PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings, 20888-20890 [E5-1902]

Download as PDF 20888 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 77 / Friday, April 22, 2005 / Notices 20. The Commission has long established that compliance filings must be limited to the specific directives ordered by the Commission. The purpose of a compliance filing is to make the directed changes and the Commission’s focus in reviewing them is whether they comply with the Commission’s previously-stated directives.16 In this instance, FirstEnergy Companies identified their December 31, 2003 Filing as a triennial updated market power analysis and stated that they had submitted this analysis pursuant to the various orders granting FirstEnergy Companies marketbased rate authorization; however, they included with the updated market power analysis changes to their marketbased rate tariffs not directed by the underlying orders. Therefore, the Commission will reject these proposed changes to the FirstEnergy Companies’ market-based rate tariffs submitted with the December 31, 2003 Updated Market Power Analysis Filing as outside the scope of that compliance filing. We reaffirm that compliance filings must only provide the changes directed by the Commission. Accordingly, marketbased rate tariff revisions that are beyond the scope of a Commissiondirected compliance filing will be deemed automatically rejected at the time of filing. The Commission orders: (A) FirstEnergy Companies’ updated generation market power analysis is hereby accepted for filing, subject to Commission acceptance of the compliance filing directed in Ordering Paragraph (B), as discussed in the body of this order. (B) FirstEnergy Companies are directed, within 30 days of the date of issuance of this order, to submit a compliance filing to address whether FirstEnergy Companies satisfy the Commission’s concerns with regard to affiliate abuse, as discussed in the body of this order. (C) FirstEnergy Companies’ next updated market power analysis is due within three years of the date of this order. (D) FirstEnergy Companies’ revised tariff sheets (e.g. revising the code of conduct and affiliate sales provision), with the exception of those discussed in Ordering Paragraph (F) below, are 16 Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 109 FERC ¶ 61,336 at P5 (2004); Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., 99 FERC ¶ 61,302 at 62,264 (2002); ISO New England, Inc., 91 FERC ¶ 61,016 at 61,060 (2000); Sierra Pacific Power Company, 80 FERC ¶ 61,376 at 62,271 (1997); Delmarva Power & Light Company, 63 FERC ¶ 61,321 at 63,160 (1993). VerDate jul<14>2003 15:27 Apr 21, 2005 Jkt 205001 rejected, as discussed in the body of this order. (E) FirstEnergy Companies are directed, within 30 days of the date of issuance of this order, to revise their market-based rate tariffs to include the change in status reporting requirement adopted in Order No. 652. (F) FirstEnergy Companies’ revised tariff sheet(s) incorporating the Commission’s market behavior rules are accepted for filing, effective December 17, 2003. (G) FirstEnergy Companies’ June, 2004, request for rehearing is dismissed as moot. (H) The Secretary is hereby directed to publish a copy of this order in the Federal Register. By the Commission. Linda Mitry, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–1918 Filed 4–21–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. EL05–93–000] PJM Industrial Customer Coalition, Complainant v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and American Electric Power Service Corporation, Respondents; Notice of Complaint April 15, 2005. Take notice that on April 15, 2005, the PJM Industrial Customer Coalition filed a formal complaint against PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and American Electric Power Service Corporation pursuant to sections 206 and 306 of the Federal Power Act and Rule 206 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, alleging that Respondents’ refusal to allow members of the PJM Industrial Customer Coalition, located in American Electric Power Service Corporation’s service territory, to participate in PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.’s emergency and economic load response programs contravenes Respondents’ obligations under the PJM open access transmission tariff. The PJM Industrial Customer Coalition certifies that copies of the complaint were served on the contacts for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and American Electric Power Service Corporation as listed on the Commission’s list of corporate officials. Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent’s answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. The Respondent’s answer, motions to intervene, and protest must be served on the Complainants. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 5, 2005. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–1898 Filed 4–21–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. EL05–62–001, et al.] PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings April 13, 2005. The following filings have been made with the Commission. The filings are listed in ascending order within each docket classification. 1. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. [Docket No. EL05–62–001] Take notice that on March 28, 2005, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission’s order issued February 25, E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM 22APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 77 / Friday, April 22, 2005 / Notices 2005 in Docket No. ER04–1003–002, et al., 110 FERC ¶ 61,187 (2005). Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 22, 2005. 