Notice of Funding Opportunities With the Food Safety and Inspection Service for Food Safety Cooperative Agreements for Fiscal Year 2005, 20517-20521 [05-7955]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 20, 2005 / Notices
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: You may view
APHIS documents published in the
Federal Register and related
information on the Internet at https://
www.aphis.usda. gov/ppd/rad/
webrepor.html.
For
information concerning the proposed
regulations for payment of
compensation if foot-and-mouth disease
occurred in the United States, contact
Dr. Mark Teachman, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, Emergency Management
Staff, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit
41, Riverdale, MD 20737; (301) 734–
8908. For copies of more detailed
information on the information
collection, contact Mrs. Celeste Sickles,
APHIS* Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 734–7477.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Foot-and-Mouth Disease
Payment of Indemnity; Update of
Provisions.
OMB Number: 0579–0199.
Type of Request: Extension of
approval of an information collection.
Abstract: The Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of
the United States Department of
Agriculture administers regulations at 9
CFR part 53 that provide for the
payment of indemnity to owners of
animals that are required to be
destroyed because of foot-and-mouth
disease (FMD), pleuropneumonia,
rinderpest, exotic Newcastle disease,
highly pathogenic avian influenza,
infectious salmon anemia, spring
viremia of carp, or any other
communicable disease of livestock or
poultry that in the opinion of the
Secretary of Agriculture constitutes an
emergency and threatens the U.S.
livestock or poultry population. The
regulations authorize payments based
on the fair market value of the animals
destroyed, as well as payments for their
destruction and disposal. The
regulations also authorize payments for
materials that must be cleaned and
disinfected or destroyed because of
being contaminated by or exposed to
disease.
As a result of a review of part 53 by
APHIS, in part due to past outbreaks of
FMD in the United Kingdom and
elsewhere around the world, we
proposed changes to the regulations to
help ensure a successful control and
eradication program in the event of an
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:34 Apr 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
outbreak of FMD in the United States
(see 67 FR 21934–21959, APHIS Docket
No. 01–069–1, May 1, 2002). The
proposed rule would require eligible
persons to submit claims for
compensation resulting from the
destruction of animals and related
expenses using forms approved by
APHIS. Claimants would also be
expected to provide any supporting
documentation that would assist the
Administrator in verifying the quantity
and value of animals or materials
destroyed and the costs of their
disposition, and the costs of cleaning
and disinfection.
We are asking the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) to
approve this information collection for
an additional 3 years.
The estimate below shows a minimal
burden of 1 hour total because we
believe that an FMD outbreak in the
United States is unlikely. Therefore, we
currently are not collecting information
and do not plan to collect information
unless an outbreak of FMD occurs. In
that event, we would review the
estimated number of respondents and
estimated burden based on the number
of expected respondents in that
situation.
The purpose of this notice is to solicit
comments from the public (as well as
affected agencies) concerning our
information collection. These comments
will help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, through use, as
appropriate, of automated, electronic,
mechanical, and other collection
technologies; e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Estimate of burden: The public
reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 1
hour per response.
Respondents: Owners of animals and
materials destroyed, other claimants
incurring costs for which compensation
might be sought, and program support
personnel including accredited
veterinarians, State animal health
officials, and local authorities who
would be providing assistance in the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20517
event of a national animal disease
emergency.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 1.
Estimated annual number of
responses per respondent: 1.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 1.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 1 hour. (Due to averaging,
the total annual burden hours may not
equal the product of the annual number
of responses multiplied by the reporting
burden per response.)
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
also become a matter of public record.
Done in Washington, DC, this 14th day of
April 2005.
Elizabeth E. Gaston,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E5–1862 Filed 4–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
[Docket No. 05–004N]
Notice of Funding Opportunities With
the Food Safety and Inspection Service
for Food Safety Cooperative
Agreements for Fiscal Year 2005
Food Safety and Inspection
Service.
ACTION: Notice of funding opportunities
for fiscal year 2005.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS) is soliciting
proposals for cooperative agreement
projects to be funded in fiscal year 2005.
Proposals should be made in one or
more of the cooperative agreement
program areas described in this notice.
DATES: Proposals must be submitted by
June 20, 2005.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
FSIS continuously seeks new ideas
and strategies to reduce the incidence of
foodborne illnesses associated with
meat, poultry, and egg products and
protect the food supply. Agency
innovations, notably those associated
with the implementation of Hazard
Analysis and Critical Control Point
(HACCP) systems, have helped reduce
foodborne illnesses in recent years. FSIS
seeks to achieve additional reductions
in foodborne illnesses, and to enhance
food security, through further
improvements in FSIS operations and
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
20518
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 20, 2005 / Notices
through joint efforts with partner
agencies and organizations.
To achieve this goal, FSIS is
authorized to use cooperative
agreements to reflect a relationship
between FSIS and other Federal
agencies, States, or cooperators to carry
out educational programs or special
studies to improve the safety of the
nation’s food supply (Pub. L. 108–7, sec.
713, 117 Stat. 39). Also, FSIS has been
directed to further develop the Food
Emergency Response Network, a
network of Federal, State and local
laboratories that provides the nation the
analytic capabilities and capacity it
needs to cope with agents threatening
the food supply (Pub. L. 108–447; H.R.
Conf. Rpt. 108–792).
Risk analyses have shown that the
safety of food is affected by hazards
throughout the farm-to-table continuum.
FSIS alone does not have the resources
to address and ameliorate all hazards.
FSIS seeks partners to assist in the
development of materials that will have
a national impact on public health. In
keeping with its July 2004 strategy
paper ‘‘Fulfilling the Vision, Initiatives
in Protecting Public Health,’’ FSIS will
engage in cooperative projects that will
achieve measurable enhancement of the
Nation’s public health through food
safety.
