Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Mexico; Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, 19702-19708 [05-7336]
Download as PDF
19702
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 71 / Thursday, April 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the
analysis performed under various laws
and executive orders for the counterpart
Federal regulations.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the analysis performed under various
laws and executive orders for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
PART 946—VIRGINIA
1. The authority citation for part 946
continues to read as follows:
I
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 946
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
2. Section 946.15 is amended in the
table by adding a new entry in
chronological order by ‘‘Date of final
publication’’ to read as follows:
I
Dated: March 14, 2005.
Brent Wahlquist,
Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
For the reasons set out in the preamble,
30 CFR part 946 is amended as set forth
below:
I
§ 946.15 Approval of Virginia regulatory
program amendments.
*
*
Original amendment submission date
*
April 14, 2005 ...
*
Date of final
publication
*
*
*
*
July 20, 2004 .........................................................................................................................
*
[FR Doc. 05–7495 Filed 4–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R06–OAR–2005–NM–0001; FRL–7897–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; New
Mexico; Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EPA is approving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the Governor of New
Mexico on September 7, 2004. The
submittal revises the second ten-year
carbon monoxide (CO) maintenance
plan for the Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County, New Mexico area. The
submittal also revises the relevant parts
of the New Mexico Administrative Code
(NMAC) including revisions to the
General Provisions, Inspection and
Maintenance (I&M) Program, and the
contingency measures. We are
approving these revisions in accordance
with the requirements of the Federal
Clean Air Act (the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on June 13,
2005 without further notice, unless EPA
receives relevant adverse comment by
May 16, 2005. If EPA receives such
comment, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that this rule will
not take effect.
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:15 Apr 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
Submit your comments,
identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID No. R06–OAR–2005–
NM–0001, by one of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ Regional
Material in EDocket (RME), EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, is EPA’s preferred method for
receiving comments. Once in the
system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key
in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
U.S. EPA Region 6 ‘‘Contact Us’’ Web
site: https://epa.gov/region6/
r6coment.htm. Please click on ‘‘6PD’’
(Multimedia) and select ‘‘Air’’ before
submitting comments.
E-mail: Mr. Thomas Diggs at
diggs.thomas@epa.gov. Please also cc
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
Fax: Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD–L), at fax
number 214–665–7263.
Mail: Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD–L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733.
Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr. Thomas
Diggs, Chief, Air Planning Section
(6PD–L), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. Such
deliveries are accepted only between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays
except for legal holidays. Special
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Citation/description
*
4
VAC
801.18.
*
25–130–801.17
and
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Regional Material in EDocket (RME) ID
No. R06–OAR–2005–NM–0001. The
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
file without change, and may be made
available online at https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
the disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Do not submit information
through Regional Material in EDocket
(RME), regulations.gov, or e-mail if you
believe that it is CBI or otherwise
protected from disclosure. The EPA
RME Web site and the Federal
regulations.gov are ‘‘anonymous access’’
systems, which means EPA will not
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through RME or regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public file and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 71 / Thursday, April 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
Regional Material in EDocket (RME)
index at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or
in the official file which is available at
the Air Planning Section (6PD–L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733. The file will be made
available by appointment for public
inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review
Room between the hours of 8:30 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m. weekdays except for legal
holidays. Contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at
(214) 665–7253 to make an
appointment. If possible, please make
the appointment at least two working
days in advance of your visit. There will
be a 15 cent per page fee for making
photocopies of documents. On the day
of the visit, please check in at the EPA
Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
The State submittal is also available
for public inspection at the State Air
Agency listed below during official
business hours by appointment:
The City of Albuquerque,
Environmental Health Department, One
Civic Plaza, Albuquerque, NM 87102.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan Shar, Air Planning Section (6PD–
L), EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, telephone
(214) 665–6691, shar.alan@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Evaluation of New Mexico’s Submittal
A. Elements of a Limited Maintenance Plan
B. Control Measures in the Limited
Maintenance Plan
C. Part 20.11.1 NMAC, General Provisions
D. Part 20.11.100 NMAC, Motor Vehicle
Inspection—Decentralized
E. Part 20.11.102 NMAC, Oxygenated Fuels
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’
‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
I. Background
Under the 1990 Clean Air Act
Amendments, the Albuquerque/
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:15 Apr 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
Bernalillo County area was classified as
a moderate nonattainment area for CO.
On November 5, 1992, the State of New
Mexico submitted for EPA approval a
revision to the SIP to address the CO
pollution in the Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County area. Different aspects of this
SIP revision were approved at different
times by EPA, with the entire plan being
approved by the end of 1995 (see 58 FR
62535, 58 FR 67326, 59 FR 23167 and
60 FR 52641).
On April 14, 1995, New Mexico
submitted a request that the
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County
nonattainment area be redesignated to
attainment for CO. Along with this
request, the state submitted a
maintenance plan which demonstrated
that the area was expected to stay in
attainment of the CO National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for the
initial maintenance period of 1996–
2006. Included in the maintenance plan
was a commitment to update the plan
for a subsequent ten-year period (2006–
2016) no later than eight years after
redesignation to attainment by EPA. The
redesignation request and maintenance
plan were approved by EPA on June 13,
1996 (61 FR 29970). Subsequent
revisions to the maintenance plan were
submitted by New Mexico and
ultimately approved by EPA (see 61 FR
48404, 65 FR 33455 and 68 FR 58276).
Section 175A(b) of the Act as
amended in 1990 requires the state to
submit a subsequent maintenance plan
covering a second ten-year period to
EPA eight years after designation to
attainment. To fulfill this requirement of
the Act, and in response to a
commitment in the current maintenance
plan for the Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County area, the Governor of New
Mexico submitted the second ten-year
update of the CO maintenance plan to
EPA on September 7, 2004. See section
II of this document for our evaluation of
the CO maintenance plan.
On December 30, 2004 (69 FR 78312),
we published the recodification and
renumbering of the NMAC for the
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County.
Today, we are approving, as a part of
the SIP, the second ten-year carbon
monoxide (CO) maintenance plan for
the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County,
New Mexico area. In addition, we are
approving the relevant parts of the
NMAC for the Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County area that further support the
second ten-year maintenance plan for
CO within that area. Specifically, we are
approving revisions to title 20, chapter
11, parts 1 (General Provisions)
‘‘Definitions,’’ ‘‘Resolutions,’’ and
‘‘Interpretation,’’ 100 (Motor Vehicle
Inspection-Decentralized), and 102
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19703
(Oxygenated Fuels) of the NMAC. Our
Technical Support Document (TSD)
prepared in conjunction with this SIP
revision contains detailed information
concerning our evaluation of each one
of these parts.
II. Evaluation of New Mexico’s
Submittal
On September 7, 2004, the State of
New Mexico submitted a revision to the
SIP for Bernalillo County. This revision
provides the second 10-year update to
the maintenance plan for the area, as
required by the section 175A(b) of the
Act. The purpose of this plan is to
ensure continued maintenance of the
NAAQS for carbon monoxide in
Bernalillo County by demonstrating that
future emissions of this criteria
pollutant are expected to remain at or
below emission levels necessary for
continued attainment of the CO
NAAQS.