2. California Independent System Operator Corporation [Docket Nos. ER03–218–006, ER03–219–006, EC03–81–003] Take notice that on April 6, 2005, the California Independent System Operator Corporation (ISO) submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission’s order issued March 22, 2005 in Docket No. ER03–218–005, et al., 110 FERC ¶ 61,297 (2005). The ISO states that the filing has been served on all parties on the official service list in these proceedings. In addition, the ISO states that the filing has been posted on the ISO home page. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005. 3. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.; Public Utilities with Grandfathered Agreements in the Midwest ISO Region [Docket Nos. ER04–691–034, EL04–104–032] Take notice that on April 6, 2005, the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted revisions to the Midwest ISO’s Open Access Transmission and Energy Markets Tariff in compliance with certain requirements in the Commission’s March 16, 2005 Order in Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., et al., 110 FERC ¶ 61,289 (2005). The Midwest ISO has requested March 24, 2005 and April 1, 2005 effective dates for the tariff sheets submitted as part of this filing. The Midwest ISO states that it has electronically served a copy of this filing, with attachments, upon all Midwest ISO Members, Member representatives of Transmission Owners and Non-Transmission Owners, the Midwest ISO Advisory Committee participants, as well as all state commissions within the region. In addition, Midwest ISO states that the filing has been electronically posted on the Midwest ISO’s Web site at https:// www.midwestiso.org under the heading ‘‘Filings to FERC’’ for other interested parties in this matter. Further, the Midwest ISO will provide hard copies to any interested parties upon request. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005. 4. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. [Docket No. ER05–283–003] Take notice that on April 6, 2005, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JPMCB) submitted a compliance filing pursuant VerDate jul<14>2003 15:27 Apr 21, 2005 Jkt 205001 20889 to the Commission’s letter order issued March 18, 2005 in JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 110 FERC ¶ 61,292 (2005). Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005. Business Line, the California Public Utilities Commission, and the California Electricity Oversight Board. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005. 5. American Transmission Company LLC 8. California Independent System Operator Corporation [Docket Nos. ER05–645–001, ER05–646–001] Take notice that on April 7, 2005, American Transmission Company, LLC (ATCLLC) filed requests to amend its February 24, 2005 filings submitting distribution-transmission interconnection agreements between ATCLLC and Black Earth Electric Utilities and Hartford Electric originally submitted in Docket Nos. ER05–645– 000 and ER05–646–000, respectively. ATCLLC requests that the distributiontransmission interconnection agreements be accepted, subject to the outcome of the Commission’s decision on the rehearing request filed by ATCLLC in Docket No. ER05–237–001, et al. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 22, 2005. 6. Wisconsin Electric Power Company [Docket No. ER05–760–001] Take notice that on April 6, 2005, Wisconsin Electric Power Company (Wisconsin Electric) tendered for filing an errata to its March 31, 2005 filing submitting Amendment No. 2 to the Joint Operating Agreement between Wisconsin Electric and Edison Sault Electric Company. Wisconsin Electric requests an effective date of April 1, 2005. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005. 7. California Independent System Operator Corporation [Docket No. ER05–784–000] Take notice that on April 6, 2005, the California Independent System Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered for filing a Dynamic Scheduling Host Control Area Operating Agreement (DSHCAOA) between the ISO and British Columbia Transmission Corporation (BCTC). ISO states that the purpose of the DSHCAOA is to establish the framework of operating requirements for the dynamic scheduling functionality and to require the host control area responsible for the functionality to comply with the applicable provisions of the ISO tariff, including the ISO dynamic scheduling protocol. The ISO requests an effective date of April 8, 2005. The ISO states that the non-privileged elements of the filing have been served on BCTC, Powerex Corp., Bonneville Power Administration Transmission PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [Docket No. ER05–785–000] Take notice that on April 6, 2005, the California Independent System Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered for filing a letter agreement between the ISO and Bonneville Power Administration Transmission Business Line (BPAT). ISO states that the purpose of the letter agreement is to establish the framework of operating requirements for BPAT’s role as an intermediary control area for dynamic scheduling functionality to the ISO control area and to require the ISO and BPAT to comply with the applicable provisions of their respective protocols, standards, and practices regarding dynamic scheduling. The ISO requests an effective date of April 8, 2005. The ISO states that the filing has been served on BPTA, Powerex Corp., British Columbia Transmission Corporation, the California Public Utilities Commission, and the California Electricity Oversight Board. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005. 