Sprout Safety Public Meeting, 20852-20854 [05-8103]
Download as PDF
20852
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 77 / Friday, April 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
proposed by the Commission.’’ 36 The
Commission also continues to believe
that ‘‘such a system would present
greater administrative, technical, and
legal costs and complexities than the
Commission’s current proposal which
does not require any proof or
verification of that status.’’ 37
Another alternative would be
reducing the current number of free area
codes, but this approach might, among
other things, require additional
expenditures to process and service an
increased number of paid subscriptions.
In any event, reducing the number of
free area codes may increase, rather than
decrease, compliance costs for small
businesses, if they had to pay for certain
area codes that they can currently access
for free.
Accordingly, the Commission believes
its current proposal balances the
interests of reducing the burden for
small businesses to the greatest extent
possible, while achieving the goal of
covering the necessary costs to
implement and enforce the Amended
TSR.
Despite these conclusions, the
Commission welcomes comment on any
significant alternatives that would
further minimize the impact on small
entities, consistent with the objectives
of the Telemarketing Act, the 2005
Appropriations Act, and the
Implementation Act.
List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 310
Telemarketing, Trade practices.
VII. Proposed Rule
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in
the preamble, the Federal Trade
Commission proposes to amend part
310 of title 16 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 310—TELEMARKETING SALES
RULE
1. The authority citation for part 310
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 6101–6108.
§ 310.8 Fee for access to the National Do
Not Call Registry.
*
*
*
*
(c) The annual fee, which must be
paid by any person prior to obtaining
access to the National Do Not Call
Registry, is $56 per area code of data
accessed, up to a maximum of $15,400;
provided, however, that there shall be
no charge for the first five area codes of
36 See
68 FR at 16,243 n.53.
37 Id.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Apr 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
ACTION:
of sprouts. In October 2004, FDA
released a produce safety action plan
entitled ‘‘Produce Safety from
Production to Consumption: 2004
Action Plan to Minimize Foodborne
Illness Associated with Fresh Produce
Consumption’’ (Produce Action Plan).
One item in the Produce Action Plan is
to initiate rulemaking to minimize
foodborne illness associated with the
consumption of sprouted seeds.
However, because of the complexities of
the issues and the uncertainty about
what the current science could support,
FDA believes that it would be of value
to hold a public meeting to gather
information relevant to a possible
regulation. We request that those who
speak at the meeting, or otherwise
provide FDA with their comments,
focus on the questions relating to the
microbial safety of seeds destined for
sprouting and sprouted seeds set out in
section II of this document.
DATES: The public meeting will be held
in College Park, MD, on Tuesday, May
17, 2005, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. We
request that everyone planning to attend
the meeting register prior to the
meeting. For security reasons and due to
space limitations, we recommend that
you register at least 5 business days
before the meeting. You may register via
the Internet and also by fax until close
of business 5 days before the meeting,
provided that space is available (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). In
addition to participating in the public
meeting, you may submit written or
electronic comments until July 18, 2005.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
held at the Harvey W. Wiley Federal
Bldg., Food and Drug Administration,
Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy.,
College Park, MD 20740–3835.
Submit written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/
ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy L. Green, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–306), Food
and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint
Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 301–
436–2025, FAX: 301–436–2651, or email: amy.green@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing a
public meeting to elicit information on
the current science related to foodborne
illness associated with the consumption
I. Background
Since 1996, FDA has responded to 27
outbreaks of foodborne illness in the
United States for which raw or lightly
cooked sprouts were the confirmed or
suspected vehicle for the illness. During
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–8044 Filed 4–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
2. Revise § 310.8(c) and (d) to read as
follows:
*
data accessed by any person, and
provided further, that there shall be no
charge to any person engaging in or
causing others to engage in outbound
telephone calls to consumers and who
is accessing the National Do Not Call
Registry without being required under
this Rule, 47 CFR 64.1200, or any other
federal law. Any person accessing the
National Do Not Call Registry may not
participate in any arrangement to share
the cost of accessing the registry,
including any arrangement with any
telemarketer or service provider to
divide the costs to access the registry
among various clients of that
telemarketer or service provider.
