Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Cheesequake Creek, NJ, 20464-20466 [05-7896]
Download as PDF
20464
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
MODEL MILESTONES—Continued
[10 CFR Part 2, Subpart N]
• Within 50 days of date of enforcement order:
• Within 30 days of presiding officer decision granting hearing:
• Within 40 days of presiding officer decision granting hearing:
• Within 60 days of presiding officer decision granting hearing:
• Within 30 days of end of evidentiary hearing and closing of record:
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day
of April, 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–7846 Filed 4–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01–04–126]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations:
Cheesequake Creek, NJ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has changed
the drawbridge operation regulations
that govern the operation of the S35
Bridge, mile 0.0, across Cheesequake
Creek at Morgan, South Amboy, New
Jersey. This final rule allows the bridge
to open on the hour only from 7 a.m. to
8 p.m., May 1 through October 31. In
addition, this rule allows the bridge
owner to require a 4-hour advance
notice for openings from 11 p.m. to 7
a.m. all year, and all day from
November 1 through April 30. This rule
is expected to relieve the bridge owner
of the burden of crewing the bridge at
all times while still providing for the
reasonable needs of navigation.
DATES: This rule is effective May 20,
2005.
Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket (CGD01–04–126) and are
available for inspection or copying at
the First Coast Guard District, Bridge
Branch Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue,
Boston, Massachusetts 02110, between 7
ADDRESSES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:52 Apr 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
period may be obtained by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
Mr.
Gary Kassof, Bridge Administrator, First
Coast Guard District, (212) 668–7165.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion of Comments and Changes
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regulatory Information
On December 17, 2004, we published
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation
Regulations; Cheesequake Creek, New
Jersey, in the Federal Register (69 FR
75493). We received no comments in
response to the notice of proposed
rulemaking. No public hearing was
requested and none was held.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
ACTION:
Presiding officer decision on requests for hearing and confirms use of
Subpart N procedures (note: if presiding officer concludes that Subpart N procedures should not be used, the Model Milestone for Enforcement Actions under Subpart G are applicable).
Mandatory disclosures complete.
Prehearing conference to specify issues for hearing and set schedules
for remaining course of proceeding.
Evidentiary hearing begins.
Presiding officer issues initial decision.
Background and Purpose
The S35 Bridge has a vertical
clearance of 25 feet at mean high water
and 30 feet at mean low water in the
closed position. The existing
drawbridge operation regulations listed
at 33 CFR 117.709(a), require the bridge
to open on signal; except that, from May
15 through October 15 from 7 a.m. to 7
p.m., the draw need only open on the
hour. From December 1 through March
31 from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m., the draw need
not be opened for the passage of vessels.
Cheesequake Creek is navigated
predominately by small recreational
vessels between April and November
only. The bridge seldom opens during
the winter months December through
March.
The bridge owner, New Jersey
Department of Transportation (NJDOT),
requested that the drawbridge operation
regulations for the S35 Bridge be
changed to allow the bridge to open on
the hour only from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., May
1 through October 31. The hourly
openings are currently in effect from 7
a.m. to 7 p.m., May 15 through October
15.
In addition, this final rule allows the
bridge owner to require a 4-hour
advance notice for bridge openings from
11 p.m. to 7 a.m. all year round and all
day from November 1 through April 30.
Bridge openings during the on-call time
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Coast Guard received no
comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking and as a result, no
changes have been made to this final
rule.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3), of
that Order. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
that Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under
the regulatory policies and procedures
of the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
This conclusion is based on the fact
that the bridge will continue to open for
vessel traffic during the time periods
vessel traffic has historically required
the bridge to open.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b), that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This conclusion is based on the fact
that the bridge will continue to open for
vessel traffic during the time periods
vessel traffic has historically required
the bridge to open.
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Assistance for Small Entities
Civil Justice Reform
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process.
No small entities requested Coast
Guard assistance and none was given.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:52 Apr 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This final rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20465
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this final rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. It has been determined
that this final rule does not significantly
impact the environment.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulations
For the reasons set out in the preamble,
the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 117
as follows:
I
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106
Stat. 5039.
2. Section 117.709 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
I
§ 117.709
Cheesequake Creek.
(a) The draw of the of the S35 Bridge,
at mile 0.0, at Morgan, South Amboy,
New Jersey, shall operate as follows:
(1) From May 1 through October 31
from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., the draw need
only open on the hour. From 8 p.m. to
11 p.m. the Draw shall open on signal.
From 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. the draw shall
open after at least a 4-hour advance
notice is given by calling the number
posted at the bridge.
(2) From November 1 through April
30 the draw shall open on signal after
at least a 4-hour advance notice is given
by calling the number posted at the
bridge.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: April 11, 2005.
David P. Peskoske,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–7896 Filed 4–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
20466
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Land traffic has been shifted to the
replacement bridge and the drawbridge,
governed by 33 CFR 117.169(c), has
been removed.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
Discussion of Rule
This final rule removes paragraph (c),
regarding the Maxwell Highway
Drawbridge, from section 117.169.
