Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Limited Models B4-PC11, B4-PC11A, and B4-PC11AF Sailplanes, 20708-20710 [05-7563]
Download as PDF
20708
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 76 / Thursday, April 21, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
perform critical functions. The term
‘‘critical’’ means those functions whose
failure would contribute to, or cause, a
failure condition that would prevent the
continued safe flight and landing of the
airplane. The systems identified by the
hazard analysis that perform critical
functions are candidates for the
application of HIRF requirements. A
system may perform both critical and
non-critical functions. Primary
electronic flight display systems, and
their associated components, perform
critical functions such as attitude,
altitude, and airspeed indication. The
HIRF requirements apply only to critical
functions.
Compliance with HIRF requirements
may be demonstrated by tests, analysis,
models, similarity with existing
systems, or any combination of these.
Service experience alone is not
acceptable since normal flight
operations may not include an exposure
to the HIRF environment. Reliance on a
system with similar design features for
redundancy as a means of protection
against the effects of external HIRF is
generally insufficient since all elements
of a redundant system are likely to be
exposed to the fields concurrently.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Cessna
182T and T182T airplanes with the
Garmin GFC–700 digital autopilot.
Should Garmin International Inc. apply
later for a Supplemental Type
Certificate on another model on the
same type certification data sheet to
incorporate the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would apply to that model as well
under the provisions of § 21.101.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on the
Cessna 182T and T182T airplanes. It is
not a rule of general applicability and
affects only the applicant who applied
to the FAA for approval of these features
on the airplane.
The substance of these special
conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several
prior instances and has been derived
without substantive change from those
previously issued. It is unlikely that
prior public comment would result in a
significant change from the substance
contained herein. For this reason, and
because a delay would significantly
affect the certification of the airplane,
which is imminent, the FAA has
determined that prior public notice and
comment are unnecessary and
impracticable, and good cause exists for
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:25 Apr 20, 2005
Jkt 205001
adopting these special conditions upon
issuance. The FAA is requesting
comments to allow interested persons to
submit views that may not have been
submitted in response to the prior
opportunities for comment described
above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and
symbols.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2004–20006; Directorate
Identifier 2004–CE–49–AD; Amendment 39–
14059; AD 2005–08–07]
RIN 2120–AA64
Citation
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus
Aircraft Limited Models B4–PC11, B4–
PC11A, and B4–PC11AF Sailplanes
The authority citation for these special
conditions is as follows:
AGENCY:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and
44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.101; and 14 CFR
11.38 and 11.19.
PART 23—AIRWORTHINESS
STANDARDS: NORMAL, UTILITY,
ACROBATIC, AND COMMUTER
CATEGORY AIRPLANES
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the following special conditions are
issued as part of the type certification
basis for the Cessna 182T and T182T
airplanes to include a Garmin GFC–700
Autopilot system.
1. Protection of Electrical and
Electronic Systems from High Intensity
Radiated Fields (HIRF). Each system
that performs critical functions must be
designed and installed to ensure that the
operations, and operational capabilities
of these systems to perform critical
functions are not adversely affected
when the airplane is exposed to high
intensity radiated electromagnetic fields
external to the airplane.
2. For the purpose of these special
conditions, the following definition
applies: Critical Functions: Functions
whose failure would contribute to, or
cause, a failure condition that would
prevent the continued safe flight and
landing of the airplane.
I
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on April 8,
2005.
Nancy C. Lane,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–7977 Filed 4–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The FAA adopts a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Pilatus Aircraft Limited (Pilatus) Models
B4–PC11, B4–PC11A, and B4–PC11AF
sailplanes. This AD requires you to
repetitively inspect the control-column
support for cracks and, if any cracks are
found, replace the control-column
support with a new support. This AD
results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by the airworthiness authority for
Switzerland. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct cracks in the controlcolumn support, which could result in
failure of the support. This failure could
lead to loss of the primary flight control
system.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on
June 2, 2005.
As of June 2, 2005, the Director of the
Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in the regulation.
