General Services Acquisition Regulation; Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy Program, 19045-19051 [05-7270]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
You may submit comments,
identified by DFARS Case 2003–D025,
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Defense Acquisition Regulations
Web Site: https://emissary.acq.osd.mil/
dar/dfars.nsf/pubcomm. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2003–D025 in the subject
line of the message.
• Fax: (703) 602–0350.
• Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations Council, Attn: Ms. Debbie
Tronic, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DAR),
IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3062.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council,
Crystal Square 4, Suite 200A, 241 18th
Street, Arlington, VA 22202–3402.
All comments received will be posted
to https://emissary.acq.osd.mil/dar/
dfars.nsf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Debbie Tronic, (703) 602–0289.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
A. Background
DFARS Transformation is a major
DoD initiative to dramatically change
the purpose and content of the DFARS.
The objective is to improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of the
acquisition process, while allowing the
acquisition workforce the flexibility to
innovate. The transformed DFARS will
contain only requirements of law, DoDwide policies, delegations of FAR
authorities, deviations from FAR
requirements, and policies/procedures
that have a significant effect beyond the
internal operating procedures of DoD or
a significant cost or administrative
impact on contractors or offerors.
Additional information on the DFARS
Transformation initiative is available at
https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dfars/
transf.htm.
This proposed rule is a result of the
DFARS Transformation initiative. The
proposed changes—
• Revise DFARS 244.301 to clarify
Government responsibilities for
conducting reviews of contractor
purchasing systems.
• Delete text at DFARS 244.304
containing examples of weaknesses in a
contractor’s purchasing system that may
indicate the need for a review. This text
will be relocated to the new DFARS
companion resource, Procedures,
Guidance, and Information (PGI),
available at https://www.acq.osd.mil/
dpap/dars/pgi.
• Update the clause at DFARS
252.244–7000 to reflect the current title
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:24 Apr 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
of the clause at FAR 52.244–6,
Subcontracts for Commercial Items.
This rule was not subject to Office of
Management and Budget review under
Executive Order 12866, dated
September 30, 1993.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this rule to have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the rule makes no significant
change to DoD contracting policy.
Therefore, DoD has not performed an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
DoD invites comments from small
businesses and other interested parties.
DoD also will consider comments from
small entities concerning the affected
DFARS subparts in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 610. Such comments should be
submitted separately and should cite
DFARS Case 2003-D025.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the rule does not
impose any information collection
requirements that require the approval
of the Office of Management and Budget
under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 244 and
252
Government procurement.
Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, DoD proposes to amend 48
CFR Parts 244 and 252 as follows:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
Parts 244 and 252 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR
Chapter 1.
PART 244—SUBCONTRACTING
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
2. Section 244.301 is revised to read
as follows:
244.301
Objective.
The administrative contracting officer
(ACO) is solely responsible for initiating
reviews of the contractor’s purchasing
systems, but other organizations may
request that the ACO initiate such
reviews.
3. Section 244.304 is revised to read
as follows:
244.304
Surveillance.
(b) The ACO, or the purchasing
system analyst (PSA) with the
concurrence of the ACO, may initiate a
special review of specific weaknesses in
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19045
the contractor’s purchasing system. See
PGI 244.304(b) for examples of
weaknesses.
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
252.244–7000
[Amended]
4. Section 252.244–7000 is amended
as follows:
a. By revising the clause date to read
‘‘(XXX 2005)’’; and
b. In the introductory text of the
clause by removing the phrase ‘‘and
Commercial Components’’.
[FR Doc. 05–7091 Filed 4–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 538 and 552
[GSAR 2005–G501]
RIN 3090–AI06
General Services Acquisition
Regulation; Federal Agency Retail
Pharmacy Program
Office of the Chief Acquisition
Officer, General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The General Services
Administration (GSA) is proposing to
amend the General Services Acquisition
Regulation (GSAR) to add a new subpart
and clause required by the Department
of Veterans Affairs (VA), consistent with
Congressional intent under Section 603
of the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992
(VHCA) that certain Federal agencies
(i.e., VA, Department of Defense (DoD),
Public Health Service (including the
Indian Health Service), and the Coast
Guard) have access to Federal pricing
for pharmaceuticals purchased for their
beneficiaries.
GSA is responsible for the schedules
program and rules related to its
operation. Under GSA’s delegation of
authority, the VA procures medical
supplies under the VA Federal Supply
Schedule program. VA and DoD seek
this amendment. This new subpart adds
a clause unique to the virtual depot
system established by a Federal Agency
Retail Pharmacy Program utilizing
contracted retail pharmacies as part of a
centralized pharmaceutical commodity
management program. At this time, only
DoD has a program in place, and the
rule would facilitate DoD’s access to
Federal pricing offered on Federal
Supply Schedule (FSS) pharmaceutical
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
19046
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
contracts for covered drugs purchased
by DoD and dispensed to TRICARE
beneficiaries through retail pharmacies
in the TRICARE network.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
comments in writing on or before June
13, 2005 to be considered in the
formulation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by GSAR case 2005–G501 by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Web Site: https://
www.acqnet.gov/GSAM/
gsamproposed.html. Click on the GSAR
case number to submit comments.
• E-mail: gsarcase.2005–
G501@gsa.gov. Include GSAR case
2005–G501 in the subject line of the
message.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(VIR), 1800 F Street, NW, Room 4035,
ATTN: Laurieann Duarte, Washington,
DC 20405.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite GSAR case 2005–G501 in
all correspondence related to this case.
All comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.acqnet.gov/far/ProposedRules/
proposed.htm, including any personal
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT The
Regulatory Secretariat (VIR), Room
4035, GS Building, Washington, DC
20405, (202) 208–7312, for information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules. For clarification of content,
contact Ms. Kimberly Marshall at (202)
219–0986, or by e-mail at
kimberly.marshall@gsa.gov. Please cite
GSAR case 2005–G501.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Introduction
Under the General Services
Administration (GSA) Schedules (also
referred to as Multiple Award Schedules
and Federal Supply Schedules)
Program, 41 U.S.C. 259(b) and 40 U.S.C.
501, GSA establishes long-term
Governmentwide contracts with
commercial firms to provide access to
over four million commercial services
and products that can be ordered
directly from GSA Schedule contractors
or through the GSA Advantage! TM
online shopping and ordering system.
GSA Schedules offer customers direct
delivery of millions of state-of-the-art,
high-quality commercial services and
products at volume discount pricing.
All customers, even those in remote
locations, can order the latest
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:24 Apr 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
technology and quality services and
products, conveniently, and at mostfavored customer prices. GSA Schedules
also offer the potential benefits of
shorter lead-times, lower administrative
costs, and reduced inventories. When
using GSA Schedules, ordering
activities have the opportunity to meet
small business goals, while promoting
compliance with various environmental
and socioeconomic laws and
regulations.
The General Services Administration
has delegated the responsibility for
certain Federal Supply Schedules to the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
This includes Federal Supply
Classification (FSC) Group 65, which
includes pharmaceuticals and drugs.
Federal agencies and certain other
organizations are eligible to purchase
pharmaceuticals and drugs from VA
supply schedules.
B. Background
1. The Federal Agency Retail
Pharmacy Program Supply Schedule
clause. These changes will allow VA to
revise its schedule contracts to
accommodate the ordering needs of
Federal agencies, i.e. DOD, VA, the
Public Health Service (including the
Indian Health Service), and the Coast
Guard, pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8126,
through virtual depot systems. These
depot systems will use contracted retail
pharmacies as part of the centralized
pharmaceutical commodity
management program. DoD’s TRICARE
Retail Pharmacy Program is the first
such virtual depot system and will be
the prototype for future systems. This
rule will allow Federal agencies to take
advantage of FSS pricing and receive a
refund, where appropriate, from drug
manufacturers for sales to those
agencies through the retail pharmacy
network virtual depot system, for their
beneficiaries.
In general, Federal pricing of
pharmaceuticals refers to discounts
(Federal Ceiling Prices (FCPs)) available
from manufacturers under Section 603
of the Veterans Health Care Act (VHCA)
of 1992 (38 U.S.C. 8126), and Federal
Supply Schedule (FSS) prices under the
VA Federal Supply Schedule program.
The VHCA requires drug manufacturers
to enter into a Master Agreement with
VA under which a Pharmaceutical
Pricing Agreement is executed
establishing a discount for covered
drugs obtained by VA, DoD, the Public
Health Service (including the Indian
Health Service), and the Coast Guard
purchased by these Federal agencies
under depot contracting systems or
listed on the FSS. Specifically, this rule
adds a new subpart to the GSAR on
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy
Program (subpart 538.XX) and a new
clause, Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy
Program Supply Schedule (GSAR
552.238–XX) for those Federal Agency
Retail Pharmacy Programs determined
by the VA Secretary to qualify as a
‘‘depot’’ contracting system as set forth
in 38 U.S.C. 8126.
This rulemaking assists the ongoing
reengineering of the TRICARE Pharmacy
Benefits Program (TPBP), consistent
with the Congressional actions and
DoD’s prior rulemaking described
below. This rulemaking is consistent
with the authority provided by 38
U.S.C. 8126 to acquire drugs at the
statutorily provided discount through
use of a depot contracting system.
Pursuant to the Federal Agency Retail
Pharmacy Program clause, the drugs for
beneficiaries will be deemed to be
ordered by the Federal agencies through
the FSS contract solely for the purposes
of pricing, delivery, and scope of
coverage, but does not confer rights for
any other purpose. The Federal agencies
will obtain refunds on covered drugs
purchased through the retail pharmacy
network by those agencies and
dispensed to beneficiaries. The drug
manufacturer will base the refund on
the difference between a benchmark
price, consisting of either the
manufacturer’s actual sales price to the
wholesaler or retail pharmacy chain
when known and auditable or nonFAMP (non-Federal average
manufacturer price) and the Federal
Supply Schedule price (the Federal
Ceiling Price or FSS negotiated price,
whichever is lower).
The Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy
Program Supply Schedule clause in this
rule refers to a VA clause, ‘‘Industrial
Funding Fee and Sales Reporting (JUL
2003)(Variation’’). This clause is
available at the following website: http:/
/www.va.gov/oamm/nac/fsss/.
2. The TRICARE Pharmacy Benefits
Program (TPBP) of the Department of
Defense. This rule is required by DoD in
order to reengineer its TRICARE
Pharmacy Benefits Program. DoD is
directed by statute (title 10, United
States Code, chapter 55) to provide an
improved and uniform health care
benefits program in order to create and
maintain high morale in the uniformed
services. TRICARE is DoD’s
comprehensive health care program for
over 9.3 million beneficiaries—active
duty Service members and their
families, as well as retirees and their
families and survivors—and includes a
robust pharmacy benefit that gives
beneficiaries the option of obtaining
drugs from military treatment facilities,
by mail order, or through retail
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
pharmacies. The TRICARE pharmacy
website is at https://www.tricare.osd.mil/
pharmacy/. The TRICARE Pharmacy
Benefits Program uses the VA supply
schedules, among other vehicles.
Section 703 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for FY 1999 (Public
Law 105–261) required the Secretary of
Defense to plan a ‘‘system-wide redesign
of the military and contractor retail and
mail-order pharmacy system of the
Department of Defense by incorporating
’best business practices’ of the private
sector.’’ In addition, section 701 of the
FY 2000 National Defense Authorization
Act (Public Law 106–65) enacted 10
U.S.C. 1074g, which directed the
Secretary to ‘‘establish an effective,
efficient, integrated pharmacy benefits
program.’’
DoD has reengineered the TPBP to
meet these Congressional requirements.
The redesign of the TPBP was the
subject of public rulemaking (see 69 FR
17035, April 1, 2004) and is codified at
32 CFR Section 199.21.
One key goal of the reengineering
effort is to extend Federal pricing of
pharmaceuticals to prescriptions filled
for TRICARE beneficiaries by retail
pharmacies in the TRICARE network.
DOD has taken advantage of the
statutory pricing authority with respect
to drugs purchased and dispensed
through the TRICARE mail order
pharmacy program and military
hospitals. DoD is now in a position to
extend Federal pricing to the TRICARE
retail pharmacy network. As a result of
reengineering, DoD is able to link DoD’s
drug purchases from network
pharmacies to the manufacturer of the
purchased drug, including those
manufacturers with FSS contracts.
In particular, the redesigned TPBP
leverages new technology to create a
centralized commodity management
system as required under the VHCA for
a depot contracting system. As
previously stated, the VHCA requires
drug manufacturers to enter into a
Master Agreement with VA under
which a Pharmaceutical Pricing
Agreement is executed establishing a
discount for covered drugs purchased
by VA, DoD, the Public Health Service
(including the Indian Health Service),
and the Coast Guard under depot
contracting systems or listed on the FSS.
All drug manufacturers that signed a
Master Agreement and Pharmaceutical
Pricing Agreement with VA were
advised by letter signed by the Acting
Executive Director, VA National
Acquisition Center, dated October 14,
2004 (which letter is hereby
incorporated by reference), that the VA
Secretary had determined that DoD’s
TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Program was
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:24 Apr 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
a centralized pharmaceutical
commodity management system that
met the definition of ‘‘depot’’
contracting system as set forth in 38
U.S.C. 8126. While that letter authorized
DoD to obtain Federal Ceiling Prices for
drugs purchased through the TRICARE
retail pharmacy network after
September 30, 2004, this rule will
extend FSS pricing to such drugs.
Pursuant to the terms of a contract
awarded by DoD, a commercial
pharmacy benefits manager (PBM) will
provide a retail pharmacy network for
the DoD TRICARE Management
Activity. The PBM will issue payment
with Government funds for
prescriptions dispensed by retail
network pharmacies to TRICARE
beneficiaries. DoD will provide
manufacturers with itemized data on
covered drugs purchased through
TRICARE retail network pharmacies in
order to obtain appropriate refunds on
covered drugs delivered to TRICARE
beneficiaries.
DoD will use the reporting and audit
capabilities of the Pharmacy Data
Transaction Service (PDTS) to verify
beneficiary eligibility, authorize
prescription payments, and validate the
refund owed to the Government.
The PBM contractor has no role in
DoD’s process for obtaining refunds
based on FSS prices (whether Federal
Ceiling Prices or negotiated lower FSS
prices) already established by VA. Nor
is DoD’s payment to the PBM contractor
related, either directly or indirectly, to
Federal pricing of pharmaceuticals
dispensed to TRICARE beneficiaries by
network pharmacies.
Congress has anticipated the
extension of Federal pricing to the
redesigned TPBP. In the Defense
Appropriations Act for FY 2005 (Public
Law 108–287), Congress decreased the
funding in the Defense Health Program
account to reflect savings generated
from the application of Federal pricing
to the TRICARE pharmacy program. In
addition, Senate Report No. 108–260,
accompanying the proposed National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2005, S. 2400, reiterates an
expectation for savings and
recommends further decreases to
TRICARE program funding. The report
(page 313) states:
The budget request reflected $172.0
million in savings related to the use of
federal pricing for retail pharmaceuticals in
fiscal year 2005. The committee understands
that the funding in the defense health
program request did not reflect anticipated
savings for retail pharmaceuticals beginning
in June 2004, when federal pricing
authorized by the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs under title 38, United States Code, is
applied in a new retail pharmacy program.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19047
Accordingly, the committee recommends a
decrease of $44 million in the defense health
program account.
It should be noted that the effective
date in the aforementioned committee
report has been extended to October 1,
2004.
3. The Department of Veterans
Affairs. The General Services
Administration is promulgating this rule
also to assist efforts by the Department
of Veterans Affairs to provide medical
care and associated services to veterans
of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and
Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), as
well as to provide more efficient access
to newly written prescriptions for
veterans currently receiving medical
care at locations where VA pharmacy
services are not immediately available.
Such venues primarily include
Community Based Outpatient Clinics
(CBOCs). As is the current practice,
refills would be handled at VA’s
consolidated mail outpatient
pharmacies (CMOPs).
As some portion of OIF and OEF
veterans will be returning from combat
areas to their homes in locations where
VA pharmacy services are not
immediately available, VA is currently
contemplating how to meet the needs of
these returning soldiers for timely, highquality and cost-effective prescription
services. Based upon the July 29, 2004,
VHA report, ‘‘Analysis of VA Health
Care Utilization Among Veterans of
Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation
Enduring Freedom’’, approximately
27,571 (16 percent) of the 168,528
separated OIF veterans and 5,113 (11
percent) of the 45,880 separated OEF
veterans identified by VA based on data
provided by DoD, have sought VA
health care since they were deployed.
VA believes that contractual
arrangements whereby VA pays for new
prescriptions at Federal prices in
community settings will allow VA to
meet its obligations to its existing
patients, as well as newly enrolled OIF
and OEF beneficiaries, in a costeffective and timely manner.
In the future, it is likely that VA will
make use of this rule to provide
prescription services to beneficiaries
authorized to receive services under one
or more of the following programs: VA’s
CHAMPVA, VA Fee Program, Spina
Bifada Health Care Program, Children of
Women Vietnam Veterans Program, or
other contracted medical care programs.
While VA does not currently have
contractual arrangements in place to
immediately take advantage of this rule,
it is actively engaged in the preparatory
work to solicit for such contracts.
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
19048
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
CHAMPVA
CHAMPVA is a health care benefits
program for—
• Dependents of veterans who have
been rated by the VA as having a total
and permanent disability;
• Survivors of veterans who died from
VA-rated service-connected conditions,
or, who at the time of death, were rated
permanently and totally disabled from a
VA-rated service-connected condition;
and
• Survivors of persons who died in the
line of duty and not due to misconduct
and not otherwise entitled to benefits
under DoD’s TRICARE program.
Under CHAPVA, VA shares the cost
of covered health care services and
supplies with eligible beneficiaries. As
is the current practice, patients would
continue to have a choice to refill their
medications through the VA CMOP
under the Made-by-Mail program. For
fiscal year 2004 (FY 04), there were
234,000 beneficiaries enrolled and
149,400 unique users for the CHAMPVA
program.
VA Fee Program
The VA Fee program provides
authorization for certain veterans to
receive community-based medical care,
hospital care, home care, nursing home
care, and services when VA facilities are
not available. Fee care is governed by 38
U.S.C. 1703, 38 U.S.C. 1725, and 38
U.S.C. 1728. Approved services are
generally paid on a fee-for-service or
contract schedule. Authorization may be
for brief or long-term episodes of care.
Spina Bifida Health Care Program
Spina Bifida Health Care Program
provides benefits to Vietnam veterans’
birth children diagnosed with spina
bifida and who are in receipt of a VA
regional office award for spina bifida
benefits. Under this program, VA
assumes financial responsibility for
medical service and supplies related to
the treatment of spina bifida, including
complications and associated
conditions, excluding spina bifida
occulta. Spina bifida beneficiaries are
not responsible for a cost share. In FY
04, there were 1,164 beneficiaries
enrolled and 689 unique users for the
Spina Bifida Health Care program.
