Safety Zone; Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, Chicago, IL, 20809-20811 [05-8071]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 77 / Friday, April 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of
April, 2005.
Jonathan L. Snare,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 05–8080 Filed 4–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09–05–009]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Chicago Sanitary and
Ship Canal, Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone around the
tank barge EMC423 during salvage
operations. This safety zone is necessary
to ensure the safety of workers and
divers during salvage operations of the
tank barge EMC423. The temporary
safety zone prohibits persons or vessels
from entering the zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Chicago or the designated on-scene
representative.
This rule is effective from 5 p.m.
on April 5, 2005, until 5 p.m on May 31,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of the docket (CGD09–
05–009], and are available for inspection
or copying at Commanding Officer, U.S.
Coast Guard Marine Safety Office
Chicago, 215 W. 83rd Street Suite D,
Burr Ridge, IL 60527, between 8 a.m.
and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LTJG Cameron Land, U.S. Coast Guard
Marine Safety Office Chicago, at (630)
986–2155.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. This safety
zone is temporary in nature and limited
time existed for an NPRM. Under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for making this
rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Delaying this rule would be
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Apr 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
impracticable and contrary to public
interest as boating season is resuming
and immediate action is necessary to
clear the barge from the canal and
perform clean up of the surrounding
area; further, immediate action is
necessary to ensure the safety of persons
and vessels during the salvage
operations and to prevent possible loss
of life or property. During the
enforcement of this safety zone,
comments will be accepted and
reviewed and may result in a
modification to the rule.
Background and Purpose
On January 19, 2005, the tank barge
EMC423 was involved in a marine
casualty on the Chicago Sanitary and
Ship Canal (CSSC) at Mile Marker 317.5.
The barge sustained an explosion and
partially sank with a full load of
clarified slurry oil on board. Salvage
and recovery operations are underway.
With the change in weather and
increase in recreational vessel traffic in
the area, the Captain of the Port Chicago
finds it necessary to implement
operational restrictions and control
vessel traffic through the area to protect
response workers, vessels transiting the
zone, and to maintain the integrity of
the site.
Discussion of Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone
from bank-to-bank beginning at the
Cicero Avenue Bridge at Mile Marker
317.3 and ending at the Belt Railroad
Bridge at Mile Marker 317.5 on the
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal.
Vessels will not be allowed to enter
the safety zone, without the express
permission of the Captain of the Port
Chicago or the designated on-scene
representative. It is anticipated that
controlled passage of vessels will be
possible on a case-by-case basis.
Barges transiting the area will be
limited to dry cargo, 35 foot wide with
drafts not exceeding 9-feet. Up bound
tows are limited to one barge. Down
bound tows are limited to one loaded
barge or two empty barges. All down
bound tows require a bow assist boat.
All commercial and recreational
vessels must contact the Coast Guard
Forward Command Post via VHF–FM
Channel 19 or land line at 630–336–
0291 to request permission to transit
through the safety zone.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20809
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
This finding is based on the relatively
small percentage of vessels that would
fall within the applicability of the
regulation, the relatively small size of
the limited access area around the
EMC423 tank barge, the minimal
amount of time that vessels will be
restricted when the zone is being
enforced. In addition, vessels that will
need to enter the zone may request
permission on a case-by-case basis from
the Captain of the Port or the designated
on-scene representatives.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule affects the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit through the
safety zone in and around the sunken
barge.
This rule would not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities because the restrictions affect
only a limited area for a brief amount of
time as this safety zone is effective only
when salvage operations on the tank
barge EMC423 is underway. Further,
transit through the zone may be
permitted with proper authorization
from the Captain of the Port Chicago or
his designated representative.
Additionally, the opportunity to engage
in recreational activities outside the
limits of the safety zone will not be
disrupted.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
E:\FR\FM\22APR1.SGM
22APR1
20810
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 77 / Friday, April 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
ADDRESSES)
explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process. If the rule will affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact LTJG
Cameron Land, Coast Guard Marine
Safety Office Chicago, at (630) 986–
2155.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Apr 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. Under figure 2–1,
paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction, an
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are not required for this
rule. A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ will be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. From 5 p.m. on April 5, 2005 until
5 p.m. on May 31, 2005 add
§ 165.T09.009 to read as follows:
I
§ 165.T09.009 Safety Zone; Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal, Chicago, IL.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: From bank-to-bank
beginning at the Cicero Avenue Bridge
at Mile Marker 317.3 and ending at the
Belt Railroad Bridge at Mile Marker
317.5 on the Chicago Sanitary and Ship
Canal.
E:\FR\FM\22APR1.SGM
22APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 77 / Friday, April 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with the general regulations in 165.23 of
this part, vessels will not be allowed to
enter the safety zone without the
express permission of the Captain of the
Port Chicago or the designated on-scene
representative. It is anticipated that
controlled passage of vessels will be
possible on a case-by-case basis.