ADDRESSES: To get the service
information identified in this AD,
contact Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Customer
Liaison Manager, CH–6371 Stans,
Switzerland; telephone: +41 41 619
6208; facsimile: +41 41 619 7311; email:
fodermatt@pilatus-aircraft.com or from
Pilatus Business Aircraft Ltd., Product
Support Department, 11755 Airport
Way, Broomfield, Colorado 80021;
telephone: (303) 465–9099; facsimile:
(303) 465–6040.
To view the AD docket, go to the
Docket Management Facility; U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
001 or on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov. The docket number is
FAA–2004–20006; Directorate Identifier
2004–CE–49–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 76 / Thursday, April 21, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4059; facsimile: (816) 329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
What events have caused this AD?
The Federal Office for Civil Aviation
(FOCA), which is the airworthiness
authority for Switzerland, recently
notified FAA that an unsafe condition
may exist on all Pilatus Aircraft Limited
(Pilatus) Models B4–PC11, B4–PC11A,
and B4–PC11AF sailplanes. The FOCA
reports nine occurrences of cracks in the
support of the control-column (part
number (P/N) 112.35.11.072).
What is the potential impact if FAA
took no action? Cracks in the controlcolumn support could result in failure
and lead to loss of the primary flight
control system.
Has FAA taken any action to this
point? We issued a proposal to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include
an AD that would apply to all Pilatus
Aircraft Limited (Pilatus) Models B4–
PC11, B4–PC11A, and B4–PC11AF
sailplanes. This proposal was published
in the Federal Register as a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on
February 11, 2005 (70 FR 7217). The
NPRM proposed to require you to
repetitively inspect the control-column
support for cracks and, if any cracks are
found, replace the control-column
support with a new support.
Comments
Was the public invited to comment?
We provided the public the opportunity
to participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the proposal
or on the determination of the cost to
the public.
Conclusion
What is FAA’s final determination on
this issue? We have carefully reviewed
the available data and determined that
air safety and the public interest require
adopting the AD as proposed except for
minor editorial corrections. We have
determined that these minor
corrections:
—Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
—Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
Changes to 14 CFR Part 39—Effect on
the AD
How does the revision to 14 CFR part
39 affect this AD? On July 10, 2002, the
FAA published a new version of 14 CFR
part 39 (67 FR 47997, July 22, 2002),
which governs the FAA’s AD system.
This regulation now includes material
that relates to altered products, special
flight permits, and alternative methods
of compliance. This material previously
was included in each individual AD.
Since this material is included in 14
CFR part 39, we will not include it in
future AD actions.
Costs of Compliance
How many sailplanes does this AD
impact? We estimate that this AD affects
32 sailplanes in the U.S. registry.
What is the cost impact of this AD on
owners/operators of the affected
sailplanes? We estimate the following
costs to do the inspection of the controlcolumn support:
Total cost per
sailplane
Labor cost
Parts cost
1 work hour × $65 per hour = $65 ...................................................
Not applicable .............................
We estimate the following costs to do
any necessary replacements that would
be required based on the results of this
inspection. We have no way of
determining the number of sailplanes
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:25 Apr 20, 2005
Jkt 205001
Parts cost
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this AD.
Regulatory Findings
Will this AD impact various entities?
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Will this AD involve a significant rule
or regulatory action? For the reasons
discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
PO 00000
Frm 00017
32 × $65 = $2,080
that may need this replacement of the
control-column support:
5 work hours × $65 per hour = $325 ....................................................................................................................
What authority does FAA have for
issuing this rulemaking action? Title 49
of the United States Code specifies the
FAA’s authority to issue rules on
aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106
describes the authority of the FAA
Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the
scope of the agency’s authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
Total cost on U.S.
operators
$65
Labor cost
Authority for This Rulemaking
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20709
Total cost
per sailplane
$250
$575
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs
to comply with this AD (and other
information as included in the
Regulatory Evaluation) and placed it in
the AD Docket. You may get a copy of
this summary by sending a request to us
at the address listed under ADDRESSES.
Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2004–20006;
Directorate Identifier 2004–CE–49–AD’’
in your request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
20710
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 76 / Thursday, April 21, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration
amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
When Does This AD Become Effective?
(a) This AD becomes effective on June 2,
2005.
