Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks, 21132-21134 [05-8152]

Download as PDF 21132 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 78 / Monday, April 25, 2005 / Rules and Regulations high-technology weapons of mass destruction, or who are working on nuclear, chemical, biological, or other high-technology defense projects, as defined by the Secretary of Homeland Security, that are clearly applicable to the design, development, and production of ballistic missiles, nuclear, biological, chemical, or other hightechnology weapons of mass destruction. Independent states of the former Soviet Union means the sovereign nations of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan. (c) Filing requirements. (1) Application form and time limits. A petition to classify an alien under section 203(b)(2)(A) of the Act as a scientist from the eligible independent states of the former Soviet Union or the Baltic states must be filed on Form I– 140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker. The petition may be filed by the alien, or by anyone on the alien’s behalf. Such petition must be properly filed with all initial evidence described in paragraph (e) of this section by September 30, 2006 or before the limit of 950 visas has been reached, whichever is earliest. To clarify that the petition is for a Soviet scientist, the petitioner should clearly print the words ‘‘SOVIET SCIENTIST’’ in Part 2 of Form I–140 and check block ‘‘d’’, indicating the petition is for a member of the professions holding an advanced degree or an alien of exceptional ability. (2) Jurisdiction. Form I–140 must be filed with the service center having jurisdiction over the alien’s place of intended residence in the United States. (d) Priority date. The priority date of any petition filed for this classification is the date the completed, signed petition (including all initial evidence as defined in paragraph (e) of this section and the correct fee) is properly filed with the USCIS. (e) Initial evidence. The petition must be accompanied by: (1) Evidence that the alien is a national of one of the independent states of the former Soviet Union or one of the Baltic States as defined in paragraph (b) of this section. Such evidence may include, but is not limited to, identifying page(s) from a passport issued by the former Soviet Union, or by one of the independent or Baltic states; and (2) A letter from the Department of State, Bureau of Nonproliferation that verifies that the alien possesses expertise in nuclear, chemical, biological, or other high-technology field or who has prior or current work VerDate jul<14>2003 15:22 Apr 22, 2005 Jkt 205001 experience in high-technology defense projects which are clearly applicable to the design, development, or production of ballistic missiles, nuclear, biological, chemical, or other high-technology weapons of mass destruction and endorses the applicant as having exceptional ability in one or more of these fields. Such endorsement shall establish that the alien possesses exceptional ability in the relevant field. (f) No offer of employment required. Neither an offer of employment nor a labor certification is required for this classification. (g) Consultation with other United States Government agencies. USCIS may consult with other United States Government agencies, such as the Departments of Defense and Energy or other relevant agencies with expertise in nuclear, chemical, biological, or other high-technology defense projects. USCIS may, in its discretion, accept a favorable report from such agencies as evidence in addition to the documentation prescribed under paragraph (e) of this section. (h) Aliens previously granted permanent residence. No alien previously granted lawful permanent residence may request or be granted classification or any benefits under this provision. (i) Decision. (1) Approval. If the petition is approved and the beneficiary is outside the United States the applicant will be notified of the decision and the petition will be forwarded to the National Visa Center. If the beneficiary is in the United States and seeks to apply for adjustment of status, the petition will be retained by USCIS. (2) Denial. If the petition is denied, the petitioner will be advised of the decision and of the right to appeal in accordance with 8 CFR part 103. (j) Rejection. Petitions filed under this provision on or after September 30, 2006 or after the limit of 950 visas has been reached will be rejected and the fee refunded. Dated: April 15, 2005. Michael Chertoff, Secretary. [FR Doc. 05–8176 Filed 4–22–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–10–P PO 00000 FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 12 CFR Part 229 [Regulation CC; Docket No. R–1228] Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Board of Governors is amending appendix A of Regulation CC to delete the reference to the Salt Lake City branch office of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and reassign the Federal Reserve routing symbols currently listed under that office to the Denver branch office of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. These amendments will ensure that the information in appendix A accurately describes the actual structure of check processing operations within the Federal Reserve System. DATES: The final rule will become effective on June 18, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack K. Walton II, Assistant Director (202/ 452–2660), or Joseph P. Baressi, Senior Financial Services Analyst (202/452– 3959), Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems; or Adrianne G. Threatt, Counsel (202/452– 3554), Legal Division. For users of Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf (TDD) only, contact 202/263–4869. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulation CC establishes the maximum period a depositary bank may wait between receiving a deposit and making the deposited funds available for withdrawal.1 A depositary bank generally must provide faster availability for funds deposited by a local check than by a nonlocal check. A check drawn on a bank is considered local if it is payable by or at a bank located in the same Federal Reserve check processing region as the depositary bank. A check drawn on a nonbank is considered local if it is payable through a bank located in the same Federal Reserve check processing region as the depositary bank. Checks that do not meet the requirements for local checks are considered nonlocal. Appendix A to Regulation CC contains a routing number guide that assists banks in identifying local and nonlocal banks and thereby determining the maximum permissible hold periods 1 For purposes of Regulation CC, the term ‘‘bank’’ refers to any depository institution, including commercial banks, savings institutions, and credit unions. Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM 25APR1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 78 / Monday, April 25, 2005 / Rules and Regulations for most deposited checks. The appendix includes a list of each Federal Reserve check processing office and the first four digits of the routing number, known as the Federal Reserve routing symbol, of each bank that is served by that office for check processing purposes. Banks whose Federal Reserve routing symbols are grouped under the same office are in the same check processing region and thus are local to one another. As explained in detail in the Board’s final rule published in the Federal Register on September 28, 2004, the Federal Reserve Banks have decided to reduce further the number of locations at which they process checks.2 The amendments set forth in this notice are part of a series of appendix A amendments related to that decision, and the Board will issue separate notices for each phase of the restructuring.3 As part of the restructuring process, the Salt Lake City branch office of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco will cease processing checks on June 18, 2005, and banks with routing symbols currently assigned to that office for check processing purposes will be reassigned to the Denver branch office of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. As a result of these changes, some checks that are drawn on and deposited at banks located in the affected check processing regions and that currently are nonlocal checks will become local checks subject to faster availability schedules. Because the Denver branch office check processing region will serve banks located in more than one Federal Reserve District, banks located in the expanded Denver check processing region cannot determine that a check is nonlocal solely because the paying bank for that check is located in another Federal Reserve district. To assist banks in identifying local and nonlocal banks, the Board accordingly is amending the lists of routing symbols associated with the Federal Reserve Banks of San Francisco and Kansas City to conform to the transfer of operations from the San Francisco Reserve Bank’s Salt Lake City branch office to the Kansas City Reserve Bank’s Denver branch office. To coincide with the effective date of the 2 See 69 FR 57837, September 28, 2004. addition to the general advance notice of future amendments provided by the Board, and the Board’s notices of final amendments, the Reserve Banks are striving to inform affected depository institutions of the exact date of each office transition at least 120 days in advance. The Reserve Banks’ communications to affected depository institutions are available at https:// www.frbservices.org. 3 In VerDate jul<14>2003 15:22 Apr 22, 2005 Jkt 205001 21133 underlying check processing changes, the amendments are effective June 18, 2005. The Board is providing advance notice of these amendments to give affected banks ample time to make any needed processing changes. The advance notice also will enable affected banks to amend their availability schedules and related disclosures, if necessary, and provide their customers with notice of these changes.4 The Federal Reserve routing symbols assigned to all other Federal Reserve branches and offices will remain the same at this time. The Board of Governors, however, intends to issue similar notices at least sixty days prior to the elimination of check operations at some other Reserve Bank offices, as described in the September 2004 Federal Register document. no additional burden will be imposed as a result of this rulemaking. Administrative Procedure Act I The Board has not followed the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553(b) relating to notice and public participation in connection with the adoption of this final rule. The revisions to the appendix are technical in nature, and the routing symbol revisions are required by the statutory and regulatory definitions of ‘‘check-processing region.’’ Because there is no substantive change on which to seek public input, the Board has determined that the section 553(b) notice and comment procedures are unnecessary. Paperwork Reduction Act In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506; 5 CFR part 1320 Appendix A.1), the Board has reviewed the final rule under authority delegated to the Board by the Office of Management and Budget. These technical amendments to appendix A of Regulation CC will delete the reference to the Salt Lake City branch office of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and reassign the routing symbols listed under that office to the Denver branch office of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. The depository institutions that are located in the affected check processing regions and that include the routing numbers in their disclosure statements would be required to notify customers of the resulting change in availability under § 229.18(e). However, because all paperwork collection procedures associated with Regulation CC already are in place, the Board anticipates that 4 Section 229.18(e) of Regulation CC requires that banks notify account holders who are consumers within 30 days after implementing a change that improves the availability of funds. PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 12 CFR Chapter II List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 229 Banks, Banking, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority and Issuance For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board is amending 12 CFR part 229 to read as follows: I PART 229—AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS AND COLLECTION OF CHECKS (REGULATION CC) 1. The authority citation for part 229 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 12 U.S.C. 4001–4010, 12 U.S.C. 5001–5018. 