Proposed Voluntary Guidance on Implementation of Statewide Voter Registration Lists, 20114-20116 [05-7713]
Download as PDF
20114
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 73 / Monday, April 18, 2005 / Notices
northwest of Bethel, in the YukonKuskokwim Delta region of Western
Alaska. The north, east, and south
boundaries of the community are
contiguous with the Yukon Delta
National Wildlife Refuge.
The Newtok community is
approximately 735 feet to the south of
the encroaching Ninglick River, which
is eroding toward the village at an
average rate of 64 feet per year. Thermal
degradation of the riverbank is causing
shoreline sloughing.
A typical soil profile has deep-frozen
silts layered with peat at the surface.
Permafrost continuously underlies a 2foot active layer (sometimes thicker
when a greater layer of peat is present).
The shoreline is highly vulnerable to
flooding, especially during spring ice
jams in the river or during severe
westerly windstorms on the Bering Sea.
The programmatic DEIS will
determine whether Federal action is
warranted and will define alternative
actions for Congressional consideration.
Site specific alternatives will be
addressed in more detail in a second tier
of the EIS process.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lizette Boyer (907) 753–2637, Alaska
District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Environmental Resources Section
(CEPOA–EN–CW–ER), P.O. Box 6898,
Elmendorf AFB, AK 99506–0898. Email:
Lizette.P.Boyer@poa02.usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This study
is authorized under section 203, 33
U.S.C. Tribal Partnership Program. The
community of Newtok has existed on
the present town site since 1949 when
they moved from Old Kealavik, 3 miles
away. The people of Newtok share a
strong cultural heritage with the Nelson
Island communities; their ancestors
have lived on the Bering Sea coast for
at least 2,000 years. Relative isolation
from outside influences has enabled the
area to retain its traditions and customs.
The programmatic DEIS will consider
various erosion protection alternatives,
including relocation of the community
and construction of erosion protection
structures in Newtok to prevent land
and property losses. The feasibility of
extensive bank protection will be
analyzed and compared with relocation
alternatives. Relocation would mean the
abandonment of the Newtok community
town site near the river. Relocation
alternatives include moving the people
of Newtok to a larger hub community
such as Bethel where they would be
incorporated into the fabric of that
community; moving the population to a
smaller, closer community such as one
of the three existing communities on
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:08 Apr 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
Neslon Island (Toksook, Nightmure or
Tununak), which would involve
developing additional or shared
infrastructure in those locations, or
constructing a new town at a site on the
north end of Nelson Island called
Takikchak. The community is intent on
relocating to Takikchak. The Newtok
Native Corporation owns the Takikchak
townsite. A portion of the land was
conveyed to the Newtok Native
Corporation from the Yukon Delta Fish
and Wildlife Refuge in 2003 in
accordance with Pub. L. 108–129. The
Nelson Island area is within their
traditional subsistence corridors.
Issues: The programmatic DEIS will
consider the need of Newtok to preserve
its community identity and the potential
impacts of the alternatives on the
cultural resources and infrastructure of
the community. In addition, the
programmatic DEIS will address the
importance of maintaining the
community’s traditional subsistence
lifestyles, while providing modern
infrastructure and housing. Issues
associated with relocation to an existing
community include property and
business losses, impacts of social/
cultural changes, and impacts on the
infrastructure capacity of the receiving
location. Issues associated with
relocation and construction of a new
townsite include engineering
constructability criteria and
environmental suitability.
Constructability criteria include
geologic stability, availability of fill
material, and potable water sources.
Environmental issues include effects to
endangered species and wildlife habitat,
and justifiable and practicable
mitigation measures. Other resources
and concerns will be identified through
scoping, public involvement, and
interagency coordination.
Scoping. A copy of this notice and
additional public information will be
sent to interested parties to initiate
scoping. All parties are invited to
participate in the scoping process by
identifying any additional concerns,
issues, studies, and alternatives that
should be considered. A scoping
meeting will be held in Newtok, Alaska,
in summer 2005 at a place and time to
be announced. The programmatic DEIS
is scheduled for releast in 2007.
Guy R. McConnell,
Chief, Environmental Resources Section.
[FR Doc. 05–7607 Filed 4–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–NL–M
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Proposed Voluntary Guidance on
Implementation of Statewide Voter
Registration Lists
United States Election
Assistance Commission (EAC).