(d) After a person, either directly or
through another person, pays the fees
set forth in § 310.8(c), the person will be
provided a unique account number
which will allow that person to access
the registry data for the selected area
codes at any time for twelve months
following the first day of the month in
which the person paid the fee (‘‘the
annual period’’). To obtain access to
additional area codes of data during the
first six months of the annual period,
the person must first pay $56 for each
additional area code of data not initially
selected. To obtain access to additional
area codes of data during the second six
months of the annual period, the person
must first pay $28 for each additional
area code of data not initially selected.
The payment of the additional fee will
permit the person to access the
additional area codes of data for the
remainder of the annual period.
*
*
*
*
*
21 CFR Chapter I
[Docket No. 2005N–0147]
Sprout Safety Public Meeting
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice of public meeting;
request for comments.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\22APP1.SGM
22APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 77 / Friday, April 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
this 9-year period, sprouts accounted for
40 percent of all foodborne illness
outbreaks associated with fresh produce
and approximately 20 percent of the
reported illnesses. The 27 outbreaks
accounted for an estimated 1,636
reported cases of illness. Although the
sprouts associated with these outbreaks
have been primarily alfalfa, clover, or
mung bean sprouts, FDA is concerned
about the foodborne illness risk
associated with all types of raw and
lightly cooked sprouts. Thus, the agency
has issued several advisories that warn
consumers of the risks associated with
consumption of raw or lightly cooked
sprouts. The sprouts involved with the
outbreaks have been generally of U.S.
origin while the seeds from which the
sprouts have been produced have been
primarily of non-U.S. origin. To date,
the causative agents have been
Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157.
Sprouts present a special food safety
challenge because the conditions that
promote sprouting of the seed (e.g.,
temperature, humidity, available
nutrients) also promote the growth of
pathogens if pathogens are present. Seed
appears to be the source of
contamination in most of the foodborne
illness outbreaks associated with sprout
consumption. However, insanitary
conditions at the sprouting facility
appear to have exacerbated any seed
contamination problems.
In October 1999, FDA issued a
guidance entitled ‘‘Guidance for
Industry: Reducing Microbial Food
Safety Hazards for Sprouted Seeds.’’
This guidance recommends preventive
controls to assist all parties involved in
the production of sprouts (seed
producers, seed conditioners and
distributors, and sprout producers) to
reduce the risk of sprouts serving as a
vehicle for foodborne illness. The
guidance is available at https://
vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/sprougd1.html.
Specific recommendations in this
guidance include development and
implementation of good agricultural
practices and good manufacturing
practices in the production and
handling of seeds and sprouts, seed
disinfection treatments, and microbial
testing of spent irrigation water before
the sprouts enter the food supply. At the
same time, FDA issued a second
guidance entitled ‘‘Guidance for
Industry: Sampling and Microbial
Testing of Spent Irrigation Water during
Sprout Production,’’ which contains
recommendations to assist sprout
producers in testing spent irrigation
water for pathogens before sprout
products enter the food supply. This
second guidance is available at https://
vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/sprougd2.html.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Apr 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
FDA also served as a technical
consultant to the California Department
of Health Services, who, in cooperation
with the sprout industry, developed a
video to advise the sprout industry on
how to produce safer product.
For several years following release of
FDA’s guidance documents, foodborne
illness outbreaks associated with alfalfa
and clover sprouts appeared to
diminish. In 2000, there was only one
sprout-associated outbreak, compared to
6 outbreaks in 1999. Between 2000 and
2002, salmonellosis emerged as a
foodborne illness associated with
consumption of raw or lightly cooked
mung bean sprouts. Recently, alfalfa
sprouts remerged as a significant vehicle
for foodborne illness, with 5 outbreaks
in 2003 and 2 outbreaks in 2004.
