Proposed Voluntary Guidance on Implementation of Statewide Voter Registration Lists, 20114-20116 [05-7713]

Download as PDF 20114 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 73 / Monday, April 18, 2005 / Notices northwest of Bethel, in the YukonKuskokwim Delta region of Western Alaska. The north, east, and south boundaries of the community are contiguous with the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge. The Newtok community is approximately 735 feet to the south of the encroaching Ninglick River, which is eroding toward the village at an average rate of 64 feet per year. Thermal degradation of the riverbank is causing shoreline sloughing. A typical soil profile has deep-frozen silts layered with peat at the surface. Permafrost continuously underlies a 2foot active layer (sometimes thicker when a greater layer of peat is present). The shoreline is highly vulnerable to flooding, especially during spring ice jams in the river or during severe westerly windstorms on the Bering Sea. The programmatic DEIS will determine whether Federal action is warranted and will define alternative actions for Congressional consideration. Site specific alternatives will be addressed in more detail in a second tier of the EIS process. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lizette Boyer (907) 753–2637, Alaska District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Resources Section (CEPOA–EN–CW–ER), P.O. Box 6898, Elmendorf AFB, AK 99506–0898. Email: Lizette.P.Boyer@poa02.usace.army.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This study is authorized under section 203, 33 U.S.C. Tribal Partnership Program. The community of Newtok has existed on the present town site since 1949 when they moved from Old Kealavik, 3 miles away. The people of Newtok share a strong cultural heritage with the Nelson Island communities; their ancestors have lived on the Bering Sea coast for at least 2,000 years. Relative isolation from outside influences has enabled the area to retain its traditions and customs. The programmatic DEIS will consider various erosion protection alternatives, including relocation of the community and construction of erosion protection structures in Newtok to prevent land and property losses. The feasibility of extensive bank protection will be analyzed and compared with relocation alternatives. Relocation would mean the abandonment of the Newtok community town site near the river. Relocation alternatives include moving the people of Newtok to a larger hub community such as Bethel where they would be incorporated into the fabric of that community; moving the population to a smaller, closer community such as one of the three existing communities on VerDate jul<14>2003 16:08 Apr 15, 2005 Jkt 205001 Neslon Island (Toksook, Nightmure or Tununak), which would involve developing additional or shared infrastructure in those locations, or constructing a new town at a site on the north end of Nelson Island called Takikchak. The community is intent on relocating to Takikchak. The Newtok Native Corporation owns the Takikchak townsite. A portion of the land was conveyed to the Newtok Native Corporation from the Yukon Delta Fish and Wildlife Refuge in 2003 in accordance with Pub. L. 108–129. The Nelson Island area is within their traditional subsistence corridors. Issues: The programmatic DEIS will consider the need of Newtok to preserve its community identity and the potential impacts of the alternatives on the cultural resources and infrastructure of the community. In addition, the programmatic DEIS will address the importance of maintaining the community’s traditional subsistence lifestyles, while providing modern infrastructure and housing. Issues associated with relocation to an existing community include property and business losses, impacts of social/ cultural changes, and impacts on the infrastructure capacity of the receiving location. Issues associated with relocation and construction of a new townsite include engineering constructability criteria and environmental suitability. Constructability criteria include geologic stability, availability of fill material, and potable water sources. Environmental issues include effects to endangered species and wildlife habitat, and justifiable and practicable mitigation measures. Other resources and concerns will be identified through scoping, public involvement, and interagency coordination. Scoping. A copy of this notice and additional public information will be sent to interested parties to initiate scoping. All parties are invited to participate in the scoping process by identifying any additional concerns, issues, studies, and alternatives that should be considered. A scoping meeting will be held in Newtok, Alaska, in summer 2005 at a place and time to be announced. The programmatic DEIS is scheduled for releast in 2007. Guy R. McConnell, Chief, Environmental Resources Section. [FR Doc. 05–7607 Filed 4–15–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3710–NL–M PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION Proposed Voluntary Guidance on Implementation of Statewide Voter Registration Lists United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC). ACTION: Notice; proposed guidance and request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The EAC is proposing voluntary policy guidance on the interpretation of section 303(a) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA). HAVA was enacted to set standards for the administration of Federal elections. Included in the new standards is a requirement that each State develop and maintain a single, statewide list of registered voters. The voluntary guidance proposed by EAC will assist the States in understanding and interpreting HAVA’s standards regarding statewide voter registration lists. DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on this draft guidance on or before 5 p.m. e.d.t. on May 25, 2005. ADDRESSES: Send comments to Juliet Thompson, General Counsel, via mail to U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Avenue, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20005; via fax to 202– 566–1392; or via e-mail to guidance@eac.gov. An electronic copy of the proposed guidance may be found on the EAC’s Web site: https:// www.eac.