Children of Women Vietnam Veterans
Program
Children of Women Vietnam Veterans
(CWVV) program provides benefits for
women Vietnam veterans’ birth children
diagnosed with one or more covered
birth defects as determined by the
Denver VA regional office. Under this
program, VA assumes financial
responsibility for medical services and
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:24 Apr 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
supplies related to the treatment of the
covered birth defects, including
complications and associated
conditions. CWVV beneficiaries are not
responsible for a cost share. In FY 04,
there were eight beneficiaries enrolled
and no unique users for the CWVV
program.
4. The U.S. Public Health Service
(including the Indian Health Service).
Although the U.S. Public Health
Service/Indian Health Service do not
have current plans to establish a Federal
Agency Retail Pharmacy program, if and
when the VA Secretary determines that
such a program initiated by these
agencies qualifies as a ‘‘depot’’
contracting system as set forth in 38
U.S.C. 8126, this rule would apply to
that program.
C. Executive Order 12866
We have examined the impacts of the
proposed rule under Executive Order
12866. Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). We
believe that this proposed rule is
consistent with the regulatory
philosophy and principles identified in
the Executive order. This proposed rule
is considered a significant regulatory
action under the Executive order.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before issuing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $115
million, using the implicit GDP deflator
for 2003, the most recent year for which
final data exist. This proposed rule does
not contain such a mandate.
E. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 804) requires that regulations that
have been identified as being major
must be submitted to Congress before
taking effect. If implemented as
proposed, this rule is not a major rule
under the Congressional Review Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
F. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612), requires agencies to
analyze regulatory options that would
minimize any significant impact of a
rule on small entities. This rulemaking
assists VA’s efforts to revise its schedule
to accommodate the ordering needs of
Federal agencies, i.e., DoD, VA, the
Public Health Service (including the
Indian Health Service), and the Coast
Guard, pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8126,
through virtual depot systems. At this
time, only DoD has a program in place,
TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Program, that
is designed to work through a virtual
depot system. The Coast Guard utilizes
the TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Program
and, thus, is included in the DoD
TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
discussion below.
The changes may have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. However, this appears to be very
unlikely. The Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis is as follows:
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis,
GSAR Case 2005–G501, Federal Agency
Retail Pharmacy Program
This Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
has been prepared in accordance with
Section 603, Title 5, of the United States
Code.
1. Description of the reasons why action by
the agency is being considered. This rule
amends the General Services Acquisition
Regulation (GSAR) to add a new subpart and
clause to complement ongoing efforts by the
Department of Defense (DoD) to reengineer
its TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Benefits
Program, and the Department of Veterans
Affairs’ (VA) plans to create a similar
program. This is consistent with
Congressional intent under Section 603 of the
Veterans Health Care Act of 1992 (VHCA)
that certain Federal agencies (i.e., VA, DoD,
Public Health Service (including the Indian
Health Service), and the Coast Guard) have
access to Federal pricing for pharmaceuticals
purchased for their beneficiaries.
2. Succinct statement of the objectives of,
and legal basis for, the rule. Section 603 of
the VHCA requires that certain Federal
agencies (i.e., VA, DoD, Public Health Service
(including the Indian Health Service), and
the Coast Guard) have access to Federal
pricing for pharmaceuticals purchased for
their beneficiaries. This rule would facilitate
DoD’s access to Federal pricing offered on
Federal Supply Schedule (FSS)
pharmaceutical contracts for covered drugs
purchased by DoD and dispensed to
TRICARE beneficiaries through retail
pharmacies in the TRICARE network. It
would also facilitate access to the same
Federal pricing for retail network pharmacy
programs instituted by the other agencies
named in section 603. GSA has overall
responsibility for the schedules program and
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
rules related to its operation and have
empowered VA, under a GSA delegation of
authority, to procure medical supplies under
the VA Federal Supply Schedule program.
VA and DoD both seek this amendment to the
GSAR.
3. Description of and, where feasible,
estimate of the number of small entities to
which the rule will apply. The changes may
have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities within
the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., but this appears to be
very unlikely because of the research
conducted (queries of the Central Contractor
Registration system database, as well as
information provided directly by DoD and
VA officials).
It is estimated that the rule will apply to
approximately two dozen small businesses as
a result of these changes. It should be noted
that more than half of these businesses have
annual gross sales exceeding $20 million,
thus comparing very favorably with their
large business counterparts. Further, the high
gross sales figures of the small businesses in
the pharmaceutical industry indicates the
reporting of sales and the payment of refunds
to the Federal agencies named in section 603
will have little significant impact on them.
Since subcontractors are not required to be
registered in CCR, the total number of small
businesses positively impacted may be
greater than this; but not significantly so,
since subcontracting is not common in the
production of pharmaceuticals.
4. Description of projected reporting,
recordkeeping, and other compliance
requirements of the rule, including an
estimate of the classes of small entities which
will be subject to the requirement and the
type of professional skills necessary for
preparation of the report or record. The rule
will impose a new three-step reporting/
recordkeeping requirement on all entities
that hold VA Federal Supply Schedule
contracts (for FSC Group 65, which includes
covered pharmaceuticals and drugs),
including small entities. The first step is the
reporting of VA schedule sales of covered
drugs (under section 603) under the
TRICARE and other Federal agency retail
pharmacy programs. The second step is the
calculation and the payment of the refunds
owed to DoD and other named Federal
agencies with similar programs. The third
step is the calculation and payment of the
industrial funding fee owed to VA. This
paperwork justification covers the
calculation of the refunds owed to DoD. The
types of professional skills necessary for the
reporting/recordkeeping and processing of
payment is very minimal—predominately
spreadsheet and database operational skills
which are both essentially clerical. The
recordkeeping and processing of payment
transactions can both be accomplished
electronically, so the effort to be expended on
this is minimal.
5. Identification, to the extent practicable,
of all relevant Federal rules which may
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the rule.
This rule is to assist DoD in the final phase
of implementing the following: Section 703
of the National Defense Authorization Act for
FY 1999 (Public Law 105–261) which
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:24 Apr 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
required the Secretary of Defense to plan a
system-wide redesign of the military and
contractor retail and mail-order pharmacy
system of the Department; and Section 701 of
the FY 2000 National Defense Authorization
Act (Public Law 106–65) enacted 10 U.S.C.
1074g, which directed the Secretary to
establish an effective, efficient, integrated
pharmacy benefits program. This rule also
facilitates access to the same Federal pricing
for retail network pharmacy programs
instituted by other agencies under section
603. There are no other known Federal rules
which may duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this rule.
6. Description of any significant
alternatives to the rule which accomplish the
stated objectives of applicable statutes and
which minimize any significant economic
impact of the rule on small entities. There are
no known alternatives to accomplish the
stated objectives to assist DoD’s reengineered
TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Benefits Program
and VA’s planned retail pharmacy program,
which would further lessen any significant
economic impact of the rule on small
entities. As stated previously, the economic
impact is deemed to be minimal.
The Regulatory Secretariat has
submitted a copy of the IRFA to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration. Interested
parties may obtain a copy from the
Regulatory Secretariat. The Councils
will consider comments from small
entities concerning the affected GSAR
Parts 538 and 552 in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must
submit such comments separately and
should cite 5 U.S.C 601, et seq. (GSAR
case 2005–G501), in correspondence.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking assists VA’s efforts to
revise its schedule to accommodate the
ordering needs of Federal agencies, i.e.,
DoD, VA, the Public Health Service
(including the Indian Health Service),
and the Coast Guard, pursuant to 38
U.S.C. 8126, through virtual depot
systems. At this time only DoD has a
program in place, TRICARE Retail
Pharmacy Program that is designed to
work through a virtual depot system.
The Coast Guard utilizes the TRICARE
Retail Pharmacy Program; and, thus, is
included in the DoD TRICARE Retail
Pharmacy Paperwork Burden discussion
below.
The discussion of information
collection activities below applies to the
DoD TRICARE program. It is expected
that other eligible agencies will request
additional collections of information
specific to their respective programs. At
such time eligible agencies will request
OMB numbers for prospective
collections and seek public comment.
Summary of Collection of
Information: DoD is revising the
information collection requirements
under current OMB control number
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19049
0720–0032. Specifically, under the
revised collection of information,
respondents (drug manufacturers) will
base refund calculation reporting
requirements on both the Federal
Ceiling Price and the Federal Supply
Schedule Price, whichever is lower.
Prior to this rulemaking, drug
manufacturers’ reporting requirements
addressed only the Federal Ceiling
Price.
Proposed Use of Information: DoD
will use the reporting and audit
capabilities of the Pharmacy Data
Transaction Service (PDTS) to validate
refunds owed to the Government.
Annual Reporting Burden: Public
reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 8
hours per response, including the time
for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information.
The annual reporting burden is
estimated as follows:
Respondents: There are
approximately 300 drug manufacturers
responding to this collection.
Responses per respondent: 4
Total annual responses: 1,200
Preparation hours per response: 8
Total response burden hours: 9,600
H. Request for Comments Regarding
Paperwork Burden
Submit comments, including
suggestions for reducing this burden,
not later than June 13, 2005 to: DoD
Health Desk Officer, OMB, Room 10102,
NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, and a
copy to the General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(VIR), 1800 F Street, NW, Room 4035,
Washington, DC 20405, and a copy to
Colonel James Young, or Major Travis
Watson, TRICARE Management
Activity, 5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite 810,
Falls Church, VA 22041–3206 (703 681–
0039).
Public comments are particularly
invited on: whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the DoD,
and will have practical utility; whether
our estimate of the public burden of this
collection of information is accurate,
and based on valid assumptions and
methodology; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways in
which we can minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, through the use of
appropriate technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
19050
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Requester may obtain a copy of the
justification from the Colonel James
Young or Major Travis Watson,
TRICARE Management Activity, 5111
Leesburg Pike, Suite 810, Falls Church,
VA 22041–3206 (703 681–0039). Please
cite OMB Control Number 0720–0032,
GSAR case 2005–G501, Federal Agency
Retail Pharmacy Program, in all
correspondence.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 538 and
552
Government procurement.