We have observed a downward trend
in the average number of cases
associated with an outbreak since
issuance of FDA’s sprout guidances.
Between 1996 and 1999, there were 14
outbreaks with 1,364 reported illnesses,
an average of 97 cases per outbreak.
Since FDA issued its sprout guidances,
there have been 13 outbreaks with 272
reported illnesses, an average of 21
cases per outbreak.
FDA believes that the 1999 sprout
guidances have had a significant
positive effect on reducing both the
number of outbreaks associated with
sprouts and on the number of cases per
outbreak. However, based on continuing
outbreaks associated with raw and
lightly cooked sprouts, the agency is
concerned that further action may be
needed to ensure sustained adoption of
effective preventive controls by the seed
and sprout industry as a whole. In
October 2004, FDA released the Produce
Action Plan. Now, FDA is considering
whether a proposed regulation is
needed to codify and expand on the
existing sprout guidance.
FDA believes that a good first step to
improving the safety of sprouts is to
engage and solicit the views of other
Government agencies at the Federal
(Environmental Protection Agency, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Centers for
Disease Control), state, and local levels,
from industry, from consumer groups,
and from the public generally about the
current science relating to preventing or
minimizing foodborne illness associated
with the consumption of sprouts. The
public meeting and period for
submission of written comments are
intended to provide that opportunity.
FDA requests that comments presented
at the public meeting or otherwise
communicated to the agency focus on
the questions set out in section II of this
document.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20853
II. Questions
1. What concepts or underlying
principles should guide efforts to
improve the safety of sprouts?
2. Which practices primarily
contribute to the contamination with
harmful pathogens of seeds used for
sprouting? Which intervention strategies
can help prevent, reduce, or control this
contamination of seeds used for
sprouting? Where appropriate, identify
barriers to adopting effective preventive
controls for this contamination, and, if
possible, suggest mechanisms to
overcome these barriers.
3. Which practices primarily
contribute to the contamination with
harmful pathogens of sprouts? Which
intervention strategies can help prevent,
reduce, or control the contamination of
sprouts? Where appropriate, identify
barriers to adopting effective preventive
controls for this contamination, and, if
possible, suggest mechanisms to
overcome these barriers.
4. Do the preventive controls
recommended in FDA’s sprout
guidances (https://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/
~dms/sprougd1.html and https://
vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/sprougd2.html)
need to be expanded or otherwise
revised? If yes, please describe generally
the areas that need expansion or other
revision.
4. Although FDA’s current
recommendations address practices by
all parties, efforts to promote adoption
of effective preventive controls have
focused largely on sprouting facilities.
What can or should be done to increase
the involvement of producers of seeds
for sprouting and seed distributors to
ensure the safety of sprouts?
5. Is a regulation likely to be an
effective means of achieving the goal of
minimizing foodborne illness associated
with the consumption of sprouts? If not,
what is likely to be an effective
approach?
6. How can progress toward the
overarching goal (to minimize
foodborne illness associated with sprout
consumption) be effectively measured?
7. There is broad variation within the
seed and sprout industry, including
variations in size of establishments, the
types of seeds and sprouts produced,
the practices used in production, and,
possibly, variations in the vulnerability
of a particular type of seed or sprout to
microbial hazards or in the effectiveness
of particular interventions. How, if at
all, should the actions to improve the
safety of seeds for sprouting be
structured to take into account such
variation? For example, should there be
different sets of interventions for
identifiable segments of the seed
E:\FR\FM\22APP1.SGM
22APP1
20854
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 77 / Friday, April 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
industry? Similarly, how, if at all,
should the actions to improve the safety
of sprouts be structured to take into
account such variation? For example,
should there be different sets of
interventions for identifiable segments
of the sprouts industry? If yes, please
describe.
8. Are there existing food safety
systems or standards (such as
international standards) that FDA
should consider as part of the agency’s
efforts to minimize foodborne illness
associated with the consumption of
sprouts? Please identify these systems or
standards and explain how their
consideration might contribute to this
effort.
