Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief From the Requirements of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 236, 20202-20203 [05-7643]
Download as PDF
20202
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 73 / Monday, April 18, 2005 / Notices
submitted by Greater Orlando Aviation
Authority was substantially complete
within the requirements of section
158.25 of part 158. The FAA will
approve or disapprove the application,
in whole or in part, no later than July
21, 2005.
The following is a brief overview of
the application.
Proposed charge effective date: May 1,
2016.
Proposed charge expiration date:
November 1, 2020.
Level of the proposed PFC: $3.00.
Total estimated PFC revenue:
$232,818,000.
and other documents germane to the
application in person at the Greater
Orlando Aviation Authority.
Brief description of proposed project(s):
Runway 18L/18R Runway Safety Area (RSA),
Improvements (MCO) (Design &
Construction); East Airfield Modifications
(MCO) (Design Only); West Airfield Taxiway
Improvements (MCO) (Design Only); Airfield
Pavement Rehabilitation (MCO) (Design &
Construction); Implement Sound Insulation &
Property Acquisition Program (MCO) (Design
& Construction); High Mast Lighting
Rehabilitation (MCO) (Design &
Construction); Taxiways E & F Rehabilitation
(MCO) (Design & Construction); Airsides 1
and 3 Rehabilitation (MCO) (Design &
Construction); Airside Terminal 2 Expansion
(MCO) (Design & Construction); Extension of
Taxiways G1 and H2 (MCO) (Design &
Construction); Airside 2 and 4 Ramp
Rehabilitation (MCO) (Design &
Construction); New Large Aircraft
Modifications at West Airfield (MCO) (Design
& Construction); Mitigation Management/
Environmental Costs (MCO) (Design &
Construction); Reimbursement of Mitigation
Management/Environmental Costs (MCO);
Airport Exit Road Improvements (MCO)
(Design & Construction); Roadway
Rehabilitation Project (MCO) (Design &
Construction); Cargo Road Extension (MCO);
Widening of South Access Road (MCO)
(Design & Construction); Enplane/Deplane
Drive Expansion Joints & Lighting
Rehabilitation (MCO) (Design &
Construction); Landside Terminal Emergency
Electrical System Improvements (MCO)
(Design & Construction); Security
Improvement Program (MCO) (Design &
Construction); Explosion Detection System
(EDS) Implementation (MCO) (Design &
Construction); Terminal Improvement
Program (MCO) (Design & Construction);
Reimbursement of Airfield Improvement
Projects (ORL); Airfield Lighting and
Drainage Improvements (ORL) (Design &
Construction); NAVAID Improvements (ORL)
(Design & Construction); East and West
Quadrant Ramp Improvements (ORL) (Design
& Construction)
Airborne Selective Calling Equipment
Class or classes of air carriers which
the public agency has requested not be
required to collect PFCs: Not applicable
Any person may inspect the
application in person at the FAA office
listed above under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
In addition, any person may, upon
request, inspect the application, notice
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:08 Apr 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
Dated: Issued in Orlando, Florida, on April
7, 2005.
W. Dean Stringer,
Manager, Orlando Airport District Office
Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 05–7632 Filed 4–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for public comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
availability of, and requests comment on
proposed Technical Standard Order
(TSO) C–59a, Airborne Selective Calling
(SELCAL) Equipment. This proposed
TSO tells persons seeking a TSO
authorization or letter of design
approval what minimum performance
standards (MPS) their SELCAL must
meet to be identified with the
appropriate TSO marking.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 18, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send all comments on this
proposed TSO to: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Aircraft
Certification Service, Aircraft
Engineering Division, Avionics Systems
Branch (AIR–130), 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591.
ATTN: Mr. David Robinson. Or, you
may deliver comments to: Federal
Aviation Administration, Room 815,
800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David Robinson, AIR–130, Room 815,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591. Telephone (202)
385–4650, FAX: (202) 385–4651.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
You are invited to comment on the
proposed TSO by submitting written
data, views, or arguments to the above
address. Comments received may be
examined, both before and after the
closing date, in room 815 at the above
address, weekdays except federal
holidays, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30
p.m. The Director, Aircraft Certification
Service, will consider all comments
received on or before the closing date
before issuing the final TSO.
