National Environmental Policy Act; Mars Exploration Program, 19102-19103 [05-7322]
Download as PDF
19102
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 12, 2005 / Notices
complete the questionnaire; (b) there
will be 250 follow-up evaluations
administered each year; and (c)
searchers are asked to complete this
questionnaire once per search. Cost
burden estimates assume: (a) There are
no capital or start-up costs for
respondents, and (b) respondents’ time
is valued at $39/hr.
Program Support and System Design
Services
The U.S. Institute provides leadership
and assistance to agencies/organizations
developing collaborative problem
solving and dispute resolution programs
and systems. Program development and
dispute system design services include
assistance with planning, developing,
designing, implementing, evaluating,
and/or refining federal environmental
conflict resolution programs, systems
for handling administrative disputes, or
approaches for managing environmental
decision making (e.g., with processes
under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA)).
(11) Program Support and System
Design Services—Questionnaire for
Agency Representatives and Key
Participants (annual survey for length of
project);
New collection request; Abstract:
Agency representatives and key project
participants who request and receive
U.S. Institute program support and
system design services will be asked to
complete a voluntary questionnaire
containing seven questions. The
questionnaire will require fill-in-the
blank and open-ended responses.
Affected Entities: Entities potentially
affected by this action are individuals
who benefit from program support and
system design services from the U.S.
Institute. Burden Statement: It is
estimated that the annual national
public burden and associated costs will
be approximately six hours and $234,
respectively. These values were
calculated assuming that on average: (a)
Agency representatives or key project
participants require six minutes to
complete the questionnaire; (b) there
will be 60 responses each year; and (c)
on average three agency representatives/
key participants are involved in each
initiative. Cost burden estimates
assume: (a) There are no capital or startup costs for respondents, and (b)
respondents’ time is valued at $39/hr.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 5601–5609)
Dated: April 6, 2005.
Christopher L. Helms,
Executive Director, Morris K. Udall
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 05–7278 Filed 4–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–FN–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:48 Apr 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice 05–070]
National Environmental Policy Act;
Mars Exploration Program
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of final
programmatic environmental impact
statement (FPEIS) for implementation of
the Mars Exploration Program (MEP).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for Implementing
the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40
CFR parts 1500–1508), and NASA
policy and procedures (14 CFR part
1216 subpart 1216.3), NASA has
prepared and issued an FPEIS for the
MEP. The FPEIS addresses the potential
environmental impacts associated with
continuing the preparations for and
implementing the program. The MEP
would be a science-driven, technologyenabled effort to characterize and
understand Mars using an exploration
strategy which focuses on evidence of
the presence of water. The Proposed
Action, that is NASA’s Preferred
Alternative, addresses the preparation
for and implementation of a coordinated
series of robotic orbital, surface, and
atmospheric missions to gather
scientific data on Mars and its
environments through 2020. Continued
planning for missions to return Martian
samples to Earth would be included.
Some MEP missions could use
radioisotope power systems (RPSs) for
electricity, radioisotope heater units
(RHUs) for thermal control, and small
quantities of radioisotopes in science
instruments for experiments and
instrument calibration. Environmental
impacts associated with specific
missions would be addressed in
subsequent environmental
documentation, as appropriate.
Missions launched from the United
States would likely originate from either
Cape Canaveral Air Force Station
(CCAFS), Florida, or Vandenberg Air
Force Base (VAFB), California.
DATES: NASA will take no final action
on the proposed MEP on or before May
12, 2005, or 30 days from the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
the EPA notice of availability of the
MEP FPEIS, whichever is later.
ADDRESSES: The FPEIS may be reviewed
at the following locations:
(a) NASA Headquarters, Library,
Room 1J20, 300 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20546–0001;
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(b) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Visitors
Lobby, Building 249, 4800 Oak Grove
Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109.
Hard copies of the FPEIS may be
reviewed at other NASA Centers (see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION below).