III. Registration and Requests for Oral
Presentations
You may register through FDA’s Web
site https://www.cfsan.fda.gov/ and
choose ‘‘Public Meetings,’’ by fax, or email (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT). For security reasons and due
to space limitations, we recommend that
you register at least 5 days before the
meeting. Registration will be accepted
on a first-come basis; if you need special
accommodations due to a disability,
please inform the contact person at least
7 days in advance (see FOR FURTHER
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Apr 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
INFORMATION CONTACT). There is no
registration fee for this public meeting,
but early registration is encouraged
because space is limited. In addition,
early registration will expedite entry
into the building and its parking area. If
you require parking, please include the
vehicle make and tag number, if known,
on your registration form. Because the
meeting will be held in a Federal
building, you should also bring a photo
ID and plan for adequate time to pass
through security screening systems.
If you would like to make oral
comments at the meeting, please specify
your interest in speaking when you
register. The amount of time for each
oral presentation may be limited based
upon the number of requests to speak.
FDA encourages individuals or firms
with relevant data or information to
present such information at the meeting
or in written comments to the record.
IV. Transcripts
A transcript will be made of the
proceedings of the meeting. Transcripts
of the meeting may be requested in
writing from FDA’s Freedom of
Information Office (HFI–35), Food and
Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, rm. 12A–16, Rockville, MD 20857,
approximately 30 working days after the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
meeting at a cost of 10 cents a page. The
transcript of the public meeting and all
comments submitted will be available
for public examination at the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
V. Comments
In addition to presenting oral
comments at the public meeting,
interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments on the subject of this
meeting. Submit a single copy of
electronic comments or two paper
copies of any mailed comments, except
that individuals may submit one paper
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in the
brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be
seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: April 18, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–8103 Filed 4–19–05; 2:04 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
E:\FR\FM\22APP1.SGM
22APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 77 (Friday, April 22, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20852-20854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-8103]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Chapter I
[Docket No. 2005N-0147]
Sprout Safety Public Meeting
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a public
meeting to elicit information on the current science related to
foodborne illness associated with the consumption of sprouts. In
October 2004, FDA released a produce safety action plan entitled
``Produce Safety from Production to Consumption: 2004 Action Plan to
Minimize Foodborne Illness Associated with Fresh Produce Consumption''
(Produce Action Plan). One item in the Produce Action Plan is to
initiate rulemaking to minimize foodborne illness associated with the
consumption of sprouted seeds. However, because of the complexities of
the issues and the uncertainty about what the current science could
support, FDA believes that it would be of value to hold a public
meeting to gather information relevant to a possible regulation. We
request that those who speak at the meeting, or otherwise provide FDA
with their comments, focus on the questions relating to the microbial
safety of seeds destined for sprouting and sprouted seeds set out in
section II of this document.
DATES: The public meeting will be held in College Park, MD, on Tuesday,
May 17, 2005, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. We request that everyone
planning to attend the meeting register prior to the meeting. For
security reasons and due to space limitations, we recommend that you
register at least 5 business days before the meeting. You may register
via the Internet and also by fax until close of business 5 days before
the meeting, provided that space is available (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). In addition to participating in the public
meeting, you may submit written or electronic comments until July 18,
2005.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at the Harvey W. Wiley
Federal Bldg., Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-
3835.
Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to https://www.fda.gov/
dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy L. Green, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-306), Food and Drug Administration, 5100
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 301-436-2025, FAX: 301-436-2651,
or e-mail: amy.green@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Since 1996, FDA has responded to 27 outbreaks of foodborne illness
in the United States for which raw or lightly cooked sprouts were the
confirmed or suspected vehicle for the illness. During
[[Page 20853]]
this 9-year period, sprouts accounted for 40 percent of all foodborne
illness outbreaks associated with fresh produce and approximately 20
percent of the reported illnesses. The 27 outbreaks accounted for an
estimated 1,636 reported cases of illness. Although the sprouts
associated with these outbreaks have been primarily alfalfa, clover, or
mung bean sprouts, FDA is concerned about the foodborne illness risk
associated with all types of raw and lightly cooked sprouts. Thus, the
agency has issued several advisories that warn consumers of the risks
associated with consumption of raw or lightly cooked sprouts. The
sprouts involved with the outbreaks have been generally of U.S. origin
while the seeds from which the sprouts have been produced have been
primarily of non-U.S. origin. To date, the causative agents have been
Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157.