(2) Barges transiting the area will be
limited to dry cargo, 35 foot wide with
drafts not exceeding 9-feet. Up bound
tows are limited to one barge. Down
bound tows are limited to one loaded
barge or two empty barges. All down
bound tows require a bow assist boat.
(3) All commercial and recreational
vessels must contact the Coast Guard
Forward Command Post via VHF–FM
Channel 19 or land line at 630–336–
0291 to request permission to transit
through the safety zone.
(c) Effective Date. This regulation is
effective from 5 pm on April 05, 2005,
through 5 pm on May 31, 2005, unless
cancelled sooner by the Captain of the
Port Chicago by Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
Dated: April 5, 2005.
T.W. Carter,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Chicago.
[FR Doc. 05–8071 Filed 4–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP Mobile–04–057]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Port of Mobile, Mobile
Ship Channel, Mobile, AL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing permanent security zones
around all cruise ships while transiting
or moored in the Port of Mobile and
Mobile Ship Channel shoreward of the
Mobile Sea Buoy. These security zones
are needed to ensure the safety and
security of these vessels. Entry into
these zones is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port Mobile or a designated
representative.
This rule is effective at 6 p.m. on
May 23, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
DATES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Apr 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket (COTP Mobile 04–057) and are
available for inspection or copying at
Marine Safety Office Mobile, Brookley
Complex, Bldg 102, South Broad Street,
Mobile, AL 36615–1390 between 8 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant (LT) Maurice York,
Operations Department, Marine Safety
Office Mobile, at (251) 441–5940.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On January 7, 2005, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled ‘‘Security Zone; Port of Mobile,
Mobile Ship Channel, Mobile, AL’’ in
the Federal Register (70 FR 1400). We
received no comments on the proposed
rule. No public hearing was requested,
and none was held.
Background and Purpose
On September 11, 2001, both towers
of the World Trade Center and the
Pentagon were attacked by terrorists.
The President has continued the
national emergencies he declared
following those attacks (69 FR 55313
(Sep. 13, 2004) (continuing the
emergency declared with respect to
terrorist attacks); 69 FR 56923 (Sep. 22,
2004) (continuing emergency with
respect to persons who commit, threaten
to commit or support terrorism)). The
President also has found pursuant to
law, including the Magnuson Act (50
U.S.C. 191 et seq.), that the security of
the United States is and continues to be
endangered following the terrorist
attacks (E.O. 13,273, 67 FR 56215 (Sep.
3, 2002) (security of U.S. endangered by
disturbances in international relations
of U.S. and such disturbances continue
to endanger such relations)). In response
to these terrorist acts and warnings,
heightened awareness for the security
and safety of all vessels, ports, and
harbors is necessary.
On November 12, 2004, the Coast
Guard published a temporary final rule
entitled ‘‘Security Zone; Port of Mobile,
Mobile Ship Channel, Mobile, AL’’ (69
FR 65373). This temporary final rule
established temporary security zones
around cruise ships when transiting the
Mobile Ship Channel and Port of
Mobile, as well as when moored in the
Port of Mobile. This temporary final rule
will expire at 6 p.m. on April 14, 2005.
However, due to the increased security
concerns surrounding the transit of
cruise ships, the Captain of the Port
Mobile is establishing permanent
security zones around all cruise ships
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20811
while such vessels are transiting the
Mobile Ship Channel or Port of Mobile,
and while moored in the Port of Mobile.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
We received no comments on the
proposed rule, and no changes have
been made from the proposed rule.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
These security zones will only be
enforced while cruise ships are located
shoreward of the Mobile Sea Buoy, are
transiting the Mobile Ship Channel, and
are moored in the Port of Mobile. Once
a cruise ship is moored in the Port of
Mobile, the security zone will be
reduced to 25 yards. While the cruise
ship is moored, other vessels will be
able to safely transit around this zone
provided they approach no closer than
25 yards. Additionally, while a cruise
ship is in transit on the Mobile Ship
Channel or in the Port of Mobile, the
Captain of the Port or a designated
representative may allow other persons
or vessels to enter into the security zone
for the purpose of passing or overtaking
a cruise ship if such persons or vessels
obtain permission from the on-scene
Coast Guard representative prior to
initiating such action.