9. California Independent System Operator Corporation [Docket No. ER05–786–000] Take notice that on April 6, 2005, the California Independent System Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered for filing a Dynamic Scheduling Agreement for Scheduling Coordinators (DSA) between the ISO and Powerex Corp. (Powerex). ISO states that the purpose of the DSA is to establish the framework of operating and scheduling requirements for the dynamic scheduling functionality and to require the Scheduling Coordinator responsible for operation of the functionality to comply with the applicable provisions of the ISO tariff, including the ISO dynamic scheduling protocol. The ISO requests an effective date of April 8, 2005. The ISO states that the filing has been served on Powerex, Bonneville Power Administration Transmission Business Line, British Columbia Transmission Corporation, the California Public Utilities Commission, and the California Electricity Oversight Board. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005. E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM 22APN1 20890 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 77 / Friday, April 22, 2005 / Notices 10. Gulf States Wholesale Equity Partners II, LP [Docket No. ER05–787–000] Take notice that on April 6, 2005, Gulf States Wholesale Equity Partners II, LP filed a petition for approval of its Rate Schedule FERC No. 1; the granting of certain blanket approvals, including the authority to sell electricity at market-based rates; and the waiver of certain Commission regulations. Gulf States Wholesale Equity Partners II, LP states that it intends to engage in wholesale electric power and energy purchases and sales as a marketer and is not in the business of generating or transmitting electric power. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005. 11. American Electric Power Service Corporation [Docket No. ER05–788–000] Take notice that on April 6, 2005, the American Electric Power Service Corporation (AEP) tendered for filing a Notice of Termination of an executed Interconnection and Operation Agreement between Indiana Michigan Power Company and Berrien Energy Center, LLC, designated as Service Agreement No. 522 under American Electric Power Operating Companies’ Open Access Transmission Tariff. AEP requests an effective date of April 4, 2005. AEP states that a copy of the filing was served on Berrien Energy Center, LLC, Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, and the Michigan Public Service Commission. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005. 12. Indeck Pepperell Power Associates, Inc. [Docket No. ER05–789–000] Take notice that on April 6, 2005, Black Hills Corporation, on behalf of its subsidiary Black Hills Pepperell Power Associates, LLC, formerly known as Indeck Pepperell Power Associates, Inc. (Pepperell) filed a notice of cancellation of Pepperell’s market-based rate wholesale power sales tariff and all service agreements under the tariff. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005. 13. El Segundo Power, LLC [Docket No. ER05–791–000] Take notice that on April 6, 2005, El Segundo Power, LLC (El Segundo) tendered for filing an amendment to Sheet Nos. 127 and 129 of its Rate Schedule FERC No. 2, Reliability MustRun Service Agreement between El Segundo and the California Independent VerDate jul<14>2003 15:27 Apr 21, 2005 Jkt 205001 System Operator Corporation (CAISO). El Segundo requests an effective date of January 1, 2005 for Sheet No. 127 and May 1, 2005 for Sheet No. 129. El Segundo states that copies of the filing were served on the CAISO, Southern Edison Company, the California Electricity Oversight Board and the California Public Utilities Commission. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005. Standard Paragraph Linda Mitry, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–1902 Filed 4–21–05; 8:45 am] PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. EL05–60–000, et al.] PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings April 15, 2005. The following filings have been made with the Commission. The filings are listed in ascending order within each docket classification. 1. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant and all parties to this proceeding. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY [Docket No. EL05–60–000] Take notice that on March 28, 2005, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., submitted its response regarding the existing restudy provisions of the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff pursuant to the Commission’s February 10, 2005 Order in PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 110 FERC ¶ 61,099 (2005). Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 6, 2005. 2. LG&E Energy Marketing Inc., Louisville Gas & Electric Company & Kentucky Utilities Company, WKE Station Two Inc., Western Kentucky Energy Corporation [Docket No. ER94–1188–035, ER98–4540– 004, ER99–1623–004, ER98–1278–010, ER98–1279–006] Take notice that, on April 8, 2005 and April 13, 2005, LG&E Energy Marketing Inc., Louisville Gas & Electric Company, Kentucky Utilities Company, WKE Station Two Inc., and Western Kentucky Energy Corporation (collectively, the LG&E Parties) submitted responses to the Commission’s March 8, 2005 deficiency letter seeking additional information regarding LG&E Parties’ November 19, 2004 filing in these dockets. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 25, 2005. 3. Infinite Energy, Inc. [Docket No. ER97–3923–002] Take notice that on April 7, 2005, Infinite Energy, Inc. (Infinite) submitted for filing its triennial updated market analysis and revisions to its FERC Rate Schedule No. 1 to incorporate the Market Behavior Rules set forth in the Commission’s orders in Investigation of Terms and Conditions of Public Utility Market-Based Rate Authorizations, 105 FERC ¶ 61,218 (92003, order on reh’g, 107 FERC ¶ 61,175 (2004). Infinite states that the tariff has also been revised to reflect the requirements of Commission Order Nos. 614 and 652. Infinite requests an effective date of May 1, 2005. E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM 22APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 77 (Friday, April 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20888-20890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL05-62-001, et al.]


PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate 
Filings

April 13, 2005.
    The following filings have been made with the Commission. The 
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket 
classification.

1. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

[Docket No. EL05-62-001]

    Take notice that on March 28, 2005, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. 
submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission's order issued 
February 25,

[[Page 20889]]

2005 in Docket No. ER04-1003-002, et al., 110 FERC ] 61,187 (2005).
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 22, 2005.

2. California Independent System Operator Corporation

[Docket Nos. ER03-218-006, ER03-219-006, EC03-81-003]

    Take notice that on April 6, 2005, the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation (ISO) submitted a compliance filing 
pursuant to the Commission's order issued March 22, 2005 in Docket No. 
ER03-218-005, et al., 110 FERC ] 61,297 (2005).
    The ISO states that the filing has been served on all parties on 
the official service list in these proceedings. In addition, the ISO 
states that the filing has been posted on the ISO home page.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005.

3. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.; Public 
Utilities with Grandfathered Agreements in the Midwest ISO Region

[Docket Nos. ER04-691-034, EL04-104-032]

    Take notice that on April 6, 2005, the Midwest Independent 
Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted revisions to 
the Midwest ISO's Open Access Transmission and Energy Markets Tariff in 
compliance with certain requirements in the Commission's March 16, 2005 
Order in Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., et 
al., 110 FERC ] 61,289 (2005). The Midwest ISO has requested March 24, 
2005 and April 1, 2005 effective dates for the tariff sheets submitted 
as part of this filing.
    The Midwest ISO states that it has electronically served a copy of 
this filing, with attachments, upon all Midwest ISO Members, Member 
representatives of Transmission Owners and Non-Transmission Owners, the 
Midwest ISO Advisory Committee participants, as well as all state 
commissions within the region. In addition, Midwest ISO states that the 
filing has been electronically posted on the Midwest ISO's Web site at 
https://www.midwestiso.org under the heading ``Filings to FERC'' for 
other interested parties in this matter. Further, the Midwest ISO will 
provide hard copies to any interested parties upon request.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005.

4. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

[Docket No. ER05-283-003]

    Take notice that on April 6, 2005, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 
(JPMCB) submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission's 
letter order issued March 18, 2005 in JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 110 
FERC ] 61,292 (2005).
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005.

5. American Transmission Company LLC

[Docket Nos. ER05-645-001, ER05-646-001]

    Take notice that on April 7, 2005, American Transmission Company, 
LLC (ATCLLC) filed requests to amend its February 24, 2005 filings 
submitting distribution-transmission interconnection agreements between 
ATCLLC and Black Earth Electric Utilities and Hartford Electric 
originally submitted in Docket Nos. ER05-645-000 and ER05-646-000, 
respectively. ATCLLC requests that the distribution-transmission 
interconnection agreements be accepted, subject to the outcome of the 
Commission's decision on the rehearing request filed by ATCLLC in 
Docket No. ER05-237-001, et al.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 22, 2005.

6. Wisconsin Electric Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-760-001]

    Take notice that on April 6, 2005, Wisconsin Electric Power Company 
(Wisconsin Electric) tendered for filing an errata to its March 31, 
2005 filing submitting Amendment No. 2 to the Joint Operating Agreement 
between Wisconsin Electric and Edison Sault Electric Company. Wisconsin 
Electric requests an effective date of April 1, 2005.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005.

7. California Independent System Operator Corporation

[Docket No. ER05-784-000]

    Take notice that on April 6, 2005, the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered for filing a Dynamic 
Scheduling Host Control Area Operating Agreement (DSHCAOA) between the 
ISO and British Columbia Transmission Corporation (BCTC). ISO states 
that the purpose of the DSHCAOA is to establish the framework of 
operating requirements for the dynamic scheduling functionality and to 
require the host control area responsible for the functionality to 
comply with the applicable provisions of the ISO tariff, including the 
ISO dynamic scheduling protocol. The ISO requests an effective date of 
April 8, 2005.
    The ISO states that the non-privileged elements of the filing have 
been served on BCTC, Powerex Corp., Bonneville Power Administration 
Transmission Business Line, the California Public Utilities Commission, 
and the California Electricity Oversight Board.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005.