What Other ADs Are Affected by This
Action?
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
(b) None.
What Is the Unsafe Condition Presented in
This AD?
(d) This AD is the result of mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by the airworthiness authority for
Switzerland. The actions specified in this AD
are intended to detect and correct cracks in
the control-column support, which could
result in failure of the support. This failure
could lead to loss of the primary flight
control system.
[Amended]
2. FAA amends § 39.13 by adding a
new AD to read as follows:
I
What Sailplanes Are Affected by This AD?
What Must I Do To Address This Problem?
(c) This AD affects Models B4–PC11, B4–
PC11A, and B4–PC11AF sailplanes, all serial
numbers, that are certificated in any category.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
2005–08–07 Pilatus Aircraft Limited:
Amendment 39–14059; Docket No.
FAA–2004–20006; Directorate Identifier
2004–CE–49–AD.
(e) To address this problem, you must do
the following:
Actions
Compliance
Procedures
(1) Inspect the control-column support (part
number (P/N) 112.35.11.072) for cracks.
Initially inspect within 12 calendar months
after the last inspection under Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Service Bulletin No. 1005, Revision No. 1, dated April 9, 2003, or Pilatus
Aircraft Ltd. Service Bulletin No. 1005, Revision No. 2, dated April 22, 2004, where no
cracks were found or within the next 30
days after June 2, 2005 (the effective date
of this AD), whichever occurs later, unless
already done. Repetitively inspect 2004.
thereafter at intervals not to exceed every
12 calendar months regardless of whether
the control-column support was replaced.
Before further flight after the inspection required by paragraph (e)(1) of this AD where
you found the crack. Continue the repetitive
inspections required by paragraph (e)(1) of
this AD.
Follow Pilatus B4–PC 11 Aircraft Ltd. Service
Bulletin No. 1005, Revision No. 2, dated
April 22, 2004.
PC 11 Aircraft Ltd. Service Bulletin No. 1005,
Revision No. 2, dated April 22, 2004. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service
bulletin in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51. To get a copy of this
service information, contact Pilatus Aircraft
Ltd., Customer Liaison Manager, CH–6371
Stans, Switzerland; telephone: +41 41 619
6208; facsimile: +41 41 619 7311; email:
fodermatt@pilatus-aircraft.com or from
Pilatus Business Aircraft Ltd., Product
Support Department, 11755 Airport Way,
Broomfield, Colorado 80021; telephone: (303)
465–9099; facsimile: (303) 465–6040. To
review copies of this service information, go
to the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html or call (202) 741–6030. To
view the AD docket, go to the Docket
Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Nassif Building, Room PL–401, Washington,
DC 20590–001 or on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov. The docket number is FAA–
2004–20006; Directorate Identifier 2004–CE–
49–AD.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April
11, 2005.
Nancy C. Lane,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–7563 Filed 4–20–05; 8:45 am]
(2) If any cracks are found after the inspection
required by paragraph (e)(1) of this AD, replace the control-column support (P/N
112.35.11.072) with a new control-column
support (P/N 112.35.11.072).
May I Request an Alternative Method of
Compliance?
(f) You may request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD by following the procedures in 14
CFR 39.19. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise,
send your request to your principal
inspector. The principal inspector may add
comments and will send your request to the
Manager, Standards Office, Small Airplane
Directorate, FAA. For information on any
already approved alternative methods of
compliance, contact Doug Rudolph,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4059; facsimile: (816) 329–4090.
May I Obtain a Special Flight Permit for the
Initial Inspection Requirement of This AD?
(g) No. Special flight permits are not
allowed for this AD.
Is There Other Information That Relates to
This Subject?
(h) Swiss AD Number HB 2004–491, dated
December 23, 2004, also addresses the
subject of this AD.
Does This AD Incorporate Any Material by
Reference?