ACTION: Notice; proposed guidance and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EAC is proposing
voluntary policy guidance on the
interpretation of section 303(a) of the
Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA).
HAVA was enacted to set standards for
the administration of Federal elections.
Included in the new standards is a
requirement that each State develop and
maintain a single, statewide list of
registered voters. The voluntary
guidance proposed by EAC will assist
the States in understanding and
interpreting HAVA’s standards
regarding statewide voter registration
lists.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on this draft guidance on or
before 5 p.m. e.d.t. on May 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Juliet
Thompson, General Counsel, via mail to
U.S. Election Assistance Commission,
1225 New York Avenue, Suite 1100,
Washington, DC 20005; via fax to 202–
566–1392; or via e-mail to
guidance@eac.gov. An electronic copy
of the proposed guidance may be found
on the EAC’s Web site: https://
www.eac.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Juliet Thompson, General Counsel,
Washington, DC, (202) 566–3100, Fax:
(202) 566–1392.
Proposed Voluntary Guidance on
Implementation of Statewide Voter
Registration Lists
I. Introduction
The Help America Vote Act of 2002
(HAVA) requires the Chief Election
Official in each State to implement a
‘‘single, uniform, official, centralized,
interactive computerized statewide
voter registration list.’’ That list is to be
‘‘defined, maintained, and administered
at the State level’’ and must contain the
‘‘name and registration information of
every legally registered voter in the
State.’’
The details of implementing these
statewide voter registration lists were
left to the States. However, Congress
authorized the United States Election
Assistance Commission (EAC) to issue
voluntary guidance to assist the States
with interpreting and implementing the
provisions of HAVA as they relate to the
requirement for a statewide voter
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 73 / Monday, April 18, 2005 / Notices
registration list. It is important to note,
however, that the EAC does not have
legal authority to interpret HAVA
beyond providing voluntary guidance in
assisting States and local governments
to meet the requirements of HAVA. The
civil enforcement of Title III of HAVA
is expressly assigned to the United
States Department of Justice (DOJ).
Although it is clear that a single,
uniform, official, centralized, interactive
computerized voter registration list is
one that is technically and functionally
able to perform tasks described in
sections 303(a)(1)(A)(i) through
303(a)(1)(A)(vii) of HAVA, clarification
is needed as to how and to what extent
each of these functions must be
accomplished by the statewide voter
registration list. The following is
interpretative guidance that clarifies the
meaning of certain portions of section
303(a) of HAVA (42 U.S.C. 15483(a)).
The guidance also serves to encourage
state and local election officials to work
together to define and assume their
appropriate responsibilities for meeting
this HAVA requirement, as well as to
engage other relevant stakeholders in
this process.
The guidance set forth below as
developed by the EAC through a process
which involved holding a public
meeting regarding the statewide voter
registration lists as well as convening a
working group of state and local
election officials to assist with
identifying the issues and solutions
involved with implementing a statewide
voter registration list. EAC held a public
meeting wherein it received testimony
from four state election officials whose
states have implemented statewide voter
registration lists, either prior to or since
the passage of HAVA. Subsequently,
EAC, assisted by the National
Academies, convened a two-day
working group meeting wherein state
and local election officials discussed
issues that persist in the
implementation of this HAVA
requirement. The working group
received technical assistance from
technology experts invited by the
Academies and representatives of the
country’s motor vehicle administrators.
EAC used these discussions as a basis
for developing the guidance that is
presented below.
The following guidance on statewide
voter registration lists is restricted to
issues of policy related to the
development and implementation of a
single, uniform, official, centralized
interactive computerized statewide
voter registration list. EAC and the
working group of state and local
election officials will continue to
explore technical issues related to the
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:08 Apr 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
maintenance and upgrade of these
database systems, with assistance from
the National Academies. Additional
guidance and/or best practices related to
these technology issues will be
developed, presented for comment, and
adopted in the coming months.
II. Scope and Definitions
1. Is guidance regarding statewide voter
registration lists or Section 303(a) of
HAVA mandatory?
No. The guidance issued here by EAC
is voluntary. States can choose to adopt
this guidance as interpretative of
HAVA’s requirement for a statewide
voter registration list.
2. Who would benefit from this
guidance?