Dated: April 6, 2005.
David A. Drabkin,
Senior Procurement Executive, Office of the
Chief Acquisition Officer, General Services
Administration.
Therefore, GSA proposes amending
48 CFR parts 538 and 552 as set forth
below:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 538 and 552 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c).
PART 538—FEDERAL SUPPLY
SCHEDULE CONTRACTING
2. Add Subpart 538.XX, consisting of
sections 538.XX01 and 538.XX02, to
read as follows:
Sec.
538.XX01
538.XX02
Scope.
Contract clause.
Subpart 538–XX—Federal Agency
Retail Pharmacy Program
538.XX01
Scope.
This subpart prescribes a clause that
applies to a retail pharmacy program of
any of the Federal agencies covered by
Section 603 of the Veterans Health Care
Act (VHCA) of 1992, Public Law 102–
585 (38 U.S.C. 8126). As described in 38
U.S.C. 8126(b), the Federal agencies
include the Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA), Department of Defense
(DoD), Public Health Service (including
the Indian Health Service), and the
Coast Guard.
538.XX02
Contract clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the
clause at 552.238–XX, Federal Agency
Retail Pharmacy Program Supply
Schedule, in solicitation and schedule
contracts for Schedule 65, Part I, Section
B, to apply only to orders for a Retail
Pharmacy Program of the Department of
Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense,
Public Health Service (including the
Indian Health Service), and the Coast
Guard.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:24 Apr 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PART 552—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
3. Add section 552.238–XX to read as
follows:
552.238–XX Federal Agency Retail
Pharmacy Program Supply Schedule.
As prescribed in 538.XX02, insert the
following clause:
FEDERAL AGENCY RETAIL PHARMACY
PROGRAM SUPPLY SCHEDULE (DATE)
(a) This clause applies only to a Federal
Agency Retail Pharmacy Program
administered by one of the Federal agencies
described in Section 603 of the Veterans
Health Care Act (VHCA) of 1992 (38 U.S.C.
8126). When this clause applies, the FAR
clauses 52.216–18, 52.216–19, GSAR clause
552.232–74, and FSS clauses I-FSS–103, and
F-FSS–202–G do not apply.
(b) The Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy
Program procedures, including pricing
procedures, and those in this clause, are
consistent with 38 U.S.C. 8126. The Federal
agency enters into contracts with a
commercial pharmacy benefits manager to
provide a retail pharmacy network. The
pharmacy benefits manager will issue
payment with Government funds to the retail
pharmacy for prescriptions dispensed to the
Federal agency beneficiaries. The Federal
agency will provide to FSS contractors
itemized data on covered drugs procured
through the agency’s retail network
pharmacies, in order to obtain appropriate
refunds on covered drugs delivered to the
Federal agency’s beneficiaries and subject to
Federal pricing. The drugs will be deemed to
have been ordered by the Federal agency
through the FSS contract, for the purposes of
establishing price, delivery, and scope of
coverage, but does not confer rights for any
other purpose. The Federal agency will
obtain refunds on covered drugs from FSS
contractors based on the difference between
a benchmark price, consisting of either the
manufacturer’s actual sales price to the
wholesaler or retail pharmacy chain when
known and auditable or non-FAMP (nonFederal average manufacturer price), and the
Federal Supply Schedule price (the Federal
Ceiling Price or FSS negotiated price,
whichever is lower).
(c) Ordering. (1) All Federal agency
network retail pharmacy prescription orders
for covered drugs are subject to the terms and
conditions of this contract. In the event of
conflict between a prescription order and this
contract, the contract shall control.
(2) A Federal agency’s instruction to its
contracted or subcontracted retail pharmacy
to fill a prescription for a health care
beneficiary of the agency, under its virtual
depot system for centralized pharmaceutical
management, shall be deemed to be an order
placed against this contract.
(d) Invoice payments. The time and
method of payments to the Contractor for
FSS items deemed (for the purposes of
establishing price, delivery, and scope of
coverage) to have been ordered by a Federal
agency through its contracted or
subcontracted retail pharmacies will be
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
determined according to commercial
agreements between the FSS Contractor and
such pharmacies or their authorized
Pharmaceutical Prime Vendors.
(e) Scope of contract worldwide. (1) This
solicitation is issued to establish contracts
which may be used as sources of supplies or
services described herein for domestic and/
or overseas delivery.
(2) Definition. Domestic delivery is delivery
within the 48 contiguous states, Alaska,
Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Washington, DC, and
U.S. territories. Domestic delivery also
includes a port or consolidation point, within
the aforementioned areas, for orders received
from overseas activities.
(3) Contractor will provide domestic
delivery only for Federal agency retail
pharmacy orders.
(4) The Contractor is obligated to accept
orders received from activities within the
Executive branch of the Federal Government.
Federal beneficiary prescriptions for FSSlisted covered drugs that are filled through a
Federal agency’s directly contracted or
indirectly subcontracted retail pharmacy,
under the agency’s virtual depot system for
centralized pharmaceutical commodity
management, will be deemed to constitute
Executive branch orders, solely for the
purposes of establishing pricing, delivery,
and scope of coverage, but does not confer
rights for any other purpose.
(f) Delivery prices. Prices offered must
cover delivery of FSS covered drugs to all
Federal agency contracted or subcontracted
retail pharmacies (or to their authorized
PPVs) for use in filling prescriptions for such
agencies’ beneficiaries, as part of the
agencies’ virtual depot system for centralized
pharmaceutical commodity management.
(g)Electronic Commerce. A Federal Agency
Retail Pharmacy Program will require a
Contractor to receive and process refund
requests submitted according to the following
procedures:
(1) On the 15th of the month following the
end of each calendar year quarter, the Federal
Agency Pharmacy Benefits Office (PBO) will
generate and submit to each pharmaceutical
manufacturer a Utilization Flat File Layout
Report for their products procured during the
prior quarter, based on National Council for
Prescription Drug Programs (NCPDP)
Standards Version 03 Release 02 (or most
current version).
(i) The 15th was selected to enable
reversals to clear within the 10-day hold
period.
(ii) NCPDP represents industry standards.
(iii) The Federal agency, VA, and industry
(as a whole) will establish an interface
control document for the transmission and
file layout, to include the population of
optional and conditional data elements for
standardization for all of industry.
(iv) Separate reports will be generated for
purchases paid from the Department of
Defense’s (DoD’s) Accrual Fund and DHP
account.
(2) Within the Utilization Flat File Detail
Record (UD), the product code identifier will
be used by the Contractor to sum (grand
metric quantity) the total metric decimal
quantity of individual records of each
product purchased by the Government
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
through individual Federal agency retail
network pharmacies. The grand metric
quantity for each product will then be
rounded down to the nearest package size
based on the product code identifier to yield
the total number of units procured by the
Federal agency.
(i) The National Drug Code (NDC) number
will be used to populate the product code
identifier. The NDC should correlate to the
actual product dispensed by the pharmacy,
based on commercial best practice and data
integrity requirements demanded by health
plans and other insurers.
(ii) The Federal agency’s Office of Program
Integrity will be notified of any pharmacies
identified (by Government, industry, or other
means) as submitting fraudulent NDCs.
(iii) NDCs assigned by product repackagers
will only be included in the reports when the
repackager NDC can be correlated to the NDC
of the originating product.
(3) Contractor Refund and Reporting
Schedule. (i) The Contractor shall complete
refund calculations not later than 60 days
following the date of the quarterly UD
Report.
(ii) The Contractor shall make refund
payments so that such payments are received
by DoD not later than 70 days following the
date of the quarterly UD Report. At the time
of refund payment, the Contractor shall also
send to the Federal Agency’s Pharmacy
Benefits Office (PBO) a Reconciliation Report
corresponding to the quarterly UD Report
and resulting refund payment.
(h) Resolution of Refund Data
Disagreements. (1) If the Contractor disagrees
with the Federal agency data in the quarterly
refund request under paragraph (g) of this
clause, the Contractor shall provide prompt
written notice to the PBO. Such notice shall
be received by the PBO no later than 10
business days after the Contractor’s discovery
of the alleged error, but in no event no later
than one year after the date of the quarterly
report containing the alleged erroneous data.
The notice shall include specific
identification of the alleged error(s) and the
specific reason(s) the Contractor believes the
data to be in error, along with all available
documentation that supports the Contractor’s
allegation(s).
(2) The Federal agency’s PBO will initiate
a prompt review of the data following receipt
of the notice and documentation provided by
the Contractor. The parties agree to use their
best good faith efforts to resolve any
disagreement within 60 days of the PBO’s
receipt of the Contractor’s written notice.
During this period, the Contractor shall
proceed diligently with performance of this
contract and will exhaust administrative
remedies under this clause prior to filing a
dispute under the Disputes clause
incorporated into this contract. Performance
includes remittance of any refund due the
Federal agency based upon the data provided
by the PBO with which the Contractor
disagrees. If the written notice of
disagreement is resolved in favor of the
Contractor, the Federal agency shall
reimburse the Contractor the amount of
remitted refund attributed to the error and
simple interest on the reimbursed amount at
the rate determined in accordance with the
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:58 Apr 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
Contract Disputes Act of 1978, as amended
(41 U.S.C. 601–603), from the date of receipt
of the Contractor’s remittance of the refund
in disagreement.
(3) If the Federal agency and the Contractor
cannot resolve the disagreement within 60
days following receipt of the Contractor’s
written notice (and any time extensions
mutually agreed to by the parties), the
Contractor shall have exhausted
administrative remedies under this clause
and may proceed with disputes remedies
available under the Disputes clause and the
Contract Disputes Act of 1978, as amended.