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juliet Thompson, General Counsel, Washington, DC, (202) 566–3100, Fax: (202) 566–1392. Proposed Voluntary Guidance on Implementation of Statewide Voter Registration Lists I. Introduction The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) requires the Chief Election Official in each State to implement a ‘‘single, uniform, official, centralized, interactive computerized statewide voter registration list.’’ That list is to be ‘‘defined, maintained, and administered at the State level’’ and must contain the ‘‘name and registration information of every legally registered voter in the State.’’ The details of implementing these statewide voter registration lists were left to the States. However, Congress authorized the United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to issue voluntary guidance to assist the States with interpreting and implementing the provisions of HAVA as they relate to the requirement for a statewide voter E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM 18APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 73 / Monday, April 18, 2005 / Notices registration list. It is important to note, however, that the EAC does not have legal authority to interpret HAVA beyond providing voluntary guidance in assisting States and local governments to meet the requirements of HAVA. The civil enforcement of Title III of HAVA is expressly assigned to the United States Department of Justice (DOJ). Although it is clear that a single, uniform, official, centralized, interactive computerized voter registration list is one that is technically and functionally able to perform tasks described in sections 303(a)(1)(A)(i) through 303(a)(1)(A)(vii) of HAVA, clarification is needed as to how and to what extent each of these functions must be accomplished by the statewide voter registration list. The following is interpretative guidance that clarifies the meaning of certain portions of section 303(a) of HAVA (42 U.S.C. 15483(a)). The guidance also serves to encourage state and local election officials to work together to define and assume their appropriate responsibilities for meeting this HAVA requirement, as well as to engage other relevant stakeholders in this process. The guidance set forth below as developed by the EAC through a process which involved holding a public meeting regarding the statewide voter registration lists as well as convening a working group of state and local election officials to assist with identifying the issues and solutions involved with implementing a statewide voter registration list. EAC held a public meeting wherein it received testimony from four state election officials whose states have implemented statewide voter registration lists, either prior to or since the passage of HAVA. Subsequently, EAC, assisted by the National Academies, convened a two-day working group meeting wherein state and local election officials discussed issues that persist in the implementation of this HAVA requirement. The working group received technical assistance from technology experts invited by the Academies and representatives of the country’s motor vehicle administrators. EAC used these discussions as a basis for developing the guidance that is presented below. The following guidance on statewide voter registration lists is restricted to issues of policy related to the development and implementation of a single, uniform, official, centralized interactive computerized statewide voter registration list. EAC and the working group of state and local election officials will continue to explore technical issues related to the VerDate jul<14>2003 16:08 Apr 15, 2005 Jkt 205001 maintenance and upgrade of these database systems, with assistance from the National Academies. Additional guidance and/or best practices related to these technology issues will be developed, presented for comment, and adopted in the coming months. II. Scope and Definitions 1. Is guidance regarding statewide voter registration lists or Section 303(a) of HAVA mandatory? No. The guidance issued here by EAC is voluntary. States can choose to adopt this guidance as interpretative of HAVA’s requirement for a statewide voter registration list. 2. Who would benefit from this guidance? This guidance is targeted to assist the States and local governments in fulfilling their requirements under Section 303(a) of HAVA. This guidance may help election officials understand HAVA’s intent to comprise a single, uniform statewide voter registration list and the responsibilities that HAVA places on all election officials to assure that the names and information contained in the statewide voter registration list are accurate. 