2. The Tenth and Twelfth Federal Reserve District routing symbol lists in appendix A are revised to read as follows: Appendix A to Part 229—Routing Number Guide to Next-Day Availability Checks and Local Checks * * * * * Tenth Federal Reserve District [Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City] Head Office 1010 1011 1012 1019 3010 3011 3012 3019 Denver Branch 1020 3020 1021 3021 1022 3022 1023 3023 1070 3070 1240 3240 1241 3241 1242 3242 1243 3243 Oklahoma City Branch 1030 3030 1031 3031 1039 3039 * * * * * Twelfth Federal Reserve District [Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco] Head Office 1210 1211 1212 1213 3210 3211 3212 3213 Los Angeles Branch 1220 3220 1221 3221 1222 3222 1223 3223 1224 3224 E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM 25APR1 21134 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 78 / Monday, April 25, 2005 / Rules and Regulations Portland Branch 1230 3230 1231 3231 1232 3232 1233 3233 Seattle Branch 1250 3250 1251 3251 1252 3252 * * * * * By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, acting through the Secretary of the Board under delegated authority, April 19, 2005. Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 05–8152 Filed 4–22–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. 2003–CE–57–AD; Amendment 39–14066; AD 2005–08–14] Airworthiness Directives; LET a.s. Model Blanik L–13 AC Sailplanes Discussion Was the Public Invited To Comment? What Events Have Caused This AD? We provided the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We received no comments on the proposal or on the determination of the cost to the public. The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), which is the airworthiness authority for the Czech Republic, recently notified FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on certain LET Model Blanik L–13 AC sailplanes. The CAA reports one case of cracks in the attachment of control levers on the control bridge (Drawing No. A71 210N) on a Model Blanik L–13 AC sailplane after 130 hours time-inservice (TIS) of aerobatics. The cracks are because of material fatigue. Failure of the control bridge for the sailplane could lead to loss of sailplane control. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: Has FAA Taken Any Action to This Point? The FAA adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all LET a.s. (formerly LET n.p.) (LET) Model Blanik L–13 AC sailplanes. This AD requires you to replace the original control bridge with the new strengthened control column mounting bridge. This AD is the result of a report of one case of cracks in the attachment of control levers on the control bridge. We are issuing this AD to correct cracks in the bedding of the front and rear control levers, which could result in failure of the control bridge for the sailplane. This failure could lead to loss of sailplane control. DATES: This AD becomes effective on June 6, 2005. As of June 6, 2005, the Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulation. ADDRESSES: You may get the service information identified in this AD from LET a.s., Kunovice 686 04, Czech Republic; telephone: +420 572 817 650; facsimile: +420 572 617 653. You may view the AD docket at FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional SUMMARY: 15:22 Apr 22, 2005 the NPRM should be changed to reflect the requirements in the new LET service bulletin. A supplemental NPRM proposal was published in the Federal Register on October 7, 2004 (69 FR 60106). The supplemental NPRM proposed to require you to replace the original control bridge with the new strengthened control column mounting bridge. What Is the Potential Impact if FAA Took No Action? RIN 2120–AA64 VerDate jul<14>2003 Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 2003–CE–57–AD, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Office hours are 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Davison, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–4130; facsimile: (816) 329–4090. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Jkt 205001 We issued a proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to all LET a.s. (formerly LET n.p.) (LET) Model Blanik L–13 AC sailplanes. This proposal was published in the Federal Register as a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on March 9, 2004 (69 FR 10939). The NPRM proposed to require you to repetitively inspect the bedding of the front and rear control levers for cracks, and, if any cracks are found, replace with parts found free of cracks. You would have to do the proposed actions following Letecke Zavody Mandatory Bulletin No.: L13/095a, dated October 18, 2001. Since issuance of the NPRM, LET has issued the new Letecke Zavody Mandatory Bulletin No.: L13AC/014a, dated July 17, 2003. This service bulletin removes the repetitive inspection, requires the replacement of parts, and changes the serial numbers affected. The CAA has not amended the Czech AD to reflect this service information. However, FAA has evaluated the new service information and determined that PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Comments Conclusion What Is FAA’s Final Determination on This Issue? We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed except for minor editorial corrections. We have determined that these minor corrections: —Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and —Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM. Changes to 14 CFR Part 39—Effect on the AD How Does the Revision to 14 CFR Part 39 Affect This AD? On July 10, 2002, the FAA published a new version of 14 CFR part 39 (67 FR 47997, July 22, 2002), which governs the FAA’s AD system. This regulation now includes material that relates to altered products, special flight permits, and alternative methods of compliance. This material previously was included in each individual AD. Since this material is included in 14 CFR part 39, we will not include it in future AD actions. Costs of Compliance How Many Sailplanes Does This AD Impact? We estimate that this AD affects 5 sailplanes in the U.S. registry. What Is the Cost Impact of This AD on Owners/Operators of the Affected Sailplanes? We estimate the following costs to do the replacement: E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM 25APR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 78 (Monday, April 25, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21132-21134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-8152]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