(i) Industrial Funding Fee and Sales
Reporting. The Contractor shall report all
contract sales covered by this clause and pay
the Industrial Funding Fee (IFF) included
therein, as required by VA’s variation of
clause 552.238–74 of the contract, ‘‘Industrial
Funding Fee and Sales Reporting (JUL 2003)
(Variation’’). All sales of covered drugs made
through retail pharmacies under this clause
are deemed to be reportable when the
Contractor receives the quarterly Utilization
Flat File Layout Report(s) (or its functional
substitute), applies the appropriate FSS
contract price (including IFF) to the rounded
total number of units of each covered product
purchased by the submitting agency (as
shown on the Flat File Report), and computes
the total dollar sales of each product. These
sales are counted as FSS sales on the date the
computations are finished (for example, the
results of computations finished on March 10
are reported 60 days after the end of the first
calendar quarter, on May 30). The grand total
of all retail pharmacy sales (at the
appropriate FSS contract prices) under this
clause computed during a calendar quarter
shall be included in the Contractor’s
quarterly sales report to VA. That
information and the resultant IFF shall be
provided to VA according to the timelines
and procedures established in 552.238–74.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 05–7270 Filed 4–11–04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–61–S
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 546 and 552
[GSAR ANPR 2005–N01]
General Services Administration
Acquisition Regulation; Waiver of
Consequential Damages and ‘‘Post
Award’’ Audit Provisions (Correction)
Office of the Chief Acquisition
Officer, General Services
Administration (GSA)
ACTION: Correction to advance notice of
proposed rulemaking and notice of
public meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The General Services
Administration (GSA) is requesting
comments from both Government and
industry on whether the General
Services Administration Acquisition
Regulation (GSAR) should be revised to
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19051
include a waiver of consequential
damages for contracts awarded for
commercial items under the FAR. GSA
is also requesting comments on whether
‘‘post award’’ audit provisions should
be included in its Multiple Award
Schedules (MAS) contracts and
Governmentwide acquisition contracts
(GWACs). GSA is further amending the
correction notice published in the
Federal Register at 70 FR 13005, March
17, 2005, to add the following: In
addition, GSA is interested in receiving
comments on whether the Examination
of Records clause at GSAR 552.215–71
should be modified to reinstate postaward access to and the right to examine
records to verify that preaward/
modification pricing, sales, or other data
related to the supplies or services
offered under a contract which formed
the basis for an award/modification was
accurate, current, and complete. The
notice published in the Federal Register
at 70 FR 12167, March 11, 2005, is
amended to extend the public comment
date to May 10, 2005, and to allow
interested parties to submit
presentations by April 7, 2005.
DATES: Comment Date: Interested parties
should submit comments on or before
May 10, 2005, to be considered in the
formulation of a proposed rulemaking.
Public Meeting Presentation Date:
Interested parties may register and
submit presentations by April 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
to:
General Services Administration, FAR
Secretariat (VIR), 1800 F Street, NW,
Room 4035, ATTN: Laurieann Duarte,
Washington, DC 20405.
Submit electronic comments via the
Internet to: gsaranpr.2005–N01@gsa.gov
Submit electronic presentations via
the Internet to: meeting.2005–
NO1@gsa.gov.
Please submit comments or
presentations only and cite GSAR ANPR
2005–N01 in all correspondence related
to this case. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.acqnet.gov/far/ProposedRules/
proposed.htm, including any personal
information provided.
Public Meeting: The public meeting
will be conducted at the General
Services Administration, National
Capital Region, 301 7th and D Street,
SW, Washington, DC 20407,
Auditorium, starting at 9 a.m. to 4:00
p.m. EST., on April 14, 2005, to ensure
open dialogue between the Government
and interested parties on this important
topic.
Special Instructions. The submitted
presentations will be the only record of
the public meeting. If you intend to
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 12, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19045-19051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7270]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 538 and 552
[GSAR 2005-G501]
RIN 3090-AI06
General Services Acquisition Regulation; Federal Agency Retail
Pharmacy Program
AGENCY: Office of the Chief Acquisition Officer, General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) is proposing to
amend the General Services Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to add a new
subpart and clause required by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA),
consistent with Congressional intent under Section 603 of the Veterans
Health Care Act of 1992 (VHCA) that certain Federal agencies (i.e., VA,
Department of Defense (DoD), Public Health Service (including the
Indian Health Service), and the Coast Guard) have access to Federal
pricing for pharmaceuticals purchased for their beneficiaries.
GSA is responsible for the schedules program and rules related to
its operation. Under GSA's delegation of authority, the VA procures
medical supplies under the VA Federal Supply Schedule program. VA and
DoD seek this amendment. This new subpart adds a clause unique to the
virtual depot system established by a Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy
Program utilizing contracted retail pharmacies as part of a centralized
pharmaceutical commodity management program. At this time, only DoD has
a program in place, and the rule would facilitate DoD's access to
Federal pricing offered on Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) pharmaceutical
[[Page 19046]]
contracts for covered drugs purchased by DoD and dispensed to TRICARE
beneficiaries through retail pharmacies in the TRICARE network.
DATES: Interested parties should submit comments in writing on or
before June 13, 2005 to be considered in the formulation of a final
rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by GSAR case 2005-G501 by any of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web Site: https://www.acqnet.gov/GSAM/
gsamproposed.html. Click on the GSAR case number to submit comments.
E-mail: gsarcase.2005-G501@gsa.gov. Include GSAR case
2005-G501 in the subject line of the message.
Fax: 202-501-4067.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (VIR), 1800 F Street, NW, Room 4035, ATTN: Laurieann
Duarte, Washington, DC 20405.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite GSAR case 2005-
G501 in all correspondence related to this case. All comments received
will be posted without change to https://www.acqnet.gov/far/
ProposedRules/proposed.htm, including any personal information
provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT The Regulatory Secretariat (VIR), Room
4035, GS Building, Washington, DC 20405, (202) 208-7312, for
information pertaining to status or publication schedules. For
clarification of content, contact Ms. Kimberly Marshall at (202) 219-
0986, or by e-mail at kimberly.marshall@gsa.gov. Please cite GSAR case
2005-G501.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Introduction
Under the General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules (also
referred to as Multiple Award Schedules and Federal Supply Schedules)
Program, 41 U.S.C. 259(b) and 40 U.S.C. 501, GSA establishes long-term
Governmentwide contracts with commercial firms to provide access to
over four million commercial services and products that can be ordered
directly from GSA Schedule contractors or through the GSA Advantage!
\TM\ online shopping and ordering system.
GSA Schedules offer customers direct delivery of millions of state-
of-the-art, high-quality commercial services and products at volume
discount pricing. All customers, even those in remote locations, can
order the latest technology and quality services and products,
conveniently, and at most-favored customer prices. GSA Schedules also
offer the potential benefits of shorter lead-times, lower
administrative costs, and reduced inventories. When using GSA
Schedules, ordering activities have the opportunity to meet small
business goals, while promoting compliance with various environmental
and socioeconomic laws and regulations.
The General Services Administration has delegated the
responsibility for certain Federal Supply Schedules to the Department
of Veterans Affairs (VA). This includes Federal Supply Classification
(FSC) Group 65, which includes pharmaceuticals and drugs. Federal
agencies and certain other organizations are eligible to purchase
pharmaceuticals and drugs from VA supply schedules.
B. Background
1. The Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy Program Supply Schedule
clause. These changes will allow VA to revise its schedule contracts to
accommodate the ordering needs of Federal agencies, i.e. DOD, VA, the
Public Health Service (including the Indian Health Service), and the
Coast Guard, pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8126, through virtual depot systems.
These depot systems will use contracted retail pharmacies as part of
the centralized pharmaceutical commodity management program. DoD's
TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Program is the first such virtual depot system
and will be the prototype for future systems. This rule will allow
Federal agencies to take advantage of FSS pricing and receive a refund,
where appropriate, from drug manufacturers for sales to those agencies
through the retail pharmacy network virtual depot system, for their
beneficiaries.
In general, Federal pricing of pharmaceuticals refers to discounts
(Federal Ceiling Prices (FCPs)) available from manufacturers under
Section 603 of the Veterans Health Care Act (VHCA) of 1992 (38 U.S.C.
8126), and Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) prices under the VA Federal
Supply Schedule program. The VHCA requires drug manufacturers to enter
into a Master Agreement with VA under which a Pharmaceutical Pricing
Agreement is executed establishing a discount for covered drugs
obtained by VA, DoD, the Public Health Service (including the Indian
Health Service), and the Coast Guard purchased by these Federal
agencies under depot contracting systems or listed on the FSS.
Specifically, this rule adds a new subpart to the GSAR on Federal
Agency Retail Pharmacy Program (subpart 538.XX) and a new clause,
Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy Program Supply Schedule (GSAR 552.238-
XX) for those Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy Programs determined by the
VA Secretary to qualify as a ``depot'' contracting system as set forth
in 38 U.S.C. 8126.
This rulemaking assists the ongoing reengineering of the TRICARE
Pharmacy Benefits Program (TPBP), consistent with the Congressional
actions and DoD's prior rulemaking described below. This rulemaking is
consistent with the authority provided by 38 U.S.C. 8126 to acquire
drugs at the statutorily provided discount through use of a depot
contracting system.