With the goal of making demonstrable
improvements in public health through
further science-based reductions in the
incidence of foodborne disease and
hazards associated with meat, poultry,
and egg products, and to enhance food
defenses through improved State and
local government laboratory
participation in the Food Emergency
Response Network, FSIS will fund
cooperative agreements in the following
areas:
1. Food animal production,
transportation, and marketing. Projects
would develop and implement producer
education programs that promote the
use of best practices and interventions
that reduce the potential for pathogens
and other hazards borne by livestock
and poultry to be introduced into meat,
poultry, and egg products produced
from those animals. An example would
be a project to develop practical
methods for controlling Salmonella or
pathogenic E. coli on the farm to
decrease the prevalence of those
bacteria at slaughter.
2. Small and very small inspected
meat, poultry, or egg product
establishments. Projects would assist
small plants (fewer than 500 employees)
and very small plants (10 or fewer
employees, or less than $2.5 million in
annual sales), which often have limited
technical and financial resources with
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:34 Apr 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
which to comply fully with Federal
inspection requirements. FSIS seeks to
develop food safety training and
educational programs and materials to
reflect the needs of diverse customers
and constituents with specific food
safety concerns. The Nation’s diverse
population is reflected in its diverse
food industry, which presents
challenges for regulatory authorities,
who must communicate effectively with
them on a range of food safety issues.
Projects would equip FSIS and its food
safety partners to better overcome
language and cultural barriers in
delivering essential food safety
messages to these firms. Projects would
help FSIS and state meat and poultry
inspection program officials identify
and address food safety and public
health concerns associated with
particular geographic regions or specific
minority populations. FSIS is seeking to
develop new and innovative materials
that cover topics such as Listeria
monocytogenes in ready-to-eat meat and
poultry products, validation of pathogen
controls in small plants, assessing the
effectiveness of food safety systems, and
building on lessons learned from
HACCP systems.
3. Retail stores, food service
establishments, and other inspectionexempt small businesses processing or
handling meat, poultry, and egg
products. Projects would assist State
and local agencies to promote, and food
businesses under their jurisdiction to
adopt, appropriate controls and
interventions to ensure that inspectionexempt meat and poultry products being
produced are safe and wholesome and
that inspected meat and poultry
products being handled and prepared
remain safe and wholesome for
consumers. Projects may address State
and local retail inspectors’ needs for
tools to ensure the safety of meat and
poultry processed or handled at retail,
reducing the potential for Listeria
monocytogenes contamination of readyto-eat meat and poultry products, and
ways to leverage current Federal, State,
and local food safety activities to more
effectively protect consumers.
4. Applications of new technologies
that will permit small and very small
meat, poultry, and egg product
establishments to produce safer
products. Projects would assist small
and very small plants to adapt and use
new technologies, including
interventions, processes, and systems, to
enhance product safety.
5. Enhancement of laboratory testing
capability of the Food Emergency
Response Network for microbiological
threat agents. Cooperative agreements
will develop programs to assist State
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and local laboratories to augment
microbiological threat agent testing
capacities and increase the number of
member laboratories that are able to
perform threat agent testing for the
network. The agreements will enhance
laboratories’ ability to analyze for
microbiological threat agents using
FERN methods and improve laboratory
capacities for surveillance and outbreak
response. The agreements will support
training in FERN threat agent methods
and the purchase of supplies and
equipment required by the methods.
After training and demonstration of
proficiency, laboratories will participate
in validation studies with various food
matrices as well as surveillance
activities sponsored by FERN.
FSIS expects to allocate
approximately $2,500,000 to fund
cooperative agreements in these areas
this fiscal year. The approximate
amount available for each area, and the
range in dollars for proposed
cooperative projects, is provided below.
Academic institutions; State, local and
tribal government agencies; and nonprofit organizations are invited to
submit brief proposals (one to two
pages) for cooperative agreements in any
of the areas described. These proposals
will be reviewed by FSIS. If reviewers
find that the proposals would further
the food safety and public health goals
of FSIS, are applicable nationwide to
targeted audiences, can be reproduced
and disseminated, and reflect new
materials or approaches, submitters will
be invited to further develop the
proposals for consideration as
cooperative agreements with FSIS, as
funding is available.
Proposals are due June 20, 2005. FSIS
will review and respond to proposals by
August 3, 2005. Unlike typical Federal
grants, cooperative agreements involve a
Federal agency’s active participation
with the cooperator during both project
development and project execution.
Work products are intended to be
available for public use nationwide. The
criteria used by FSIS to assess proposals
are listed for each cooperative
agreement program area. Cooperators
whose proposals are selected for further
project development will need to
discuss and reach agreement with FSIS
on project details to permit
establishment of a cooperative
agreement no later than July 30, 2005.
All proposals should address the
following points:
• Project description, including
specific goals, timeline, and deliverables
• Description of national public
benefit expected, including expected
utility of work products, for example,
training manuals, CDs, and videos
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 20, 2005 / Notices
• Projected costs, including
cooperator contributions
• Projected performance measures
• Primary contact, principal
investigator, and other likely
participants, and
• Public domain; work products may
be freely reproduced and distributed by
FSIS.
Multi-year projects will be
considered, but they are subject to
annual renewal and may be affected by
changes in FSIS’ annual budget. The
number of projects funded each year is
determined by the number of proposals
received, the extent to which they will
further the food safety and public health
goals of the Agency, the performance of
ongoing projects, and funding
availability.
Proposals are being solicited for fiscal
year 2005 for the following five
cooperative agreement program areas:
1. Food animal production,
transportation, and marketing
Description: Cooperative agreements
will support State-level partnerships to
bring together food animal producers,
veterinarians, Extension specialists,
State and Federal animal health
officials, and State and Federal public
health officials to provide information
and education to food animal producers.
Partnerships will develop and distribute
to producers educational materials that
strengthen food safety through adoption
of animal production practices that
support pathogen reduction and residue
avoidance in food animals. State food
safety partnerships will provide a
continuing non-regulatory infrastructure
for information sharing among all levels
of government and the food animal
industries and will enhance and
recognize Quality Assurance Programs
(QAP) as a basic element of pre-harvest
food safety.
