Ochoco National Forest, Lookout Mountain Ranger District; Oregon; Maury Mountains Allotment Management Plan EIS, 19414-19415 [05-7395]
Download as PDF
19414
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 13, 2005 / Notices
land is steep, and is bounded on the
south by the Blackwater River. The only
reasonable access to the AWP property
is via the railroad grade through the
Canyon, a portion of which AWP is a
half owner. The Federal government
owns the other half of the grade, which
is administered by the Forest Service as
part of the Monongahela National
Forest.
Goal XIV of the Monongahela
National Forest Land and Resource
Management Plan (Forest Plan) states
‘‘Permit use of National Forest land by
others, under special use or lease
authorities, that is compatible with
National Forest goals and objectives and
will contribute to the improved quality
of life for local residents.’’
This authorization is needed to move
towards goal XIV of the Forest Plan.
of this road by motorized equipment has
the potential to damage to these historic
properties. In addition, the railroad
grade may be eligible for inclusion in
the National Historic Register.
Proposed Action
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact
statement will be prepared for comment.
The comment period on the draft
environmental impact statement will be
45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45
day comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
The Forest Service is proposing to
authorize an easement for the railroad
grade in Blackwater Canyon to
Alleghany Wood Products for the
management of their timbered property.
This authorization would include the
need for additional improvement of
sections of the road to allow motorized
vehicle use.
Responsible Official
Clyde Thompson, Forest Supervisor;
Monongahela National Forest; 200
Sycamore Street; Elkins, West Virginia
26241.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is how to
provide access for Alleghany Wood
Products to their property adjacent to
National Forest System lands. While the
No Action alternative will be considered
in the analysis, selection of this
alternative is precluded by the
requirements of the ANILCA.
Scoping Process
Scoping will be initiated by the
posting of this notice in the Federal
Register. Scoping letters will be mailed
to interested parties requesting input
from members of the public. Upon
completion of the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS), comments will
be solicited through a Notice of
Availability in the Federal Register and
a mailing of the DEIS to those members
of the public who have responded to our
scoping efforts and other interested
parties.
Preliminary Issues
There are several historic properties
along the railroad grade which are
eligible for inclusion in the National
Register of Historic Places. Repeated use
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:37 Apr 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. In November, 2002 a
scoping letter was sent to members of
the public regarding this project. At that
point in time, it was believed that an
Environmental Assessment may be
appropriate. As a result of scoping and
further analysis, it has been determined
that an Environmental Impact Statement
is more appropriate due to the presence
of, and potential impacts to, heritage
resources.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CRF 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: April 4, 2005.
Michele H. Jones,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05–7363 Filed 4–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Ochoco National Forest, Lookout
Mountain Ranger District; Oregon;
Maury Mountains Allotment
Management Plan EIS
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Ochoco National Forest is
preparing an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to analyze the effects of
changing grazing management in six
allotments in the Maury Mountains.
These six allotments are: Double Cabin,
East Maury, West Maury, Klootchman,
Sherwood, and Shotgun. The proposed
action will alter livestock management
to improve stream shade, bank stability,
and livestock distribution. These actions
are needed to promote the recovery of
riparian vegetation which will provide
stream shade and contribute to stream
bank stability.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by May
1, 2005. The draft environmental impact
statement is expected to be completed
and available for public comment in
August 2005. The final environmental
impact statement is expected to be
completed in December 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Art Currier, District Ranger, Lookout
Mountain District, Ochoco National
Forest, 3160 NE Third Street, Prineville,
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
13APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 13, 2005 / Notices
Oregon 97754. Alternatively, electronic
comments can be sent to commentspacificnorthwest-ochoco@fs.fed.us.
Electronic comments must be submitted
as part of the actual e-mail message, or
as an attachment in plain text (.txt),
Microsoft Word (.doc), rich text format
(.rtf), or portable document format
(.pdf).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Keown, Project Leader, at the
address listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of this proposal is to
reauthorize livestock consistent with
Forest Plan standards and guidelines.