Pursuant to the Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy Program clause, the
drugs for beneficiaries will be deemed to be ordered by the Federal
agencies through the FSS contract solely for the purposes of pricing,
delivery, and scope of coverage, but does not confer rights for any
other purpose. The Federal agencies will obtain refunds on covered
drugs purchased through the retail pharmacy network by those agencies
and dispensed to beneficiaries. The drug manufacturer will base the
refund on the difference between a benchmark price, consisting of
either the manufacturer's actual sales price to the wholesaler or
retail pharmacy chain when known and auditable or non-FAMP (non-Federal
average manufacturer price) and the Federal Supply Schedule price (the
Federal Ceiling Price or FSS negotiated price, whichever is lower).
The Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy Program Supply Schedule clause
in this rule refers to a VA clause, ``Industrial Funding Fee and Sales
Reporting (JUL 2003)(Variation''). This clause is available at the
following website: https://www.va.gov/oamm/nac/fsss/.
2. The TRICARE Pharmacy Benefits Program (TPBP) of the Department
of Defense. This rule is required by DoD in order to reengineer its
TRICARE Pharmacy Benefits Program. DoD is directed by statute (title
10, United States Code, chapter 55) to provide an improved and uniform
health care benefits program in order to create and maintain high
morale in the uniformed services. TRICARE is DoD's comprehensive health
care program for over 9.3 million beneficiaries--active duty Service
members and their families, as well as retirees and their families and
survivors--and includes a robust pharmacy benefit that gives
beneficiaries the option of obtaining drugs from military treatment
facilities, by mail order, or through retail
[[Page 19047]]
pharmacies. The TRICARE pharmacy website is at https://
www.tricare.osd.mil/pharmacy/. The TRICARE Pharmacy Benefits Program
uses the VA supply schedules, among other vehicles.
Section 703 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 1999
(Public Law 105-261) required the Secretary of Defense to plan a
``system-wide redesign of the military and contractor retail and mail-
order pharmacy system of the Department of Defense by incorporating
'best business practices' of the private sector.'' In addition, section
701 of the FY 2000 National Defense Authorization Act (Public Law 106-
65) enacted 10 U.S.C. 1074g, which directed the Secretary to
``establish an effective, efficient, integrated pharmacy benefits
program.''
DoD has reengineered the TPBP to meet these Congressional
requirements. The redesign of the TPBP was the subject of public
rulemaking (see 69 FR 17035, April 1, 2004) and is codified at 32 CFR
Section 199.21.
One key goal of the reengineering effort is to extend Federal
pricing of pharmaceuticals to prescriptions filled for TRICARE
beneficiaries by retail pharmacies in the TRICARE network. DOD has
taken advantage of the statutory pricing authority with respect to
drugs purchased and dispensed through the TRICARE mail order pharmacy
program and military hospitals. DoD is now in a position to extend
Federal pricing to the TRICARE retail pharmacy network. As a result of
reengineering, DoD is able to link DoD's drug purchases from network
pharmacies to the manufacturer of the purchased drug, including those
manufacturers with FSS contracts.
In particular, the redesigned TPBP leverages new technology to
create a centralized commodity management system as required under the
VHCA for a depot contracting system. As previously stated, the VHCA
requires drug manufacturers to enter into a Master Agreement with VA
under which a Pharmaceutical Pricing Agreement is executed establishing
a discount for covered drugs purchased by VA, DoD, the Public Health
Service (including the Indian Health Service), and the Coast Guard
under depot contracting systems or listed on the FSS. All drug
manufacturers that signed a Master Agreement and Pharmaceutical Pricing
Agreement with VA were advised by letter signed by the Acting Executive
Director, VA National Acquisition Center, dated October 14, 2004 (which
letter is hereby incorporated by reference), that the VA Secretary had
determined that DoD's TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Program was a centralized
pharmaceutical commodity management system that met the definition of
``depot'' contracting system as set forth in 38 U.S.C. 8126. While that
letter authorized DoD to obtain Federal Ceiling Prices for drugs
purchased through the TRICARE retail pharmacy network after September
30, 2004, this rule will extend FSS pricing to such drugs.
Pursuant to the terms of a contract awarded by DoD, a commercial
pharmacy benefits manager (PBM) will provide a retail pharmacy network
for the DoD TRICARE Management Activity. The PBM will issue payment
with Government funds for prescriptions dispensed by retail network
pharmacies to TRICARE beneficiaries. DoD will provide manufacturers
with itemized data on covered drugs purchased through TRICARE retail
network pharmacies in order to obtain appropriate refunds on covered
drugs delivered to TRICARE beneficiaries.
DoD will use the reporting and audit capabilities of the Pharmacy
Data Transaction Service (PDTS) to verify beneficiary eligibility,
authorize prescription payments, and validate the refund owed to the
Government.
The PBM contractor has no role in DoD's process for obtaining
refunds based on FSS prices (whether Federal Ceiling Prices or
negotiated lower FSS prices) already established by VA. Nor is DoD's
payment to the PBM contractor related, either directly or indirectly,
to Federal pricing of pharmaceuticals dispensed to TRICARE
beneficiaries by network pharmacies.
Congress has anticipated the extension of Federal pricing to the
redesigned TPBP. In the Defense Appropriations Act for FY 2005 (Public
Law 108-287), Congress decreased the funding in the Defense Health
Program account to reflect savings generated from the application of
Federal pricing to the TRICARE pharmacy program. In addition, Senate
Report No. 108-260, accompanying the proposed National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005, S. 2400, reiterates an
expectation for savings and recommends further decreases to TRICARE
program funding. The report (page 313) states:
The budget request reflected $172.0 million in savings related
to the use of federal pricing for retail pharmaceuticals in fiscal
year 2005. The committee understands that the funding in the defense
health program request did not reflect anticipated savings for
retail pharmaceuticals beginning in June 2004, when federal pricing
authorized by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under title 38,
United States Code, is applied in a new retail pharmacy program.
Accordingly, the committee recommends a decrease of $44 million in
the defense health program account.
It should be noted that the effective date in the aforementioned
committee report has been extended to October 1, 2004.
3. The Department of Veterans Affairs. The General Services
Administration is promulgating this rule also to assist efforts by the
Department of Veterans Affairs to provide medical care and associated
services to veterans of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation
Enduring Freedom (OEF), as well as to provide more efficient access to
newly written prescriptions for veterans currently receiving medical
care at locations where VA pharmacy services are not immediately
available. Such venues primarily include Community Based Outpatient
Clinics (CBOCs). As is the current practice, refills would be handled
at VA's consolidated mail outpatient pharmacies (CMOPs).
As some portion of OIF and OEF veterans will be returning from
combat areas to their homes in locations where VA pharmacy services are
not immediately available, VA is currently contemplating how to meet
the needs of these returning soldiers for timely, high-quality and
cost-effective prescription services. Based upon the July 29, 2004, VHA
report, ``Analysis of VA Health Care Utilization Among Veterans of
Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom'', approximately
27,571 (16 percent) of the 168,528 separated OIF veterans and 5,113 (11
percent) of the 45,880 separated OEF veterans identified by VA based on
data provided by DoD, have sought VA health care since they were
deployed. VA believes that contractual arrangements whereby VA pays for
new prescriptions at Federal prices in community settings will allow VA
to meet its obligations to its existing patients, as well as newly
enrolled OIF and OEF beneficiaries, in a cost-effective and timely
manner.
In the future, it is likely that VA will make use of this rule to
provide prescription services to beneficiaries authorized to receive
services under one or more of the following programs: VA's CHAMPVA, VA
Fee Program, Spina Bifada Health Care Program, Children of Women
Vietnam Veterans Program, or other contracted medical care programs.
While VA does not currently have contractual arrangements in place to
immediately take advantage of this rule, it is actively engaged in the
preparatory work to solicit for such contracts.
[[Page 19048]]
CHAMPVA
CHAMPVA is a health care benefits program for--
Dependents of veterans who have been rated by the VA as
having a total and permanent disability;
Survivors of veterans who died from VA-rated service-
connected conditions, or, who at the time of death, were rated
permanently and totally disabled from a VA-rated service-connected
condition; and
Survivors of persons who died in the line of duty and not
due to misconduct and not otherwise entitled to benefits under DoD's
TRICARE program.
Under CHAPVA, VA shares the cost of covered health care services
and supplies with eligible beneficiaries. As is the current practice,
patients would continue to have a choice to refill their medications
through the VA CMOP under the Made-by-Mail program. For fiscal year
2004 (FY 04), there were 234,000 beneficiaries enrolled and 149,400
unique users for the CHAMPVA program.
VA Fee Program
The VA Fee program provides authorization for certain veterans to
receive community-based medical care, hospital care, home care, nursing
home care, and services when VA facilities are not available. Fee care
is governed by 38 U.S.C. 1703, 38 U.S.C. 1725, and 38 U.S.C. 1728.
Approved services are generally paid on a fee-for-service or contract
schedule. Authorization may be for brief or long-term episodes of care.
Spina Bifida Health Care Program
Spina Bifida Health Care Program provides benefits to Vietnam
veterans' birth children diagnosed with spina bifida and who are in
receipt of a VA regional office award for spina bifida benefits. Under
this program, VA assumes financial responsibility for medical service
and supplies related to the treatment of spina bifida, including
complications and associated conditions, excluding spina bifida
occulta. Spina bifida beneficiaries are not responsible for a cost
share. In FY 04, there were 1,164 beneficiaries enrolled and 689 unique
users for the Spina Bifida Health Care program.
Children of Women Vietnam Veterans Program
Children of Women Vietnam Veterans (CWVV) program provides benefits
for women Vietnam veterans' birth children diagnosed with one or more
covered birth defects as determined by the Denver VA regional office.
Under this program, VA assumes financial responsibility for medical
services and supplies related to the treatment of the covered birth
defects, including complications and associated conditions. CWVV
beneficiaries are not responsible for a cost share. In FY 04, there
were eight beneficiaries enrolled and no unique users for the CWVV
program.