This guidance is targeted to assist the
States and local governments in
fulfilling their requirements under
Section 303(a) of HAVA. This guidance
may help election officials understand
HAVA’s intent to comprise a single,
uniform statewide voter registration list
and the responsibilities that HAVA
places on all election officials to assure
that the names and information
contained in the statewide voter
registration list are accurate.
3. To whom is Section 303(a) of HAVA
applicable?
The provisions of Section 303(a)
apply to all States, the District of
Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, Guam, American Samoa, and the
United States Virgin Islands except
those that on or after the date of
enactment of HAVA had no requirement
for registration of voters with respect to
elections for Federal office. Currently,
only North Dakota has no voter
registration requirement.
4. Does this guidance in any way alter,
interpret, or effect the requirements of
the National Voter Registration Act of
1993?
No. Nothing in this guidance should
be construed to alter, interpret or effect,
in any way whatsoever, the
requirements of the National Voter
Registration Act of 1993, including
requirements and timeframes with
respect to the administration of voter
registration and/or the process States
must follow in removing names of
registrants from the voting rolls.
5. Who is a local election official?
A local election official is the person
or persons who have primary legal
responsibility for determining the
eligibility of an individual to vote and
maintaining and updating the voter
registration information of eligible
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20115
voters in his/her voter registration
jurisdiction.
6. Who is responsible for implementing
the provisions of Section 303(a) of
HAVA?
The State through the State’s Chief
Election Official is responsible for
ensuring that the State has a single,
uniform, official, centralized, interactive
computerized statewide voter
registration list. However, local election
officials also have certain
responsibilities outlined in Section
303(a) of HAVA, particularly with
regard to entering voter registration
information into the statewide voter
registration list on an expedited basis.
7. What is the official list of voters
pursuant to Section 303(a) of HAVA?
The official list is the list defined,
maintained and administered by the
State through the State’s Chief Election
Official.
III. Guidance on Statewide Voter
Registration Lists
8. What types of databases meet the
requirements of HAVA to generate a
single, uniform voter registration list?
HAVA requires State and local
election officials to use and access the
same statewide voter registration list for
purposes of conducting voter
registration and voting in an election for
Federal office. While databases hosted
on a single, central platform (e.g.,
mainframe and/or client servers) are
most closely akin to the requirements of
HAVE, a database which gathers its
information from local voter registration
databases or servers may also meet the
single, uniform list requirement as long
as the statewide voter registration list is
defined, maintained and administered
by the State (e.g., the State establishes
uniform software for use by all local
databases) and the statewide voter
registration list contains the name and
registration information of every legally
registered voter in the State with a
unique identifier (i.e., the last four digits
of a Social Security Number, driver’s
license number, or a unique number
assigned by the election official).
9. How frequently must the statewide
voter registration list be synchronized
with any local databases to assure that
the statewide voter registration list is
the single source for the names and
registration information of all legally
registered voters in the State?
At a minimum, the statewide voter
registration list should be synchronized
with local voter registration databases at
least once every 24 hours to assure that
the statewide voter registration list
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
20116
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 73 / Monday, April 18, 2005 / Notices
contains the names and registration
information for all legally registered
voters in the State and that local
election officials throughout the State
have immediate electronic access to
such information, as appropriate.
10. How should the statewide voter
registration list be coordinated with
other agency databases?
[Docket No. EA–302]
11. Who should have immediate
electronic access to the statewide voter
registration list?
At a minimum, local election officials
must have immediate electronic access
to the statewide voter registration list.
This means that the local official must
have access through some electronic
connection to the official statewide
voter registration list when needed to
process voter registrations, assist voters,
input or change data, or determine
eligibility of an individual to vote. The
level of access given to each user should
be appropriate to the function of the
user and should be established
collaboratively by the State and local
election officials. However, all voter
registration information obtained by any
local election official must be
electronically entered into the statewide
voter registration list on an expedited
basis at the time the information is
provided to the local official.
16:08 Apr 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
BILLING CODE 6820–YN–M
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
HAVA makes accurate voter
registration lists a priority. States should
coordinate the statewide voter
registration list with other state agency
databases (e.g., voter registration
agencies as defined by NVRA) that may
contain information relevant to the
statewide voter registration list.