Since there are few specific content
requirements defined in section 175A of
the Act for maintenance plans, EPA has
exercised its discretion in determining
the required content and has a Limited
Maintenance Plan policy in effect for
areas that can demonstrate consistent air
quality at or below 85% of the NAAQS
for carbon monoxide. Other criteria for
the Limited Maintenance Plan approach
are detailed in the EPA guidance
memorandum, ‘‘Limited Maintenance
Plan Option for Nonclassifiable CO
Nonattainment Areas’’ from Joseph
Paisie, Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards, dated October 6, 1995.
The Albuquerque/Bernalillo County
area has opted to develop a Limited
Maintenance Plan to fulfill the second
ten-year maintenance period required
by the Act.
Pursuant to this approach, EPA will
consider the maintenance
demonstration satisfied if the
monitoring data show the 8-hour CO
design value is at or below 7.65 parts
per million (ppm), or 85% of the 8-hour
CO NAAQS of 9 ppm. In addition, the
1-hour CO design value must be at or
below 29.75 ppm, or 85% of the 1-hour
CO NAAQS of 35 ppm. The EPA
believes that if the area begins the
maintenance period at or below 85% of
the applicable NAAQS, the continuing
applicability of PSD and other Federal
measures along with the existing control
measures already adopted should
provide adequate assurance of
maintenance of the NAAQS over the
ten-year period. The last monitored
violation of the CO NAAQS in
Bernalillo County occurred in December
of 1991 and monitored CO levels have
been steadily in decline ever since. For
this submission, the state provided data
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
19704
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 71 / Thursday, April 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
showing monitored CO values from
1994–2003, reflecting 2003 design
values of 3.9 ppm and 9.6 ppm of the
8-hour and 1-hour CO standards,
respectively. These values, well below
the 85% threshold, render the
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County
maintenance area eligible for the
Limited Maintenance Plan option.
A. Elements of a Limited Maintenance
Plan
A Limited Maintenance Plan consists
of several core provisions per the
Limited Maintenance Plan Guidance
memo: an attainment inventory, a
demonstration of maintenance of the CO
NAAQS, operation of a monitoring
network, a provision for contingency
measures, a discussion of the approach
necessary to meet conformity
requirements, and a commitment to
develop a full maintenance plan upon
violation of the NAAQS.
Emission inventories contain
estimates of how much CO is produced
by all categories in the maintenance area
on an annual basis: on-road mobile
sources, off-road mobile sources, area
sources and stationary sources. As part
of the currently approved maintenance
plan, Bernalillo County has produced
Periodic Emissions Inventories (PEIs)
for CO every three years, and approved
PEIs exist for 1993, 1996, and 1999. The
2002 PEI is currently under review but
is not required for approval of a limited
maintenance plan. These emission
inventories establish the baseline
amount of emissions, which is the
amount of CO in tons per day under
which an area’s emissions must remain
in order to not exceed the NAAQS for
CO. The submitted attainment year
inventory was developed from the
previous 1993 CO attainment inventory.
Since 1993 was a year in which
Bernalillo County did not violate the CO
NAAQS, this inventory remains
applicable as the baseline CO inventory.
The attainment inventory was
developed following EPA guidance, and
therefore is approvable for the Limited
Maintenance Plan. Under the Limited
Maintenance Plan option a cap on total
emissions is not needed during the
maintenance period (2006–2016).
However, the State provided the draft
2002 PEI estimates for informational
purposes with this SIP revision. The
estimates from the table below are from
the 2002 PEI still under review.
Although we do not expect major
changes, some fine-tuning and revision
of emissions estimates may occur.
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:15 Apr 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
the area was redesignated to attainment
in 1996, thus these contingency
measures have never been triggered.
With this submission, the State is
Tons per
Source category
day (tpd) revising the contingency measures and
trigger for Bernalillo County. The
On-road Mobile .............................
364.14 contingency requirement to implement
Off-road Mobile .............................
34.45 an annual Inspection and Maintenance
Area ..............................................
71.51
Stationary ......................................
3.24 Program is being eliminated. The
contingency requirement to increase the
Total .......................................
473.34 oxygenate concentration in fuels from
2.7% to 3%, by weight, will remain in
place. Instead of the contingency trigger
The State has chosen to demonstrate
being a monitored CO violation, it will
maintenance of the NAAQS by
be triggered if an air quality monitor
continued monitoring of the air quality
indicates that the 85% CO NAAQS
in Bernalillo County. To qualify for the
threshold has been exceeded. This
Limited Maintenance Plan option, the
oxygenated fuel contingency measure
design value for each monitor must be
will be implemented no later than
at or below 85% of the 8-hour and 1November 1st following activation of
hour CO NAAQS. The values
corresponding to this 85% threshold are the contingency trigger. The State rule
(20.11.102 NMAC) has been updated to
7.65 ppm for the 8-hour CO standard
reflect this change to the contingency
and 29.75 ppm for the 1-hour CO
trigger. We believe that the new stricter
NAAQS. The 2003 design values for
trigger and one control measure are as
Bernalillo County are 3.9 ppm and 9.6
protective as the previously-approved
ppm for the 8-hour and 1-hour
trigger and two control measures.
standards, respectively. Thus, the
Therefore, the revised contingency
design value for the 8-hour standard is
measures plan is being approved.
less than 44% of the CO NAAQS and
Finally, in the event that a violation
the design value for the 1-hour standard
is less than 28% of the CO NAAQS. The of the CO NAAQS occurs, the State has
committed to development and
EPA believes that if an area begins the
maintenance period at or below the 85% submission of a full maintenance plan
within 12 months of EPA certification of
threshold, it is unreasonable to expect
the monitored violation. This plan
that so much growth will occur during
would supercede the Limited
the ten-year maintenance period to
Maintenance Plan. [Note that the State
cause a violation of the NAAQS.
submittal reflects on p.15 an 18-month
Therefore, we find that the State
demonstrates continued maintenance of time frame for submittal of a full
maintenance plan following a violation
the standard.
of the NAAQS. However, elsewhere in
The Plan includes a commitment to
the State submittal (see p. 13), the 12maintain operation of the existing EPAmonth commitment is stated.] The EPA
approved air quality monitoring
network in accordance with 40 CFR part was informed by the State that the 18month time frame is a typographical
58. The Environmental Health
error and therefore we are approving the
Department of the City of Albuquerque
will continue to monitor CO through the State’s commitment to submit a full
end of the second ten-year maintenance maintenance plan within 12 months of
EPA certification of the monitored
period to ensure the CO level remains
violation.
below 85% of the NAAQS. This data
Section 176(c) of the Act defines
will be reported to EPA annually.
conformity as actions that do not
Section 175A of the Act requires that
a maintenance plan include contingency interfere with the SIP’s purpose of
eliminating or reducing the severity and
provisions to promptly correct any
violation of the NAAQS that occurs after number of NAAQS violations. It also
says that actions cannot cause or
redesignation of the area to attainment.