12 CFR Part 229

[Regulation CC; Docket No. R-1228]


Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board of Governors is amending appendix A of Regulation CC 
to delete the reference to the Salt Lake City branch office of the 
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and reassign the Federal Reserve 
routing symbols currently listed under that office to the Denver branch 
office of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. These amendments 
will ensure that the information in appendix A accurately describes the 
actual structure of check processing operations within the Federal 
Reserve System.

DATES: The final rule will become effective on June 18, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack K. Walton II, Assistant Director 
(202/452-2660), or Joseph P. Baressi, Senior Financial Services Analyst 
(202/452-3959), Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payment 
Systems; or Adrianne G. Threatt, Counsel (202/452-3554), Legal 
Division. For users of Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf (TDD) 
only, contact 202/263-4869.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulation CC establishes the maximum period 
a depositary bank may wait between receiving a deposit and making the 
deposited funds available for withdrawal.\1\ A depositary bank 
generally must provide faster availability for funds deposited by a 
local check than by a nonlocal check. A check drawn on a bank is 
considered local if it is payable by or at a bank located in the same 
Federal Reserve check processing region as the depositary bank. A check 
drawn on a nonbank is considered local if it is payable through a bank 
located in the same Federal Reserve check processing region as the 
depositary bank. Checks that do not meet the requirements for local 
checks are considered nonlocal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ For purposes of Regulation CC, the term ``bank'' refers to 
any depository institution, including commercial banks, savings 
institutions, and credit unions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Appendix A to Regulation CC contains a routing number guide that 
assists banks in identifying local and nonlocal banks and thereby 
determining the maximum permissible hold periods

[[Page 21133]]