Funding Level: The total level for
fiscal year 2005 is approximately
$500,000. Agreements usually will not
exceed $50,000.
Evaluation Criteria: Proposals for
funding will be ranked in consideration
of certain factors. They are, in order of
significance:
• Proposal’s feasibility and relevance
to pre-harvest food safety
• Participation by State animal health
or public health officials
• Participation by food animal
industry leaders
• Special animal health or food safety
needs of industry
• Demonstrated ability to develop
and deliver to producers information on
food safety awareness and safe
production practices
• Food animal population affected
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:34 Apr 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
• Cooperator’s past performance in
animal and egg production food safety
cooperative agreements, and
• Geographic distribution of States
(need for national presence).
Submit Proposals to:
john.ragan@fsis.usda. Although
electronic submissions are encouraged,
proposals also may be mailed to John R.
Ragan, D.V.M., Animal and Egg
Production Food Safety Staff, Zoonotic
Diseases and Residue Surveillance
Division, Office of Public Health
Science, FSIS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Room 343
Aerospace Building, Washington, DC
20250–3700.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
R. Ragan, D.V.M., (202) 690–1277, or
Sibyl Wright, (202) 720–4923,
sibyl.wright@fsis.usda.gov, of the
Animal and Egg Production Food Safety
Staff.
2. Small and very small inspected
meat, poultry or egg product
establishments.
Description: Cooperative agreements
will provide outreach to constituencies
involved in FSIS-regulated activities,
principally small and very small
establishments and establishments in
tribal and other underserved areas.
Projects support training, education,
and outreach that will promote more
effective use of HACCP systems,
appropriate responses to emerging food
safety and food security concerns,
understanding of the latest information
on foodborne illness and hazards,
availability of new procedures and
technologies for hazard avoidance and
mitigation, and security guidance.
Funding Level: The total level is
approximately $250,000. Agreements
typically range from $10,000 to $30,000.
Larger amounts may be considered for
compelling projects.
Evaluation Criteria: Proposals for
funding will be ranked in consideration
of certain factors. They are, in order of
significance:
• Responds to the needs of small and
very small plants
• Provides for measurable,
documented results
• Provides a degree of innovation
• Assists small and very small plants
to maintain effective HACCP systems,
produce safe products, and otherwise
comply with Federal regulations
• Provides a deliverable product that
can be easily shared and is applicable to
a wide audience. For example, the
project will result in information or
materials and be presented in a format
that can be used by FSIS and its
partners to improve food safety and
impact public health, and
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20519
• Cooperator agrees to contribute
significant resources to the project.
Submit Proposals to:
kathleen.barrett@fsis.usda.gov.
Although electronic submission is
encouraged, proposals also may be
mailed to Kathleen Barrett at Strategic
Initiatives, Partnerships and Outreach
Staff, FSIS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Room 405 Aerospace
Building, Washington, DC 20250.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen Barrett, Strategic Initiatives,
Partnerships and Outreach Staff, at (202)
690–6644.
3. Retail stores, food service
establishments, and other inspectionexempt small businesses processing or
handling meat, poultry, and egg
products.
Description: Projects will promote
adoption of practices by small
businesses, in particular retail and food
service establishments, to reduce or
eliminate food safety hazards to foods
under their control. Projects are
typically aimed at enhancing State,
local, or tribal government food
protection agencies’ outreach
capabilities and ability to make
measurable improvements in food safety
in support of FSIS’ national public
health mission and goals.
Funding Level: The total level is
$250,000. Agreements typically range
from $20,000 to $50,000. Larger
amounts may be considered for
compelling projects.
Evaluation Criteria: Proposals for
funding will be ranked in consideration
of certain factors. They are, in order of
significance:
• Contributes to adoption by firms
producing or handling meat, poultry,
and egg products of the best available
practices for controlling food safety
hazards in their commercial
environment.
• Provides State and local food
inspectors tools for ensuring the safety
of meat and poultry processed or
handled at retail.
• Leverages current Federal, State,
and local food safety activities to more
effectively protect consumers.
• Provides a degree of innovation.
• Provides a deliverable product that
is transferable; that is, the project will
result in information or materials useful
for food safety in other jurisdictions.
• Responds to needs of underserved
areas or populations.
• Involves collaboration among
interested entities; that is, the project
involves industry, academia, Extension,
and consumer groups as well as
government agencies (involvement of a
state food safety task force is desirable).
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
20520
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 20, 2005 / Notices
• Cooperator agrees to contribute
significant resources to the project.
• Reduces the potential for product
contamination, in particular, Listeria
contamination of ready to eat foods.
Submit Proposals to:
ralph.stafko@fsis.usda.gov. Although
electronic submissions are encouraged,
proposals also may be mailed to Ralph
Stafko, Strategic Initiatives,
Partnerships, and Outreach Staff, FSIS,
USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., 405 Aerospace Building,
Washington, DC 20250.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ralph Stafko, Strategic Initiatives,
Partnership, and Outreach Staff, at (202)
690–6520.
4. New Technology that will permit
small and very small meat, poultry and
egg product establishments to produce
safer products.
Description: Cooperative agreements
will promote new technologies or new
adaptations of technologies, including
interventions, processes, or systems,
that will enhance the ability of small
and very small plants to produce safe
and wholesome meat, poultry, and egg
products.
Funding Level: The total is
approximately $500,000. Agreements
will range from $25,000 to $75,000.
Larger contract proposal amounts may
be considered for certain projects that
address FSIS food safety priorities.
Evaluation Criteria: Proposals for
funding will be ranked in consideration
of certain factors. They are, in order of
significance:
• Helps small and very small plants
meet their HACCP and food safety
requirements.