Additionally, coordination between
the statewide voter registration list and
other government sources of
information (e.g., death and felony
records) is equally critical. States should
take steps to provide for regular
coordination of their statewide voter
registration lists with death and felony
records so as to assure that the statewide
voter registration list is current.
Moreover, section 303(a) of HAVA
requires States to match information
received on voter registration forms
against drivers license and social
security databases for the purpose of
verifying the accuracy of the
information received from all new voter
registrants. Under Section 303(b), such
validation provides an exemption to the
voter identification requirements for
first-time registrants by mail if the
information matches.
VerDate jul<14>2003
Dated: April 12, 2005.
Gracia Hillman,
Chair, Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–7713 Filed 4–15–05; 8:45 am]
Application To Export Electric Energy;
Duke Energy Marketing America, L.L.C.
Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.
Notice of application.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Duke Energy Marketing
America, L.L.C. (DEMA) has applied for
authority to transmit electric energy
from the United States to Canada
pursuant to section 202(e) of the Federal
Power Act.
DATES: Comments, protests or requests
to intervene must be submitted on or
before May 18, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments, protests or
requests to intervene should be
addressed as follows: Office of Coal &
Power Systems (FE–27), Office of Fossil
Energy, U.S. Department of Energy,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0350 (FAX 202–
287–5736).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Xavier Puslowski (Program Office) 202–
586–4708 or Michael Skinker (Program
Attorney) 202–586–2793.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Exports of
electricity from the United States to a
foreign country are regulated and
require authorization under section
202(e) of the Federal Power Act (FPA)
(16 U.S.C. 824a(e)).
On March 23, 2005, the Office of
Fossil Energy (FE) of the Department of
Energy (DOE) received an application
from DEMA to transmit electric energy
from the United States to Canada.
DEMA is wholly owned by Duke Energy
North America, LLC (a subsidiary of
Duke Energy Corporation). DEMA does
not own, operate or control any electric
power generation, transmission or
distribution facilities. DEMA has
requested an electricity export
authorization with a 5-year term. The
electric energy which DEMA proposes
to export to Canada would be purchased
from electric utilities and Federal power
marketing agencies within the U.S.
DEMA proposes to arrange for the
delivery of electric energy to Canada
over the existing international
transmission facilities owned by Basin
Electric Power Cooperative, Bonneville
Power Administration, Eastern Maine
Electric Cooperative, International
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Transmission Company, Joint Owners of
the Highgate Project, Long Sault, Inc.,
Maine Electric Power Company, Maine
Public Service Company, Minnesota
Power Inc., Minnkota Power
Cooperative, New York Power
Authority, Niagara Mohawk Power
Corporation, Northern States Power/
Excel, Vermont Electric Power Company
and Vermont Electric Transmission
Company.
The construction, operation,
maintenance, and connection of each of
the international transmission facilities
to be utilized by DEMA, as more fully
described in the application, has
previously been authorized by a
Presidential permit issued pursuant to
Executive Order 10485, as amended.
Procedural Matters: Any person
desiring to become a party to this
proceeding or to be heard by filing
comments or protests to this application
should file a petition to intervene,
comment or protest at the address
provided above in accordance with
§§ 385.211 or 385.214 of the FERC’s
Rules of Practice and Procedures (18
CFR 385.211, 385.214). Fifteen copies of
each petition and protest should be filed
with DOE on or before the date listed
above.
Comments on the DEMA application
to export electric energy to Canada
should be clearly marked with Docket
EA–302. Additional copies are to be
filed directly with Gordon J. Smith, John
& Hengerer, 1200 17th Street, NW.,
Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036–3013
and David W. Wright, Duke Energy
Marketing America, L.L.C., 5400
Westheimer Ct., Houston, Texas 77056.
A final decision will be made on this
application after the environmental
impacts have been evaluated pursuant
to the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, and a determination is
made by the DOE that the proposed
action will not adversely impact on the
reliability of the U.S. electric power
supply system.
Copies of this application will be
made available, upon request, for public
inspection and copying at the address
provided above or by accessing the
Fossil Energy Home page at https://
www.fe.de.gov. Upon reaching the Fossil
Energy home page, select ‘‘Electricity
Regulation,’’ and then ‘‘Pending
Procedures’’ from the options menus.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 12,
2005.