for most deposited checks. The appendix includes a list of each Federal 
Reserve check processing office and the first four digits of the 
routing number, known as the Federal Reserve routing symbol, of each 
bank that is served by that office for check processing purposes. Banks 
whose Federal Reserve routing symbols are grouped under the same office 
are in the same check processing region and thus are local to one 
another.
    As explained in detail in the Board's final rule published in the 
Federal Register on September 28, 2004, the Federal Reserve Banks have 
decided to reduce further the number of locations at which they process 
checks.\2\ The amendments set forth in this notice are part of a series 
of appendix A amendments related to that decision, and the Board will 
issue separate notices for each phase of the restructuring.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See 69 FR 57837, September 28, 2004.
    \3\ In addition to the general advance notice of future 
amendments provided by the Board, and the Board's notices of final 
amendments, the Reserve Banks are striving to inform affected 
depository institutions of the exact date of each office transition 
at least 120 days in advance. The Reserve Banks' communications to 
affected depository institutions are available at https://
www.frbservices.org.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As part of the restructuring process, the Salt Lake City branch 
office of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco will cease 
processing checks on June 18, 2005, and banks with routing symbols 
currently assigned to that office for check processing purposes will be 
reassigned to the Denver branch office of the Federal Reserve Bank of 
Kansas City. As a result of these changes, some checks that are drawn 
on and deposited at banks located in the affected check processing 
regions and that currently are nonlocal checks will become local checks 
subject to faster availability schedules. Because the Denver branch 
office check processing region will serve banks located in more than 
one Federal Reserve District, banks located in the expanded Denver 
check processing region cannot determine that a check is nonlocal 
solely because the paying bank for that check is located in another 
Federal Reserve district.
    To assist banks in identifying local and nonlocal banks, the Board 
accordingly is amending the lists of routing symbols associated with 
the Federal Reserve Banks of San Francisco and Kansas City to conform 
to the transfer of operations from the San Francisco Reserve Bank's 
Salt Lake City branch office to the Kansas City Reserve Bank's Denver 
branch office. To coincide with the effective date of the underlying 
check processing changes, the amendments are effective June 18, 2005. 
The Board is providing advance notice of these amendments to give 
affected banks ample time to make any needed processing changes. The 
advance notice also will enable affected banks to amend their 
availability schedules and related disclosures, if necessary, and 
provide their customers with notice of these changes.\4\ The Federal 
Reserve routing symbols assigned to all other Federal Reserve branches 
and offices will remain the same at this time. The Board of Governors, 
however, intends to issue similar notices at least sixty days prior to 
the elimination of check operations at some other Reserve Bank offices, 
as described in the September 2004 Federal Register document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Section 229.18(e) of Regulation CC requires that banks 
notify account holders who are consumers within 30 days after 
implementing a change that improves the availability of funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Administrative Procedure Act

    The Board has not followed the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553(b) 
relating to notice and public participation in connection with the 
adoption of this final rule. The revisions to the appendix are 
technical in nature, and the routing symbol revisions are required by 
the statutory and regulatory definitions of ``check-processing 
region.'' Because there is no substantive change on which to seek 
public input, the Board has determined that the section 553(b) notice 
and comment procedures are unnecessary.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
3506; 5 CFR part 1320 Appendix A.1), the Board has reviewed the final 
rule under authority delegated to the Board by the Office of Management 
and Budget. These technical amendments to appendix A of Regulation CC 
will delete the reference to the Salt Lake City branch office of the 
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and reassign the routing symbols 
listed under that office to the Denver branch office of the Federal 
Reserve Bank of Kansas City. The depository institutions that are 
located in the affected check processing regions and that include the 
routing numbers in their disclosure statements would be required to 
notify customers of the resulting change in availability under Sec.  
229.18(e). However, because all paperwork collection procedures 
associated with Regulation CC already are in place, the Board 
anticipates that no additional burden will be imposed as a result of 
this rulemaking.

12 CFR Chapter II

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 229

    Banks, Banking, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Authority and Issuance

0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board is amending 12 CFR 
part 229 to read as follows:

PART 229--AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS AND COLLECTION OF CHECKS 
(REGULATION CC)

0
1. The authority citation for part 229 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 12 U.S.C. 4001-4010, 12 U.S.C. 5001-5018.


0
2. The Tenth and Twelfth Federal Reserve District routing symbol lists 
in appendix A are revised to read as follows:

Appendix A to Part 229--Routing Number Guide to Next-Day Availability 
Checks and Local Checks

* * * * *

Tenth Federal Reserve District

[Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City]

Head Office

 1010 3010
 1011 3011
 1012 3012
 1019 3019

Denver Branch

 1020 3020
 1021 3021
 1022 3022
 1023 3023
 1070 3070
 1240 3240
 1241 3241
 1242 3242
 1243 3243

Oklahoma City Branch

 1030 3030
 1031 3031
 1039 3039
* * * * *

Twelfth Federal Reserve District

[Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco]

Head Office

 1210 3210
 1211 3211
 1212 3212
 1213 3213

Los Angeles Branch

 1220 3220
 1221 3221
 1222 3222
 1223 3223
 1224 3224

[[Page 21134]]

Portland Branch

 1230 3230
 1231 3231
 1232 3232
 1233 3233

Seattle Branch

 1250 3250
 1251 3251
 1252 3252
* * * * *

    By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System, acting through the Secretary of the Board under delegated 
authority, April 19, 2005.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-8152 Filed 4-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.