Pipeline Safety: Controller Certification Pilot Program (CCERT), 19984-19987 [05-7638]
Download as PDF
19984
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 72 / Friday, April 15, 2005 / Notices
15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby
determine that the objects to be
included in the exhibition
‘‘Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of
the Pharaohs,’’ imported from abroad for
temporary exhibition within the United
States, are of cultural significance. The
objects are imported pursuant to a loan
agreement with the foreign owner. I also
determine that the exhibition or display
of the exhibit objects at the Los Angeles
County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, CA
from on or about June 15, 2005 to on or
about November 15, 2005, Museum of
Art, Fort Lauderdale, FL from on or
about December 15, 2005 to on or about
April 23, 2006, Field Museum, Chicago,
IL from on or about May 26, 2006 to on
or about January 1, 2007, Franklin
Institute, Philadelphia, PA from on or
about January 31, 2007 to on or about
September 30, 2007, and at possible
additional venues yet to be determined,
is in the national interest. Public Notice
of these determinations is ordered to be
published in the Federal Register.
For Further Information Contact: For
further information, including a list of
the exhibit objects, contact Carol B.
Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the
Legal Adviser, Department of State,
(telephone: 202/453–8048). The address
is Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC
20547–0001.
Dated: April 8, 2005.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. 05–7715 Filed 4–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. RSPA–04–18584; Notice 1]
Pipeline Safety: Controller Certification
Pilot Program (CCERT)
Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS),
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice; Controller Certification
Pilot Program.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice seeks participants
and provides information about the
certification study project affecting
individuals who operate computerbased systems for controlling the
operation of gas and hazardous liquid
pipelines (pipeline controllers) and the
associated pilot program required by
Section 13(b) of the Pipeline Safety
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:34 Apr 14, 2005
Jkt 205001
Improvement Act of 2002 (PSIA). This
notice describes the purpose and scope
of a project being undertaken by the
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration’s (PHMSA) (formerly
the Research and Special Programs
Administration) Office of Pipeline
Safety (OPS) to determine what actions
it should recommend for additional
assurance that individuals who operate
computer-based systems for controlling
the operation of gas and hazardous
liquid pipelines are adequately qualified
and, if deemed necessary, certified to
perform their job responsibilities. The
public is invited to inquire about this
project through the contact information
below, and is encouraged to provide
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Byron Coy, (telephone: 609–989–2180;
e-mail: byron.coy@dot.gov) regarding
the subject matter of this notice.
Additional information about this notice
can be accessed in the docket captioned
above on the DOT Docket Management
System Web site at: https://dms.dot.gov.
DATES: Persons interested in
participating in the pilot program or
submitting written comments on the
controller certification overall project or
the pilot operator program should do so
by May 16, 2005.
ADDRESSES: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://dms.dot.gov or to
Room PL–401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays. You may
submit written comments to the docket
by any of the following methods:
• Mail: Dockets Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Room
PL–401, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
20590–0001. Anyone wanting
confirmation of mailed comments must
include a self-addressed stamped
postcard.
• Hand delivery or courier: Room PL–
401, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC. The Dockets Facility is
open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov,
click on ‘‘Comments/Submissions’’ and
follow instructions at the site.
All written comments should identify
the docket number and notice number
stated in the heading of this notice.
Background
Over the past eight years, 10 of the 18
pipeline incident/accident
investigations conducted by the
National Transportation Safety Board
(NTSB) have identified controller’s
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
actions or reactions, or the computer
systems they use, as significant factors
in detecting or contributing to the initial
event, influencing reaction time or
affecting the magnitude of an event.
Controllers are individuals that use
computers to control pipelines. Section
13(b)(1)(A) requires PHMSA to ‘‘develop
tests and other requirements for
certifying the qualifications of
individuals who operate computerbased systems for controlling the
operations of pipelines.’’
For the purposes of this overall
project, tests refers to the examination
and evaluation of: (a) Current operator
training and qualification processes and
practices (through the pilot operator
program), (b) current regulations, (c)
industry standards, including ASME
B31Q, and (d) program development,
practices, and requirements for control
room operating personnel that are
applied in other industries.
Section 13(b)(1)(B) requires PHMSA
to ‘‘establish and carry out a pilot
program for 3 pipeline facilities under
which the individuals operating
computer-based systems for controlling
the operations of pipelines at such
facilities are required to be certified
under the process established under
subparagraph (A).’’ Further, Section
13(b)(2) requires PHMSA to develop a
report to Congress on the results of the
pilot program that includes
recommendations on the certification of
pipeline controllers.
Overall Project Objectives
This overall project will explore
whether current regulations are
sufficient to address the findings
resulting from these accidents and other
project development activities or
whether regulations need to be
enhanced to provide additional
controller qualification requirements.
The overall project will also determine
whether a certification process for
controllers is warranted.
The objectives of the overall project
are to:
• Define and document current
practices and processes that pipeline
operators use to determine that
controllers have adequate knowledge,
skills and abilities to perform their
assigned tasks.