contribute to any new violation or delay
Contingency measures are specific
attainment or any milestones. In most
control strategies that will be activated
nonattainment and maintenance areas
if they are triggered by a predefined
event. Under the current EPA-approved this is shown by regional emissions
plan, two contingency measures were
analyses that demonstrate that estimated
incorporated: an annual Inspection and
emissions from the proposed project(s)
Maintenance Program versus the current are expected to be below a defined
biennial program and an increase in the emissions budget contained in the
oxygenate content in fuels from 2.7% to State’s SIP, or by an interim emissions
3%. The current EPA-approved plan’s
test prior to availability of emissions
trigger for these contingency measures is budgets. However, in areas with
a monitored CO violation. There have
adequate or approved Limited
been no violations at any monitor since
Maintenance Plans, emissions budgets
TABLE I.—CO EMISSIONS BY SOURCE
CATEGORY, 2002
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 71 / Thursday, April 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
are treated as essentially not
constraining for the length of the
maintenance plan as long as the area
continues to meet the Limited
Maintenance Plan criteria. The EPA
believes there is no reason to expect that
these areas will experience so much
growth that a violation of the CO
NAAQS would result. Therefore, for
areas meeting the Limited Maintenance
Plan criteria, all Federal actions that
require conformity determinations are
considered to have satisfied the regional
emissions analysis requirement of the
conformity regulations. Since these
areas are still maintenance areas;
however, other aspects of the
transportation conformity regulations
still apply. Specifically, such areas must
demonstrate that the metropolitan
transportation plans and transportation
improvement programs are fiscally
constrained (40 CFR part 108) and that
any Transportation Control Measures in
the SIP are being implemented
according to the conformity rule (40
CFR 93.113). Additionally, for most
transportation projects in limited
maintenance areas, a CO ‘‘hot spot’’
analysis will still be required,
incorporating the latest planning
assumptions and using the latest
available EPA-approved emissions
model.
B. Control Measures in the Limited
Maintenance Plan
The CO control program for Bernalillo
County is comprised of both Federal
and local measures. The current
maintenance plan for the area includes
several control strategies that will
remain in place for the duration of the
second ten-year maintenance period of
2006–2016. The Federal strategies
expected are continued implementation
of the Tier 2 motor vehicle emission
standards along with the requirement
for reduced sulfur in gasoline, which
became effective on February 10, 2000
(65 FR 6697). Additionally, EPA’s newly
approved non-road rule (69 FR 38957;
June 29, 2004) will regulate non-road
diesel engines and diesel fuel. This rule
incorporates new emission standards,
based on advanced emission control
devices, for non-road diesel engines and
will result in significant reductions in
several criteria pollutants, including
CO. As newer vehicles gradually replace
older ones in the fleet, these control
programs will result in lowered CO
emissions in the Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County area and elsewhere.
Local control strategies remaining in
place for the duration of the second tenyear maintenance plan include an I&M
Program, Oxygenated Fuels Program,
Woodburning Control Program, and the
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:15 Apr 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
Program (PSD). The I&M program has
been in effect in Bernalillo County since
1989. The I&M SIP requires biennial
emissions testing of 1975 and newer
vehicles with a 2-speed idle test. For
more information on the I&M SIP
revision see section D of this document
and our TSD. Today, we are approving
revisions to the I&M SIP that, among
other things, includes annual testing of
1975 through 1985 vehicles. The annual
testing of older vehicles is designed to
reduce CO emissions from the on-road
mobile sector by identifying highemitting vehicles and requiring repair.
Failure to do so, as with all failing
vehicles, will result in vehicles not
being issued a registration renewal. The
biennial testing of 1986 and newer
vehicles will continue. In addition, nonBernalillo County vehicles used for
commuting into Bernalillo County for
sixty or more days per year will now be
required to be tested. The combined
annual/biennial program as described
above with the revisions discussed
below in section C, will remain in place
for the duration of the second ten-year
maintenance period (2006–2016).
The Oxygenated Fuels Program aims
to reduce vehicle emissions by
providing for the use of oxygenated
fuels. Various forms of this program
have been in place during the Winter
months (November 15 through
February) since 1988. The minimum
oxygenate content of Winter fuels in
Bernalillo County is 2.7% by weight,
and this requirement will remain in
effect for the duration of the second tenyear (2006–2016) maintenance period.
Another local control strategy is the
Woodburning Control Program, which
initially began during the winter of
1988. Because poor air dispersion
combined with high CO emissions from
woodburning activities can contribute to
elevated CO levels, the Environmental
Health Department of the City of
Albuquerque uses weather forecast
information to declare ‘‘no burn’’
periods which restrict woodburning
activity in Bernalillo County. This
control program will remain in effect for
the duration of the second ten-year
maintenance period.
The PSD program is a control program
that has been approved into the
Bernalillo County SIP for local
implementation. This program has been
in effect for CO since Bernalillo County
was redesignated to attainment in 1996.
Under this program, new stationary
sources of CO are evaluated and are
required to use the Best Available
Control Technology (BACT) to control
emissions. This program will continue
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19705
as a control strategy during the second
maintenance period of 2006–2016.
Based on above evaluation, outlined
in sections A and B, this SIP revision
satisfies the requirements of the Act as
amended in 1990 for the second tenyear update to the Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County CO maintenance area.
C. Part 20.11.1 NMAC, General
Provisions
The title 20, chapter 11, part 1,
General Provisions, was submitted to us
for approval by the Governor of New
Mexico, in a letter dated September 7,
2004, on behalf of the Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County, Environmental
Health Department. The proposed title
20, chapter 11, part 1, General
Provisions, contains three sections titled
‘‘Resolution,’’ ‘‘Definitions,’’ and
‘‘Interpretation.’’ The EPA initially
approved Regulation 1 (Resolution) of
the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County,
New Mexico on 04/10/1980 (45 FR
24468). See 40 CFR 52.1620(c)(11). The
EPA initially approved Regulation 2
(Definitions) on 04/10/1980 (45 FR
24468). Further revisions to Regulation
2 were later approved by EPA on 12/21/
93 (54 FR 67330). See 40 CFR
52.1620(c)(53). The EPA initially
approved Regulation 26 (Interpretation)
on 02/23/1993 (58 FR 10972). See 40
CFR 52.1620 (c)(49). The proposed
revisions to ‘‘Resolution,’’
‘‘Definitions,’’ and ‘‘Interpretation’’
reflect the new format and renumbering
of the NMAC. The proposed revisions
also reflect renaming of ‘‘Regulation’’ to
‘‘Part.’’ These changes are
administrative in nature, and do not
change the text of the SIP-approved
rules. We published our approval of the
recodification and renumbering of
chapter 11 on December 30, 2004 (69 FR
78312). Therefore, these revisions are
being approved today. The proposed
revisions may be found at: https://
www.nmcpr.state.nm.us/nmac/_title20/
T20C011.htm.
D. Part 20.11.100 NMAC, Motor Vehicle
Inspection-Decentralized
As a moderate nonattainment area for
CO, the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County
area was required to implement a basic
vehicle I&M program. The latest version
of the I&M SIP for this program was
approved by EPA on June 13, 1996 (61
FR 29970), along with the area
redesignation to attainment for CO. The
program consists of a decentralized
network of ‘‘test only’’ and ‘‘test and
repair’’ stations. One of the submitted
revisions is that vehicles model years
1975–1985 are tested annually instead
of biennially with a 2-speed idle test.