Limited hard copies of the FEIS are
available for distribution by contacting
Mark R. Dahl at the address, telephone
number, or electronic mail address
indicated below. The FPEIS is also
available in Acrobat format at https://
spacescience.nasa.gov/admin/pubs/
mepeis/index.htm. NASA’s Record of
Decision (ROD) will also be placed on
that Web site when it is issued. Anyone
who desires a hard copy of NASA’s
ROD when it is issued also should
contact Mr. Dahl.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark R. Dahl, Mission and Systems
Management Division, Science Mission
Directorate, Mail Suite 3C66, NASA
Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546–
0001; telephone (202) 358–4800;
electronic mail mep.nepa@hq.nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: With the
MEP, NASA would establish a series of
objectives to address the open scientific
questions associated with the
exploration of Mars. These objectives
have been organized by the program as
follows:
• Determine if life exists or has ever
existed on Mars;
• Understand the current state and
evolution of the atmosphere, surface,
and interior of Mars; and
• Develop an understanding of Mars
in support of possible future human
exploration.
The purpose of the action addressed
in the FPEIS is to further the scientific
goals of the MEP by continuing the
exploration and characterization of the
planet. On the basis of the knowledge
gained from prior and ongoing missions,
it appears that Mars, like Earth, has
experienced dynamic interactions
among its atmosphere, surface, and
interior that are, at least in part, related
to water. Following the pathways and
cycles of water has emerged as a strategy
that possibly may lead to a preserved
record of biological processes, as well as
the character of ancient environments
on Mars. In addition to understanding
the history of Mars, investigations
undertaken in the MEP may shed light
on current environments that could
support existing biological processes.
The Proposed Action (Alternative 1)
would consist of a long-term program
that, as a goal, sends at least one
spacecraft to Mars during each launch
opportunity extending through the first
two decades of the twenty-first century.
Efficient launch opportunities to Mars
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 12, 2005 / Notices
occur approximately every 26 months.
MEP missions likely would be launched
on expendable launch vehicles (e.g.,
Delta or Atlas class) from either CCAFS,
Florida, or VAFB, California. The MEP
could include international missions in
which NASA proposes to be a
participant and that are to be launched
from a foreign site.
Under the Proposed Action, the MEP
would consist of a series of robotic
orbital, surface, and atmospheric
missions to Mars. Some spacecraft could
use RPSs for continuous electrical
power, RHUs for thermal control, and
small quantities of radioisotopes in
science instruments for experiments and
instrument calibration.
Missions beyond 2011 could include
the first mission to return Martian
samples to Earth. As new information
and techniques become available during
the course of the program, the timing,
focus, and objectives of future MEP
missions could be redirected.
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
evaluated in the FPEIS include the
following:
• Under Alternative 2, NASA would
continue to explore Mars through 2020,
but on a less frequent, less
comprehensive, mission-by-mission
basis. These missions may include
international partners. Any mission
proposed to continue the exploration of
Mars would be developed and launched
within the broader context of all other
missions proposed for exploring other
parts of the solar system, rather than in
the context of a Mars-focused program.
Robotic orbital, surface, and
atmospheric missions could be used to
explore Mars and could include sample
return missions. Landed spacecraft
could use RPSs for power generation or
RHUs for thermal control of
temperature-sensitive components in
the spacecraft. Some spacecraft may
carry small quantities of radioisotopes
in science instruments for experiments
and for instrument calibration.
• Under the No Action Alternative,
NASA would discontinue planning for
and launching robotic missions to Mars
through 2020. Currently operating
NASA spacecraft at or en route to Mars
would continue their missions to
completion. New science investigations
of Mars would only be made remotely
from Earth-based assets (i.e., ground- or
space-based observatories, or from
spacecraft developed and launched to
Mars by non-U.S. space agencies).
The environmental impacts of the
Proposed Action and Alternatives are
discussed in the FPEIS from a
programmatic perspective. Because the
FPEIS has been prepared during the
planning stages for the MEP, specific
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:48 Apr 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
proposed projects and missions within
the MEP are only addressed in terms of
a broad, conceptual framework. Each
project or mission within the MEP that
would propose use of RPSs or RHUs
would be the subject of additional
environmental documentation. While
detailed analyses and test data for each
spacecraft-launch vehicle combination
are not yet available, there is sufficient
information from previous programs
and existing NEPA documentation to
assess the potential environmental
impacts.
A major component of the MEP is
continued planning for one or more
missions that would return samples
from Mars. At the time of publication of
the FPEIS, preliminary concepts for a
sample return mission are being studied
and would continue to be refined and
evaluated. A sample return mission
would be the subject of separate
environmental documentation, as would
the location, design and operational
requirements for a returned-sample
receiving facility. The non-radiological
environmental impacts associated with
normal spacecraft launches from both
CCAFS and VAFB have been addressed
in previous U.S. Air Force and NASA
environmental documentation. Rocket
launches are discrete events that cause
short-term impacts on local air quality.