• Evaluate and determine what
practices and processes best serve to
substantiate that individual pipeline
controllers have adequate knowledge,
skills and abilities to perform their
assigned tasks.
• Determine what evaluation
techniques, criteria, and validation
frequency can most effectively
demonstrate proficiency.
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 72 / Friday, April 15, 2005 / Notices
• Define what administrative
procedures, records, and certification
criteria can best serve to demonstrate
the aforementioned objectives.
• Determine how specific or uniform
such practices, process content,
evaluation parameters, and
administrative procedures are across the
various types of pipeline operators.
• Determine the adequacy of the
existing operator personnel qualification
requirements for controllers, in light of
the significant impact they can have on
pipeline safety and integrity.
• Develop conclusions and establish
recommendations to be reported to
Congress at the end of the project.
Overall Project Strategy
OPS experience, supplemented by
consultation with a specifically
assembled focus group, and a variety of
operator interviews conducted at the
beginning of this project have all
validated that qualification practices for
controllers among pipeline operators
vary greatly. These differences are based
on pipeline characteristics and varying
operational needs. Even within each
operator type [gas transmission, local
distribution companies (LDC),
hazardous liquids, liquefied natural gas
(LNG)], there are varied and sometimes
unique safety-sensitive job tasks that
controllers are expected to perform.
These differences would make it
difficult to develop a substantive
universal test to qualify controllers.
Thus, a uniform controller evaluation/
certification test for the entire industry
would likely not address many operatorspecific and sometimes unique tasks
critical to pipeline integrity and safety.
To provide a higher assurance that
controllers possess adequate knowledge,
skills and abilities, the project team will
be focusing on the content of the
pipeline operators’ administrative,
training and evaluation techniques that
make up the controller qualification
process. Each operator should have a
controller qualification program that is
specifically designed to address the
particular attributes and needs of its
pipeline. The project team will
recommend a specific set of topic areas
and content with a level of adequacy
and thoroughness expected of an
operator’s qualification program and
associated administrative processes.
Project recommendations will address
criteria to determine adequate material
content, a structured and encompassing
qualification process, and thoroughness
and adequacy in an operator’s training,
performance monitoring and periodic
evaluation activities. Each of these
elements is discussed below.
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:34 Apr 14, 2005
Jkt 205001
Description of the Project Scope
PSIA–2002, Section 13(b) specifically
uses the phrase ‘‘persons who use
computers to control pipelines.’’ Section
13(b) implies that an elevated risk to the
public would result from ineffective
qualification of persons who use
computers to control pipelines. The Act
does not specifically identify or exclude
any type of pipeline based on its
operating pressure, degree of
sophistication, pipe mileage, or how
computers are used to control the
pipeline system. Since the application
of computer technology is prolific,
sophisticated computer control systems
(SCADA) have now been deployed in a
wide variety of applications, including
individual remote stations, thereby
defining the range of the project beyond
the traditional Supervisory Control and
Data Acquisition systems (SCADA)
control room.
SCADA systems are used extensively
in the pipeline industry. These systems
provide a means for controllers (an
individual or team) to monitor and
control pipeline stations and other
facilities. These systems can provide
remote control over great distances.
Application of SCADA systems has
resulted in a reduction of pipeline field
staffs, making the role of the controller
critical to safety and integrity in
pipeline operations. In cross-country
hazardous liquid and gas transmission
pipelines, controllers routinely monitor
and send commands to change flow
rates and pressures. Prompted by an
assortment of factors, hazardous liquid
and gas transmission pipeline
controllers are re-directing flow, starting
and stopping pipeline segments or
adjusting flow rates to accommodate
market conditions, maintenance activity
and weather on a regional or sometimes
national basis. For these types of
pipelines, dynamic operating conditions
require controllers to have a high level
of knowledge, skills and abilities to
safely maintain systems and promptly
recognize operating anomalies and
abnormal conditions as they develop.
Although the formal pilot program
will place an emphasis on gas
transmission and hazardous liquid
pipelines, OPS will be able to address
all of the following groups in the
context of the project report and
recommendations:
• Gas transmission pipeline
controllers.
• Hazardous liquid pipeline
controllers.
• Pipeline controllers who reside in
gas compressor and hazardous liquid
pump stations.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19985
• Pipeline controllers who reside in
LNG facilities, to the extent they control
pipelines.
• LDC pipeline controllers.
The work of this project will then
include consideration for the
qualification and potential need for
certification processes related to this
broader set of pipeline controller
personnel. OPS acknowledges the
differences in operating hydraulics and
the role of controllers between
hazardous liquid and natural gas
pipelines, and will take these
differences into consideration during
the development of the project and the
eventual recommendations.
Identification of the Focus Group
A Focus Group of stakeholders was
established early in the project,
including representatives of the public,
industry trade associations, pipeline
operators, state pipeline safety agencies,
academia and OPS. Discussions with
the Focus Group provided insight
regarding key operational and logistic
considerations for the project.