• Helps small and very small plants
to understand how to demonstrate that
a new technology complies with Federal
inspection requirements.
• Provides a degree of innovation.
• Applies new research and
technologies that address current food
safety and public health concerns, such
as properly handling and labeling
products that contain ingredients that
are known allergens.
• Provides deliverable products that
are easily transferable, such as videos,
training programs, and flow charts. The
project will result in information or
materials useful to small and very small
plants to improve food safety.
For example, the subjects of proposals
may include:
• Antimicrobial or other kinds of
interventions to reduce or eliminate E.
coli 0157:H7 in ground meat products.
• Listeria monocytogenes postlethality treatments for ready-to-eat
products.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:34 Apr 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
• The relationship between the level
of Salmonella enteritidis in eggs and egg
products and the molting of poultry.
• The relationship between the level
of Salmonella enteritidis and the
temperature at which eggs have been
held from the day of lay until the day
of processing.
• Salmonella growth and reduction in
shelf-stable ready-to-eat products.
• Cost-effective mechanisms to
determine the temperature of products
while they are being shipped.
• Allergens, food sensitivities, and
intolerances in meat and poultry
products; development of a training
program for small and very small plants
to help with the reassessment of their
HACCP programs as they pertain to any
ingredient that may be an allergen.
• Inoculation challenge studies on
non-thermally processed ready-to-eat
products; for example, validation
studies for dry cured chorizo, basturma,
prosciutto ham, and pancetta.
• The amount of pathogen growth,
such as E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella,
on livestock carcasses during the
cooling process, and the development of
easily understood predictive microbial
models.
• The minimum chamber relative
humidity needed to ensure that the
moisture level on the product surface is
adequate to achieve the desired lethality
without increasing the heat resistance of
bacterial pathogens (for example,
Salmonella spp.).
• Alternative methods, such as
antimicrobial packaging, to achieve
surface lethality for products that had
been exposed to the environment after
lethality treatment.
Submit Proposals to:
shaukat.syed@fsis.usda.gov. Although
electronic submissions are encouraged,
proposals also may be mailed to
Shaukat H. Syed, D.V.M., Director, New
Technology Staff, FSIS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Room
2932, South Building, Washington, DC
20250.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Howard L. Early, D.V.M., New
Technology Staff, at (202) 205–0675.
5. Enhancement of laboratory testing
capability of the Food Emergency
Response Network for microbiological
threat agents.
Description: The Food Emergency
Response Network (FERN) is composed
of State and local government regulatory
laboratories with varying capacities to
perform the testing of threat agents.
Cooperative agreements will develop
programs to assist State and local
laboratories to augment microbiological
threat agent testing capacities and
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
increase the number of member
laboratories that are able to perform
threat agent testing for the network. The
agreements will enhance laboratories’
ability to analyze for microbiological
threat agents using FERN methods and
improve laboratory capacities for
surveillance and outbreak response. The
agreements will support training in
FERN threat agent methods and the
purchase of supplies and equipment
required by the methods. After training
and demonstration of proficiency,
laboratories will participate in
validation studies with various food
matrices as well as surveillance
activities sponsored by FERN.
Funding Level: The total level is
approximately $1,000,000. Agreements
typically range from $50,000 to
$100,000.
Evaluation Criteria: Proposals for
funding will be ranked in consideration
of certain factors. They are, in order of
importance:
• Includes provisions for measurable,
documented results that may be shared
with State and local laboratories, FSIS,
or its agents.
• Provides information useful for the
testing of threat agents in food.
• Possesses basic food analytic
resources to implement the agreement.
• States’ willingness to participate in
method validation, proficiency testing,
and surveillance programs.
Submit Proposals to: Wayne Ziemer,
FERN, FSIS, 950 College Station Road,
Athens, Georgia 30605; telephone (706)
546–3591; facsimile (706) 546–3518;
wayne.ziemer@fsis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frankie J. Beacorn, Biological Food
Security and Emergency Branch, Food
Emergency Response Network Division,
FERN, FSIS, USDA, 950 College Station
Road, Athens, Georgia 30677; telephone
(706) 546–3578; facsimile (706) 546–
3518; frankie.beacorn@fsis.usda.gov.
Additional Public Notification
Public awareness of all segments of
rulemaking and policy development is
important. Consequently, in an effort to
ensure that the public and in particular
minorities, women, and persons with
disabilities are aware of this notice,
FSIS will announce it on-line through
the FSIS Web page located at https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/regulations/
2005_Notices_Index/.
FSIS also will make copies of this
Federal Register publication available
through the FSIS Constituent Update,
which is used to provide information
regarding FSIS policies, procedures,
regulations, Federal Register notices,
FSIS public meetings, recalls, and other
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 20, 2005 / Notices
types of information that could affect or
would be of interest to constituents and
stakeholders. The update is
communicated via Listserv, a free
electronic mail subscription service
consisting of industry, trade, and farm
groups, consumer interest groups, allied
health professionals, scientific
professionals, and other individuals
who have asked to be included. The
update is available on the FSIS Web
page. Through Listserv and the Web
page, FSIS is able to provide
information to a much broader, more
diverse audience.
In addition, FSIS offers an electronic
mail subscription service that provides
an automatic and customized
notification when popular pages are
updated, including Federal Register
publications and related documents.
This service is available at https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/news_and_events/
email_subscription/ and allows FSIS
customers to sign up for subscription
options across eight categories. Options
range from recalls to export information
to regulations, directives, and notices.
Customers can add or delete
subscriptions themselves and have the
option to protect their accounts with
passwords.
Done at Washington, DC, on April 15,
2005.
Barbara J. Masters,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05–7955 Filed 4–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Newspapers Used for Publication of
Legal Notices in the Southwestern
Region, Which Includes Arizona, New
Mexico, and Parts of Oklahoma and
Texas
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This notice lists the
newspapers that will be used by all
Ranger Districts, Grasslands, Forests,
and the Regional Office of the
Southwestern Region to give legal notice
for the availability for comments on
projects under 35 CFR 215, notice of
decisions that may be subject to
administrative appeal under 36 CFR
part 215 or part 217, and for the
opportunities to object to proposed
authorized hazardous fuel reduction
projects under 36 CFR 218.4.