4. The U.S. Public Health Service (including the Indian Health
Service). Although the U.S. Public Health Service/Indian Health Service
do not have current plans to establish a Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy
program, if and when the VA Secretary determines that such a program
initiated by these agencies qualifies as a ``depot'' contracting system
as set forth in 38 U.S.C. 8126, this rule would apply to that program.
C. Executive Order 12866
We have examined the impacts of the proposed rule under Executive
Order 12866. Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation
is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net
benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). We
believe that this proposed rule is consistent with the regulatory
philosophy and principles identified in the Executive order. This
proposed rule is considered a significant regulatory action under the
Executive order.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before issuing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $115 million, using the implicit GDP deflator for
2003, the most recent year for which final data exist. This proposed
rule does not contain such a mandate.
E. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 804) requires that
regulations that have been identified as being major must be submitted
to Congress before taking effect. If implemented as proposed, this rule
is not a major rule under the Congressional Review Act.
F. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), requires
agencies to analyze regulatory options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small entities. This rulemaking assists
VA's efforts to revise its schedule to accommodate the ordering needs
of Federal agencies, i.e., DoD, VA, the Public Health Service
(including the Indian Health Service), and the Coast Guard, pursuant to
38 U.S.C. 8126, through virtual depot systems. At this time, only DoD
has a program in place, TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Program, that is
designed to work through a virtual depot system. The Coast Guard
utilizes the TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Program and, thus, is included in
the DoD TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
discussion below.
The changes may have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. However, this appears to be very unlikely. The Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is as follows:
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, GSAR Case 2005-G501, Federal
Agency Retail Pharmacy Program
This Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has been prepared
in accordance with Section 603, Title 5, of the United States Code.
1. Description of the reasons why action by the agency is being
considered. This rule amends the General Services Acquisition
Regulation (GSAR) to add a new subpart and clause to complement
ongoing efforts by the Department of Defense (DoD) to reengineer its
TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Benefits Program, and the Department of
Veterans Affairs' (VA) plans to create a similar program. This is
consistent with Congressional intent under Section 603 of the
Veterans Health Care Act of 1992 (VHCA) that certain Federal
agencies (i.e., VA, DoD, Public Health Service (including the Indian
Health Service), and the Coast Guard) have access to Federal pricing
for pharmaceuticals purchased for their beneficiaries.
2. Succinct statement of the objectives of, and legal basis for,
the rule. Section 603 of the VHCA requires that certain Federal
agencies (i.e., VA, DoD, Public Health Service (including the Indian
Health Service), and the Coast Guard) have access to Federal pricing
for pharmaceuticals purchased for their beneficiaries. This rule
would facilitate DoD's access to Federal pricing offered on Federal
Supply Schedule (FSS) pharmaceutical contracts for covered drugs
purchased by DoD and dispensed to TRICARE beneficiaries through
retail pharmacies in the TRICARE network. It would also facilitate
access to the same Federal pricing for retail network pharmacy
programs instituted by the other agencies named in section 603. GSA
has overall responsibility for the schedules program and
[[Page 19049]]
rules related to its operation and have empowered VA, under a GSA
delegation of authority, to procure medical supplies under the VA
Federal Supply Schedule program. VA and DoD both seek this amendment
to the GSAR.
3. Description of and, where feasible, estimate of the number of
small entities to which the rule will apply. The changes may have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq., but this appears to be very unlikely because of
the research conducted (queries of the Central Contractor
Registration system database, as well as information provided
directly by DoD and VA officials).
It is estimated that the rule will apply to approximately two
dozen small businesses as a result of these changes. It should be
noted that more than half of these businesses have annual gross
sales exceeding $20 million, thus comparing very favorably with
their large business counterparts. Further, the high gross sales
figures of the small businesses in the pharmaceutical industry
indicates the reporting of sales and the payment of refunds to the
Federal agencies named in section 603 will have little significant
impact on them.
Since subcontractors are not required to be registered in CCR,
the total number of small businesses positively impacted may be
greater than this; but not significantly so, since subcontracting is
not common in the production of pharmaceuticals.
4. Description of projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other
compliance requirements of the rule, including an estimate of the
classes of small entities which will be subject to the requirement
and the type of professional skills necessary for preparation of the
report or record. The rule will impose a new three-step reporting/
recordkeeping requirement on all entities that hold VA Federal
Supply Schedule contracts (for FSC Group 65, which includes covered
pharmaceuticals and drugs), including small entities. The first step
is the reporting of VA schedule sales of covered drugs (under
section 603) under the TRICARE and other Federal agency retail
pharmacy programs. The second step is the calculation and the
payment of the refunds owed to DoD and other named Federal agencies
with similar programs. The third step is the calculation and payment
of the industrial funding fee owed to VA. This paperwork
justification covers the calculation of the refunds owed to DoD. The
types of professional skills necessary for the reporting/
recordkeeping and processing of payment is very minimal--
predominately spreadsheet and database operational skills which are
both essentially clerical. The recordkeeping and processing of
payment transactions can both be accomplished electronically, so the
effort to be expended on this is minimal.
5. Identification, to the extent practicable, of all relevant
Federal rules which may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the
rule. This rule is to assist DoD in the final phase of implementing
the following: Section 703 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for FY 1999 (Public Law 105-261) which required the Secretary of
Defense to plan a system-wide redesign of the military and
contractor retail and mail-order pharmacy system of the Department;
and Section 701 of the FY 2000 National Defense Authorization Act
(Public Law 106-65) enacted 10 U.S.C. 1074g, which directed the
Secretary to establish an effective, efficient, integrated pharmacy
benefits program. This rule also facilitates access to the same
Federal pricing for retail network pharmacy programs instituted by
other agencies under section 603. There are no other known Federal
rules which may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule.
6. Description of any significant alternatives to the rule which
accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes and which
minimize any significant economic impact of the rule on small
entities. There are no known alternatives to accomplish the stated
objectives to assist DoD's reengineered TRICARE Retail Pharmacy
Benefits Program and VA's planned retail pharmacy program, which
would further lessen any significant economic impact of the rule on
small entities. As stated previously, the economic impact is deemed
to be minimal.
The Regulatory Secretariat has submitted a copy of the IRFA to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
Interested parties may obtain a copy from the Regulatory Secretariat.
The Councils will consider comments from small entities concerning the
affected GSAR Parts 538 and 552 in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610.
Interested parties must submit such comments separately and should cite
5 U.S.C 601, et seq. (GSAR case 2005-G501), in correspondence.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking assists VA's efforts to revise its schedule to
accommodate the ordering needs of Federal agencies, i.e., DoD, VA, the
Public Health Service (including the Indian Health Service), and the
Coast Guard, pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8126, through virtual depot systems.
At this time only DoD has a program in place, TRICARE Retail Pharmacy
Program that is designed to work through a virtual depot system. The
Coast Guard utilizes the TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Program; and, thus, is
included in the DoD TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Paperwork Burden discussion
below.
The discussion of information collection activities below applies
to the DoD TRICARE program. It is expected that other eligible agencies
will request additional collections of information specific to their
respective programs. At such time eligible agencies will request OMB
numbers for prospective collections and seek public comment.
Summary of Collection of Information: DoD is revising the
information collection requirements under current OMB control number
0720-0032. Specifically, under the revised collection of information,
respondents (drug manufacturers) will base refund calculation reporting
requirements on both the Federal Ceiling Price and the Federal Supply
Schedule Price, whichever is lower. Prior to this rulemaking, drug
manufacturers' reporting requirements addressed only the Federal
Ceiling Price.
Proposed Use of Information: DoD will use the reporting and audit
capabilities of the Pharmacy Data Transaction Service (PDTS) to
validate refunds owed to the Government.
Annual Reporting Burden: Public reporting burden for this
collection of information is estimated to average 8 hours per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
The annual reporting burden is estimated as follows:
Respondents: There are approximately 300 drug manufacturers
responding to this collection.
Responses per respondent: 4
Total annual responses: 1,200
Preparation hours per response: 8
Total response burden hours: 9,600
H. Request for Comments Regarding Paperwork Burden
Submit comments, including suggestions for reducing this burden,
not later than June 13, 2005 to: DoD Health Desk Officer, OMB, Room
10102, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, and a copy to the General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (VIR), 1800 F Street, NW, Room
4035, Washington, DC 20405, and a copy to Colonel James Young, or Major
Travis Watson, TRICARE Management Activity, 5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite
810, Falls Church, VA 22041-3206 (703 681-0039).
Public comments are particularly invited on: whether this
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
functions of the DoD, and will have practical utility; whether our
estimate of the public burden of this collection of information is
accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, through the use
of appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
[[Page 19050]]
Requester may obtain a copy of the justification from the Colonel
James Young or Major Travis Watson, TRICARE Management Activity, 5111
Leesburg Pike, Suite 810, Falls Church, VA 22041-3206 (703 681-0039).
Please cite OMB Control Number 0720-0032, GSAR case 2005-G501, Federal
Agency Retail Pharmacy Program, in all correspondence.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 538 and 552
Government procurement.
Dated: April 6, 2005.
David A. Drabkin,
Senior Procurement Executive, Office of the Chief Acquisition Officer,
General Services Administration.
Therefore, GSA proposes amending 48 CFR parts 538 and 552 as set
forth below:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 538 and 552 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c).
PART 538--FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE CONTRACTING
2. Add Subpart 538.XX, consisting of sections 538.XX01 and
538.XX02, to read as follows:
Sec.
538.XX01 Scope.
538.XX02 Contract clause.
Subpart 538-XX--Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy Program
538.XX01 Scope.