Information came directly from the
Focus Group participants and
subsequently from members of their
respective constituencies. In addition,
project updates have been presented at
several trade association meetings,
where additional feedback was attained.
OPS will continue to use the Focus
Group throughout the term of the
project.
Accident and Incident Review
Preliminary review of the NTSB
incident/accident data indicates that
more detailed information regarding a
controller’s functions could be collected
as a part of accident and incident
reporting, to permit a more definitive
analysis of controller involvement. Such
additional information would support a
more thorough review in future
analysis. There are many other events
for which reporting is not mandated by
current regulations, such as upset
conditions, near-miss events, situations
that were averted by the operation of
safety systems and other operating
anomalies that did not reach current
reportable thresholds. The tabulation
and analysis of such events could
provide additional information to
support a more thorough controller
performance review, metrics analysis,
targeted or enhanced training and
general pipeline safety and integrity
improvements. This additional
information could also be used to
determine and/or substantiate the
adequacy of current controller
qualification programs.
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
19986
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 72 / Friday, April 15, 2005 / Notices
Survey of Industry Practices
OPS met with a broad cross-section of
pipeline operators in the fourth quarter
of 2003 to learn what pipeline operators
are currently doing to meet existing
operator qualification requirements for
controllers. OPS will be meeting with
representatives of other industries,
additional pipeline operators and
research organizations during the course
of the project to gather an expanded set
of information that will help develop
and substantiate the recommendations
and conclusions of our report. The
industry visits conducted to date are
tabulated in the docket.
As a result of these visits, pipeline
control functions have been categorized.
Currently, principal control function
categories are defined as: full remote
control, detect/monitor/direct field
operations, and detect/monitor/defer to
field operations. In each case,
controllers were using computers to
detect and monitor operations and then
either perform control functions
themselves or direct or advise field
operations of needed attention based on
the controller’s responsibility, authority
and assessment of the situation. These
control function categories were
developed to more clearly separate
operators into controller function
groups.
Participation in B31Q (National
Consensus Standard on Pipeline
Personnel Qualification)
OPS recognizes the ongoing effort to
develop a more thorough, consensusbased standard for gas and hazardous
liquid pipeline personnel qualification
programs. The American Society of
Mechanical Engineers (ASME) is now
engaged in the development of a
national consensus standard entitled
ASME B31Q, ‘‘Pipeline Personnel
Qualification Standard.’’ It is
anticipated that this standard will
include qualification requirements for
pipeline controllers who are performing
tasks influencing pipeline safety or
integrity. It will also incorporate a set of
management practices intended to
ensure that personnel qualifications will
be maintained so that they remain
current, and consistent with tasks
performed. The completion of ASME
B31Q is imminent. Should ASME B31Q
be completed within the time frame of
the Controller Certification project,
there may be an opportunity to select
one or more operators to demonstrate
and test applicable elements of the
B31Q’s controller-related qualification
requirements during the pilot program.
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:34 Apr 14, 2005
Jkt 205001
Investigation of Controllers’ Interaction
with Computers
This project will also examine the
interface and data presentation
characteristics of the computer systems
that controllers use to operate pipelines.
This work will be supplemented by
reviews of other industrial control room
settings. PHMSA/OPS acknowledges
that this area is beyond traditional
personnel qualifications, but has
identified that this areas should be
addressed as an aspect of the
Congressional recommendations and
report due at the conclusion of this
project. A review of the adequacy and
presentation of data through the
computer system will be limited to
those areas that may affect the
controller’s ability to accurately
recognize and promptly react to
abnormal operating conditions, or those
other conditions that may lead to
abnormal operating conditions. Specific
areas of interest are not necessarily
limited to:
1. Access to sufficient pipeline system
information.
2. Accuracy of the information
provided.
3. Color pallet and number of colors
used to convey information.
4. Interaction and navigation within
the control system displays.
5. Initiation of controller commands.
6. Security from unauthorized
commands and control.
7. Alarm and event configuration and
management.
8. Recognition of control system
degradation.
9. Alternative means of system
monitoring and control in times of
system failures.
10. The conditions surrounding the
testing of alternative means of system
monitoring and control.
Pilot Program
The PSIA directs that three operators
be selected to formally participate in the
pilot program. The pilot program will be
conducted from the 2nd quarter of 2005
through the 1st quarter of 2006.
Information gathered during the
industry survey indicated that many
local distribution company controllers
advise and defer action to district field
operations personnel for needed control
adjustments. Therefore, the pilot
program will focus on hazardous liquid
and gas transmission pipelines, and will
not include an operator who is solely a
local distribution company. In addition
to the three formal pilot participants,
additional operators of all types will be
contacted informally to provide
supplemental information on practices,
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
processes, procedures and standards
that are used, or could be used to
demonstrate controller qualification
thoroughness and effectiveness. The
similarity of some controller function
across all operator types will allow
certain portions of the report and
recommendations to address all
pipeline operators.