Vehicles model years 1986–1995 will
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
19706
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 71 / Thursday, April 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
continue to be tested biennially with a
2-speed idle test. Vehicles model years
1996 and newer will be tested
biennially consistent with the new Onboard Diagnostic testing required by the
Act. Revisions to this SIP also include
adding a gas cap pressure test, and
exempting the first four years for new
vehicles from testing. Language
clarification, minor format changes, and
some innovative measures are also
included. An example of an innovative
measure is commuter vehicles which
are more than four years old and are
driven into Bernalillo County for 60 or
more days per year are now subject to
I&M testing. For further information
about the changes to the program, see
the TSD.
The revisions made to the 20.11.100
NMAC, Motor Vehicle InspectionDecentralized for the Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County area are consistent
with the requirements of the Act, the
Federal Inspection and Maintenance
rules in 40 CFR 51 subpart S, do not
weaken, but rather strengthen the
existing federally approved SIP.
Therefore, these revisions are being
approved today.
E. Part 20.11.102 NMAC, Oxygenated
Fuels
The initial EPA-approved revision to
the SIP concerning oxygenated fuels
program for the Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County utilizing ethanol was approved
on November 29, 1993 (58 FR 62535).
Various forms of this program have been
in place during the Winter months
(November 1 through February) since
1988. The current SIP revision requires
a minimum oxygenate concentrate of
Winter fuels of 2.7% by weight in the
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County
(November 1 through February).
In a letter dated September 7, 2004,
the Governor of New Mexico submitted
a request to revise the current carbon
monoxide maintenance plan for the
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County area.
This request, among others as described
above, was to incorporate the revised
regulation 20.22.102 NMAC,
Oxygenated Fuels, which only applies
to the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County
area. The Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County Air Control Board adopted the
amended regulation on July 14, 2004,
after a public comment period and
public hearing conducted on June 9,
2004. The amended regulation became
locally effective on September 1, 2004.
The SIP revision submitted provides
minor grammatical and typographical
changes to the current EPA-approved
Oxygenated Fuels program. These
changes are administrative in nature
and are approvable. Therefore, we are
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:15 Apr 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
approving the revisions to the
Oxygenated Fuels Program into the SIP.
As noted and previously discussed in
section A, the State also submitted a
request for the revision of the current
contingency measures plan in the
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County
maintenance plan approved on June 13,
1996 (61 FR 29970). The oxygenated
fuels’ contingency measure functions in
2 phases.
The first contingency measure phase,
July 1, 1995 until June 13, 2006, or
when EPA has approved this SIP
revision regarding the second half of the
carbon monoxide maintenance plan for
Bernalillo county, increases the
oxygenate concentration in gasoline
from 2.7% to 3.0%, by weight, for
ethanol in the event the area exceeds the
CO NAAQS. The increase in oxygenate
concentration will occur beginning
November 1 immediately following the
period of violation and will continue
every subsequent winter pollution
season. The winter pollution season
lasts from November through February.
The second contingency measure
phase, June 13, 2006 until June 13,
2016, or when EPA has approved this
SIP revision regarding the second half of
the CO maintenance plan for
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County,
whichever is sooner increases the
oxygenate concentration in gasoline
from 2.7% to 3.0%, by weight, for
ethanol in the event the area exceeds
85% of the CO NAAQS. The increase in
oxygenate concentration will occur
beginning November 1 immediately
following the period in which the area
exceeded 85% of the CO NAAQS and
continues every subsequent winter
pollution season.
The EPA performed an analysis of the
Albuquerque/ Bernalillo County Air
Control Board’s submission and
determined that it meets the applicable
requirements of the Act, and EPA’s
regulations, and is consistent with our
policies. The implementation of the
oxygenated fuels contingency measure
triggered at 85% of the NAAQS for
carbon monoxide will provide for the
reduction in the probability of the area
falling into nonattainment. Therefore,
we are approving the revisions to the
Oxygenated Fuels rule. Our TSD
prepared in conjunction with today’s
action contains more information
concerning this rulemaking.
III. Final Action
The EPA is approving the
aforementioned changes to New
Mexico’s Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County SIP because the revisions are
consistent with the Act and EPA
regulatory requirements. The EPA is
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
publishing this rule without prior
proposal because the EPA views this as
a non-controversial submittal and
anticipates no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register publication,
EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to
approve the SIP revision should adverse
comments be filed. This rule will be
effective June 13, 2005 without further
notice, unless EPA receives relevant
adverse comment by May 16, 2005.
If the EPA receives such comments,
then EPA will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments
received will then be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period.
Parties interested in commenting should
do so at this time. If no such comments
are received, the public is advised that
this rule will be effective on June 13,
2005, and no further action will be
taken on the proposed rule.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
19707
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 71 / Thursday, April 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by June 13, 2005.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: March 31, 2005.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart GG—New Mexico
2. Section 52.1620 is amended as
follows:
I a. In paragraph (c), in the second table
entitled ‘‘EPA Approved Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County, NM Regulations,’’ by
revising the entries for parts 1, 100, and
102.
I b. In paragraph (e), in the second table
entitled ‘‘EPA Approved Nonregulatory
Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory
Measures in the New Mexico SIP’’ by
adding one new entry to the end of the
table.
I
§ 52.1620
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA APPROVED ALBUQUERQUE/BERNALILLO COUNTY, NM REGULATIONS
State citation
State approval/effective
date
Title/subject
EPA approval date
Explanation
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, Air Quality Control Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC) Title 20—Environment Protection, Chapter 11—Albuquerque/Bernalillo County Air Quality Control
Board
Part 1 (20.11.1 NMAC) ..
General Provisions .............................................
09/07/04
*
Part 100 (20.11.100
NMAC).
*
*
*
Motor Vehicle Inspection—Decentralized ..........
09/07/04
Part 102 (20.11.102
NMAC).
Oxygenated Fuels ..............................................
09/07/04
*
*
*
VerDate jul<14>2003
*
*
*
*
*
14:15 Apr 13, 2005
*
04/14/05 [Insert FR
page where document begins].
*
*
04/14/05 [Insert FR
page where document begins].
04/14/05 [Insert FR
page where document begins].
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
19708
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 71 / Thursday, April 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
EPA APPROVED NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE NEW MEXICO SIP
Applicable geographic or nonattainment area
State submittal
date/effective
date
*
*
*
Second 10-year maintenance
Bernalillo County ....................
plan (limited maintenance
plan) for Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County.
*
09/07/04
Name of SIP provision
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 52.1627 is amended by
designating the existing text as paragraph
(a) and by adding paragraph (b) to read
as follows:
I
§ 52.1627 Control strategy and
regulations: Carbon monoxide.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Approval—The Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County carbon monoxide
limited maintenance plan revision dated
September 7, 2004, meets the
requirements of section 172 of the Clean
Air Act, and is therefore approved.
[FR Doc. 05–7336 Filed 4–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 041126332–5039–02; I.D.
041105A]
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Reallocation of
Pacific Cod in the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Reallocation.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS is reallocating the
projected unused amount of Pacific cod
from vessels using jig gear to catcher
vessels less than 60 feet (18.3 meters
(m)) length overall (LOA) using pot or
hook-and-line gear in the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands management area
(BSAI). These actions are necessary to
allow the 2005 A season total allowable
catch (TAC) of Pacific cod to be
harvested.