Newspaper publication of notices of
opportunities to comment, to appeal
decisions, or to file objections, is in
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:34 Apr 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
addition to mailings and direct notice
made to those who have participated in
the project planning by submitting
comments and/or requesting notice.
DATES: Use of these newspapers for the
purpose of publishing legal notice for
comment and decision that may be
subject to appeal under 36 CFR part 215
and part 217 and for opportunity to
object under 36 CFR 218 shall begin on
the date of this publication and
continue until further notice.
ADDRESSES: Southwestern Region,
ATTN: Regional Appeals Assistant, 333
Broadway SE., Albuquerque, NM
87102–3498.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Connie Smith, 505–842–3223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Responsible Officials in the
Southwestern Region will give legal
notice of decisions that may be subject
to appeal under 36 CFR part 215 or part
217, or give opportunity to object under
36 CFR 218 in the following newspapers
which are listed by Forest Service
administrative unit. Where more than
one newspaper is listed for any unit, the
first newspaper listed is the primary
newspaper of record which publication
date shall be used for calculating the
time period to file comment, appeal or
an objection.
Southwestern Regional Office
Regional Forester
Notices of Availability for Comment,
Decisions and Objections affecting New
Mexico Forests:—‘‘Albuquerque
Journal’’, Albuquerque, New Mexico, for
National Forest System Lands in the
State of New Mexico and for any
projects of Region-wide impact.
Regional Forester Notices of
Availability for Comment and Decisions
and Objections affecting Arizona
Forests:—‘‘The Arizona Republic’’,
Phoenix, Arizona, for National Forest
System lands in the State of Arizona
and for any projects of Region-wide
impact.
Regional Forester Notices of
Availability for Comment and Decisions
and Objections affecting National
Grasslands in New Mexico, Oklahoma,
and Texas are listed by Grassland and
location as follows: Kiowa National
Grassland notices published in:—
‘‘Union County Leader’’, Clayton New
Mexico. Rita Blanca National Grassland
in Cimarron County, Oklahoma notices
published in:—‘‘Boise City News’’, Boise
City, Oklahoma. Rita Blanca National
Grassland in Dallam County, Texas
notices published in:—‘‘The Dalhart
Texan’’, Dalhart, Texas. Black Kettle
National Grassland in Roger Mills
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20521
County, Oklahoma notices published
in:—‘‘Cheyenne Star’’, Cheyenne,
Oklahoma. Black Kettle National
Grassland in Hemphill County, Texas
notices published in:—‘‘The Canadian
Record’’, Canadian, Texas. McClellan
Creek National Grassland in Gray
County, Texas notices published:—‘‘The
Pampa News’’, Pampa, Texas.
Arizona National Forests
Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests
Notices of Availability for Comment,
Decisions and Objections by Forest
Supervisor and Alpine Ranger District
and Black Mesa Ranger District and
Lakeside Ranger District and
Springerville Ranger District are
published in:—‘‘The White Mountain
Independent’’, Show Low and Navajo
County, Arizona.
Clifton Ranger District Notices are
published in:—‘‘Cooper Era’’, Clifton,
Arizona.
Coconino National Forest
Notices of Availability for Comment,
Decisions and Objections by Forest
Supervisor and Mogollon Ranger
District and Mormon Lake Ranger
District and Peaks Ranger District are
published in:—‘‘Arizona Daily Sun’’,
Flagstaff, Arizona. Red Rock Ranger
District Notices are published in:—‘‘Red
Rock News’’, Sedona, Arizona.
Coronado National Forest
Notices for Availability for
Comments, Decisions and Objections by
Forest Supervisor and Santa Catalina
Ranger District are published in:—‘‘The
Arizona Daily Star’’, Tucson, Arizona.
Douglas Ranger District Notices are
published in:—‘‘Daily Dispatch’’,
Douglas, Arizona.
Nogales Ranger District Notices are
published in:—‘‘Nogales International’’,
Nogales, Arizona.
Sierra Vista Ranger District Notices
are published in:—‘‘Sierra Vesta
Herald’’, Sierra Vista, Arizona.
Safford Ranger District Notices are
published in:—‘‘Eastern Arizona
Courier’’, Safford, Arizona.
Kaibab National Forest
Notices for Availability for
Comments, Decisions and Objections by
Forest Supervisor and North Kaibab
District and Tusayan District and
Williams District Notices are published
in:—‘‘Arizona Daily Sun’’, Flagstaff,
Arizona.
Prescott National Forest
Notices for Availability for
Comments, Decisions and Objections by
Forest Supervisor and Bradshaw Ranger
District and Chino Valley Ranger
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 20, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20517-20521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7955]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
[Docket No. 05-004N]
Notice of Funding Opportunities With the Food Safety and
Inspection Service for Food Safety Cooperative Agreements for Fiscal
Year 2005
AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service.
ACTION: Notice of funding opportunities for fiscal year 2005.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is soliciting
proposals for cooperative agreement projects to be funded in fiscal
year 2005. Proposals should be made in one or more of the cooperative
agreement program areas described in this notice.
DATES: Proposals must be submitted by June 20, 2005.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
FSIS continuously seeks new ideas and strategies to reduce the
incidence of foodborne illnesses associated with meat, poultry, and egg
products and protect the food supply. Agency innovations, notably those
associated with the implementation of Hazard Analysis and Critical
Control Point (HACCP) systems, have helped reduce foodborne illnesses
in recent years. FSIS seeks to achieve additional reductions in
foodborne illnesses, and to enhance food security, through further
improvements in FSIS operations and
[[Page 20518]]
through joint efforts with partner agencies and organizations.