The purpose of the Pilot Program is
to: (1) Evaluate the effectiveness of the
practices and administrative processes
currently used by operators in the
qualification of controllers; (2) review
training programs, qualification
requirements, evaluation methods,
evaluation criteria, success thresholds,
and re-evaluation intervals to determine
their adequacy and thoroughness in the
controller qualification process; and (3)
explore how these processes and
evaluation criteria could be used to
develop uniform protocols and
acceptance criteria for the certification
of pipeline operators’ controller
qualification processes. The pilot
program will be used to examine and
evaluate:
1. Operators’ procedures and practices
for Operator Qualification (OQ)
regulations for pipeline controllers,
including evaluation practices and
frequency, and other regulatory
requirements.
2. Methods and metrics employed to
measure and document ongoing
individual controller performance.
3. Operator studies or research (past
or present) related to controller
qualifications, performance metrics or
other related topics.
4. Measures in place to monitor
individual controller performance
between formal periodic evaluations.
5. Benefits anticipated from voluntary
candidate changes or enhancements to
controller qualifications requirements.
6. Administrative processes used to
pre-screen potential controllers,
processes to suspend, revoke and restore
a controller’s job assignment, and
documentation to substantiate ongoing
qualification adequacy.
OPS invites pipeline operators to
volunteer to participate in the pilot
program. Participation of pilot program
operators will include on-site
observation by OPS representatives as
further described in this notice, and will
also include discussions regarding the
development of project
recommendations. Operators wishing to
participate in the pilot must submit
descriptions of the controller
qualification processes and systems they
are using to validate the training and
proficiency of their controllers.
Operators may also include a brief
description of any new techniques that
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 72 / Friday, April 15, 2005 / Notices
they may wish to initiate and evaluate
during the course of the pilots. OPS will
review candidate submissions to
determine which three best serve the
objectives of the project. Operators
wishing to participate in the pilot
program must submit information
outlining the systems and processes
used in their controller qualification
program by May 16, 2005. Details
outlining the submittal process are
further explained in this document and
in the docket.
During the pilot program period, OPS
will monitor and evaluate programs of
the selected pilot operators to determine
the value that specific practices would
add to an adequate qualification
program, and possibly a certification
process. The pilot program will not
include operator qualification
inspections of the pilot operators. OPS
will have an active dialog with the pilot
operators on an ongoing basis, review
preliminary pilot findings with each
pilot operator, and seek their additional
input before developing conclusions
and recommendations for the final
report to Congress. Estimates of
maximum operator man-hour
requirements for the pilots are included
in the docket.
OPS will also be studying research
findings and will review existing
qualification and certification processes
that are employed or have been
considered for aircraft pilots, aviation
flight controllers railroad engineers and
train dispatchers. Other industries
where requirements and operating
practices have similarities to pipeline
controllers may also be identified and
reviewed.
In conjunction with the pilot program,
the overall project team will review
recent incident and accident data to
assure that the activities of the pilot
program and subsequent
recommendations include recognition of
lessons learned from those events that
may have been attributed to, or
aggravated by, controller involvement or
lack of action. This review will
encompass a review of OPS records and
NTSB reports and recommendations.
Control room personnel evaluation,
administration, certification and
performance monitoring practices
employed for Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) Air Traffic
Controllers and Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) Rail System
operations will also be studied.
As required by PSIA, the resulting
recommendations and other criteria will
be prepared as a final report and
submitted to Congress in December
2006. The report will focus on pipeline
operators’ administrative and
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:34 Apr 14, 2005
Jkt 205001
procedural processes that are, or could
be, employed to provide an elevated
assurance that controllers possess
adequate knowledge, skills and abilities.
The report may conclude that existing
or pending regulations and/or industry
standards are adequate to ensure
qualified controllers, or that current
regulations and/or industry standards
are not sufficient and additional
measures are needed. The report may
also conclude that further study should
be applied in certain topical areas.
OPS will summarize the pilot results,
merge other project findings into the
project report, and submit the report to
Congress by December 17, 2006, as
required by the PSIA.
The docket provides additional
information regarding the pilot program.
Candidate pilot operators must be
regulated under 49 CFR parts 192 and/
or 195. A data form has been developed
to assist candidate operators in
providing sufficient information to OPS
regarding pilot operator volunteers; this
form is available in the docket.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60102, 60109, 60117.
Issued in Washington, DC on April 11,
2005.
Theodore L. Willke,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline
Safety.
[FR Doc. 05–7638 Filed 4–12–05; 4:27 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Docket No. AB–295 (Sub–No. 6X)]
The Indiana Rail Road Company—
Abandonment Exemption—in Monroe
County, IN
The Indiana Rail Road Company
(INRD) has filed a notice of exemption
under 49 CFR 1152 Subpart F—Exempt
Abandonments to abandon a 2.44-mile
portion of its Ellettsville Branch from
milepost Q216.13 near Loesch Road to
the end of the line at Ellettsville,
milepost Q213.69, in Monroe County,
IN. The line traverses United States
Postal Service ZIP Codes 47404 and
47429.