Sprouts present a special food safety challenge because the
conditions that promote sprouting of the seed (e.g., temperature,
humidity, available nutrients) also promote the growth of pathogens if
pathogens are present. Seed appears to be the source of contamination
in most of the foodborne illness outbreaks associated with sprout
consumption. However, insanitary conditions at the sprouting facility
appear to have exacerbated any seed contamination problems.
In October 1999, FDA issued a guidance entitled ``Guidance for
Industry: Reducing Microbial Food Safety Hazards for Sprouted Seeds.''
This guidance recommends preventive controls to assist all parties
involved in the production of sprouts (seed producers, seed
conditioners and distributors, and sprout producers) to reduce the risk
of sprouts serving as a vehicle for foodborne illness. The guidance is
available at https://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/dms/sprougd1.html. Specific
recommendations in this guidance include development and implementation
of good agricultural practices and good manufacturing practices in the
production and handling of seeds and sprouts, seed disinfection
treatments, and microbial testing of spent irrigation water before the
sprouts enter the food supply. At the same time, FDA issued a second
guidance entitled ``Guidance for Industry: Sampling and Microbial
Testing of Spent Irrigation Water during Sprout Production,'' which
contains recommendations to assist sprout producers in testing spent
irrigation water for pathogens before sprout products enter the food
supply. This second guidance is available at https://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/
dms/sprougd2.html. FDA also served as a technical consultant to the
California Department of Health Services, who, in cooperation with the
sprout industry, developed a video to advise the sprout industry on how
to produce safer product.
For several years following release of FDA's guidance documents,
foodborne illness outbreaks associated with alfalfa and clover sprouts
appeared to diminish. In 2000, there was only one sprout-associated
outbreak, compared to 6 outbreaks in 1999. Between 2000 and 2002,
salmonellosis emerged as a foodborne illness associated with
consumption of raw or lightly cooked mung bean sprouts. Recently,
alfalfa sprouts remerged as a significant vehicle for foodborne
illness, with 5 outbreaks in 2003 and 2 outbreaks in 2004.
We have observed a downward trend in the average number of cases
associated with an outbreak since issuance of FDA's sprout guidances.
Between 1996 and 1999, there were 14 outbreaks with 1,364 reported
illnesses, an average of 97 cases per outbreak. Since FDA issued its
sprout guidances, there have been 13 outbreaks with 272 reported
illnesses, an average of 21 cases per outbreak.
FDA believes that the 1999 sprout guidances have had a significant
positive effect on reducing both the number of outbreaks associated
with sprouts and on the number of cases per outbreak. However, based on
continuing outbreaks associated with raw and lightly cooked sprouts,
the agency is concerned that further action may be needed to ensure
sustained adoption of effective preventive controls by the seed and
sprout industry as a whole. In October 2004, FDA released the Produce
Action Plan. Now, FDA is considering whether a proposed regulation is
needed to codify and expand on the existing sprout guidance.
FDA believes that a good first step to improving the safety of
sprouts is to engage and solicit the views of other Government agencies
at the Federal (Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Centers for Disease Control), state, and local levels,
from industry, from consumer groups, and from the public generally
about the current science relating to preventing or minimizing
foodborne illness associated with the consumption of sprouts. The
public meeting and period for submission of written comments are
intended to provide that opportunity. FDA requests that comments
presented at the public meeting or otherwise communicated to the agency
focus on the questions set out in section II of this document.
II. Questions
1. What concepts or underlying principles should guide efforts to
improve the safety of sprouts?