8. California Independent System Operator Corporation

[Docket No. ER05-785-000]

    Take notice that on April 6, 2005, the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered for filing a letter 
agreement between the ISO and Bonneville Power Administration 
Transmission Business Line (BPAT). ISO states that the purpose of the 
letter agreement is to establish the framework of operating 
requirements for BPAT's role as an intermediary control area for 
dynamic scheduling functionality to the ISO control area and to require 
the ISO and BPAT to comply with the applicable provisions of their 
respective protocols, standards, and practices regarding dynamic 
scheduling. The ISO requests an effective date of April 8, 2005.
    The ISO states that the filing has been served on BPTA, Powerex 
Corp., British Columbia Transmission Corporation, the California Public 
Utilities Commission, and the California Electricity Oversight Board.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005.

9. California Independent System Operator Corporation

[Docket No. ER05-786-000]

    Take notice that on April 6, 2005, the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered for filing a Dynamic 
Scheduling Agreement for Scheduling Coordinators (DSA) between the ISO 
and Powerex Corp. (Powerex). ISO states that the purpose of the DSA is 
to establish the framework of operating and scheduling requirements for 
the dynamic scheduling functionality and to require the Scheduling 
Coordinator responsible for operation of the functionality to comply 
with the applicable provisions of the ISO tariff, including the ISO 
dynamic scheduling protocol. The ISO requests an effective date of 
April 8, 2005.
    The ISO states that the filing has been served on Powerex, 
Bonneville Power Administration Transmission Business Line, British 
Columbia Transmission Corporation, the California Public Utilities 
Commission, and the California Electricity Oversight Board.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005.

[[Page 20890]]

10. Gulf States Wholesale Equity Partners II, LP

[Docket No. ER05-787-000]

    Take notice that on April 6, 2005, Gulf States Wholesale Equity 
Partners II, LP filed a petition for approval of its Rate Schedule FERC 
No. 1; the granting of certain blanket approvals, including the 
authority to sell electricity at market-based rates; and the waiver of 
certain Commission regulations. Gulf States Wholesale Equity Partners 
II, LP states that it intends to engage in wholesale electric power and 
energy purchases and sales as a marketer and is not in the business of 
generating or transmitting electric power.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005.

11. American Electric Power Service Corporation

[Docket No. ER05-788-000]

    Take notice that on April 6, 2005, the American Electric Power 
Service Corporation (AEP) tendered for filing a Notice of Termination 
of an executed Interconnection and Operation Agreement between Indiana 
Michigan Power Company and Berrien Energy Center, LLC, designated as 
Service Agreement No. 522 under American Electric Power Operating 
Companies' Open Access Transmission Tariff. AEP requests an effective 
date of April 4, 2005.
    AEP states that a copy of the filing was served on Berrien Energy 
Center, LLC, Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, and the Michigan 
Public Service Commission.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005.

12. Indeck Pepperell Power Associates, Inc.

[Docket No. ER05-789-000]

    Take notice that on April 6, 2005, Black Hills Corporation, on 
behalf of its subsidiary Black Hills Pepperell Power Associates, LLC, 
formerly known as Indeck Pepperell Power Associates, Inc. (Pepperell) 
filed a notice of cancellation of Pepperell's market-based rate 
wholesale power sales tariff and all service agreements under the 
tariff.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005.

13. El Segundo Power, LLC

[Docket No. ER05-791-000]

    Take notice that on April 6, 2005, El Segundo Power, LLC (El 
Segundo) tendered for filing an amendment to Sheet Nos. 127 and 129 of 
its Rate Schedule FERC No. 2, Reliability Must-Run Service Agreement 
between El Segundo and the California Independent System Operator 
Corporation (CAISO). El Segundo requests an effective date of January 
1, 2005 for Sheet No. 127 and May 1, 2005 for Sheet No. 129.
    El Segundo states that copies of the filing were served on the 
CAISO, Southern Edison Company, the California Electricity Oversight 
Board and the California Public Utilities Commission.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2005.

Standard Paragraph

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all parties to this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at https://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Linda Mitry,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-1902 Filed 4-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.