PJM Industrial Customer Coalition, Complainant v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and American Electric Power Service Corporation, Respondents; Notice of Complaint, 20888 [E5-1898]
Download as PDF
20888
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 77 / Friday, April 22, 2005 / Notices
20. The Commission has long
established that compliance filings must
be limited to the specific directives
ordered by the Commission. The
purpose of a compliance filing is to
make the directed changes and the
Commission’s focus in reviewing them
is whether they comply with the
Commission’s previously-stated
directives.16 In this instance,
FirstEnergy Companies identified their
December 31, 2003 Filing as a triennial
updated market power analysis and
stated that they had submitted this
analysis pursuant to the various orders
granting FirstEnergy Companies marketbased rate authorization; however, they
included with the updated market
power analysis changes to their marketbased rate tariffs not directed by the
underlying orders. Therefore, the
Commission will reject these proposed
changes to the FirstEnergy Companies’
market-based rate tariffs submitted with
the December 31, 2003 Updated Market
Power Analysis Filing as outside the
scope of that compliance filing. We
reaffirm that compliance filings must
only provide the changes directed by
the Commission. Accordingly, marketbased rate tariff revisions that are
beyond the scope of a Commissiondirected compliance filing will be
deemed automatically rejected at the
time of filing.
The Commission orders:
(A) FirstEnergy Companies’ updated
generation market power analysis is
hereby accepted for filing, subject to
Commission acceptance of the
compliance filing directed in Ordering
Paragraph (B), as discussed in the body
of this order.
(B) FirstEnergy Companies are
directed, within 30 days of the date of
issuance of this order, to submit a
compliance filing to address whether
FirstEnergy Companies satisfy the
Commission’s concerns with regard to
affiliate abuse, as discussed in the body
of this order.
(C) FirstEnergy Companies’ next
updated market power analysis is due
within three years of the date of this
order.
(D) FirstEnergy Companies’ revised
tariff sheets (e.g. revising the code of
conduct and affiliate sales provision),
with the exception of those discussed in
Ordering Paragraph (F) below, are
16 Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 109 FERC
¶ 61,336 at P5 (2004); Midwest Independent
Transmission System Operator, Inc., 99 FERC
¶ 61,302 at 62,264 (2002); ISO New England, Inc.,
91 FERC ¶ 61,016 at 61,060 (2000); Sierra Pacific
Power Company, 80 FERC ¶ 61,376 at 62,271
(1997); Delmarva Power & Light Company, 63 FERC
¶ 61,321 at 63,160 (1993).
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:27 Apr 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
rejected, as discussed in the body of this
order.
(E) FirstEnergy Companies are
directed, within 30 days of the date of
issuance of this order, to revise their
market-based rate tariffs to include the
change in status reporting requirement
adopted in Order No. 652.
(F) FirstEnergy Companies’ revised
tariff sheet(s) incorporating the
Commission’s market behavior rules are
accepted for filing, effective December
17, 2003.
(G) FirstEnergy Companies’ June,
2004, request for rehearing is dismissed
as moot.
(H) The Secretary is hereby directed
to publish a copy of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Linda Mitry,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–1918 Filed 4–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL05–93–000]
PJM Industrial Customer Coalition,
Complainant v. PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C. and American Electric Power
Service Corporation, Respondents;
Notice of Complaint
April 15, 2005.
Take notice that on April 15, 2005,
the PJM Industrial Customer Coalition
filed a formal complaint against PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C. and American
Electric Power Service Corporation
pursuant to sections 206 and 306 of the
Federal Power Act and Rule 206 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, alleging that Respondents’
refusal to allow members of the PJM
Industrial Customer Coalition, located
in American Electric Power Service
Corporation’s service territory, to
participate in PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.’s emergency and economic load
response programs contravenes
Respondents’ obligations under the PJM
open access transmission tariff.
The PJM Industrial Customer
Coalition certifies that copies of the
complaint were served on the contacts
for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and
American Electric Power Service
Corporation as listed on the
Commission’s list of corporate officials.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Protests will be considered by
the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. The Respondent’s answer
and all interventions, or protests must
be filed on or before the comment date.
The Respondent’s answer, motions to
intervene, and protest must be served on
the Complainants.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on
May 5, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–1898 Filed 4–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL05–62–001, et al.]
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., et al.;
Electric Rate and Corporate Filings
April 13, 2005.
The following filings have been made
with the Commission. The filings are
listed in ascending order within each
docket classification.
1. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
[Docket No. EL05–62–001]
Take notice that on March 28, 2005,
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submitted a
compliance filing pursuant to the
Commission’s order issued February 25,
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 77 (Friday, April 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 20888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1898]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EL05-93-000]
PJM Industrial Customer Coalition, Complainant v. PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C. and American Electric Power Service
Corporation, Respondents; Notice of Complaint
April 15, 2005.
Take notice that on April 15, 2005, the PJM Industrial Customer
Coalition filed a formal complaint against PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
and American Electric Power Service Corporation pursuant to sections
206 and 306 of the Federal Power Act and Rule 206 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure, alleging that Respondents' refusal to
allow members of the PJM Industrial Customer Coalition, located in
American Electric Power Service Corporation's service territory, to
participate in PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.'s emergency and economic
load response programs contravenes Respondents' obligations under the
PJM open access transmission tariff.
The PJM Industrial Customer Coalition certifies that copies of the
complaint were served on the contacts for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
and American Electric Power Service Corporation as listed on the
Commission's list of corporate officials.
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protest must be served on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at https://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on May 5, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-1898 Filed 4-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P