3. To whom is Section 303(a) of HAVA applicable? The provisions of Section 303(a) apply to all States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, and the United States Virgin Islands except those that on or after the date of enactment of HAVA had no requirement for registration of voters with respect to elections for Federal office. Currently, only North Dakota has no voter registration requirement. 4. Does this guidance in any way alter, interpret, or effect the requirements of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993? No. Nothing in this guidance should be construed to alter, interpret or effect, in any way whatsoever, the requirements of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, including requirements and timeframes with respect to the administration of voter registration and/or the process States must follow in removing names of registrants from the voting rolls. 5. Who is a local election official? A local election official is the person or persons who have primary legal responsibility for determining the eligibility of an individual to vote and maintaining and updating the voter registration information of eligible PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 20115 voters in his/her voter registration jurisdiction. 6. Who is responsible for implementing the provisions of Section 303(a) of HAVA? The State through the State’s Chief Election Official is responsible for ensuring that the State has a single, uniform, official, centralized, interactive computerized statewide voter registration list. However, local election officials also have certain responsibilities outlined in Section 303(a) of HAVA, particularly with regard to entering voter registration information into the statewide voter registration list on an expedited basis. 7. What is the official list of voters pursuant to Section 303(a) of HAVA? The official list is the list defined, maintained and administered by the State through the State’s Chief Election Official. III. Guidance on Statewide Voter Registration Lists 8. What types of databases meet the requirements of HAVA to generate a single, uniform voter registration list? HAVA requires State and local election officials to use and access the same statewide voter registration list for purposes of conducting voter registration and voting in an election for Federal office. While databases hosted on a single, central platform (e.g., mainframe and/or client servers) are most closely akin to the requirements of HAVE, a database which gathers its information from local voter registration databases or servers may also meet the single, uniform list requirement as long as the statewide voter registration list is defined, maintained and administered by the State (e.g., the State establishes uniform software for use by all local databases) and the statewide voter registration list contains the name and registration information of every legally registered voter in the State with a unique identifier (i.e., the last four digits of a Social Security Number, driver’s license number, or a unique number assigned by the election official). 9. How frequently must the statewide voter registration list be synchronized with any local databases to assure that the statewide voter registration list is the single source for the names and registration information of all legally registered voters in the State? At a minimum, the statewide voter registration list should be synchronized with local voter registration databases at least once every 24 hours to assure that the statewide voter registration list E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM 18APN1 20116 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 73 / Monday, April 18, 2005 / Notices contains the names and registration information for all legally registered voters in the State and that local election officials throughout the State have immediate electronic access to such information, as appropriate. 10. How should the statewide voter registration list be coordinated with other agency databases? [Docket No. EA–302] 11. Who should have immediate electronic access to the statewide voter registration list? At a minimum, local election officials must have immediate electronic access to the statewide voter registration list. This means that the local official must have access through some electronic connection to the official statewide voter registration list when needed to process voter registrations, assist voters, input or change data, or determine eligibility of an individual to vote. The level of access given to each user should be appropriate to the function of the user and should be established collaboratively by the State and local election officials. However, all voter registration information obtained by any local election official must be electronically entered into the statewide voter registration list on an expedited basis at the time the information is provided to the local official. 