INRD has certified that: (1) No local
traffic has moved over the line for at
least 2 years; (2) any overhead traffic
can be rerouted over other lines; (3) no
formal complaint filed by a user of rail
service on the line (or by a state or local
government entity acting on behalf of
such user) regarding cessation of service
over the line either is pending with the
Board or with any U.S. District Court or
has been decided in favor of
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19987
complainant within the 2-year period;
and (4) the requirements at 49 CFR
1105.7 (environmental reports), 49 CFR
1105.8 (historic reports), 49 CFR
1105.11 (transmittal letter), 49 CFR
1105.12 (newspaper publication), and
49 CFR 1152.50(d)(1) (notice to
governmental agencies) have been met.
As a condition to this exemption, any
employee adversely affected by the
abandonment shall be protected under
Oregon Short Line R. Co.—
Abandonment—Goshen, 360 I.C.C. 91
(1979). To address whether this
condition adequately protects affected
employees, a petition for partial
revocation under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
must be filed.
Provided no formal expression of
intent to file an offer of financial
assistance (OFA) has been received, this
exemption will be effective on May 17,
2005, unless stayed pending
reconsideration. Petitions to stay that do
not involve environmental issues,1
formal expressions of intent to file an
OFA under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2),2 and
trail use/rail banking requests under 49
CFR 1152.29 must be filed by April 25,
2005. Petitions to reopen or requests for
public use conditions under 49 CFR
1152.28 must be filed by May 5, 2005,
with the Surface Transportation Board,
1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC
20423–0001.
A copy of any petition filed with the
Board should be sent to INRD’s
representative: John Broadley, John H.
Broadley & Associates, P.C., 1054 31st
Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC
20007.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio.
INRD has filed an environmental and
historic report which addresses the
effects, if any, of the abandonment on
the environment and historic resources.
SEA will issue an environmental
assessment (EA) by April 22, 2005.
Interested persons may obtain a copy of
the EA by writing to SEA (Room 500,
Surface Transportation Board,
Washington, DC 20423–0001) or by
calling SEA, at (202) 565–1539.
(Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
1 The Board will grant a stay if an informed
decision on environmental issues (whether raised
by a party or by the Board’s Section of
Environmental Analysis (SEA) in its independent
investigation) cannot be made before the
exemption’s effective date. See Exemption of Outof-Service Rail Lines, 5 I.C.C.2d 377 (1989). Any
request for a stay should be filed as soon as possible
so that the Board may take appropriate action before
the exemption’s effective date.
2 Each OFA must be accompanied by the filing
fee, which currently is set at $1,200. See 49 CFR
1002.2(f)(25).
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 72 (Friday, April 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19984-19987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7638]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
[Docket No. RSPA-04-18584; Notice 1]
Pipeline Safety: Controller Certification Pilot Program (CCERT)
AGENCY: Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice; Controller Certification Pilot Program.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice seeks participants and provides information about
the certification study project affecting individuals who operate
computer-based systems for controlling the operation of gas and
hazardous liquid pipelines (pipeline controllers) and the associated
pilot program required by Section 13(b) of the Pipeline Safety
Improvement Act of 2002 (PSIA). This notice describes the purpose and
scope of a project being undertaken by the Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration's (PHMSA) (formerly the Research and
Special Programs Administration) Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) to
determine what actions it should recommend for additional assurance
that individuals who operate computer-based systems for controlling the
operation of gas and hazardous liquid pipelines are adequately
qualified and, if deemed necessary, certified to perform their job
responsibilities. The public is invited to inquire about this project
through the contact information below, and is encouraged to provide
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Byron Coy, (telephone: 609-989-2180;
e-mail: byron.coy@dot.gov) regarding the subject matter of this notice.
Additional information about this notice can be accessed in the docket
captioned above on the DOT Docket Management System Web site at: http:/
/dms.dot.gov.
DATES: Persons interested in participating in the pilot program or
submitting written comments on the controller certification overall
project or the pilot operator program should do so by May 16, 2005.
ADDRESSES: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to https://dms.dot.gov or to Room PL-401 on the plaza level
of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
Holidays. You may submit written comments to the docket by any of the
following methods:
Mail: Dockets Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 20590-0001. Anyone wanting
confirmation of mailed comments must include a self-addressed stamped
postcard.
Hand delivery or courier: Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Washington, DC. The Dockets Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov, click on ``Comments/
Submissions'' and follow instructions at the site.
All written comments should identify the docket number and notice
number stated in the heading of this notice.