There is a need to change livestock
management to move towards desired
conditions for stream shade and bank
stability. Based on surveys many of the
streams do not meet the desired
condition for shade or bank stability.
Livestock grazing is one of the factors
that contribute to low levels of shade
and unstable stream banks.
Proposed Action
The Lookout Mountain Ranger
District is proposing to reauthorize
livestock grazing on the Double Cabin,
East Maury, Klootchman, Sherwood,
and Shotgun allotments. The 2-pasture
West Maury allotment would be
eliminated; the Gibson pasture would be
added to the Sherwood allotment and
the Hamer pasture would be added to
the Klootchman allotment. The
reauthorized grazing permits will
contain terms and conditions to better
distribute livestock and allow recovery
of riparian vegetation. The grazing
systems would change for most of these
allotments. The number of animal unit
months (AUMs) would be reduced on
the Double Cabin, Klootchman, and
Shotgun allotments. The season of use
would be adjusted and cattle grazing
would not occur before May 1 or be
allowed after August 15 each year. This
early on/early off schedule would
reduce livestock grazing in riparian
areas. New structural range
improvements including fencing and
spring developments would be
authorized. Several existing water
troughs would be relocated outside of
riparian areas. These activities are
designed to improve livestock
distribution.
Possible Alternatives
At this time, the Forest Service
intends to analyze a minimum of three
alternatives. The no action alternative
will analyze the effects of no grazing.
The proposed action will analyze the
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:37 Apr 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
effects of continued livestock grazing
with a modified season of use, change
in grazing systems, new structural range
improvements, and relocating troughs
outside riparian areas. The third
alternative being considered at this time
would analyze the effects of continued
livestock grazing under the same terms
and conditions as the existing term
grazing permits.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official is Art
Currier, District Ranger, Lookout
Mountain Ranger District, at the address
listed above.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The District Ranger will decide
whether to reauthorize livestock grazing
on the Double Cabin, East Maury,
Klootchman, Sherwood, and Shotgun
allotments. If livestock grazing is
authorized, the District Ranger will
decide what terms and conditions are
needed to move the existing condition
of resources affected by livestock
grazing toward the desired condition
described in the Ochoco National Forest
Land and Resource Management Plan.
Scoping Process
Scoping for this proposal began on
March 14, 2005, when letters were
mailed to interested and potentially
affected persons and organizations.
Scoping letters were also sent to state
and local government agencies, as well
as Tribal Governments.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent continues the
scoping process which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. The Forest Service is
seeking information and comments from
other agencies, organizations, Native
Americans, and individuals who may be
interested in or affected by the Proposed
Action. Comments will be used to
determine key issues and develop
alternatives to the proposed action.
Comments would be most helpful if
they are specific to the proposed
changes; provide new information
specific to the proposed action; identify
a different way to meet the purpose and
need (e.g., a new alternative); or identify
possible mitigation measures.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact
statement will be prepared for comment.
The draft EIS will be filed with the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and available for public review by
August 2005. The comment period on
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19415
the draft EIS will begin when the EPA
publishes the notice in the Federal
Register. The comment period will last
for 45 days.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the
comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest in identifying and
considering issues and concerns on the
proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should
be as specific as possible. It is also
helpful if comments refer to specific
pages or chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statements or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
Dated: April 1, 2005.