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:15 Apr 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
EPA approval date
*
04/14/05 [Insert FR page
where document begins].
Effective April 13, 2005, through
2400 hrs, Alaska local time (A.l.t.),
December 31, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Furuness, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
manages the groundfish fishery in the
BSAI according to the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area (FMP) prepared by
the North Pacific Fishery Management
Council under authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act.
Regulations governing fishing by U.S.
vessels in accordance with the FMP
appear at subpart H of 50 CFR part 600
and 50 CFR part 679.
The 2005 A season allowance of the
Pacific cod TAC specified for vessels
using jig gear in the BSAI is 1,524
metric tons (mt) as established by the
2005 and 2006 final harvest
specifications for groundfish in the
BSAI (70 FR 8979, February 24, 2005),
for the period 1200 hrs, A.l.t., January
1, 2005, through 1200 hrs, A.l.t., April
30, 2005. See §§ 679.20(a)(7)(i)(C)(1),
(c)(3)(iii), and (c)(5).
As of April 1, 2005, the
Administrator, Alaska Region, NMFS,
has determined that jig vessels will not
be able to harvest 1,150 mt of the A
season apportionment of Pacific cod
allocated to those vessels under
§§ 679.20(a)(7)(i)(A) and (a)(7)(iii)(A).
Therefore, in accordance with
§ 679.20(a)(7)(ii)(C)(1), NMFS
apportions 1,150 mt of Pacific cod from
the A season apportionment of jig gear
to catcher vessels less than 60 feet (18.3
m) LOA using pot or hook-and-line gear.
The harvest specifications for Pacific
cod included in the harvest
specifications for groundfish in the
BSAI (70 FR 8979, February 24, 2005)
are revised as follows: 374 mt to the A
season apportionment for vessels using
jig gear and 2,504 mt to catcher vessels
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Explanation
*
*
less than 60 feet (18.3 m) LOA using pot
or hook-and-line gear.
Classification
This action responds to the best
available information recently obtained
from the fishery. The Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA
(AA), finds good cause to waive the
requirement to provide prior notice and
opportunity for public comment
pursuant to the authority set forth at 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B) as such requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. This requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest as it would prevent NMFS from
responding to the most recent fisheries
data in a timely fashion and would
delay the reallocation of Pacific cod
specified for jig vessels to catcher
vessels less than 60 feet (18.3 m) LOA
using pot or hook-and-line gear and
therefore would cause disruption to the
industry by requiring unnecessary
closures, disruption within the fishing
industry and the potential for regulatory
discards when the current allocation is
projected to be reached on April 2,
2005. This reallocation will relieve a
restriction on the industry and allow for
the orderly conduct and efficient
operation of this fishery.
The AA also finds good cause to
waive the 30-day delay in the effective
date of this action under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). This finding is based upon
the reasons provided above for waiver of
prior notice and opportunity for public
comment.
This action is required by § 679.20
and is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: April 11, 2005.
Galen R. Tromble
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–7513 Filed 4–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 71 (Thursday, April 14, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19702-19708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7336]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R06-OAR-2005-NM-0001; FRL-7897-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
New Mexico; Albuquerque/Bernalillo County
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is approving State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the Governor of New Mexico on September 7, 2004. The
submittal revises the second ten-year carbon monoxide (CO) maintenance
plan for the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, New Mexico area. The
submittal also revises the relevant parts of the New Mexico
Administrative Code (NMAC) including revisions to the General
Provisions, Inspection and Maintenance (I&M) Program, and the
contingency measures. We are approving these revisions in accordance
with the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on June 13, 2005 without further notice,
unless EPA receives relevant adverse comment by May 16, 2005. If EPA
receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID No. R06-OAR-2005-NM-0001, by one of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ Regional Material in
EDocket (RME), EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, is
EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. Once in the system,
select ``quick search,'' then key in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
U.S. EPA Region 6 ``Contact Us'' Web site: https://epa.gov/region6/
r6coment.htm. Please click on ``6PD'' (Multimedia) and select ``Air''
before submitting comments.
E-mail: Mr. Thomas Diggs at diggs.thomas@epa.gov. Please also cc
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
Fax: Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-L), at fax
number 214-665-7263.
Mail: Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas,
Texas 75202-2733.
Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air Planning
Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Such deliveries are accepted only
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays except for legal
holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Regional Material in EDocket
(RME) ID No. R06-OAR-2005-NM-0001. The EPA's policy is that all
comments received will be included in the public file without change,
and may be made available online at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information the disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Do not submit information through Regional Material in EDocket
(RME), regulations.gov, or e-mail if you believe that it is CBI or
otherwise protected from disclosure. The EPA RME Web site and the
Federal regulations.gov are ``anonymous access'' systems, which means
EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to EPA without going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-
mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public file and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form
[[Page 19703]]
of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
Regional Material in EDocket (RME) index at https://docket.epa.gov/
rmepub/. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or in the official file which is
available at the Air Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. The file
will be made available by appointment for public inspection in the
Region 6 FOIA Review Room between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
weekdays except for legal holidays. Contact the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at
(214) 665-7253 to make an appointment. If possible, please make the
appointment at least two working days in advance of your visit. There
will be a 15 cent per page fee for making photocopies of documents. On
the day of the visit, please check in at the EPA Region 6 reception
area at 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
The State submittal is also available for public inspection at the
State Air Agency listed below during official business hours by
appointment:
The City of Albuquerque, Environmental Health Department, One Civic
Plaza, Albuquerque, NM 87102.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Shar, Air Planning Section (6PD-
L), EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone
(214) 665-6691, shar.alan@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Evaluation of New Mexico's Submittal
A. Elements of a Limited Maintenance Plan
B. Control Measures in the Limited Maintenance Plan
C. Part 20.11.1 NMAC, General Provisions
D. Part 20.11.100 NMAC, Motor Vehicle Inspection--Decentralized
E. Part 20.11.102 NMAC, Oxygenated Fuels
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to EPA.
I. Background
Under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, the Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County area was classified as a moderate nonattainment area
for CO. On November 5, 1992, the State of New Mexico submitted for EPA
approval a revision to the SIP to address the CO pollution in the
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County area. Different aspects of this SIP
revision were approved at different times by EPA, with the entire plan
being approved by the end of 1995 (see 58 FR 62535, 58 FR 67326, 59 FR
23167 and 60 FR 52641).
On April 14, 1995, New Mexico submitted a request that the
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County nonattainment area be redesignated to
attainment for CO. Along with this request, the state submitted a
maintenance plan which demonstrated that the area was expected to stay
in attainment of the CO National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
for the initial maintenance period of 1996-2006. Included in the
maintenance plan was a commitment to update the plan for a subsequent
ten-year period (2006-2016) no later than eight years after
redesignation to attainment by EPA. The redesignation request and
maintenance plan were approved by EPA on June 13, 1996 (61 FR 29970).