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
This TSO prescribes the minimum
performance standard for airborne
selective calling (SELCAL) equipment
intended to permit selective calling of
individual aircraft over approved
communications channels linking the
ground station with the aircraft. The
system is designed to operate with
existing high frequency (HF) and very
high frequency (VHF) ground-to-air
transmitters and receivers.
How To Obtain Copies
You can view or download the
proposed TSO from its online location
at: https://www.airweb.faa.gov/rgl. At
this web page, select ‘‘Technical
Standard Orders.’’ At the TSO page,
select ‘‘Proposed Orders.’’ For a paper
copy, contact the person list in FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Dated: Issued in Washington, DC, on April
11, 2005.
Susan J. M. Cabler,
Acting Manager, Aircraft Engineering
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–7619 Filed 4–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Application for Approval of
Discontinuance or Modification of a
Railroad Signal System or Relief From
the Requirements of Title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 236
Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Part 235 and 49
U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroad
has petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) seeking approval
for the discontinuance or modification
of the signal system or relief from the
requirements of 49 CFR Part 236 as
detailed below.
Docket Number FRA–2005–20758
Applicants: Consolidated Rail
Corporation, Mr. R. E. Inman,
Assistant Chief Engineer—C& S/
Maintenance, 1000 Howard
Boulevard, Room 470, Mount Laurel,
New Jersey 08054–2355.
Canadian National Railroad, Mr. David
Ferryman, Chief Engineer-U.S.
Region, 17641 South Ashland
Avenue, Homewood, Illinois 60430–
1345.
The Consolidated Rail Corporation
(Conrail) and the Canadian National
Railroad (CN), jointly seeks approval of
the proposed modification of Schaefer
Interlocking, milepost 3.08, near
Dearborn, Michigan, where the single
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 73 / Monday, April 18, 2005 / Notices
Conrail Junction Yard Secondary track,
cross at grade, the two CN Schaefer Yard
Tracks. The proposed changes consist of
the conversion of Schaefer Interlocking
from manual to automatic operation.
The reason given for the proposed
change is that both Conrail and CN
tracks are operated at slow speed, and
the conversion of Schaefer Interlocking
to a full automatic interlocking, would
allow train crews to make moves
without contacting the Schaefer Tower
block operator, thus reducing radio
traffic.
Any interested party desiring to
protest the granting of an application
shall set forth specifically the grounds
upon which the protest is made, and
include a concise statement of the
interest of the party in the proceeding.
Additionally, one copy of the protest
shall be furnished to the applicant at the
address listed above.
All communications concerning this
proceeding should be identified by the
docket number and must be submitted
to the Docket Clerk, DOT Central Docket
Management Facility, Room PL–401
(Plaza Level), 400 7th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Communications received within 45
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by the FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after
that date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://dms.dot.gov.
FRA wishes to inform all potential
commenters that anyone is able to
search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–
78) or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
FRA expects to be able to determine
these matters without an oral hearing.
However, if a specific request for an oral
hearing is accompanied by a showing
that the party is unable to adequately
present his or her position by written
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:08 Apr 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
statements, an application may be set
for public hearing.
Issued in Washington, DC on April 12,
2005.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 05–7643 Filed 4–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) received
a request for a waiver of compliance
with certain requirements of its safety
standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party
seeking relief, the regulatory provisions
involved, the nature of the relief being
requested, and the petitioner’s
arguments in favour of relief.
Link Up International, Corporation
[Docket Number FRA–2005–20426]
The Link Up International
Corporation (LUIC) seeks a waiver of
compliance from the requirements of
Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) § 231 Safety Appliance Standards,
specifically § 231.1.(a) Handbrake (2)
Dimensions. 231.1(a)(2)(ii) The brake
wheel may be flat or dished, not less
than 15, preferably 16, inches in
diameter, of malleable iron, wrought
iron, or steel.