However, because launches are
relatively infrequent events, and winds
rapidly disperse and dilute the launch
emissions to background
concentrations, long-term effects from
exhaust emissions would not be
anticipated. If solid rocket motors are
used, surface waters in the immediate
area of the exhaust cloud might
temporarily acidify from deposition of
hydrogen chloride. Launching a mission
during each opportunity to Mars
(approximately every 26 months) under
the Proposed Action or less frequently
under Alternative 2 would result in
negligible release of ozone-depleting
chemicals with no anticipated long-term
cumulative impacts.
One or more of the missions to Mars
could propose the use of radioisotopes
under the Proposed Action and
Alternative 2. Small quantities of
radioisotopes may be used for
instrument calibration or to enable
science experiments, and RHUs or RPSs
containing varying amounts of
plutonium dioxide may be used to
supply heat and electric power,
respectively. Under both alternatives
NASA will determine the appropriate
level of NEPA documentation required
for any mission proposing use of
radiological material. Many of the
parameters that determine the risks for
a specific mission are expected to be
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19103
similar to those associated with
previous missions (e.g., Galileo, Ulysses,
Cassini, and the Spirit and Opportunity
rovers). Mission-specific factors that
affect the estimated risk include the
amount and type of radioactive material
used in a mission, the protective
features of the devices containing the
radioactive material, the probability of
an accident which can damage the
radioactive material, and the accident
environments (e.g., propellant fires,
debris fragments, and blast
overpressure). The risks associated with
a Mars exploration mission carrying
radioactive material are, therefore,
expected to be similar to those
estimated for earlier missions. The
population and individual risks
associated with prior missions that have
made use of radioactive material have
all been shown to be relatively small.
The FPEIS may be examined at the
following NASA locations by contacting
the pertinent Freedom of Information
Act Office:
(a) NASA, Ames Research Center,
Moffett Field, CA 94035 (650–604–
1181).
(b) NASA, Dryden Flight Research
Center, P.O. Box 273, Edwards, CA
93523 (661–258–3449).
(c) NASA, Glenn Research Center at
Lewis Field, 21000 Brookpark Road,
Cleveland, OH 44135 (216–433–2755).
(d) NASA, Goddard Space Flight
Center, Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD
20771 (301–286–6255).
(e) NASA, Johnson Space Center,
Houston, TX 77058 (281–483–8612).
(f) NASA, Kennedy Space Center, FL
32899 (321–867–9280).
(g) NASA, Langley Research Center,
Hampton, VA 23681 (757–864-2497).
(h) NASA, Marshall Space Flight
Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 (256–544–
2030).
(i) NASA, Stennis Space Center, MS
39529 (228–688–2164).
NASA published a Notice of
Availability (NOA) of the Draft PEIS
(DPEIS) for the MEP in the Federal
Register on April 22, 2004 (69 FR
21865). In addition, NASA made the
DPEIS available in electronic format on
its Web site. The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency published its NOA in
the Federal Register on April 23, 2004
(69 FR 22025). NASA received ten
written comment submissions during
the comment period ending June 7,
2004. The comments are addressed in
the FPEIS.
Jeffrey E. Sutton,
Assistant Administrator for Infrastructure
and Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–7322 Filed 4–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19102-19103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7322]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice 05-070]
National Environmental Policy Act; Mars Exploration Program
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of final programmatic environmental
impact statement (FPEIS) for implementation of the Mars Exploration
Program (MEP).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA
(40 CFR parts 1500-1508), and NASA policy and procedures (14 CFR part
1216 subpart 1216.3), NASA has prepared and issued an FPEIS for the
MEP. The FPEIS addresses the potential environmental impacts associated
with continuing the preparations for and implementing the program. The
MEP would be a science-driven, technology-enabled effort to
characterize and understand Mars using an exploration strategy which
focuses on evidence of the presence of water. The Proposed Action, that
is NASA's Preferred Alternative, addresses the preparation for and
implementation of a coordinated series of robotic orbital, surface, and
atmospheric missions to gather scientific data on Mars and its
environments through 2020. Continued planning for missions to return
Martian samples to Earth would be included. Some MEP missions could use
radioisotope power systems (RPSs) for electricity, radioisotope heater
units (RHUs) for thermal control, and small quantities of radioisotopes
in science instruments for experiments and instrument calibration.