16:08 Apr 15, 2005 Jkt 205001 BILLING CODE 6820–YN–M DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HAVA makes accurate voter registration lists a priority. States should coordinate the statewide voter registration list with other state agency databases (e.g., voter registration agencies as defined by NVRA) that may contain information relevant to the statewide voter registration list. Additionally, coordination between the statewide voter registration list and other government sources of information (e.g., death and felony records) is equally critical. States should take steps to provide for regular coordination of their statewide voter registration lists with death and felony records so as to assure that the statewide voter registration list is current. Moreover, section 303(a) of HAVA requires States to match information received on voter registration forms against drivers license and social security databases for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of the information received from all new voter registrants. Under Section 303(b), such validation provides an exemption to the voter identification requirements for first-time registrants by mail if the information matches. VerDate jul<14>2003 Dated: April 12, 2005. Gracia Hillman, Chair, Election Assistance Commission. [FR Doc. 05–7713 Filed 4–15–05; 8:45 am] Application To Export Electric Energy; Duke Energy Marketing America, L.L.C. Office of Fossil Energy, DOE. Notice of application. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: Duke Energy Marketing America, L.L.C. (DEMA) has applied for authority to transmit electric energy from the United States to Canada pursuant to section 202(e) of the Federal Power Act. DATES: Comments, protests or requests to intervene must be submitted on or before May 18, 2005. ADDRESSES: Comments, protests or requests to intervene should be addressed as follows: Office of Coal & Power Systems (FE–27), Office of Fossil Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–0350 (FAX 202– 287–5736). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Xavier Puslowski (Program Office) 202– 586–4708 or Michael Skinker (Program Attorney) 202–586–2793. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Exports of electricity from the United States to a foreign country are regulated and require authorization under section 202(e) of the Federal Power Act (FPA) (16 U.S.C. 824a(e)). On March 23, 2005, the Office of Fossil Energy (FE) of the Department of Energy (DOE) received an application from DEMA to transmit electric energy from the United States to Canada. DEMA is wholly owned by Duke Energy North America, LLC (a subsidiary of Duke Energy Corporation). DEMA does not own, operate or control any electric power generation, transmission or distribution facilities. DEMA has requested an electricity export authorization with a 5-year term. The electric energy which DEMA proposes to export to Canada would be purchased from electric utilities and Federal power marketing agencies within the U.S. DEMA proposes to arrange for the delivery of electric energy to Canada over the existing international transmission facilities owned by Basin Electric Power Cooperative, Bonneville Power Administration, Eastern Maine Electric Cooperative, International PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Transmission Company, Joint Owners of the Highgate Project, Long Sault, Inc., Maine Electric Power Company, Maine Public Service Company, Minnesota Power Inc., Minnkota Power Cooperative, New York Power Authority, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Northern States Power/ Excel, Vermont Electric Power Company and Vermont Electric Transmission Company. The construction, operation, maintenance, and connection of each of the international transmission facilities to be utilized by DEMA, as more fully described in the application, has previously been authorized by a Presidential permit issued pursuant to Executive Order 10485, as amended. Procedural Matters: Any person desiring to become a party to this proceeding or to be heard by filing comments or protests to this application should file a petition to intervene, comment or protest at the address provided above in accordance with §§ 385.211 or 385.214 of the FERC’s Rules of Practice and Procedures (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Fifteen copies of each petition and protest should be filed with DOE on or before the date listed above. Comments on the DEMA application to export electric energy to Canada should be clearly marked with Docket EA–302. Additional copies are to be filed directly with Gordon J. Smith, John & Hengerer, 1200 17th Street, NW., Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036–3013 and David W. Wright, Duke Energy Marketing America, L.L.C., 5400 Westheimer Ct., Houston, Texas 77056. A final decision will be made on this application after the environmental impacts have been evaluated pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and a determination is made by the DOE that the proposed action will not adversely impact on the reliability of the U.S. electric power supply system. Copies of this application will be made available, upon request, for public inspection and copying at the address provided above or by accessing the Fossil Energy Home page at https:// www.fe.de.gov. Upon reaching the Fossil Energy home page, select ‘‘Electricity Regulation,’’ and then ‘‘Pending Procedures’’ from the options menus. Issued in Washington, DC, on April 12, 2005. Anthony J. Como, Deputy Director, Electric Power Regulation, Office of Fossil Energy. [FR Doc. 05–7693 Filed 4–15–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM 18APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 73 (Monday, April 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20114-20116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7713]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Proposed Voluntary Guidance on Implementation of Statewide Voter 
Registration Lists

AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC).

ACTION: Notice; proposed guidance and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EAC is proposing voluntary policy guidance on the 
interpretation of section 303(a) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 
(HAVA). HAVA was enacted to set standards for the administration of 
Federal elections. Included in the new standards is a requirement that 
each State develop and maintain a single, statewide list of registered 
voters. The voluntary guidance proposed by EAC will assist the States 
in understanding and interpreting HAVA's standards regarding statewide 
voter registration lists.

DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on this draft guidance on 
or before 5 p.m. e.d.t. on May 25, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Juliet Thompson, General Counsel, via mail 
to U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Avenue, Suite 
1100, Washington, DC 20005; via fax to 202-566-1392; or via e-mail to 
guidance@eac.gov. An electronic copy of the proposed guidance may be 
found on the EAC's Web site: https://www.eac.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juliet Thompson, General Counsel, 
Washington, DC, (202) 566-3100, Fax: (202) 566-1392.

Proposed Voluntary Guidance on Implementation of Statewide Voter 
Registration Lists

I. Introduction

    The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) requires the Chief 
Election Official in each State to implement a ``single, uniform, 
official, centralized, interactive computerized statewide voter 
registration list.'' That list is to be ``defined, maintained, and 
administered at the State level'' and must contain the ``name and 
registration information of every legally registered voter in the 
State.''
    The details of implementing these statewide voter registration 
lists were left to the States. However, Congress authorized the United 
States Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to issue voluntary guidance 
to assist the States with interpreting and implementing the provisions 
of HAVA as they relate to the requirement for a statewide voter

[[Page 20115]]

registration list. It is important to note, however, that the EAC does 
not have legal authority to interpret HAVA beyond providing voluntary 
guidance in assisting States and local governments to meet the 
requirements of HAVA. The civil enforcement of Title III of HAVA is 
expressly assigned to the United States Department of Justice (DOJ).
    Although it is clear that a single, uniform, official, centralized, 
interactive computerized voter registration list is one that is 
technically and functionally able to perform tasks described in 
sections 303(a)(1)(A)(i) through 303(a)(1)(A)(vii) of HAVA, 
clarification is needed as to how and to what extent each of these 
functions must be accomplished by the statewide voter registration 
list. The following is interpretative guidance that clarifies the 
meaning of certain portions of section 303(a) of HAVA (42 U.S.C. 
15483(a)).
    The guidance also serves to encourage state and local election 
officials to work together to define and assume their appropriate 
responsibilities for meeting this HAVA requirement, as well as to 
engage other relevant stakeholders in this process.
    The guidance set forth below as developed by the EAC through a 
process which involved holding a public meeting regarding the statewide 
voter registration lists as well as convening a working group of state 
and local election officials to assist with identifying the issues and 
solutions involved with implementing a statewide voter registration 
list. EAC held a public meeting wherein it received testimony from four 
state election officials whose states have implemented statewide voter 
registration lists, either prior to or since the passage of HAVA. 
Subsequently, EAC, assisted by the National Academies, convened a two-
day working group meeting wherein state and local election officials 
discussed issues that persist in the implementation of this HAVA 
requirement. The working group received technical assistance from 
technology experts invited by the Academies and representatives of the 
country's motor vehicle administrators. EAC used these discussions as a 
basis for developing the guidance that is presented below.
    The following guidance on statewide voter registration lists is 
restricted to issues of policy related to the development and 
implementation of a single, uniform, official, centralized interactive 
computerized statewide voter registration list. EAC and the working 
group of state and local election officials will continue to explore 
technical issues related to the maintenance and upgrade of these 
database systems, with assistance from the National Academies. 
Additional guidance and/or best practices related to these technology 
issues will be developed, presented for comment, and adopted in the 
coming months.