Background
Over the past eight years, 10 of the 18 pipeline incident/accident
investigations conducted by the National Transportation Safety Board
(NTSB) have identified controller's actions or reactions, or the
computer systems they use, as significant factors in detecting or
contributing to the initial event, influencing reaction time or
affecting the magnitude of an event. Controllers are individuals that
use computers to control pipelines. Section 13(b)(1)(A) requires PHMSA
to ``develop tests and other requirements for certifying the
qualifications of individuals who operate computer-based systems for
controlling the operations of pipelines.''
For the purposes of this overall project, tests refers to the
examination and evaluation of: (a) Current operator training and
qualification processes and practices (through the pilot operator
program), (b) current regulations, (c) industry standards, including
ASME B31Q, and (d) program development, practices, and requirements for
control room operating personnel that are applied in other industries.
Section 13(b)(1)(B) requires PHMSA to ``establish and carry out a
pilot program for 3 pipeline facilities under which the individuals
operating computer-based systems for controlling the operations of
pipelines at such facilities are required to be certified under the
process established under subparagraph (A).'' Further, Section 13(b)(2)
requires PHMSA to develop a report to Congress on the results of the
pilot program that includes recommendations on the certification of
pipeline controllers.
Overall Project Objectives
This overall project will explore whether current regulations are
sufficient to address the findings resulting from these accidents and
other project development activities or whether regulations need to be
enhanced to provide additional controller qualification requirements.
The overall project will also determine whether a certification process
for controllers is warranted.
The objectives of the overall project are to:
Define and document current practices and processes that
pipeline operators use to determine that controllers have adequate
knowledge, skills and abilities to perform their assigned tasks.
Evaluate and determine what practices and processes best
serve to substantiate that individual pipeline controllers have
adequate knowledge, skills and abilities to perform their assigned
tasks.
Determine what evaluation techniques, criteria, and
validation frequency can most effectively demonstrate proficiency.
[[Page 19985]]
Define what administrative procedures, records, and
certification criteria can best serve to demonstrate the aforementioned
objectives.
Determine how specific or uniform such practices, process
content, evaluation parameters, and administrative procedures are
across the various types of pipeline operators.
Determine the adequacy of the existing operator personnel
qualification requirements for controllers, in light of the significant
impact they can have on pipeline safety and integrity.
Develop conclusions and establish recommendations to be
reported to Congress at the end of the project.
Overall Project Strategy
OPS experience, supplemented by consultation with a specifically
assembled focus group, and a variety of operator interviews conducted
at the beginning of this project have all validated that qualification
practices for controllers among pipeline operators vary greatly. These
differences are based on pipeline characteristics and varying
operational needs. Even within each operator type [gas transmission,
local distribution companies (LDC), hazardous liquids, liquefied
natural gas (LNG)], there are varied and sometimes unique safety-
sensitive job tasks that controllers are expected to perform. These
differences would make it difficult to develop a substantive universal
test to qualify controllers. Thus, a uniform controller evaluation/
certification test for the entire industry would likely not address
many operator-specific and sometimes unique tasks critical to pipeline
integrity and safety.
To provide a higher assurance that controllers possess adequate
knowledge, skills and abilities, the project team will be focusing on
the content of the pipeline operators' administrative, training and
evaluation techniques that make up the controller qualification
process. Each operator should have a controller qualification program
that is specifically designed to address the particular attributes and
needs of its pipeline. The project team will recommend a specific set
of topic areas and content with a level of adequacy and thoroughness
expected of an operator's qualification program and associated
administrative processes. Project recommendations will address criteria
to determine adequate material content, a structured and encompassing
qualification process, and thoroughness and adequacy in an operator's
training, performance monitoring and periodic evaluation activities.
Each of these elements is discussed below.
Description of the Project Scope
PSIA-2002, Section 13(b) specifically uses the phrase ``persons who
use computers to control pipelines.'' Section 13(b) implies that an
elevated risk to the public would result from ineffective qualification
of persons who use computers to control pipelines. The Act does not
specifically identify or exclude any type of pipeline based on its
operating pressure, degree of sophistication, pipe mileage, or how
computers are used to control the pipeline system. Since the
application of computer technology is prolific, sophisticated computer
control systems (SCADA) have now been deployed in a wide variety of
applications, including individual remote stations, thereby defining
the range of the project beyond the traditional Supervisory Control and
Data Acquisition systems (SCADA) control room.
SCADA systems are used extensively in the pipeline industry. These
systems provide a means for controllers (an individual or team) to
monitor and control pipeline stations and other facilities. These
systems can provide remote control over great distances. Application of
SCADA systems has resulted in a reduction of pipeline field staffs,
making the role of the controller critical to safety and integrity in
pipeline operations. In cross-country hazardous liquid and gas
transmission pipelines, controllers routinely monitor and send commands
to change flow rates and pressures. Prompted by an assortment of
factors, hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipeline controllers are
re-directing flow, starting and stopping pipeline segments or adjusting
flow rates to accommodate market conditions, maintenance activity and
weather on a regional or sometimes national basis. For these types of
pipelines, dynamic operating conditions require controllers to have a
high level of knowledge, skills and abilities to safely maintain
systems and promptly recognize operating anomalies and abnormal
conditions as they develop.