(i) You must do the actions required by this
AD following the instructions in Pilatus B4–
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:25 Apr 20, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Follow Pilatus B4–PC 11 Aircraft Ltd. Service
Bulletin No. 1005, Revision No. 2, dated
April 22, 2004.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2003–CE–65–AD; Amendment
39–14065; AD 2005–08–13]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Glaser-Dirks
Flugzeugbau GmbH Model DG–800B
Sailplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA adopts a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Glaser-Dirks Flugzeugbau GmbH (DG
Flugzeugbau) Model DG–800B
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 76 (Thursday, April 21, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20708-20710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7563]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2004-20006; Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-49-AD;
Amendment 39-14059; AD 2005-08-07]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Limited Models B4-
PC11, B4-PC11A, and B4-PC11AF Sailplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Pilatus Aircraft Limited (Pilatus) Models B4-PC11, B4-PC11A, and B4-
PC11AF sailplanes. This AD requires you to repetitively inspect the
control-column support for cracks and, if any cracks are found, replace
the control-column support with a new support. This AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the
airworthiness authority for Switzerland. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct cracks in the control-column support, which could
result in failure of the support. This failure could lead to loss of
the primary flight control system.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on June 2, 2005.
As of June 2, 2005, the Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the
regulation.
ADDRESSES: To get the service information identified in this AD,
contact Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Customer Liaison Manager, CH-6371 Stans,
Switzerland; telephone: +41 41 619 6208; facsimile: +41 41 619 7311;
email: fodermatt@pilatus-aircraft.com or from Pilatus Business Aircraft
Ltd., Product Support Department, 11755 Airport Way, Broomfield,
Colorado 80021; telephone: (303) 465-9099; facsimile: (303) 465-6040.
To view the AD docket, go to the Docket Management Facility; U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL-401, Washington, DC 20590-001 or on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov. The docket number is FAA-2004-20006; Directorate
Identifier 2004-CE-49-AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
[[Page 20709]]
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; facsimile: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
What events have caused this AD? The Federal Office for Civil
Aviation (FOCA), which is the airworthiness authority for Switzerland,
recently notified FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on all Pilatus
Aircraft Limited (Pilatus) Models B4-PC11, B4-PC11A, and B4-PC11AF
sailplanes. The FOCA reports nine occurrences of cracks in the support
of the control-column (part number (P/N) 112.35.11.072).
What is the potential impact if FAA took no action? Cracks in the
control-column support could result in failure and lead to loss of the
primary flight control system.
Has FAA taken any action to this point? We issued a proposal to
amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
include an AD that would apply to all Pilatus Aircraft Limited
(Pilatus) Models B4-PC11, B4-PC11A, and B4-PC11AF sailplanes. This
proposal was published in the Federal Register as a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) on February 11, 2005 (70 FR 7217). The NPRM proposed
to require you to repetitively inspect the control-column support for
cracks and, if any cracks are found, replace the control-column support
with a new support.
Comments
Was the public invited to comment? We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We received no
comments on the proposal or on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Conclusion
What is FAA's final determination on this issue? We have carefully
reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD as proposed except for minor
editorial corrections. We have determined that these minor corrections:
--Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
--Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
Changes to 14 CFR Part 39--Effect on the AD
How does the revision to 14 CFR part 39 affect this AD? On July 10,
2002, the FAA published a new version of 14 CFR part 39 (67 FR 47997,
July 22, 2002), which governs the FAA's AD system. This regulation now
includes material that relates to altered products, special flight
permits, and alternative methods of compliance. This material
previously was included in each individual AD. Since this material is
included in 14 CFR part 39, we will not include it in future AD
actions.
Costs of Compliance
How many sailplanes does this AD impact? We estimate that this AD
affects 32 sailplanes in the U.S. registry.
What is the cost impact of this AD on owners/operators of the
affected sailplanes? We estimate the following costs to do the
inspection of the control-column support:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost per
Labor cost Parts cost sailplane Total cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work hour x $65 per hour = $65... Not applicable........ $65 32 x $65 = $2,080
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the results of this inspection. We have
no way of determining the number of sailplanes that may need this
replacement of the control-column support:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost per
Labor cost Parts cost sailplane
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 work hours x $65 per hour = $325...... $250 $575
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
What authority does FAA have for issuing this rulemaking action?
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this AD.