Arthur J. Currier,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 05–7395 Filed 4–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
13APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19414-19415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7395]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Ochoco National Forest, Lookout Mountain Ranger District; Oregon;
Maury Mountains Allotment Management Plan EIS
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Ochoco National Forest is preparing an environmental
impact statement (EIS) to analyze the effects of changing grazing
management in six allotments in the Maury Mountains. These six
allotments are: Double Cabin, East Maury, West Maury, Klootchman,
Sherwood, and Shotgun. The proposed action will alter livestock
management to improve stream shade, bank stability, and livestock
distribution. These actions are needed to promote the recovery of
riparian vegetation which will provide stream shade and contribute to
stream bank stability.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by May 1, 2005. The draft environmental impact statement is expected to
be completed and available for public comment in August 2005. The final
environmental impact statement is expected to be completed in December
2005.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Art Currier, District Ranger,
Lookout Mountain District, Ochoco National Forest, 3160 NE Third
Street, Prineville,
[[Page 19415]]
Oregon 97754. Alternatively, electronic comments can be sent to
comments-pacificnorthwest-ochoco@fs.fed.us. Electronic comments must be
submitted as part of the actual e-mail message, or as an attachment in
plain text (.txt), Microsoft Word (.doc), rich text format (.rtf), or
portable document format (.pdf).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Keown, Project Leader, at the
address listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of this proposal is to reauthorize livestock consistent
with Forest Plan standards and guidelines. There is a need to change
livestock management to move towards desired conditions for stream
shade and bank stability. Based on surveys many of the streams do not
meet the desired condition for shade or bank stability. Livestock
grazing is one of the factors that contribute to low levels of shade
and unstable stream banks.
Proposed Action
The Lookout Mountain Ranger District is proposing to reauthorize
livestock grazing on the Double Cabin, East Maury, Klootchman,
Sherwood, and Shotgun allotments. The 2-pasture West Maury allotment
would be eliminated; the Gibson pasture would be added to the Sherwood
allotment and the Hamer pasture would be added to the Klootchman
allotment. The reauthorized grazing permits will contain terms and
conditions to better distribute livestock and allow recovery of
riparian vegetation. The grazing systems would change for most of these
allotments. The number of animal unit months (AUMs) would be reduced on
the Double Cabin, Klootchman, and Shotgun allotments. The season of use
would be adjusted and cattle grazing would not occur before May 1 or be
allowed after August 15 each year. This early on/early off schedule
would reduce livestock grazing in riparian areas. New structural range
improvements including fencing and spring developments would be
authorized. Several existing water troughs would be relocated outside
of riparian areas. These activities are designed to improve livestock
distribution.
Possible Alternatives
At this time, the Forest Service intends to analyze a minimum of
three alternatives. The no action alternative will analyze the effects
of no grazing. The proposed action will analyze the effects of
continued livestock grazing with a modified season of use, change in
grazing systems, new structural range improvements, and relocating
troughs outside riparian areas. The third alternative being considered
at this time would analyze the effects of continued livestock grazing
under the same terms and conditions as the existing term grazing
permits.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official is Art Currier, District Ranger, Lookout
Mountain Ranger District, at the address listed above.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The District Ranger will decide whether to reauthorize livestock
grazing on the Double Cabin, East Maury, Klootchman, Sherwood, and
Shotgun allotments. If livestock grazing is authorized, the District
Ranger will decide what terms and conditions are needed to move the
existing condition of resources affected by livestock grazing toward
the desired condition described in the Ochoco National Forest Land and
Resource Management Plan.
Scoping Process
Scoping for this proposal began on March 14, 2005, when letters
were mailed to interested and potentially affected persons and
organizations. Scoping letters were also sent to state and local
government agencies, as well as Tribal Governments.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent continues the scoping process which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. The Forest
Service is seeking information and comments from other agencies,
organizations, Native Americans, and individuals who may be interested
in or affected by the Proposed Action. Comments will be used to
determine key issues and develop alternatives to the proposed action.
Comments would be most helpful if they are specific to the proposed
changes; provide new information specific to the proposed action;
identify a different way to meet the purpose and need (e.g., a new
alternative); or identify possible mitigation measures.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact statement will be prepared for
comment. The draft EIS will be filed with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and available for public review by August 2005. The
comment period on the draft EIS will begin when the EPA publishes the
notice in the Federal Register. The comment period will last for 45
days.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a
time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the
final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest in identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful
if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statements or the merits of the alternatives formulated and
discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council
on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in
addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
Dated: April 1, 2005.
Arthur J. Currier,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 05-7395 Filed 4-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M