2. Which practices primarily contribute to the contamination with
harmful pathogens of seeds used for sprouting? Which intervention
strategies can help prevent, reduce, or control this contamination of
seeds used for sprouting? Where appropriate, identify barriers to
adopting effective preventive controls for this contamination, and, if
possible, suggest mechanisms to overcome these barriers.
3. Which practices primarily contribute to the contamination with
harmful pathogens of sprouts? Which intervention strategies can help
prevent, reduce, or control the contamination of sprouts? Where
appropriate, identify barriers to adopting effective preventive
controls for this contamination, and, if possible, suggest mechanisms
to overcome these barriers.
4. Do the preventive controls recommended in FDA's sprout guidances
(https://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/dms/sprougd1.html and https://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/
dms/sprougd2.html) need to be expanded or otherwise revised? If yes,
please describe generally the areas that need expansion or other
revision.
4. Although FDA's current recommendations address practices by all
parties, efforts to promote adoption of effective preventive controls
have focused largely on sprouting facilities. What can or should be
done to increase the involvement of producers of seeds for sprouting
and seed distributors to ensure the safety of sprouts?
5. Is a regulation likely to be an effective means of achieving the
goal of minimizing foodborne illness associated with the consumption of
sprouts? If not, what is likely to be an effective approach?
6. How can progress toward the overarching goal (to minimize
foodborne illness associated with sprout consumption) be effectively
measured?
7. There is broad variation within the seed and sprout industry,
including variations in size of establishments, the types of seeds and
sprouts produced, the practices used in production, and, possibly,
variations in the vulnerability of a particular type of seed or sprout
to microbial hazards or in the effectiveness of particular
interventions. How, if at all, should the actions to improve the safety
of seeds for sprouting be structured to take into account such
variation? For example, should there be different sets of interventions
for identifiable segments of the seed
[[Page 20854]]
industry? Similarly, how, if at all, should the actions to improve the
safety of sprouts be structured to take into account such variation?
For example, should there be different sets of interventions for
identifiable segments of the sprouts industry? If yes, please describe.
8. Are there existing food safety systems or standards (such as
international standards) that FDA should consider as part of the
agency's efforts to minimize foodborne illness associated with the
consumption of sprouts? Please identify these systems or standards and
explain how their consideration might contribute to this effort.
III. Registration and Requests for Oral Presentations
You may register through FDA's Web site https://www.cfsan.fda.gov/ and choose ``Public Meetings,'' by fax, or e-mail (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). For security reasons and due to space
limitations, we recommend that you register at least 5 days before the
meeting. Registration will be accepted on a first-come basis; if you
need special accommodations due to a disability, please inform the
contact person at least 7 days in advance (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT). There is no registration fee for this public meeting, but
early registration is encouraged because space is limited. In addition,
early registration will expedite entry into the building and its
parking area. If you require parking, please include the vehicle make
and tag number, if known, on your registration form. Because the
meeting will be held in a Federal building, you should also bring a
photo ID and plan for adequate time to pass through security screening
systems.
If you would like to make oral comments at the meeting, please
specify your interest in speaking when you register. The amount of time
for each oral presentation may be limited based upon the number of
requests to speak. FDA encourages individuals or firms with relevant
data or information to present such information at the meeting or in
written comments to the record.
IV. Transcripts
A transcript will be made of the proceedings of the meeting.
Transcripts of the meeting may be requested in writing from FDA's
Freedom of Information Office (HFI-35), Food and Drug Administration,
5600 Fishers Lane, rm. 12A-16, Rockville, MD 20857, approximately 30
working days after the meeting at a cost of 10 cents a page. The
transcript of the public meeting and all comments submitted will be
available for public examination at the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
V. Comments
In addition to presenting oral comments at the public meeting,
interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments on the subject of this
meeting. Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper
copies of any mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one
paper copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found
in the brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may
be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: April 18, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-8103 Filed 4-19-05; 2:04 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S