Regulatory Findings
Will this AD impact various entities? We have determined that this
AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
Will this AD involve a significant rule or regulatory action? For
the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD (and
other information as included in the Regulatory Evaluation) and placed
it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by sending a
request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket
No. FAA-2004-20006; Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-49-AD'' in your
request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
[[Page 20710]]
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding a new AD to read as follows:
2005-08-07 Pilatus Aircraft Limited: Amendment 39-14059; Docket No.
FAA-2004-20006; Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-49-AD.
When Does This AD Become Effective?
(a) This AD becomes effective on June 2, 2005.
What Other ADs Are Affected by This Action?
(b) None.
What Sailplanes Are Affected by This AD?
(c) This AD affects Models B4-PC11, B4-PC11A, and B4-PC11AF
sailplanes, all serial numbers, that are certificated in any
category.
What Is the Unsafe Condition Presented in This AD?
(d) This AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for
Switzerland. The actions specified in this AD are intended to detect
and correct cracks in the control-column support, which could result
in failure of the support. This failure could lead to loss of the
primary flight control system.
What Must I Do To Address This Problem?
(e) To address this problem, you must do the following:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actions Compliance Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Inspect the control-column Initially inspect Follow Pilatus B4-
support (part number (P/N) within 12 PC 11 Aircraft
112.35.11.072) for cracks. calendar months Ltd. Service
after the last Bulletin No.
inspection under 1005, Revision
Pilatus Aircraft No. 2, dated
Ltd. Service April 22, 2004.
Bulletin No.
1005, Revision
No. 1, dated
April 9, 2003, or
Pilatus Aircraft
Ltd. Service
Bulletin No.
1005, Revision
No. 2, dated
April 22, 2004,
where no cracks
were found or
within the next
30 days after
June 2, 2005 (the
effective date of
this AD),
whichever occurs
later, unless
already done.
Repetitively
inspect 2004.
thereafter at
intervals not to
exceed every 12
calendar months
regardless of
whether the
control-column
support was
replaced.
(2) If any cracks are found Before further Follow Pilatus B4-
after the inspection required flight after the PC 11 Aircraft
by paragraph (e)(1) of this AD, inspection Ltd. Service
replace the control-column required by Bulletin No.
support (P/N 112.35.11.072) paragraph (e)(1) 1005, Revision
with a new control-column of this AD where No. 2, dated
support (P/N 112.35.11.072). you found the April 22, 2004.
crack. Continue
the repetitive
inspections
required by
paragraph (e)(1)
of this AD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
May I Request an Alternative Method of Compliance?
(f) You may request a different method of compliance or a
different compliance time for this AD by following the procedures in
14 CFR 39.19. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise, send your request to
your principal inspector. The principal inspector may add comments
and will send your request to the Manager, Standards Office, Small
Airplane Directorate, FAA. For information on any already approved
alternative methods of compliance, contact Doug Rudolph, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; facsimile:
(816) 329-4090.
May I Obtain a Special Flight Permit for the Initial Inspection
Requirement of This AD?
(g) No. Special flight permits are not allowed for this AD.
Is There Other Information That Relates to This Subject?
(h) Swiss AD Number HB 2004-491, dated December 23, 2004, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
Does This AD Incorporate Any Material by Reference?
(i) You must do the actions required by this AD following the
instructions in Pilatus B4-PC 11 Aircraft Ltd. Service Bulletin No.
1005, Revision No. 2, dated April 22, 2004. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this
service bulletin in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. To get a copy of this service information, contact Pilatus
Aircraft Ltd., Customer Liaison Manager, CH-6371 Stans, Switzerland;
telephone: +41 41 619 6208; facsimile: +41 41 619 7311; email:
fodermatt@pilatus-aircraft.com or from Pilatus Business Aircraft
Ltd., Product Support Department, 11755 Airport Way, Broomfield,
Colorado 80021; telephone: (303) 465-9099; facsimile: (303) 465-
6040. To review copies of this service information, go to the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html or call (202) 741-6030. To view the AD docket,
go to the Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-
401, Washington, DC 20590-001 or on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov. The docket number is FAA-2004-20006; Directorate
Identifier 2004-CE-49-AD.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 11, 2005.
Nancy C. Lane,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-7563 Filed 4-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P