Although the formal pilot program will place an emphasis on gas
transmission and hazardous liquid pipelines, OPS will be able to
address all of the following groups in the context of the project
report and recommendations:
Gas transmission pipeline controllers.
Hazardous liquid pipeline controllers.
Pipeline controllers who reside in gas compressor and
hazardous liquid pump stations.
Pipeline controllers who reside in LNG facilities, to the
extent they control pipelines.
LDC pipeline controllers.
The work of this project will then include consideration for the
qualification and potential need for certification processes related to
this broader set of pipeline controller personnel. OPS acknowledges the
differences in operating hydraulics and the role of controllers between
hazardous liquid and natural gas pipelines, and will take these
differences into consideration during the development of the project
and the eventual recommendations.
Identification of the Focus Group
A Focus Group of stakeholders was established early in the project,
including representatives of the public, industry trade associations,
pipeline operators, state pipeline safety agencies, academia and OPS.
Discussions with the Focus Group provided insight regarding key
operational and logistic considerations for the project. Information
came directly from the Focus Group participants and subsequently from
members of their respective constituencies. In addition, project
updates have been presented at several trade association meetings,
where additional feedback was attained. OPS will continue to use the
Focus Group throughout the term of the project.
Accident and Incident Review
Preliminary review of the NTSB incident/accident data indicates
that more detailed information regarding a controller's functions could
be collected as a part of accident and incident reporting, to permit a
more definitive analysis of controller involvement. Such additional
information would support a more thorough review in future analysis.
There are many other events for which reporting is not mandated by
current regulations, such as upset conditions, near-miss events,
situations that were averted by the operation of safety systems and
other operating anomalies that did not reach current reportable
thresholds. The tabulation and analysis of such events could provide
additional information to support a more thorough controller
performance review, metrics analysis, targeted or enhanced training and
general pipeline safety and integrity improvements. This additional
information could also be used to determine and/or substantiate the
adequacy of current controller qualification programs.
[[Page 19986]]
Survey of Industry Practices
OPS met with a broad cross-section of pipeline operators in the
fourth quarter of 2003 to learn what pipeline operators are currently
doing to meet existing operator qualification requirements for
controllers. OPS will be meeting with representatives of other
industries, additional pipeline operators and research organizations
during the course of the project to gather an expanded set of
information that will help develop and substantiate the recommendations
and conclusions of our report. The industry visits conducted to date
are tabulated in the docket.
As a result of these visits, pipeline control functions have been
categorized. Currently, principal control function categories are
defined as: full remote control, detect/monitor/direct field
operations, and detect/monitor/defer to field operations. In each case,
controllers were using computers to detect and monitor operations and
then either perform control functions themselves or direct or advise
field operations of needed attention based on the controller's
responsibility, authority and assessment of the situation. These
control function categories were developed to more clearly separate
operators into controller function groups.
Participation in B31Q (National Consensus Standard on Pipeline
Personnel Qualification)
OPS recognizes the ongoing effort to develop a more thorough,
consensus-based standard for gas and hazardous liquid pipeline
personnel qualification programs. The American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME) is now engaged in the development of a national
consensus standard entitled ASME B31Q, ``Pipeline Personnel
Qualification Standard.'' It is anticipated that this standard will
include qualification requirements for pipeline controllers who are
performing tasks influencing pipeline safety or integrity. It will also
incorporate a set of management practices intended to ensure that
personnel qualifications will be maintained so that they remain
current, and consistent with tasks performed. The completion of ASME
B31Q is imminent. Should ASME B31Q be completed within the time frame
of the Controller Certification project, there may be an opportunity to
select one or more operators to demonstrate and test applicable
elements of the B31Q's controller-related qualification requirements
during the pilot program.
Investigation of Controllers' Interaction with Computers
This project will also examine the interface and data presentation
characteristics of the computer systems that controllers use to operate
pipelines. This work will be supplemented by reviews of other
industrial control room settings. PHMSA/OPS acknowledges that this area
is beyond traditional personnel qualifications, but has identified that
this areas should be addressed as an aspect of the Congressional
recommendations and report due at the conclusion of this project. A
review of the adequacy and presentation of data through the computer
system will be limited to those areas that may affect the controller's
ability to accurately recognize and promptly react to abnormal
operating conditions, or those other conditions that may lead to
abnormal operating conditions. Specific areas of interest are not
necessarily limited to:
1. Access to sufficient pipeline system information.
2. Accuracy of the information provided.
3. Color pallet and number of colors used to convey information.
4. Interaction and navigation within the control system displays.
5. Initiation of controller commands.
6. Security from unauthorized commands and control.
7. Alarm and event configuration and management.
8. Recognition of control system degradation.
9. Alternative means of system monitoring and control in times of
system failures.
10. The conditions surrounding the testing of alternative means of
system monitoring and control.