Subsequent revisions to the maintenance plan were submitted by New
Mexico and ultimately approved by EPA (see 61 FR 48404, 65 FR 33455 and
68 FR 58276).
Section 175A(b) of the Act as amended in 1990 requires the state to
submit a subsequent maintenance plan covering a second ten-year period
to EPA eight years after designation to attainment. To fulfill this
requirement of the Act, and in response to a commitment in the current
maintenance plan for the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County area, the
Governor of New Mexico submitted the second ten-year update of the CO
maintenance plan to EPA on September 7, 2004. See section II of this
document for our evaluation of the CO maintenance plan.
On December 30, 2004 (69 FR 78312), we published the recodification
and renumbering of the NMAC for the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County.
Today, we are approving, as a part of the SIP, the second ten-year
carbon monoxide (CO) maintenance plan for the Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County, New Mexico area. In addition, we are approving the relevant
parts of the NMAC for the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County area that
further support the second ten-year maintenance plan for CO within that
area. Specifically, we are approving revisions to title 20, chapter 11,
parts 1 (General Provisions) ``Definitions,'' ``Resolutions,'' and
``Interpretation,'' 100 (Motor Vehicle Inspection-Decentralized), and
102 (Oxygenated Fuels) of the NMAC. Our Technical Support Document
(TSD) prepared in conjunction with this SIP revision contains detailed
information concerning our evaluation of each one of these parts.
II. Evaluation of New Mexico's Submittal
On September 7, 2004, the State of New Mexico submitted a revision
to the SIP for Bernalillo County. This revision provides the second 10-
year update to the maintenance plan for the area, as required by the
section 175A(b) of the Act. The purpose of this plan is to ensure
continued maintenance of the NAAQS for carbon monoxide in Bernalillo
County by demonstrating that future emissions of this criteria
pollutant are expected to remain at or below emission levels necessary
for continued attainment of the CO NAAQS.
Since there are few specific content requirements defined in
section 175A of the Act for maintenance plans, EPA has exercised its
discretion in determining the required content and has a Limited
Maintenance Plan policy in effect for areas that can demonstrate
consistent air quality at or below 85% of the NAAQS for carbon
monoxide. Other criteria for the Limited Maintenance Plan approach are
detailed in the EPA guidance memorandum, ``Limited Maintenance Plan
Option for Nonclassifiable CO Nonattainment Areas'' from Joseph Paisie,
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, dated October 6, 1995.
The Albuquerque/Bernalillo County area has opted to develop a Limited
Maintenance Plan to fulfill the second ten-year maintenance period
required by the Act.
Pursuant to this approach, EPA will consider the maintenance
demonstration satisfied if the monitoring data show the 8-hour CO
design value is at or below 7.65 parts per million (ppm), or 85% of the
8-hour CO NAAQS of 9 ppm. In addition, the 1-hour CO design value must
be at or below 29.75 ppm, or 85% of the 1-hour CO NAAQS of 35 ppm. The
EPA believes that if the area begins the maintenance period at or below
85% of the applicable NAAQS, the continuing applicability of PSD and
other Federal measures along with the existing control measures already
adopted should provide adequate assurance of maintenance of the NAAQS
over the ten-year period. The last monitored violation of the CO NAAQS
in Bernalillo County occurred in December of 1991 and monitored CO
levels have been steadily in decline ever since. For this submission,
the state provided data
[[Page 19704]]
showing monitored CO values from 1994-2003, reflecting 2003 design
values of 3.9 ppm and 9.6 ppm of the 8-hour and 1-hour CO standards,
respectively. These values, well below the 85% threshold, render the
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County maintenance area eligible for the Limited
Maintenance Plan option.
A. Elements of a Limited Maintenance Plan
A Limited Maintenance Plan consists of several core provisions per
the Limited Maintenance Plan Guidance memo: an attainment inventory, a
demonstration of maintenance of the CO NAAQS, operation of a monitoring
network, a provision for contingency measures, a discussion of the
approach necessary to meet conformity requirements, and a commitment to
develop a full maintenance plan upon violation of the NAAQS.
Emission inventories contain estimates of how much CO is produced
by all categories in the maintenance area on an annual basis: on-road
mobile sources, off-road mobile sources, area sources and stationary
sources. As part of the currently approved maintenance plan, Bernalillo
County has produced Periodic Emissions Inventories (PEIs) for CO every
three years, and approved PEIs exist for 1993, 1996, and 1999. The 2002
PEI is currently under review but is not required for approval of a
limited maintenance plan. These emission inventories establish the
baseline amount of emissions, which is the amount of CO in tons per day
under which an area's emissions must remain in order to not exceed the
NAAQS for CO. The submitted attainment year inventory was developed
from the previous 1993 CO attainment inventory. Since 1993 was a year
in which Bernalillo County did not violate the CO NAAQS, this inventory
remains applicable as the baseline CO inventory. The attainment
inventory was developed following EPA guidance, and therefore is
approvable for the Limited Maintenance Plan. Under the Limited
Maintenance Plan option a cap on total emissions is not needed during
the maintenance period (2006-2016). However, the State provided the
draft 2002 PEI estimates for informational purposes with this SIP
revision. The estimates from the table below are from the 2002 PEI
still under review. Although we do not expect major changes, some fine-
tuning and revision of emissions estimates may occur.
Table I.--CO Emissions by Source Category, 2002
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tons per
Source category day (tpd)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On-road Mobile............................................... 364.14
Off-road Mobile.............................................. 34.45
Area......................................................... 71.51
Stationary................................................... 3.24
----------
Total.................................................... 473.34
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The State has chosen to demonstrate maintenance of the NAAQS by
continued monitoring of the air quality in Bernalillo County. To
qualify for the Limited Maintenance Plan option, the design value for
each monitor must be at or below 85% of the 8-hour and 1-hour CO NAAQS.
The values corresponding to this 85% threshold are 7.65 ppm for the 8-
hour CO standard and 29.75 ppm for the 1-hour CO NAAQS. The 2003 design
values for Bernalillo County are 3.9 ppm and 9.6 ppm for the 8-hour and
1-hour standards, respectively. Thus, the design value for the 8-hour
standard is less than 44% of the CO NAAQS and the design value for the
1-hour standard is less than 28% of the CO NAAQS. The EPA believes that
if an area begins the maintenance period at or below the 85% threshold,
it is unreasonable to expect that so much growth will occur during the
ten-year maintenance period to cause a violation of the NAAQS.
Therefore, we find that the State demonstrates continued maintenance of
the standard.
The Plan includes a commitment to maintain operation of the
existing EPA-approved air quality monitoring network in accordance with
40 CFR part 58. The Environmental Health Department of the City of
Albuquerque will continue to monitor CO through the end of the second
ten-year maintenance period to ensure the CO level remains below 85% of
the NAAQS. This data will be reported to EPA annually.
Section 175A of the Act requires that a maintenance plan include
contingency provisions to promptly correct any violation of the NAAQS
that occurs after redesignation of the area to attainment. Contingency
measures are specific control strategies that will be activated if they
are triggered by a predefined event. Under the current EPA-approved
plan, two contingency measures were incorporated: an annual Inspection
and Maintenance Program versus the current biennial program and an
increase in the oxygenate content in fuels from 2.7% to 3%. The current
EPA-approved plan's trigger for these contingency measures is a
monitored CO violation. There have been no violations at any monitor
since the area was redesignated to attainment in 1996, thus these
contingency measures have never been triggered.