To achieve this goal, FSIS is authorized to use cooperative
agreements to reflect a relationship between FSIS and other Federal
agencies, States, or cooperators to carry out educational programs or
special studies to improve the safety of the nation's food supply (Pub.
L. 108-7, sec. 713, 117 Stat. 39). Also, FSIS has been directed to
further develop the Food Emergency Response Network, a network of
Federal, State and local laboratories that provides the nation the
analytic capabilities and capacity it needs to cope with agents
threatening the food supply (Pub. L. 108-447; H.R. Conf. Rpt. 108-792).
Risk analyses have shown that the safety of food is affected by
hazards throughout the farm-to-table continuum. FSIS alone does not
have the resources to address and ameliorate all hazards. FSIS seeks
partners to assist in the development of materials that will have a
national impact on public health. In keeping with its July 2004
strategy paper ``Fulfilling the Vision, Initiatives in Protecting
Public Health,'' FSIS will engage in cooperative projects that will
achieve measurable enhancement of the Nation's public health through
food safety.
With the goal of making demonstrable improvements in public health
through further science-based reductions in the incidence of foodborne
disease and hazards associated with meat, poultry, and egg products,
and to enhance food defenses through improved State and local
government laboratory participation in the Food Emergency Response
Network, FSIS will fund cooperative agreements in the following areas:
1. Food animal production, transportation, and marketing. Projects
would develop and implement producer education programs that promote
the use of best practices and interventions that reduce the potential
for pathogens and other hazards borne by livestock and poultry to be
introduced into meat, poultry, and egg products produced from those
animals. An example would be a project to develop practical methods for
controlling Salmonella or pathogenic E. coli on the farm to decrease
the prevalence of those bacteria at slaughter.
2. Small and very small inspected meat, poultry, or egg product
establishments. Projects would assist small plants (fewer than 500
employees) and very small plants (10 or fewer employees, or less than
$2.5 million in annual sales), which often have limited technical and
financial resources with which to comply fully with Federal inspection
requirements. FSIS seeks to develop food safety training and
educational programs and materials to reflect the needs of diverse
customers and constituents with specific food safety concerns. The
Nation's diverse population is reflected in its diverse food industry,
which presents challenges for regulatory authorities, who must
communicate effectively with them on a range of food safety issues.
Projects would equip FSIS and its food safety partners to better
overcome language and cultural barriers in delivering essential food
safety messages to these firms. Projects would help FSIS and state meat
and poultry inspection program officials identify and address food
safety and public health concerns associated with particular geographic
regions or specific minority populations. FSIS is seeking to develop
new and innovative materials that cover topics such as Listeria
monocytogenes in ready-to-eat meat and poultry products, validation of
pathogen controls in small plants, assessing the effectiveness of food
safety systems, and building on lessons learned from HACCP systems.
3. Retail stores, food service establishments, and other
inspection-exempt small businesses processing or handling meat,
poultry, and egg products. Projects would assist State and local
agencies to promote, and food businesses under their jurisdiction to
adopt, appropriate controls and interventions to ensure that
inspection-exempt meat and poultry products being produced are safe and
wholesome and that inspected meat and poultry products being handled
and prepared remain safe and wholesome for consumers. Projects may
address State and local retail inspectors' needs for tools to ensure
the safety of meat and poultry processed or handled at retail, reducing
the potential for Listeria monocytogenes contamination of ready-to-eat
meat and poultry products, and ways to leverage current Federal, State,
and local food safety activities to more effectively protect consumers.
4. Applications of new technologies that will permit small and very
small meat, poultry, and egg product establishments to produce safer
products. Projects would assist small and very small plants to adapt
and use new technologies, including interventions, processes, and
systems, to enhance product safety.
5. Enhancement of laboratory testing capability of the Food
Emergency Response Network for microbiological threat agents.
Cooperative agreements will develop programs to assist State and local
laboratories to augment microbiological threat agent testing capacities
and increase the number of member laboratories that are able to perform
threat agent testing for the network. The agreements will enhance
laboratories' ability to analyze for microbiological threat agents
using FERN methods and improve laboratory capacities for surveillance
and outbreak response. The agreements will support training in FERN
threat agent methods and the purchase of supplies and equipment
required by the methods. After training and demonstration of
proficiency, laboratories will participate in validation studies with
various food matrices as well as surveillance activities sponsored by
FERN.
FSIS expects to allocate approximately $2,500,000 to fund
cooperative agreements in these areas this fiscal year. The approximate
amount available for each area, and the range in dollars for proposed
cooperative projects, is provided below. Academic institutions; State,
local and tribal government agencies; and non-profit organizations are
invited to submit brief proposals (one to two pages) for cooperative
agreements in any of the areas described. These proposals will be
reviewed by FSIS. If reviewers find that the proposals would further
the food safety and public health goals of FSIS, are applicable
nationwide to targeted audiences, can be reproduced and disseminated,
and reflect new materials or approaches, submitters will be invited to
further develop the proposals for consideration as cooperative
agreements with FSIS, as funding is available.
Proposals are due June 20, 2005. FSIS will review and respond to
proposals by August 3, 2005. Unlike typical Federal grants, cooperative
agreements involve a Federal agency's active participation with the
cooperator during both project development and project execution. Work
products are intended to be available for public use nationwide. The
criteria used by FSIS to assess proposals are listed for each
cooperative agreement program area. Cooperators whose proposals are
selected for further project development will need to discuss and reach
agreement with FSIS on project details to permit establishment of a
cooperative agreement no later than July 30, 2005.
All proposals should address the following points:
Project description, including specific goals, timeline,
and deliverables
Description of national public benefit expected, including
expected utility of work products, for example, training manuals, CDs,
and videos
[[Page 20519]]
Projected costs, including cooperator contributions
Projected performance measures
Primary contact, principal investigator, and other likely
participants, and
Public domain; work products may be freely reproduced and
distributed by FSIS.