II. Scope and Definitions

1. Is guidance regarding statewide voter registration lists or Section 
303(a) of HAVA mandatory?
    No. The guidance issued here by EAC is voluntary. States can choose 
to adopt this guidance as interpretative of HAVA's requirement for a 
statewide voter registration list.
2. Who would benefit from this guidance?
    This guidance is targeted to assist the States and local 
governments in fulfilling their requirements under Section 303(a) of 
HAVA. This guidance may help election officials understand HAVA's 
intent to comprise a single, uniform statewide voter registration list 
and the responsibilities that HAVA places on all election officials to 
assure that the names and information contained in the statewide voter 
registration list are accurate.
3. To whom is Section 303(a) of HAVA applicable?
    The provisions of Section 303(a) apply to all States, the District 
of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, and 
the United States Virgin Islands except those that on or after the date 
of enactment of HAVA had no requirement for registration of voters with 
respect to elections for Federal office. Currently, only North Dakota 
has no voter registration requirement.
4. Does this guidance in any way alter, interpret, or effect the 
requirements of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993?
    No. Nothing in this guidance should be construed to alter, 
interpret or effect, in any way whatsoever, the requirements of the 
National Voter Registration Act of 1993, including requirements and 
timeframes with respect to the administration of voter registration 
and/or the process States must follow in removing names of registrants 
from the voting rolls.
5. Who is a local election official?
    A local election official is the person or persons who have primary 
legal responsibility for determining the eligibility of an individual 
to vote and maintaining and updating the voter registration information 
of eligible voters in his/her voter registration jurisdiction.
6. Who is responsible for implementing the provisions of Section 303(a) 
of HAVA?
    The State through the State's Chief Election Official is 
responsible for ensuring that the State has a single, uniform, 
official, centralized, interactive computerized statewide voter 
registration list. However, local election officials also have certain 
responsibilities outlined in Section 303(a) of HAVA, particularly with 
regard to entering voter registration information into the statewide 
voter registration list on an expedited basis.
7. What is the official list of voters pursuant to Section 303(a) of 
HAVA?
    The official list is the list defined, maintained and administered 
by the State through the State's Chief Election Official.

III. Guidance on Statewide Voter Registration Lists

8. What types of databases meet the requirements of HAVA to generate a 
single, uniform voter registration list?
    HAVA requires State and local election officials to use and access 
the same statewide voter registration list for purposes of conducting 
voter registration and voting in an election for Federal office. While 
databases hosted on a single, central platform (e.g., mainframe and/or 
client servers) are most closely akin to the requirements of HAVE, a 
database which gathers its information from local voter registration 
databases or servers may also meet the single, uniform list requirement 
as long as the statewide voter registration list is defined, maintained 
and administered by the State (e.g., the State establishes uniform 
software for use by all local databases) and the statewide voter 
registration list contains the name and registration information of 
every legally registered voter in the State with a unique identifier 
(i.e., the last four digits of a Social Security Number, driver's 
license number, or a unique number assigned by the election official).
9. How frequently must the statewide voter registration list be 
synchronized with any local databases to assure that the statewide 
voter registration list is the single source for the names and 
registration information of all legally registered voters in the State?
    At a minimum, the statewide voter registration list should be 
synchronized with local voter registration databases at least once 
every 24 hours to assure that the statewide voter registration list

[[Page 20116]]

contains the names and registration information for all legally 
registered voters in the State and that local election officials 
throughout the State have immediate electronic access to such 
information, as appropriate.
10. How should the statewide voter registration list be coordinated 
with other agency databases?
    HAVA makes accurate voter registration lists a priority. States 
should coordinate the statewide voter registration list with other 
state agency databases (e.g., voter registration agencies as defined by 
NVRA) that may contain information relevant to the statewide voter 
registration list.
    Additionally, coordination between the statewide voter registration 
list and other government sources of information (e.g., death and 
felony records) is equally critical. States should take steps to 
provide for regular coordination of their statewide voter registration 
lists with death and felony records so as to assure that the statewide 
voter registration list is current.
    Moreover, section 303(a) of HAVA requires States to match 
information received on voter registration forms against drivers 
license and social security databases for the purpose of verifying the 
accuracy of the information received from all new voter registrants. 
Under Section 303(b), such validation provides an exemption to the 
voter identification requirements for first-time registrants by mail if 
the information matches.
11. Who should have immediate electronic access to the statewide voter 
registration list?
    At a minimum, local election officials must have immediate 
electronic access to the statewide voter registration list. This means 
that the local official must have access through some electronic 
connection to the official statewide voter registration list when 
needed to process voter registrations, assist voters, input or change 
data, or determine eligibility of an individual to vote. The level of 
access given to each user should be appropriate to the function of the 
user and should be established collaboratively by the State and local 
election officials. However, all voter registration information 
obtained by any local election official must be electronically entered 
into the statewide voter registration list on an expedited basis at the 
time the information is provided to the local official.

    Dated: April 12, 2005.
Gracia Hillman,
Chair, Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-7713 Filed 4-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-YN-M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.