With this submission, the State is revising the contingency
measures and trigger for Bernalillo County. The contingency requirement
to implement an annual Inspection and Maintenance Program is being
eliminated. The contingency requirement to increase the oxygenate
concentration in fuels from 2.7% to 3%, by weight, will remain in
place. Instead of the contingency trigger being a monitored CO
violation, it will be triggered if an air quality monitor indicates
that the 85% CO NAAQS threshold has been exceeded. This oxygenated fuel
contingency measure will be implemented no later than November 1st
following activation of the contingency trigger. The State rule
(20.11.102 NMAC) has been updated to reflect this change to the
contingency trigger. We believe that the new stricter trigger and one
control measure are as protective as the previously-approved trigger
and two control measures. Therefore, the revised contingency measures
plan is being approved.
Finally, in the event that a violation of the CO NAAQS occurs, the
State has committed to development and submission of a full maintenance
plan within 12 months of EPA certification of the monitored violation.
This plan would supercede the Limited Maintenance Plan. [Note that the
State submittal reflects on p.15 an 18-month time frame for submittal
of a full maintenance plan following a violation of the NAAQS. However,
elsewhere in the State submittal (see p. 13), the 12-month commitment
is stated.] The EPA was informed by the State that the 18-month time
frame is a typographical error and therefore we are approving the
State's commitment to submit a full maintenance plan within 12 months
of EPA certification of the monitored violation.
Section 176(c) of the Act defines conformity as actions that do not
interfere with the SIP's purpose of eliminating or reducing the
severity and number of NAAQS violations. It also says that actions
cannot cause or contribute to any new violation or delay attainment or
any milestones. In most nonattainment and maintenance areas this is
shown by regional emissions analyses that demonstrate that estimated
emissions from the proposed project(s) are expected to be below a
defined emissions budget contained in the State's SIP, or by an interim
emissions test prior to availability of emissions budgets. However, in
areas with adequate or approved Limited Maintenance Plans, emissions
budgets
[[Page 19705]]
are treated as essentially not constraining for the length of the
maintenance plan as long as the area continues to meet the Limited
Maintenance Plan criteria. The EPA believes there is no reason to
expect that these areas will experience so much growth that a violation
of the CO NAAQS would result. Therefore, for areas meeting the Limited
Maintenance Plan criteria, all Federal actions that require conformity
determinations are considered to have satisfied the regional emissions
analysis requirement of the conformity regulations. Since these areas
are still maintenance areas; however, other aspects of the
transportation conformity regulations still apply. Specifically, such
areas must demonstrate that the metropolitan transportation plans and
transportation improvement programs are fiscally constrained (40 CFR
part 108) and that any Transportation Control Measures in the SIP are
being implemented according to the conformity rule (40 CFR 93.113).
Additionally, for most transportation projects in limited maintenance
areas, a CO ``hot spot'' analysis will still be required, incorporating
the latest planning assumptions and using the latest available EPA-
approved emissions model.
B. Control Measures in the Limited Maintenance Plan
The CO control program for Bernalillo County is comprised of both
Federal and local measures. The current maintenance plan for the area
includes several control strategies that will remain in place for the
duration of the second ten-year maintenance period of 2006-2016. The
Federal strategies expected are continued implementation of the Tier 2
motor vehicle emission standards along with the requirement for reduced
sulfur in gasoline, which became effective on February 10, 2000 (65 FR
6697). Additionally, EPA's newly approved non-road rule (69 FR 38957;
June 29, 2004) will regulate non-road diesel engines and diesel fuel.
This rule incorporates new emission standards, based on advanced
emission control devices, for non-road diesel engines and will result
in significant reductions in several criteria pollutants, including CO.
As newer vehicles gradually replace older ones in the fleet, these
control programs will result in lowered CO emissions in the
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County area and elsewhere.
Local control strategies remaining in place for the duration of the
second ten-year maintenance plan include an I&M Program, Oxygenated
Fuels Program, Woodburning Control Program, and the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration Program (PSD). The I&M program has been in
effect in Bernalillo County since 1989. The I&M SIP requires biennial
emissions testing of 1975 and newer vehicles with a 2-speed idle test.
For more information on the I&M SIP revision see section D of this
document and our TSD. Today, we are approving revisions to the I&M SIP
that, among other things, includes annual testing of 1975 through 1985
vehicles. The annual testing of older vehicles is designed to reduce CO
emissions from the on-road mobile sector by identifying high-emitting
vehicles and requiring repair. Failure to do so, as with all failing
vehicles, will result in vehicles not being issued a registration
renewal. The biennial testing of 1986 and newer vehicles will continue.
In addition, non-Bernalillo County vehicles used for commuting into
Bernalillo County for sixty or more days per year will now be required
to be tested. The combined annual/biennial program as described above
with the revisions discussed below in section C, will remain in place
for the duration of the second ten-year maintenance period (2006-2016).
The Oxygenated Fuels Program aims to reduce vehicle emissions by
providing for the use of oxygenated fuels. Various forms of this
program have been in place during the Winter months (November 15
through February) since 1988. The minimum oxygenate content of Winter
fuels in Bernalillo County is 2.7% by weight, and this requirement will
remain in effect for the duration of the second ten-year (2006-2016)
maintenance period.
Another local control strategy is the Woodburning Control Program,
which initially began during the winter of 1988. Because poor air
dispersion combined with high CO emissions from woodburning activities
can contribute to elevated CO levels, the Environmental Health
Department of the City of Albuquerque uses weather forecast information
to declare ``no burn'' periods which restrict woodburning activity in
Bernalillo County. This control program will remain in effect for the
duration of the second ten-year maintenance period.
The PSD program is a control program that has been approved into
the Bernalillo County SIP for local implementation. This program has
been in effect for CO since Bernalillo County was redesignated to
attainment in 1996. Under this program, new stationary sources of CO
are evaluated and are required to use the Best Available Control
Technology (BACT) to control emissions. This program will continue as a
control strategy during the second maintenance period of 2006-2016.
Based on above evaluation, outlined in sections A and B, this SIP
revision satisfies the requirements of the Act as amended in 1990 for
the second ten-year update to the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County CO
maintenance area.
C. Part 20.11.1 NMAC, General Provisions
The title 20, chapter 11, part 1, General Provisions, was submitted
to us for approval by the Governor of New Mexico, in a letter dated
September 7, 2004, on behalf of the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County,
Environmental Health Department. The proposed title 20, chapter 11,
part 1, General Provisions, contains three sections titled
``Resolution,'' ``Definitions,'' and ``Interpretation.'' The EPA
initially approved Regulation 1 (Resolution) of the Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County, New Mexico on 04/10/1980 (45 FR 24468). See 40 CFR
52.1620(c)(11). The EPA initially approved Regulation 2 (Definitions)
on 04/10/1980 (45 FR 24468). Further revisions to Regulation 2 were
later approved by EPA on 12/21/93 (54 FR 67330). See 40 CFR
52.1620(c)(53). The EPA initially approved Regulation 26
(Interpretation) on 02/23/1993 (58 FR 10972). See 40 CFR 52.1620
(c)(49). The proposed revisions to ``Resolution,'' ``Definitions,'' and
``Interpretation'' reflect the new format and renumbering of the NMAC.