Multi-year projects will be considered, but they are subject to
annual renewal and may be affected by changes in FSIS' annual budget.
The number of projects funded each year is determined by the number of
proposals received, the extent to which they will further the food
safety and public health goals of the Agency, the performance of
ongoing projects, and funding availability.
Proposals are being solicited for fiscal year 2005 for the
following five cooperative agreement program areas:
1. Food animal production, transportation, and marketing
Description: Cooperative agreements will support State-level
partnerships to bring together food animal producers, veterinarians,
Extension specialists, State and Federal animal health officials, and
State and Federal public health officials to provide information and
education to food animal producers. Partnerships will develop and
distribute to producers educational materials that strengthen food
safety through adoption of animal production practices that support
pathogen reduction and residue avoidance in food animals. State food
safety partnerships will provide a continuing non-regulatory
infrastructure for information sharing among all levels of government
and the food animal industries and will enhance and recognize Quality
Assurance Programs (QAP) as a basic element of pre-harvest food safety.
Funding Level: The total level for fiscal year 2005 is
approximately $500,000. Agreements usually will not exceed $50,000.
Evaluation Criteria: Proposals for funding will be ranked in
consideration of certain factors. They are, in order of significance:
Proposal's feasibility and relevance to pre-harvest food
safety
Participation by State animal health or public health
officials
Participation by food animal industry leaders
Special animal health or food safety needs of industry
Demonstrated ability to develop and deliver to producers
information on food safety awareness and safe production practices
Food animal population affected
Cooperator's past performance in animal and egg production
food safety cooperative agreements, and
Geographic distribution of States (need for national
presence).
Submit Proposals to: john.ragan@fsis.usda. Although electronic
submissions are encouraged, proposals also may be mailed to John R.
Ragan, D.V.M., Animal and Egg Production Food Safety Staff, Zoonotic
Diseases and Residue Surveillance Division, Office of Public Health
Science, FSIS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 343 Aerospace
Building, Washington, DC 20250-3700.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John R. Ragan, D.V.M., (202) 690-1277,
or Sibyl Wright, (202) 720-4923, sibyl.wright@fsis.usda.gov, of the
Animal and Egg Production Food Safety Staff.
2. Small and very small inspected meat, poultry or egg product
establishments.
Description: Cooperative agreements will provide outreach to
constituencies involved in FSIS-regulated activities, principally small
and very small establishments and establishments in tribal and other
underserved areas. Projects support training, education, and outreach
that will promote more effective use of HACCP systems, appropriate
responses to emerging food safety and food security concerns,
understanding of the latest information on foodborne illness and
hazards, availability of new procedures and technologies for hazard
avoidance and mitigation, and security guidance.
Funding Level: The total level is approximately $250,000.
Agreements typically range from $10,000 to $30,000. Larger amounts may
be considered for compelling projects.
Evaluation Criteria: Proposals for funding will be ranked in
consideration of certain factors. They are, in order of significance:
Responds to the needs of small and very small plants
Provides for measurable, documented results
Provides a degree of innovation
Assists small and very small plants to maintain effective
HACCP systems, produce safe products, and otherwise comply with Federal
regulations
Provides a deliverable product that can be easily shared
and is applicable to a wide audience. For example, the project will
result in information or materials and be presented in a format that
can be used by FSIS and its partners to improve food safety and impact
public health, and
Cooperator agrees to contribute significant resources to
the project.
Submit Proposals to: kathleen.barrett@fsis.usda.gov. Although
electronic submission is encouraged, proposals also may be mailed to
Kathleen Barrett at Strategic Initiatives, Partnerships and Outreach
Staff, FSIS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 405 Aerospace
Building, Washington, DC 20250.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Barrett, Strategic
Initiatives, Partnerships and Outreach Staff, at (202) 690-6644.
3. Retail stores, food service establishments, and other
inspection-exempt small businesses processing or handling meat,
poultry, and egg products.
Description: Projects will promote adoption of practices by small
businesses, in particular retail and food service establishments, to
reduce or eliminate food safety hazards to foods under their control.
Projects are typically aimed at enhancing State, local, or tribal
government food protection agencies' outreach capabilities and ability
to make measurable improvements in food safety in support of FSIS'
national public health mission and goals.
Funding Level: The total level is $250,000. Agreements typically
range from $20,000 to $50,000. Larger amounts may be considered for
compelling projects.
Evaluation Criteria: Proposals for funding will be ranked in
consideration of certain factors. They are, in order of significance:
Contributes to adoption by firms producing or handling
meat, poultry, and egg products of the best available practices for
controlling food safety hazards in their commercial environment.
Provides State and local food inspectors tools for
ensuring the safety of meat and poultry processed or handled at retail.
Leverages current Federal, State, and local food safety
activities to more effectively protect consumers.
Provides a degree of innovation.
Provides a deliverable product that is transferable; that
is, the project will result in information or materials useful for food
safety in other jurisdictions.
Responds to needs of underserved areas or populations.
Involves collaboration among interested entities; that is,
the project involves industry, academia, Extension, and consumer groups
as well as government agencies (involvement of a state food safety task
force is desirable).
[[Page 20520]]
Cooperator agrees to contribute significant resources to
the project.
Reduces the potential for product contamination, in
particular, Listeria contamination of ready to eat foods.
Submit Proposals to: ralph.stafko@fsis.usda.gov. Although
electronic submissions are encouraged, proposals also may be mailed to
Ralph Stafko, Strategic Initiatives, Partnerships, and Outreach Staff,
FSIS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., 405 Aerospace Building,
Washington, DC 20250.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ralph Stafko, Strategic Initiatives,
Partnership, and Outreach Staff, at (202) 690-6520.
4. New Technology that will permit small and very small meat,
poultry and egg product establishments to produce safer products.