This subpart prescribes a clause that applies to a retail pharmacy
program of any of the Federal agencies covered by Section 603 of the
Veterans Health Care Act (VHCA) of 1992, Public Law 102-585 (38 U.S.C.
8126). As described in 38 U.S.C. 8126(b), the Federal agencies include
the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Department of Defense (DoD),
Public Health Service (including the Indian Health Service), and the
Coast Guard.
538.XX02 Contract clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 552.238-XX,
Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy Program Supply Schedule, in solicitation
and schedule contracts for Schedule 65, Part I, Section B, to apply
only to orders for a Retail Pharmacy Program of the Department of
Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense, Public Health Service
(including the Indian Health Service), and the Coast Guard.
PART 552--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
3. Add section 552.238-XX to read as follows:
552.238-XX Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy Program Supply Schedule.
As prescribed in 538.XX02, insert the following clause:
FEDERAL AGENCY RETAIL PHARMACY PROGRAM SUPPLY SCHEDULE (DATE)
(a) This clause applies only to a Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy
Program administered by one of the Federal agencies described in
Section 603 of the Veterans Health Care Act (VHCA) of 1992 (38
U.S.C. 8126). When this clause applies, the FAR clauses 52.216-18,
52.216-19, GSAR clause 552.232-74, and FSS clauses I-FSS-103, and F-
FSS-202-G do not apply.
(b) The Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy Program procedures,
including pricing procedures, and those in this clause, are
consistent with 38 U.S.C. 8126. The Federal agency enters into
contracts with a commercial pharmacy benefits manager to provide a
retail pharmacy network. The pharmacy benefits manager will issue
payment with Government funds to the retail pharmacy for
prescriptions dispensed to the Federal agency beneficiaries. The
Federal agency will provide to FSS contractors itemized data on
covered drugs procured through the agency's retail network
pharmacies, in order to obtain appropriate refunds on covered drugs
delivered to the Federal agency's beneficiaries and subject to
Federal pricing. The drugs will be deemed to have been ordered by
the Federal agency through the FSS contract, for the purposes of
establishing price, delivery, and scope of coverage, but does not
confer rights for any other purpose. The Federal agency will obtain
refunds on covered drugs from FSS contractors based on the
difference between a benchmark price, consisting of either the
manufacturer's actual sales price to the wholesaler or retail
pharmacy chain when known and auditable or non-FAMP (non-Federal
average manufacturer price), and the Federal Supply Schedule price
(the Federal Ceiling Price or FSS negotiated price, whichever is
lower).
(c) Ordering. (1) All Federal agency network retail pharmacy
prescription orders for covered drugs are subject to the terms and
conditions of this contract. In the event of conflict between a
prescription order and this contract, the contract shall control.
(2) A Federal agency's instruction to its contracted or
subcontracted retail pharmacy to fill a prescription for a health
care beneficiary of the agency, under its virtual depot system for
centralized pharmaceutical management, shall be deemed to be an
order placed against this contract.
(d) Invoice payments. The time and method of payments to the
Contractor for FSS items deemed (for the purposes of establishing
price, delivery, and scope of coverage) to have been ordered by a
Federal agency through its contracted or subcontracted retail
pharmacies will be determined according to commercial agreements
between the FSS Contractor and such pharmacies or their authorized
Pharmaceutical Prime Vendors.
(e) Scope of contract worldwide. (1) This solicitation is issued
to establish contracts which may be used as sources of supplies or
services described herein for domestic and/or overseas delivery.
(2) Definition. Domestic delivery is delivery within the 48
contiguous states, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Washington, DC, and
U.S. territories. Domestic delivery also includes a port or
consolidation point, within the aforementioned areas, for orders
received from overseas activities.
(3) Contractor will provide domestic delivery only for Federal
agency retail pharmacy orders.
(4) The Contractor is obligated to accept orders received from
activities within the Executive branch of the Federal Government.
Federal beneficiary prescriptions for FSS-listed covered drugs that
are filled through a Federal agency's directly contracted or
indirectly subcontracted retail pharmacy, under the agency's virtual
depot system for centralized pharmaceutical commodity management,
will be deemed to constitute Executive branch orders, solely for the
purposes of establishing pricing, delivery, and scope of coverage,
but does not confer rights for any other purpose.
(f) Delivery prices. Prices offered must cover delivery of FSS
covered drugs to all Federal agency contracted or subcontracted
retail pharmacies (or to their authorized PPVs) for use in filling
prescriptions for such agencies' beneficiaries, as part of the
agencies' virtual depot system for centralized pharmaceutical
commodity management.
(g)Electronic Commerce. A Federal Agency Retail Pharmacy Program
will require a Contractor to receive and process refund requests
submitted according to the following procedures:
(1) On the 15th of the month following the end of each calendar
year quarter, the Federal Agency Pharmacy Benefits Office (PBO) will
generate and submit to each pharmaceutical manufacturer a
Utilization Flat File Layout Report for their products procured
during the prior quarter, based on National Council for Prescription
Drug Programs (NCPDP) Standards Version 03 Release 02 (or most
current version).
(i) The 15th was selected to enable reversals to clear within
the 10-day hold period.
(ii) NCPDP represents industry standards.
(iii) The Federal agency, VA, and industry (as a whole) will
establish an interface control document for the transmission and
file layout, to include the population of optional and conditional
data elements for standardization for all of industry.
(iv) Separate reports will be generated for purchases paid from
the Department of Defense's (DoD's) Accrual Fund and DHP account.
(2) Within the Utilization Flat File Detail Record (UD), the
product code identifier will be used by the Contractor to sum (grand
metric quantity) the total metric decimal quantity of individual
records of each product purchased by the Government
[[Page 19051]]
through individual Federal agency retail network pharmacies. The
grand metric quantity for each product will then be rounded down to
the nearest package size based on the product code identifier to
yield the total number of units procured by the Federal agency.
(i) The National Drug Code (NDC) number will be used to populate
the product code identifier. The NDC should correlate to the actual
product dispensed by the pharmacy, based on commercial best practice
and data integrity requirements demanded by health plans and other
insurers.
(ii) The Federal agency's Office of Program Integrity will be
notified of any pharmacies identified (by Government, industry, or
other means) as submitting fraudulent NDCs.
(iii) NDCs assigned by product repackagers will only be included
in the reports when the repackager NDC can be correlated to the NDC
of the originating product.
(3) Contractor Refund and Reporting Schedule. (i) The Contractor
shall complete refund calculations not later than 60 days following
the date of the quarterly UD Report.
(ii) The Contractor shall make refund payments so that such
payments are received by DoD not later than 70 days following the
date of the quarterly UD Report. At the time of refund payment, the
Contractor shall also send to the Federal Agency's Pharmacy Benefits
Office (PBO) a Reconciliation Report corresponding to the quarterly
UD Report and resulting refund payment.
(h) Resolution of Refund Data Disagreements. (1) If the
Contractor disagrees with the Federal agency data in the quarterly
refund request under paragraph (g) of this clause, the Contractor
shall provide prompt written notice to the PBO. Such notice shall be
received by the PBO no later than 10 business days after the
Contractor's discovery of the alleged error, but in no event no
later than one year after the date of the quarterly report
containing the alleged erroneous data. The notice shall include
specific identification of the alleged error(s) and the specific
reason(s) the Contractor believes the data to be in error, along
with all available documentation that supports the Contractor's
allegation(s).
(2) The Federal agency's PBO will initiate a prompt review of
the data following receipt of the notice and documentation provided
by the Contractor. The parties agree to use their best good faith
efforts to resolve any disagreement within 60 days of the PBO's
receipt of the Contractor's written notice. During this period, the
Contractor shall proceed diligently with performance of this
contract and will exhaust administrative remedies under this clause
prior to filing a dispute under the Disputes clause incorporated
into this contract. Performance includes remittance of any refund
due the Federal agency based upon the data provided by the PBO with
which the Contractor disagrees. If the written notice of
disagreement is resolved in favor of the Contractor, the Federal
agency shall reimburse the Contractor the amount of remitted refund
attributed to the error and simple interest on the reimbursed amount
at the rate determined in accordance with the Contract Disputes Act
of 1978, as amended (41 U.S.C. 601-603), from the date of receipt of
the Contractor's remittance of the refund in disagreement.
(3) If the Federal agency and the Contractor cannot resolve the
disagreement within 60 days following receipt of the Contractor's
written notice (and any time extensions mutually agreed to by the
parties), the Contractor shall have exhausted administrative
remedies under this clause and may proceed with disputes remedies
available under the Disputes clause and the Contract Disputes Act of
1978, as amended.
(i) Industrial Funding Fee and Sales Reporting. The Contractor
shall report all contract sales covered by this clause and pay the
Industrial Funding Fee (IFF) included therein, as required by VA's
variation of clause 552.238-74 of the contract, ``Industrial Funding
Fee and Sales Reporting (JUL 2003) (Variation''). All sales of
covered drugs made through retail pharmacies under this clause are
deemed to be reportable when the Contractor receives the quarterly
Utilization Flat File Layout Report(s) (or its functional
substitute), applies the appropriate FSS contract price (including
IFF) to the rounded total number of units of each covered product
purchased by the submitting agency (as shown on the Flat File
Report), and computes the total dollar sales of each product. These
sales are counted as FSS sales on the date the computations are
finished (for example, the results of computations finished on March
10 are reported 60 days after the end of the first calendar quarter,
on May 30). The grand total of all retail pharmacy sales (at the
appropriate FSS contract prices) under this clause computed during a
calendar quarter shall be included in the Contractor's quarterly
sales report to VA. That information and the resultant IFF shall be
provided to VA according to the timelines and procedures established
in 552.238-74.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 05-7270 Filed 4-11-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-S