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD 11–05–025]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Napa River, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is removing
the existing drawbridge operation
regulation for the draw of the Maxwell
Highway Bridge, mile 17.6, near Imola,
CA. The drawbridge has been removed
from the waterway. Therefore, the
regulation controlling the operation of
the drawbridge is no longer necessary.
DATES: This rule is effective April 20,
2005.
SUMMARY:
Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of the docket CGD 11–
05–025, and are available for inspection
or copying at the office of the Eleventh
Coast Guard District, Bridge Section,
Building 50–3, Coast Guard Island,
Alameda, CA 94501–5100, between 8
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David H. Sulouff, Chief, Bridge Section,
Eleventh Coast Guard District,
telephone (510) 437–3516.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. The
Maxwell Drawbridge has been removed
and replaced by a fixed, high-level
bridge. Since the drawbridge no longer
exists, the operating schedule in 33 CFR
117.169(c) is no longer needed and is
being removed.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective in less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register, because, as explained above, it
eliminates the governing regulation at
33 CFR 117.169(c) for a drawbridge that
has been removed from the waterway.
Background and Purpose
On February 4, 2002 the Coast Guard
issued a permit for a fixed, high-level
bridge to replace the Maxwell Highway
drawbridge, mile 17.6, near Imola, CA.
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:52 Apr 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
A special operating regulation exists
for this drawbridge. This drawbridge
has been removed from the waterway,
making the regulation unnecessary. We
expect the economic impact of this rule
to be so minimal that a full Regulatory
Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule, to remove an obsolete
drawbridge regulation, will have no
impact on any small entities.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in the
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not cause an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 20, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20464-20466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7896]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01-04-126]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Cheesequake Creek, NJ
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has changed the drawbridge operation
regulations that govern the operation of the S35 Bridge, mile 0.0,
across Cheesequake Creek at Morgan, South Amboy, New Jersey. This final
rule allows the bridge to open on the hour only from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m.,
May 1 through October 31. In addition, this rule allows the bridge
owner to require a 4-hour advance notice for openings from 11 p.m. to 7
a.m. all year, and all day from November 1 through April 30. This rule
is expected to relieve the bridge owner of the burden of crewing the
bridge at all times while still providing for the reasonable needs of
navigation.
DATES: This rule is effective May 20, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket (CGD01-04-126) and are available for inspection or
copying at the First Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch Office, 408
Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, between 7 a.m. and 3
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gary Kassof, Bridge Administrator,
First Coast Guard District, (212) 668-7165.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On December 17, 2004, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Cheesequake Creek,
New Jersey, in the Federal Register (69 FR 75493). We received no
comments in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking. No public
hearing was requested and none was held.
Background and Purpose
The S35 Bridge has a vertical clearance of 25 feet at mean high
water and 30 feet at mean low water in the closed position. The
existing drawbridge operation regulations listed at 33 CFR 117.709(a),
require the bridge to open on signal; except that, from May 15 through
October 15 from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., the draw need only open on the hour.
From December 1 through March 31 from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m., the draw need
not be opened for the passage of vessels.
Cheesequake Creek is navigated predominately by small recreational
vessels between April and November only. The bridge seldom opens during
the winter months December through March.
The bridge owner, New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT),
requested that the drawbridge operation regulations for the S35 Bridge
be changed to allow the bridge to open on the hour only from 7 a.m. to
8 p.m., May 1 through October 31. The hourly openings are currently in
effect from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., May 15 through October 15.
In addition, this final rule allows the bridge owner to require a
4-hour advance notice for bridge openings from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. all
year round and all day from November 1 through April 30. Bridge
openings during the on-call time period may be obtained by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking and as a result, no changes have been made to this
final rule.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3), of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will continue
to open for vessel traffic during the time periods vessel traffic has
historically required the bridge to open.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will continue
to open for vessel traffic during the time periods vessel traffic has
historically required the bridge to open.
[[Page 20465]]
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
No small entities requested Coast Guard assistance and none was
given.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one
year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This final rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have substantial direct effect on one
or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this final rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. It has been determined that this final
rule does not significantly impact the environment.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulations
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR
part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.
0
2. Section 117.709 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 117.709 Cheesequake Creek.
(a) The draw of the of the S35 Bridge, at mile 0.0, at Morgan,
South Amboy, New Jersey, shall operate as follows:
(1) From May 1 through October 31 from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., the draw
need only open on the hour. From 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. the Draw shall open
on signal. From 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. the draw shall open after at least a
4-hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the
bridge.
(2) From November 1 through April 30 the draw shall open on signal
after at least a 4-hour advance notice is given by calling the number
posted at the bridge.
* * * * *
Dated: April 11, 2005.
David P. Peskoske,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05-7896 Filed 4-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P