Description: Cooperative agreements will promote new technologies
or new adaptations of technologies, including interventions, processes,
or systems, that will enhance the ability of small and very small
plants to produce safe and wholesome meat, poultry, and egg products.
Funding Level: The total is approximately $500,000. Agreements will
range from $25,000 to $75,000. Larger contract proposal amounts may be
considered for certain projects that address FSIS food safety
priorities.
Evaluation Criteria: Proposals for funding will be ranked in
consideration of certain factors. They are, in order of significance:
Helps small and very small plants meet their HACCP and
food safety requirements.
Helps small and very small plants to understand how to
demonstrate that a new technology complies with Federal inspection
requirements.
Provides a degree of innovation.
Applies new research and technologies that address current
food safety and public health concerns, such as properly handling and
labeling products that contain ingredients that are known allergens.
Provides deliverable products that are easily
transferable, such as videos, training programs, and flow charts. The
project will result in information or materials useful to small and
very small plants to improve food safety.
For example, the subjects of proposals may include:
Antimicrobial or other kinds of interventions to reduce or
eliminate E. coli 0157:H7 in ground meat products.
Listeria monocytogenes post-lethality treatments for
ready-to-eat products.
The relationship between the level of Salmonella
enteritidis in eggs and egg products and the molting of poultry.
The relationship between the level of Salmonella
enteritidis and the temperature at which eggs have been held from the
day of lay until the day of processing.
Salmonella growth and reduction in shelf-stable ready-to-
eat products.
Cost-effective mechanisms to determine the temperature of
products while they are being shipped.
Allergens, food sensitivities, and intolerances in meat
and poultry products; development of a training program for small and
very small plants to help with the reassessment of their HACCP programs
as they pertain to any ingredient that may be an allergen.
Inoculation challenge studies on non-thermally processed
ready-to-eat products; for example, validation studies for dry cured
chorizo, basturma, prosciutto ham, and pancetta.
The amount of pathogen growth, such as E. coli O157:H7 and
Salmonella, on livestock carcasses during the cooling process, and the
development of easily understood predictive microbial models.
The minimum chamber relative humidity needed to ensure
that the moisture level on the product surface is adequate to achieve
the desired lethality without increasing the heat resistance of
bacterial pathogens (for example, Salmonella spp.).
Alternative methods, such as antimicrobial packaging, to
achieve surface lethality for products that had been exposed to the
environment after lethality treatment.
Submit Proposals to: shaukat.syed@fsis.usda.gov. Although
electronic submissions are encouraged, proposals also may be mailed to
Shaukat H. Syed, D.V.M., Director, New Technology Staff, FSIS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 2932, South Building, Washington,
DC 20250.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard L. Early, D.V.M., New
Technology Staff, at (202) 205-0675.
5. Enhancement of laboratory testing capability of the Food
Emergency Response Network for microbiological threat agents.
Description: The Food Emergency Response Network (FERN) is composed
of State and local government regulatory laboratories with varying
capacities to perform the testing of threat agents. Cooperative
agreements will develop programs to assist State and local laboratories
to augment microbiological threat agent testing capacities and increase
the number of member laboratories that are able to perform threat agent
testing for the network. The agreements will enhance laboratories'
ability to analyze for microbiological threat agents using FERN methods
and improve laboratory capacities for surveillance and outbreak
response. The agreements will support training in FERN threat agent
methods and the purchase of supplies and equipment required by the
methods. After training and demonstration of proficiency, laboratories
will participate in validation studies with various food matrices as
well as surveillance activities sponsored by FERN.
Funding Level: The total level is approximately $1,000,000.
Agreements typically range from $50,000 to $100,000.
Evaluation Criteria: Proposals for funding will be ranked in
consideration of certain factors. They are, in order of importance:
Includes provisions for measurable, documented results
that may be shared with State and local laboratories, FSIS, or its
agents.
Provides information useful for the testing of threat
agents in food.
Possesses basic food analytic resources to implement the
agreement.
States' willingness to participate in method validation,
proficiency testing, and surveillance programs.
Submit Proposals to: Wayne Ziemer, FERN, FSIS, 950 College Station
Road, Athens, Georgia 30605; telephone (706) 546-3591; facsimile (706)
546-3518; wayne.ziemer@fsis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frankie J. Beacorn, Biological Food
Security and Emergency Branch, Food Emergency Response Network
Division, FERN, FSIS, USDA, 950 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia
30677; telephone (706) 546-3578; facsimile (706) 546-3518;
frankie.beacorn@fsis.usda.gov.
Additional Public Notification
Public awareness of all segments of rulemaking and policy
development is important. Consequently, in an effort to ensure that the
public and in particular minorities, women, and persons with
disabilities are aware of this notice, FSIS will announce it on-line
through the FSIS Web page located at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
regulations/2005_Notices_Index/.
FSIS also will make copies of this Federal Register publication
available through the FSIS Constituent Update, which is used to provide
information regarding FSIS policies, procedures, regulations, Federal
Register notices, FSIS public meetings, recalls, and other
[[Page 20521]]
types of information that could affect or would be of interest to
constituents and stakeholders. The update is communicated via Listserv,
a free electronic mail subscription service consisting of industry,
trade, and farm groups, consumer interest groups, allied health
professionals, scientific professionals, and other individuals who have
asked to be included. The update is available on the FSIS Web page.
Through Listserv and the Web page, FSIS is able to provide information
to a much broader, more diverse audience.
In addition, FSIS offers an electronic mail subscription service
that provides an automatic and customized notification when popular
pages are updated, including Federal Register publications and related
documents. This service is available at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/news_
and_events/email_subscription/ and allows FSIS customers to sign up
for subscription options across eight categories. Options range from
recalls to export information to regulations, directives, and notices.
Customers can add or delete subscriptions themselves and have the
option to protect their accounts with passwords.
Done at Washington, DC, on April 15, 2005.
Barbara J. Masters,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-7955 Filed 4-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P