Anthony J. Como,
Deputy Director, Electric Power Regulation,
Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 05–7693 Filed 4–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 73 (Monday, April 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20114-20116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7713]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Proposed Voluntary Guidance on Implementation of Statewide Voter
Registration Lists
AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC).
ACTION: Notice; proposed guidance and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EAC is proposing voluntary policy guidance on the
interpretation of section 303(a) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002
(HAVA). HAVA was enacted to set standards for the administration of
Federal elections. Included in the new standards is a requirement that
each State develop and maintain a single, statewide list of registered
voters. The voluntary guidance proposed by EAC will assist the States
in understanding and interpreting HAVA's standards regarding statewide
voter registration lists.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on this draft guidance on
or before 5 p.m. e.d.t. on May 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Juliet Thompson, General Counsel, via mail
to U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Avenue, Suite
1100, Washington, DC 20005; via fax to 202-566-1392; or via e-mail to
guidance@eac.gov. An electronic copy of the proposed guidance may be
found on the EAC's Web site: https://www.eac.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juliet Thompson, General Counsel,
Washington, DC, (202) 566-3100, Fax: (202) 566-1392.
Proposed Voluntary Guidance on Implementation of Statewide Voter
Registration Lists
I. Introduction
The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) requires the Chief
Election Official in each State to implement a ``single, uniform,
official, centralized, interactive computerized statewide voter
registration list.'' That list is to be ``defined, maintained, and
administered at the State level'' and must contain the ``name and
registration information of every legally registered voter in the
State.''
The details of implementing these statewide voter registration
lists were left to the States. However, Congress authorized the United
States Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to issue voluntary guidance
to assist the States with interpreting and implementing the provisions
of HAVA as they relate to the requirement for a statewide voter
[[Page 20115]]
registration list. It is important to note, however, that the EAC does
not have legal authority to interpret HAVA beyond providing voluntary
guidance in assisting States and local governments to meet the
requirements of HAVA. The civil enforcement of Title III of HAVA is
expressly assigned to the United States Department of Justice (DOJ).
Although it is clear that a single, uniform, official, centralized,
interactive computerized voter registration list is one that is
technically and functionally able to perform tasks described in
sections 303(a)(1)(A)(i) through 303(a)(1)(A)(vii) of HAVA,
clarification is needed as to how and to what extent each of these
functions must be accomplished by the statewide voter registration
list. The following is interpretative guidance that clarifies the
meaning of certain portions of section 303(a) of HAVA (42 U.S.C.
15483(a)).
The guidance also serves to encourage state and local election
officials to work together to define and assume their appropriate
responsibilities for meeting this HAVA requirement, as well as to
engage other relevant stakeholders in this process.
The guidance set forth below as developed by the EAC through a
process which involved holding a public meeting regarding the statewide
voter registration lists as well as convening a working group of state
and local election officials to assist with identifying the issues and
solutions involved with implementing a statewide voter registration
list. EAC held a public meeting wherein it received testimony from four
state election officials whose states have implemented statewide voter
registration lists, either prior to or since the passage of HAVA.
Subsequently, EAC, assisted by the National Academies, convened a two-
day working group meeting wherein state and local election officials
discussed issues that persist in the implementation of this HAVA
requirement. The working group received technical assistance from
technology experts invited by the Academies and representatives of the
country's motor vehicle administrators. EAC used these discussions as a
basis for developing the guidance that is presented below.
The following guidance on statewide voter registration lists is
restricted to issues of policy related to the development and
implementation of a single, uniform, official, centralized interactive
computerized statewide voter registration list. EAC and the working
group of state and local election officials will continue to explore
technical issues related to the maintenance and upgrade of these
database systems, with assistance from the National Academies.
Additional guidance and/or best practices related to these technology
issues will be developed, presented for comment, and adopted in the
coming months.
II. Scope and Definitions
1. Is guidance regarding statewide voter registration lists or Section
303(a) of HAVA mandatory?
No. The guidance issued here by EAC is voluntary. States can choose
to adopt this guidance as interpretative of HAVA's requirement for a
statewide voter registration list.
2. Who would benefit from this guidance?
This guidance is targeted to assist the States and local
governments in fulfilling their requirements under Section 303(a) of
HAVA. This guidance may help election officials understand HAVA's
intent to comprise a single, uniform statewide voter registration list
and the responsibilities that HAVA places on all election officials to
assure that the names and information contained in the statewide voter
registration list are accurate.