Environmental impacts associated with specific missions would be
addressed in subsequent environmental documentation, as appropriate.
Missions launched from the United States would likely originate from
either Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Florida, or Vandenberg
Air Force Base (VAFB), California.
DATES: NASA will take no final action on the proposed MEP on or before
May 12, 2005, or 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal
Register of the EPA notice of availability of the MEP FPEIS, whichever
is later.
ADDRESSES: The FPEIS may be reviewed at the following locations:
(a) NASA Headquarters, Library, Room 1J20, 300 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20546-0001;
(b) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Visitors Lobby, Building 249, 4800
Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109.
Hard copies of the FPEIS may be reviewed at other NASA Centers (see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION below).
Limited hard copies of the FEIS are available for distribution by
contacting Mark R. Dahl at the address, telephone number, or electronic
mail address indicated below. The FPEIS is also available in
Acrobat[reg] format at https://spacescience.nasa.gov/admin/pubs/mepeis/
index.htm. NASA's Record of Decision (ROD) will also be placed on that
Web site when it is issued. Anyone who desires a hard copy of NASA's
ROD when it is issued also should contact Mr. Dahl.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark R. Dahl, Mission and Systems
Management Division, Science Mission Directorate, Mail Suite 3C66, NASA
Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546-0001; telephone (202) 358-4800;
electronic mail mep.nepa@hq.nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: With the MEP, NASA would establish a series
of objectives to address the open scientific questions associated with
the exploration of Mars. These objectives have been organized by the
program as follows:
Determine if life exists or has ever existed on Mars;
Understand the current state and evolution of the
atmosphere, surface, and interior of Mars; and
Develop an understanding of Mars in support of possible
future human exploration.
The purpose of the action addressed in the FPEIS is to further the
scientific goals of the MEP by continuing the exploration and
characterization of the planet. On the basis of the knowledge gained
from prior and ongoing missions, it appears that Mars, like Earth, has
experienced dynamic interactions among its atmosphere, surface, and
interior that are, at least in part, related to water. Following the
pathways and cycles of water has emerged as a strategy that possibly
may lead to a preserved record of biological processes, as well as the
character of ancient environments on Mars. In addition to understanding
the history of Mars, investigations undertaken in the MEP may shed
light on current environments that could support existing biological
processes.
The Proposed Action (Alternative 1) would consist of a long-term
program that, as a goal, sends at least one spacecraft to Mars during
each launch opportunity extending through the first two decades of the
twenty-first century. Efficient launch opportunities to Mars
[[Page 19103]]
occur approximately every 26 months. MEP missions likely would be
launched on expendable launch vehicles (e.g., Delta or Atlas class)
from either CCAFS, Florida, or VAFB, California. The MEP could include
international missions in which NASA proposes to be a participant and
that are to be launched from a foreign site.
Under the Proposed Action, the MEP would consist of a series of
robotic orbital, surface, and atmospheric missions to Mars. Some
spacecraft could use RPSs for continuous electrical power, RHUs for
thermal control, and small quantities of radioisotopes in science
instruments for experiments and instrument calibration.
Missions beyond 2011 could include the first mission to return
Martian samples to Earth. As new information and techniques become
available during the course of the program, the timing, focus, and
objectives of future MEP missions could be redirected.
Alternatives to the Proposed Action evaluated in the FPEIS include
the following:
Under Alternative 2, NASA would continue to explore Mars
through 2020, but on a less frequent, less comprehensive, mission-by-
mission basis. These missions may include international partners. Any
mission proposed to continue the exploration of Mars would be developed
and launched within the broader context of all other missions proposed
for exploring other parts of the solar system, rather than in the
context of a Mars-focused program. Robotic orbital, surface, and
atmospheric missions could be used to explore Mars and could include
sample return missions. Landed spacecraft could use RPSs for power
generation or RHUs for thermal control of temperature-sensitive
components in the spacecraft. Some spacecraft may carry small
quantities of radioisotopes in science instruments for experiments and
for instrument calibration.