LUIC requests this requirement be
permanently waived to manufacture
handbrake wheels from a high density
polyethylene, and with an aluminum or
steel insert, over-molded in place.
LUIC contends a composite wheel
offers several cost and safety-related
advantages over a standard steel wheel.
LUIC contends the primary benefit of a
composite wheel is weight reduction
that will significantly reduce wear to
drive shaft bearings that will extend life
to the handbrake. LUIC believes there
are secondary benefits related to safety
by applying the composite wheel with
increased torque and reduce personal
injuries by having finger ridges and
cross-checked etched pattern into the
surface to enhance the grip, yet subtle
enough to prevent personal injury
compared to a steel wheel that can have
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20203
a rough finish with metal burs. LUIC
believes the rail industry will see a
significant savings with composite
handbrake wheels by purchase price
equal to or below standard steel wheels,
with longer handbrake life, and
elimination of handbrake injuries.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2005–
20426) and must be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Clerk, DOT
Central Docket Management Facility,
Room Pl–401, Washington, DC. 20590–
0001. Communications received within
45 days of the date of this notice will
be considered by FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after
that date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at DOT
Central Docket Management Facility,
Room Pl–401 (Plaza Level), 400 Seventh
Street SW., Washington. All documents
in the public docket are also available
for inspection and copying on the
Internet at the docket facility’s Web site
at https://dms.dot.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19377–78). The
statement may also be found at https://
dms.dot.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC. on April 12,
2005.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 05–7642 Filed 4–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 73 (Monday, April 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20202-20203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7643]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or
Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief From the
Requirements of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 236
Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 235 and
49 U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroad has petitioned the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) seeking approval for the discontinuance
or modification of the signal system or relief from the requirements of
49 CFR Part 236 as detailed below.
Docket Number FRA-2005-20758
Applicants: Consolidated Rail Corporation, Mr. R. E. Inman, Assistant
Chief Engineer--C& S/Maintenance, 1000 Howard Boulevard, Room 470,
Mount Laurel, New Jersey 08054-2355.
Canadian National Railroad, Mr. David Ferryman, Chief Engineer-U.S.
Region, 17641 South Ashland Avenue, Homewood, Illinois 60430-1345.
The Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) and the Canadian
National Railroad (CN), jointly seeks approval of the proposed
modification of Schaefer Interlocking, milepost 3.08, near Dearborn,
Michigan, where the single
[[Page 20203]]
Conrail Junction Yard Secondary track, cross at grade, the two CN
Schaefer Yard Tracks. The proposed changes consist of the conversion of
Schaefer Interlocking from manual to automatic operation.
The reason given for the proposed change is that both Conrail and
CN tracks are operated at slow speed, and the conversion of Schaefer
Interlocking to a full automatic interlocking, would allow train crews
to make moves without contacting the Schaefer Tower block operator,
thus reducing radio traffic.
Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of an
application shall set forth specifically the grounds upon which the
protest is made, and include a concise statement of the interest of the
party in the proceeding. Additionally, one copy of the protest shall be
furnished to the applicant at the address listed above.
All communications concerning this proceeding should be identified
by the docket number and must be submitted to the Docket Clerk, DOT
Central Docket Management Facility, Room PL-401 (Plaza Level), 400 7th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Communications received within 45 days of the date of this notice
will be considered by the FRA before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the above
facility. All documents in the public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the internet at the docket facility's Web
site at https://dms.dot.gov.
FRA wishes to inform all potential commenters that anyone is able
to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
FRA expects to be able to determine these matters without an oral
hearing. However, if a specific request for an oral hearing is
accompanied by a showing that the party is unable to adequately present
his or her position by written statements, an application may be set
for public hearing.
Issued in Washington, DC on April 12, 2005.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. 05-7643 Filed 4-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P