. government
entities filing on behalf of such individuals, seeking classification
under section 203(b)(2)(A) of the Act. These petitioners are not
considered small entities as that term is defined in 5 U.S.C. 601(6).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by state, local and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
Executive Order 12866
This rule is considered by DHS to be a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning
and Review. Accordingly, this regulation has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review.
DHS has assessed both the costs and benefits of this rule as
required by Executive Order 12866, section 1(b)(6) and has made a
reasoned determination that the benefits of this regulation justify its
costs. Briefly, that assessment is as follows: The rule will enhance
the ability of DHS to administer this very limited program. There are
no costs to the public associated with this rule, except the fee for
filing the Form I-140 petition which is borne by the applicant. The
$190 fee for the Form I-140 petition was established to cover the
administrative costs of processing the petition. DHS estimates that
there are approximately 500 visa numbers available under this program:
300 unused visas from the initial SSIA program before it expired and
200 new visas based in the increase in the numerical limit from 750 to
950. DHS estimates that the total cost for this program will be $95,000
(500 x $190 filing fee for the Form I-140). The program benefits the
individual scientist-beneficiaries who gain access to the U.S. job
market and other benefits available to permanent resident aliens. Also,
the security of the United States is enhanced because the skills and
knowledge of these scientists can be used within the United States
rather than by governments or other organizations potentially inimical
to the national security.
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the National Government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of
Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement.
Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This interim rule requires a petitioner to submit a letter from the
Department of State, Bureau of Nonproliferation, addressing the
petitioner's scientific or engineering qualifications. Previously USCIS
captured this information under the Form ETA 750B, OMB No. 44-R1301, as
part of the evidence requirements contained in the instructions to the
Form I-140. The State Department letter will be used in lieu of the
Form ETA 750B. Therefore, petitioners will no longer be required to
provide information in support of, or complete, the Form ETA 750B, and
the burden hours associated with the Form ETA 750B for this program are
removed. Since the letter will be generated by the Department of State
and issued to the petitioner for submission with the Form I-140, there
are no additional information collections. Also, there are no
additional information collections associated with the Form I-140 (OMB
No. 1615-0015).
List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 204
Administrative practice and procedure, Immigration, Reporting and
record keeping requirements.
0
Accordingly, part 204 of chapter I of title 8 of the Code of Federal
Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 204--IMMIGRANT PETITIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 204 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103, 1151, 1153, 1154, 1182, 1186a,
1255, 1641; 8 CFR part 2.
0
2. Section 204.10 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 204.10 Petitions by, or for, certain scientists of the
Commonwealth of Independent States or the Baltic states.
(a) General. A petition to classify an alien under section
203(b)(2) of the Act as a scientist or engineer of the eligible
independent states of the former Soviet Union or the Baltic states must
be filed on Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker. The
petition may be filed by the alien, or anyone in the alien's behalf.
USCIS must approve a petition filed on behalf of the alien on or before
September 30, 2006, or until 950 petitions have been approved on behalf
of eligible scientists, whichever is earliest.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section the term:
Baltic states mean the sovereign nations of Latvia, Lithuania, and
Estonia.
Eligible independent states and Baltic scientists means aliens:
(1) Who are nationals of any of the independent states of the
former Soviet Union or the Baltic states; and
(2) Who are scientists or engineers who have expertise in nuclear,
chemical, biological, or other high-technology field which is clearly
applicable to the design, development, or production of ballistic
missiles, nuclear, biological, chemical, or other
[[Page 21132]]
high-technology weapons of mass destruction, or who are working on
nuclear, chemical, biological, or other high-technology defense
projects, as defined by the Secretary of Homeland Security, that are
clearly applicable to the design, development, and production of
ballistic missiles, nuclear, biological, chemical, or other high-
technology weapons of mass destruction.
Independent states of the former Soviet Union means the sovereign
nations of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine and
Uzbekistan.
(c) Filing requirements. (1) Application form and time limits. A
petition to classify an alien under section 203(b)(2)(A) of the Act as
a scientist from the eligible independent states of the former Soviet
Union or the Baltic states must be filed on Form I-140, Immigrant
Petition for Alien Worker. The petition may be filed by the alien, or
by anyone on the alien's behalf. Such petition must be properly filed
with all initial evidence described in paragraph (e) of this section by
September 30, 2006 or before the limit of 950 visas has been reached,
whichever is earliest. To clarify that the petition is for a Soviet
scientist, the petitioner should clearly print the words ``SOVIET
SCIENTIST'' in Part 2 of Form I-140 and check block ``d'', indicating
the petition is for a member of the professions holding an advanced
degree or an alien of exceptional ability.
(2) Jurisdiction. Form I-140 must be filed with the service center
having jurisdiction over the alien's place of intended residence in the
United States.
(d) Priority date. The priority date of any petition filed for this
classification is the date the completed, signed petition (including
all initial evidence as defined in paragraph (e) of this section and
the correct fee) is properly filed with the USCIS.
(e) Initial evidence. The petition must be accompanied by:
(1) Evidence that the alien is a national of one of the independent
states of the former Soviet Union or one of the Baltic States as
defined in paragraph (b) of this section. Such evidence may include,
but is not limited to, identifying page(s) from a passport issued by
the former Soviet Union, or by one of the independent or Baltic states;
and
(2) A letter from the Department of State, Bureau of
Nonproliferation that verifies that the alien possesses expertise in
nuclear, chemical, biological, or other high-technology field or who
has prior or current work experience in high-technology defense
projects which are clearly applicable to the design, development, or
production of ballistic missiles, nuclear, biological, chemical, or
other high-technology weapons of mass destruction and endorses the
applicant as having exceptional ability in one or more of these fields.
Such endorsement shall establish that the alien possesses exceptional
ability in the relevant field.
(f) No offer of employment required. Neither an offer of employment
nor a labor certification is required for this classification.
(g) Consultation with other United States Government agencies.
USCIS may consult with other United States Government agencies, such as
the Departments of Defense and Energy or other relevant agencies with
expertise in nuclear, chemical, biological, or other high-technology
defense projects. USCIS may, in its discretion, accept a favorable
report from such agencies as evidence in addition to the documentation
prescribed under paragraph (e) of this section.
(h) Aliens previously granted permanent residence. No alien
previously granted lawful permanent residence may request or be granted
classification or any benefits under this provision.
(i) Decision. (1) Approval. If the petition is approved and the
beneficiary is outside the United States the applicant will be notified
of the decision and the petition will be forwarded to the National Visa
Center. If the beneficiary is in the United States and seeks to apply
for adjustment of status, the petition will be retained by USCIS.
(2) Denial. If the petition is denied, the petitioner will be
advised of the decision and of the right to appeal in accordance with 8
CFR part 103.
(j) Rejection. Petitions filed under this provision on or after
September 30, 2006 or after the limit of 950 visas has been reached
will be rejected and the fee refunded.
Dated: April 15, 2005.
Michael Chertoff,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-8176 Filed 4-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-P