The proposed revisions also reflect renaming of ``Regulation'' to
``Part.'' These changes are administrative in nature, and do not change
the text of the SIP-approved rules. We published our approval of the
recodification and renumbering of chapter 11 on December 30, 2004 (69
FR 78312). Therefore, these revisions are being approved today. The
proposed revisions may be found at: https://www.nmcpr.state.nm.us/nmac/
--title20/T20C011.htm.
D. Part 20.11.100 NMAC, Motor Vehicle Inspection-Decentralized
As a moderate nonattainment area for CO, the Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County area was required to implement a basic vehicle I&M program. The
latest version of the I&M SIP for this program was approved by EPA on
June 13, 1996 (61 FR 29970), along with the area redesignation to
attainment for CO. The program consists of a decentralized network of
``test only'' and ``test and repair'' stations. One of the submitted
revisions is that vehicles model years 1975-1985 are tested annually
instead of biennially with a 2-speed idle test. Vehicles model years
1986-1995 will
[[Page 19706]]
continue to be tested biennially with a 2-speed idle test. Vehicles
model years 1996 and newer will be tested biennially consistent with
the new On-board Diagnostic testing required by the Act. Revisions to
this SIP also include adding a gas cap pressure test, and exempting the
first four years for new vehicles from testing. Language clarification,
minor format changes, and some innovative measures are also included.
An example of an innovative measure is commuter vehicles which are more
than four years old and are driven into Bernalillo County for 60 or
more days per year are now subject to I&M testing. For further
information about the changes to the program, see the TSD.
The revisions made to the 20.11.100 NMAC, Motor Vehicle Inspection-
Decentralized for the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County area are consistent
with the requirements of the Act, the Federal Inspection and
Maintenance rules in 40 CFR 51 subpart S, do not weaken, but rather
strengthen the existing federally approved SIP. Therefore, these
revisions are being approved today.
E. Part 20.11.102 NMAC, Oxygenated Fuels
The initial EPA-approved revision to the SIP concerning oxygenated
fuels program for the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County utilizing ethanol
was approved on November 29, 1993 (58 FR 62535). Various forms of this
program have been in place during the Winter months (November 1 through
February) since 1988. The current SIP revision requires a minimum
oxygenate concentrate of Winter fuels of 2.7% by weight in the
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County (November 1 through February).
In a letter dated September 7, 2004, the Governor of New Mexico
submitted a request to revise the current carbon monoxide maintenance
plan for the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County area. This request, among
others as described above, was to incorporate the revised regulation
20.22.102 NMAC, Oxygenated Fuels, which only applies to the
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County area. The Albuquerque/Bernalillo County
Air Control Board adopted the amended regulation on July 14, 2004,
after a public comment period and public hearing conducted on June 9,
2004. The amended regulation became locally effective on September 1,
2004.
The SIP revision submitted provides minor grammatical and
typographical changes to the current EPA-approved Oxygenated Fuels
program. These changes are administrative in nature and are approvable.
Therefore, we are approving the revisions to the Oxygenated Fuels
Program into the SIP.
As noted and previously discussed in section A, the State also
submitted a request for the revision of the current contingency
measures plan in the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County maintenance plan
approved on June 13, 1996 (61 FR 29970). The oxygenated fuels'
contingency measure functions in 2 phases.
The first contingency measure phase, July 1, 1995 until June 13,
2006, or when EPA has approved this SIP revision regarding the second
half of the carbon monoxide maintenance plan for Bernalillo county,
increases the oxygenate concentration in gasoline from 2.7% to 3.0%, by
weight, for ethanol in the event the area exceeds the CO NAAQS. The
increase in oxygenate concentration will occur beginning November 1
immediately following the period of violation and will continue every
subsequent winter pollution season. The winter pollution season lasts
from November through February.
The second contingency measure phase, June 13, 2006 until June 13,
2016, or when EPA has approved this SIP revision regarding the second
half of the CO maintenance plan for Albuquerque/Bernalillo County,
whichever is sooner increases the oxygenate concentration in gasoline
from 2.7% to 3.0%, by weight, for ethanol in the event the area exceeds
85% of the CO NAAQS. The increase in oxygenate concentration will occur
beginning November 1 immediately following the period in which the area
exceeded 85% of the CO NAAQS and continues every subsequent winter
pollution season.
The EPA performed an analysis of the Albuquerque/ Bernalillo County
Air Control Board's submission and determined that it meets the
applicable requirements of the Act, and EPA's regulations, and is
consistent with our policies. The implementation of the oxygenated
fuels contingency measure triggered at 85% of the NAAQS for carbon
monoxide will provide for the reduction in the probability of the area
falling into nonattainment. Therefore, we are approving the revisions
to the Oxygenated Fuels rule. Our TSD prepared in conjunction with
today's action contains more information concerning this rulemaking.
III. Final Action
The EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to New Mexico's
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County SIP because the revisions are consistent
with the Act and EPA regulatory requirements. The EPA is publishing
this rule without prior proposal because the EPA views this as a non-
controversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. However,
in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, EPA
is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to
approve the SIP revision should adverse comments be filed. This rule
will be effective June 13, 2005 without further notice, unless EPA
receives relevant adverse comment by May 16, 2005.
If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public
is advised that this rule will be effective on June 13, 2005, and no
further action will be taken on the proposed rule.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175
[[Page 19707]]
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have
Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action
merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does
not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 13, 2005. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: March 31, 2005.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart GG--New Mexico
0
2. Section 52.1620 is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (c), in the second table entitled ``EPA Approved
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, NM Regulations,'' by revising the
entries for parts 1, 100, and 102.
0
b. In paragraph (e), in the second table entitled ``EPA Approved
Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the New
Mexico SIP'' by adding one new entry to the end of the table.
Sec. 52.1620 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA Approved Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, NM Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State approval/
State citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, Air Quality Control Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC) Title 20--Environment Protection, Chapter 11--Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County Air Quality Control Board
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part 1 (20.11.1 NMAC).......... General Provisions..... 09/07/04 04/14/05 [Insert ..................
FR page where
document begins].
* * * * * * *
Part 100 (20.11.100 NMAC)...... Motor Vehicle 09/07/04 04/14/05 [Insert ..................
Inspection--Decentrali FR page where
zed. document begins].
Part 102 (20.11.102 NMAC)...... Oxygenated Fuels....... 09/07/04 04/14/05 [Insert ..................
FR page where
document begins].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 19708]]
EPA Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the New Mexico SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable State
Name of SIP provision geographic or submittal date/ EPA approval date Explanation
nonattainment area effective date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Second 10-year maintenance plan Bernalillo County.. 09/07/04 04/14/05 [Insert FR ...................
(limited maintenance plan) for page where
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County. document begins].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
3. Section 52.1627 is amended by designating the existing text as
paragraph (a) and by adding paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1627 Control strategy and regulations: Carbon monoxide.
* * * * *
(b) Approval--The Albuquerque/Bernalillo County carbon monoxide
limited maintenance plan revision dated September 7, 2004, meets the
requirements of section 172 of the Clean Air Act, and is therefore
approved.
[FR Doc. 05-7336 Filed 4-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P