Pilot Program
The PSIA directs that three operators be selected to formally
participate in the pilot program. The pilot program will be conducted
from the 2nd quarter of 2005 through the 1st quarter of 2006.
Information gathered during the industry survey indicated that many
local distribution company controllers advise and defer action to
district field operations personnel for needed control adjustments.
Therefore, the pilot program will focus on hazardous liquid and gas
transmission pipelines, and will not include an operator who is solely
a local distribution company. In addition to the three formal pilot
participants, additional operators of all types will be contacted
informally to provide supplemental information on practices, processes,
procedures and standards that are used, or could be used to demonstrate
controller qualification thoroughness and effectiveness. The similarity
of some controller function across all operator types will allow
certain portions of the report and recommendations to address all
pipeline operators.
The purpose of the Pilot Program is to: (1) Evaluate the
effectiveness of the practices and administrative processes currently
used by operators in the qualification of controllers; (2) review
training programs, qualification requirements, evaluation methods,
evaluation criteria, success thresholds, and re-evaluation intervals to
determine their adequacy and thoroughness in the controller
qualification process; and (3) explore how these processes and
evaluation criteria could be used to develop uniform protocols and
acceptance criteria for the certification of pipeline operators'
controller qualification processes. The pilot program will be used to
examine and evaluate:
1. Operators' procedures and practices for Operator Qualification
(OQ) regulations for pipeline controllers, including evaluation
practices and frequency, and other regulatory requirements.
2. Methods and metrics employed to measure and document ongoing
individual controller performance.
3. Operator studies or research (past or present) related to
controller qualifications, performance metrics or other related topics.
4. Measures in place to monitor individual controller performance
between formal periodic evaluations.
5. Benefits anticipated from voluntary candidate changes or
enhancements to controller qualifications requirements.
6. Administrative processes used to pre-screen potential
controllers, processes to suspend, revoke and restore a controller's
job assignment, and documentation to substantiate ongoing qualification
adequacy.
OPS invites pipeline operators to volunteer to participate in the
pilot program. Participation of pilot program operators will include
on-site observation by OPS representatives as further described in this
notice, and will also include discussions regarding the development of
project recommendations. Operators wishing to participate in the pilot
must submit descriptions of the controller qualification processes and
systems they are using to validate the training and proficiency of
their controllers. Operators may also include a brief description of
any new techniques that
[[Page 19987]]
they may wish to initiate and evaluate during the course of the pilots.
OPS will review candidate submissions to determine which three best
serve the objectives of the project. Operators wishing to participate
in the pilot program must submit information outlining the systems and
processes used in their controller qualification program by May 16,
2005. Details outlining the submittal process are further explained in
this document and in the docket.
During the pilot program period, OPS will monitor and evaluate
programs of the selected pilot operators to determine the value that
specific practices would add to an adequate qualification program, and
possibly a certification process. The pilot program will not include
operator qualification inspections of the pilot operators. OPS will
have an active dialog with the pilot operators on an ongoing basis,
review preliminary pilot findings with each pilot operator, and seek
their additional input before developing conclusions and
recommendations for the final report to Congress. Estimates of maximum
operator man-hour requirements for the pilots are included in the
docket.
OPS will also be studying research findings and will review
existing qualification and certification processes that are employed or
have been considered for aircraft pilots, aviation flight controllers
railroad engineers and train dispatchers. Other industries where
requirements and operating practices have similarities to pipeline
controllers may also be identified and reviewed.
In conjunction with the pilot program, the overall project team
will review recent incident and accident data to assure that the
activities of the pilot program and subsequent recommendations include
recognition of lessons learned from those events that may have been
attributed to, or aggravated by, controller involvement or lack of
action. This review will encompass a review of OPS records and NTSB
reports and recommendations. Control room personnel evaluation,
administration, certification and performance monitoring practices
employed for Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Air Traffic
Controllers and Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Rail System
operations will also be studied.
As required by PSIA, the resulting recommendations and other
criteria will be prepared as a final report and submitted to Congress
in December 2006. The report will focus on pipeline operators'
administrative and procedural processes that are, or could be, employed
to provide an elevated assurance that controllers possess adequate
knowledge, skills and abilities. The report may conclude that existing
or pending regulations and/or industry standards are adequate to ensure
qualified controllers, or that current regulations and/or industry
standards are not sufficient and additional measures are needed. The
report may also conclude that further study should be applied in
certain topical areas.
OPS will summarize the pilot results, merge other project findings
into the project report, and submit the report to Congress by December
17, 2006, as required by the PSIA.
The docket provides additional information regarding the pilot
program. Candidate pilot operators must be regulated under 49 CFR parts
192 and/or 195. A data form has been developed to assist candidate
operators in providing sufficient information to OPS regarding pilot
operator volunteers; this form is available in the docket.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60102, 60109, 60117.
Issued in Washington, DC on April 11, 2005.
Theodore L. Willke,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 05-7638 Filed 4-12-05; 4:27 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P