Notifications of the enforcement
periods of this security zone will be
made to the marine community through
broadcast notice to mariners. The
impacts on routine navigation are
expected to be minimal.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
E:\FR\FM\22APR1.SGM
22APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 77 (Friday, April 22, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20809-20811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-8071]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09-05-009]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, Chicago, IL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone around the tank
barge EMC423 during salvage operations. This safety zone is necessary
to ensure the safety of workers and divers during salvage operations of
the tank barge EMC423. The temporary safety zone prohibits persons or
vessels from entering the zone unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Chicago or the designated on-scene representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 5 p.m. on April 5, 2005, until 5 p.m
on May 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of the docket (CGD09-05-009], and are available for
inspection or copying at Commanding Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Marine
Safety Office Chicago, 215 W. 83rd Street Suite D, Burr Ridge, IL
60527, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTJG Cameron Land, U.S. Coast Guard
Marine Safety Office Chicago, at (630) 986-2155.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. This safety zone is temporary
in nature and limited time existed for an NPRM. Under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this
rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying this rule would be impracticable and contrary to
public interest as boating season is resuming and immediate action is
necessary to clear the barge from the canal and perform clean up of the
surrounding area; further, immediate action is necessary to ensure the
safety of persons and vessels during the salvage operations and to
prevent possible loss of life or property. During the enforcement of
this safety zone, comments will be accepted and reviewed and may result
in a modification to the rule.
Background and Purpose
On January 19, 2005, the tank barge EMC423 was involved in a marine
casualty on the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal (CSSC) at Mile Marker
317.5. The barge sustained an explosion and partially sank with a full
load of clarified slurry oil on board. Salvage and recovery operations
are underway. With the change in weather and increase in recreational
vessel traffic in the area, the Captain of the Port Chicago finds it
necessary to implement operational restrictions and control vessel
traffic through the area to protect response workers, vessels
transiting the zone, and to maintain the integrity of the site.
Discussion of Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone from bank-to-bank beginning at
the Cicero Avenue Bridge at Mile Marker 317.3 and ending at the Belt
Railroad Bridge at Mile Marker 317.5 on the Chicago Sanitary and Ship
Canal.
Vessels will not be allowed to enter the safety zone, without the
express permission of the Captain of the Port Chicago or the designated
on-scene representative. It is anticipated that controlled passage of
vessels will be possible on a case-by-case basis.
Barges transiting the area will be limited to dry cargo, 35 foot
wide with drafts not exceeding 9-feet. Up bound tows are limited to one
barge. Down bound tows are limited to one loaded barge or two empty
barges. All down bound tows require a bow assist boat.
All commercial and recreational vessels must contact the Coast
Guard Forward Command Post via VHF-FM Channel 19 or land line at 630-
336-0291 to request permission to transit through the safety zone.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary.
This finding is based on the relatively small percentage of vessels
that would fall within the applicability of the regulation, the
relatively small size of the limited access area around the EMC423 tank
barge, the minimal amount of time that vessels will be restricted when
the zone is being enforced. In addition, vessels that will need to
enter the zone may request permission on a case-by-case basis from the
Captain of the Port or the designated on-scene representatives.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule affects the following entities, some of which might be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
through the safety zone in and around the sunken barge.
This rule would not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the restrictions affect only a limited
area for a brief amount of time as this safety zone is effective only
when salvage operations on the tank barge EMC423 is underway. Further,
transit through the zone may be permitted with proper authorization
from the Captain of the Port Chicago or his designated representative.
Additionally, the opportunity to engage in recreational activities
outside the limits of the safety zone will not be disrupted.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
[[Page 20810]]
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If the
rule will affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact LTJG Cameron Land, Coast Guard
Marine Safety Office Chicago, at (630) 986-2155.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g) of the
Instruction, an ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are not required for this rule.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final ``Categorical
Exclusion Determination'' will be available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. From 5 p.m. on April 5, 2005 until 5 p.m. on May 31, 2005 add Sec.
165.T09.009 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09.009 Safety Zone; Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal,
Chicago, IL.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: From bank-to-
bank beginning at the Cicero Avenue Bridge at Mile Marker 317.3 and
ending at the Belt Railroad Bridge at Mile Marker 317.5 on the Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal.
[[Page 20811]]
(b) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
165.23 of this part, vessels will not be allowed to enter the safety
zone without the express permission of the Captain of the Port Chicago
or the designated on-scene representative. It is anticipated that
controlled passage of vessels will be possible on a case-by-case basis.
(2) Barges transiting the area will be limited to dry cargo, 35
foot wide with drafts not exceeding 9-feet. Up bound tows are limited
to one barge. Down bound tows are limited to one loaded barge or two
empty barges. All down bound tows require a bow assist boat.
(3) All commercial and recreational vessels must contact the Coast
Guard Forward Command Post via VHF-FM Channel 19 or land line at 630-
336-0291 to request permission to transit through the safety zone.
(c) Effective Date. This regulation is effective from 5 pm on April
05, 2005, through 5 pm on May 31, 2005, unless cancelled sooner by the
Captain of the Port Chicago by Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Dated: April 5, 2005.
T.W. Carter,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Chicago.
[FR Doc. 05-8071 Filed 4-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P