3. To whom is Section 303(a) of HAVA applicable?
The provisions of Section 303(a) apply to all States, the District
of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, and
the United States Virgin Islands except those that on or after the date
of enactment of HAVA had no requirement for registration of voters with
respect to elections for Federal office. Currently, only North Dakota
has no voter registration requirement.
4. Does this guidance in any way alter, interpret, or effect the
requirements of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993?
No. Nothing in this guidance should be construed to alter,
interpret or effect, in any way whatsoever, the requirements of the
National Voter Registration Act of 1993, including requirements and
timeframes with respect to the administration of voter registration
and/or the process States must follow in removing names of registrants
from the voting rolls.
5. Who is a local election official?
A local election official is the person or persons who have primary
legal responsibility for determining the eligibility of an individual
to vote and maintaining and updating the voter registration information
of eligible voters in his/her voter registration jurisdiction.
6. Who is responsible for implementing the provisions of Section 303(a)
of HAVA?
The State through the State's Chief Election Official is
responsible for ensuring that the State has a single, uniform,
official, centralized, interactive computerized statewide voter
registration list. However, local election officials also have certain
responsibilities outlined in Section 303(a) of HAVA, particularly with
regard to entering voter registration information into the statewide
voter registration list on an expedited basis.
7. What is the official list of voters pursuant to Section 303(a) of
HAVA?
The official list is the list defined, maintained and administered
by the State through the State's Chief Election Official.
III. Guidance on Statewide Voter Registration Lists
8. What types of databases meet the requirements of HAVA to generate a
single, uniform voter registration list?
HAVA requires State and local election officials to use and access
the same statewide voter registration list for purposes of conducting
voter registration and voting in an election for Federal office. While
databases hosted on a single, central platform (e.g., mainframe and/or
client servers) are most closely akin to the requirements of HAVE, a
database which gathers its information from local voter registration
databases or servers may also meet the single, uniform list requirement
as long as the statewide voter registration list is defined, maintained
and administered by the State (e.g., the State establishes uniform
software for use by all local databases) and the statewide voter
registration list contains the name and registration information of
every legally registered voter in the State with a unique identifier
(i.e., the last four digits of a Social Security Number, driver's
license number, or a unique number assigned by the election official).
9. How frequently must the statewide voter registration list be
synchronized with any local databases to assure that the statewide
voter registration list is the single source for the names and
registration information of all legally registered voters in the State?
At a minimum, the statewide voter registration list should be
synchronized with local voter registration databases at least once
every 24 hours to assure that the statewide voter registration list
[[Page 20116]]
contains the names and registration information for all legally
registered voters in the State and that local election officials
throughout the State have immediate electronic access to such
information, as appropriate.
10. How should the statewide voter registration list be coordinated
with other agency databases?
HAVA makes accurate voter registration lists a priority. States
should coordinate the statewide voter registration list with other
state agency databases (e.g., voter registration agencies as defined by
NVRA) that may contain information relevant to the statewide voter
registration list.
Additionally, coordination between the statewide voter registration
list and other government sources of information (e.g., death and
felony records) is equally critical. States should take steps to
provide for regular coordination of their statewide voter registration
lists with death and felony records so as to assure that the statewide
voter registration list is current.
Moreover, section 303(a) of HAVA requires States to match
information received on voter registration forms against drivers
license and social security databases for the purpose of verifying the
accuracy of the information received from all new voter registrants.
Under Section 303(b), such validation provides an exemption to the
voter identification requirements for first-time registrants by mail if
the information matches.
11. Who should have immediate electronic access to the statewide voter
registration list?
At a minimum, local election officials must have immediate
electronic access to the statewide voter registration list. This means
that the local official must have access through some electronic
connection to the official statewide voter registration list when
needed to process voter registrations, assist voters, input or change
data, or determine eligibility of an individual to vote. The level of
access given to each user should be appropriate to the function of the
user and should be established collaboratively by the State and local
election officials. However, all voter registration information
obtained by any local election official must be electronically entered
into the statewide voter registration list on an expedited basis at the
time the information is provided to the local official.
Dated: April 12, 2005.
Gracia Hillman,
Chair, Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-7713 Filed 4-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-YN-M