Under the No Action Alternative, NASA would discontinue
planning for and launching robotic missions to Mars through 2020.
Currently operating NASA spacecraft at or en route to Mars would
continue their missions to completion. New science investigations of
Mars would only be made remotely from Earth-based assets (i.e., ground-
or space-based observatories, or from spacecraft developed and launched
to Mars by non-U.S. space agencies).
The environmental impacts of the Proposed Action and Alternatives
are discussed in the FPEIS from a programmatic perspective. Because the
FPEIS has been prepared during the planning stages for the MEP,
specific proposed projects and missions within the MEP are only
addressed in terms of a broad, conceptual framework. Each project or
mission within the MEP that would propose use of RPSs or RHUs would be
the subject of additional environmental documentation. While detailed
analyses and test data for each spacecraft-launch vehicle combination
are not yet available, there is sufficient information from previous
programs and existing NEPA documentation to assess the potential
environmental impacts.
A major component of the MEP is continued planning for one or more
missions that would return samples from Mars. At the time of
publication of the FPEIS, preliminary concepts for a sample return
mission are being studied and would continue to be refined and
evaluated. A sample return mission would be the subject of separate
environmental documentation, as would the location, design and
operational requirements for a returned-sample receiving facility. The
non-radiological environmental impacts associated with normal
spacecraft launches from both CCAFS and VAFB have been addressed in
previous U.S. Air Force and NASA environmental documentation. Rocket
launches are discrete events that cause short-term impacts on local air
quality. However, because launches are relatively infrequent events,
and winds rapidly disperse and dilute the launch emissions to
background concentrations, long-term effects from exhaust emissions
would not be anticipated. If solid rocket motors are used, surface
waters in the immediate area of the exhaust cloud might temporarily
acidify from deposition of hydrogen chloride. Launching a mission
during each opportunity to Mars (approximately every 26 months) under
the Proposed Action or less frequently under Alternative 2 would result
in negligible release of ozone-depleting chemicals with no anticipated
long-term cumulative impacts.
One or more of the missions to Mars could propose the use of
radioisotopes under the Proposed Action and Alternative 2. Small
quantities of radioisotopes may be used for instrument calibration or
to enable science experiments, and RHUs or RPSs containing varying
amounts of plutonium dioxide may be used to supply heat and electric
power, respectively. Under both alternatives NASA will determine the
appropriate level of NEPA documentation required for any mission
proposing use of radiological material. Many of the parameters that
determine the risks for a specific mission are expected to be similar
to those associated with previous missions (e.g., Galileo, Ulysses,
Cassini, and the Spirit and Opportunity rovers). Mission-specific
factors that affect the estimated risk include the amount and type of
radioactive material used in a mission, the protective features of the
devices containing the radioactive material, the probability of an
accident which can damage the radioactive material, and the accident
environments (e.g., propellant fires, debris fragments, and blast
overpressure). The risks associated with a Mars exploration mission
carrying radioactive material are, therefore, expected to be similar to
those estimated for earlier missions. The population and individual
risks associated with prior missions that have made use of radioactive
material have all been shown to be relatively small.
The FPEIS may be examined at the following NASA locations by
contacting the pertinent Freedom of Information Act Office:
(a) NASA, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035 (650-604-
1181).
(b) NASA, Dryden Flight Research Center, P.O. Box 273, Edwards, CA
93523 (661-258-3449).
(c) NASA, Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field, 21000 Brookpark
Road, Cleveland, OH 44135 (216-433-2755).
(d) NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt,
MD 20771 (301-286-6255).
(e) NASA, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058 (281-483-8612).
(f) NASA, Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899 (321-867-9280).
(g) NASA, Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681 (757-864-
2497).
(h) NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 (256-
544-2030).
(i) NASA, Stennis Space Center, MS 39529 (228-688-2164).
NASA published a Notice of Availability (NOA) of the Draft PEIS
(DPEIS) for the MEP in the Federal Register on April 22, 2004 (69 FR
21865). In addition, NASA made the DPEIS available in electronic format
on its Web site. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency published its
NOA in the Federal Register on April 23, 2004 (69 FR 22025). NASA
received ten written comment submissions during the comment period
ending June 7, 2004. The comments are addressed in the FPEIS.
Jeffrey E. Sutton,
Assistant Administrator for Infrastructure and Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-7322 Filed 4-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P